Bortezomib-based therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation: Czech Registry Data

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the use of bortezomib in different combination regimens in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients who were transplant ineligible.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from the Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG) of the Czech Myeloma Group (CMG) to provide real-world evidence of outcome for 794 newly diagnosed MM transplant ineligible patients. The most frequently used regimen was VCd (bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone) (47.5%) over VMP (bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone) (21.7%), BDd (bortezomib-doxorubicin-dexamethasone) (9.8%), and VTd (bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone) (2.9%).

RESULTS

The overall response rate (ORR) was 69.2% (478/691), including 12.6% (≥ CR); 34.7% very good partial responses (VGPR); and 21.9% partial responses (PR). Among triplet regimens, VMP was the most effective regimen compared to VCd, BDd, and VTd. Median PFS was 22.3 vs. 18.5 vs. 13.7 vs. 13.8 mo, (P = .275), respectively, and median OS was 49 vs. 41.7 vs. 37.9 vs. 32.2 mo (P = .004), respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were anemia in 17.4% and infections in 18% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that bortezomib-based treatment is effective and safe in NDMM transplant ineligible patients, especially VMP, which was identified as superior between bortezomib-based induction regimens not only in clinical trials, but also in real clinical practice.

Final Overall Survival Analysis of the TOURMALINE-MM1 Phase III Trial of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

The double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival with ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib-Rd) versus placebo-Rd in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We report the final analyses for overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to ixazomib-Rd (n = 360) or placebo-Rd (n = 362), stratified by number of prior therapies (1 v 2 or 3), previous proteasome inhibitor (PI) exposure (yes v no), and International Staging System disease stage (I or II v III). OS (intent-to-treat population) was a key secondary end point.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 85 months, median OS with ixazomib-Rd versus placebo-Rd was 53.6 versus 51.6 months (hazard ratio, 0.939; P = .495). Lower hazard ratios, indicating larger magnitude of OS benefit with ixazomib-Rd versus placebo-Rd, were seen in predefined subgroups: refractory to any (0.794) or last (0.742) treatment line; age > 65-75 years (0.757); International Staging System stage III (0.779); 2/3 prior therapies (0.845); high-risk cytogenetics (0.870); and high-risk cytogenetics and/or 1q21 amplification (0.862). Following ixazomib-Rd versus placebo-Rd, 71.7% versus 69.9% of patients received ≥ 1 anticancer therapy, of whom 24.7% versus 33.9% received daratumumab and 71.8% versus 76.9% received PIs (next-line therapy: 47.5% v 55.8%). Rates of new primary malignancies were similar with ixazomib-Rd (10.3%) and placebo-Rd (11.9%). There were no new or additional safety concerns.

CONCLUSION

Median OS values in both arms were the longest reported in phase III studies of Rd-based triplets in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma at the time of this analysis; progression-free survival benefit with ixazomib-Rd versus placebo-Rd did not translate into a statistically significant OS benefit on intent-to-treat analysis. OS benefit was greater in subgroups with adverse prognostic factors. OS interpretation was confounded by imbalances in subsequent therapies received, especially PIs and daratumumab.

ANCHOR (OP-104): Melflufen plus dexamethasone (dex) and bortezomib (BTZ) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)—Optimal dose, updated efficacy and safety results

