Abstract P1-07-10: Immunohistochemical (IHC) marker discordance between primary breast cancer biopsy and recurrent cancer: Would IHC testing of the surgical breast or lymph node have altered treatment?

Objective: Based on emerging data on tumor heterogeneity and the evolutionary branching of tumor cells, tumor cells in the lymph node may represent more virulent clones with the inherent capability of metastasis. IHC discordance from original cancer diagnosis to recurrence is documented to occur in up to 20% of cases, raising the question if characterization of these likely more virulent cells would more accurately guide treatment and predict prognosis. Our pilot study sought to determine if crucial clinical information is gained by IHC testing of the surgical breast or lymph node specimens at the time of initial surgery.

Methods: Using the cancer registry and oncology records, all invasive breast cancers diagnosed after 2001 with subsequent recurrence were identified. Cases missing all IHC data were disqualified. We then evaluated ER and HER2 of the primary cancer biopsy and recurrence biopsy to identify discordances. Those with discordances who had surgical breast and lymph node specimens available were accessed, tested, and evaluated by our breast cancer pathologist.

Results: A total of 128 recurrence cases with partial or complete primary and recurrence IHC data were identified. Of the 95 initially ER positive cases with recurrence IHC available, 13/95 had discordant, or ER negative, recurrence. Additionally, 5/27 initially ER negative tumors, 3/14 initially HER2 positive tumors, and 6/69 initially HER2 negative tumors had discordant recurrence results. In 128 cases, 27 cases were identified to have ER or HER2 discordance from primary biopsy diagnosis to recurrence. Of all cases with original surgical breast or positive lymph node specimen available, 9 markers on 7 patients were performed for our pilot study. One of seven surgical breast specimens and one of two lymph node specimens were concordant with the recurrence, but not the initial biopsy. The tested surgical breast was ER positive, while the surgical lymph node was HER2 positive, concordant to their recurrences, but discordant with initial biopsy.

 Breast BiopsyRecurrence ConcordantRecurrence DiscordantER Positive98/12782/9513/95 (14%)ER Negative29/12724/275/27 (19%) Total ER Discordance  18/122 (15%)HER2 Positive19/11911/143/14 (22%)HER2 Negative100/11963/696/69 (9%) Total HER2 Discordance  9/83 (11%)

Conclusion: Tumor discordance of the original cancer biopsy and recurrence is not uncommon. Our pilot study demonstrated that ER and HER2 discordance occurred in 15% and 11% of cases, respectively. Though our pilot study was limited by small sample size, we found that IHC testing of the surgical breast and lymph node specimen may provide additional clinical information and affect management. Of the two cases that had a positive lymph node available, one was HER2 positive and concordant with the recurrence. Of the seven breast specimens tested, one was ER positive and concordant with the recurrence. Had IHC testing been performed at that time of surgery, adjuvant treatment management would have been altered. Further testing of our IHC discordant recurrence patient population will be pursued to investigate the potential benefits of surgical breast and lymph node IHC testing.

Citation Format: Michele M Gage, Martin Rosman, Charles Mylander, Crystal Tran, Rubie S Jackson, Lorraine Tafra. Immunohistochemical (IHC) marker discordance between primary breast cancer biopsy and recurrent cancer: Would IHC testing of the surgical breast or lymph node have altered treatment? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-10.

A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies

Background

The presence of tumor cells at the margins of breast lumpectomy specimens is associated with an increased risk of ipsilateral tumor recurrence. Twenty to 30 % of patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery require second procedures to achieve negative margins. This study evaluated the adjunctive use of the MarginProbe device (Dune Medical Devices Ltd, Caesarea, Israel) in providing real-time intraoperative assessment of lumpectomy margins.

Methods

This multicenter randomized trial enrolled patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. The study evaluated MarginProbe use in addition to standard intraoperative methods for margin assessment. After specimen removal and inspection, patients were randomized to device or control arms. In the device arm, MarginProbe was used to examine the main lumpectomy specimens and direct additional excision of positive margins. Intraoperative imaging was used in both arms; no intraoperative pathology assessment was permitted.

