Complementary and alternative medicine and musculoskeletal pain in the first year of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment in early breast cancer patients

Background

Patients with breast cancer (BC) show strong interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), particularly for adverse effects of adjuvant endocrine treatment — e.g., with letrozole. Letrozole often induces myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia, with potential noncompliance and treatment termination. This analysis investigated whether CAM before aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy is associated with pain development and the intensity of AI-induced musculoskeletal syndrome (AIMSS) during the first year of treatment.

Patients and methods

The multicenter phase IV PreFace study evaluated letrozole therapy in postmenopausal, hormone receptor–positive patients with early BC. Patients were asked about CAM use before, 6 months after, and 12 months after treatment started. They recorded pain every month for 1 year in a diary including questions about pain and numeric pain rating scales. Data were analyzed for patients who provided pain information for all time points.

Results

Of 1396 patients included, 901 (64.5%) had used CAM before AI treatment. Throughout the observation period, patients with CAM before AI treatment had higher pain values, for both myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia, than non-users. Pain increased significantly in both groups over time, with the largest increase during the first 6 months. No significant difference of pain increase was noted regarding CAM use.

Conclusions

CAM use does not prevent or improve the development of AIMSS. Pain intensity was generally greater in the CAM group. Therefore, because of the risk of non-compliance and treatment discontinuation due to the development of higher pain levels, special attention must be paid to patient education and aftercare in these patients.

•

Pain levels of myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia increase under letrozole intake.

•

Within one year pain levels increase in both, CAM users as well as non-CAM users.

•

In CAM users pain levels were higher at all time points than in non-CAM users.

•

The greatest increase of pain levels was noted in the first six treatment months.

•

CAM does not prevent or improve the development of myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia.

[TILGen study-immunological targets in patients with breast cancer : Influence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes]

BACKGROUND

The interaction of our immune system with breast cancer (BC) cells prompted the investigation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and targeted, tumor antigen-specific immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

Correlation between TILs and pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NACT). Tumor-specific antigens (TSAs) in HER2+ and triple negative BC and establishment of TSA-specific therapies within the interdisciplinary TILGen study.

METHODS

Illustration of the TILGen study design. Assessment of TILs and correlation with pCR within this BC study.

RESULTS

pCR was achieved in 38.4% (56/146) and associated with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negative (ER-/PR-) and HER2+ tumors. Lymphocytic predominant BC (LPBC) was found in 16.4% (24/146), particularly in ER-/PR- (ER-: 27.3% vs. ER+: 9.9%, PR-: 22.3% vs. PR+: 8.2%), large, and poorly differentiated BC. TILs were significantly correlated with pCR in multivariate analysis. In LPBC, pCR was achieved in 66.7%, whereas it was 32.8% in non-LPBC.

CONCLUSIONS

First results confirm the influence of the human immune system on the response to NACT in HER2+ and triple negative BC. TSA-specific immunotherapy might improve the outcome in BC patients but there is an urgent need for comprehensive studies to further investigate this issue.

AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2019

Every year the Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (German Gynecological Oncology Group, AGO), a group of gynecological oncologists specialized in breast cancer and interdisciplinary members specialized in pathology, radiologic diagnostics, medical oncology, and radiation oncology, prepares and updates evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with early and metastatic breast cancer. Every update is performed according to a documented rule-fixed algorithm, by thoroughly reviewing and scoring the recent publications for their scientific validity and clinical relevance. This current publication presents the 2019 update on the recommendations for metastatic breast cancer.

Surrogate threshold effect based on a meta-analysis for the predictive value of progression-free survival for overall survival in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Clinical trials investigating therapies for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) generally use progression-free survival (PFS) as primary endpoint, which is not accepted as patient-relevant outcome within the German benefit assessment. Hence a validation of PFS as surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) is needed, e.g., in the indication of HR+, HER2-negative mBC.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted. RCT were included if at least one study arm investigated fulvestrant, letrozole, tamoxifen, exemestane, or anastrozole. Additionally, hazard ratios reported for OS/PFS including confidence interval or standard error were mandatory. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to estimate the relation of surrogate endpoint PFS and patient-relevant outcome OS as well as the surrogate threshold effect (STE) which is used to determine thresholds for the estimate of the surrogate endpoint.

