Randomized phase 2 trial on refinement of early-stage NSCLC adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed versus cisplatin and vinorelbine: the TREAT study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, balancing toxicity and efficacy mandates improvement.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with completely resected stages IB-pT3N1 NSCLC were randomly assigned to either four cycles cisplatin (C: 50 mg/m(2) day (d)1 + 8) and vinorelbine (V: 25 mg/m(2) d1, 8, 15, 22) q4 weeks or four cycles cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) d1) and pemetrexed (Px: 500 mg/m(2) d1) q3 weeks. Primary objective was the clinical feasibility rate (no grade (G)4 neutropenia/thrombocytopenia or thrombocytopenia with bleeding, no G3/4 febrile neutropenia or non-hematological toxicity; no premature withdrawal/death). Secondary objectives were drug delivery and efficacy.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty two patients were randomized (stages: 38% IB, 10% IIA, 47% IIB, 5% pT3pN1; histology: 43% squamous, 57% non-squamous). The feasibility rates were 95.5% (cisplatin and pemetrexed, CPx) and 75.4% (cisplatin and vinorelbine, CVb) (P = 0.001); hematological G3/4 toxic effects were 10% (CPx) and 74% (CVb) (P < 0.001), non-hematological toxic effects were comparable (33% and 31%, P = 0.798). Delivery of total mean doses was 90% of planned with CPx, but 66% (cisplatin) and 64% (vinorelbine) with CVb (P < 0.0001). The median number of cycles [treatment time (weeks)] was 4 for CPx (11.2) and 3 for CVb (9.9). Time to withdrawal from therapy differed significantly between arms favoring CPx (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy with CPx is safe and feasible with less toxicity and superior dose delivery compared with CVb.

Cetuximab combined with either gemcitabine (G) followed by docetaxel (D) or carboplatin/gemcitabine (CP/G) in chemotherapy-naive patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Safety profile from the ongoing phase II/III GemTax IV trial

8048

Background: The EGFR-targeting antibody cetuximab is undergoing broad clinical investigation in NSCLC. Our randomized trial assesses the safety of cetuximab combined with 2 different chemotherapy (CT) regimens in pts with advanced NSCLC. Phase II results are reported. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, WHO PS 0–2, and no prior CT received cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly either combined with G 1000 mg/m2 days 1 + 8 for 2 cycles (3qw) followed by D 75 mg/m2 day 1 for 2 cycles (q3w) (arm A) or CP AUC5 day 1 and G 1200 mg/m2 days 1 + 8 for 4 cycles (q3w) (arm B). Maintenance cetuximab was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: 229 pts evaluable for safety received 1810 infusions of cetuximab combined with CT and 1216 infusions of maintenance cetuximab. 35 pts in arm A received 1–26 cycles (median 4) of maintenance cetuximab and 6 pts received ≥10 cycles; 50 pts in arm B received 1–22 cycles (median 3) and 7 pts ≥10 cycles. Grade 1 or 2 skin reactions related to study medication occurred in 84% of pts in arm A and 77% in arm B. In general, toxicity was more common in pts receiving CP (leukopenia and neutropenia 10%; pneumonia and fever 10%). In arm B, thrombopenia developed in 14% of pts and allergic reactions in 8%. Toxicities requiring clinical intervention are shown below. Updated results will be presented for 320 pts. Conclusions: Cetuximab does not significantly increase CT toxicity in the induction phase and is well tolerated in the maintenance phase. Notably, ∼75% of pts developed skin rash (grade 3/4 in ∼5% of pts).

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

[Modern endoscopic procedures for diseases of the respiratory tract]

Bronchoscopy is the most important diagnostic procedure for the work-up of central bronchial processes and parenchymal lung diseases, such as lung cancer, pneumonias or diffuse lung diseases. Recent progress - ultrasound, navigation systems or ultrathin bronchoscopes - was made to achieve a better yield in the diagnosis of peripheral and peribronchial lesions. Bronchial recanalisation by thermal ablation or stenting is mainly performed with rigid instruments; these procedures as well as brachytherapy in local anaesthesia should be restricted to specialized centers. If pleuracentesis does not provide the etiology of pleural effusion, thoracoscopy in local anaesthesia is the method of choice. The procedure does not only provide a definite diagnosis for almost all of the patients, it also allows the immediate option for talcum poudrage in case of pleural malignancy.

Pemetrexed in second-line therapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

18198

Introduction: Based on the study of Vogelzang (2003) standard treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is pemetrexed cisplatin with a medium survival of 12 months compared to 9 months with cisplatin therapy. As this treatment prolongs survival, but is not a curative treatment, many patients will relapse during the course of their disease. In sensitive relapses (within more than 3 months) our policy was to reintroduce pemetrexed therapy in unselected consecutive patients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 17 consecutive patients treated in our hospital. Patient characteristics: 17 patients (pat), 14 males, 3 females, with MPM were included between April 2004 and November 2006 with an age between 45 and 82 years, with a median age of 65 years. Histologic subtypes were: 16 epithelial, 1 biphasic MPM. Pretreatment: 8 pat. had undergone palliative debulcing surgery (pleurectomy) 1 pat. underwent EPP. All patients were pretreated with platinum /pemetrexed, 5 pat. were pretreated with platinum/Gemcitabine before the availability of pemetrexed. 2nd line chemotherapy: 9 pat. were treated with carboplatin AUC5 / pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, 1 patient had cisplatinum 75 mg/m2/Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and 7 patients had pemetrexed single agent therapy (500 mg/m2 d1, WH d21), repeated on day 22 respectively. Results: Response: 6% (n=1) PR, MR: 12% (n=2 )., NC: 47% (n=8)., PD: 35% (n= 6), clinical benefit (PR, MR, NC) was seen in 65% of ou pat. Toxicity: Pemetrexed/Carboplatin or pemetrexed therapy were well tolerated, toxicity was mild: one patient developed mild sensory neurotoxicity (peripheral sensory neuropathy) (WHO II) under 6 cycles pemetrexed, 35% developed mild fatigue (Who I and II), one patient had mild renal impairment, no alopecia was seen. Survival: Only 3 patients had still died, median survival from start of second-line pemetrexed-therapy was not reached, time to progression was between 25 and 630 days, 4 pat. had not progressed until now. Conclusion: Second line therapy in MPM is not yet standard of care. Nevertheless patients with progressive disease following pemetrexed/platinum therapy may benefit from second line pemetrexed reintroduction therapy. Clinical benefit was seen in 65% with low toxicity.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Multimodale Therapie des kleinzelligen und nichtkleinzelligen Lungenkarzinoms

Lung cancer is divided into two types: non-small cell and small cell lung cancer. Small-cell lung cancer is a very aggressive rapid growing tumour type treated primarily with chemotherapy and, in the minority of patients with limited disease, with radiotherapy. Non-small cell lung cancer is treated in a multidisciplinary way with surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy depending on stage. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients. Adjuvant therapy has become state of the art in stage II and IIIA patients and must be considered in stage IB. Stage III patients should be treated in a multimodal way with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and, if possible, with surgery. Treatment for every stage III patient should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team. Stage IV patients in good performance status will benefit from a combination chemotherapy, preferably platinum-based. Second line therapy has become standard and targeted therapies are under evaluation and are common in second line chemotherapy.