Results

In total, 596 patients were enrolled. False-negative rates were 24.8 and 66.1 % and false-positive rates were 53.6 and 16.6 % in the device and control arms, respectively. All positive margins on positive main specimens were resected in 62 % (101 of 163) of cases in the device arm, versus 22 % (33 of 147) in the control arm (p < 0.001). A total of 19.8 % (59 of 298) of patients in the device arm underwent a reexcision procedure compared with 25.8 % (77 of 298) in the control arm (6 % absolute, 23 % relative reduction). The difference in tissue volume removed was not significant.

Conclusions

Adjunctive use of the MarginProbe device during breast-conserving surgery improved surgeons’ ability to identify and resect positive lumpectomy margins in the absence of intraoperative pathology assessment, reducing the number of patients requiring reexcision. MarginProbe may aid performance of breast-conserving surgery by reducing the burden of reexcision procedures for patients and the health care system.

A prediction model for the presence of axillary lymph node involvement in women with invasive breast cancer: a focus on older women

Axillary lymph node (ALN) status at diagnosis is the most powerful prognostic indicator for patients with breast cancer. Our aim is to examine the contribution of variables that lead to ALN metastases in a large dataset with a high proportion of patients greater than 70 years old. Using the data from two multicenter prospective studies, a retrospective review was performed on 2,812 patients diagnosed with clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer from 1996 to 2005 and who underwent ALN sampling. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify variables that were strongly associated with axillary metastases, and an equation was developed to estimate risk of ALN metastases. Of the 2,812 patients with invasive breast cancer, 18% had ALN metastases at diagnosis. Based on univariate analysis, tumor size, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), tumor grade, age at diagnosis, menopausal status, race, tumor location, tumor type, and estrogen and progesterone receptor status were statistically significant. The relationship between age and involvement of axillary metastases was nonlinear. In multivariate analysis, LVI, tumor size and menopausal status were the most significant factors associated with ALN metastases. Age, however, was not a significant contributing factor for axillary metastases. Tumor size, LVI, and menopausal status are strongly associated with ALN metastases. We believe that age may have been a strong factor in previous analyses because there was not an adequate representation of women in older age groups and because of the violation of the assumption of linearity in their multivariate analyses.

Abstract P4-06-03: Assays on core biopsies and surgically resected tumors may result in different subtyping of the invasive breast cancer from the same patient

Background Core biopsies (CBs) are often used for biomarker expression assays to determine the treatment regimen. However, a number of other clinically important analyses (e.g. OncoType Dx), are performed on surgically resected tumors (SRTs). A previous study has shown that biomarkers ER, PR, and Ki67 expressed higher in CBs than in SRTs. Here we analyze how this difference impacts the subtyping of ER+ breast tumors.

Methods Female patients enrolled in the Clinical Breast Care Project (CBCP) from a civilian site were selected for this study, where expression of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 were assayed by IHC in a reference lab on CBs; the same 4 assays were performed on SRTs by a CBCP central lab. Both labs are CLIA-certified. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those with multiple tumors were excluded. 167 cases were identified for this study to compare assays performed on CBs and SRTs from the same patients. ER and PR were positive if &gt;1% nuclear staining, HER2 was negative if IHC = 0 or 1+, positive if IHC = 3+, and for IHC = 2+ FISH was used for the final call. Ki67 was positive if &gt; = 15% nuclear staining. LA was ER+/HER2-/Ki67-, LB1 was ER+/HER2-/Ki67+, and LB2 was ER+/HER2+. For histologic grades, only readings from the central lab on SRTs were used. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS.