RESULTS

16 studies with 5324 patients in total were included in the analyses. The correlation between hazard ratios of PFS and OS was statistically significant (r = 0.72, 95% CI 0.35-0.90) representing a positive linear relationship. STE analysis was applied. The meta-regression model revealed a STE for HR_PFS of 0.60 and sensitivity analyses underlined robustness of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the derived STE, it is possible to draw conclusions on a significant effect in OS for a hypothetical trial demonstrating an upper confidence limit of HR_PFS < 0.60 in PFS. However, only final OS results are able to confirm if a clinical relevant difference in survival time can be achieved.

Abstract OT1-11-02: PRAEGNANT - Real world evidence, translational research, big and smart data: A prospective academic translational research network for the optimization of the oncological health care quality in the adjuvant and advanced/ metastatic setting (NCT02338167)

Background

During the last decades the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients has improved due to a variety of new treatment strategies. Nevertheless, many ABC patients are faced with limited prognosis, and their treatment remains a challenge. New targeted therapies complement the well-established treatment options for ABC (CDK4/6 inhibition, anti-endocrine, chemotherapy, antibody based and bone related therapies), leading to improved treatment regimens tailored to the needs of special patient sub-populations.

SPECIFIC AIMS/TRIAL DESIGN

The PRAEGNANT network study is conducted as an academic, prospective registry and diagnostic translational study, accompanied by biomaterial collection. The pilot phase in more than 60 centers aims at including 3500 ABC patients. The primary objective is to discover biomarkers, which predict progression free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include overall survival (OS), breast cancer specific survival, objective response rate, patient reported outcomes (PRO), description of therapies used in the metastatic setting, therapy adherence, health economics for patients with ABC, incidence of (serious) adverse events and big data/ machine learning algorithms. The exploratory objectives comprise correlations of gene alterations and their influence on OS, PFS, side effects and PRO. Exploratory biomarkers are assessed at baseline and at every change of therapy. These biomarkers include gene expression profiling of the primary tumor and corresponding metastasis, somatic mutations (measured in the tumor and in circulating tumor DNA), germline genetic variations, epigenetic changes and miRNA variations. Furthermore, plasma and serum markers are assessed. If actionable molecular alterations are detected patients are informed and recruited into suitable studies if available.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:

Any adult patient (&gt;18 years) with the diagnosis of ABC and who is willing and able to sign the informed consent can be enrolled.

STATISTICAL METHODS/TARGET ACCRUAL:

The PRAEGNANT study as a prospective real world registry and diagnostic translational study aims to identify biomarkers in ABC patients, which may predict PFS. Target accrual for the pilot phase is 3500 patients. Each patient will be documented for up to 36 months with an estimated median PFS for all patients of 11 months across all treatment lines.

Citation Format: Müller V, Huober J, Volz B, Overkamp F, Kolberg H-C, Hadji P, Haeberle L, Ettl J, Hartkopf AD, Lux MP, Lüftner DI, Wallwiener M, Taran F-A, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Geberth M, Lermann J, Abenhardt A, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Janni W, Fehm TN, Brucker SY, Wallwiener D, Schneeweiss A, Fasching PA, Tesch H. PRAEGNANT - Real world evidence, translational research, big and smart data: A prospective academic translational research network for the optimization of the oncological health care quality in the adjuvant and advanced/ metastatic setting (NCT02338167) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-11-02.

Abstract P6-17-37: Therapy landscape of patients with metastatic, HER2 positive breast cancer - Data from the real world breast cancer registry PRAEGNANT (NCT02338167)

Purpose:

This analysis describes comprehensive real-world data concerning the use of anti-HER2 therapies in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Specifically, it describes the therapy patterns of treatments with trastuzumab (TZM), pertuzumab+trastuzumab (PTZ/TZM), lapatinib (LAP) and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1).

Methods:

The PRAEGNANT study is a real-time, real-world registry for patients with MBC. Patients can be registered for PRAEGNANT at any time during the course of their metastatic disease and are followed up until death. All therapy lines are documented. This analysis presents the utilization of anti-HER2 therapies as well as therapy sequences.

Results:

Of 1936 patients within PRAEGNANT at the time of database closure 451 were HER2 positive (23.3%). Within the analysis set (417 patients after an unilateral breast cancer diagnosis), of which 53% were included in PRAEGNANT in the 1stline setting, 241 were treated with TZM (58%), 237 with PTZ (57%), 85 with LAP (20%) and 125 with T-DM1 (30%) during the course of their therapies. The sequence PTZ/TZMàT-DM1 was given to 51 patients (12%). Worse ECOG, negative hormone receptor status, and visceral or brain metastases were associated with a more frequent use of this therapy sequence. Most patients received T-DM1 after a therapy with pertuzumab.

