Evolution of a Novel Robotic Training Curriculum in a Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship

BACKGROUND

Robotic surgery is increasingly being used for complex oncologic operations, although currently there is no standardized curriculum in place for surgical oncologists. We describe the evolution of a proficiency-based robotic training program implemented for surgical oncology fellows, and demonstrate the outcomes of the program.

METHODS

A 5-step robotic curriculum began integration in July 2013. Fellows from July 2013 to August 2017 were included. An education portfolio was created for each fellow, including pre-fellowship experience, fellowship experience with data from robotic curriculum and operative experience, and post-fellowship practice information.

RESULTS

Of 30 fellows, 20% completed a prior fellowship, 97% trained at an academic residency, 57% had prior robotic training (median 5 h), and 43% had performed robotic surgery (median 0 cases). In fellowship, on average, fellows spent 5 h on the virtual reality curriculum and performed 19 biotissue anastomoses. For total surgeries, fellows operating from the console increased over time (p = 0.005). For pancreas, the average percentage of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) steps completed increased (p < 0.011), as did the number of PDs in which the fellow completed the entire resection (p = 0.013). Fellows were 10 times more likely to complete the entire distal than PD from the console (p < 0.01). Post-fellowship, 83% of fellows obtained an academic position, 88% utilized robotics, and 91% performed pancreatic surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

With dedicated training, fellows can safely primarily perform complex gastrointestinal robotic surgeries and, after graduation, take jobs incorporating this skill set. In this era of scrutiny on cost and outcomes, specialized training programs offer a safe integration option for complex technical skills.

Prehospital Plasma during Air Medical Transport in Trauma Patients at Risk for Hemorrhagic Shock

BACKGROUND

After a person has been injured, prehospital administration of plasma in addition to the initiation of standard resuscitation procedures in the prehospital environment may reduce the risk of downstream complications from hemorrhage and shock. Data from large clinical trials are lacking to show either the efficacy or the risks associated with plasma transfusion in the prehospital setting.

METHODS

To determine the efficacy and safety of prehospital administration of thawed plasma in injured patients who are at risk for hemorrhagic shock, we conducted a pragmatic, multicenter, cluster-randomized, phase 3 superiority trial that compared the administration of thawed plasma with standard-care resuscitation during air medical transport. The primary outcome was mortality at 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 501 patients were evaluated: 230 patients received plasma (plasma group) and 271 received standard-care resuscitation (standard-care group). Mortality at 30 days was significantly lower in the plasma group than in the standard-care group (23.2% vs. 33.0%; difference, -9.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -18.6 to -1.0%; P=0.03). A similar treatment effect was observed across nine prespecified subgroups (heterogeneity chi-square test, 12.21; P=0.79). Kaplan-Meier curves showed an early separation of the two treatment groups that began 3 hours after randomization and persisted until 30 days after randomization (log-rank chi-square test, 5.70; P=0.02). The median prothrombin-time ratio was lower in the plasma group than in the standard-care group (1.2 [interquartile range, 1.1 to 1.4] vs. 1.3 [interquartile range, 1.1 to 1.6], P<0.001) after the patients' arrival at the trauma center. No significant differences between the two groups were noted with respect to multiorgan failure, acute lung injury-acute respiratory distress syndrome, nosocomial infections, or allergic or transfusion-related reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

In injured patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock, the prehospital administration of thawed plasma was safe and resulted in lower 30-day mortality and a lower median prothrombin-time ratio than standard-care resuscitation. (Funded by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command; PAMPer ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01818427 .).

Health Disparities Impact Expected Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Nationally

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

National adherence to treatment guidelines for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a concern. This study aims to evaluate national expected treatment (ET) adherence for all PDAC stages. We hypothesized that both patient and hospital demographics are associated with national ET disparities for PDAC.

METHODS

Clinical stage I through IV PDAC patients were evaluated using the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2013. ET was defined as surgery for stage I/II, chemotherapy or radiation for stage III, and chemotherapy for stage IV. Unexpected treatment (UT) was defined as no surgery for stage I/II, surgery for stage III, and radiation or surgery for stage IV. No treatment is denoted by NT.