Results This analysis confirmed that Ki67, ER, and PR showed higher percent nuclear staining in CBs than in SRTs from the same patients. The difference for Ki67 was more striking and unidirectional. ER and PR cases clustered at the upper percent levels. Histograms with a bin-width of 15% show a peak at 15% for Ki67 difference between CBs and SRTs, whereas the peaks for ER and PR differences were at 0%. McNemar's (or Exact McNemar’s) test showed significant differences between the binary status calls for Ki67 (p = 3.2E-15) and ER (p = 0.012), but not for PR (p = 0.65). Assays on CBs and SRTs resulted in different subtype calls for the cases (Table 1). Grade distributions were different between LA and LB (p&lt;0.001 for both CB- and SRT-based subtypes, Chi-Square or Fisher's Exact test), but not so between LB1 and LB2 (p = 0.23 for CB, 0.31 for SRT). However, SRT-based LB1 cases concentrate more on higher grades compared to CB-based cases (p = 0.048).

Table 1. ER+ subtypes based on IHC assays (from CBs and SRTs) and corresponding grades (from SRTs) CBSRTSubtypeG1G2G3G1G2G3LA2126034518LB11435342820LB2036032

Discussion On IHC assays, Ki67 expression is strikingly higher in CBs than in SRTs, and ER expression is also higher in CBs than in SRTs. This directly resulted in more LB than LA subtypes based on CBs. SRT-based LB1 cases concentrate more on higher grades compared to CB-based cases, which is more consistent with the observation that LB subtypes have worse outcomes. A limitation of this study is that technical differences between the labs may contribute to the observed differences between CBs and SRTs. Further studies need to be performed to determine whether SRT should also be assayed in addition to CB for treatment regimen decision-making.

The views expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Defense, or US Government.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P4-06-03.

Is oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) of prognostic value once HER2-positive and. low-ER expression patients are removed?

Oncotype DX has been criticized for not providing significantly more prognostic information than histopathologic analysis. Oncotype DX was validated in cohorts that included poor prognostic factors (HER2-positive, low-estrogen receptor [ER] expression), raising the question: if patients with known high recurrence rates are excluded, is the Recurrence Score (RS) still valid? Our purpose was to determine if RS can be predicted with readily available measures. One hundred and twenty samples from August 2006 to November 2010 that underwent Oncotype DX testing were analyzed. Data included RS, ER, progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki67 status by immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC data were used to create two linear regression models to predict RS. SAS's JMP-7 was used for statistical analysis. When comparing Oncotype DX- and IHC-derived ER and PR values, there were 21 discordant samples. The linear regression model PRS-F created with IHC data (ER, PR, HER2, Ki67) from all samples (n = 120) had an adjusted R(2) = 0.60 indicating a good model for predicting RS. The PRS-R model was built without low-ER and HER2-positive samples (n = 110). It had an adjusted R(2) = 0.38 indicating poor prediction of RS. Oncotype DX data showed good concordance with IHC for ER- and PR-expression in this cohort. Low-ER samples had high RS. After removing low-ER and HER2-positives, calculating RS with PRS-R from remaining data showed poor predictive power for RS (adjusted R(2) = 0.38). This result questions whether RS is prognostic in this subgroup (who would most benefit from further clarification of recurrence risk) and independent of pathology, or is simply producing random RS values. Data bases available to Genomic Health can resolve this issue.

Abstract OT2-1-04: Intraoperative assessment of tumor margins with a new optical imaging technology: A multi-center, randomized, blinded clinical trial

Background: Partial mastectomy is the most commonly performed procedure for invasive breast cancer and is associated with a reexcision rate commonly ranging from 20% to 40% in the literature. This high rate of reexcision is associated with significant additional cost (estimated over $4,000 per reexcision) and lower quality outcomes.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a high-resolution imaging technology that images tissue structure with micron-scale resolution – on the same scale as histopathology. It is similar to ultrasound except it uses near infra-red light waves instead of sound waves to create detailed images several millimeters deep into tissue. Although widely used in ophthalmology with growing use in cardiovascular imaging, high-resolution OCT imaging has a narrow depth of focus and requires instrumentation that is not well suited for intraoperative use. Drawing from OCT technology, interferometric synthetic aperture microscopy (ISAM) is a computational imaging technique that creates high-resolution, always in-focus images in software with basic optical instrumentation. A high-resolution ISAM probe and imaging system has been developed for intraoperative imaging of tissue structure and has the potential to broadly impact intraoperative assessment of tumor margins. Intraoperative ISAM imaging of the excised breast cancer specimen margins and in vivo imaging within the surgical cavity may reduce the high rate of reexcision associated with partial mastectomy.

