The adult lifespan of the female honey bee (Apis mellifera): Metabolic rate, AGE pigment and the effect of dietary fatty acids

Female honey bees can be queens or workers and although genetically identical, workers have an adult lifespan of weeks while queens can live for years. The mechanisms underlying this extraordinary difference remain unknown. This study examines three potential explanations of the queen-worker lifespan difference. Metabolic rates were similar in age-matched queens and workers and thus are not an explanation. The accumulation of fluorescent AGE pigment has been successfully used as a good measure of cellular senescence in many species. Unlike other animals, AGE pigment level reduced during adult life of queens and workers. This unusual finding suggests female honey bees can either modify, or remove from their body, AGE pigment. Another queen-worker difference is that, as adults, workers eat pollen but queens do not. Pollen is a source of polyunsaturated fatty acids. Its consumption explains the queen-worker difference in membrane fat composition of female adult honey bees which has previously been suggested as a cause of the lifespan difference. We were able to produce "queen-worker" membrane differences in workers by manipulation of diet that did not change worker lifespan and we can, thus, also rule out pollen consumption by workers as an explanation of the dramatic queen-worker lifespan difference.

AB0260 LONG-TERM EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF UPADACITINIB IN PATIENTS FROM CHINA, BRAZIL, AND SOUTH KOREA WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND AN INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO CONVENTIONAL SYNTHETIC DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS: RESULTS AT 64 WEEKS

Background:

Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), showed significant improvements in clinical and functional measures compared with placebo (PBO) up to 12 weeks (wks), in patients (pts) from China, Brazil, and South Korea with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and prior inadequate response to csDMARDs (csDMARD-IR).1

Objectives:

To assess the efficacy and safety of UPA up to 64 wks (long-term extension; LTE) in csDMARD-IR pts with RA from China, Brazil, and South Korea.

Methods:

Pts were randomized to 12 wks of blinded treatment with UPA 15 mg once daily (QD) or PBO, in combination with csDMARDs. From Wk 12 onward, pts could continue to receive open-label UPA 15 mg QD. Efficacy endpoints were analyzed by original randomized treatment group sequences over 64 wks and included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses, and key remission and low disease activity measures. Non-responder imputation was used to handle missing data for binary endpoints. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) per 100 patient-years (PY) were summarized for pts receiving ≥1 dose of UPA from baseline through to Wk 64.

Results:

Of 338 randomized pts who received ≥1 dose of study drug, 310 (91.7%) entered the LTE and 275 (81.4%) completed 64 wks of treatment. Among those initially randomized to UPA, the proportion of pts achieving 20%/50%/70% improvement in ACR criteria, and key remission and low disease activity measures increased over 64 wks of treatment (Figure 1). Improvements from baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and pts’ assessment of pain were observed over 64 wks of UPA treatment (data not shown). By Wk 64, efficacy results for pts who switched from PBO to UPA at Wk 12 followed a similar trajectory to those originally randomized to UPA.

The observed rate of serious infections was 8.1 events/100 PY. Herpes zoster events were mostly non-serious, involving only 1 or 2 dermatomes. Most cases of hepatic disorders were Grade 1 or 2 hepatic transaminase elevations. There was 1 case of venous thromboembolic event (VTE; concurrent pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis [DVT] in a patient with a history of DVT) and 3 cases of malignancy. Adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (Table 1) occurred in 2 pts (1 with non-fatal myocardial infarction and 1 with non-fatal stroke) who had underlying risk factors for cardiovascular disease. There were no deaths, active tuberculosis, or renal dysfunction.

Conclusion:

UPA 15 mg was effective in treating the signs and symptoms of RA and in improving physical function over 64 wks with no new safety signals1 in csDMARD-IR pts with RA from China, Brazil, and South Korea.

References:

[1]Zeng A, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79(Suppl 1):1016 [abstract SAT0160]

Table 1.

TEAEs at Wk 64

Event (E/100 PY)UPA 15 mg(n=322; PY=334.5)Any AE421.5 (399.8–444.1) Serious AE19.1 (14.7–24.4) AE leading to discontinuation of study drug9.0 (6.1–12.8) Deathsa0AEs of special interest Serious infection8.1 (5.3–11.7) Opportunistic infection0.9 (0.2–2.6) Herpes zoster9.0 (6.1–12.8) Hepatic disorder42.2 (35.5–49.7) Gastrointestinal perforation (adjudicated)0.3 (0.0–1.7) Any malignancy (excluding NMSC)0.6 (0.1–2.2) NMSC0.3 (0.0–1.7) MACE (adjudicated)b0.6 (0.1–2.2) VTE (adjudicated)c0.3 (0.0–1.7) Anemia11.1 (7.8–15.2) Neutropenia11.7 (8.3–15.9) Lymphopenia7.8 (5.1–11.4) CPK elevation11.1 (7.8–15.2)

aIncluding non-treatment-emergent deaths. bDefined as cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. cIncluding DVT and pulmonary embolism.