RESULTS

171,351 patients were identified, of whom 56,589 (33.0%) were stage I/II, 23,459 (13.7%) were stage III, and 91,303 (53.3%) were stage IV. Of patients, 48.4% received ET, 14.7% received UT, and 36.9% received NT. ET rates were 41.1% for stage I/II, 65.4% for stage III, and 48.5% for stage IV patients. On multivariable analysis, older age, non-White race, lower socioeconomic status, being uninsured or Medicaid, increased comorbidities, nonacademic centers, and low-volume hospitals were independent negative predictors of receiving ET (P < 0.01). On subgroup analysis, high-volume academic centers had similar negative predictors of ET despite higher ET adherence overall (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and hospital factors impact ET of PDAC on a national level. These treatment disparities for PDAC are concerning, even at high-volume academic centers. Future studies need to identify the causes of treatment disparities for PDAC with intervention measures aimed to relieve treatment disparities.

Folfirinox versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for neoadjuvant treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A propensity matched analysis

402

Background: Comparative effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G-nP) in the neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), remains unknown. The aim of this study was to perform a propensity matched analysis of neoadjuvant FOLFRINOX vs G-nP for resectable(R) and borderline resectable (BR) PDA. Methods: A single institution retrospective review of all R and BR PDA patients who underwent resection after NAT with FOLFIRINOX or G-nP was performed. Comparative effectiveness analysis was conducted using inverse-probability-weighted estimators. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from the time of diagnosis. Results: A total of 193 patients (FOLFIRINOX=73, G-nP=120) who underwent resection from 01/11-03/17 were included. Median OS was 28.9 months (95% CI 26.1-39.7). Patients treated with FOLFIRINOX were younger (median age 63 vs. 69 y), had less comorbidities (median CCI 4 vs. 5), more frequent BR disease (79 vs. 59%), and larger tumors (median CT size 2.9 v 2.7 cm) compared to G-nP (all p < 0.05). Duration of NAT was similar and both regimens were equally effective in achieving a 50% or 80% decline in CA19-9 (logistic regression, P 0.9). Rates of R0 resection were also similar (80%), but folfirnox was associated with a reduction in pN1 disease (56% vs. 72%, p =0.028). Receipt of adjuvant therapy was similar in both groups (74 vs. 75%, p =0.79). In a multivariable cox regression analysis utilizing only preoperative variables (FOLFIRINOX v G-nP, age, gender, CT tumor size, BR vs. R, pre NAT CA19-9 and number of NAT cycles), only the number of neoadjuvant cycles was an independent predictor of survival (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34-0.71, p < 0.001). In a propensity matched analysis of 166 patients using the same preoperative variables, the average treatment effect of FOLFIRINOX was to increase OS by 4.9 months above G-nP (p=0.012). Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX and Gem Abraxane are viable options for neoadjuvant treatment of PDA. In this study, FOLFIRINOX was associated with a 4.9 month improvement in OS when compared to G-nP in the neoadjuvant setting after adjusting for covariates.

Safety and feasibility of the robotic platform in the management of surgical sequelae of chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND/AIM

The application of minimally invasive surgery to chronic pancreatitis (CP) procedures is uncommon. Our objective was to report the safety and feasibility of the robotic approach in the treatment of surgical sequelae of CP, and provide insights into the technique, tricks, and pitfalls associated with the application of robotics to this challenging disease entity.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing robotic-assisted resections and/or drainage procedures for CP at the University of Pittsburgh between May 2009 and January 2017 was performed. A video of a robotic Frey procedure is also shown.