Trial Design: The trial design is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, double arm study comparing the reexcision rate of standard of care partial mastectomy versus the reexcision rate of standard of care partial mastectomy plus intraoperative ISAM imaging.

Inclusion Criteria: Women histologically diagnosed with invasive carcinoma of the breast (invasive ductal or lobular)Undergoing partial mastectomy (lumpectomy) procedureAge 18 years or more

Exclusion Criteria Multicentric diseaseBilateral diseaseNeoadjuvant systemic therapyAll T4 tumorsPrevious radiation in the operated breastPrior surgical procedure in the same quadrantImplants in the operated breastPregnancyLactationParticipating in any other investigational study which can influence collection of valid data

Primary Endpoints Measure of surgical reexcision rateRate of tumor at final surgical marginsSecondary EndpointsVolume of tissue excisedClinical and economic measures of addressing asymmetry

Statistical Methods: The trial is designed to show superiority of the ISAM imaging arm to the standard of care. Statistical design is two group, continuity corrected chi-squared test of equal proportions with 90% power and alpha=0.05. The trial design assumes a baseline reoperation rate in the standard of care arm of 24% with at least a 50% reduction in the ISAM imaging arm.

Present Accrual and Target Accrual

Not yet recruiting. Target accrual is 230 patients in the partial mastectomy + imaging arm and 230 patients in the standard of care partial mastectomy arm.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-1-04.

Does breast tumor heterogeneity necessitate further immunohistochemical staining on surgical specimens?

BACKGROUND

Prognostic and predictive tumor markers in breast cancer are most commonly performed on core needle biopsies (CNB) of the primary tumor. Because treatment recommendations are influenced by these markers, it is imperative to verify strong concordance between tumor markers on CNB specimens and the corresponding surgical specimens (SS).

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study was performed on 165 women (205 samples) with breast cancer diagnosed from January 2009 to July 2011. Tumor type, grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), and Ki67 expression by immunohistochemical (IHC) testing were retrospectively analyzed in the CNB and SS. Contingency tables and agreement modeling were performed.

RESULTS

There was substantial agreement between the CNB and SS for PR% and HER2; moderate agreement for tumor type, grade, and ER%; and fair agreement for Ki67%. In 8% of patients (n = 13), tumor heterogeneity was seen. In heterogeneous tumors the overall concordance between the CNB and SS was worse, especially for HER2. Six of these patients had areas of tumor that were positive for HER2, which were not detected in their CNBs. Nine patients had multiple distinct molecular subtypes within their tumor(s).

CONCLUSIONS

The heterogeneous distribution of antigens in breast cancer tumors raises concern that the CNB may not adequately represent the true biologic profile in all patients. There is strong concordance for tumor type, ER, and PR between CNB and SS (although a quantitative decline was noted from CNB to SS); however, HER2 activity does not appear to be adequately detected on CNB in patients with heterogeneous tumors. These data suggest that IHC testing on the CNB alone may not be adequate to tailor targeted therapy in all patients.