AE, adverse event; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; E, events; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; NMSC, non-melanoma skin cancer

Acknowledgements:

AbbVie funded this study; contributed to its design; participated in data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and in the writing, review, and approval of the abstract. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Yanna Song, PhD, of AbbVie provided statistical support. Medical writing support was provided by Laura Chalmers, PhD, of 2 the Nth (Cheshire, UK), and was funded by AbbVie.

Disclosure of Interests:

Xiaofeng Zeng: None declared, Dongbao Zhao: None declared, Sebastiao Radominski: None declared, MAURO KEISERMAN: None declared, Chang-Keun Lee: None declared, Naomi Martin Employee of: AbbVie employee and may own stock or options, Sebastian Meerwein Employee of: AbbVie employee and may own stock or options, Yunxia Sui Employee of: AbbVie employee and may own stock or options, Won Park: None declared

POS0671 CLINICAL RESPONSES TO UPADACITINIB OR ABATACEPT IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS BY TYPE OF PRIOR BIOLOGIC DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUG: DATA FROM THE PHASE 3 SELECT-CHOICE STUDY

Background:

In the phase 3 double-blind SELECT-CHOICE study of patients (pts) with prior inadequate response (IR) or intolerance to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), upadacitinib (UPA) showed superiority to abatacept (ABA) in change from baseline in 28-joint Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) and in the proportion of pts achieving DAS28(CRP) <2.6 at Week 12.

Objectives:

To describe clinical responses in pts receiving UPA or ABA by number and mechanism of action of prior bDMARDs.

Methods:

612 pts were randomized to once-daily UPA 15 mg or monthly intravenous ABA (<60 kg, 500 mg; 60–100 kg, 750 mg; >100 kg, 1000 mg). All pts continued background therapy with stable conventional synthetic DMARDs. From Week 12, pts who did not achieve ≥20% improvement in both tender and swollen joint counts vs baseline at 2 consecutive visits had background medication(s) adjusted or added. In this post hoc analysis, pts were grouped by the number and/or type of bDMARD received prior to enrollment: 1) lack of efficacy (LoE) to ≥1 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor; 2) LoE to ≥1 interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitor; 3) intolerance to prior bDMARDs; 4) number of prior bDMARDs (1, 2, or ≥3). Mean change from baseline in DAS28(CRP) and DAS28(CRP) <2.6 and other clinical endpoints were evaluated at Weeks 12/24.

Results:

Most pts had LoE to ≥1 TNF inhibitor (536, 87.6%); 96 (15.7%) had LoE to an IL-6 inhibitor; 79 (12.9%) had intolerance to prior bDMARDs; 408 (66.7%), 134 (21.9%), and 64 (10.5%) had received 1, 2, or ≥3 prior bDMARDs, respectively. Mean change from baseline in DAS28(CRP) was generally greater with UPA vs ABA across the different pt subgroups at Weeks 12/24 (Figure 1). Across endpoints, regardless of prior bDMARD therapy (except in those who failed ≥3 prior bDMARDs), UPA and ABA demonstrated similar responses at Week 12 compared with those observed for the overall treatment groups, even with more stringent criteria such as ACR70 and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤2.8 (Table 1. below) Responses at Week 24 followed a similar trend to those at Week 12 for DAS28(CRP) <2.6 and other endpoints (Table 1). The safety profile across subgroups was consistent with each respective treatment in the overall study population (data not shown).

Table 1.

