Risk factors of metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis after potentially curative gastric cancer resection in the CRITICS trial

4053

Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is accountable for over 50% of metastatic spread in gastric cancer (GC). Little is known about factors contributing to the risk of metachronous PC as a single site of metastases after preoperative chemotherapy and potentially curative resection. An accurate prediction model of risk factors identifying high risk populations may pave the way for new treatment strategies, such as intraperitoneal chemotherapy. In this analysis, risk factors for the development of isolated metachronous PC after preoperative chemotherapy and surgical resection were investigated. Methods: In the CRITICS trial, 788 patients with resectable GC were randomized for preoperative chemotherapy and gastrectomy followed by either chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Patients who underwent a potentially curative resection without peritoneal metastases at time of surgery were included in this analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a competing risk model. Results: In total, 617 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 97 of 617 (16%) patients developed metachronous PC. The peritoneum was the first site of recurrence in 64 of 617 (10%) patients. Diffuse or mixed type GC, ypT4 stage and ypN3 stage or a lymph node ratio (LNR) with >20% tumor positivity were independent predictors of isolated PC in both univariate and multivariate analyses with hazard ratios (HR) of 2.90, 2.63 and 2.31, respectively (Table). ypT4 and ypN3 stage or a LNR >20% were also independent predictors of distant recurrence or death with HR of 1.46 and 2.34, respectively. Patients in whom all predictors were present had the highest 2 year cumulative incidences of both isolated PC development and other events of 39.6% and 48.8%, respectively. Conclusions: Diffuse or mixed tumor type, ypT4 and ypN3 or a LNR >20% were identified as independent risk factors for metachronous PC as a single site of metastases in a large cohort of patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgical resection. The combination of these factors might identify a subgroup that could benefit from preventive treatment strategies.[Table: see text]

Strategies for Motion Robust Proton Therapy With Pencil Beam Scanning for Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

Proton therapy of esophageal cancer is superior to photon radiation therapy in terms of normal tissue sparing. However, respiratory motion and anatomical changes may compromise target dose coverage owing to density changes, geometric misses, and interplay effects. Here we investigate the combined effect on clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and compare proton therapy with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study includes 26 patients with esophageal cancer previously treated with IMRT planned on 4-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT). For each patient, 7 proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) plans were created with different field configurations and optimization strategies. The effect of respiration was investigated by calculating the phase doses, 4D dose, and 4D dynamic dose (including interplay effects). The effect of anatomical changes was investigated by recalculating all plans on all phases of a 4D-CT surveillance scan.

RESULTS

The most robust PBS plans were achieved using 2 posterior beams requiring coverage of planning target volume (PTV) and simultaneously using robust optimization (RO) of CTV (2PA_PTVRO), resulting in only 1 patient showing V95%_CTV <97% in 1 or more phases of the planning CT. For the least robust PBS plans obtained using lateral + posterior beams and CTV-RO, but not requiring PTV coverage (2LP_RO), 10 patients showed underdosage. For IMRT, 2 patients showed underdosage. Interplay effects reduced V95%_CTV significantly when delivering only 1 fraction, but the effects generally averaged out after 10 fractions. The effect of interplay was significantly larger for RO-only plans compared with plans optimized with RO combined with PTV coverage. Combining the effect of anatomical changes and respiration on the 4D-CT surveillance scan resulted in V95%_CTV <97% for 3 2PA_PTVRO, 16 2LP_RO, and 8 IMRT patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PBS using posterior beam angles was more robust to anatomical changes and respiration than IMRT. The effect of respiration was enhanced when anatomical changes were present. Single fraction interplay effects deteriorated the dose distribution but were averaged out after 10 fractions.

Proposal for the delineation of neoadjuvant target volumes in oesophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To define instructions for delineation of target volumes in the neoadjuvant setting in oesophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiation oncologists of five European centres participated in the following consensus process: [1] revision of published (MEDLINE) and national/institutional delineation guidelines; [2] first delineation round of five cases (patient 1-5) according to national/institutional guidelines; [3] consensus meeting to discuss the results of step 1 and 2, followed by a target volume delineation proposal; [4] circulation of proposed instructions for target volume delineation and atlas for feedback; [5] second delineation round of five new cases (patient 6-10) to peer review and validate (two additional centres) the agreed delineation guidelines and atlas; [6] final consensus on the delineation guidelines depicted in an atlas. Target volumes of the delineation rounds were compared between centres by Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and maximum/mean undirected Hausdorff distances (H_max/H_mean).