8037

Background: Development of resistance to standard treatments for RRMM highlights the need for novel therapies. Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate (PDC) that leverages aminopeptidases and rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen + dex showed clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in HORIZON (Richardson et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 9 [Epub]). This is an update of the BTZ arm of the phase 1/2a ANCHOR study (NCT03481556). Methods: Patients (pts) with RRMM were intolerant or refractory to a prior IMiD, with 1-4 prior lines of therapy (LoTs). Prior treatment with a proteasome inhibitor (PI) was allowed, but pts could not be refractory to PIs in the last LoT. Melflufen (30, 40, or 20 mg intravenously; d 1 of each 28-d cycle) was administered with BTZ (1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneous) + oral dex (20 mg on d 1, 4, 8, and 11 and 40 mg on d 15 and 22; dex dose reduced if aged ≥ 75 y). The primary objective in phase 1 was to determine the optimal phase 2 dose of melflufen for this combination. Results: As of the data cutoff date (October 19, 2020), 13 pts received melflufen (30 mg, n = 6; 40 mg, n = 7) + dex and BTZ. In the 30 mg and 40 mg cohorts, respectively, median age was 78.5 y (range, 70-82) and 70.0 y (range, 61-76); median prior LoTs was 3.5 (range, 2-4) and 2.0 (range, 1-4); 33% and 50% of evaluable pts had high-risk cytogenetics; 83% and 71% were refractory to last LoT; 100% and 86% received a prior PI; 33% and 14% were refractory to PIs. In the 30 mg and 40 mg cohorts, respectively, median treatment duration was 6.5 mo (range, 1.4-29.0) and 8.7 mo (range, 2.1-19.6); 4 (67%) and 4 pts (57%) were still on treatment; 2 and 3 pts discontinued (30 mg: progressive disease [PD] and other [1 pt each]; 40 mg: adverse event [AE], lack of efficacy, and PD [1 pt each]). Confirmed overall response rate in the 30 mg and 40 mg cohorts, respectively, was 50% (1 very good partial response [VGPR] and 2 partial response [PR]) and 71% (1 complete response, 3 VGPR, and 1 PR). Most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were thrombocytopenia (30 mg: 50%; 40 mg: 100%) and neutropenia (30 mg: 33%; 40 mg: 71%); grade 3/4 nonhematologic TRAEs were infrequent; 3 pts discontinued study treatment due to treatment-emergent AEs (30 mg: cardiac failure chronic and osteolysis [1 pt each]; 40 mg: thrombocytopenia [1 pt]). Serious TRAEs occurred in 2 pts (33%) in the 30 mg cohort (neutropenia and pneumonia [1 pt], syncope [1 pt]) and 1 pt (14%) in the 40 mg cohort (thrombocytopenia and neutropenia). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred at either dose level. Fatal AEs occurred in 1 pt in the 30 mg cohort (cardiac failure chronic; unrelated to study treatment). Conclusions: ANCHOR determined that the optimal dose of melflufen is 30 mg + dex and BTZ; results showed clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts. Recruitment is ongoing; updated data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03481556.

LIGHTHOUSE (OP-108): A phase 3 study of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone (dex) and daratumumab (dara) versus dara in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients (pts)

TPS8051

Background: Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate (PDC) that leverages aminopeptidases and rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen + dex showed clinical efficacy and was well tolerated in pts with heavily pretreated RRMM (HORIZON; Richardson et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 9 [Epub]). The ongoing phase 1/2 ANCHOR study (OP-104) established the optimal dose for melflufen + dex and dara, showing meaningful clinical activity and manageable safety at both melflufen doses tested in pts with RRMM (Ocio et al. ASH 2020. Oral 417). The aim of this study (OP-108; NCT04649060) is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of melflufen + dex and dara vs dara in pts with RRMM previously treated with an IMiD and a proteasome inhibitor (PI), similar to the indication for dara monotherapy. Methods: Pt enrollment has begun (N = 240 planned). Pts must be ≥ 18 y, double refractory to (or intolerant of) an IMiD and a PI or had ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy (LoTs) including an IMiD and a PI, have measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2. Pts with primary refractory disease and refractoriness to an anti-CD38 antibody are excluded. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to open-label melflufen + dex and dara (Arm A) or single-agent dara (Arm B) until progressive disease [PD] or unacceptable toxicity, stratified by prior LoT number. Pts in Arm B with PD can opt to receive Arm A triplet therapy. Arm A: melflufen 30 mg intravenously on d 1 of each 28-d cycle; dex 40 mg/wk orally (20 mg if aged ≥ 75 y); dara 1800 mg subcutaneously on d 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1 and 2, d 1 and 15 of cycles 3-6, and d 1 of cycles 7+. Arm B: dara at the same dosage as Arm A. Primary objective: superiority ( P value from the 2-sided statistical test < 0.05; upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the hazard ratio < 1) of progression-free survival (PFS) in pts treated with triplet therapy vs dara. An estimated sample of 240 pts with 160 expected events (PD or death) and 15% assumed dropout rate would provide 90% power at a 2-sided log rank test at 5% significance level to detect a hazard ratio for death of 0.6. Key secondary endpoints: overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response [PR]), duration of response, and safety. Response will be assessed by a blinded independent review committee based on International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Other secondary endpoints: clinical benefit rate (≥ minimal response), time to response, time to progression, time to next treatment, and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include: minimal residual disease in pts achieving ≥ very good PR, PFS following next line of treatment (PFS-2), pt-reported outcomes, pharmacokinetics, translational biomarkers, response rate in pts with extramedullary disease, and efficacy (including ORR) in Arm B pts who receive Arm A triplet therapy after PD. Clinical trial information: NCT04649060.