Efficacy endpoints by prior bDMARD subgroup (Week 12 [top] and Week 24 [bottom])a

ACR20ACR50ACR70DAS28(CRP)≤3.2DAS28(CRP) <2.6CDAI ≤10CDAI ≤2.8HAQ-DIMCIDbLoE to ≥1 TNF inhibitorUPA 15 mg n=26375.377.944.959.722.838.849.061.230.446.840.758.69.122.875.574.3ABAn=27364.572.933.748.413.224.927.546.512.529.733.749.82.212.565.266.3LoE to ≥1 IL-6 inhibitorUPA 15 mg n=4870.885.437.566.720.829.245.866.725.041.741.758.36.316.778.378.3ABAn=4877.179.241.756.322.927.125.043.814.629.227.152.12.110.475.075.0Intolerance to prior bDMARDsUPA 15 mgn=4783.076.653.257.417.027.753.257.431.929.844.744.78.514.980.073.3ABAn=3262.571.928.150.00.031.321.956.36.331.321.956.33.19.461.367.71 priorbDMARDUPA 15 mgn=20677.281.151.963.121.838.852.466.032.547.641.761.29.220.979.676.6ABAn=20267.377.735.153.515.833.729.251.512.435.636.155.93.016.366.771.72 priorbDMARDsUPA 15 mgn=6478.176.634.456.323.439.151.662.526.650.045.354.74.723.473.870.5ABAn=7064.364.328.642.94.311.427.141.411.424.328.644.31.48.655.755.7≥3 prior bDMARDsUPA 15 mg n=2955.265.524.144.817.224.127.641.420.727.627.648.310.317.258.672.4ABAn=3565.771.440.040.020.017.128.637.120.020.037.140.02.98.677.174.3

aMissing information was imputed using NRI. bHAQ-DI MCID=reduction from baseline of ≥0.22

ACR20/50/70, 20/50/70% improvement in ACR criteria; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index

Conclusion:

Although sample sizes were small for some subgroups, treatment with UPA led to greater clinical responses vs ABA at Week 12, including in pts with LoE to TNF or IL-6 inhibitors, and those with IR or intolerance to 1, 2, or ≥3 prior bDMARDs.

Acknowledgements:

AbbVie funded this study; contributed to its design; participated in data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and participated in the writing, review, and approval of the abstract. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Medical writing support was provided by Grant Kirkpatrick, MSc of 2 the Nth (Cheshire, UK), and was funded by AbbVie.

Disclosure of Interests:

Andrea Rubbert-Roth Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi, Ricardo Xavier Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Boulos Haraoui Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Gilead, MSD, Pfizer, Sandoz, and UCB, Herbert S.B. Baraf Consultant of: Gilead, Janssen, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Gilead, and Janssen, Maureen Rischmueller Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CSL Behring, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB, Naomi Martin Shareholder of: May own stock or options in AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Yanna Song Shareholder of: May own stock or options in AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Jessica Suboticki Shareholder of: May own stock or options in AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, John Cush Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis.

POS0222 PREDICTORS OF RESPONSE: BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS AND EARLY TREATMENT RESPONSES ASSOCIATED WITH ACHIEVEMENT OF REMISSION AND LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY AMONG UPADACITINIB-TREATED PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Upadacitinib (UPA) 15 mg once daily (QD) has demonstrated efficacy in phase 3 studies of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).1–4 Early prediction of response to treatment with UPA could help to optimize therapy.

Objectives:

To identify baseline (BL) characteristics or Week (Wk) 12 disease activity measures that may predict the achievement of remission (REM) or low disease activity (LDA) at 6 months in patients with RA receiving UPA 15 mg.

Methods:

This ad hoc analysis included patients who were randomized to UPA 15 mg QD, as monotherapy in methotrexate (MTX)-naïve patients (SELECT-EARLY) or in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), in patients with an inadequate response (IR) to MTX (SELECT-COMPARE) or ≥1 tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) (SELECT-BEYOND and SELECT-CHOICE). The association of BL characteristics (including age, disease duration, prior/concomitant treatments, C-reactive protein [CRP], seropositivity, and disease activity) and Wk 12 disease activity parameters with the achievement of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) REM (≤2.8) or LDA (≤10) at Wk 24 (or Wk 26 in SELECT-COMPARE) was assessed by concordance statistics (C-statistics), or area under the receiver operator characteristic curve. C-index values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by fitting a univariate logistic regression model for: demographic and BL characteristics, Wk 12 disease activity measures, and change from BL at Wk 12 in disease activity measures. A multivariate logistic regression with stepwise model selection was also performed. The proportion of patients achieving Wk 24/26 CDAI REM/LDA was stratified by ≥50% improvement from BL in swollen and/or tender joint count in 66/68 joints (SJC66/TJC68).

