Infants' perception of kinetic depth and stereokinetic displays

Studies examined infants' perceptions of 3-dimensional form, using a kinetic depth effect (KDE) display and displays containing subsets of the motion present in the KDE display. One subset consisted of "between-contour" motion, and the second consisted of "within-contour" motion. Research with adults has suggested that only between-contour motion leads to a compelling depth percept. In Experiments 1 and 2, infants generalized habituation from a KDE display to the between-contour but not the within-contour changes. In Experiments 3 and 4, infants generalized habituation from a KDE display to the between-contour display viewed from a novel orientation but not to the within-contour display viewed from the original orientation. Results indicate sensitivity to between-contour but not within-contour information, suggesting that infants perceive the 3-dimensional form of these displays.

Auditory perception of fractal contours

A series of experiments examined auditory contour formation, investigating listeners' sensitivities to a family of random fractals known as fractional Brownian noises. Experiments 1A and 1B looked at identification of contours when 3 different noises were portrayed using variations in the pitch, duration, or loudness of successive notes of a sequence. Listeners could categorize pitch and loudness encodings, but not duration mappings. Experiment 2 looked at the effect of simultaneous presentation of pitch and loudness information, finding that these dimensions combined additively to increase identification of the noise distributions. Experiment 3 looked at discrimination of pitch contours as a function of changing fractal dimension. Discrimination curves approximated an inverted U shape, a finding that is not understandable in terms of sensitivity to differences in fractal dimension per se, nor in terms of "tuned" perceptual sensitivity to statistical regularities of the environment.

The perception of natural contour

The observation that natural curves and surfaces are often fractal suggests that people may be sensitive to their statistical properties. The perceptual protocols that underlie discrimination between fractals and between other types of random contour and fractals are examined. Discrimination algorithms that have precisely the same sensitivities as human observers are constructed. These algorithms do not recognize the integrated scale hierarchy intrinsic to fractal form and operate by imposing a metatheory of structure that is based on a signal-noise distinction. The success of the algorithms implies that (a) self-affinity in random fractals is not perceptually recovered and (b) people have a natural disposition to view contour in terms of signal and noise. The authors propose that this disposition be understood as a principle of perceptual organization.

Auditory perception of fractal contours

A series of experiments examined auditory contour formation, investigating listeners' sensitivities to a family of random fractals known as fractional Brownian noises. Experiments 1A and 1B looked at identification of contours when 3 different noises were portrayed using variations in the pitch, duration, or loudness of successive notes of a sequence. Listeners could categorize pitch and loudness encodings, but not duration mappings. Experiment 2 looked at the effect of simultaneous presentation of pitch and loudness information, finding that these dimensions combined additively to increase identification of the noise distributions. Experiment 3 looked at discrimination of pitch contours as a function of changing fractal dimension. Discrimination curves approximated an inverted U shape, a finding that is not understandable in terms of sensitivity to differences in fractal dimension per se, nor in terms of "tuned" perceptual sensitivity to statistical regularities of the environment.

Detection of the traversability of surfaces by crawling and walking infants

In four studies we investigated the perception of the affordance for traversal of a supporting surface. The surface presented was either rigid or deformable, and this property was specified either optically, haptically, or both. In Experiment 1A, crawling and walking infants were presented with two surfaces in succession: a standard surface that both looked and felt rigid and a deforming surface that both looked and felt nonrigid. Latency to initiate locomotion, duration of visual and haptic exploration, and displacement activity were coded from videotapes. Compared with the standard, the deforming surface elicited longer latency, more exploratory behavior, and more displacement in walkers, but not in crawlers, suggesting that typical mode of locomotion influences perceived traversability. These findings were replicated in Experiment 1B, in which the infant was presented with a dual walkway, forcing a choice between the two surfaces. Experiments 2, 3A and B, and 4A and B investigated the use of optical and haptic information in detecting traversability of rigid and nonrigid surfaces. Patterns of exploration varied with the information presented and differed for crawlers and walkers in the case of a deformable surface, as an affordance theory would predict.

Use of central and peripheral optical flow in stance and locomotion in young walkers

Young walkers (up to 5 years of age) were presented with optical flow in a moving room. Flow was global or was restricted to either the center or the periphery of the visible optic array. On standing trials the response rate was greatest when peripheral flow was available. The availability of central flow had a smaller effect on standing, and the younger children showed greater response rates to frontal flow than did the older ones. There was a strong negative correlation between age and response rate for all conditions. Flow also affected stability during locomotion. Response rate was again related to the location of the available flow. It is concluded that children show the same relative sensitivity for flow in the periphery of the dynamic structure of the optic array as has been observed in adults, but that this differentiation of different areas of optical structure is not yet fully developed when children learn to stand.