Survival among older patients with previously treated multiple myeloma treated with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (XVd) in the BOSTON study

8019

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) typically affects older populations, which are more vulnerable to toxicity with anti-MM treatments. These patients (pts) have significant morbidity and mortality, resulting in a need for dose modifications or alternative suboptimal treatment options. Significant improvements were observed in the BOSTON study with XVd vs Vd in median progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and rates of peripheral neuropathy (PN); median overall survival (OS) trended in favor of XVd. Methods: The phase 3 randomized BOSTON trial (NCT03110562) is a controlled, open-label study of once weekly XVd vs. twice weekly standard Vd in pts with MM and 1-3 prior treatment regimens. We performed post-hoc analyses to compare survival benefits in pts ≥65 vs < 65 years of age. Results: The BOSTON study enrolled a total of 402 pts between June 2017 and February 2019 that were randomized into XVd or Vd arms. The numbers of pts treated with XVd or Vd who were ≥65 were 109/132 and 86/75 who were < 65, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar by age although pts ≥65 years were less likely to have received ASCT than those < 65 years (48.4% vs. 25.3%). Median PFS was prolonged with XVd compared with Vd, across both age groups: ≥65 (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.37-0.83] P = 0.002) and < 65, (HR, 0. 74 [95% CI, 0.49-1.11], P = 0.07). Vd was associated with a lower ORR (64.4%) than treatment with XVd (76.1%) (OR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.00-3.11], P = 0.024) in pts ≥65, while the ORR in those < 65 was 76.7% with XVd and 58.7% (OR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.18-4.59], P = 0.007) with Vd. As of Jan 2021, the median OS for the overall population was not reached for both arms (HR = 0.86; p = 0.193), with 61 and 75 deaths in the XVd and Vd arms, respectively. Median OS was not reached in pts ≥65 with XVd and was 28.6 months with Vd (HR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.94; p = 0.012), while there was no difference in the OS for pts < 65 (HR = 1.52; 95% CI, 0.86-2.68; p = 0.926). Pts ≥65 had a lower incidence of death with XVd as compared to Vd (29 vs 56) and there were 32 deaths with XVd and 19 with Vd in pts < 65. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were not observed more often in older compared to younger pts. Amongst pts ≥65, PN of any grade was lower with XVd (32.1%) compared to Vd (46.5%); (OR 0.57 [95% CI 0.34-0.97], p = 0.017), including a lower incidence of grade ≥3 PN (XVd 4.6% vs. Vd 11.6%). Pts < 65 followed a similar trend of PN AEs of any grade: XVd, 32.6%; Vd, 48.0% (OR 0.42 [95% CI 0.21-0.82], p = 0.006). Conclusions: In an older patient population with a poor prognosis, XVd was associated with a significant survival benefit, improved PFS and OR with reduced PN, and requires relatively short and infrequent clinic visits. XVd may be a simple, effective regimen for pts ≥65 years of age. Clinical trial information: NCT03110562.

Effects of refractory status to lenalidomide on safety and efficacy of selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (XVd) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma

8024

Background: Lenalidomide (LEN) is typically a frontline therapy for newly diagnosed MM. Patients (pts) with MM refractory to LEN are less likely to repond to other IMiDs and represent a signification area of unmet medical need. In the BOSTON study in the ITT population, XVd was associated with significant improvements in median progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and rates of peripheral neuropathy, with trends in overall survival (OS) favoring XVd. Methods: The BOSTON trial (NCT03110562) is a Phase 3 randomized, controlled, open-label study of once weekly XVd vs twice weekly Vd in pts with MM and 1-3 prior therapies. We performed post-hoc analyses on two different subgroups to compare outcomes based on refractory status to LEN and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) therapy. These post hoc analyses evaluated if PFS, overall response rate (ORR), time to next treatment (TTNT) and safety was influenced by prior treatment with LEN when comparing XVd with Vd. Results: Amongst the 402 pts in BOSTON, 160 had MM refractory to any IMiD (XVd = 74, Vd = 86). Of those, 106 were documented to be refractory to LEN (XVd = 53, Vd = 53) and 296 were not refractory to LEN (XVd = 142, Vd = 154). Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between subgroups. In these subgroups based on refractory status to IMiD or LEN, median PFS was significantly longer in the XVd arm as compared to Vd (IMiD refractory, 13.9 vs. 8.4 months (mo), p = 0.005; LEN refractory, 10.2 vs. 7.1 mo, p = 0.012; not LEN refractory, 15.4 vs 9.6 mo, p = 0.014). Significant increases in TTNT were observed with XVd treatment in pts that were IMiD refractory (14.8 vs. 10.2 mo, p = 0.003), LEN refractory (13.0 vs. 7.6 mo, p = 0.015), and not refractory to LEN (19.1 vs 12.9 mo, p = 0.005). ORR was improved with XVd compared to Vd regardless of refractory status (IMiD refractory, 68.9% vs 55.8%, p = 0.045; LEN refractory, 67.9% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.016; and not refractory to LEN, 79.6% vs 67.5%, p = 0.010). The most common treatment-emergent AEs for the XVd/Vd arms for all subgroups were thrombocytopenia (66.2/30.6%; 71.7/40.4%; 55.6/22.4%), nausea (48.6/11.8%; 50.9/11.5%; 50.0/9.2%), and fatigue (40.5/20.0%; 45.3/21.2%; 40.8/17.1%) for IMiD, LEN, and not LEN refractory, respectively. Incidence of PN AEs of any grade were reduced compared to pts treated with Vd (IMiD refractory, 27% vs. 42.4%; LEN refractory, 30.2% vs 36.5%; not refractory, LEN 33.1% vs 50.7%). Conclusions: In pts with previously treated MM, PFS, ORR, and TTNT were significantly improved regardless of documented refractory status to any IMiD or to LEN-specifically. These analyses support the use of the XVd combination for pts with disease refractory to LEN and likely to any IMiD. Clinical trial information: NCT03110562.

Ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in routine clinical practice: effectiveness in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in routine clinical practice. Patients & methods: Patient-level data from the global, observational INSIGHT MM and the Czech Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies were integrated and analyzed. Results: At data cut-off, 263 patients from 13 countries were included. Median time from diagnosis to start of IRd was 35.8 months; median duration of follow-up was 14.8 months. Overall response rate was 73%, median progression-free survival, 21.2 months and time-to-next therapy, 33.0 months. Ixazomib/lenalidomide dose reductions were required in 17%/36% of patients; 32%/30% of patients discontinued ixazomib/lenalidomide due to adverse events. Conclusion: The effectiveness and safety of IRd in routine clinical practice are comparable to those reported in TOURMALINE-MM1. Clinical trial registration: NCT02761187 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Complete remission of necrobiotic xanthogranuloma after disappearance of monoclonal immunoglobulin induced by bortezomib, lenalidomid and dexamethasone

Necrobiotic xanthogranuloma (NXG) is a rare chronic condition, belonging to the group non-Langerhans cell histiocytoses, which is relevant due to the possibility of extracutaneous involvement and association with systemic diseases, particularly monoclonal gammopathy, MGUS and multiple myeloma. The case reported here NXG was diagnosed after 1 years of evolution in patient with asymptomatic multiple myeloma. After treatment with bortezomib, lenalidomid and dexamethasone, there was evident abrupt decrease of monoclonal immunoglobulin to not measurable level (complete remission of multiple myeloma) and in the same time was evident disappearance of cutaneous and hepatic lesions of NXG on FDG-PET/CT. The etiopathogenetic association of monoclonal immunoglobulin with NXG is documented in this case report with disappearance of NXG in the time of disappearance of monoclonal immunoglobulin.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome) Part I. Pathophysiology, clinical symptoms and recommend screening for vascular malformations

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), also known as Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome, is an autosomal dominant disorder that causes abnormal blood vessel formation. Patients with HHT may have telangiectasias and later may develop arteriovenous malformations in various organs. Pacients suffer from many complications caused by the malformations and therefore by patients with HHT must by performed screening of this arteriovenous malformations. Optimal treatment of this malformations is best delivered throught a multidisciplinary approach. Farmacological treatment is described in next paper.