Results:

A total of 1377 patients were included in the analysis. Across the 4 studies, CDAI REM and LDA were achieved in 11.0–28.4% and 50.0–58.6% of patients, respectively (Table 1). BL demographics and disease characteristics were weakly predictive (C-index <0.70) of Wk 24/26 CDAI REM (C-index 0.49–0.69) or LDA (C-index 0.47–0.65), with the exception of BL Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index in SELECT-BEYOND, which was moderately predictive of CDAI REM (C-index 0.73). Changes from BL in disease activity measures at Wk 12 were weakly or moderately predictive of Wk 24/26 CDAI REM (Figure 1) or LDA. CDAI value at Wk 12 was strongly predictive (C-index >0.80) of Wk 24/26 CDAI REM or LDA. Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using CRP and pain at Wk 12 were strongly predictive of Wk 24/26 CDAI REM (except in SELECT-CHOICE). Physician’s global assessment at Wk 12 was the only common predictor in the multivariate regression models for CDAI REM/LDA at Wk 24/26 across the 4 studies. A greater proportion of patients achieving ≥50% improvement in SJC66 and TJC68 at Wk 12 achieved CDAI REM (16.5–37.8% vs 0–9.4%) or LDA (66.0–72.8% vs 20.9–35.7%) at Wk 24/26 than those who did not.

Table 1.

Achievement of CDAI LDA and REM at Wk 24/26a

SELECT-EARLYSELECT-COMPARESELECT-BEYONDSELECT-CHOICEPatient populationMTX-naïveMTX-IRTNFi-IRTNFi-IRTreatmentUPA 15 mg monotherapy (n=317)UPA 15 mg + MTX(n=651)UPA 15 mg + csDMARD(n=146)UPA 15 mg + csDMARD(n=263)Efficacy at Wk 24/26a, n (%)CDAI REM (≤2.8)90 (28.4)150 (23.0)16 (11.0)60 (22.8)CDAI LDA (≤10)178 (56.2)343 (52.7)73 (50.0)154 (58.6)

a Wk 26 for SELECT-COMPARE only

Conclusion:

BL characteristics did not strongly predict response to UPA, but composite disease activity scores at Wk 12 predicted Wk 24/26 REM/LDA with UPA 15 mg QD across MTX-naïve, MTX-IR, and TNFi-IR patients. ≥50% improvement in SJC/TJC at Wk 12 was also associated with Wk 24/26 REM/LDA.

References:

[1]van Vollenhoven R, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72:1607–20; 2. Genovese MC, et al. Lancet 2018;391:2513–24; 3. Fleischmann R, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1788–800; 4. Rubbert-Roth A, et al. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1511–21.

Acknowledgements:

AbbVie funded this study; contributed to its design; participated in data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and participated in the writing, review, and approval of the abstract. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Medical writing support was provided by Laura Chalmers, PhD, of 2 the Nth (Cheshire, UK), and was funded by AbbVie.

Disclosure of Interests:

Arthur Kavanaugh Consultant of: Janssen, Grant/research support from: Janssen, Zoltán Szekanecz: None declared, Edward C. Keystone Speakers bureau: Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB, Consultant of: Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB, Andrea Rubbert-Roth Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi, Stephen Hall Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Ricardo Xavier: None declared, Joaquim Polido-Pereira: None declared, In-Ho Song Shareholder of: May own stock or options in AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Naomi Martin Shareholder of: May own stock or options in AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Yanna Song Shareholder of: May own stock or options in AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Samuel Anyanwu Shareholder of: May own stock or options in AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Peter Nash Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB.

Long-term outcomes in newly diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients receiving initial triple oral combination therapy: insights from the randomised controlled TRITON study

Introduction

Long-term outcomes are important in PAH.

Purpose

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of initial triple oral therapy with selexipag, macitentan and tadalafil vs initial double oral therapy with macitentan and tadalafil in PAH.

Methods

TRITON, a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study, randomised 1:1 newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve PAH patients to initial triple vs double therapy. Macitentan and tadalafil were initiated at randomisation and selexipag/placebo at day 15 (uptitrated to wk 12). Efficacy and safety were assessed in a blinded manner until the last patient randomised completed wk 26 (end of observation period). Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; primary endpoint) and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) were assessed at wk 26. Other secondary endpoints included time to first disease progression event (centrally adjudicated) to end of observation period +7 days. Time to all-cause mortality up to end of observation period was analysed post-hoc.