Reduced re-excisions while conserving tissue volume resected in DCIS patients

144

Background: The ability to obtain negative margins with a single surgical procedure remains a challenge, particularly in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Many techniques have been reported to lower the positive margin rate, at a cost of additional tissue resected. A novel device (MarginProbe, Dune Medical Devices, Inc.) is intended to provide surgeons with real time, intraoperative detection of cancerous tissues at the margins of excised specimens. An analysis was performed to determine the impact on tissue volume of the previously reported improvement in candidates for re-excision associated with device use for patients with a DCIS component. Methods: 596 patients undergoing breast conservation using wire localization were randomized in a prospective, international, multicenter (n=21) study. Randomization occurred in the operating room, following standard of care lumpectomy, including palpation and any indicated additional resections. Positive readings required additional resections of the cavity; device was used on main lumpectomy specimen only. Pathologists were blinded to study arm. Tissue volume of all specimens and resections was recorded. Since reducing candidates for re-excision requires removing additional tissue associated with cancer, we looked at total tissue volume removed across all surgeries, to assess the final impact to the patient. Results: Total tissue volumes removed during all surgeries (lumpectomy and re-excisions) for patients with DCIS alone was similar between the study group and control group, while the decrease in candidates for re-excision was significant (13% vs. 37%, p=0.004). For patients with DCIS and invasive carcinoma, the total volume excised was also similar, and the decrease in re-excision candidates was significant (13% vs. 33%, p<0.001). Conclusions: Unlike other techniques for reducing re-excisions, device use does not require an increase in tissue volume to achieve a significant reduction in the number of candidates for re-excision. [Table: see text]

P3-12-02: Intra-Operative Margin Assessment of Diffuse Disease with MarginProbe” as an Adjunct to Standard of Care, Results from a Randomized Prospective Multi Center Study

Background

The ability to obtain negative margins with a single surgical procedure remains a challenge, particularly in patients with diffuse disease such as DCIS and lobular pathology. A novel device (MarginProbe, Dune Medical Devices, Inc.) is intended to provide surgeons with real time, intraoperative detection of cancerous tissues at the margins of excised specimens. A study was performed to determine if there was a device-associated improvement in complete surgical resection (CSR) and therefore a decrease in the rate of patients requiring re-excision with these disease types. The current analysis stratified the data based on tumor type with a special focus on DCIS patients, patient with a DCIS component, and lobular patients.

Methods: All 596 patients underwent breast conservation, with image-guided localization, and were randomized in a prospective, international, multicenter (n=21) study. Randomization occurred in the operating room, following standard lumpectomy procedure, including palpation followed by additional cavity resections as indicated. In the device arm, MarginProbe was used on each specimen margin and device positive readings required additional resections of the cavity. Pathologists were blinded to study arm. Re-excision criteria were not dictated by the protocol.

A primary endpoint of this study was CSR, defined as the correct intraoperative identification and resection (if not skin or fascia) of all positive margins on the main lumpectomy specimen. Positive lumpectomy specimens were defined as those having at least one margin having cancer ≤1mm from the surface. Successful CSR results in reduced positive margin rate after lumpectomy.

Results: Results are presented in Table 1. The improvement in CSR was significant for all diagnosis types. The decrease in candidates for re-excision due to failed CSR was significant for all DCIS and mixed tumor types.

Use of a novel device to reduce positive margins for ductal carcinoma in situ

87

Background: The ability to obtain negative margins with a single surgical procedure remains a challenge, particularly in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). A novel device (MarginProbe, Dune Medical Devices, Inc.) is intended to provide surgeons with real-time, intraoperative detection of cancerous tissues at the margins of excised specimens. A study was performed to determine if there was a device-associated improvement in complete surgical resection (CSR) and therefore a decreased re-excision rate in patients with a DCIS component.

Methods: 596 patients who were undergoing breast conservation using needle localization were randomized in a prospective, international, multicenter (n=21) study. Randomization occurred in the operating room, following standard of care lumpectomy, including palpation followed by indicated additional cavity resections. Device positive readings required additional resections of the cavity. Pathologists were blinded to study arm. A primary endpoint of this study was CSR, defined as the correct intraoperative identification and resection (if not skin or fascia) of all positive margins on the main lumpectomy specimen. Positive lumpectomy specimens were those having at least one margin having cancer ≤1mm from the surface. Successful CSR results in reduced positive margin rate after lumpectomy.