Unicentric Castlemans disease. Symptoms, diagnostics and therapy

Castleman disease (CD) includes a group of rare and heterogeneous disorders with characteristic lymph node histopathological abnormalities. CD can occur in a single lymph node station, which is referred to as unicentric CD (UCD). CD can also involve multicentric lymphadenopathy and inflammatory symptoms - multicentric Castleman disease. The first-ever diagnostic and treatment guidelines were recently developed for UCD and published 2020. Complete surgical resection is often curative and is therefore the preferred first-line therapy, if possible. The management of unresectable UCD is more challenging. Existing evidence supports that asymptomatic unresectable UCD may be observed. The anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody siltuximab should be considered for unresectable UCD patients with an inflammatory syndrome. Unresectable UCD that is symptomatic because of compression of vital neighbouring structures may be rendered amenable to resection by medical therapy (rituximab, steroids), radiotherapy, or embolization. In this article, we report about the symptoms of this disease and about the diagnostics recommendation published in the International, evidence-based consensus diagnostic criteria for HHV-8-negative/ idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease and about the therapeutic recommendation published in International evidence-based consensus diagnostic and treatment guidelines for unicentric Castleman disease published in the year 2020.

Lymphangiomatosis - very rare disease of the lymphatic vessels

Lymphangiomatosis is rare disease, we can find this entity in differential diagnosis of osteolytic leasions of bones of unknown origin. Typical sign for lymphangiomatosis is proliferation of lymphatic tissue with production of lymphangiomas in various organs and systems. Clinical manifestation of disease is variable, involvement of lungs and bone is typical. In our article we present recent classification of lymphatic tissue neoplasias, their clinical symptoms and treatment possibilities.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (OslerWeberRendu syndrome) - Part II. Pharmacological therapy and international guidelines for the therapy 2020

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia also known as Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome, is an disorder that causes abnormal blood vessel formation with bleeding. Inhibition of angiogenesis amelioretes bleeding complication. Anti-angiogenic agents such as bevacizumab, aflibercept, thalidomid, lenadomid and other new anti-angiogenic thyrosinkinase inhibitors, as well as sirolimus and takrolimus have emerged as a promising systemic or local therapy in reducing bleeding complications but are not curative. Other pharmacological agents include iron supplementation, antifibrinolytics and hormonal treatment. This review concentrates on new anti-agioproliferative drugs with effect in HHT- discusses the new biology of HHT, management issues that face the practising hematologist, and considerations of future directions in HHT treatment.

Transformation of IgM-MGUS into Waldenström´s macroglobulinemia in two of six patients treated for Schnitzler´s syndrome

Transformation of IgM-MGUS into Waldenström´s macroglobulinemia in two of six patients treated for Schnitzler´s syndrome Schnitzler´s syndrome is a very rare, adult-onset, apparently acquired autoinflammatory disease. Chronic urticarial rash and symptoms of systemic inflammation including fever, arthralgia and bone pain with the presence of monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM), rarely IgG, are among hallmarks of the disease. We performed a retrospective study of 6 patients (5 men, 1 woman) diagnosed with Schnitzler´s syndrome fulfilling the Strasbourg criteria who had been treated at our centre in the University Hospital Brno from 2007 to 2021. Median age at diagnosis was 54 (45-67) years, median follow up was 8 (3-14) years. All 6 patients had IgM &#954; monoclonal gammopathy, increased CRP and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate and arthralgia or bone pain, 4 patients suffered from fever, three had leucocytosis 10 × 109/L and lymphadenopathy was found in one patient. 18FDG-PET/CT scan with low-dose total body CT became a part of the initial baseline assessment in 5 patients with suspected Schnitzler´s syndrome, while Na18F-PET/CT was used in one patient to confirm the presence of osteosclerotic leasions as a criterion of the disease. All patients had osteosclerotic or hyperostotic bone lesions detected by low-dose CT examination, with increased 18FDG uptake in illiac and femoral bone marrow. The patient with Na18F-PET/CT scan revealed intensive abnormal tracer uptake with Na18F-PET/CT being more sensitive for detection of osteosclerotic lesions in Schnitzler´s syndrome than 18FDG-PET/CT. All patients were treated with daily subcutaneous anakinra without any adverse events, with excellent clinical results. We observed complete disappearance of urticaria and other symptoms persisting during years of anakinra administration. IgM-MGUS transformed into Waldenström´s macroglobulinemia in two of six patients, but only one patient developed symptoms requiring RBD (Rituximab, Bendamustin, and Dexamethasone) treatment, which induced almost complete remission of the disease. Successful RBD therapy enabled to prolong intervals of maintenance anakinra from 24 to 48 hours with almost complete control of urticarial rash and other symptoms. We suggest close monitoring of patients with Schnitzler´s syndrome to early capture potential transformation into Waldenström´s macroglobulinemia with succesful treatment of both conditions.