Results

247 patients were randomised to initial triple (n=123) or initial double therapy (n=124); baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Median follow-up was 77.6 (initial triple) and 75.8 wks (initial double). Initial triple and initial double therapy improved PVR (by 54% and 52%) and 6MWD (by 55 and 56 m), with no difference between groups. A 41% reduction in the risk of first disease progression event driven by PAH-related hospitalisation and all-cause death was observed with initial triple vs initial double therapy (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.32–1.09, p=0.087; Figure). Two patients died in the initial triple vs 9 in the initial double therapy group (hazard ratio 0.23, 95% CI 0.05–1.04). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profiles of the study drugs.

Conclusions

In TRITON, assessments at wk 26 showed marked improvements in both treatment arms, with no difference between groups. Exploratory analysis indicated a signal for improved long-term outcome with initial triple versus initial double therapy.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Minimal Data Set for Remote Clinical Consultations in Restorative Dentistry - An Exploratory Case Study

In the UK, general dental practitioners (GDPs) in primary care are supported in the patient care decision-making-process by specialist consultants in secondary care centres. The consultation, undertaken as an in-person consultation between the patient and the consultant, consists of a comprehensive clinical assessment; The outcome is conveyed to the patient, GDP and other stakeholders as appropriate. Tele-dentistry has the potential to provide an alternative approach through a Remote Clinical Consultation (RCC). To make the encounter as efficient as possible it is helpful to identify data that is essential for the safe and effective conduct of the process. The aims of this exploratory case study are (i) to discriminate between data sets of specialist clinical consultations in endodontics, periodontics and prosthodontics; and (ii) to investigate the opinions of secondary care providers for in-person and RCCs. An online questionnaire was administered to secondary care specialty clinicians in restorative dentistry in the UK (Specialist consultants and senior trainee grades). Results: It is feasible to identify a generic minimum data set for specific consultation processes specifics vary between specialties and experience of the clinician. Views of the consultation process, in-person vs remote, varied between consultants and trainee grades.

State-wide utilization and performance of traditional and cell-free DNA-based prenatal testing pathways: the Victorian Perinatal Record Linkage (PeRL) study

OBJECTIVES

To perform individual record linkage of women undergoing screening with cell-free DNA (cfDNA), combined first-trimester screening (CFTS), second-trimester serum screening (STSS), and/or prenatal and postnatal cytogenetic testing with the aim to (1) obtain population-based estimates of utilization of prenatal screening and invasive diagnosis, (2) analyze the performance of different prenatal screening strategies, and (3) report the residual risk of any major chromosomal abnormality following a low-risk aneuploidy screening result.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of women residing in the state of Victoria, Australia, who underwent prenatal screening or invasive prenatal diagnosis in 2015. Patient-funded cfDNA referrals from multiple providers were merged with state-wide results for government-subsidized CFTS, STSS and invasive diagnostic procedures. Postnatal cytogenetic results from products of conception and infants up to 12 months of age were obtained to ascertain cases of false-negative screening results and atypical chromosomal abnormalities. Individual record linkage was performed using LinkageWiz^TM .

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 79 140 births and 66 166 (83.6%) women underwent at least one form of aneuploidy screening. Linkage data were complete for 93.5% (n = 61 877) of women who underwent screening, and of these, 73.2% (n = 45 275) had CFTS alone, 20.2% (n = 12 486) had cfDNA alone; 5.3% (n = 3268) had STSS alone, 1.3% (n = 813) had both CFTS and cfDNA, and < 0.1% (n = 35) had both STSS and cfDNA. CFTS had a combined sensitivity for trisomies 21 (T21), 18 (T18) and 13 (T13) of 89.57% (95% CI, 82.64-93.93%) for a screen-positive rate (SPR) of 2.94%. There were 12 false-negative results in the CFTS pathway, comprising 10 cases of T21, one of T18 and one of T13. cfDNA had a combined sensitivity for T21, T18 and T13 of 100% (95% CI, 95.00-100%) for a SPR of 1.21%. When high-risk cfDNA results for any chromosome (including the sex chromosomes) and failed cfDNA tests were treated as screen positives, the SPR for cfDNA increased to 2.42%. The risk of any major chromosomal abnormality (including atypical abnormalities) detected on prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing after a low-risk screening result was 1 in 1188 for CFTS (n = 37) and 1 in 762 for cfDNA (n = 16) (P = 0.13). The range of chromosomal abnormalities detected after a low-risk cfDNA result included pathogenic copy-number variants (n = 6), triploidy (n = 3), rare autosomal trisomies (n = 3) and monosomy X (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Our state-wide record-linkage analysis delineated the utilization and clinical performance of the multitude of prenatal screening pathways available to pregnant women. The sensitivity of cfDNA for T21, T18 and T13 was clearly superior to that of CFTS. While there was no statistically significant difference in the residual risk of any major chromosomal abnormality after a low-risk CFTS or cfDNA result, there were fewer live infants diagnosed with a major chromosomal abnormality in the cfDNA cohort. These data provide valuable population-based evidence to inform practice recommendations and health policies. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