Results: The improvement in CSR was significant for each diagnosis (p<0.0001). The decrease in candidates for reexcision due to failed CSR was significant for all pathology involving DCIS (p<0.0001). Overall results are presented in the table.

Conclusions: Device use delivered significant improvement in CSR and therefore a significant decrease in reexcision rates for patients with DCIS. Further studies need to be conducted evaluating the use of the device on additional margins that the surgeon may resect or in the actual cavity.

[Table: see text]

Abstract P4-06-09: Genetic Signature Discriminating Metastatic from Non-Metastatic Small Tumors

Background: The widespread use of mammographic screening resulted in increased diagnosis of small (&lt;2 cm; T1) tumors. Small tumors are associated with better prognosis, including a lower likelihood of developing metastasis, than larger tumors. Although this lower propensity to metastasize suggests that less aggressive treatments may be warranted in patients with T1 tumors, a subset of patients with small tumors (10-20%) will be diagnosed with lymph node metastasis.

Methods: Frozen breast specimens were collected from women with T1 tumors and either negative (n=29) or positive (n=15) lymph node status. RNA was isolated from pure tumor cell populations after laser microdissection. Gene expression data was generated using HG U133A 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix). Differential expression was determined using Mann-Whitney testing using a P-value &lt; 0.001 to define significance. Results for ESR1 were validated by immunohistochemistry.

Results: Tumor characteristics did not differ significantly between groups in terms of age at diagnosis, grade, HER2 or PR status; however, tumors from patients with positive lymph nodes (47%) were significantly (P&lt;0.05) more frequently ER negative compared to node negative (14%) patients. Gene expression analysis revealed 17 genes that were differentially expressed between node negative and node positive tumors: 6 with higher expression in node positive, including AURKA, and 11 with higher expression in node negative patients, including ESR1 and EPHX2. Of note, ESR1 was expressed at &gt;4X higher levels in tumors without metastasis, in agreement with IHC findings.

Conclusions: Small metastatic tumors differ in gene expression from those without metastasis. EPHX2 has been implicated as a metastasis suppressor while AURKA has been implicated as a metastasis promoter. These results suggest that small tumors have different propensities to metastasize and the genetic signature may serve as a new molecular tool to discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic small tumors, allowing appropriate treatment and risk assessment to be performed.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-06-09.

Abstract P6-04-10: Genetic Discrimination of Aggressive from Indolent DCIS

Background: Treatment options for DCIS vary from surgical excision with or without radiation and/or chemopreventive therapy, or mastectomy. Intuitively, more aggressive treatment options should lead to improved survival rates, however, studies have shown no difference in breast cancer mortality between women treated with wide excision only versus those with excision plus radiation and treatments can be costly, lengthy and associated with side effects. To avoid over-treating women with indolent disease, while intensively treating women with aggressive disease, new molecular tools must be developed to supplement pathological information to classify DCIS lesions and predict clinical outcome.

Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) pure DCIS biopsy specimens were collected from the pathology archives of the Anne Arundel Medical Center. Samples included those with poor prognosis characterized by either recurrence of DCIS or progression to invasive cancer (n=7) and those good prognosis, having ≥5-year disease-free survival (n=10). RNA was isolated after laser-microdissection of pure tumor cells and hybridized to Breast Cancer DSA™ microarrays (Almac Diagnostics). S-way ANOVA was used to account for batch effects and then Support Vector Machine (SVM) was used to identify candidate genes effective at discriminating good from poor prognosis DCIS. Pathway analysis was performed using MetaCore (GeneGeo).