Therapy of 3 patients with Erdhiem-Chester disease with cladribin or cladribin in combination with cyclophosphamide. Case report and review of the therapy

Three adult patients with confirmed Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) are followed at our department. Cladribine in monotherapy or in combination with cyclophosphamide were used for first line therapy. The median number of cycles of cladribine or cladribine and cyclophosphamide was 7 (range 6-8). In two cases complete response was achieved, in one case this therapy achieved no response. The duration of response is in one case 11 years, in second case the follow up is too short for evaluation of response duration. In case of no-response to cladribine and cyclophosphamide stabilisation of disease was achieved with anakinra. The tolerance was good without any toxicity grade II and higher. Cladribin and cyclophosphamide is one option for treatment of Erdheim-Chester disease.

Melflufen: A Peptide-Drug Conjugate for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

Despite the availability of new therapies that have led to improved outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma, most patients will eventually relapse. With triplet and even quadruplet combination therapies becoming standard in the first and second line, many patients will have few treatment options after second-line treatment. Melflufen (melphalan flufenamide) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate (PDC) that targets aminopeptidases and rapidly releases alkylating agents into tumor cells. Once inside the tumor cells, melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases to release alkylator molecules, which become entrapped. Melflufen showed anti-myeloma activity in myeloma cells that were resistant to bortezomib and the alkylator melphalan. In early phase studies (O-12-M1 and HORIZON [OP-106]), melflufen plus dexamethasone has demonstrated encouraging clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, including those with triple-class refractory disease and extramedullary disease. The Phase III OCEAN study (OP-104) is further evaluating melflufen plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The safety profile of melflufen is characterized primarily by clinically manageable hematologic adverse events. Melflufen, with its novel mechanism of action, has the potential to provide clinically meaningful benefits to patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, including those with high unmet needs.

Diagnostic relevance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS): Single-center experience

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a known precursor of more serious cancers, such as multiple myeloma (MM), Waldenström macroglobulinemia (MW) and other lymphoproliferative disorders. Using 18F-FDG PET/CT, we aimed to evaluate its benefit in early detection of various accompanying disorders and illnesses in MGUS patients. We prospectively analyzed the diagnostic relevance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in 390 newly diagnosed MGUS patients. On 18F-FDG PET/CT scans, the presence of focal or diffuse areas of detectable increased tracer uptake was recorded in 37 (9.5%) MGUS patients. The most frequent pathology was lymphadenopathy (3.8%), followed by thyroid diseases (2.1%), rheumatic diseases (1.8%), and other solid malignancies (1.5%). These results have major implications for confirmed associations of MGUS with numerous malignant and non-malignant disorders. We believe that 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in newly diagnosed MGUS patients may be useful in early detection of other serious pathologies, not only in predicting progression of MGUS to active MM, and should be strongly recommended if available.

Identification of patients with smouldering multiple myeloma at ultra-high risk of progression using serum parameters: the Czech Myeloma Group model

Smouldering multiple myeloma (SMM) presents without MM defining symptoms. We aimed to identify patients with SMM with an 80% risk of progression within 2 years using only serum parameters. In total, 527 patients with SMM were included and divided into a training group (287 patients from the Czech Myeloma Group [CMG]) and an independent validation group (240 patients from Heidelberg). The median follow-up was 2·4 and 2·5 years, respectively. Progression to MM occurred in 51·9% of the CMG and 38·8% of the Heidelberg patients, respectively. The median risk of progression was 11·0% (CMG) and 9·7% (Heidelberg) per year, during the 5 years after diagnosis. A serum involved/uninvolved free light-chain ratio of >30, immunoparesis, and serum monoclonal (M) protein of ≥2·3 g/dl emerged as powerful predictors of 2-year progression rate with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2·49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1·49-4·17), HR of 2·01 (95% CI 1·36-2·96) and HR of 2·00 (95% CI 1·44-2·79) (P < 0·001) in univariate Cox regression analysis, respectively. Based on this, the CMG model identified patients with SMM with a 2-year risk of progression of 78·7% (95% CI 53·1-95·7; HR 6·8; P < 0·001, CMG) and 81·3% (95% CI 47·1-98·8; HR 38·63; P < 0·001, Heidelberg). Serum parameters in the CMG model allow identification of patients with SMM with an 80% risk of progression to symptomatic MM within 2 years.