RESULTS

In the first delineation round, the consistency between centres was moderate (CTVtotal: DSC = 0.59-0.88; H_mean = 0.2-0.4 cm). Delineations in the second round were much more consistent. Lowest variability was obtained between centres participating in the consensus meeting (CTVtotal: DSC: p < 0.050 between rounds for patients 6/7/8/10; H_mean: p < 0.050 for patients 7/8/10), compared to validation centres (CTVtotal: DSC: p < 0.050 between validation and consensus meeting centres for patients 6/7/8; H_mean: p < 0.050 for patients 7/10). A proposal for delineation of target volumes and an atlas were generated.

CONCLUSION

We proposed instructions for target volume delineation and an atlas for the neoadjuvant radiation treatment in oesophageal cancer. These will enable a more uniform delineation of patients in clinical practice and clinical trials.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is superior to chemoradiation after D2 surgery for gastric cancer in the per-protocol analysis of the randomized CRITICS trial

BACKGROUND

The Intergroup 0116 and the MAGIC trials changed clinical practice for resectable gastric cancer in the Western world. In these trials, overall survival improved with post-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and perioperative chemotherapy (CT). Intention-to-treat analysis in the CRITICS trial of post-operative CT or post-operative CRT did not show a survival difference. The current study reports on the per-protocol (PP) analysis of the CRITICS trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The CRITICS trial was a randomized, controlled trial in which 788 patients with stage Ib-Iva resectable gastric or esophagogastric adenocarcinoma were included. Before start of preoperative CT, patients from the Netherlands, Sweden and Denmark were randomly assigned to receive post-operative CT or CRT. For the current analysis, only patients who started their allocated post-operative treatment were included. Since it is uncertain that the two treatment arms are balanced in such PP analysis, adjusted proportional hazards regression analysis and inverse probability weighted analysis were used to minimize the risk of selection bias and to estimate and compare overall and event-free survival.

RESULTS

Of the 788 patients, 478 started post-operative treatment according to protocol, 233 (59%) patients in the CT group and 245 (62%) patients in the CRT group. Patient and tumor characteristics between the groups before start of the post-operative treatment were not different. After a median follow-up of 6.7 years since the start of post-operative treatment, the 5-year overall survival was 57.9% (95% confidence interval: 51.4% to 64.3%) in the CT group versus 45.5% (95% confidence interval: 39.2% to 51.8%) in the CRT group (adjusted hazard ratio CRT versus CT: 1.62 (1.24-2.12), P = 0.0004). Inverse probability weighted analysis resulted in similar hazard ratios.

CONCLUSION

After adjustment for all known confounding factors, the PP analysis of patients who started the allocated post-operative treatment in the CRITICS trial showed that the CT group had a significantly better 5-year overall survival than the CRT group (NCT00407186).

The impact of a tailored follow-up intervention on comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer - a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) can identify health problems in older persons. In addition, CGA includes intervention towards the identified problems. With follow up, more problems may be identified and the interventions can be adjusted. We wanted to compare CGA with or without tailored follow-up in a randomised design.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients 70+ years referred for oncology treatment with four primary tumour sites. Participants were randomised 1:1 to either control group with no follow-up or intervention group with a tailored follow-up by a multidisciplinary team. Primary outcome was adherence to cancer treatment. Secondary outcomes were daily life activities, physical performance and hospitalisation.

RESULTS

In total, 363 participants were randomised. After randomisation only 301 were planned to receive specific cancer treatment. Median age was 75 years. Among the 301 participants, 52% of control group vs. 61% of intervention group completed treatment. Risk Rate (RR): 1.16 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.95-1.42), p = .14. The impact varied between the included tumour-sites, p < .01. We found no difference in 90 days physical performance or daily life activities between groups. During the study period, 55% of controls vs. 47% in the intervention group were admitted to hospital, RR: 0.86 (95%CI: 0.69-1.07), p = .19.

CONCLUSION

In frail and vulnerable patients with cancer, a tailored follow-up on CGA showed no differences in ability to complete initially planned cancer treatment. The impact varied between the included tumour sites. We did not find any impact of tailored follow-up on daily life activities, physical performance or hospitalisation.