SAT0151 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF UPADACITINIB VERSUS ABATACEPT IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND PRIOR INADEQUATE RESPONSE OR INTOLERANCE TO BIOLOGIC DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTI-RHEUMATIC DRUGS (SELECT-CHOICE): A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED PHASE 3 TRIAL

Background:

Upadacitinib (UPA) is an oral, reversible, selective JAK 1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The efficacy/safety of UPA has been demonstrated in phase 3 studies, including superiority to adalimumab in patients (pts) with prior inadequate response (IR) to methotrexate.1-4

Objectives:

To assess the efficacy/safety of UPA vs abatacept (ABA) in pts with prior IR or intolerance to biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs).

Methods:

Pts were randomized to once daily UPA 15 mg or intravenous ABA (at Day 1, Weeks [Wks] 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 [< 60 kg: 500 mg; 60-100 kg: 750 mg; >100 kg: 1,000 mg]), with all pts continuing background stable csDMARDs. The study was double-blind for 24 wks. Starting at Wk 12, pts who did not achieve ≥20% improvement from baseline (BL) in both tender and swollen joint counts at two consecutive visits, had background medication(s) adjusted or initiated. The primary endpoint was change from BL in DAS28(CRP) at Wk 12 (non-inferiority). The non-inferiority of UPA vs ABA was tested using the 95% CI of treatment difference against a non-inferiority margin of 0.6. The two key secondary endpoints at Wk 12 were change from BL in DAS28(CRP) and the proportion of pts achieving clinical remission (CR) based on DAS28(CRP), defined as DAS28(CRP) <2.6. Both endpoints were to demonstrate the superiority of UPA vs. ABA. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are reported up to Wk 24 for all pts who received at least one dose of study drug.

Results:

Of 612 pts treated; 67% of pts had received 1 prior bDMARD, 22% received 2 prior bDMARDs, and 10% received ≥ 3 prior bDMARDs. 549 (90%) completed 24 wks of treatment. Common reasons for study drug discontinuation were AEs (UPA, 3.6%; ABA, 2.6%) and withdrawal of consent (UPA, 1.7%; ABA, 2.6%).

Non-inferiority and superiority were met for UPA vs ABA at Wk 12 for change from BL in DAS28(CRP) (-2.52 vs -2.00; -0.52 [-0.69, -0.35]; p <0.001 for UPA vs ABA). UPA also demonstrated superiority to ABA in achieving DAS28(CRP) <2.6 (30.0% vs 13.3%; p <0.001 for UPA vs ABA; Figure 1). Improvements in disease activity and remission rates were maintained through Wk 24. The proportions of pts achieving low disease activity (defined as DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2), ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses were greater with UPA compared with ABA at Wk 12 (nominal p <0.05). More stringent outcome measures – CR, ACR50, and ACR70 responses - remained higher with UPA than ABA through Wk 24 (nominal p <0.05). Incidence of serious TEAEs, AEs leading to discontinuation, hepatic disorders, and CPK elevations were numerically higher with UPA versus ABA (Figure 2). Eight cases of herpes zoster were reported (4 in each treatment arm). No malignancies were reported. One case of adjudicated MACE, two adjudicated cases of VTE (1 pt with DVT and 1 pt with PE; both pts had at least one risk factor for VTE), and one treatment-emergent death were reported with UPA.

Conclusion:

In RA pts with a prior IR or intolerance to bDMARDs, UPA demonstrated superior improvement in signs and symptoms vs ABA based on change in DAS28(CRP) and in achieving CR at Wk 12. The safety profile of UPA was consistent with the phase 3 RA studies with no new risks identified.