Methodology and results of real-world cost-effectiveness of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma using registry data

OBJECTIVE

To predict the real-world (RW) cost-effectiveness of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients after one to three prior therapies.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model that included three health states (progression-free, progressed disease and death) was built. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to discontinuation (TTD) data for the Rd arm were derived using the Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies in the Czech Republic; the relative treatment effects of KRd versus Rd were estimated from the phase 3, randomised, ASPIRE trial, and were used to predict PFS, OS and TTD for KRd. The model was developed from the payer perspective and included drug costs, administration costs, monitoring costs, palliative care costs and adverse-event related costs collected from Czech sources.

RESULTS

The base case incremental cost effectiveness ratio for KRd compared with Rd was €73,156 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Patients on KRd incurred costs of €117,534 over their lifetime compared with €53,165 for patients on Rd. The QALYs gained were 2.63 and 1.75 for patients on KRd and Rd, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining the strengths of randomised controlled trials and observational databases in cost-effectiveness models can generate policy-relevant results to allow well-informed decision-making. The current model showed that KRd is likely to be cost-effective versus Rd in the RW and, therefore, the reimbursement of KRd represents an efficient allocation of resources within the healthcare system.

Histiocytoses and neoplasms of the macrophage-dendritic cell lineages. Comparison of recent WHO classification published 2017 and classification of Histiocyte Society published 2016

The histiocytoses are rare disorders characterized by the accumulation of cells thought to be derived from dendritic cells or macrophages. Their clinical behaviour ranges from mild to disseminated and, sometimes, life-threatening forms. The incidence of this diseases is much smaller, then the incidence of diseases derived from lymphocytic or myeloid lineage. Langerhans cell histiocytosis is most frequent disease from this group. The last version of WHO classification from 2017 and last version of classification published by Histiocyte Society is summarised in this paper.

Bortezomib and Thalidomide Treatment Results in Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Patients are Comparable in Long-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Thalidomide-and bortezomib-containing regimens are widely used for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. The aim of this study was to analyse the efficiency of thalidomide-or bortezomib-based regimens in long-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2008 to 2012, 142 transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients were analysed retrospectively. Bortezomib was administered at the standard dosing of 1.3mg/m2 weekly, and thalidomide was administered at a daily dose of 100mg. Both drugs were combined with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. A total of 95 patients were treated with thalidomide and 47 with bortezomib. A median four cycles of treatment were administered in both groups.

RESULTS

In the thalidomide group, the overall response rate was 60.6%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.3 months (95% CI 7.4-13.2) and the median overall survival (OS) was 35.1 months (95% CI 23.9-46.3). In the bortezomib group, the overall response rate was 51.1%, the median PFS was 11.9 months (95% CI 8.8-15) and the median OS was 25.4 months (95% CI 9.3-41.6). There was a statistically significant difference in OS (p = 0.027), favouring the cyclophosphamide/thalidomide/dexamethasone group, but the response rates and PFS intervals were not significantly different between both groups. The median follow-up in the thalidomide group was 35.1 months (95% CI 0.2-95.9) compared to 25.1 months (95% CI 0.4-60.6) in the bortezomib group (p = 0.004). The incidence of serious adverse events was comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the results of bortezomib treatment are comparable to thalidomide treatment under conditions of short administration. According to other clinical trials, long-term bortezomib treatment provides an additional advantage for PFS and OS.