Venous thromboembolism during preoperative chemotherapy in the CRITICS gastric cancer trial

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of a venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with cancer. Gastric cancer has been associated with one of the highest risks for VTE. Chemotherapy, especially cisplatin has been associated with a high VTE risk. In this study, risk factors for VTE occurrence and their potential impact on subsequent therapeutic interventions were investigated in patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy, in the CRITICS gastric cancer trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable gastric cancer were preoperatively treated with three cycles of 3-weekly epirubicin, cisplatin or oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (ECC/EOC). VTE was defined as any thrombus in the venous system, excluding superficial and/or device related VTEs. Potential risk factors were analyzed in a multivariable regression model with age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), tumor localization, Lauren classification, type of chemotherapy (ECC/EOC), (cardiovascular) comorbidity, and previous VTE as independent risk factors. The impact of VTE on completion rate of preoperative chemotherapy, surgical resection rate, postoperative complications, and start of postoperative therapy were investigated.

RESULTS

Of 781 patients, 78 (10%) of 781 patients developed a VTE during preoperative chemotherapy. On multivariable analysis, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² and previous VTE were associated with VTE occurrence (reference BMI < 25 kg/m² ; OR 2.190; 95% CI 1.152-4.164; P = .017/previous VTE; OR 3.617; 95% CI 1.201-10.890; P = .022). Treatment with cisplatin was, compared to oxaliplatin, not significantly associated with VTE occurrence (OR 1.535; 95% CI 0.761-3.094; P = .231). VTE occurrence did not affect completion of preoperative chemotherapy, surgical resection rate, postoperative complications, or start of postoperative therapy.

CONCLUSION

High BMI and previous VTE were independent risk factors for VTE occurrence during preoperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable gastric cancer. VTE occurrence in the preoperative setting did not affect receipt of further treatment.

Delineation of whole heart and substructures in thoracic radiation therapy: National guidelines and contouring atlas by the Danish Multidisciplinary Cancer Groups

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study presents Danish consensus guidelines for delineation of the heart and cardiac substructures across relevant Danish Multidisciplinary Cancer Groups.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consensus guidelines for the heart and cardiac substructures were reached among 15 observers representing the radiotherapy (RT) committees of four Danish Multidisciplinary Cancer Groups. The guidelines were validated on CT scans of 12 patients, each with five independent contour sets. The Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the distance between the centers of the arteries and the mean surface distance were used to evaluate the inter-observer variation.

RESULTS

National guidelines for contouring the heart and cardiac substructures were achieved. The median DSC was 0.78-0.96 for the heart and the four cardiac chambers. For the four substructures of the left ventricle, the median DSC was 0.35-0.57. The coronary arteries were contoured in ten segments, with the best agreement for the left anterior descending coronary artery segments, with a median distance between the arteries ranging from 2.4-4.4 mm. The median variation was 3.7-12.8 mm for the right coronary artery segments and 3.7-6.2 mm for the left circumflex coronary artery segments, with the most pronounced inter-observer variation in the distal segment for all three coronary arteries.

CONCLUSION

National guidelines for contouring the heart and cardiac substructures were developed across relevant Danish Multidisciplinary Cancer Groups, where RT dose to the heart is of concern. The inter-observer contour overlap was best for the heart and chambers and decreased for smaller structures.

Older versus younger adults with gastric cancer receiving perioperative treatment: Results from the CRITICS trial

AIM

To evaluate treatment-related toxicity, treatment compliance, surgical complications and event-free survival (EFS) in older (≥70 years) versus younger (<70 years) adults who underwent perioperative treatment for gastric cancer.

METHODS

In the CRITICS trial, 788 patients with resectable gastric cancer were randomised before start of any treatment and received preoperative chemotherapy (3 cycles of epirubicin, cisplatin or oxaliplatin and capecitabine), followed by surgery, followed by either postoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (45Gy + cisplatin + capecitabine).

RESULTS

172 (22%) patients were older adults. During preoperative chemotherapy, 131 (77%) older adults versus 380 (62%) younger adults experienced severe toxicity (p < 0.001); older adults received significantly lower relative dose intensities (RDIs) for all chemotherapeutic drugs. Equal proportions of older versus younger adults underwent curative surgery: 137 (80%) versus 499 (81%), with comparable postoperative complications and postoperative mortality. Postoperative therapy after curative surgery started in 87 (64%) older adults versus 391 (78%) younger adults (p < 0.001). Incidence of severe toxicity during postoperative chemotherapy was 22 (54%) in older adults versus 113 (59%) in younger adults (p = 0.541); older adults received significantly lower RDIs for all chemotherapeutic drugs. Severe toxicity rates for postoperative chemoradiotherapy were 22 (48%) older adults versus 89 (45%) for younger adults (p = 0.703), with comparable chemotherapy RDIs and radiotherapy dose. Two-year EFS was 53% for older adults versus 51% for younger adults.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative treatment compliance, especially in the postoperative phase, was poorer in older adults compared with younger adults. As comparable proportions of patients underwent curative surgery, future studies should focus on neo-adjuvant treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00407186. EudraCT number: 2006-00413032.

