What percentage of patients switch from Invisalign to braces? A retrospective study evaluating the conversion rate, number of refinement scans, and length of treatment

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective clinical study aimed to determine what percentage of patients switched from Invisalign to braces to finish treatment. We also examined the number of refinement scans per treatment and the estimated vs actual length of treatment.

METHODS

Records from 500 patients (average age 33.6 years) that started with Invisalign Full or Invisalign Teen were gathered from 2 orthodontic offices and evaluated. Data was collected from the doctors' consultation notes, treatment notes, and Invisalign Web site databases. There were 2 independent variables: gender (male and female) and age groups (aged <20 years, 20-30 years, and >30 years).

RESULTS

One in every 6 patients (17.2%) switched from Invisalign to braces. Invisalign treatment required an average of 2.5 refinement scans, and only 6.0% of patients could complete their treatment without a single refinement scan. The average length of Invisalign treatment was 22.8 months, this was 5.1 months more than the estimated length. The average number of aligners was 64.1, but for the patients that switched to braces, the average number of aligners was 80.6 plus an additional 6.9 months of braces. There was no statistical difference between gender or age group and the conversion to braces. However, patients in the oldest age group had a significantly greater number of refinement scans.

CONCLUSIONS

We are likely overestimating an office's efficiency using Invisalign. On average, an Invisalign patient will require approximately 2-3 refinement scans and 2 years of treatment, and there should be a reasonable expectation that braces may be needed.

Effect of clear aligner wear protocol on the efficacy of tooth movement

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of orthodontic tooth movement with three aligner wear protocols: 7 day, 10 day, and 14 day.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty patients were randomly allocated into three groups: group A (7-day changes), group B (10-day changes), and group C (14-day changes). The posttreatment scans were compared with the final virtual treatment simulations through digital superimposition. The differences between predicted and actual achieved treatment outcomes were computed in six angular and six linear dimensions. Differences >0.5 mm for linear measurements and >2° for angular measurements were considered clinically relevant.

RESULTS

Within groups, and irrespective of wear protocol, all linear discrepancies in both jaws were deemed clinically insignificant (<0.5 mm) while nearly all angular discrepancies were considered clinically significant (>2.0°). When the three groups were compared, group C (14-day changes) showed significantly greater accuracy in the posterior segment for maxillary intrusion, distal-crown tip and buccal-crown torque, and mandibular intrusion and extrusion. The mean treatment duration in the 7-day aligner change group was nearly half that of the 14-day aligner change group (5 months vs 9 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Fourteen-day changes were statistically significantly more accurate in some posterior movements. However, this difference in accuracy did not exceed the threshold for clinical significance (>0.5 mm/>2.0°). Achieving a clinically similar accuracy between the 7-day protocol and 14-day protocol in half the treatment time suggests a 7-day protocol as an acceptable treatment protocol. Clinicians may consider slowing down to a 14-day protocol if challenging posterior movements are desired.