Results: 328 genes were found to be differentially expressed between good and poor prognosis specimens (P&lt;0.01). Preliminary analysis with SVM found that a 70-gene candidate signature from these 328 genes wasoptimal under the tested conditions for discriminating favorable from poor prognosis DCIS. This candidate signature included genes such as MEF2C, PTK2 and ZBTB2. Pathway analysis revealed that genes involved in cytoskeleton modeling, apoptosis and survival, DNA damage repair and cell adhesion are expressed at lower levels in poor prognosis DCIS while those involved in cell cycle, immune response and cell proliferation are expressed at higher levels.

Conclusions: While studies have attempted to identify molecular profiles associated with aggressive DCIS by comparing DCIS co-occurring with invasive disease to pure DCIS, to our knowledge, this is the first study that identified a candidate molecular signature of prognosis in pure DCIS. Although many of the 70 genes found to differ between favorable and poor prognosis DCIS have not been previously associated with breast cancer or have unknown function, MEF2C and PTK2 have been implicated in invasion and migration, while ZBTB2 is a master regulator of p53 and stimulates cellular proliferation. These data demonstrate aggressive DCIS do differ from indolent DCIS at the genetic level and that these differences may be useful in developing molecular tools to classify DCIS lesions and guide appropriate treatment.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-04-10.

Long-term follow-up study of a prospective multicenter sentinel node trial: molecular detection of breast cancer sentinel node metastases

BACKGROUND

This prospective multicenter sentinel lymph node (SLN) trial investigated whether molecular analysis would improve the detection of SLN metastases and their prognostic value. We report mammaglobin quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) results and clinical outcome for 547 patients (mean follow-up 7 years).

METHODS

Breast cancer patients (excluding stage IV disease or palpable nodes) were enrolled from 1996 to 2005 at 16 institutional review board-approved sites. Alternate 2-mm serial sections of each SLN were examined by hematoxylin and eosin staining with or without immunohistochemistry at multiple levels or blinded and assayed by Taqman qRT-PCR according to previously established thresholds.

RESULTS

Mammaglobin remains a highly specific (99%), sensitive (97% primary tumor; 82% N1 SLN) marker for breast cancer. Mammaglobin SLN expression was associated with other prognostic factors, was detected in most patients with distant recurrence (48 of 79; 61%), and was associated with decreased recurrence-free survival (log rank P < 0.0001). Molecular analysis upstaged 13% (52 of 394) node-negative (N0) patients who exhibited a significantly lower distant recurrence-free survival compared to node-negative, PCR-negative patients (80 vs. 91%; P < 0.04). N0 patients with PCR-positive SLN were 3.4 times more likely to experience relapse than PCR-negative patients (odds ratio 3.4; 95% confidence interval 1.6-7.1; P = 0.001). However, molecular staging failed to predict most of the N0 patient recurrences (25 of 34) and was not a statistically significant independent predictor of distant recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, these data are the first to prospectively compare PCR detection of SLN metastases with long-term outcome in breast cancer patients. Molecular staging of SLN detected clinically significant disease missed by standard pathology. Further refinement and optimization of molecular staging is indicated to improve clinical utility.

American Society of Clinical Oncology-recommended surveillance and physician specialty among long-term breast cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether it is appropriate to transfer the follow-up care of breast cancer (BrCa) survivors from cancer specialists to primary care physicians (PCPs). This contemporary study compared physician specialty and documented the long-term surveillance of survivors who underwent surgery at an American academic center.

METHODS

Women in this institutional review board-approved study underwent breast surgery between 1996 and 2006. Data were collected for 270 patients with stage I to III BrCa (mean follow-up, 6 years). Charts were reviewed based on American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines for recommended surveillance frequency and care.