RESULTS

Of 812 robotic pancreatic resections and reconstructions 39 were for CP indications. These included 11 total pancreatectomies [with and without auto islet transplantation], 8 Puestow procedures, 4 Frey procedures, 6 pancreaticoduodenectomies, and 10 distal pancreatectomies. Median age was 49, and 41% of the patients were female. The most common etiology for CP was idiopathic pancreatitis (n = 16, 46%). Median operative time was 324 min with a median estimated blood loss of 250 ml. None of the patients required conversion to laparotomy. A Clavien III-IV complication rate was experienced by 5 (13%) patients, including one reoperation. Excluding the eleven patients who underwent TP, rate of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula was 7% (Grade B = 2, Grade C = 0). No 30 or 90 day mortalities were recorded. The median length of hospital stay was 7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the robotic platform is safe and feasible when tackling complex pancreatic resections for sequelae of chronic pancreatitis.

A margin distance analysis of the impact of adjuvant chemoradiation on survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA) remains controversial. Recent data suggest that increased margin clearance (MC: distance between tumor and cut surface) is associated with improved survival after PD, but the role of adjuvant CRT in patients with known MC is undefined. We sought to delineate the impact of adjuvant CRT on survival based on MC following PD.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PD for PDA between 2002 and 2014 were retrospectively stratified into three groups based on MC: 0 mm, ≤1 mm, and >1 mm. The impact of CRT on survival in each MC group was determined by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Three hundred and ten patients with known MC were analyzed (0 mm =67, ≤1 mm =113, and >1 mm =130). Increasing MC was independently associated with improved OS (≤1 mm, HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.96, P=0.03; >1 mm, HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.75, P=0.001; compared to 0 mm). Adjuvant CRT was administered to 62 patients (20%). On margin-stratified multivariate analysis, adjuvant CRT was independently associated with increased OS in patients with ≤1 mm margins (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.18-0.69, P=0.002) but not for 0 mm and >1 mm margins.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that the benefit of adjuvant CRT may be restricted to patients with ≤1 mm MC after PD for pancreatic cancer.

Robotic approach mitigates perioperative morbidity in obese patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy

INTRODUCTION

The aim was to evaluate the impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD).

METHODS

A retrospective review of all pancreaticoduodenectomies from 9/2011 to 4/2015 was performed. Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m².

RESULTS

Of 474 pancreaticoduodenectomies performed: RPD = 213 (45%) and OPD = 261 (55%). A total of 145 (31%) patients were obese (70 RPD, 75 OPD). Obese patients had increased EBL (p = 0.03), pancreatic fistula (B&C; p = 0.077), and wound infection (p = 0.068) compared to the non-obese. For obese patients, RPD had decreased OR time (p = 0.0003), EBL (p < 0.001), and wound infection (p = 0.001) with no difference in Clavien ≥3 complications, margins, LOS or 30-day mortality compared with OPD. In multivariate analysis, obesity was the strongest predictor of Clavien ≥3 (OR 1.6; p = 0.041) and wound infection if BMI > 35 (OR 2.6; p = 0.03). The robotic approach was protective of Clavien ≥3 (OR 0.6; p = 0.03) on univariate analysis and wound infection (OR 0.3; p < 0.001) and grade B/C pancreatic fistula (OR 0.34; p < 0.001) on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Obese patients are at risk for increased postoperative complications regardless of approach. However, the robotic approach mitigates some of the increased complication rate, while preserving other perioperative outcomes.

Analysis of Predictors of Resection and Survival in Locally Advanced Stage III Pancreatic Cancer: Does the Nature of Chemotherapy Regimen Influence Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC) historically portends a poor prognosis. FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel have proven effective in the metastatic setting. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of these regimens compared with older regimens in LAPC.

METHODS

A retrospective, single institutional review of all consecutive LAPC treated with "new" (FOLFIRINOX and/or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel) and "old" (gemcitabine or 5-FU) chemotherapy from 2010 to 2014 was performed. Univariate and multivariate predictors of resection and survival were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients (new chemotherapy = 61, old chemotherapy = 31) were analyzed, of which 19 (21%) underwent eventual resection (median overall survival [OS] = 32 vs. 14.3 months for unresected patients, P = 0.0002). For the overall cohort, resection (hazard ratio [HR] 0.261, P = 0.014), radiation therapy (HR 0.458, P = 0.004), number of lines of chemotherapy (HR 0.486, P = 0.012), and new chemotherapy (HR 0.593 vs. old regimens, P = 0.065) were independent predictors of OS on multivariate analyses (MVA). On MVA, predictors of eventual resection were head and neck tumors (OR 0.307, P = 0.033) or SMA involvement (OR 0.285, P = 0.023). In nonresected patients (73), MVA showed treatment with new chemotherapy (HR 0.452, P = 0.006), radiation (HR 0.459, P = 0.006), and number of lines of CT (HR 0.705, P = 0.013) to be predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In LAPC, use of FOLFIRNOX and/or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel is associated with improved survival compared with older chemotherapy regimens, regardless of eventual resection. Tumor location and relationship to certain vasculature are important determinants of resection in this cohort.