References:

[1]Burmester GR, et al. Lancet. 2018;391(10139):2503-12

[2]Fleischmann R, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(11):1788-800

[3]Genovese MC, et al. Lancet. 2018;391(10139):2513-24

[4]Smolen JS, et al. Lancet. 2019;393(10188):2303-11

Disclosure of Interests:

Andrea Rubbert-Roth Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Chugai, Pfizer, Roche, Janssen, Lilly, Sanofi, Amgen, Novartis, Jeffrey Enejosa Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Aileen Pangan Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Ricardo Xavier Consultant of: AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Roche, Boulos Haraoui Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Pfizer, Sandoz, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, and UCB, Maureen Rischmueller Consultant of: Abbvie, Bristol-Meyer-Squibb, Celgene, Glaxo Smith Kline, Hospira, Janssen Cilag, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Nasser Khan Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Ying Zhang Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Naomi Martin Shareholder of: AbbVie Inc., Employee of: AbbVie Inc., Mark C. Genovese Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Merck Serono, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GSK, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., RPharm, Sanofi Genzyme, Consultant of: Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Merck Serono, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GSK, Novartis, RPharm, Sanofi Genzyme

The effect of crown fabrication process on the fatigue life of the tooth-crown structure

OBJECTIVE

To compare the fatigue strength of lithium disilicate ceramic crowns when cemented as a compound structure, as a function of the manufacturing process and the type of ceramic variation.

METHOD

A typodont maxillary first premolar was prepared for an all-ceramic crown in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines for monolithic ceramic crowns (IPS e. max®; Ivoclar-Vivadent, Liechtenstein). 60 dies were duplicated in a polymer with a Young's Modulus closely matched to dentine (Alpha die, Schütz GmbH). Three different crown fabrication techniques were used (n = 20): (i) Manually applied wax spacer and pressed-crown; (ii) digitally scanned preparation, CAD-printed wax-pattern (D76PLUS, Solidscape Inc.) and pressed-crown; (iii) digitally scanned preparation and machined-crown (CEREC-inLab® v3.6 Sirona GmbH). Resin-based cement (Variolink-II®, Ivoclar-Vivadent, Liechtenstein) was employed with a standardised mechanised cementation technique to apply a controlled axial cementation pressure [Universal testing machine (Lloyd LRX®, Lloyd Materials Testing Inc)]. The samples were subjected to fatigue life testing with a cyclic impact load of 453 N for 1.25 × 10⁶cycles at 37C⁰ and 1 Hz frequency until the point of fracture.

RESULT

There was a significant difference in the resistance to fatigue loading between the three groups. Weibull probability analysis and the α and β Weibull parameters indicate that the teeth restored with a 'Manually-applied wax spacer and pressed-crown' are best able to resist cyclic fatigue loading. They also have the most uniform interface geometry.

CONCLUSION

Teeth restored with IPS e. max® crowns constructed by manually applied wax spacer and pressing, have a more uniform interface and a greater structural integrity than wax CAD-printed patterns or CAD-CAM crowns.

Genome-wide association and epidemiological analyses reveal common genetic origins between uterine leiomyomata and endometriosis

Uterine leiomyomata (UL) are the most common neoplasms of the female reproductive tract and primary cause for hysterectomy, leading to considerable morbidity and high economic burden. Here we conduct a GWAS meta-analysis in 35,474 cases and 267,505 female controls of European ancestry, identifying eight novel genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 10^-8) loci, in addition to confirming 21 previously reported loci, including multiple independent signals at 10 loci. Phenotypic stratification of UL by heavy menstrual bleeding in 3409 cases and 199,171 female controls reveals genome-wide significant associations at three of the 29 UL loci: 5p15.33 (TERT), 5q35.2 (FGFR4) and 11q22.3 (ATM). Four loci identified in the meta-analysis are also associated with endometriosis risk; an epidemiological meta-analysis across 402,868 women suggests at least a doubling of risk for UL diagnosis among those with a history of endometriosis. These findings increase our understanding of genetic contribution and biology underlying UL development, and suggest overlapping genetic origins with endometriosis.

P5308Mediterranean-style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Background

Observational studies have confirmed the benefits of adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern on cardiovascular disease (CVD) but the randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence is limited.

Objective

To determine the effectiveness of a Mediterranean-style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of CVD.

Methods

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, DARE, HTA, NHS EED and trial registers (September 2018). We selected RCTs in healthy adults and adults at high risk of CVD (primary prevention) and those with established CVD (secondary prevention). Both of the following key components were required for our definition of a Mediterranean-style diet: high monounsaturated/saturated fat ratio and a high intake of plant based foods, including fruits, vegetables, and legumes. The intervention could be dietary advice, provision of relevant foods or both. The comparison group received either no intervention, minimal intervention, usual care or another dietary intervention. Outcomes included clinical events and CVD risk factors. We included only studies with follow-up periods of 3 months or more.