Conclusions:

Both novel therapies (PTZ/TZM and T-DM1) are utilized in a high proportion of HER2 positive breast cancer patients. As most patients receive T-DM1 after pertuzumab real world data might help to understand whether this sequence has similar efficacy like in the approval study.

Citation Format: Lux MP, Hartkopf AD, Huober J, Volz B, Taran F-A, Overkamp F, Hadji P, Tesch H, Haeberle L, Ettl J, Lueftner DI, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Geberth M, Lermann J, Abenhardt W, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Fasching PA, Janni W, Fehm TN, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A, Kolberg H-C. Therapy landscape of patients with metastatic, HER2 positive breast cancer - Data from the real world breast cancer registry PRAEGNANT (NCT02338167) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-17-37.

Abstract P6-17-22: Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) after previous treatment with pertuzumab in patients with advanced breast cancer (NCT02338167)

Background

Studies leading to the approval of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) have been conducted without pertuzumab as previous therapy. Therefore data about patient characteristics and the efficacy of T-DM1 after a treatment with pertuzumab is scarce. Aim of this study was to analyze a real world patient cohort of advanced breast cancer (aBC) patients, who were treated with T-DM1 after a treatment containing pertuzumab in the metastatic setting with regard to patient characteristics and progression free survival (PFS).

Methods

The PRAEGNANT metastatic breast cancer registry (NCT02338167) is a prospective registry for metastatic breast cancer patients with focus on molecular biomarkers. Patients of all therapy lines with any kind of treatment are eligible for this registry. Collected data comprises all relevant patient and tumor characteristics, therapies, adverse events, quality of life, patient reported outcomes, response and survival (PFS/OS). Here we report on the patient characteristics and PFS data for HER2 positive patients treated with T-DM1 after a treatment with pertuzumab. Patients had to be included before or at the beginning of the T-DM1 therapy.

Results

A total of 58 patients could be identified, who were suitable for the analysis. Of those 34 were treated in the second line, 14 in the third line and 10 in the fourth line or higher. Most of the pertuzumab therapies before T-DM1 were conducted in first line (n=46; 79.3%). Median PFS for all patients was 4.8 months (95% CI: 3.0-7.8 months). Median PFS for patients treated in the 3rdline and 4thline or higher was 4.2 months(95%CI: 2.3 - NA) and 4.0 months (95%CI: 1.8-N.A.), respectively. In patients treated 2ndline with T-DM1 PFS was 7.7 months (95%CI: 2.8 – 12.2).

Conclusion

T-DM1 is effective as 2ndand further line therapy following pretreatment with pertuzumab. Overall PFS was about 5 months with 7.7 months as 2nd-line therapy. The PFS in higher therapy lines might be shorter. As the sample size of this real world cohort was rather low and analyses have to be considered exploratory, this data need to be confirmed in studies with a larger sample size.

Citation Format: Schneeweiss A, Lux MP, Hartkopf AD, Volz B, Kolberg H-C, Hadji P, Tesch H, Haeberle L, Ettl J, Lüftner DI, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Geberth M, Lermann J, Abenhardt W, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Overkamp F, Huober J, Taran F-A, Janni W, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Fasching PA, Fehm TN. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) after previous treatment with pertuzumab in patients with advanced breast cancer (NCT02338167) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-17-22.

Abstract P2-09-04: Identification of a neoantigen targeted by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a patient with Her2+ breast cancer

Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that the number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) positively correlates with outcome and response to chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). Furthermore, first studies of immune-checkpoint inhibitors showed promising results in those patients. However, the targets of those TILs remain unknown. Neoantigens, which arise in the process of tumorigenesis, appear as potential targets. They can elicit high avidity, tumor-specific T-cell responses. Thus, it is the aim of our study to ascertainif these TILs are directed against tumor-specific mutations.

