Abstract PS5-02: Assessment of early ctDNA dynamics to predict efficacy of targeted therapies in metastatic breast cancer: Results from plasmaMATCH trial

Background: Early changes in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) levels may identify which patients respond to therapy earlier than imaging, with ctDNA levels falling rapidly in patients who respond to therapy. The plasmaMATCH trial assessed the utility of ctDNA testing with an error-corrected 73-gene targeted panel (Guardant360, Guardant Health) to allocate patients to four mutation matched therapy cohorts. ESR1-extended fulvestrant (A), HER2-neratinib +/- fulvestrant (B), AKT1-capivasertib + fulvestrant (C), AKT basket-capivasertib (D). Here, we report paired baseline and early on treatment ctDNA analysis from plasmaMATCH, to establish the optimal criteria for predicting progression free survival (PFS). Methods: In plasmaMATCH treatment cohorts, plasma samples were collected for ctDNA analysis pre-treatment at cycle 1-day 1 (C1D1) and cycle 2-day 1 (C2D1) timepoints, and sequenced with the Guardant 360 assay. Patients were included if they had a minimum of 14 days of treatment in the first cycle. Multiple different methods were investigated to integrate variant allele fractions (VAF) of mutations identified at each timepoint to estimate the level of ctDNA, including maximum VAF, mean VAF and weighted mean VAF, and weighted mean VAF of clonal mutations at C1D1. Variants with a VAF <0.3%, set as the limit of detection, in C1D1 were excluded. Genes frequently mutated in CHIP were excluded (GNAS, JAK2, IDH1, IDH2 and ATM) from the weighted mean VAF of clonal mutations method. The circulating DNA ratio (CDR) was calculated as the ratio of C2D1 level relative to C1D1 level. The optimal cut-point for predicting PFS was assessed by fitting a range of cutpoints for each VAF integration method, identifying the cut-point with the highest Harrell’s C-index. Results: A total of 142 patients were enrolled into plasmaMATCH cohorts A-D, 79 patients had samples sent for paired C1D1-C2D1 plasma ctDNA sequencing, 1 failed sequencing and 1 insufficient treatment, and 77 (54%) patients had assessable C1D1-C2D1 plasma ctDNA sequencing results (45 cohort A, 12 cohort B, 12 cohort C, 8 cohort D). A weighted mean of clonal mutations in C1D1 ctDNA sequencing was the optimal method for integrating VAF, with peak C-Index 0.67. At the optimal C-index cutoff of 0.132, median PFS with high ctDNA CDR was 2.4 months (95% CI 2.0-3.7) and with suppressed ctDNA CDR was 9.9 months (95% CI 7.0-13.7) (HR 4.3, 95% CI 2.4-7.6, p<0.0001). Early changes in ctDNA level were also predictive in cohorts A extended dose fulvestrant alone (HR 5.8, 95% CI 2.2-16, p=0.0001) and cohorts B-D of targeted therapy (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.7-8.6, p=0.00063). In analysis that was not pre-planned, patients with undetectable ctDNA at C2D1 had a particularly good outcome (p<0.0001, table 1). Conclusions: We identify an optimal methodology for assessing early dynamic changes in ctDNA that predicts treatment efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. This methodology will require validation in independent data-sets, and if validated would allow trials of adapting therapy on the basis of early ctDNA dynamics.

Table 1ctDNA dynamics categoryMedian PFS months (95%CI)6-month PFSORRUndetectable (N=11) CDR=018.2 (10.2-NA)91%9/11 (82%)Suppressed (N=14) CDR <0.132 and >05.4 (4.6-NA)48%6/14 (43%)High (N=52) CDR >=0.1322.4 (2.0-3.7)8%4/52 (8%)

Citation Format: Javier Pascual, Rosalind J Cutts, Belinda Kingston, Sarah Hrebien, Lucy S Kilburn, Sarah Kernaghan, Laura Moretti, Katie Wilkinson, Andrew M Wardley, Iain R Macpherson, Richard D Baird, Rebecca Roylance, Michael Hubank, Giselle Walsh, Iris Faull, Kimberly C Banks, Richard B Lanman, Isaac Garcia-Murillas, Judith M Bliss, Alistair Ring, Nicholas C Turner. Assessment of early ctDNA dynamics to predict efficacy of targeted therapies in metastatic breast cancer: Results from plasmaMATCH trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-02.

Triplet Therapy with Palbociclib, Taselisib, and Fulvestrant in PIK3CA-Mutant Breast Cancer and Doublet Palbociclib and Taselisib in Pathway-Mutant Solid Cancers

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) and PI3K inhibitors synergize in PIK3CA-mutant ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer models. We conducted a phase Ib trial investigating the safety and efficacy of doublet CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib plus selective PI3K inhibitor taselisib in advanced solid tumors, and triplet palbociclib plus taselisib plus fulvestrant in 25 patients with PIK3CA-mutant, ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. The triplet therapy response rate in PIK3CA-mutant, ER-positive HER2-negative cancer was 37.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.8-59.4]. Durable disease control was observed in PIK3CA-mutant ER-negative breast cancer and other solid tumors with doublet therapy. Both combinations were well tolerated at pharmacodynamically active doses. In the triplet group, high baseline cyclin E1 expression associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 4.2; 95% CI, 1.3-13.1; P = 0.02). Early circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics demonstrated high on-treatment ctDNA association with shorter PFS (HR = 5.2; 95% CI, 1.4-19.4; P = 0.04). Longitudinal plasma ctDNA sequencing provided genomic evolution evidence during triplet therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: The triplet of palbociclib, taselisib, and fulvestrant has promising efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated PIK3CA-mutant ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. A subset of patients with PIK3CA-mutant triple-negative breast cancer derived clinical benefit from palbociclib and taselisib doublet, suggesting a potential nonchemotherapy targeted approach for this population.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1.

Triplet Therapy with Palbociclib, Taselisib, and Fulvestrant in PIK3CA-Mutant Breast Cancer and Doublet Palbociclib and Taselisib in Pathway-Mutant Solid Cancers

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) and PI3K inhibitors synergize in PIK3CA-mutant ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer models. We conducted a phase Ib trial investigating the safety and efficacy of doublet CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib plus selective PI3K inhibitor taselisib in advanced solid tumors, and triplet palbociclib plus taselisib plus fulvestrant in 25 patients with PIK3CA-mutant, ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. The triplet therapy response rate in PIK3CA-mutant, ER-positive HER2-negative cancer was 37.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.8-59.4]. Durable disease control was observed in PIK3CA-mutant ER-negative breast cancer and other solid tumors with doublet therapy. Both combinations were well tolerated at pharmacodynamically active doses. In the triplet group, high baseline cyclin E1 expression associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 4.2; 95% CI, 1.3-13.1; P = 0.02). Early circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics demonstrated high on-treatment ctDNA association with shorter PFS (HR = 5.2; 95% CI, 1.4-19.4; P = 0.04). Longitudinal plasma ctDNA sequencing provided genomic evolution evidence during triplet therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: The triplet of palbociclib, taselisib, and fulvestrant has promising efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated PIK3CA-mutant ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. A subset of patients with PIK3CA-mutant triple-negative breast cancer derived clinical benefit from palbociclib and taselisib doublet, suggesting a potential nonchemotherapy targeted approach for this population.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1.

PIK3CA mutation enrichment and quantitation from blood and tissue

PIK3CA is one of the two most frequently mutated genes in breast cancers, occurring in 30–40% of cases. Four frequent ‘hotspot’ PIK3CA mutations (E542K, E545K, H1047R and H1047L) account for 80–90% of all PIK3CA mutations in human malignancies and represent predictive biomarkers. Here we describe a PIK3CA mutation specific nuclease-based enrichment assay, which combined with a low-cost real-time qPCR detection method, enhances assay detection sensitivity from 5% for E542K and 10% for E545K to 0.6%, and from 5% for H1047R to 0.3%. Moreover, we present a novel flexible prediction method to calculate initial mutant allele frequency in tissue biopsy and blood samples with low mutant fraction. These advancements demonstrated a quick, accurate and simple detection and quantitation of PIK3CA mutations in two breast cancer cohorts (first cohort n = 22, second cohort n = 25). Hence this simple, versatile and informative workflow could be applicable for routine diagnostic testing where quantitative results are essential, e.g. disease monitoring subject to validation in a substantial future study.