Results

Overall, 30 RCTs (12,461 participants randomised) and 7 ongoing trials met our inclusion criteria, whereas 22 primary prevention trials and 6 secondary prevention trials were analysed. Low quality evidence shows little or no effect of the PREDIMED (7747 randomised) intervention (advice to follow a Mediterranean diet plus supplemental extra virgin olive oil or tree nuts) compared to a low fat diet on CVD mortality (HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.5, 1.32)) or total mortality (HR 1.0 (95% CI 0.81, 1.24)) over 4.8 years. There was however a reduction in the number of strokes with the PREDIMED intervention (HR 0.6 (95% CI 0.45, 0.8), moderate quality evidence). For secondary prevention, in the Lyon Diet Heart Study (605 CVD patients), there was moderate quality evidence of a reduction in CVD mortality (HR 0.35 (95% CI 0.15, 0.82)) and total mortality (HR 0.44 (95% CI 0.21, 0.92)) with the intervention, over 46 months. For CVD risk factors, in primary prevention trials, there was low quality evidence for a possible small reduction in total cholesterol (−0.16 mmol/L (95% CI −0.32, 0.00), and moderate quality evidence for a reduction in SBP (−2.99 mmHg (95% CI −3.45, −2.53)) and DBP (−2.0 mmHg (95% CI −2.29, −1.71)). In secondary prevention trials, there was moderate quality evidence of no effect of a Mediterranean-style diet on lipid levels and low or very low quality evidence for blood pressure.

Conclusions

Despite the relatively large number of studies included in this review, there is still some uncertainty regarding the effects of a Mediterranean-style diet on clinical endpoints and CVD risk factors for both primary and secondary prevention. The ongoing studies may provide more certainty in the future.

Honeybee caste lipidomics in relation to life-history stages and the long life of the queen

Honey bees have evolved a system in which fertilised eggs transit through the same developmental stages but can become either workers or queens. This difference is determined by their diet through development. Whereas workers live for weeks (normally 2-6 weeks), queens can live for years. Unfertilised eggs also develop through the same stages but result in a short living male caste (drones). Workers and drones are fed pollen throughout their late larval and adult life stages, while queens are fed exclusively on royal jelly and do not eat pollen. Pollen has high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) while royal jelly has a negligible amount of PUFA. To investigate the role of dietary PUFA lipids, and their oxidation in the longevity difference of honey bees, membrane fatty acid composition of the three castes was characterised at six different life-history stages (larvae, pupa, emergent, and different adult stages) through mass spectrometry. All castes were found to share a similar membrane phospholipid composition during early larval development. However, at pupation, drones and workers increased their level of PUFA, whilst queens increased their level of monounsaturated fatty acids. After emergence, worker bees further increased their level of PUFA by 5-fold across most phospholipid classes. In contrast, the membrane phospholipids of adult queens remained highly monounsaturated throughout their adult life. We postulate that this diet-induced increase in membrane PUFA results in more oxidative damage and is potentially responsible for the much shorter lifespans of worker bees compared to long-living queens.

Acinetobacter - the trojan horse of infection control?

BACKGROUND

Five cases of multi-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii (MRA) producing OXA-23 and OXA-51 occurred in a regional burn intensive care unit (BICU). Three were repatriated from other parts of the world (Dubai and Mumbai) and colonized on admission. Despite optimal precautions, two patients acquired MRA. Both had been nursed in the same room.

METHODS

Multi-disciplinary outbreak investigation of MRA in a regional BICU.

FINDINGS

The mechanism of transfer for the first case is thought to have been contaminated air from theatre activity releasing MRA bacteria into the communal corridor. No MRA patients went to theatre between the first and second acquired cases. The mechanism of transfer for the second case is thought to have been via a shower unit that was decontaminated inadequately between patients.

CONCLUSION

In an outbreak where contact precautions and environmental cleaning are optimal, it is important to give careful consideration to other mechanisms of spread. If there is a failure to do this, it is likely that the true causes of transmission will not be addressed and the problem will recur. It is recommended that burn theatres within burn facilities should be designed to operate at negative pressure; this is the opposite of normal operating theatre ventilation. Where showers are used, both the shower head and the hose should be changed after a patient with a resistant organism. The role of non-contact disinfection (e.g. hydrogen peroxide dispersal) should be reconsidered, and constant vigilance should be given to any 'trojan horse' item in the room.