Primary Tumor Resection Following Favorable Response to Systemic Chemotherapy in Stage IV Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Synchronous Metastases: a Bi-institutional Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma have traditionally been offered palliative chemotherapy alone, and the role of surgery in these patients remains unknown.

METHODS

A bi-institutional retrospective review was performed for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent resection of the primary tumor from 2008 to 2013. The primary outcome measured was postoperative overall survival. Secondary outcomes included postoperative disease-free survival and overall survival from the time of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were identified who met the study criteria with a median follow-up of 30 months. Metastatic sites included the liver (n = 16), the lung (n = 6), and the peritoneum (n = 2). Chemotherapy included FOLFIRINOX (n = 14) and gemcitabine-based regimens (n = 9), with a median of 9 cycles (range 2-31) prior to surgical treatment. Median time from diagnosis to surgery was 9.7 months (IQR 5.8-12.8). Median overall survival (OS) from surgery, disease-free survival, and OS from diagnosis were 18.2 months (95 % CI 11.8-35.5), 8.6 months (95 % CI 5.2-16.8), and 34.1 months (95 % CI 22.5-46.2), respectively. The 1- and 3-year OS from surgery were 72.7 % (95 % CI 49.1-86.7) and 21.5 % (95 % CI 4.3-47.2), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Resection of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma may be considered in highly selected patients with favorable imaging and CA 19-9 response following chemotherapy at high-volume centers providing multidisciplinary care. These patients should be enrolled in prospective clinical trials or institutional registries to better quantify the potential benefits of such a strategy.

A policy of omitting an intensive care unit stay after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and cost-effective

BACKGROUND

Immediate postoperative admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still a standard practice at many institutions. Our aim was to examine whether omission of an immediate postoperative ICU admission would be safe and result in improved outcomes and cost after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD).

METHODS

In December 2014, a non-ICU admission policy was implemented for patients undergoing RPD. Before this date, all RPDs were routinely admitted to the ICU on post operative day = 0. Using a prospective database, outcomes of the patients in the no-ICU cohort were compared with those of the patients routinely admitted to the ICU before implementation of this policy.

RESULTS

The ICU (n = 49) and no-ICU cohorts (n = 47) were comparable in age, gender, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, receipt of neoadjuvant therapy, operative time, estimated blood loss, tumor size, and pathologic diagnosis (all P values = NS). Clavien complications, pancreatic leak, reoperation, readmission, and mortality were similar between both the groups (all P values = NS). Hospital length of stay (LOS) was shorter for the no-ICU group (median 6.8 versus 7.7 d, P = 0.01). This reduced LOS and omission of routine postoperative ICU admission translated into a cost reduction from $23,933 (interquartile range $19,833-$28,991) in the ICU group to $19,516 (interquartile range $17,046-$23,893) in the no-ICU group, P = 0.004. The reduction in LOS and cost remained significant after adjusting for all related demographics and perioperative characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

A standard policy of omitting a postoperative ICU admission on post operative day 0 after RPD is safe and can result in reduced LOS and overall savings in total hospital cost.

FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel efficacy in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

399

Background: Locally advanced (LA) unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA) historically portends a poor prognosis with a median OS of 9-11 months. Recently, two multi-drug regimens – FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel – have proven effective in the metastatic setting. We hypothesized that use of these regimens in the LA setting may improve survival. Methods: A retrospective review of a single institution’s cancer registry of all consecutive LA (unresectable) PDA patients between 2010 and 2014 was performed. LA status was verified by review of the triphasic, pancreas protocol CT scan at diagnosis using the 2015 NCCN criteria for resectability. Patients were divided into 4 groups: Group 1 = no therapy, Group 2 = “old” gemcitabine or 5-FU-based chemotherapy (CTX), Group 3 = “new” CTX (FOLFIRINOX and/or Gem/nab-paclitaxel), and Group 4 = resection after downstaging. Demographic, tumor related variables, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Results: LA disease was verified in 107 consecutive patients. Median age was 69 years (range 36-92) and 50.5% were male. Median follow-up was 13.2 months (range 0.6-60.4). Median OS for Groups 1 (n=15), 2 (n=24), 3 (n=49), 4 (n=19) was 1.4, 11, 17.3, and 32 months respectively (p<0.001). On Cox multivariate regression (adjusted for age, sex, anatomic variables, and CA19-9 level at diagnosis), radiation (HR 0.44, p=0.003), older CTX (HR 0.16, p=0.007), newer CTX (HR 0.10, p=0.001), use of 2 or more lines of CTX (HR 0.16, p=0.022), CA19-9 decrease by >50% with any line of therapy (HR 0.31, p<0.001), and surgery (HR 0.28, p=0.002) were all significant predictors of OS in this cohort. On multivariate analysis between groups 2 and 3, newer CTX compared to older CTX (HR 0.490, p=0.02) and radiation (HR 0.510, p=0.015) provided an OS benefit. Conclusions: Compared to older CTX regimens, FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel improve survival in verified LA PDA patients. For the subset that ultimately undergoes resection, survival outcomes rival those of historically published resectable cohorts.

Effect of adjuvant (AD) radiotherapy (RT) on outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA): A margin-stratified analysis

311

Background: The role of RT following PD for PDA remains controversial due to ambiguity in the definition of R0/R1 margin status in existing clinical trials. Recent data suggest that increased margin clearance (MC) is associated with improved survival after PD for PDA, however the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (ADRT) in patients with known MC is undefined. We sought to analyze the influence of ADRT on outcomes of PD for PDA based on MC data. Methods: We retrospectively identified 326 patients with MC data (in mm) who underwent PD between 2002-2014. Recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated by Cox multivariate regression analysis on significant variables. Results: Mean age was 68 yrs and 55% were male. Median follow-up was 21 mos (IQR 12-34 mos). ADRT was administered to 87 patients (27%). Median RFS and OS for the entire cohort was 14 mos and 25 mos. On univariate analysis, ADRT was not associated with improved median RFS (13 vs. 14 mos; p = NS) or OS (23 vs. 27 mos; p = NS), but increasing MC was associated with prolonged median RFS [10 (0mm) vs. 13 (0-1mm) vs. 23 mos ( > 1mm); p < 0.02 for all pairs] and OS [16 (0mm) vs. 23 (0-1mm) vs. 40 mos ( > 1mm); p < 0.01 for all pairs]. After controlling for sex, BMI, neoadjuvant therapy, LVI, PNI, lymph node ratio > 0.2, tumor size > 2.5cm, and adjuvant chemotherapy, increasing MC was independently associated with improved OS [HR 0.680; p = 0.034 (0-1mm); HR 0.451; p < 0.001 ( > 1mm), compared to 0mm]. Patients were subsequently stratified into 3 groups based on MC [0mm (n = 73); 0-1mm (n = 118); > 1mm (n = 135)]. ADRT was administered less frequently to patients with greater MC [0mm (n = 29; 41%); 0-1mm (n = 36; 31%); > 1mm (n = 22; 16%); p < 0.001]. Even when stratified by MC, ADRT was not associated with improved RFS [10 vs. 9 mos (0mm); 13 vs. 12 mos (0-1mm); 21 vs. 23 mos ( > 1mm); p = NS for all pairs] or OS [16 vs. 18 mos (0mm); 24 vs. 23 mos (0-1mm); 33 vs. 42 mos ( > 1mm); p = NS for all pairs]. Conclusions: ADRT is not associated with improved RFS or OS following PD for PDA regardless of MC. The use of RT following PD for PDA should be re-examined.