Methods: TILs from breast cancer biopsies taken at the time point of diagnosis were expanded by unspecific stimulation. Additionally, we used the Gentle Macs Dissociator in combination with flow cytometry to investigate the number of TILs in the tumor tissue. Furthermore, we performed whole-genome sequencing of tumor tissue and as reference autologous blood cells to determine tumor-specific mutations. Mutations leading to a non-synonymous amino acid change were analyzed for RNA expression of the encoding gene as well as to determine potential neoantigens. Neoantigens were evaluated for their potential binding to the patient's specific HLA molecules. Peptides for potential neoantigens were synthesized, loaded onto autologous antigen presenting cells (APCs) and cocultured with TILs. All IFNγ producing T-cells were clonally expanded and retested for peptide specificity to identify neoantigen specific T-cell clones.

Results: Our flow cytometric analysis of the tumor biopsy for more than 300 patients showed higher frequencies of TILs in TNBC as compared to other types of breast cancer or patients without malignancy. Screening for neoantigen specific T-cells in one patient led to identification of three peptide-specific CD4+ T-cell clones isolated from HER2+ breast cancer tissue taken at the time point of diagnosis. All T-cell clones specifically recognized the same tumor-specific mutation and not the wildtype counterpart. Furthermore, we demonstrated that these T-cell clones also recognized the endogenously expressed mutated antigen. This verified the ability of processing and presentation of the respective protein. Interestingly, we could also isolate a T-cell clone recognizing the same neoantigen in the resected tumor tissue after neoadjuvant therapy. Based on CDR3 sequencing we could prove that the four T-cell clones represented individual clones. This confirms the polyclonal nature of the immune response. Moreover, we showed that the same neoepitope was presented in two different HLA restriction molecules of the patient with three of the clones recognizing it in HLA-DPB1*0401 and one in HLA-DPB1*0201. These results further underline the immunogenicity of this neoantigen.

Conclusion: In conclusion, our data demonstrate tumor-specificity of TILs in a patient with HER2+ breast cancer. Furthermore, we show the feasibility to identify individual cancer specific T-cell targets in breast cancer patients. These results may contribute to the development of targeted patient-specific immunotherapies in the future.

Citation Format: Reimann H, Nguyen A, Hübner H, Erber R, Bausenwein J, Van der Meijden ED, Lux MP, Jud S, Griffioen M, Rauh C, Sanborn JZ, Benz SC, Rabizadeh S, Beckmann MW, Mackensen A, Rübner M, Fasching PA, Kremer AN. Identification of a neoantigen targeted by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a patient with Her2+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-04.

Design and Implementation of a Single Source Multipurpose Hospital-Wide Clinical Trial Registry

IT-supported patient recruitment, serious adverse event reporting as well as making information about clinical trials accessible to the public on websites, are still major challenges in clinical trials. Too often the distribution of information about trials being performed within a hospital across numerous institutions and IT systems is a barrier to provide efficient IT support for such scenarios. Thus, the essential prerequisite to mastering those challenges is to achieve one single point of truth with adequate, complete, accurate and up-to-date information about all clinical trials running at a hospital. We describe the design and implementation of such a single source clinical trial registry serving multiple purposes at a university hospital.

Abstract P3-11-07: Factors associated with first line chemotherapy use in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer – data from the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry

Background

For breast cancer patients with metastases which are not life threatening national and international guidelines recommend the exhaustion of all antihormonal therapeutic options before recommending chemotherapy. In Germany up to now only everolimus was an additional option to overcome endocrine resistance. CDK4/6 inhibitors recently became available in Germany (Nov 2011). Aim of this analysis was the identification of predictors for a decision against an antihormonal treatment.

Methods

The PRAEGNANT metastatic breast cancer registry (NCT02338167) is a prospective registry for metastatic breast cancer patients. Besides biomarker research the description of real-world treatment data was one of the main study aims. This analysis was restricted to first line metastatic patients who were hormone receptor (HR) positive and HER2 negative. First, predictors were identified with a multiple logistic regression model. Then patients, who received chemo or not ,were compared with regard to overall survival using Cox regression analysis with the predictors for chemotherapy from above and additionally chemo status (yes/no)