Phase I Trial of the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib and AKT Inhibitor Capivasertib in Patients with BRCA1/2- and Non-BRCA1/2-Mutant Cancers

Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergy between PARP and PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2)-deficient and BRCA1/2-proficient tumors. We conducted an investigator-initiated phase I trial utilizing a prospective intrapatient dose- escalation design to assess two schedules of capivasertib (AKT inhibitor) with olaparib (PARP inhibitor) in 64 patients with advanced solid tumors. Dose expansions enrolled germline BRCA1/2-mutant tumors, or BRCA1/2 wild-type cancers harboring somatic DNA damage response (DDR) or PI3K-AKT pathway alterations. The combination was well tolerated. Recommended phase II doses for the two schedules were: olaparib 300 mg twice a day with either capivasertib 400 mg twice a day 4 days on, 3 days off, or capivasertib 640 mg twice a day 2 days on, 5 days off. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional. Pharmacodynamic studies confirmed phosphorylated (p) GSK3β suppression, increased pERK, and decreased BRCA1 expression. Twenty-five (44.6%) of 56 evaluable patients achieved clinical benefit (RECIST complete response/partial response or stable disease ≥ 4 months), including patients with tumors harboring germline BRCA1/2 mutations and BRCA1/2 wild-type cancers with or without DDR and PI3K-AKT pathway alterations. SIGNIFICANCE: In the first trial to combine PARP and AKT inhibitors, a prospective intrapatient dose- escalation design demonstrated safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic activity and assessed predictive biomarkers of response/resistance. Antitumor activity was observed in patients harboring tumors with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and BRCA1/2 wild-type cancers with or without somatic DDR and/or PI3K-AKT pathway alterations.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1426.

ESR1 Mutations and Overall Survival on Fulvestrant versus Exemestane in Advanced Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Combined Analysis of the Phase III SoFEA and EFECT Trials

PURPOSE

ESR1 mutations are acquired frequently in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer after prior aromatase inhibitors. We assessed the clinical utility of baseline ESR1 circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis in the two phase III randomized trials of fulvestrant versus exemestane.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The phase III EFECT and SoFEA trials randomized patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer who had progressed on prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy, between fulvestrant 250 mg and exemestane. Baseline serum samples from 227 patients in EFECT, and baseline plasma from 161 patients in SoFEA, were analyzed for ESR1 mutations by digital PCR. The primary objectives were to assess the impact of ESR1 mutation status on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a combined analysis of both studies.

RESULTS

ESR1 mutations were detected in 30% (151/383) baseline samples. In patients with ESR1 mutation detected, PFS was 2.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.0-2.6] on exemestane and 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.0-6.0) on fulvestrant [hazard ratio (HR), 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.89; P = 0.01). In patients without ESR1 mutations detected, PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.7-6.2) on exemestane and 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-5.5) on fulvestrant (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.81-1.37; P = 0.69). There was an interaction between ESR1 mutation and treatment (P = 0.02). Patients with ESR1 mutation detected had 1-year OS of 62% (95% CI, 45%-75%) on exemestane and 80% (95% CI, 68%-87%) on fulvestrant (P = 0.04; restricted mean survival analysis). Patients without ESR1 mutations detected had 1-year OS of 79% (95% CI, 71%-85%) on exemestane and 81% (95% CI, 74%-87%) on fulvestrant (P = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of ESR1 mutations in baseline ctDNA is associated with inferior PFS and OS in patients treated with exemestane versus fulvestrant.

Circulating tumour DNA analysis to direct therapy in advanced breast cancer (plasmaMATCH): a multicentre, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing might provide a current assessment of the genomic profile of advanced cancer, without the need to repeat tumour biopsy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of ctDNA testing in advanced breast cancer and the ability of ctDNA testing to select patients for mutation-directed therapy.

METHODS

We did an open-label, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial of ctDNA testing in 18 UK hospitals. Participants were women (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2. Patients had completed at least one previous line of treatment for advanced breast cancer or relapsed within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were recruited into four parallel treatment cohorts matched to mutations identified in ctDNA: cohort A comprised patients with ESR1 mutations (treated with intramuscular extended-dose fulvestrant 500 mg); cohort B comprised patients with HER2 mutations (treated with oral neratinib 240 mg, and if oestrogen receptor-positive with intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); cohort C comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-positive cancer (treated with oral capivasertib 400 mg plus intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); and cohort D comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-negative cancer or PTEN mutation (treated with oral capivasertib 480 mg). Each cohort had a primary endpoint of confirmed objective response rate. For cohort A, 13 or more responses among 78 evaluable patients were required to infer activity and three or more among 16 were required for cohorts B, C, and D. Recruitment to all cohorts is complete and long-term follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03182634; the European Clinical Trials database, EudraCT2015-003735-36; and the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN16945804.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 21, 2016, and April 26, 2019, 1051 patients registered for the study, with ctDNA results available for 1034 patients. Agreement between ctDNA digital PCR and targeted sequencing was 96-99% (n=800, kappa 0·89-0·93). Sensitivity of digital PCR ctDNA testing for mutations identified in tissue sequencing was 93% (95% CI 83-98) overall and 98% (87-100) with contemporaneous biopsies. In all cohorts, combined median follow-up was 14·4 months (IQR 7·0-23·7). Cohorts B and C met or exceeded the target number of responses, with five (25% [95% CI 9-49]) of 20 patients in cohort B and four (22% [6-48]) of 18 patients in cohort C having a response. Cohorts A and D did not reach the target number of responses, with six (8% [95% CI 3-17]) of 74 in cohort A and two (11% [1-33]) of 19 patients in cohort D having a response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were raised gamma-glutamyltransferase (13 [16%] of 80 patients; cohort A); diarrhoea (four [25%] of 20; cohort B); fatigue (four [22%] of 18; cohort C); and rash (five [26%] of 19; cohort D). 17 serious adverse reactions occurred in 11 patients, and there was one treatment-related death caused by grade 4 dyspnoea (in cohort C).

INTERPRETATION

ctDNA testing offers accurate, rapid genotyping that enables the selection of mutation-directed therapies for patients with breast cancer, with sufficient clinical validity for adoption into routine clinical practice. Our results demonstrate clinically relevant activity of targeted therapies against rare HER2 and AKT1 mutations, confirming these mutations could be targetable for breast cancer treatment.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, and Puma Biotechnology.

Treatment effect of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy by prognostic and intrinsic subtype and biomarker analysis in patients with bone-only disease: a joint analysis of PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 clinical trials

Purpose

This analysis evaluated the relationship between treatment-free interval (TFI, in PALOMA-2)/disease-free interval (DFI, in PALOMA-3) and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS, in PALOMA-3), treatment effect in patients with bone-only disease, and whether intrinsic subtype affects PFS in patients receiving palbociclib.

Methods

Data were from phase 3, randomized PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 clinical studies of hormone receptor‒positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‒negative (HR+ /HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients receiving endocrine therapy plus palbociclib or placebo. Subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) analysis evaluated the association between DFI and PFS and OS. PFS by luminal subtype and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 or endocrine pathway gene expression levels were evaluated in patients with bone-only disease; median PFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

Median durations of TFI were 37.1 and 30.9 months (PALOMA-2) and DFI were 49.2 and 52.0 months (PALOMA-3) in the palbociclib and placebo groups, respectively. Among the PALOMA-2 biomarker population (n = 454), 23% had bone-only disease; median PFS was longer with palbociclib versus placebo (31.3 vs 11.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI 0.25‒0.69). The interaction effect of bone-only versus visceral disease subgroups on median PFS with palbociclib was not significant (P = 0.262). Among the PALOMA-3 biomarker population (n = 302), 27% had bone-only disease. STEPP analyses showed that palbociclib PFS benefit was not affected by DFI, and that palbociclib OS effect may be smaller in patients with short DFIs. Among patients who provided metastatic tumor tissues (n = 142), regardless of luminal A (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI 0.11‒0.47; P = 0.0000158) or luminal B (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI 0.12‒0.56; P = 0.000269) subtype, palbociclib improved PFS versus placebo.

Conclusions

These findings support palbociclib plus endocrine therapy as standard of care for HR+ /HER2− ABC patients, regardless of baseline TFI/DFI or intrinsic molecular subtype, including patients with bone-only disease.

Trial registration

Pfizer (clinicaltrials.gov:NCT01740427, NCT01942135).

Genetic Alterations in the PI3K/AKT Pathway and Baseline AKT Activity Define AKT Inhibitor Sensitivity in Breast Cancer Patient-derived Xenografts

PURPOSE

AZD5363/capivasertib is a pan-AKT catalytic inhibitor with promising activity in combination with paclitaxel in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer harboring PI3K/AKT-pathway alterations and in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in combination with fulvestrant. Here, we aimed to identify response biomarkers and uncover mechanisms of resistance to AZD5363 and its combination with paclitaxel.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Genetic and proteomic markers were analyzed in 28 HER2-negative patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and in patient samples, and correlated to AZD5363 sensitivity as single agent and in combination with paclitaxel.

RESULTS

Four PDX were derived from patients receiving AZD5363 in the clinic which exhibited concordant treatment response. Mutations in PIK3CA/AKT1 and absence of mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1)-activating alterations, for example, in MTOR or TSC1, were associated with sensitivity to AZD5363 monotherapy. Interestingly, excluding PTEN from the composite biomarker increased its accuracy from 64% to 89%. Moreover, resistant PDXs exhibited low baseline pAKT S473 and residual pS6 S235 upon treatment, suggesting that parallel pathways bypass AKT/S6K1 signaling in these models. We identified two mechanisms of acquired resistance to AZD5363: cyclin D1 overexpression and loss of AKT1 p.E17K.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insight into putative predictive biomarkers of response and acquired resistance to AZD5363 in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Homologous recombination DNA repair deficiency and PARP inhibition activity in primary triple negative breast cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) encompasses molecularly different subgroups, with a subgroup harboring evidence of defective homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. Here, within a phase 2 window clinical trial, RIO trial (EudraCT 2014-003319-12), we investigate the activity of PARP inhibitors in 43 patients with untreated TNBC. The primary end point, decreased Ki67, occured in 12% of TNBC. In secondary end point analyses, HR deficiency was identified in 69% of TNBC with the mutational-signature-based HRDetect assay. Cancers with HRDetect mutational signatures of HR deficiency had a functional defect in HR, assessed by impaired RAD51 foci formation on end of treatment biopsy. Following rucaparib treatment there was no association of Ki67 change with HR deficiency. In contrast, early circulating tumor DNA dynamics identified activity of rucaparib, with end of treatment ctDNA levels suppressed by rucaparib in mutation-signature HR-deficient cancers. In ad hoc analysis, rucaparib induced expression of interferon response genes in HR-deficient cancers. The majority of TNBCs have a defect in DNA repair, identifiable by mutational signature analysis, that may be targetable with PARP inhibitors.

Prognostic and predictive value of ESR1 mutations in postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) resistant to aromatase inhibitors (AI), treated with palbociclib (PAL) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) or capecitabine (CAP) in the PEARL study

1022

Background: Prior retrospective data has shown ESR1 mutation is an acquired resistant mechanism to AI. However, little is known about ist prognostic and predictive value to endocrine-based therapy and chemotherapy. PEARL study compared PAL+ET vs CAP in AI resistant patients. Here we wxplored prospectively the ESR1 mutational status based on updated PFS and OS. Methods: PEARL is a phase 3 study with 2 subsequent cohorts: cohort 1 with 296 pts randomized to PAL+Exemestane (EXE) vs CAP and cohort 2 with 305 pts randomized to PAL+ Fulvestran (FUL) vs CAP. ESR1 hotspot mutations were analyzed in circulating free DNA at baseline by digital PCR. Cox regresion analysis for PFS and OS were performed. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and interaction test between treatment and ESR1 status were calculated. Results: ESR1 mutational status was assessed in 557 pts, 91% and 94% treated with CAP and PAL+ET, respectively; 164 (29%) had ESR1 mutations. Characteristics between ESR1 wild-type (WT) and mutated pts were balanced except for ECOG, prior sensitivity to ET, treatment line, prior AI for metastatic disease and time from first metastatic diagnosis to randomization. Median follow-up was 22.5 months (m). Median PFS was 9.6 vs. 7.5 m (HR: 1.06 [0.88 - 1.28], p = 0.522) and median OS was 30.2 vs 30.3 (HR: 0.99 [0.78 - 1.26] p = 0.934), for CAP vs. PAL+ET, respectively. No interaction was seen between treatment arm and ESR1 status either for PFS (p = 0.538) or OS (p = 0.957). Conclusions: In luminal MBC, ESR1-mutated pts had poorer OS than ESR1-WT pts regardless of treatment received. Clinical trial information: NCT02028507 . [Table: see text]

Alpelisib (ALP) + fulvestrant (FUL) in patients (pts) with PIK3CA-mutated (mut) hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) previously treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) + aromatase inhibitor (AI): BYLieve study results

1006

Background: PIK3CA mutations (mut) occur in ~40% of pts with HR+, HER2– ABC and are associated with poor prognosis and resistance to treatment (tx). ALP, a PI3Kα inhibitor, plus FUL demonstrated efficacy in the phase 3 SOLAR-1 trial of HR+, HER2– PIK3CA-mut ABC. Little clinical data and few prospective studies are available to inform tx decisions for pts with HR+, HER2– PIK3CA-mut ABC in the post-CDKi setting. BYLieve is the first trial evaluating ALP + endocrine therapy (ET; FUL or letrozole) in pts with HR+, HER2– PIK3CA-mut ABC who progressed on/after prior therapy, including CDKi. In this ongoing phase 2, open-label, noncomparative study, 112 pts with centrally confirmed PIK3CA mut in tumor tissue are enrolled in each cohort per immediate prior tx of CDKi + AI, CDKi + FUL, or systemic chemo or ET. Enrollment is complete in prior CDKi + AI and CDKi + FUL cohorts and ongoing in prior systemic chemo or ET cohort. We report on the cohort of pts with CDKi + AI as immediate prior tx. Methods: Pts received ALP 300 mg/day + FUL 500 mg Q28D + C1D15. Primary endpoint was proportion of pts alive without disease progression at 6 mo per local assessment; 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Clopper and Pearson (1934) exact method. Evidence of clinically meaningful tx effect was defined as the lower bound of the 95% CI > 30%. Safety was assessed in all patients; AEs presented by preferred term. Results: 127 pts whose immediate prior tx was CDKi + AI were enrolled, of whom 121 had centrally confirmed PIK3CA mut; median follow-up was 11.7 mo. Primary endpoint was met: proportion of pts without disease progression at 6 mo was 50.4% (95% CI, 41.2-59.6). Most frequent all-grade AEs were diarrhea (60%), hyperglycemia (58%), nausea (46%), fatigue (29%), decreased appetite (28%), and rash (28%). Most frequent grade ≥3 AEs included hyperglycemia (28%), rash (9%), and rash maculopapular (9%). Incidence of AEs leading to discontinuation was low; most frequent AEs leading to discontinuation were rash (5 pts, 3.9%), colitis, hyperglycemia, urticaria, and vomiting (2 pts, 1.6% each). Conclusions: With follow-up still ongoing, BYLieve shows in a large number of pts that ALP + FUL demonstrates clinically meaningful efficacy and manageable toxicity post CDKi tx. Building on findings from SOLAR-1, BYLieve further supports use of ALP + FUL for HR+, HER2– PIK3CA-mut ABC. Clinical trial information: NCT03056755 .

A phase Ib study to evaluate the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader GDC-9545 alone or combined with palbociclib in metastatic ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer

1023

Background: GDC-9545 is a potent, orally available, selective estrogen receptor degrader developed for the treatment of ER-positive (ER+) breast cancer alone or combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors. A first-in-human study evaluated 10-250 mg GDC-9545; tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and clinical results support expansion cohorts at ≥30 mg (Jhaveri et al., 2019). Methods: This study evaluated PK, PD, and efficacy of GDC-9545 alone and combined with palbociclib, ± LHRH agonist. Eligible patients (pts) had ER+ (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with ≤ 2 prior therapies in the advanced or metastatic setting. No prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitor was allowed in pts receiving palbociclib. Results: Eight-five pts were enrolled in 2 cohorts: GDC-9545 100 mg given once daily ± LHRH agonist (Cohort A), and GDC-9545 100 mg +125 mg palbociclib on a 21 day on/7 day off schedule ± LHRH agonist (Cohort B). Of the 39 pts in Cohort A, adverse events (AE) occurring in ≥10% of pts were fatigue, cough, back pain, pain in extremity, and arthralgia. Related AEs were generally Grade (G) 1-2; there were 3 related G3 AEs of fatigue, transaminase increased, and diarrhea. Two pts had GDC-9545 reduced, one due to G3 diarrhea and another due to G3 transaminitis. Of the 46 pts in Cohort B, AEs in ≥10% of pts were neutropenia, fatigue, bradycardia, diarrhea, constipation, dizziness, nausea, anemia, asthenia, thrombocytopenia, pruritus, and visual impairment. Twenty-six (57%) pts had G≥3 AEs. G≥3 neutropenia was reported in 23 (50%) pts. One pt had palbociclib reduced due to G3 febrile neutropenia. Eleven (13%) of 85 pts had G1 asymptomatic bradycardia considered related to GDC-9545. No pts in either cohort discontinued study treatment due to AEs. PK analysis and clinical data demonstrate no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions between GDC-9545 and palbociclib. Reduced ER, PR, and Ki67 levels, and an ER activity signature, were observed in paired pre- and on-treatment biopsies (n = 12). Eighteen of 33 pts in Cohort A had either confirmed partial responses or were on study 24 weeks (clinical benefit rate 55%). Clinical benefit was observed in pts with prior fulvestrant treatment and with detectable ESR1 mutations at enrollment. Clinical benefit data for both cohorts are anticipated to be mature in April 2020. Conclusions: GDC-9545 was well-tolerated as a single agent and in combination with palbociclib with encouraging PK, PD, and anti-tumor activity in ER+ MBC to support Phase III development. Clinical trial information: NCT03332797 .

Next Generation Sequencing Assay for Detection of Circulating HPV DNA (cHPV-DNA) in Patients Undergoing Radical (Chemo)Radiotherapy in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ASCC)

Background: Following chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) for human papilloma virus positive (HPV+) anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), detection of residual/recurrent disease is challenging. Patients frequently undergo unnecessary repeated biopsies for abnormal MRI/clinical findings. In a pilot study we assessed the role of circulating HPV-DNA in identifying "true" residual disease. Methods: We prospectively collected plasma samples at baseline (n = 21) and 12 weeks post-CRT (n = 17). Circulating HPV-DNA (cHPV DNA) was measured using a novel next generation sequencing (NGS) assay, panHPV-detect, comprising of two primer pools covering distinct regions of eight high-risk HPV genomes (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52, and 58) to detect circulating HPV-DNA (cHPV DNA). cHPV-DNA levels post-CRT were correlated to disease response. Results: In pre-CRT samples, panHPV-detect demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity for HPV associated ASCC. PanHPV-detect was able to demonstrate cHPV-DNA in 100% (9/9) patients with T1/T2N0 cancers. cHPV-DNA was detectable 12 weeks post CRT in just 2/17 patients, both of whom relapsed. 1/16 patients who had a clinical complete response (CR) at 3 months post-CRT but relapsed at 9 months and 1/1 patient with a partial response (PR). PanHPV-detect demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity in predicting response to CRT. Conclusion: We demonstrate that panHPV-detect, an NSG assay is a highly sensitive and specific test for the identification of cHPV-DNA in plasma at diagnosis. cHPV-DNA post-treatment may predict clinical response to CRT.

Genomic alterations in breast cancer: level of evidence for actionability according to ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT)

Better knowledge of the tumor genomic landscapes has helped to develop more effective targeted drugs. However, there is no tool to interpret targetability of genomic alterations assessed by next-generation sequencing in the context of clinical practice. Our aim is to rank the level of evidence of individual recurrent genomic alterations observed in breast cancer based on the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) in order to help the clinicians to prioritize treatment. Analyses of databases suggested that there are around 40 recurrent driver alterations in breast cancer. ERBB2 amplification, germline BRCA1/2 mutations, PIK3CA mutations were classified tier of evidence IA based on large randomized trials showing antitumor activity of targeted therapies in patients presenting the alterations. NTRK fusions and microsatellite instability (MSI) were ranked IC. ESR1 mutations and PTEN loss were ranked tier IIA, and ERBB2 mutations and AKT1 mutations tier IIB. Somatic BRCA 1/2 mutations, MDM2 amplifications and ERBB 3 mutations were ranked tier III. Seventeen genes were ranked tier IV based on preclinical evidence. Finally, FGFR1 and CCND1 were ranked tier X alterations because previous studies have shown lack of actionability.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: past, present, and future

The development and approval of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer represents a major milestone in cancer therapeutics. Three different oral CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, have significantly improved progression-free survival by a number of months when combined with endocrine therapy. More recently, improvement in overall survival has been reported with ribociclib and abemaciclib. The toxicity profile of all three drugs is well described and generally easily manageable with dose reductions when indicated. More myelotoxicity is observed with palbociclib and ribociclib, but more gastrointestinal toxicity is observed with abemaciclib. Emerging data is shedding light on the resistance mechanisms associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, including cell cycle alterations and activation of upstream tyrosine kinase receptors. A number of clinical trials are exploring several important questions regarding treatment sequencing, combinatorial strategies, and the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, thereby further expanding and refining the clinical application of CDK4/6 inhibitors for patients with breast cancer.

Abstract P1-19-16: Long-term pooled safety analysis of palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer: An updated analysis

Background Palbociclib (PAL) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) was shown to be tolerable in a previous pooled analysis of the 3 PALOMA clinical trials. This new pooled, post hoc analysis examines the safety profile of PAL + ET using data from more recent data cutoff dates with longer drug exposure. Methods Data were pooled from 3 randomized phase 2 and 3 studies of patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer (HR+/HER2- ABC). Postmenopausal first-line patients were randomized to receive letrozole (2.5 mg/d, continuously) +/- PAL (125 mg/d, 3/1 schedule) in PALOMA-1 or letrozole (2.5 mg/d, continuously) + PAL (125 mg/d, 3/1 schedule)/placebo in PALOMA-2. In PALOMA-3, pre/peri- and postmenopausal patients with prior endocrine resistance received intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg every 14 days for the first 3 injections, then every 28 days) + PAL (125 mg/d, 3/1 schedule)/placebo. The cumulative rates of adverse events (AEs) were assessed over time. Results Updated data cutoff dates used for this analysis were December 21, 2017 (PALOMA-1), May 31, 2017 (PALOMA-2), and April 13, 2018 (PALOMA-3). The total number of person-years of exposure was 1950 (1422 PAL + ET, 528 ET). In the ET arm (n=471), 20.2% of patients were treated for ≥24 months and 10.2% were treated for ≥36 months. In the PAL + ET arm (n=872), 36% of patients were treated for ≥24 months and 22.4% for ≥36 months. The majority of patients treated for ≥24 and ≥36 months in the PAL + ET arm were from PALOMA-2. As expected, neutropenia and infections (any grade) were more frequent with PAL + ET (82.1% and 59.2%, respectively) than in the ET arm (5.1% and 39.5%). Febrile neutropenia was reported in 1.4% of patients in the PAL + ET arm. The incidence of hematologic AEs in the PAL + ET arm peaked during the first year of treatment and then plateaued over the subsequent 5 years. Serious AEs were reported in 22.8% of patients in the PAL + ET arm and 15.5% in the ET arm. Selected cumulative grade 3/4 event rates through 5 years were neutropenia (68.3% in PAL + ET; 0.8% in ET), leukopenia (29.9%; 0.2%), infections (6.4%; 2.8%), anemia (5.3%; 2.1%), fatigue (2.9%; 1.3%), alanine aminotransferase increased (2.2%; 0.2%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (2.9%; 1.3%), diarrhea (1%; 1.1%), nausea (0.6%; 1.3%), vomiting (0.7%; 1.1%), and QTc prolongation (0.3%; 0.2%). After adjusting for treatment exposure, incidence rates of venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism were 0.0225 (PAL + ET) and 0.0246 (ET) per person-year and 0.0127 (PAL + ET) and 0.0132 (ET) per person-year, respectively. Conclusion This 5-year, long-term safety analysis of PAL + ET showed a consistent profile with no new safety signals, and no cumulative/delayed toxicities. PAL + ET remains a safe and manageable treatment for patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. Pfizer (NCT00721409, NCT01740427, NCT01942135)

Citation Format: Richard S Finn, Hope S Rugo, Karen Gelmon, Massimo Cristofanilli, Marco Colleoni, Sherene Loi, Patrick Schnell, Dongrui R Lu, Kathy P Theall, Ave Mori, Eric Gauthier, Eustratios Bananis, Nicholas C Turner, Véronique Diéras. Long-term pooled safety analysis of palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer: An updated analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-16.

Capivasertib Plus Paclitaxel Versus Placebo Plus Paclitaxel As First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The PAKT Trial

PURPOSE

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathway is frequently activated in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The AKT inhibitor capivasertib has shown preclinical activity in TNBC models, and drug sensitivity has been associated with activation of PI3K or AKT and/or deletions of PTEN. The PAKT trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding capivasertib to paclitaxel as first-line therapy for TNBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial recruited women with untreated metastatic TNBC. A total of 140 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to paclitaxel 90 mg/m² (days 1, 8, 15) with either capivasertib (400 mg twice daily) or placebo (days 2-5, 9-12, 16-19) every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), PFS and OS in the subgroup with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations, tumor response, and safety.

RESULTS

Median PFS was 5.9 months with capivasertib plus paclitaxel and 4.2 months with placebo plus paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.08; 1-sided P = .06 [predefined significance level, 1-sided P = .10]). Median OS was 19.1 months with capivasertib plus paclitaxel and 12.6 months with placebo plus paclitaxel (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.99; 2-sided P = .04). In patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors (n = 28), median PFS was 9.3 months with capivasertib plus paclitaxel and 3.7 months with placebo plus paclitaxel (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.79; 2-sided P = .01). The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events in those treated with capivasertib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel, respectively, were diarrhea (13% v 1%), infection (4% v 1%), neutropenia (3% v 3%), rash (4% v 0%), and fatigue (4% v 0%).

CONCLUSION

Addition of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib to first-line paclitaxel therapy for TNBC resulted in significantly longer PFS and OS. Benefits were more pronounced in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors. Capivasertib warrants further investigation for treatment of TNBC.

Assessment of Molecular Relapse Detection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Importance

Current treatment cures most cases of early-stage, primary breast cancer. However, better techniques are required to identify which patients are at risk of relapse.

Objective

To assess the clinical validity of molecular relapse detection with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis in early-stage breast cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective, multicenter, sample collection, validation study conducted at 5 United Kingdom medical centers from November 24, 2011, to October 18, 2016, assessed patients with early-stage breast cancer irrespective of hormone receptor and ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu) status who were receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery or surgery before adjuvant chemotherapy. The study recruited 170 women, with mutations identified in 101 patients forming the main cohort. Secondary analyses were conducted on a combined cohort of 144 patients, including 43 patients previously analyzed in a proof of principle study.

Interventions

Primary tumor was sequenced to identify somatic mutations, and personalized tumor-specific digital polymerase chain reaction assays were used to monitor these mutations in serial plasma samples taken every 3 months for the first year of follow-up and subsequently every 6 months.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was relapse-free survival analyzed with Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Results

In the main cohort of 101 female patients (mean [SD] age, 54 [11] years) with a median follow-up of 35.5 months (interquartile range, 27.9-43.0 months), detection of ctDNA during follow-up was associated with relapse (hazard ratio, 25.2; 95% CI, 6.7-95.6; P < .001). Detection of ctDNA at diagnosis, before any treatment, was also associated with relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.2-27.1; P = .01). In the combined cohort, ctDNA detection had a median lead time of 10.7 months (95% CI, 8.1-19.1 months) compared with clinical relapse and was associated with relapse in all breast cancer subtypes. Distant extracranial metastatic relapse was detected by ctDNA in 22 of 23 patients (96%). Brain-only metastasis was less commonly detected by ctDNA (1 of 6 patients [17%]), suggesting relapse sites less readily detectable by ctDNA analysis.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings suggest that detection of ctDNA during follow-up is associated with a high risk of future relapse of early-stage breast cancer. Prospective studies are needed to assess the potential of molecular relapse detection to guide adjuvant therapy.

Comparison of BEAMing and Droplet Digital PCR for Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays are increasingly used for clinical decision-making, but it is unknown how well different assays agree. We aimed to assess the agreement in ctDNA mutation calling between BEAMing (beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), 2 of the most commonly used digital PCR techniques for detecting mutations in ctDNA.

METHODS

mutations in ctDNA with both BEAMing and ddPCR. Concordance between the 2 approaches was assessed, with exploratory analyses to estimate the importance of sampling effects.

RESULTS

= 0.019). The majority of discordant calls occurred at allele frequency <1%, predominantly resulting from stochastic sampling effects.

CONCLUSIONS

This large, clinically relevant comparison showed good agreement between BEAMing and ddPCR, suggesting sufficient reproducibility for clinical use. Much of the observed discordancy may be related to sampling effects, potentially explaining many of the differences in the currently available ctDNA literature.

Targeting the PI3-kinase pathway in triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterised by poor outcomes and a historical lack of targeted therapies. Dysregulation of signalling through the phosphoinositide 3 (PI3)-kinase and AKT signalling pathway is one of the most frequent oncogenic aberrations of TNBC. Although mutations in individual genes occur relatively rarely, combined activating mutations in PIK3CA and AKT1, with inactivating mutations in phosphatase and tensin homologue, occur in ∼25%‒30% of advanced TNBC. Recent randomised trials suggest improved progression-free survival (PFS) with AKT-inhibitors in combination with first-line chemotherapy for patients with TNBC and pathway genetic aberrations. We review the evidence for PI3K pathway activation in TNBC, and clinical trial data for PI3K, AKT and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in TNBC. We discuss uncertainty over defining which cancers have pathway activation and the future overlap between immunotherapy and pathway targeting.

PIPA: A phase Ib study of β-isoform sparing phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor taselisib (T) plus palbociclib (P) and fulvestrant (FUL) in PIK3CA-mutant (mt) ER-positive and taselisib (T) plus palbociclib (P) in PIK3CA-mutant (mt) ER-negative advanced breast cancer

1051

Background: PI3K and CDK4/6 inhibitors synergise in ER+ve and –ve PIK3CA-mt breast cancer (BC) models. Escalation phase of this study set recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) at P 125mg on a 3/1 scheme plus T 2mg daily ( Lim, ASCO 2017). Here we present the results of expansion cohorts for PIK3CA-mt BC patients (pts). Methods: The primary objective was to assess the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of the P + T + FUL triplet in pts with measurable PIK3CA-mt ER+ve HER2-ve advanced BC, with up to two prior lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease. PIK3CA mutation was assessed in tissue or plasma DNA analysis. Exploratory objectives included assessment of efficacy of P + T in a cohort of pts with PIK3CA-mt advanced ER-ve BC. Safety is reported overall for 44 patients including an additional cohort of 7 PIK3CA-unknown ER+ve BC pts treated with P + T + letrozole (LET). For the P + T + FUL triplet a Simon minmax design was used, with 6 responses in 25 patients required to declare efficacy. Results: We recruited 24 assessable patients with PIK3CA-mt ER+ve HER2-ve advanced BC, median age 57 (42-74), median 3 (1-9) prior therapy lines for advance disease, with 24 (100%) receiving prior endocrine therapy and 23 (96%) prior aromatase inhibitor. ORR was 33% (8/24, 95% CI 16-55%), with median progression free survival (PFS) 7.9m (95% CI 5.6-11.8). For the 11 assessable PIK3CA-mt ER-ve pts (8 HER2-ve, 3 HER2+ve) receiving P + T, ORR was 0% (0/11), clinical benefit rate (CBR) 27% (3/11) and median PFS 4.3m (95% CI 1.8-6.1). Most common AEs across all cohorts were neutropenia (80%), fatigue (50%), mucositis (50%) and thrombocytopenia (30%). Most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (57%) and rash (11%). Translational research is ongoing. Conclusions: The triplet of P + T + FUL has promising efficacy in pre-treated PIK3CA-mt ER+ve advanced BC. A subset of patients with PIK3CA-mt ER-ve advanced BC had clinical benefit from P + T. The combination of P + T +/- FUL/LET was well tolerated with anticipated AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT02389842.

Alpelisib (ALP) + endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (pts) with PIK3CA-mutated hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor-2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC): First interim BYLieve study results

1040

Background: In the phase 3 SOLAR-1 study, ALP + fulvestrant (FUL) improved PFS in pts with HR+, HER2– ABC with a PIK3CA mutation overall and in the small group of pts with prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) use. We report interim data from the BYLieve study in pts with PIK3CA-mutated ABC and prior CDKi exposure. Methods: BYLieve is an ongoing, phase 2, open-label, non-comparative study of ALP 300 mg QD + ET in men and women with PIK3CA-mutated HR+, HER2– ABC whose disease progressed on/after CDKi + ET. Pts are permitted ≤2 prior anticancer therapies and ≤1 prior chemotherapy regimen for ABC. Pts with prior CDKi and AI ( FUL cohort) receive ALP and FUL 500 mg Q28d + C1d15 IM. Pts with prior CDKi and FUL ( LET cohort) receive ALP and letrozole (LET) 2.5 mg PO QD. In this preplanned interim analysis, conducted after ≥20 pts in FUL had ≥6 mo of follow-up, descriptive data are reported for preliminary safety and efficacy in the FUL and LET cohorts. Results: At data cutoff, 64 and 36 pts were enrolled in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively; 39 pts ( FUL, n = 21; LET, n = 18) have safety and efficacy data with ≥6 mo follow-up and are reported here. Data on 100 pts enrolled at the time of data cutoff will be presented. In the 39 pts with ≥6 mo follow-up, median ALP duration was 5.3 and 5.5 mo in FUL and LET, respectively; median duration of FUL and LET was 5.6 mo. Median relative ALP dose intensity was 93% ( FUL) and 87% ( LET). Most common grade ≥3 adverse events were hyperglycemia (38.1% ( FUL) and 27.8% ( LET)) and rash (4.8% ( FUL) and 27.8% ( LET)). Only 2 pts (5%; 1 pt per cohort) discontinued due to an AE. In pts with centrally confirmed PIK3CA mutation (n = 20 ( FUL); n = 17 ( LET)), ORR was 20% ( FUL) and 18% ( LET), CBR was 40% ( FUL) and 35% ( LET). Efficacy and safety data for the 100 enrolled pts will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Pending further readout of the ongoing BYLieve trial, safety and tolerability of ALP and hormonal therapy in pts with prior CDKi are consistent with those of SOLAR-1; discontinuation due to toxicity was rare. NCT03056755. Clinical trial information: NCT02437318.

Association of drug-related polymorphisms with palbociclib-related neutropenia: Pharmacogenetic analysis of PALOMA-2/-3 (P2/3)

1060

Background: The most common PAL treatment related adverse event is neutropenia. ABCB1 and ERCC1 variants are associated with increased chemotherapy drug exposure and CYP3A7*1C may be associated with reduced exposure. Pharmacogenetic analyses of these variants in patients (pts) from P2/3 may reveal associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and early occurrence of grade 3/4 (G3/4) neutropenia. Methods: ABCB1 (rs1045642, rs1128503), ERCC1 (rs3212986, rs11615), and CYP3A7*1C (rs45446698) variants were analyzed in germline DNA from pts with HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer from P2 (n=584) and P3 (n=442) by TaqMan assay. Association between variants and incidence of G3/4 low absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1D15) was assessed with the exact Cochran-Armitage trend test. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regression. Results: In total, 652 PAL-treated pts had SNP, race, and C1D15 ANC data. Minor allele frequencies (MAF), incidence rates, and relative risk of G3/4 C1D15 ANC for ABCB1 and ERCC1 variants are given in the Table. CYP3A7*1C was only found in non-Asians (MAF 6%). Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive assessment of pharmacogenetic data from P2/3. ABCB1 and ERCC1 SNP allele frequencies differ between Asians and non-Asians. Despite combining P2/3 data, we lacked power to detect moderate associations; further investigation of these SNPs with G3/4 C1D15 ANC is warranted. Pfizer Clinical trial information: NCT01740427, NCT01942135. [Table: see text]

PIPA: A phase Ib study of selective ß-isoform sparing phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor taselisib (T) plus palbociclib (P) in patients (pts) with advanced solid cancers—Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis of the doublet combination

3087

Background: Oncogenic hyperactivation of the PI3K pathway is common in multiple cancers, with preclinical data showing that CDK4/6 inhibitors sensitise PIK3CA mutant cancers to PI3K inhibitors. We report the activity of the P+T in solid tumors with PI3K pathway activation, along with the PD biomarker analysis. Methods: We previously reported the dose escalation phase identifying 125mg P given 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off in combination with T 2mg as the recommended phase 2 dose (R2PD, Lim, ASCO 2017). We report the results in solid tumors with confirmed activating mutations (mts) in the PI3K pathway, from dose escalation and expansion, with no prior exposure to CDK4/6 or PI3K pathway inhibitors. PD studies include analyses of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and paired tumour biopsies. Results: 20 pts (median age 61, range 34-72) were treated at the doublet RP2D, M/F 7/13, with a median 4 prior treatments (range 2-11). Tumour types included colorectal, breast, lung, endometrial,oligodendroglioma and head and neck cancers. Durable disease control occurred in 3 patients with ER+ advanced breast cancer with responses lasting >6 months including 1 pt with a H1047R PIK3CAmt with an ongoing RECIST PR>36 cycles, 2 pts with PIK3CAmt colorectal cancer had RECIST SD for >5 months, and 1 patient with a PIK3CGmt anaplastic oligodendroglioma had clinical and radiological benefit lasting 5.5 months. Treatment was well tolerated with predictable G1-2 adverse events (AEs). G3 toxicities of neutropenia (n=6), thrombocytopenia (2), rash (2), mucositis (1) and raised transaminases (1 each) were all transient with no G4/5 AEs. Significant decreases in tumour pRb, and pAKT and pGSK3ß in PRP, confirmed modulation of both CDK4/6 and PI3K pathways at R2PD. Conclusions: Doublet P+T is well tolerated at the combination RP2D, with PD evidence of PI3K and CDK4/6 modulation in both plasma and tumor. Promising preliminary anti-tumor activity is seen in a mixed histology cohort selected for activating PIK3 mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT02389842.

Genomic markers of early progression on fulvestrant with or without palbociclib for ER+ advanced breast cancer in the PALOMA-3 trial

1010

Background: Markers of early progression on endocrine therapy in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors remain limited despite the key role of these combinations in treating of ER+ advanced breast cancer (ABC). We investigated genomic aberrations in patients treated with fulvestrant, with and without palbociclib, with a circulating tumor DNA analysis of baseline plasma in the PALOMA-3 trial. Methods: PALOMA-3 was a phase III trial that randomized 521 patients with ER+/HER2- ABC 2:1 to palbociclib plus fulvestrant (P+F) or placebo plus fulvestrant (F). Using baseline plasma samples, somatic mutations were assessed with a 17 gene panel. Copy number aberrations (CNA) were characterized with a 14 gene panel including ~800 SNPs in 8 commonly altered regions for estimation of tumor purity, the percentage of plasma DNA that was derived from tumor cells. Results for mutations and CNAs were available in 310 pts (203 P+F, 107 F) and were associated with clinical characteristics and progression free survival (PFS) using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, including tumor purity and treatment as variables. Results: In the multivariable analysis of the whole cohort, higher baseline tumor purity in plasma was associated with worse PFS (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09 – 1.32, p = 0.0001, HR per 10% increase in purity). Baseline TP53 mutation was also associated with shorter PFS (HR 1.84, 95%CI 1.27 – 2.65, p = 0.0011), as was baseline FGFR1 amplification (HR 2.91, 95%CI 1.61 – 5.25, p = 0.0004). PIK3CA and ESR1 mutations had no significant association with PFS in the multivariable model. Palbociclib treatment effect was comparable with the overall trial result (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.32 - 0.57, p < 0.0001). TP53 mutations were significantly associated with visceral (q = 0.046) and soft tissue/LN metastases (q = 0.042) and the number of disease sites (q = 0.0086) after correction for multiple testing. Conclusions: TP53 mutation, FGFR1 amplification , and tumor purity in plasma identified patients at risk of early progression In PALOMA-3. If validated these results could inform future clinical trials of CDK4/6 inhibitors combinations.

Molecular Testing in Breast Cancer

Molecular testing for genetic and genomic variation has become an integral part of breast cancer management. Patients with a family history of breast cancer or other tumors, bilateral breast cancers, or early-onset breast cancers warrant genetic testing to determine whether a hereditary cancer syndrome is present. The availability of PARP inhibitors-drugs that are selectively active in BRCA1/2-associated breast cancers-has created the need for hereditary cancer testing for all patients diagnosed with advanced breast cancer. Tumor genomic profiling is the standard of care for many types of malignancies and is becoming increasingly important in the management of advanced breast cancer. Targetable mutations in advanced breast cancer include PIK3CA, HER2, and rare instances of mismatch deficiency or other targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The development of methods for sequencing cell-free DNA should allow for broader and easier implementation of tumor genomic testing. Transcriptome-based expression signatures have become the standard of care in the management of early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. These assays provide prognostic significance in the setting of adjuvant endocrine therapy and are predictive for benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Collectively, these developments underscore the contemporary reality that molecular testing is now part of the clinical management for the majority of patients with breast cancer.

BEECH: a dose-finding run-in followed by a randomised phase II study assessing the efficacy of AKT inhibitor capivasertib (AZD5363) combined with paclitaxel in patients with estrogen receptor-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer, and in a PIK3CA mutant sub-population

BACKGROUND

BEECH investigated the efficacy of capivasertib (AZD5363), an oral inhibitor of AKT isoforms 1-3, in combination with the first-line weekly paclitaxel for advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, and in a phosphoinositide 3-kinase, catalytic, alpha polypeptide mutation sub-population (PIK3CA+).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

BEECH consisted of an open-label, phase Ib safety run-in (part A) in 38 patients with advanced breast cancer, and a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase II expansion (part B) in 110 women with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. In part A, patients received paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 (days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) with capivasertib taken twice daily (b.i.d.) at two intermittent ascending dosing schedules. In part B, patients were randomly assigned, stratified by PIK3CA mutation status, to receive paclitaxel with either capivasertib or placebo. The primary end point for part A was safety to recommend a dose and schedule for part B; primary end points for part B were progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall and PIK3CA+ sub-population.

RESULTS

Capivasertib was well tolerated, with a 400 mg b.i.d. 4 days on/3 days off treatment schedule selected in part A. In part B, median PFS in the overall population was 10.9 months with capivasertib versus 8.4 months with placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80; P = 0.308]. In the PIK3CA+ sub-population, median PFS was 10.9 months with capivasertib versus 10.8 months with placebo (HR 1.11; P = 0.760). Based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event v4.0, the most common grade ≥3 adverse events in the capivasertib group were diarrhoea, hyperglycaemia, neutropoenia and maculopapular rash. Dose intensity of paclitaxel was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Capivasertib had no apparent impact on the tolerability and dose intensity of paclitaxel. Adding capivasertib to weekly paclitaxel did not prolong PFS in the overall population or PIK3CA+ sub-population of ER+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer patients.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01625286.

Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases

Background

This report assesses the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) in women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) with or without visceral metastases.

Patients and methods

Pre- and postmenopausal women with disease progression following prior ET (PALOMA-3; N = 521) and postmenopausal women untreated for ABC (PALOMA-2; N = 666) were randomized 2 : 1 to ET (fulvestrant or letrozole, respectively) plus palbociclib or placebo. Progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and patient-reported quality of life (QoL) were evaluated by prior treatment and visceral involvement.

Results

Visceral metastases incidence was higher in patients with prior resistance to ET (58.3%, PALOMA-3) than in patients naive to ET in the ABC setting (48.6%, PALOMA-2). In patients with prior resistance to ET and visceral metastases, median PFS (mPFS) was 9.2 months with palbociclib plus fulvestrant versus 3.4 months with placebo plus fulvestrant [hazard ratio (HR), 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.35–0.61], and objective response rate (ORR) was 28.0% versus 6.7%, respectively. In patients with nonvisceral metastases, mPFS was 16.6 versus 7.3 months, HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.36–0.77. In patients with visceral disease and naive to ET in the advanced disease setting, mPFS was 19.3 months with palbociclib plus letrozole versus 12.9 months with placebo plus letrozole (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47–0.85); ORR was 55.1% versus 40.0%; in patients with nonvisceral disease, mPFS was not reached with palbociclib plus letrozole versus 16.8 months with placebo plus letrozole (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.36–0.70). In patients with prior resistance to ET with visceral metastases, palbociclib plus fulvestrant significantly delayed deterioration of QoL versus placebo plus fulvestrant, whereas patient-reported QoL was maintained with palbociclib plus letrozole in patients naive to endocrine-based therapy for ABC.

Conclusions

Palbociclib plus ET prolonged mPFS in patients with visceral metastases, increased ORRs, and in patients previously treated for ABC, delayed QoL deterioration, presenting a standard treatment option among patients with visceral metastases amenable to endocrine-based therapy.

Clinical trial registration

NCT01942135, NCT01740427

Long-term Pooled Safety Analysis of Palbociclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Palbociclib administered with endocrine therapy was tolerable when the overall incidence of toxicities was assessed separately for three PALOMA studies. This study analyzed pooled, longer-term PALOMA safety data longitudinally.

METHODS

Data were pooled from three randomized phase II and III studies (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00721409, NCT01740427, NCT01942135) of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‒negative advanced breast cancer patients. Front-line patients were randomly assigned to receive letrozole with/without palbociclib (PALOMA-1) or letrozole plus palbociclib/placebo (PALOMA-2). In PALOMA-3, patients with prior endocrine resistance received fulvestrant plus palbociclib/placebo. The cumulative event rates of adverse events (AEs), reporting up to 50 months of treatment, were assessed over time.

RESULTS

Patients who received endocrine therapy (n = 1343) were included in this pooled analysis (872 were also treated with palbociclib, and 471 were not). The most common AEs with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy were neutropenia and infections (any grade, 80.6% and 54.7%, respectively), which were higher than in the endocrine monotherapy arm (any grade, 5.3% and 36.9%). The most common hematologic AEs (≥15.0% in the palbociclib arm) were more likely to be reported in the initial months of the study, after which time the cumulative event rate did not substantially increase. With palbociclib plus endocrine therapy, any grade AEs leading to permanent discontinuation over three years occurred in only 8.3% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these long-term safety analyses, there is no evidence of specific cumulative or delayed toxicities with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy, supporting the ongoing investigation of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (NCT02513394).

Cyclin E1 Expression and Palbociclib Efficacy in Previously Treated Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

A large-panel gene expression analysis was conducted to identify biomarkers associated with the effectiveness of adding palbociclib to fulvestrant.

METHODS

The PALOMA-3 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01942135) trial randomly assigned 521 endocrine-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer to receive palbociclib plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant. Primary analysis was first conducted on 10 genes on the basis of pathway biology and evidence from previous studies followed by a systematic panel-wide search among 2,534 cancer-related genes. The association of gene expression with the effect of palbociclib on progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, with gene expression as a continuous variable or dichotomized by median. An independent breast cancer cohort from the Preoperative Palbociclib (POP) Clinical Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02008734) was used for validation, in 61 patients with primary breast cancer treated with 2 weeks of palbociclib.

RESULTS

In the PALOMA-3 trial, 302 patients had tumor tissue analyzed (palbociclib arm, 194 patients; placebo arm, 108 patients). Palbociclib efficacy was lower in patients with high versus low cyclin E1 (CCNE1) mRNA expression (median PFS: palbociclib arm, 7.6 v 14.1 months; placebo arm, 4.0 v 4.8 months, respectively; interaction P unadjusted = .00238; false discovery rate–adjusted P = .0238). CCNE1 mRNA was more predictive in metastatic than in archival primary biopsy tissue samples. No significant interaction was found between treatment and expression levels of CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D1, and RB1. Palbociclib was efficacious in both luminal A and luminal B tumors. High CCNE1 mRNA expression was associated with poor antiproliferative activity of palbociclib in the POP trial (P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Addition of palbociclib to fulvestrant demonstrated efficacy in all biomarker groups, although high CCNE1 mRNA expression was associated with relative resistance to palbociclib.

Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor palbociclib, in combination with fulvestrant therapy, prolongs progression-free survival among patients with hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer. We report the results of a prespecified analysis of overall survival.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had progression or relapse during previous endocrine therapy to receive palbociclib plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant. We analyzed overall survival; the effect of palbociclib according to the prespecified stratification factors of presence or absence of sensitivity to endocrine therapy, presence or absence of visceral metastatic disease, and menopausal status; the efficacy of subsequent therapies after disease progression; and safety.

RESULTS

Among 521 patients who underwent randomization, the median overall survival was 34.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.8 to 40.0) in the palbociclib-fulvestrant group and 28.0 months (95% CI, 23.6 to 34.6) in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio for death, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.03; P=0.09; absolute difference, 6.9 months). CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment after the completion of the trial regimen occurred in 16% of the patients in the placebo-fulvestrant group. Among 410 patients with sensitivity to previous endocrine therapy, the median overall survival was 39.7 months (95% CI, 34.8 to 45.7) in the palbociclib-fulvestrant group and 29.7 months (95% CI, 23.8 to 37.9) in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.94; absolute difference, 10.0 months). The median duration of subsequent therapy was similar in the two groups, and the median time to the receipt of chemotherapy was 17.6 months in the palbociclib-fulvestrant group, as compared with 8.8 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.73; P<0.001). No new safety signals were observed with 44.8 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had sensitivity to previous endocrine therapy, treatment with palbociclib-fulvestrant resulted in longer overall survival than treatment with placebo-fulvestrant. The differences in overall survival in the entire trial group were not significant. (Funded by Pfizer; PALOMA-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01942135 .).

Predictors of prolonged benefit from palbociclib plus fulvestrant in women with endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer in PALOMA-3

BACKGROUND

The addition of palbociclib to fulvestrant improved clinical outcomes over placebo-fulvestrant in endocrine-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients in PALOMA-3. Here, we examined factors predictive of long-term benefit.

METHODS

Premenopausal-peri/postmenopausal patients with endocrine-resistant, hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative MBC were randomised 2:1 to fulvestrant (500 mg) and either palbociclib (125 mg/d; 3/1 schedule; n = 347) or placebo (n = 174). Baseline characteristics, mutation status and HR expression levels were compared in patients with and without prolonged benefit (treatment duration ≥18 months).

RESULTS

By August 2016, 100 patients (29%) on palbociclib-fulvestrant and 26 (15%) on placebo-fulvestrant demonstrated prolonged benefit, with long-term responders in both arms sharing common clinical characteristics. They usually had less disease burden at baseline versus those treated <18 months, such as having one disease site (40% vs 29% on palbociclib-fulvestrant and 69% vs 29% on placebo-fulvestrant), bone-only disease (32% vs 22% and 46% vs 17%) and were less heavily pretreated (69% vs 56% and 73% vs 60% had ≤2 prior therapies). Baseline tumour ESR1 and PIK3CA mutation rates were lower among long-term responders in both arms; median oestrogen receptor H-scores were similar, whereas progesterone receptor H-scores were higher among long-term responders.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory analysis demonstrates that some patients with endocrine-resistant MBC derive significant and prolonged benefit when treated with palbociclib-fulvestrant, with fewer patients experiencing similar efficacy with placebo-fulvestrant. The current analysis did not identify specific molecular or clinical factors prognostic of long-term benefit with palbociclib-fulvestrant (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01942135).

The Genetic Landscape and Clonal Evolution of Breast Cancer Resistance to Palbociclib plus Fulvestrant in the PALOMA-3 Trial

CDK4/6 inhibition with endocrine therapy is now a standard of care for advanced estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Mechanisms of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance have been described preclinically, with limited evidence from clinical samples. We conducted paired baseline and end-of-treatment circulating tumor DNA sequencing from 195 patients in the PALOMA-3 randomized phase III trial of palbociclib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant. We show that clonal evolution occurs frequently during treatment, reflecting substantial subclonal complexity in breast cancer that has progressed after prior endocrine therapy. RB1 mutations emerged only in the palbociclib plus fulvestrant arm and in a minority of patients (6/127, 4.7%, P = 0.041). New driver mutations emerged in PIK3CA (P = 0.00069) and ESR1 after treatment in both arms, in particular ESR1 Y537S (P = 0.0037). Evolution of driver gene mutations was uncommon in patients progressing early on palbociclib plus fulvestrant but common in patients progressing later on treatment. These findings inform future treatment strategies to address resistance to palbociclib plus fulvestrant.Significance: Acquired mutations from fulvestrant are a major driver of resistance to fulvestrant and palbociclib combination therapy. ESR1 Y537S mutation promotes resistance to fulvestrant. Clonal evolution results in frequent acquisition of driver mutations in patients progressing late on therapy, which suggests that early and late progression have distinct mechanisms of resistance. Cancer Discov; 8(11); 1390-403. ©2018 AACR. See related commentary by Schiff and Jeselsohn, p. 1352 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1333.

Abstract CT039: Cyclin E1 (CCNE1) expression associates with benefit from palbociclib in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the PALOMA3 trial

BACKGROUND: The CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant (F) improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs F alone in previously-treated MBC. Prior pre-clinical research, and the NeoPalAna window study, identified high CCNE1 expression as a potential palbociclib resistance marker. We conducted large panel gene expression analysis of baseline tumor tissue to identify biomarkers (BMs) that predicted the relative benefit of palbociclib.

METHODS: The PALOMA3 trial randomized 521 patients (pts) with endocrine-pretreated MBC to receive palbociclib + F or placebo (PBO) + F. All pts, except bone only or early relapse, provided FFPE tissue taken from recurrent disease. EdgeSeq Oncology BM Panel (HTG Molecular Diagnostics) was used for mRNA profiling, assessing 2534 cancer related genes. Primary objective was to evaluate the association of cell cycle pathway with palbociclib + F vs F alone treatment effect by using gene expression as a continuous variable or dichotomization by median level with Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS: 302 pts had tumor tissue analyzed (194/347 [56%] palbociclib + F; 108/174 [62%] PBO+F). The BM and overall populations had similar treatment effect. Benefit from palbociclib was greater in patients with low tumor CCNE1 expression (median PFS: palbociclib + F 14.1 mo vs PBO+F 4.8 mo, HR 0.32) than high tumor CCNE1 expression (palbociclib + F 7.6 mo vs PBO+F 4.0 mo; HR 0.85) (interaction p=0.0024). Similar results were observed with CCNE1 as a continuous variable (interaction p=0.0008). Expression levels of CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D1 and RB1 did not associate with benefit from palbociclib, and both luminal A and B tumors derived benefit from palbociclib. In exploratory analysis, high E2F-regulon expression predicted for relative resistance to palbociclib.

CONCLUSION: Higher expression of CCNE1 was associated with relative resistance to palbociclib, although all biomarker groups derived benefit from treatment. This data supports CDK2 as the key bypass kinase of CDK4/6 inhibition, and potential to target CDK2 to subvert resistance. Sponsor: Pfizer

Citation Format: Nicholas C. Turner, Yuan Liu, Zhou Zhu, Sherene Loi, Marco Colleoni, Sibylle Loibl, Angela DeMichele, Nadia Harbeck, Fabrice André, Zhe Zhang, Carla Giorgetti, Cynthia Huang Bartlett, Massimo Cristofanilli. Cyclin E1 (CCNE1) expression associates with benefit from palbociclib in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the PALOMA3 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT039.

Abstract 3596: Biomarkers of response to CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in hormone receptor (HR) positive and HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) patient-derived xenografts (PDX)

The cell cycle G1-restriction point is frequently deregulated in HR+ BC by alterations of cyclin D1 (CCND1), p16 (CDKN2A) or pRb (RB1). CDK4/6i (ribociclib, abemaciclib and palbociclib) have shown clinical activity in metastatic HR+ BC, both as single agents and in combination with endocrine therapy. Currently, no biomarkers of response to CDK4/6i have been identified beyond HR expression and little is known about mechanisms of acquired resistance.

Twenty-one PDXs were established from HR+, HER2+ or HR+/HER2+ BC patient biopsies and their response to ribociclib was evaluated in vivo and ex vivo in matrigel cultures. Acquired-resistance was generated in vivo by isolating tumors that escaped therapy overtime. In order to identify response biomarkers, genetic and proteomic analysis of PDXs were performed and correlated with ribociclib antitumor activity. Candidates were validated in a cohort of 8 tumor samples from patients treated with abemaciclib monotherapy and in vitro. Combination with the PI3K-alpha inhibitor (PI3Ki) BYL719 was explored in vivo.

In vivo, ribociclib exhibited antitumor activity in five out of 21 PDXs (24%), two of which acquired resistance after continuous dosage (75mg/kg, 6IW). Ex vivo matrigel cultures recapitulated the in vivo response with 75% sensitivity and 92% specificity (p=0.01), providing a novel approach for high throughput screening. Baseline levels of ER, PR and Ki67 protein or PIK3CA/ESR1 mutations did not discriminate between ribociclib-resistant/sensitive PDXs, whereas CCND1/D2-amplification/overexpression were only found in ribociclib-resistant models. Importantly, sensitive PDXs exhibited significant Ki67 reduction upon ribociclib treatment, higher baseline pRb- and lower p16-staining compared to ribociclib-resistant PDXs (p=0.004, 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). Three out of 8 acquired-resistant tumors (37.5%) exhibited pRb loss. In vitro, RB1 knockdown and cyclin D1/D2-overexpression resulted in higher BrdU incorporation and higher IC50 than control cells upon ribociclib treatment. p16 expression was significantly lower in samples of patients exhibiting clinical benefit with abemaciclib monotherapy (p=0.04). Remarkably, combination of ribociclib with a PI3Ki resulted in appreciable antitumor activity in 18 out of 20 PDXs (90%), including two models resistant to fulvestrant given in combination with ribociclib.

In conclusion, HR+, HER2+ and HR+/HER2+ BC PDXs expressing both high Rb- and low p16-protein levels are sensitive to CDK4/6i whereas deregulation of the G1-restriction point due to low pRb or high cyclin D1/D2 protein levels is associated with resistance to ribociclib monotherapy. Addition of a PI3Ki markedly improves the antitumor response of ribociclib in most of PDXs, suggesting that the PI3K pathway may play a pivotal role in limiting the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibition.

Citation Format: Marta Palafox, María Teresa Herrera-Abreu, Meritxell Bellet, Mafalda Oliveira, Alejandra Bruna, Olga Rodriguez, Marta Guzmán, Judit Grueso, Cristina Vilaplana, Joaquín Arribas, Emmanuelle di Tomaso, Faye Su, Carlos Caldas, Nicholas C. Turner, Rodrigo Dienstmann, José Baselga, Maurizio Scaltriti, Javier Cortés, Cristina Saura, Violeta Serra. Biomarkers of response to CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in hormone receptor (HR) positive and HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) patient-derived xenografts (PDX) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3596.

Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review

PURPOSE.—

Clinical use of analytical tests to assess genomic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasing. This joint review from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists summarizes current information about clinical ctDNA assays and provides a framework for future research.

METHODS.—

An Expert Panel conducted a literature review on the use of ctDNA assays for solid tumors, including preanalytical variables, analytical validity, interpretation and reporting, and clinical validity and utility.

RESULTS.—

The literature search identified 1338 references. Of those, 390, plus 31 references supplied by the Expert Panel, were selected for full-text review. There were 77 articles selected for inclusion.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The evidence indicates that testing for ctDNA is optimally performed on plasma collected in cell stabilization or EDTA tubes, with EDTA tubes processed within 6 hours of collection. Some ctDNA assays have demonstrated clinical validity and utility with certain types of advanced cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence of clinical validity and utility for the majority of ctDNA assays in advanced cancer. Evidence shows discordance between the results of ctDNA assays and genotyping tumor specimens, and supports tumor tissue genotyping to confirm undetected results from ctDNA tests. There is no evidence of clinical utility and little evidence of clinical validity of ctDNA assays in early-stage cancer, treatment monitoring, or residual disease detection. There is no evidence of clinical validity or clinical utility to suggest that ctDNA assays are useful for cancer screening, outside of a clinical trial. Given the rapid pace of research, reevaluation of the literature will shortly be required, along with the development of tools and guidance for clinical practice.

Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review

Purpose Clinical use of analytical tests to assess genomic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasing. This joint review from ASCO and the College of American Pathologists summarizes current information about clinical ctDNA assays and provides a framework for future research. Methods An Expert Panel conducted a literature review on the use of ctDNA assays for solid tumors, including pre-analytical variables, analytical validity, interpretation and reporting, and clinical validity and utility. Results The literature search identified 1,338 references. Of those, 390, plus 31 references supplied by the Expert Panel, were selected for full-text review. There were 77 articles selected for inclusion. Conclusion The evidence indicates that testing for ctDNA is optimally performed on plasma collected in cell stabilization or EDTA tubes, with EDTA tubes processed within 6 hours of collection. Some ctDNA assays have demonstrated clinical validity and utility with certain types of advanced cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence of clinical validity and utility for the majority of ctDNA assays in advanced cancer. Evidence shows discordance between the results of ctDNA assays and genotyping tumor specimens and supports tumor tissue genotyping to confirm undetected results from ctDNA tests. There is no evidence of clinical utility and little evidence of clinical validity of ctDNA assays in early-stage cancer, treatment monitoring, or residual disease detection. There is no evidence of clinical validity and clinical utility to suggest that ctDNA assays are useful for cancer screening, outside of a clinical trial. Given the rapid pace of research, re-evaluation of the literature will shortly be required, along with the development of tools and guidance for clinical practice.

Early circulating tumor DNA dynamics and clonal selection with palbociclib and fulvestrant for breast cancer

CDK4/6 inhibition substantially improves progression-free survival (PFS) for women with advanced estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, although there are no predictive biomarkers. Early changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) level may provide early response prediction, but the impact of tumor heterogeneity is unknown. Here we use plasma samples from patients in the randomized phase III PALOMA-3 study of CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib and fulvestrant for women with advanced breast cancer and show that relative change in PIK3CA ctDNA level after 15 days treatment strongly predicts PFS on palbociclib and fulvestrant (hazard ratio 3.94, log-rank p = 0.0013). ESR1 mutations selected by prior hormone therapy are shown to be frequently sub clonal, with ESR1 ctDNA dynamics offering limited prediction of clinical outcome. These results suggest that early ctDNA dynamics may provide a robust biomarker for CDK4/6 inhibitors, with early ctDNA dynamics demonstrating divergent response of tumor sub clones to treatment.