RESULTS

The majority of patients (90%; n = 242) were followed by specialists with 10% (n = 28) followed by PCPs. Patients with advanced disease and a greater risk of disease recurrence more often received specialist care. Patients followed by specialists were more often seen at ASCO-recommended intervals (eg, 89% vs 69% of patients followed by a PCP at follow-up Year 6; P < .01); however, many patients were followed inconsistently. Breast disease was often not the focus of PCP visits or mentioned in clinic notes (18% patients). Women seen by specialists were more likely to have documented clinical examinations of the breast (93% vs 44% at Year 6), axilla (94% vs 52%), or annual mammograms (74% vs 48%; P = .001-.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent compliance with surveillance guidelines and chart documentation needs improvement among all providers; however, specialists more consistently met ASCO guidelines. If transfer of care to a PCP occurs, it should be formalized and include follow-up recommendations and defined physician responsibilities. Providers and patients should be educated regarding surveillance care and current guidelines incorporated into standard clinical practice.

Prognostic implications of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in sentinel nodes of patients with invasive breast cancer: 10-year analysis of patients enrolled in the prospective East Carolina University/Anne Arundel Medical Center Sentinel Node Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a more sensitive and accurate nodal staging procedure than axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Because of increased pathologic evaluation in the sentinel node era, more nodal micrometastases (MIC) (> 0.2 mm to 2 mm) and isolated tumor cells (ITC; < or = 0.2 mm) have been identified. We present the 10-year analysis of our prospective SLN study, focusing on regional axillary node status and distant metastases in patients with nodal ITC and MIC.

STUDY DESIGN

From 1996 to 2005, breast cancer patients were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved, multicenter study. SLNs were examined at multiple levels by hematoxylin and eosin; most (85%) hematoxylin and eosin-negative SLNs were also examined by cytokeratin immunohistochemistry. Data from 1,259 patients with invasive breast cancer and in whom an SLN was found were reviewed for this analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 1,259 patients, 893 (71%) had negative SLNs, 25 (2%) had ITCs, 57 (5%) had MIC, and 284 (23%) had positive SLNs. None of the 13 patients with ITCs who underwent an ALND had additional positive nodes, compared with 27% (11 of 41) of patients with MIC. At a mean followup of 4.9 years, the distant recurrence rates for SLN-negative, ITC, MIC, and SLN-positive groups were 6%, 8%, 14%, and 21%, respectively. The presence of MIC in the SLN was associated with a significantly shorter disease-free interval than was SLN negativity (p < 0.02 by Cox regression model).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective breast cancer study found that sentinel node MIC, but not ITCs, were associated with additional positive nodes and with distant recurrence. These data suggest that ALND may be unnecessary in patients with ITCs. But ALND and more aggressive adjuvant therapy should be considered in patients with SLN micrometastases.

Prospective randomized study comparing cryo-assisted and needle-wire localization of ultrasound-visible breast tumors

BACKGROUND

This study compared the surgical results of 2 localization methods-cryo-assisted localization (CAL) and needle-wire localization (NWL)-in patients undergoing breast lumpectomy for breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 310 patients were treated in an institutional review board-approved study with 18 surgeons at 17 sites. Patients were randomized 2:1 to undergo either intraoperative CAL or NWL. A cryoprobe was inserted under ultrasound guidance in the operating room and an ice ball created an 8- to 10-mm margin around the lesion. The palpable ice ball then was dissected. NWL was placed according to institutional practice and resection was performed in a standard fashion. Surgical margins, complications, re-excisions, tissue volume, procedure times, ease of localization, specimen quality, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Positive margins were defined as any type of disease present 1 mm or less from any specimen edge.

RESULTS

Positive margin status did not differ between the 2 groups (28% vs. 31%). The volume of tissue removed was significantly less in the CAL group (49 vs. 66 mL, P = .002). Re-excisions were similar in both groups. CAL was superior in ease of lumpectomy, quality of specimen, acute surgical cosmesis, short-term cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and overall procedure time for the patient. CAL had a lower invasive positive margin rate (11% vs. 20%, P = .039) but a higher observed ductal carcinoma in situ-positive margin rate (30% vs. 18%, approaching statistical significance, P = .052).

CONCLUSIONS

CAL is a preferred alternative to standard wire localization because it provides a palpable template, removes less tissue and improves cosmesis, decreases overall procedure time, and is more convenient for the patient and surgeon.