Results

A total of 389 HR-positive and HER2-negative patients with detailed treatment information were included during the 1st line therapy into PRAEGNANT. Of those 173 (44.5%) received a chemotherapy, 190 an antihormone therapy (AHT) (48.8%), and 26 (6.7%) everolimus+AHT. In the multiple logistic regression model, older patients, lower graded tumors, bone only disease and previous adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with a lower rate of first line chemotherapies. BMI and number of concomitant diseases had no influence on the choice of first line metastatic therapy. In patients with visceral metastases 58.1% were treated with a 1st line chemo, while in patients with brain metastases or bone only metastases these numbers were 55.6% and 26.9%. Grading had an influence with patients having a G1, G2 and G3 tumor receiving 1st line chemo in 28.0%, 38.4% and 63.2% of the cases respectively. Patients who received chemo seemed to have a worse overall survival than patients who did not receive chemo (adjusted HR 1.58; 95% CI, 0.89 to 2.18). However, this result was not signifcant (p = 0.12). Overall survival was primarily influenced by ECOG and location of metastasis

Conclusion

The usage of chemotherapy can be predicted with age, metastasis pattern, grading and previous use of chemotherapy. However, we could not show that patients benefited from chemotherapy. On contrary, there was a tendency that patients treated with chemotherapy had poorer overall survival. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm this claim.

Citation Format: Huober J, Fasching PA, Taran F-A, Volz B, Overkamp F, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Haeberle L, Ettl J, Hartkopf AD, Lux MP, Lueftner D, Wallwiener M, Mueller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Geberth M, Fersis N, Abenhardt W, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Janni W, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A, Fehm TN. Factors associated with first line chemotherapy use in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer – data from the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-07.

Abstract P1-07-20: Developing prognostic indicators of poor outcomes in PRAEGNANT metastatic breast cancer cohort

Background: Despite novel, targeted therapies, metastatic breast cancer patients have an extremely unfavourable prognosis. Prognostic and predictive factors for patients with advanced breast cancer are not well understood. Molecular assessment of the patient and the tumor in the metastatic situation is not routinely performed despite advances in molecular precision medicine indicating great benefit to this patient group. Here we present early findings from the first 142 patients of a prospective molecular breast cancer registry with completed transcriptomic profiling.

Methods: The PRAEGNANT study proctocol (NCT02338767) is a molecular registry designed to provide an infrastructure for the real-time comprehensive analysis of tumor and patient molecular characteristics under study conditions. Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumors have been used from this registry to identify molecular, transcriptomic predictors for overall survival (OS).

Known clinical correlates for OS (e.g. hormone-receptor status, age at diagnosis, and BMI) were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard ratios, and compared to transcriptomic markers of outcomes. Transcriptomes for all patient tumors were sequenced on the Illumina sequencing platform, and analyzed by RSEM to estimate transcripts per million (TPM) values for each gene isoform. Log-TPM values were used in established (PAM50) and novel (hierarchical clustering) expression-based subtyping of tumor samples. Expression-based subtypes were demonstrated to be strong prognostic indicators by Cox analysis. A Lasso regression machine learning algorithm was used to develop an expression-based predictive model of OS.

Results: Hormone receptor positivity (HR=0.7, p&lt;0.006) and TNBC status (HR=1.4, p&lt;0.01) were significantly associated with outcomes. PAM50 subtypes were also strong indicators of outcomes (e.g. Basal disease compared to Luminal-A subtype has HR=1.4, p&lt;0.017). A novel expression-based high-risk cluster in this cohort was more indicative of poor prognosis than clinical variates or Basal-type, with a HR=2.7 (p&lt;0.009) when compared to Luminal-A subtype. An expression-based survival prediction model achieved a concordance-index of 0.65 in an unseen validation cohort. Patients predicted as having the shortest survival times were in the high-risk cluster.

Conclusions: Here we demonstrate using molecular profiling to develop prognostic signatures that out-perform standard clinical correlates of poor outcomes, even in a small subset of the total cohort. As the PRAEGNANT cohort expands these prognostic tools will continue to improve and supplement physician knowledge to improve patient outcomes.

Citation Format: Szeto C, Benz S, Nguyen A, Rübner M, Wallwiener D, Tesch H, Hadji P, Fehm TN, Janni W, Overkamp F, Lueftner D, Lux MP, Wallwiener M, Beckmann MW, Huebner H, Ettl J, Hartkopf AD, Mueller V, Taran FA, Belleville E, Schneeweiss A, Soon-Shiong P, Rabizadeh S, Fasching PA. Developing prognostic indicators of poor outcomes in PRAEGNANT metastatic breast cancer cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-20.

Abstract P5-21-09: Overall survival of metastatic breast cancer patients – data from the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry

Background

Breast Cancer registries can help to understand how patient groups are treated outside clinical trials and what outcome is to expected for specific patient groups and therapy lines, which are not included into clinical trials. Here we present overall survival data according to therapy lines, patient and tumor characteristics.

Methods

The PRAEGNANT metastatic breast cancer registry (NCT02338167) is a prospective registry for breast cancer patients with focus on molecular biomarkers. Patients of all therapy lines with any kind of treatment are eligible for this registry. Collected data comprises therapies, adverse events, quality of life and other patient reported outcomes. Here we report on the comparison of overall survival data for different patient groups. For that analysis was restricted to patients included in the first therapy line for subgroup comparisons. Only for the analysis of the effect of therapy line on overall survival the complete dataset was used.

Results

A total of 1854 patients took part in this analysis. Of those 1016 were included first line, and 340, 213 and 285 patients 2nd line, 3rd lin4 and 4th line or higher respectively. A total of 339 deaths were observed. Two year survival rates (2Y-OS) for these groups were 75%, 65%, 57% and 36% (p(log-rank)&lt;0.001). All further analyses were done only for the subset of first line treated patients with a total of 127 events. HER2 positive patients had the highest 2Y-OS rate of 84% and TNBC had the worst with 60% (see figure 1). Absolute numbers of deaths for TNBC, luminal A like, luminal B like and HER2 posives were 21, 48, 25, and 21. According to metastastic pattern the following survival rates were seen: brain (48%), other locations (69%), visceral (78%) and bone only (81%). ECOG was another factor that had a large influence on OS with ECOG 0: 83%, ECOG 1: 67% and EGOG 2+: 63% 2Y-OS. Age, BMI, number of concomitant diseases, and primary metastatic status did not have an influence on 2Y-OS.

Conclusion

This breast registry included patients over all therapy lines however mainly during the 1st line of therapy. Simple patient and tumor characteristics can classify patients into patients with differently favourable prognosis. Patients with HER2 positive disease had the best overall survival, while TNBC and luminal B like patients had the worst prognosis. As most of the patients were luminal A like 43% of all deaths occured within the group of luminal A like patients, which will need further focus for therapy development in the future.

Citation Format: Taran F-A, Fasching PA, Volz B, Huober J, Overkamp F, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Haeberle L, Ettl J, Lux MP, Hartkopf AD, Lueftner D, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Geberth M, Fersis N, Abenhardt W, Kurbacher C, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Janni W, Fehm TN, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A. Overall survival of metastatic breast cancer patients – data from the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-09.

Abstract P6-11-10: Impact of disease progression on health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic breast cancer in the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry

Background: Improved progression-free survival is considered as treatment goal for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) since it is assumed to delay or prevent deterioration of quality of life.Aim of our analysis was to examine the influence of disease progression on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Methods: The PRAEGNANT study comprises a real-life registry for patients with MBC. HRQoL was assessed with the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Version 3.0 questionnaire at study entry and every 3 months thereafter. The primary endpoint was minimally important deterioration (MID) in global HRQoL score by ≥ five points between baseline and any follow-up assessment. A logistic regression model was built with MID (yes/no) at a follow-up timepoint as outcome variable and several covariates as predictors.

Results: In total, 329 patients were included in this analysis, with disease progression in 63 patients. Concerning the primary study aim, progression status predicted MID of global HRQoL status in addition to the other covariates. The adjusted odds ratio for the effect of progression status on MID was 2.22 (95% CI: 1.04 – 4.73). Comparisons of mean differences of QoL domains/scales yielded no differences.

Conclusions: We provide evidence that disease progression in patients with metastatic breast cancer in a real-world registry has a significant negative impact on HRQoL as measured by MID of HRQoL. This study emphasizes the relevance of avoiding progression and prolonging PFS to maintain QoL.

Citation Format: Wallwiener M, Nabieva N, Haeberle L, Taran FA, Hartkopf AD, Volz B, Overkamp F, Brandl AL, Kolberg H-C, Hadji P, Tesch H, Ettl J, Lux MP, Lueftner D, Belleville E, Fasching PA, Janni W, Beckmann MW, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Fehm T, Brucker SY, Wallwiener D, Schneeweiss A, Mueller V. Impact of disease progression on health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic breast cancer in the PRAEGNANT breast cancer registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-10.