Ramucirumab with cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic gastric or junctional adenocarcinoma (RAINFALL): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

VEGF and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2)-mediated signalling and angiogenesis can contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of gastric cancer. We aimed to assess whether the addition of ramucirumab, a VEGFR-2 antagonist monoclonal antibody, to first-line chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

For this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 126 centres in 20 countries, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic, HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with an interactive web response system to receive cisplatin (80 mg/m2, on the first day) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, twice daily for 14 days), every 21 days, and either ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. 5-Fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on days 1-5) was permitted in patients unable to take capecitabine. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed by intention to treat in the first 508 patients. We did a sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint, including a central review of CT scans. Overall survival was a key secondary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02314117.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 28, 2015, and Sept 16, 2016, 645 patients were randomly assigned to receive ramucirumab plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=326) or placebo plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=319). Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ramucirumab group than the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·753, 95% CI 0·607-0·935, p=0·0106; median progression-free survival 5·7 months [5·5-6·5] vs 5·4 months [4·5-5·7]). A sensitivity analysis based on central independent review of the radiological images did not corroborate the investigator-assessed difference in progression-free survival (HR 0·961, 95% CI 0·768-1·203, p=0·74). There was no difference in overall survival between groups (0·962, 0·801-1·156, p=0·6757; median overall survival 11·2 months [9·9-11·9] in the ramucirumab group vs 10·7 months [9·5-11·9] in the placebo group). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (85 [26%] of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 85 [27%] of 315 in the placebo group), anaemia (39 [12%] vs 44 [14%]), and hypertension (32 [10%] vs 5 [2%]). The incidence of any-grade serious adverse events was 160 (50%) of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group and 149 (47%) of 315 patients in the placebo group. The most common serious adverse events were vomiting (14 [4%] in the ramucirumab group vs 21 [7%] in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (11 [3%] vs 19 [6%]). There were seven deaths in each group, either during study treatment or within 30 days of discontinuing study treatment, which were the result of treatment-related adverse events. In the ramucirumab group, these adverse events were acute kidney injury, cardiac arrest, gastric haemorrhage, peritonitis, pneumothorax, septic shock, and sudden death (n=1 of each). In the placebo group, these adverse events were cerebrovascular accident (n=1), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (n=2), pulmonary embolism (n=2), sepsis (n=1), and small intestine perforation (n=1).

INTERPRETATION

Although the primary analysis for progression-free survival was statistically significant, this outcome was not confirmed in a sensitivity analysis of progression-free survival by central independent review, and did not improve overall survival. Therefore, the addition of ramucirumab to cisplatin plus fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is not recommended as first-line treatment for this patient population.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company.

A comparison of elderly versus nonelderly patients in the CRITICS gastric cancer trial

81

Background: Although the proportion of elderly cancer patients (pts) increases, few randomized trials provide separate results on this group. Here, we present a sub-analysis of the CRITICS trial, comparing elderly with non-elderly pts. Methods: Preoperative (preop) chemotherapy (CT) included three cycles of epirubicin, cisplatin/oxaliplatin and capecitabine (ECC/EOC); pts were upfront randomized between postoperative (postop) CT (3x ECC/EOC) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT; 45Gy + cisplatin/capecitabine). Elderly pts were defined as age ≥ 70 years at the time of randomization. We present tolerability and outcomes for elderly versus non-elderly pts. Results: Details on baseline characteristics, preop treatment, surgery, postop treatment and survival are shown in Table 1. Tumor type and localization did not differ between both groups. Conclusions: Age had a significant impact on toxicity and tolerability of preop CT, but did not affect surgical resection rates and complications. Although less elderly pts started postop treatment and elderly pts received lower dose in de CT arm, there were no differences in treatment related toxicities. Survival was not significantly different. Clinical trial information: NCT00407186. [Table: see text]