The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre

BACKGROUND

Robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) is performed increasingly, but knowledge of the number of cases required to attain procedural proficiency is lacking. The aim of this study was to identify the learning curve associated with RDP at a high-volume pancreatic centre.

METHODS

Metrics of perioperative safety and efficiency for all consecutive RDPs were evaluated. Outcomes were followed to 90 days. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to identify inflexion points corresponding to the learning curve.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2013, 100 patients underwent RDP. There was no 90-day mortality. In two patients (2.0%), surgery was converted to laparotomy. Thirty procedures were performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Precipitous operative time reductions from an initial operative time of 331 min were observed after the first 20 and 40 cases to 266 min and 210 min, respectively (P < 0.0001). The likelihood of readmission was significantly lower after the first 40 cases (P = 0.04), and non-significant reductions were observed in incidences of major (Clavien-Dindo Grade II or higher) morbidity and Grade B and C leaks, and length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

In this experience, RDP outcomes were optimized after 40 cases. Familiarity with the platform and dedicated training are likely to contribute to significantly shorter learning curves in future adopters.

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the presence of aberrant or anomalous hepatic arterial anatomy: safety and oncologic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Hepatic arterial anomalies (HAAs) are not infrequently encountered during pancreatic resections. In view of the current emergence of the robotic platform as a safe alternative to open surgery in experienced centres, this study sought to determine the implications of HAAs on the safety and oncologic outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD).

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database of patients with HAAs who underwent RPD (RPD + HAA) at a single institution between 2008 and 2013 was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information and perioperative outcomes of RPD were compared for patients with and without HAAs.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients underwent RPD; 112 (78.9%) did not have and 30 (21.1%) did have HAAs. The majority (90.0%) of RPDs in patients with HAAs were performed for malignant indications and all aberrant vessels were preserved without conversion to laparotomy. There were no statistically significant differences between RPD patients with and without HAAs with respect to preoperative demographics, tumour characteristics, operative metrics (operative time, estimated blood loss, conversion) and postoperative outcomes, including complications, length of stay and readmissions. Negative margin (R0) rates were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and feasible in patients with HAAs and has outcomes similar to those in patients with normal arterial anatomy.

Serum CA 19-9 response to neoadjuvant therapy is associated with outcome in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Baseline carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is a useful prognostic marker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA); however, data on the significance of a change in CA 19-9 following neoadjuvant therapy are lacking.

METHODS

All patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for PDA from July 2010 to February 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Resection rate, R0 resection rate, need for venous resection, and overall survival were correlated to CA 19-9 response. Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and multivariate analysis using Cox regression were used.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were studied (21 patients with resectable disease, 40 borderline resectable, and 17 with locally advanced disease). A variety of chemotherapies ± radiation were utilized during the study period. Overall, 56 patients (72 %) had a decrease in CA 19-9 of >50 % with neoadjuvant treatment. In borderline resectable patients, CA 19-9 response of >50 % predicted R0 resection (odds ratio 4.2; p = 0.05). In borderline resectable patients who had an increase in CA 19-9, none of five (0 %) underwent R0 resection compared with 80 % of the remaining cohort (p = 0.001). The complete pathologic response rate was 29 % in patients who had a CA 19-9 response of >90 % versus 0 % in the remaining patients (p < 0.001). A CA 19-9 response of >50 % resulted in improved overall survival (28.0 vs. 11.1 months; p < 0.0001) and was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio 0.26; 95 % CI 0.13-0.55; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

CA 19-9 response to neoadjuvant therapy is associated with R0 resection rate, histopathologic response, and survival. Incorporation of this easily obtainable biomarker into future clinical trials may facilitate more rapid evaluation of novel regimens.