Bortezomib retreatment is effective in relapsed multiple myeloma patients - real-life clinical practice data

Nowadays, bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, is widely used in treatment of newly diagnosed or relapsed multiple myeloma. The aim of this study was to analyze efficiency of bortezomib retreatment in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. From 2004 to 2016, 283 patients were retrospectively evaluated at all hematological centers in the Czech Republic. Bortezomib was administered at the standard dosing and in combined therapy with corticosteroids, chemotherapy or thalidomide. Before bortezomib retreatment, 61% of patients received previous lenalidomide treatment, 40.6% autologous transplantation, and median number of prior lines of therapy was three. In total, 21% of patients were refractory to the first bortezomib treatment. In bortezomib retreatment, overall response rate was 34.5%, median progression-free survival was 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.7-8.9), median duration of response was 10.5 months (95% CI: 8.0-13.0) and median overall survival was 20.3 months (95% CI: 17.9-22.7). Grade 3-4 adverse events included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia and infection. Neuropathy grade 2 or higher occurred in 19.4% of patients. We conclude that bortezomib retreatment is an effective and safe therapeutic alternative for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients.

Liquid Biopsies - the Clinics and the Molecules

Unlike bone marrow biopsies, liquid biopsies represent a gentler, more accessible, less painful, repeatable and more comprehensive approach to get biologically relevant information about the entire tumor but also about treatment response and level of minimal residual disease. This is all possible since peripheral blood contains not only circulating tumor cells but also many circulating molecules of nucleic acids (microRNA, cell-free DNA, long non-coding RNA etc.). Multiple myeloma is a genetically heterogeneous disease characterized by multifocal tumor deposits in the bone marrow but also focal lesions elsewhere. Single-site biopsy of the bone marrow creates a sampling bias that provides a limited molecular profile as the biopsy cannot capture all subclones. Moreover, during disease progression and treatment, molecular profile is changed and subclones of multiple myeloma cells resistant to treatment are formed. Likewise, various clones found in extramedullary sites that are not present in the bone marrow respond differently to treatment directly influencing survival of patients. Thus, liquid biopsies seem to be a relevant and necessary next step for diseases such as multiple myeloma.Key words: multiple myeloma - minimal residual disease - prognosis - liquid biopsies - cell-free DNA - non-coding RNA.

Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Multiple Myeloma by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry

BACKGROUND

Progress in treatment of multiple myeloma extensively increased patient remission rates, so minimal residual disease (MRD) detection becomes essential to assess the effectivity of treatment and depth of complete response. Nowadays, multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) is the most used method for monitoring of MRD presence in the bone marrow of multiple myeloma patients; however, detection on molecular level can be used as well. It is evident that choice of protocol used for MFC-MRD assessment can significantly affect required results; nevertheless, standardized and highly sensitive approach of "next generation flow" is already available. Although benefit of MRD assessment as an independent predictor of progression-free survival and overall survival is known, very recent research showed that MRD-negative status surpasses the prognostic value of complete response achievement for progression-free survival and overall survival.

AIM

This review is focused on use MFC in MRD assessment in multiple myeloma. The technical aspects and clinical benefits of this approach are mentioned as well.

CONCLUSION

The information about MRD level detected by highly sensitive and reproducible MFC can be potentially used as a biomarker to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment strategies, help on treatment decisions and act as a surrogate for overall survival in multiple myeloma patients.Key words: multiple myeloma - minimal residual disease - flow cytometry - plasma cells.

Biomarkers in Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis - ALA) is a monoclonal gammopathy characterized by presence of aberrant plasma cells producing amyloidogenic immunoglobulin light chains. This leads to formation of amyloid fibrils in various organs and tissues, mainly in heart and kidney, and causes their dysfunction. As amyloid depositing in target organs is irreversible, there is a big effort to identify biomarker that could help to distinguish ALA from other monoclonal gammopathies in the early stages of disease, when amyloid deposits are not fatal yet. High throughput technologies bring new opportunities to modern cancer research as they enable to study disease within its complexity. Sophisticated methods such as next generation sequencing, gene expression profiling and circulating microRNA profiling are new approaches to study aberrant plasma cells from patients with light chain amyloidosis and related diseases. While generally known mutation in multiple myeloma patients (KRAS, NRAS, MYC, TP53) were not found in ALA, number of mutated genes is comparable. Transcriptome of ALA patients proves to be more similar to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients, moreover level of circulating microRNA, that are known to correlate with heart damage, is increased in ALA patients, where heart damage in ALA typical symptom.Key words: amyloidosis - plasma cell - genome - transcriptome - microRNA.