Budget impact analysis of gene expression tests to aid therapy decisions for breast cancer patients in Germany

OBJECTIVES

Many women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer may not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Gene expression tests can reduce chemotherapy over- and undertreatment by providing prognostic information on the likelihood of recurrence and, with Oncotype DX, predictive information on chemotherapy benefit. These tests are currently not reimbursed by German healthcare payers. An analysis was conducted to evaluate the budget impact of gene expression tests in Germany.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Costs of gene expression tests and medical and non-medical costs associated with treatment were assessed from healthcare payer and societal perspectives. Costs were estimated from data collected at a university hospital and were combined with decision impact data for Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, Prosigna and EndoPredict (EPclin). Changes in chemotherapy use and budget impact were evaluated over 1 year for 20,000 women.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy was associated with substantial annual costs of EUR 19,003 and EUR 84,412 per therapy from the healthcare payer and societal perspective, respectively. Compared with standard care, only Oncotype DX was associated with cost savings to healthcare payers and society (EUR 5.9 million and EUR 253 million, respectively). Scenario analysis showed that both women at high clinical but low genomic risk and low clinical but high genomic risk were important contributors to costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncotype DX was the only gene expression test that was estimated to reduce costs versus standard care in Germany. The reimbursement of Oncotype DX testing in standard clinical practice in Germany should be considered.

Genetic Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Prognosis in the Prospectively Randomized SUCCESS A Study

Large-scale genotyping studies have identified over 70 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with breast cancer (BC) risk. However, knowledge regarding genetic risk factors associated with the prognosis is limited. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the prognostic effect of nine known breast cancer risk SNPs. BC patients (n = 1687) randomly sampled in an adjuvant, randomized phase III trial (SUCCESS A study) were genotyped for nine BC risk SNPs: rs17468277 (CASP8) , rs2981582 (FGFR2) , rs13281615(8q24), rs3817198 (LSP1) , rs889312 (MAP3K1) , rs3803662 (TOX3) , rs13387042(2q35), rs4973768 (SLC4A7) , rs6504950 (COX11) . Cox proportional hazards models were used to test the SNPs' association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Additional analyses were carried out for molecular subgroups. rs3817198 in LSP1 (lymphocyte-specific protein 1) was the only SNP that significantly influenced OS (p = 0.01) and PFS (p < 0.01) in the likelihood ratio test comparing the genetic survival model with the clinical survival model. In the molecular subgroups, triple-negative patients with two minor alleles in rs3817198 had a much better prognosis relative to OS (adjusted HR 0.03; 95% CI 0.002 - 0.279) and PFS (HR 0.09; 95% CI 0.02 - 0.36) than patients with the common alleles. The same effect on PFS was shown for patients with luminal A tumors (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05 - 0.84), whereas patients with luminal B tumors had a poorer PFS with two minor alleles (HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.02 - 4.40). The variant in rs3817198 has a prognostic effect particularly in the subgroup of patients with triple-negative BC, suggesting a possible link with immunomodulation and BC.

A phase III, open label, randomized multicenter controlled trial of oral versus intravenous treosulfan in heavily pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer: a study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO)

OBJECTIVE

In recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), there is a high demand on effective therapies with a mild toxicity profile. Treosulfan is an alkylating agent approved as oral (p.o.) and intravenous (i.v.) formulation for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Data on safety and efficacy for either formulation are rare. For the first time we conducted a randomized phase III study comparing both formulations in women with ROC.

METHODS

Patients having received at least two previous lines of chemotherapy were randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms: treosulfan i.v. 7000 mg/m² d1 q4w or treosulfan p.o. 600 mg/m² d1-28 q8w. Primary endpoint was safety regarding hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity grade III/IV, secondary endpoints were other toxicities, clinical benefit rate (CBR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and quality of life.

RESULTS

250 patients were treated with treosulfan i.v. (128) or treosulfan p.o. (122). In general treosulfan therapy was well tolerated in both treatment arms. Leukopenia grade III/IV occurred significantly more frequently in the p.o. arm (3.9% i.v. arm, 14.8% p.o. arm, p = 0.002). Other toxicities were similar in both arms. CBR was comparable between arms (41.4% i.v. arm, 36.9% p.o. arm). No difference in TTP (3.7 months i.v. arm, 3.5 months p.o. arm) or OS (13.6 months i.v. arm, 10.4 months p.o. arm, p = 0.087) occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the safety and efficacy results treosulfan is an acceptable option for heavily pretreated OC patients. Regarding the toxicity profile the i.v. application was better tolerated with less grade III and IV toxicities.