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: prognostic factors and oncologic outcome analysis

BACKGROUND

Most patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) present with late-stage, unresectable disease that responds poorly to systemic chemotherapy while, at the same time, effective targeted therapies are lacking. We assessed the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) in MPM.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 65 patients with MPM undergoing CRS/HIPEC between 2001 and 2010. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox-regression models identified prognostic factors affecting oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Adequate CRS was achieved in 56 patients (CC-0 = 35; CC-1 = 21), and median simplified peritoneal cancer index (SPCI) was 12. Pathologic assessment revealed predominantly epithelioid histology (81 %) and biphasic histology (8 %), while lymph node involvement was uncommon (8 %). Major postoperative morbidity (grade III/IV) occurred in 23 patients (35 %), and 60-day mortality rate was 6 %. With median follow-up of 37 months, median overall survival was 46.2 months, with 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival probability of 77, 57, and 39 %, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 13.9 months, with 1-, 2-, and 5-year disease failure probability of 47, 68, and 83 %, respectively. In a multivariate Cox-regression model, age at surgery, SPCI >15, incomplete cytoreduction (CC-2/3), aggressive histology (epithelioid, biphasic), and postoperative sepsis were joint significant predictors of poor survival (chi square = 42.8; p = 0.00001), while age at surgery, SPCI >15, incomplete cytoreduction (CC-2/3), and aggressive histology (epithelioid, biphasic) were joint significant predictors of disease progression (Chi square = 30.6; p = 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor histology, disease burden, and the ability to achieve adequate surgical cytoreduction are essential prognostic factors in MPM patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) reduces postoperative morbidity, hospital stay, and recovery as compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Technical limitations of laparoscopic surgery may limit patient eligibility and require conversion to open or hand-assisted surgery to maintain patient safety. We hypothesized that robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RADP) was superior to LDP as a result of improved surgical manipulation and visualization, potentially expanding the indications for minimally invasive pancreatectomy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between January 2004 and February 2011. We compared the perioperative outcomes, 90-day morbidity and mortality of our first 30 RADPs to 94 consecutive historical control LDPs.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing RADP and LDP demonstrated equivalent age, sex, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists' score, and tumor size. Postoperative length of hospital stay and rates of pancreatic fistula, blood transfusion, and readmission were not statistically different. Patients in the RADP group did not require conversion to open surgery unlike the LDP group (16%, P < 0.05) and had reduced risk of excessive blood loss. There were more pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas approached robotically (43%) than laparoscopically (15%) (P < 0.05). Oncological outcomes in these cases were superior for the robotic-assisted group with higher rates of margin negative resection and improved lymph node yield for both benign and malignant lesions (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

RADPs were equivalent to LDPs in nearly all measures of outcome and safety but significantly reduced the risk of conversion to open resection, despite a statistically greater probability of malignancy in the robotic cohort. We concluded that robotic assistance may broaden indications for minimally invasive pancreatectomy.

Models of lower extremity damage in mice: time course of organ damage and immune response

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic inflammatory changes have been identified as major causes of altered organ function and failure. Both hemorrhage and soft tissue damage induce these inflammatory changes. Exposure to heterologous bone in animal models has recently been shown to mimic this inflammatory response in a stable and reproducible fashion. This follow-up study tests the hypothesis that inflammatory responses are comparable between a novel trauma model ("pseudofracture", PFx) and a bilateral femur fracture (BFF) model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In C57BL/6 mice, markers for remote organ dysfunction and inflammatory responses were compared in four groups (control/sham/BFF/PFx) at the time points 2, 4, and 6 h.

RESULTS

Hepatocellular damage in BFF and PFx was highly comparable in extent and evolution, as shown by similar levels of NFkappaB activation and plasma ALT. Pulmonary inflammatory responses were also comparably elevated in both trauma models as early as 2 h after trauma as measured by myeloperoxidase activity (MPO). Muscle damage was provoked in both BFF and PFx mice over the time course, although BFF induced significantly higher AST and CK levels. IL-6 levels were also similar with early and sustained increases over time in both trauma models.

CONCLUSIONS

Both BFF and PFx create similar reproducible inflammatory and remote organ responses. PFx will be a useful model to study longer term inflammatory effects that cannot be studied using BFF.