T-cell–inflamed gene expression profile (GEP) and PD-L1 expression in patients (pts) with esophageal cancer (EC)

26

Background: GEP and PD-L1 expression have been associated with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. In this retrospective observational study we explored the prognostic value of GEP and PD-L1 expression in pts with EC receiving standard-of-care therapy (SOC). Methods: Tumor tissue samples collected from 2005 to 2017 were procured from Yonsei Cancer Center (South Korea), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (USA) and Aarhus University Hospital (Denmark). GEP score was derived from an 18-gene signature using extracted tumor RNA analyzed by NanoString nCounter; GEP high/intermediate (GEP-H/I) and low were defined by a cutoff of –1.540, consistent with pembrolizumab clinical trials. PD-L1 expression was assessed by PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay (Agilent); positive was defined as combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10, where CPS is the the number of PD-L1–positive cells (tumor cells, lymphocytes and macrophages) divided by the total number of viable tumor cells, multiplied by 100. Associations of GEP score and PD-L1 expression with clinicopathologic variables were analyzed by chi-square test and multiple logistic regression models. Overall survival (OS) from diagnosis date to death date/last follow-up was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age, sex, stage, region and ECOG performance status (PS). Results: 294 samples with both PD-L1 and GEP data were analyzed. Median age was 65 y (range 33-88); 85% were from men, 58% were stage IV, 63% were esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and 37% were esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Overall 36% of tumors were GEP-H/I: 46% in EAC vs 18% in ESCC. GEP was not associated with OS overall (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] –0.90; 95% CI 0.68-1.18) or in pts with EAC (aHR 0.93; 95% CI 0.68-1.27) or ESCC (aHR 0.76; 95% CI 0.40-1.44). 21% of tumors were PD-L1-CPS ≥ 10: 18% in EAC and 26% in ESCC. PD-L1 expression was associated with ECOG PS (adjusted odds ratio 0.520; 95% CI 0.309-0.875; P = 0.014) but was not associated with OS overall (aHR 0.89; 95% CI 0.64-1.24) or in pts with EAC (aHR 0.97; 95% CI 0.63-1.49) or ESCC (aHR 1.31; 95% CI 0.73-2.34). Conclusions: Our results suggest that T-cell–inflamed GEP and PD-L1 expression may not be prognostic in pts with EC who received SOC.

Esophageal stenting for benign and malignant disease: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline

This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), endorsed by the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), the European Society of Digestive Endoscopy (ESDO), and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. Main recommendations for malignant disease 1 ESGE recommends placement of partially or fully covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) for palliative treatment of malignant dysphagia over laser therapy, photodynamic therapy, and esophageal bypass (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). 2 For patients with longer life expectancy, ESGE recommends brachytherapy as a valid alternative or in addition to stenting in esophageal cancer patients with malignant dysphagia. Brachytherapy may provide a survival advantage and possibly a better quality of life compared to SEMS placement alone. (Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.) 3 ESGE recommends esophageal SEMS placement as the preferred treatment for sealing malignant tracheoesophageal or bronchoesophageal fistula (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). 4 ESGE does not recommend the use of concurrent external radiotherapy and esophageal stent treatment. SEMS placement is also not recommended as a bridge to surgery or prior to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. It is associated with a high incidence of adverse events and alternative satisfactory options such as placement of a feeding tube are available. (Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.) Main recommendations for benign disease 1 ESGE recommends against the use of self-expandable stents (SEMSs) as first-line therapy for the management of benign esophageal strictures because of the potential for adverse events, the availability of alternative therapies, and costs (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). 2 ESGE suggests consideration of temporary placement of SEMSs as therapy for refractory benign esophageal strictures (weak recommendation, moderate evidence). Stents should usually be removed at a maximum of 3 months (strong recommendation, weak quality evidence). 3 ESGE suggests that fully covered SEMSs be preferred over partially covered SEMSs for the treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures, because of their lack of embedment and ease of removability (weak recommendation, low quality evidence). 4 For the removal of partially covered esophageal SEMSs that are embedded, ESGE recommends the stent-in-stent technique (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). 5 ESGE recommends that temporary stent placement can be considered for treating esophageal leaks, fistulas, and perforations. The optimal stenting duration remains unclear and should be individualized. (Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.) 6 ESGE recommends placement of a SEMS for the treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding refractory to medical, endoscopic, and/or radiological therapy, or as initial therapy for patients with massive esophageal variceal bleeding (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence).