Community-Based Phase IIIB Trial of Three UPFRONT Bortezomib-Based Myeloma Regimens

PURPOSE

The US community-based, phase IIIB UPFRONT trial was designed to compare three frontline bortezomib-based regimens in transplantation-ineligible patients with myeloma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (N = 502) were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to 24 weeks (eight 21-day cycles) of induction with bortezomib-dexamethasone (VD; n = 168; intravenous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), days 1, 4, 8, and 11 plus oral dexamethasone 20 mg, days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 [cycles 1 to 4], or 1, 2, 4, and 5 [cycles 5 to 8]), bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD; n = 167; bortezomib and dexamethasone as before plus oral thalidomide 100 mg, days 1 to 21), or bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP; n = 167; bortezomib as before plus oral melphalan 9 mg/m(2) and oral prednisone 60 mg/m(2), days 1 to 4, every other cycle), followed by 25 weeks (five 35-day cycles) of bortezomib maintenance (1.6 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15, and 22). The primary end point was progression-free survival.

RESULTS

After 42.7 months' median follow-up, median progression-free survival with VD, VTD, and VMP was 14.7, 15.4, and 17.3 months, respectively; median overall survival was 49.8, 51.5, and 53.1 months, with no significant differences among treatments for either end point (global P = .46 and P = .79, respectively, Wald test). Overall response rates were 73% (VD), 80% (VTD), and 70% (VMP). Adverse events were more common with VTD than VD or VMP. Bortezomib maintenance was feasible without producing cumulative toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Although all bortezomib-containing regimens produced good outcomes, VTD and VMP did not appear to offer an advantage over VD in transplantation-ineligible patients with myeloma treated in US community practice.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of APF530 (extended-release granisetron) in patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: results of two Phase II trials

BACKGROUND

Despite advances with new therapies, a significant proportion of patients (>30%) suffer delayed-onset chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) despite use of antiemetics. APF530 is a sustained-release subcutaneous (SC) formulation of granisetron for preventing CINV. APF530 pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy were studied in two open-label, single-dose Phase II trials (C2005-01 and C2007-01, respectively) in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy or highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

METHODS

In C2005-01, 45 patients received APF530 250, 500, or 750 mg SC (granisetron 5, 10, or 15 mg, respectively). In C2007-01, 35 patients were randomized to APF530 250 or 500 mg SC. Injections were given 30 to 60 minutes before single-day moderately emetogenic chemotherapy or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Plasma granisetron was measured from predose to 168 hours after study drug administration. Safety and efficacy were also evaluated.

RESULTS

APF530 pharmacokinetics were dose proportional, with slow absorption and elimination of granisetron after a single SC dose. Median time to maximum plasma concentration and half-life were similar for APF530 250 and 500 mg in both trials, with no differences between the groups receiving moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Exposure to granisetron was maintained at a therapeutic level over the delayed-onset phase, at least 168 hours. Adverse events in both trials were as expected for granisetron; injection site reactions (eg, erythema and induration) were predominantly mild and seen in ≤20% of patients. Complete responses (no emesis, with no rescue medication) were obtained in the acute, delayed, and overall phases in ≥80% and ≥75% of patients in both trials with the 250 and 500 mg doses, respectively.

CONCLUSION

After a single injection of APF530, there were dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and sustained concentrations of granisetron over 168 hours. The 250 and 500 mg doses were well tolerated and maintained therapeutic granisetron levels for ≥5 days.

Vaccination of castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with TroVax (MVA-5T4) in combination with docetaxel: a randomized phase II trial

The attenuated vaccinia virus, modified vaccinia Ankara, has been engineered to deliver the tumor antigen 5T4 (TroVax®). Here, we report results from a randomized open-label phase II trial in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients in which TroVax was administered in combination with docetaxel and compared against docetaxel alone. The aim was to recruit 80 patients (40 per arm), but the study was terminated early due to recruitment challenges. Therefore, this paper reports the comparative safety and immunological and clinical efficacy in 25 patients, 12 of whom were treated with TroVax plus docetaxel and 13 with docetaxel alone. 5T4-specific immune responses were monitored throughout the study. Clinical responses were assessed by measuring changes in tumor burden by CT and bone scan and by quantifying PSA concentrations. TroVax was well tolerated in all patients. Of 10 immunologically evaluable patients, 6 mounted 5T4-specific antibody responses. Patients treated with TroVax plus docetaxel showed a greater median progression-free survival of 9.67 months compared with 5.10 months for patients on the docetaxel alone arm (P = 0.097; HR = 0.31; 95% CI 0.08-1.24). Importantly, a pre-treatment biomarker previously demonstrated to predict 5T4 immune response and treatment benefit showed a strong association with 5T4 antibody response and a statistically significant association with progression-free survival in patients treated with TroVax plus docetaxel, but not docetaxel alone.

Randomized open-label phase II study of decitabine in patients with low- or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

PURPOSE

This open-label, randomized phase II trial assessed efficacy and tolerability of two low-dose regimens of subcutaneous (SC) decitabine in patients with low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received decitabine 20 mg/m(2) SC per day for 3 consecutive days on days 1, 2, and 3 every 28 days (schedule A) or 20 mg/m(2) SC per day once every 7 days on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days (schedule B) for up to 1 year. Primary efficacy end point was overall improvement rate (OIR: complete remission [CR], partial remission [PR], marrow CR [mCR], or hematologic improvement [HI]). Secondary end points were HI, transfusion independence, cytogenetic response, overall survival (OS), and time to acute myeloid leukemia or death.

RESULTS

Efficacy and safety populations were identical: schedule A, n = 43; schedule B, n = 22. Median time from MDS diagnosis to treatment was 3.6 months; 89% had de novo MDS. The trial was terminated early on achievement of protocol-defined OIR superiority of schedule A over schedule B; OIR was 23% for schedule A (seven CRs, three HIs) and 23% for schedule B (one mCR, one PR, three HIs). No differences were observed in secondary end points. Median OS was not reached; approximately 70% of patients were alive at 500 days. Patients in schedule A (67%) and schedule B (59%) were RBC/platelet independent on study. The most frequent drug-related adverse events overall were neutropenia (28% v 36%), anemia (23% v 18%), and thrombocytopenia (16% v 32%).

CONCLUSION

In this phase II study, low-dose decitabine showed promising results in patients with low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS.

Abstract LB-294: Determination of JAK2V617F allele burden in a phase II study of patients with myelofibrosis treated with SAR302503 using a sensitive and robust allele-specific qPCR assay

Janus kinase-2 (JAK2)/STAT pathway activation is commonly observed in myeloproliferative neoplasms and plays an important role in disease development and progression. The V617F activating mutation in the JAK2 pseudokinase domain is found in 95% of patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and in 50-70% of patients with primary myelofibrosis (MF) or essential thrombocythemia (ET). Studies have shown the clinical efficacy of JAK2 inhibitors in treating MF in terms of a reduction in splenomegaly and relief of constitutional symptoms. A reduction in the JAK2V617F allele burden after treatment with a JAK2-targeted agent could be a surrogate for a disease-modifying effect of this therapy. To demonstrate this, a robust method that can accurately measure the JAK2V617F allele burden is required. Here, we report the development of a sensitive quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay to determine the JAK2V617F allele burden in patients treated with SAR302503, the validation of the assay in a Phase 0 clinical study and implementation in a phase II study using samples from patients with MF. The assay demonstrated robust performance, with high sensitivity (LLOD=0.05% and LLOQ=0.5%) and accuracy. A phase 0 study in MF, PV, and ET patients showed that (1) there was minimal intra-subject sampling variability in JAK2V617F allele burden, and (2) whole-blood samples are stable for at least 48 hours at ambient conditions for DNA preparation without a significant impact on JAK2V617F allele burden measurement.Of the 31 patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF enrolled in a phase II clinical study (NCT01420770), baseline samples were available for 29 patients and of these, 26 were JAK2V617F-positive using this assay. Of the 19/26 patients for whom samples were available at all 3 time points, the median allele burden was 93% at baseline, 87% at the end of Cycle 3, and 78% at the end of Cycle 6. Among the 24 patients who were JAK2V617F-positive and for whom spleen measurements were available at the end of Cycle 6, a total of 15 (63%) had a spleen response (≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume by MRI versus baseline). In contrast, two JAK2V617F-negative patients did not have a spleen response. Patients with baseline allele burden levels of 0 to <25%, 25% to 75%, and ≥75% showed spleen response rates of 50%, 44%, and 69%, respectively, at the end of Cycle 6. JAK2V617F allele burden will continue to be assessed every 3 cycles. Longer follow up is needed to determine the clinical effect of allele burden reduction.

Citation Format: Feng Liu, Moshe Talpaz, Animesh Pardanani, Catriona Jamieson, Nashat Gabrail, Ayalew Tefferi, Tianlei Lei, Rita Greco, Francisco Adrian, Nikki Daskalakis, Claudia Lebedinsky, Pamela Cohen, Donald Bergstrom. Determination of JAK2V617F allele burden in a phase II study of patients with myelofibrosis treated with SAR302503 using a sensitive and robust allele-specific qPCR assay. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-294. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-LB-294

Effect of the cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumours, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Bortezomib, an antineoplastic for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, undergoes metabolism through oxidative deboronation by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, primarily CYP3A4 and CYP2C19. Omeprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor, is primarily metabolized by and demonstrates high affinity for CYP2C19. This study investigated whether coadministration of omeprazole affected the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety profile of bortezomib in patients with advanced cancer. The variability of bortezomib pharmacokinetics with CYP enzyme polymorphism was also investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This open-label, crossover, pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study was conducted at seven institutions in the US and Europe between January 2005 and August 2006. Patients who had advanced solid tumours, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma, were aged >/=18 years, weighed >/=50 kg and had a life expectancy of >/=3 months were eligible. Patients received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 for two 21-day cycles, plus omeprazole 40 mg in the morning of days 6-10 and in the evening of day 8 in either cycle 1 (sequence 1) or cycle 2 (sequence 2). On day 21 of cycle 2, patients benefiting from therapy could continue to receive bortezomib for six additional cycles. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation were collected prior to and at various timepoints after bortezomib administration on day 8 of cycles 1 and 2. Blood samples for pharmacogenomics were also collected. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis of plasma concentration-time data for bortezomib administration on day 8 of cycles 1 and 2, using WinNonlin version 4.0.1.a software. The pharmacodynamic profile was assessed using a whole-blood 20S proteasome inhibition assay.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (median age 64 years) were enrolled, 12 in sequence 1 and 15 in sequence 2, including eight and nine pharmacokinetic-evaluable patients, respectively. Bortezomib pharmacokinetic parameters were similar when bortezomib was administered alone or with omeprazole (maximum plasma concentration 120 vs 123 ng/mL; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 72 hours 129 vs 135 ng . h/mL). The pharmacodynamic parameters were also similar (maximum effect 85.8% vs 93.7%; area under the percent inhibition-time curve over 72 hours 4052 vs 3910 % x h); the differences were not statistically significant. Pharmacogenomic analysis revealed no meaningful relationships between CYP enzyme polymorphisms and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters. Toxicities were generally similar between patients in sequence 1 and sequence 2, and between cycle 1 and cycle 2 in both treatment sequences. Among 26 evaluable patients, 13 (50%) were assessed as benefiting from bortezomib at the end of cycle 2 and continued to receive treatment.

CONCLUSION

No impact on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety profile of bortezomib was seen with coadministration of omeprazole. Concomitant administration of bortezomib and omeprazole is unlikely to cause clinically significant drug-drug interactions and is unlikely to have an impact on the efficacy or safety of bortezomib.

Phase III study of sustained release granisetron (APF530) compared to palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)

9627

Background: APF530 is a polymeric formulation of granisetron providing sustained drug release over 5 days. Two doses (5 and 10 mg) of subcutaneous APF530 were evaluated in comparison to 0.25 mg intravenous palonosetron. Efficacy was evaluated in acute (0–24 hrs) and delayed (24–120 hrs) CINV among patients receiving moderate (MEC) or highly (HEC) emetogenic chemotherapy. Methods: Randomized, blinded patients (n=1,395) were stratified into MEC or HEC according to Hesketh et al 1999, and assigned to receive either dose of APF530 or palonosetron. Dexamethasone use was standardized based on the emetogenic strata. Patient diaries recorded emetic episodes, nausea and rescue medications over a 5-day period. Primary endpoint was Complete Response (CR), defined as no emetic episodes and no rescue medication. Non-inferiority to palonosetron was declared if the lower bound of the CI for the difference was above -15%. Results: APF530 was well tolerated. Adverse events were consistent with those previously reported for granisetron. For APF530 Tmax was observed about 24 hrs with sustained levels over 120 hrs. For MEC acute phase CR rates of 74.8% (n=214), 76.9% (n=212) and 75.0% (n=208) were observed for 5 mg, 10 mg APF530 and palonosetron, respectively. Delayed phase CR rates of 51.4%, 59.0% and 57.7% were observed for 5 mg, 10 mg APF530 and palonosetron, respectively. For HEC acute phase CR rates of 77.7% (n=229), 81.3% (n=240) and 80.7% (n=238) were observed for 5 mg, 10 mg APF530 and palonosetron, respectively. Delayed phase CR rates of 64.6%, 68.3% and 66.4% were observed for 5 mg, 10 mg APF530 and palonosetron, respectively. Efficacy was maintained with APF530 over multiple cycles (up to 4). Conclusions: Both doses of APF530 were non-inferior to palonosetron with respect to CR during the acute phase following MEC and HEC. Only the higher dose of APF530 (10 mg granisetron) was non-inferior to palonosetron during the delayed phase of MEC. Both doses of APF530 were comparable to the CR rates of palonosetron during the delayed phase of HEC.

[Table: see text]

A phase 2 clinical trial of deforolimus (AP23573, MK-8669), a novel mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies

PURPOSE

Deforolimus (AP23573), a novel non-prodrug rapamycin analogue, inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin, a downstream effector of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and nutrient-sensing pathways. A phase 2 trial was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of single-agent deforolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Eligible patients were assigned to one of five disease-specific, parallel cohorts and given 12.5 mg deforolimus as a 30-minute infusion once daily for 5 days every 2 weeks. A Simon two-stage design was used for each cohort. Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor response were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients received deforolimus as follows: cohort 1 23 acute myelogenous leukemia, two myelodysplastic syndrome and one chronic myelogenous leukemia in nonlymphoid blast phase; cohort 2, one acute lymphocytic leukemia; cohort 3, nine agnogenic myeloid metaplasia; cohort 4, eight chronic lymphocytic leukemia; cohort 5, nine mantle cell lymphoma and two T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Most patients were heavily pretreated. Of the 52 evaluable patients, partial responses were noted in five (10%), two of seven agnogenic myeloid metaplasia and three of nine mantle cell lymphoma. Hematologic improvement/stable disease was observed in 21 (40%). Common treatment-related adverse events, which were generally mild and reversible, were mouth sores, fatigue, nausea, and thrombocytopenia. Decreased levels of phosphorylated 4E-BP1 in 9 of 11 acute myelogenous leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome patients after therapy showed mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition by deforolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

Deforolimus was well-tolerated in patients with heavily pretreated hematologic malignancies, and antitumor activity was observed. Further investigation of deforolimus alone and in combination with other therapeutic agents is warranted in patients with selected hematologic malignancies.

The Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Sorafenib (ARCCS) expanded access trial in North America: Safety and efficacy

5011

Background: A prior phase III trial (TARGETs) demonstrated that sorafenib (SOR) doubled median progression-free survival versus placebo in previously treated clear cell renal cell cancer (RCC) patients (pts). The ARCCS trial made SOR available to a broader range of RCC pts through an expanded access program. Methods: This open-label, nonrandomized trial enrolled pts with advanced RCC not eligible for, or without access to, other SOR clinical trials; ECOG PS 0–2 with waivers granted for pts with ECOG PS 3–4; age =15 yrs; and adequate prior treatment of brain metastases. Major exclusion criteria included treatment <4 wks prior, life expectancy <2 mos, uncontrolled hypertension, and severe renal impairment requiring dialysis. Objectives were to analyze the safety and efficacy (response by RECIST) of 400 mg bid SOR in a community-based setting. Enrollment ceased on 12/20/05 when SOR became commercially available in the US, and those with no prior therapy or non-clear cell RCC continued in an extension protocol. Enrollment completed in Canada in 8/06. Results: A total of 2488 pts were valid for safety: 69% male with median age 63 yrs and most (83%) had prior nephrectomy; histologies included 78% clear-cell, 7% papillary, 1% chromophobe, and <1% collecting duct and oncocytoma. Median time from diagnosis for all pts was 1.4 yrs (range <1–34). Of those pts receiving prior therapy (n=1249), treatments included interferon alfa (54%), interleukin 2 (43%), bevacizumab (23%), thalidomide (12%), and sunitinib (2%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurring in > 2% pts were hand- foot skin reaction 7.2%, fatigue 5.3%, hypertension 4.4%, rash/desquamation 4%, dehydration and dyspnea 2.7%, and diarrhea 2.5%. Efficacy assessment, mainly PFS, was limited by the short median time (14 wks) on study due to many pts enrolling during the last 2 months of the study. Of 1,850 pts evaluable for response, 17.5% had unconfirmed PR. One (0.1%), 67 (3.6%), 1479 (79.9%) and 303 (16.4%) had CR, PR, SD, and PD, respectively. Conclusions: ARCCS pts were representative of the broader range of RCC pts in the community including those excluded from previous SOR trials. Toxicity and response rates were similar to those reported previously, supporting the generalizability of the phase III trial data.

[Table: see text]

A phase III randomized controlled study comparing iron sucrose intravenously (IV) to no iron treatment of anemia in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) therapy

9109

Background: The effect of using IV iron sucrose in managing cancer chemotherapy-related anemia has not been previously reported. To investigate this issue, we conducted a randomized study of IV iron sucrose in patients (pts) with cancer chemotherapy-related anemia who completed 8 prior wks of ESA therapy. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, open label, Phase III clinical trial enrolled 375 pts with chemotherapy induced anemia (Hgb levels = 10.0 g/dL) and was conducted in 2 stages. During Stage I (8-wk duration), pts received treatment with fixed ESA doses (100-mcg of darbepoetin or 40,000 units epoetin wkly or 200 mcg of darbepoetin every other wk). Pts were classified as either ESA responders (= 1 g/dL increase in Hgb) or ESA non-responders with each group randomized (Stage 2) separately to receive either 12 wks of fixed doses of ESA plus up to 1,500 mg of iron sucrose (given in 3 divided doses of up to 500mg) or 12 wks of fixed doses of ESA alone. Laboratories (including iron indices and acute phase reactants), quality of life and adverse events were assessed at baseline and throughout. Results: Iron sucrose plus ESA compared to ESA alone resulted in greater mean maximum Hgb levels and greater number of pts who achieved Hgb increases = 2.0 and ≥ 3.0 g/dl in both prior ESA responders and non-responders. There was also a statistically significant improvement in fatigue and iron stores in the iron sucrose treated pts. Baseline iron status did not predict responsiveness to iron sucrose therapy. Three serious but non-life threatening iron sucrose related adverse events were observed including one case of significant, transient hypotension in a female weighing 50 kg. Conclusions: IV iron sucrose increased Hgb levels and iron stores significantly and is well tolerated in doses up to 500 mg increments in ESA treated patients with cancer chemotherapy- related anemia. IV iron sucrose should be considered in combination with erythropoietic therapy in anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

[Table: see text]

Comparative trial of BBR 2778 (pixantrone) + rituximab vs single agent rituximab in the treatment of relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL)

7578

Background: BBR 2778 is a novel aza-anthracenedione that shows structural similarities to the anthracyclines, demonstrates single agent activity in patients with NHL, and does not exhibit cardiotoxic effects in animal models. This phase III open-label study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of combination rituximab and BBR 2778, with that of single agent rituximab, in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory indolent NHL. Methods: Pts were randomly assigned to receive both rituximab and BBR 2778 (experimental arm), or rituximab alone (control arm). In the experimental arm, pts received 375 mg/m2 rituximab IV on days 1 and 8 of cycles 1 and 2 only, and 90 mg/m2 BBR 2778 IV on days 2 and 8 of cycle 1, and on days 1 and 8 of all subsequent cycles. Pts could receive six 21-day cycles of BBR 2778. In the control arm, pts received 375 mg/m2 rituximab IV on days 1, 8 and 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycle 2 only. Disease response was assessed every other cycle according to International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria for NHL. Toxicities were assessed throughout the study using NCI-CTC criteria. Study was closed early due to poor enrollment. Results: 38 pts (20 experimental, 18 control) were enrolled. Mean age was 66 and 59 years in the experimental and control arm, respectively. Most patients were males and most had ECOG performance status 0 or 1. Efficacy is summarized in the table. Response rate (75 vs 33%) and time to progression (13.2 vs 8.1 months) were better in the BBR 2778 arm. Only pts in the experimental arm had study drug related serious adverse events (2 febrile neutropenia, 1 pneumonia, 1 neutropenia) and adverse events resulting in withdrawal (6 vs 0). Conclusions: Combination of BBR 2778 and rituximab is superior to rituximab alone with regard to time to progression and overall response rate. BBR 2778 combined with rituximab appeared to be a generally well tolerated regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent NHL.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in Breast Cancer: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Darbepoetin Alfa 200 μg Every 2 Weeks Versus Epoetin Alfa 40,000 U Weekly

BACKGROUND

Current chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer result in high incidences of anemia, which can be treated with erythropoietic agents. The relative efficacy of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa was explored in this phase II, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial in anemic patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive darbepoetin alfa 200 microg every 2 weeks (n = 72) or epoetin alfa 40,000 U weekly (n = 69) for < or = 16 weeks. Clinical and hematologic endpoints and validation of a novel patient satisfaction questionnaire for anemia treatment were evaluated for all patients randomized to receive > or = 1 dose of study drug.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups. Mean changes in hemoglobin (Hb) level from baseline were similar at 1.9 g/dL for darbepoetin alfa and 1.7 g/dL for epoetin alfa. Hematopoietic responses (> or = 2 g/dL increase in Hb level from baseline or Hb level > or = 12 g/dL) were also similar between groups (88% for darbepoetin alfa and 81% for epoetin alfa). The proportions of patients who received a transfusion during treatment were 6% (95% CI, 0-11%) for darbepoetin alfa and 16% (95% CI, 7%-25%) for epoetin alfa. Most patients (67 patients receiving darbepoetin alfa [93%]; 61 patients receiving epoetin alfa [90%]) exhibited a clinically meaningful target Hb level > or = 11 g/dL. No differences in safety were observed.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that, in patients with breast cancer, darbepoetin alfa 200 microg every 2 weeks and epoetin alfa 40,000 U weekly result in comparable clinical outcomes for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia.