26
|
Sethi A, Singh N, Gupta R, Dwivedi T, Patel G. P-656 Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on clinical outcome in fully vaccinated infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles at tertiary care centre: prospective observational study. Hum Reprod 2022. [PMCID: PMC9384392 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac107.605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Study question Does immune response to COVID-19 vaccination affect the clinical outcome in fully vaccinated infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles? Summary answer COVID-19 IgG antibodies are present in follicular fluid post vaccination and higher immune response increases duration of gonadotrophins required and negatively impacts the IVF outcome. What is known already Recent studies assessed the influence of COVID-19 infection and mRNA COVID-19 vaccine on the stimulation cycle characteristics and embryological variables of patients undergoing IVF cycle and found no effect on the IVF outcome in their immediate IVF cycle after recovery, except for a decreased number of top quality embryos. One study reported infection or mRNA vaccine results in rapid formation of anti-COVID IgG which can be detected in follicular fluid. This immune response did not lead to any significant negative effect on ovarian follicular function. There is a possibility that COVID-19 infection might affect numerous fertility-linked proteins. Study design, size, duration Prospective observational study, conducted at Division of Reproductive Medicine of tertiary care institute. After taking informed consent, 32 patients who satisfy the inclusion and exclusion criteria with history of receiving two doses of Covishield or Covaxin vaccine with at-least 2 weeks from last dose, were recruited for IVF/ICSI cycles from December 2021 to January 2022, for assessing COVID-19 IgG antibodies in their follicular fluid. Participants/materials, setting, methods Women of 21-40 years with normal ovarian reserve and normal uterine cavity were included, those with history of COVID infection were excluded. All patients underwent GnRH antagonist protocol. Follicular fluid was collected at time of oocyte retrieval. After collecting oocytes, 400 microlitre of follicular fluid was stored at -80 and later thawed and analysed for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies (ADVIA Centaur COV2G assay, Germany) which are expressed in index value and reported as reactive (≥1 index). Main results and the role of chance Out of 32, 21 (65.6%) of the participants had received COVISHIELD (V1)and 11 (34.3%) received COVAXIN (V2). The mean gap between vaccine and the IVF cycle was 84.94 ± 52.65 days. The mean COVID IgG antibody titres (Index) were significantly higher in V1, 28.77±33.50 (0.34 -100), than V2 2.28±3.74(0.05-13.23), p<0.001. Patients with higher antibody titres, required longer duration of ovarian stimulation, rho=0.42, p = 0.017. Patients with higher COVID IgG antibodies were negatively correlated with clinical pregnancy rate (20.9 0± 29.68 vs 4.60 ± 6.28, p = 0.153). The time gap from the last dose of vaccine to IVF cycle had moderate negative correlation with percentage of grade-I embryos out of the total embryos fertilised (%), rho= -0.33, p = 0.068. Furthermore, higher gonadotropins doses were required in patients with high antibody titres, rho=0.25, p = 0.160, and amongst V1 vs V2, total dose of gonadotropins required was 3802.38±742.92 vs 3422.73±564.52, respectively, p=0.115. COVID IgG antibody titres had weak negative correlation with number of grade-I embryos, rho= -0.16, p = 0.396. The time gap from the last dose of vaccine to IVF cycle had a weak negative correlation with number of grade-I embryos, rho=-0.28, p = 0.124. Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitation of this study is small sample size. However, the study is currently ongoing, and these are the interim results of the same. As prospective studies with larger sample size would be required to assess the effect of different COVID-19 vaccines in different populations on the IVF outcomes. Wider implications of the findings The present study confirms the presence of COVID IgG antibodies in follicular fluid in vaccinated women, and proves that COVISHIELD vaccinated patients had higher antibody titres. Higher antibody titres require longer duration of stimulation and result in poorer outcomes so a longer interval from vaccine to IVF should be recommended. Trial registration number NA
Collapse
|
27
|
Dogra Y, Singh N, Kumar P, Mathur S, Sharma A. P-394 Peripheral and uterine natural killer cell cut-off levels and their correlation in fertile controls and women with unexplained recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac107.371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
What is cut-off value for peripheral and uterine natural killer (pNK, uNK) cells and any correlation between them in fertile and RIF women?
Summary answer
Cut-off values were 7% for uNK and 11.6% for pNK in fertile controls. No significant correlation observed among fertile and infertile women with RIF.
What is known already
Association of uNK and pNK cells with infertility is debatable. It is not clear whether measuring NK cell levels in RIF has a role. pNk cell levels however has been used in various studies to guide the need of immunotherapy in RIF women. Definition of normal range of uNK cell numbers has also not been stated clearly because of lack of standardised protocol. Literature reveals the cut off values for pNk cells to be 12% or 18% and for uNK cells between 5-12.9%. Correlation between uNK and pNK cells in fertile or RIF women has not been studied earlier.
Study design, size, duration
A prospective study was conducted at ART Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at tertiary care institute during a period from January 2019 to January 2021. Thirty women with RIF and fifty fertile controls with age <35 years having regular menstrual cycles and no hormonal treatment in last 3 months were enrolled in the study for uNK and pNK cell testing. The permission was obtained from the Institute Ethics Committee.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
Subjects included women with RIF with age 20-35 years, tubal and unexplained factors, normal ovarian reserve, normal karyotype and normal uterine cavity. In both subjects and controls, midluteal endometrial biopsy sample was taken for Immunohistochemistry staining of CD 56+ cells to determine uNK cells. Peripheral venous blood was also obtained at the time of biopsy for flow cytometry in peripheral blood mononuclear cells to determine pNK cells. Cut off values were derived from fertile controls.
Main results and the role of chance
The mean age and BMI were comparable between fertile control and study group(29.45±3.3 vs 31.17±3.3 years, 22.97±1.89 vs 23.21±2.2 kg/m2; p-value >0.05). The control group had median value of 7% for uNK cell levels and 11.6% for pNK cell levels. In RIF subjects, the median value for uNK cells was 13.5% and even though higher compared to controls it was not statistically significant(p-value >0.05) . The median pNK values were comparable among controls and RIF group (11.6% vs. 12%). All RIF subjects did not have elevated NK cell levels. 18 (60%) subjects had elevated uNK cell levels (more than 7%) whereas 40% had below the reference value. pNK cells were also elevated in only 53.3% of subject population. There was positive correlation found between uNK and pNK cell levels in RIF subjects, however it was not statistically significant (r 0.312, p-value 0.09). In fertile controls, there was insignificant negative correlation between uNK and pNK cell levels (r -0.231, p-value 0.33).
Limitations, reasons for caution
The small sample size is the foremost limitation of study.
Wider implications of the findings
uNK cell testing may be worthwhile in women with unexplained RIF so as to guide immunotherapy to improve pregnancy outcomes. As no significant correlation has been found between pNK and uNK cells in fertile and RIF women, pNK cell testing in RIF women may be done with caution.
Trial registration number
Not Applicable
Collapse
|
28
|
Abbott R, Abbott T, Acernese F, Ackley K, Adams C, Adhikari N, Adhikari R, Adya V, Affeldt C, Agarwal D, Agathos M, Agatsuma K, Aggarwal N, Aguiar O, Aiello L, Ain A, Ajith P, Akutsu T, Albanesi S, Allocca A, Altin P, Amato A, Anand C, Anand S, Ananyeva A, Anderson S, Anderson W, Ando M, Andrade T, Andres N, Andrić T, Angelova S, Ansoldi S, Antelis J, Antier S, Appert S, Arai K, Arai K, Arai Y, Araki S, Araya A, Araya M, Areeda J, Arène M, Aritomi N, Arnaud N, Aronson S, Arun K, Asada H, Asali Y, Ashton G, Aso Y, Assiduo M, Aston S, Astone P, Aubin F, Austin C, Babak S, Badaracco F, Bader M, Badger C, Bae S, Bae Y, Baer A, Bagnasco S, Bai Y, Baiotti L, Baird J, Bajpai R, Ball M, Ballardin G, Ballmer S, Balsamo A, Baltus G, Banagiri S, Bankar D, Barayoga J, Barbieri C, Barish B, Barker D, Barneo P, Barone F, Barr B, Barsotti L, Barsuglia M, Barta D, Bartlett J, Barton M, Bartos I, Bassiri R, Basti A, Bawaj M, Bayley J, Baylor A, Bazzan M, Bécsy B, Bedakihale V, Bejger M, Belahcene I, Benedetto V, Moreno G, Mori Y, Morisaki S, Moriwaki Y, Mours B, Mow-Lowry C, Mozzon S, Muciaccia F, Mukherjee A, Mukherjee D, Beniwal D, Mukherjee S, Mukherjee S, Mukherjee S, Mukund N, Mullavey A, Munch J, Muñiz E, Murray P, Musenich R, Muusse S, Bennett T, Nadji S, Nagano K, Nagano S, Nagar A, Nakamura K, Nakano H, Nakano M, Nakashima R, Nakayama Y, Napolano V, Bentley J, Nardecchia I, Narikawa T, Naticchioni L, Nayak B, Nayak R, Negishi R, Neil B, Neilson J, Nelemans G, Nelson T, BenYaala M, Nery M, Neubauer P, Neunzert A, Ng K, Ng S, Nguyen C, Nguyen P, Nguyen T, Quynh LN, Ni WT, Bergamin F, Nichols S, Nishizawa A, Nissanke S, Nitoglia E, Nocera F, Norman M, North C, Nozaki S, Nuttall L, Oberling J, Berger B, O’Brien B, Obuchi Y, O’Dell J, Oelker E, Ogaki W, Oganesyan G, Oh J, Oh K, Oh S, Ohashi M, Bernuzzi S, Ohishi N, Ohkawa M, Ohme F, Ohta H, Okada M, Okutani Y, Okutomi K, Olivetto C, Oohara K, Ooi C, Bersanetti D, Oram R, O’Reilly B, Ormiston R, Ormsby N, Ortega L, O’Shaughnessy R, O’Shea E, Oshino S, Ossokine S, Osthelder C, Bertolini A, Otabe S, Ottaway D, Overmier H, Pace A, Pagano G, Page M, Pagliaroli G, Pai A, Pai S, Palamos J, Betzwieser J, Palashov O, Palomba C, Pan H, Pan K, Panda P, Pang H, Pang P, Pankow C, Pannarale F, Pant B, Beveridge D, Panther F, Paoletti F, Paoli A, Paolone A, Parisi A, Park H, Park J, Parker W, Pascucci D, Pasqualetti A, Bhandare R, Passaquieti R, Passuello D, Patel M, Pathak M, Patricelli B, Patron A, Paul S, Payne E, Pedraza M, Pegoraro M, Bhardwaj U, Pele A, Arellano FP, Penn S, Perego A, Pereira A, Pereira T, Perez C, Périgois C, Perkins C, Perreca A, Bhattacharjee D, Perriès S, Petermann J, Petterson D, Pfeiffer H, Pham K, Phukon K, Piccinni O, Pichot M, Piendibene M, Piergiovanni F, Bhaumik S, Pierini L, Pierro V, Pillant G, Pillas M, Pilo F, Pinard L, Pinto I, Pinto M, Piotrzkowski K, Pirello M, Bilenko I, Pitkin M, Placidi E, Planas L, Plastino W, Pluchar C, Poggiani R, Polini E, Pong D, Ponrathnam S, Popolizio P, Billingsley G, Porter E, Poulton R, Powell J, Pracchia M, Pradier T, Prajapati A, Prasai K, Prasanna R, Pratten G, Principe M, Bini S, Prodi G, Prokhorov L, Prosposito P, Prudenzi L, Puecher A, Punturo M, Puosi F, Puppo P, Pürrer M, Qi H, Birney R, Quetschke V, Quitzow-James R, Raab F, Raaijmakers G, Radkins H, Radulesco N, Raffai P, Rail S, Raja S, Rajan C, Birnholtz O, Ramirez K, Ramirez T, Ramos-Buades A, Rana J, Rapagnani P, Rapol U, Ray A, Raymond V, Raza N, Razzano M, Biscans S, Read J, Rees L, Regimbau T, Rei L, Reid S, Reid S, Reitze D, Relton P, Renzini A, Rettegno P, Bischi M, Rezac M, Ricci F, Richards D, Richardson J, Richardson L, Riemenschneider G, Riles K, Rinaldi S, Rink K, Rizzo M, Biscoveanu S, Robertson N, Robie R, Robinet F, Rocchi A, Rodriguez S, Rolland L, Rollins J, Romanelli M, Romano J, Romano R, Bisht A, Romel C, Romero-Rodríguez A, Romero-Shaw I, Romie J, Ronchini S, Rosa L, Rose C, Rosińska D, Ross M, Rowan S, Biswas B, Rowlinson S, Roy S, Roy S, Roy S, Rozza D, Ruggi P, Ryan K, Sachdev S, Sadecki T, Sadiq J, Bitossi M, Sago N, Saito S, Saito Y, Sakai K, Sakai Y, Sakellariadou M, Sakuno Y, Salafia O, Salconi L, Saleem M, Bizouard MA, Salemi F, Samajdar A, Sanchez E, Sanchez J, Sanchez L, Sanchis-Gual N, Sanders J, Sanuy A, Saravanan T, Sarin N, Blackburn J, Sassolas B, Satari H, Sathyaprakash B, Sato S, Sato T, Sauter O, Savage R, Sawada T, Sawant D, Sawant H, Blair C, Sayah S, Schaetzl D, Scheel M, Scheuer J, Schiworski M, Schmidt P, Schmidt S, Schnabel R, Schneewind M, Schofield R, Blair D, Schönbeck A, Schulte B, Schutz B, Schwartz E, Scott J, Scott S, Seglar-Arroyo M, Sekiguchi T, Sekiguchi Y, Sellers D, Blair R, Sengupta A, Sentenac D, Seo E, Sequino V, Sergeev A, Setyawati Y, Shaffer T, Shahriar M, Shams B, Shao L, Bobba F, Sharma A, Sharma P, Shawhan P, Shcheblanov N, Shibagaki S, Shikauchi M, Shimizu R, Shimoda T, Shimode K, Shinkai H, Bode N, Shishido T, Shoda A, Shoemaker D, Shoemaker D, ShyamSundar S, Sieniawska M, Sigg D, Singer L, Singh D, Singh N, Boer M, Singha A, Sintes A, Sipala V, Skliris V, Slagmolen B, Slaven-Blair T, Smetana J, Smith J, Smith R, Soldateschi J, Bogaert G, Somala S, Somiya K, Son E, Soni K, Soni S, Sordini V, Sorrentino F, Sorrentino N, Sotani H, Soulard R, Boldrini M, Souradeep T, Sowell E, Spagnuolo V, Spencer A, Spera M, Srinivasan R, Srivastava A, Srivastava V, Staats K, Stachie C, Bonavena L, Steer D, Steinlechner J, Steinlechner S, Stops D, Stover M, Strain K, Strang L, Stratta G, Strunk A, Sturani R, Bondu F, Stuver A, Sudhagar S, Sudhir V, Sugimoto R, Suh H, Summerscales T, Sun H, Sun L, Sunil S, Sur A, Bonilla E, Suresh J, Sutton P, Suzuki T, Suzuki T, Swinkels B, Szczepańczyk M, Szewczyk P, Tacca M, Tagoshi H, Tait S, Bonnand R, Takahashi H, Takahashi R, Takamori A, Takano S, Takeda H, Takeda M, Talbot C, Talbot C, Tanaka H, Tanaka K, Booker P, Tanaka K, Tanaka T, Tanaka T, Tanasijczuk A, Tanioka S, Tanner D, Tao D, Tao L, Martín ETS, Taranto C, Boom B, Tasson J, Telada S, Tenorio R, Terhune J, Terkowski L, Thirugnanasambandam M, Thomas M, Thomas P, Thompson J, Thondapu S, Bork R, Thorne K, Thrane E, Tiwari S, Tiwari S, Tiwari V, Toivonen A, Toland K, Tolley A, Tomaru T, Tomigami Y, Boschi V, Tomura T, Tonelli M, Torres-Forné A, Torrie C, e Melo IT, Töyrä D, Trapananti A, Travasso F, Traylor G, Trevor M, Bose N, Tringali M, Tripathee A, Troiano L, Trovato A, Trozzo L, Trudeau R, Tsai D, Tsai D, Tsang K, Tsang T, Bose S, Tsao JS, Tse M, Tso R, Tsubono K, Tsuchida S, Tsukada L, Tsuna D, Tsutsui T, Tsuzuki T, Turbang K, Bossilkov V, Turconi M, Tuyenbayev D, Ubhi A, Uchikata N, Uchiyama T, Udall R, Ueda A, Uehara T, Ueno K, Ueshima G, Boudart V, Unnikrishnan C, Uraguchi F, Urban A, Ushiba T, Utina A, Vahlbruch H, Vajente G, Vajpeyi A, Valdes G, Valentini M, Bouffanais Y, Valsan V, van Bakel N, van Beuzekom M, van den Brand J, Van Den Broeck C, Vander-Hyde D, van der Schaaf L, van Heijningen J, Vanosky J, van Putten M, Bozzi A, van Remortel N, Vardaro M, Vargas A, Varma V, Vasúth M, Vecchio A, Vedovato G, Veitch J, Veitch P, Venneberg J, Bradaschia C, Venugopalan G, Verkindt D, Verma P, Verma Y, Veske D, Vetrano F, Viceré A, Vidyant S, Viets A, Vijaykumar A, Brady P, Villa-Ortega V, Vinet JY, Virtuoso A, Vitale S, Vo T, Vocca H, von Reis E, von Wrangel J, Vorvick C, Vyatchanin S, Bramley A, Wade L, Wade M, Wagner K, Walet R, Walker M, Wallace G, Wallace L, Walsh S, Wang J, Wang J, Branch A, Wang W, Ward R, Warner J, Was M, Washimi T, Washington N, Watchi J, Weaver B, Webster S, Weinert M, Branchesi M, Weinstein A, Weiss R, Weller C, Wellmann F, Wen L, Weßels P, Wette K, Whelan J, White D, Whiting B, Brau J, Whittle C, Wilken D, Williams D, Williams M, Williamson A, Willis J, Willke B, Wilson D, Winkler W, Wipf C, Breschi M, Wlodarczyk T, Woan G, Woehler J, Wofford J, Wong I, Wu C, Wu D, Wu H, Wu S, Wysocki D, Briant T, Xiao L, Xu WR, Yamada T, Yamamoto H, Yamamoto K, Yamamoto K, Yamamoto T, Yamashita K, Yamazaki R, Yang F, Briggs J, Yang L, Yang Y, Yang Y, Yang Z, Yap M, Yeeles D, Yelikar A, Ying M, Yokogawa K, Yokoyama J, Brillet A, Yokozawa T, Yoo J, Yoshioka T, Yu H, Yu H, Yuzurihara H, Zadrożny A, Zanolin M, Zeidler S, Zelenova T, Brinkmann M, Zendri JP, Zevin M, Zhan M, Zhang H, Zhang J, Zhang L, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Zhao C, Zhao G, Brockill P, Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Zhou R, Zhou Z, Zhu X, Zhu ZH, Zucker M, Zweizig J, Brooks A, Brooks J, Brown D, Brunett S, Bruno G, Bruntz R, Bryant J, Bulik T, Bulten H, Buonanno A, Buscicchio R, Buskulic D, Buy C, Byer R, Cadonati L, Cagnoli G, Cahillane C, Bustillo JC, Callaghan J, Callister T, Calloni E, Cameron J, Camp J, Canepa M, Canevarolo S, Cannavacciuolo M, Cannon K, Cao H, Cao Z, Capocasa E, Capote E, Carapella G, Carbognani F, Carlin J, Carney M, Carpinelli M, Carrillo G, Carullo G, Carver T, Diaz JC, Casentini C, Castaldi G, Caudill S, Cavaglià M, Cavalier F, Cavalieri R, Ceasar M, Cella G, Cerdá-Durán P, Cesarini E, Chaibi W, Chakravarti K, Subrahmanya SC, Champion E, Chan CH, Chan C, Chan C, Chan K, Chan M, Chandra K, Chanial P, Chao S, Charlton P, Chase E, Chassande-Mottin E, Chatterjee C, Chatterjee D, Chatterjee D, Chaturvedi M, Chaty S, Chen C, Chen H, Chen J, Chen K, Chen X, Chen YB, Chen YR, Chen Z, Cheng H, Cheong C, Cheung H, Chia H, Chiadini F, Chiang CY, Chiarini G, Chierici R, Chincarini A, Chiofalo M, Chiummo A, Cho G, Cho H, Choudhary R, Choudhary S, Christensen N, Chu H, Chu Q, Chu YK, Chua S, Chung K, Ciani G, Ciecielag P, Cieślar M, Cifaldi M, Ciobanu A, Ciolfi R, Cipriano F, Cirone A, Clara F, Clark E, Clark J, Clarke L, Clearwater P, Clesse S, Cleva F, Coccia E, Codazzo E, Cohadon PF, Cohen D, Cohen L, Colleoni M, Collette C, Colombo A, Colpi M, Compton C, Constancio M, Conti L, Cooper S, Corban P, Corbitt T, Cordero-Carrión I, Corezzi S, Corley K, Cornish N, Corre D, Corsi A, Cortese S, Costa C, Cotesta R, Coughlin M, Coulon JP, Countryman S, Cousins B, Couvares P, Coward D, Cowart M, Coyne D, Coyne R, Creighton J, Creighton T, Criswell A, Croquette M, Crowder S, Cudell J, Cullen T, Cumming A, Cummings R, Cunningham L, Cuoco E, Curyło M, Dabadie P, Canton TD, Dall’Osso S, Dálya G, Dana A, DaneshgaranBajastani L, D’Angelo B, Danilishin S, D’Antonio S, Danzmann K, Darsow-Fromm C, Dasgupta A, Datrier L, Datta S, Dattilo V, Dave I, Davier M, Davies G, Davis D, Davis M, Daw E, Dean R, DeBra D, Deenadayalan M, Degallaix J, De Laurentis M, Deléglise S, Del Favero V, De Lillo F, De Lillo N, Del Pozzo W, DeMarchi L, De Matteis F, D’Emilio V, Demos N, Dent T, Depasse A, De Pietri R, De Rosa R, De Rossi C, DeSalvo R, De Simone R, Dhurandhar S, Díaz M, Diaz-Ortiz M, Didio N, Dietrich T, Di Fiore L, Di Fronzo C, Di Giorgio C, Di Giovanni F, Di Giovanni M, Di Girolamo T, Di Lieto A, Ding B, Di Pace S, Di Palma I, Di Renzo F, Divakarla A, Dmitriev A, Doctor Z, D’Onofrio L, Donovan F, Dooley K, Doravari S, Dorrington I, Drago M, Driggers J, Drori Y, Ducoin JG, Dupej P, Durante O, D’Urso D, Duverne PA, Dwyer S, Eassa C, Easter P, Ebersold M, Eckhardt T, Eddolls G, Edelman B, Edo T, Edy O, Effler A, Eguchi S, Eichholz J, Eikenberry S, Eisenmann M, Eisenstein R, Ejlli A, Engelby E, Enomoto Y, Errico L, Essick R, Estellés H, Estevez D, Etienne Z, Etzel T, Evans M, Evans T, Ewing B, Fafone V, Fair H, Fairhurst S, Farah A, Farinon S, Farr B, Farr W, Farrow N, Fauchon-Jones E, Favaro G, Favata M, Fays M, Fazio M, Feicht J, Fejer M, Fenyvesi E, Ferguson D, Fernandez-Galiana A, Ferrante I, Ferreira T, Fidecaro F, Figura P, Fiori I, Fishbach M, Fisher R, Fittipaldi R, Fiumara V, Flaminio R, Floden E, Fong H, Font J, Fornal B, Forsyth P, Franke A, Frasca S, Frasconi F, Frederick C, Freed J, Frei Z, Freise A, Frey R, Fritschel P, Frolov V, Fronzé G, Fujii Y, Fujikawa Y, Fukunaga M, Fukushima M, Fulda P, Fyffe M, Gabbard H, Gadre B, Gair J, Gais J, Galaudage S, Gamba R, Ganapathy D, Ganguly A, Gao D, Gaonkar S, Garaventa B, García-Núñez C, García-Quirós C, Garufi F, Gateley B, Gaudio S, Gayathri V, Ge GG, Gemme G, Gennai A, George J, Gerberding O, Gergely L, Gewecke P, Ghonge S, Ghosh A, Ghosh A, Ghosh S, Ghosh S, Giacomazzo B, Giacoppo L, Giaime J, Giardina K, Gibson D, Gier C, Giesler M, Giri P, Gissi F, Glanzer J, Gleckl A, Godwin P, Goetz E, Goetz R, Gohlke N, Goncharov B, González G, Gopakumar A, Gosselin M, Gouaty R, Gould D, Grace B, Grado A, Granata M, Granata V, Grant A, Gras S, Grassia P, Gray C, Gray R, Greco G, Green A, Green R, Gretarsson A, Gretarsson E, Griffith D, Griffiths W, Griggs H, Grignani G, Grimaldi A, Grimm S, Grote H, Grunewald S, Gruning P, Guerra D, Guidi G, Guimaraes A, Guixé G, Gulati H, Guo HK, Guo Y, Gupta A, Gupta A, Gupta P, Gustafson E, Gustafson R, Guzman F, Ha S, Haegel L, Hagiwara A, Haino S, Halim O, Hall E, Hamilton E, Hammond G, Han WB, Haney M, Hanks J, Hanna C, Hannam M, Hannuksela O, Hansen H, Hansen T, Hanson J, Harder T, Hardwick T, Haris K, Harms J, Harry G, Harry I, Hartwig D, Hasegawa K, Haskell B, Hasskew R, Haster CJ, Hattori K, Haughian K, Hayakawa H, Hayama K, Hayes F, Healy J, Heidmann A, Heidt A, Heintze M, Heinze J, Heinzel J, Heitmann H, Hellman F, Hello P, Helmling-Cornell A, Hemming G, Hendry M, Heng I, Hennes E, Hennig J, Hennig M, Hernandez A, Vivanco FH, Heurs M, Hild S, Hill P, Himemoto Y, Hines A, Hiranuma Y, Hirata N, Hirose E, Hochheim S, Hofman D, Hohmann J, Holcomb D, Holland N, Hollows I, Holmes Z, Holt K, Holz D, Hong Z, Hopkins P, Hough J, Hourihane S, Howell E, Hoy C, Hoyland D, Hreibi A, Hsieh BH, Hsu Y, Huang GZ, Huang HY, Huang P, Huang YC, Huang YJ, Huang Y, Hübner M, Huddart A, Hughey B, Hui D, Hui V, Husa S, Huttner S, Huxford R, Huynh-Dinh T, Ide S, Idzkowski B, Iess A, Ikenoue B, Imam S, Inayoshi K, Ingram C, Inoue Y, Ioka K, Isi M, Isleif K, Ito K, Itoh Y, Iyer B, Izumi K, JaberianHamedan V, Jacqmin T, Jadhav S, Jadhav S, James A, Jan A, Jani K, Janquart J, Janssens K, Janthalur N, Jaranowski P, Jariwala D, Jaume R, Jenkins A, Jenner K, Jeon C, Jeunon M, Jia W, Jin HB, Johns G, Jones A, Jones D, Jones J, Jones P, Jones R, Jonker R, Ju L, Jung P, Jung K, Junker J, Juste V, Kaihotsu K, Kajita T, Kakizaki M, Kalaghatgi C, Kalogera V, Kamai B, Kamiizumi M, Kanda N, Kandhasamy S, Kang G, Kanner J, Kao Y, Kapadia S, Kapasi D, Karat S, Karathanasis C, Karki S, Kashyap R, Kasprzack M, Kastaun W, Katsanevas S, Katsavounidis E, Katzman W, Kaur T, Kawabe K, Kawaguchi K, Kawai N, Kawasaki T, Kéfélian F, Keitel D, Key J, Khadka S, Khalili F, Khan S, Khazanov E, Khetan N, Khursheed M, Kijbunchoo N, Kim C, Kim J, Kim J, Kim K, Kim W, Kim YM, Kimball C, Kimura N, Kinley-Hanlon M, Kirchhoff R, Kissel J, Kita N, Kitazawa H, Kleybolte L, Klimenko S, Knee A, Knowles T, Knyazev E, Koch P, Koekoek G, Kojima Y, Kokeyama K, Koley S, Kolitsidou P, Kolstein M, Komori K, Kondrashov V, Kong A, Kontos A, Koper N, Korobko M, Kotake K, Kovalam M, Kozak D, Kozakai C, Kozu R, Kringel V, Krishnendu N, Królak A, Kuehn G, Kuei F, Kuijer P, Kumar A, Kumar P, Kumar R, Kumar R, Kume J, Kuns K, Kuo C, Kuo HS, Kuromiya Y, Kuroyanagi S, Kusayanagi K, Kuwahara S, Kwak K, Lagabbe P, Laghi D, Lalande E, Lam T, Lamberts A, Landry M, Lane B, Lang R, Lange J, Lantz B, La Rosa I, Lartaux-Vollard A, Lasky P, Laxen M, Lazzarini A, Lazzaro C, Leaci P, Leavey S, Lecoeuche Y, Lee H, Lee H, Lee H, Lee J, Lee K, Lee R, Lehmann J, Lemaître A, Leonardi M, Leroy N, Letendre N, Levesque C, Levin Y, Leviton J, Leyde K, Li A, Li B, Li J, Li K, Li T, Li X, Lin CY, Lin FK, Lin FL, Lin H, Lin LCC, Linde F, Linker S, Linley J, Littenberg T, Liu G, Liu J, Liu K, Liu X, Llamas F, Llorens-Monteagudo M, Lo R, Lockwood A, London L, Longo A, Lopez D, Portilla ML, Lorenzini M, Loriette V, Lormand M, Losurdo G, Lott T, Lough J, Lousto C, Lovelace G, Lucaccioni J, Lück H, Lumaca D, Lundgren A, Luo LW, Lynam J, Macas R, MacInnis M, Macleod D, MacMillan I, Macquet A, Hernandez IM, Magazzù C, Magee R, Maggiore R, Magnozzi M, Mahesh S, Majorana E, Makarem C, Maksimovic I, Maliakal S, Malik A, Man N, Mandic V, Mangano V, Mango J, Mansell G, Manske M, Mantovani M, Mapelli M, Marchesoni F, Marchio M, Marion F, Mark Z, Márka S, Márka Z, Markakis C, Markosyan A, Markowitz A, Maros E, Marquina A, Marsat S, Martelli F, Martin I, Martin R, Martinez M, Martinez V, Martinez V, Martinovic K, Martynov D, Marx E, Masalehdan H, Mason K, Massera E, Masserot A, Massinger T, Masso-Reid M, Mastrogiovanni S, Matas A, Mateu-Lucena M, Matichard F, Matiushechkina M, Mavalvala N, McCann J, McCarthy R, McClelland D, McClincy P, McCormick S, McCuller L, McGhee G, McGuire S, McIsaac C, McIver J, McRae T, McWilliams S, Meacher D, Mehmet M, Mehta A, Meijer Q, Melatos A, Melchor D, Mendell G, Menendez-Vazquez A, Menoni C, Mercer R, Mereni L, Merfeld K, Merilh E, Merritt J, Merzougui M, Meshkov S, Messenger C, Messick C, Meyers P, Meylahn F, Mhaske A, Miani A, Miao H, Michaloliakos I, Michel C, Michimura Y, Middleton H, Milano L, Miller A, Miller A, Miller B, Millhouse M, Mills J, Milotti E, Minazzoli O, Minenkov Y, Mio N, Mir L, Miravet-Tenés M, Mishra C, Mishra T, Mistry T, Mitra S, Mitrofanov V, Mitselmakher G, Mittleman R, Miyakawa O, Miyamoto A, Miyazaki Y, Miyo K, Miyoki S, Mo G, Moguel E, Mogushi K, Mohapatra S, Mohite S, Molina I, Molina-Ruiz M, Mondin M, Montani M, Moore C, Moraru D, Morawski F, More A, Moreno C. All-sky, all-frequency directional search for persistent gravitational waves from Advanced LIGO’s and Advanced Virgo’s first three observing runs. Int J Clin Exp Med 2022. [DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.105.122001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
29
|
Singh N, Gold L, Wysham K, Andrews J, O’hare A, Makris U, Lee J, George M, England B, Baker J, Jarvik J, Heagerty P, Singh S. POS0656 FRAILTY AND RISK OF ADVERSE OUTCOMES IN BIOLOGIC OR TARGETED-SYNTHETIC DMARD TREATED PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.3939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundRecently, it has been recognized that frailty and pre-frailty are common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [1]. Whether frailty status portends an increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients with RA on biologic or targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b- or tsDMARDs) remains unknown.ObjectivesTo evaluate the association between frailty and adverse outcomes in patients with RA exposed to b- or tsDMARDs.MethodsUsing the IBM/Watson MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Databases, we identified all patients with RA who filled new prescriptions (or received infusions) for TNFα antagonists (TNFi), non-TNFi biologics (rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab) or Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) between 2008-2019. We used a 1-year lookback period without the use of these drugs to identify new users. The date of the first prescription within these three drug categories was the index date. Patients’ frailty risk score was calculated using the Claims-Based Frailty Index (CFI) [2], which estimates a deficit-accumulation frailty index using International Classification of Diseases codes, Current Procedural Terminology codes, and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes in administrative claims data in the 1-year baseline period. The index ranges from 0 (not at all frail) to 1 (severely frail). The primary outcome was time to serious infections (those requiring hospitalization); secondary outcomes: any infection (outpatient or inpatient encounters) and all-cause hospitalizations.Patients were followed until 1) outcome occurrence; 2) disenrollment; 3) >90 days elapsed (or >180 days for rituximab) without further fills of the first drug categories; 4) they filled/received infusions of b-/tsDMARDs from a different drug category; or 5) 2 years after index. Cox proportional hazards adjusting for demographics, calendar year, serious and/or opportunistic infections in the 12-months prior to index were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. In separate model, we additionally adjusted for comorbidity burden, and health care utilization (HCU).ResultsA total of 62,246 patients with RA met our inclusion criteria of whom 50,910 (82%) started TNFi as their first biologic, 9525 (15%) non-TNFi biologics, and 1811 (3%) JAKi. Among these, 3928 (6%) were considered frail. In multivariable analyses, frail patients had higher risk of serious infections compared to non-frail patients (aHR 2.37, 95% CI 2.05-2.74) which decreased to aHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.13-1.58 (Table 1) after adjusting for comorbidity burden and the HCU. Similarly, frailty was associated with increased risk of any infection (aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.25), and all-cause hospitalizations (aHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.21-1.49) relative to non-frail individuals.Table 1.Multivariable models evaluating the association between frailty status and inpatient infections as the outcomeVariable#Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)@Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)Frail2.37 (2.05, 2.74)1.34 (1.13, 1.58)#Model adjusts for age, sex, major infection requiring inpatient admission in 12 months prior, concomitant baseline drugs such as csDMARDs, glucocorticoids, NSAIDs and opioids@Model additionally adjusts for Chalrson comorbidy score and healthcare utilizationConclusionFrailty is an important predictor for the risk of adverse outcomes among patients with RA treated with b- or tsDMARDs. Our findings underscore the need for considering this parameter in patient evaluations (even among younger patients) in the clinic.References[1]Salaffi F et al: Prevalence of frailty and its associated factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional analysis. Clin Rheumatol 2019[2]Kim DH et al. Validation of a Claims-Based Frailty Index Against Physical Performance and Adverse Health Outcomes in the Health and Retirement Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2019AcknowledgementsI have no acknowledgements to declare.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared
Collapse
|
30
|
Singh N, Peterson A, Baraff A, Chung S, Bhatti P, Coffey D, Barton J, LI C, Smith N, Weiss N. POS1422 USE OF DISEASE MODIFYING ANTI-RHEUMATIC DRUGS AND RISK OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA IN PERSONS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.2168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundBiologic therapies used in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) target several cytokines that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma (MM). Yet little is known about the association between use of biologic or targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b or tsDMARDs) in RA and the incidence of MM.ObjectivesOur objective was to estimate the association between b/tsDMARD use and the risk of MM among persons with RA using Veterans Health Administration (VHA) data. We hypothesized that b-/tsDMARD use is associated with a lower incidence of MM compared with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs).MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients >18 years of age diagnosed with RA in any United States VHA facility from 1/1/2002 and 12/31/2018. All patients met the following inclusion criteria: 1) two or more International Classification of Diseases Version 9 or 10 (ICD9 or ICD10) codes for RA at least 7 days apart but no more than 365 days apart 2) a prescription for a csDMARD within 90 days of the first RA diagnosis 3) one inpatient or outpatient visit 30 days to 2 years preceding first RA diagnosis (indicating a regular user of VHA). Medication data was derived from the outpatient prescription fills, bar coded medication administration (BCMA), and intravenous (IV) data domains. The csDMARDs included in these analyses were: methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, and hydroxychloroquine. The bDMARDs included were tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and non-TNFi biologics such as tocilizumab, rituximab, abatacept, and biosimilars; tsDMARD was tofacitinib. Patients with MM before the diagnosis of RA were excluded. Incident MM was determined by 1 or more ICD9/10 code or ICD-oncology codes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were performed to estimate the hazard ratio for developing MM among those during and following the use of a b-/tsDMARD relative to b-/tsDMARD-naïve persons adjusting for age, gender, race, and ethnicity.Results27,540 veterans with RA met study eligibility criteria, of whom 8,322 (30%) had taken a b-/tsDMARD. Over the study period there were 77 incident MM over a total of 192,000 person years. There were 55 events in users of csDMARDs, an incidence rate (IR) of 0.40 (95% CI 0.30-0.52) per 1000 person-years and 22 in persons currently or formerly using b-/tsDMARDs (IR 0.41, 0.25-0.61 per 1000 person years). The unadjusted hazard ratio for MM following bDMARD use relative to csDMARD only use was 1.04 (0.63, 1.73), which increased to 1.28 (0.76, 2.16) after adjusting for demographic characteristics (Table 1).Table 1.Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model for association between use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and incident multiple myeloma.Clinical characteristicHazards ratio (95% CI)csDMARDReferenceb-/tsDMARD use1.28 (0.76-2.16)Age*1.04 (1.02-1.07)Female0.58 (0.20-1.62)RaceReferenceWhite2.11 (1.15-3.86)Black0.70 (0.10-5.08)OtherHispanic Ethnicity0.71 (0.17-2.92)Abbreviations: b-/tsDMARD- biologic or targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug; CI: confidence interval*Hazards ratio reflects risk per every 1-year increase in ageModel adjusted for age, gender, race, and ethnicityConclusionIn this nationwide VA study, we did not observe an association between bDMARD use and the incidence of MM. Of note, the median interval from initiation of a bDMARD to the end of follow-up was approximately 5.8 years, which does not allow for an examination of a possible longer term influence.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared
Collapse
|
31
|
Carey GB, Ezelle HJ, Steinle N, Cao Q, Simington L, Matson C, Singh N, Jones L, Mohindra P, Cullen KJ, Giglio M, Parker E, Hassel BA. Correction to: Robust Institutional Support and Collaboration Between Summer Training Programs in Cancer and Biomedicine Drive the Pivot to a Virtual Format in Response to the COVID Pandemic. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:872-873. [PMID: 35349108 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-022-02154-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
|
32
|
Mcgrath M, Xue Y, Dillen C, Oldfield L, Assad-garcia N, Zaveri J, Singh N, Baracco L, Taylor L, Vashee S, Frieman M. SARS-CoV-2 Variant Spike and accessory gene mutations alter pathogenesis.. [PMID: 35677080 PMCID: PMC9176647 DOI: 10.1101/2022.05.31.494211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is a major public health crisis. Despite the development and deployment of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, the pandemic persists. The continued spread of the virus is largely driven by the emergence of viral variants, which can evade the current vaccines through mutations in the Spike protein. Although these differences in Spike are important in terms of transmission and vaccine responses, these variants possess mutations in the other parts of their genome which may affect pathogenesis. Of particular interest to us are the mutations present in the accessory genes, which have been shown to contribute to pathogenesis in the host through innate immune signaling, among other effects on host machinery. To examine the effects of accessory protein mutations and other non-spike mutations on SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis, we synthesized viruses where the WA1 Spike is replaced by each variant spike genes in a SARS-CoV-2/WA-1 infectious clone. We then characterized the in vitro and in vivo replication of these viruses and compared them to the full variant viruses. Our work has revealed that non-spike mutations in variants can contribute to replication of SARS-CoV-2 and pathogenesis in the host and can lead to attenuating phenotypes in circulating variants of concern. This work suggests that while Spike mutations may enhance receptor binding and entry into cells, mutations in accessory proteins may lead to less clinical disease, extended time toward knowing an infection exists in a person and thus increased time for transmission to occur.
Collapse
|
33
|
Kesarwani V, Feterman D, Alexander S, Singh N. AB1507 ATTRIBUTES INFLUENCING THE SELECTION OF FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMS BY RHEUMATOLOGY APPLICANTS: A PILOT WEB-BASED SURVEY. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.4146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundRecruitment of candidates is a cost- and effort-intensive aspect of rheumatology fellowship programs. For program leaders to efficiently use the available resources and improve recruitment outcomes, it is imperative to understand the attributes that influence the candidates’ choice of a program. Previous studies have examined the type and relative importance of the factors that candidates use in selecting other fellowship programs (1, 2). However, no such studies have been conducted in the field of rheumatology.ObjectivesTo examine the factors that influence the selection of fellowship programs by rheumatology applicants.MethodsAn anonymous, web-based survey comprised of 13 questions was shared with rheumatology fellowship applicants on messaging applications and online forums. The survey was open from 10/29/2021-11/06/2021. Participation was voluntary and informed consent was implied through the participants’ response. Three reminders to complete the survey were sent. Four domains of the applicant’s perception in relation to their preference of ranking rheumatology programs were assessed: (1) program prestige, (2) program structure, (3) interview day experience, and (4) career path of the alumni. The survey questions were devised in one of the following formats: (1) 5-point Likert scale, (2) rank order questions, (3) yes/no questions, (4) multiple choice questions, and (5) open-ended questions.ResultsThirty-two rheumatology applicants responded to the survey. The prestige of the program was reported to be extremely important by 16%, very important by 19%, somewhat important by 44%, and little or not important by 21% responders. The opportunity to see a diverse patient population was reported to be important by 97% respondents. The call schedule and higher number of fellows were considered important by 88% of the respondents. 66% preferred programs with higher number of faculty members. 69% favored programs with an ultrasound curriculum. The availability of clinician-educator track (18%), MCR/MPH (14%), and T32 grand (4%) were considered less important. 69% reported that the opportunity to train at a Veterans Administration hospital did not influence their choice. Regarding interview day experience, interaction with the faculty (63%) and the fellows (17%) were considered important factors influencing program ranking. Respondents preferred programs with alumni in academic clinician track (45%) and private practice (43%) compared to programs with alumni in academic research (13%) or industry pathway (4%). The geographical location of the program including the cost of living and location of significant others also influenced the applicants’ choice.ConclusionTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey to assess the attributes that influence a candidate’s choice of a rheumatology fellowship program. Our survey demonstrated that a positive interview day experience and program attributes including the opportunity to interact with a diverse patient population, relaxed call schedule, higher number of fellows and faculty, the presence of an ultrasound curriculum, and the location were the dominant factors influencing applicants’ choice of a program. The main limitation of our study is the lack of generalizability due to selection bias. Understanding the factors involved in decision making of the rheumatology fellowship applicants can provide valuable information for both the applicants and the programs and therefore lead to a better match.References[1]Kelm DJ, Skalski JH, Nelson DR, Kashani KB, Lee AS, Wesselius LJ, et al. Attributes Influencing the Selection of Fellowship Programs by Pulmonary and Critical Care Applicants: A Pilot Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(4):572-4.[2]Caiola E, Litaker D. Factors influencing the selection of general internal medicine fellowship programs: a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(9):656-8.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared
Collapse
|
34
|
Carey GB, Ezelle HJ, Steinle N, Cao Q, Simington L, Matson C, Singh N, Jones L, Mohindra P, Cullen KJ, Giglio M, Parker E, Hassel BA. Robust Institutional Support and Collaboration Between Summer Training Programs in Cancer and Biomedicine Drive the Pivot to a Virtual Format in Response to the COVID Pandemic. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:857-871. [PMID: 35098479 PMCID: PMC8801290 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-021-02124-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Summer internships serve important roles in training the next generation of biomedical researchers and healthcare providers through laboratory and clinical experiences that excite trainees about these fields and help them make informed decisions about career paths. The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) pandemic and associated physical distancing restrictions precluded implementation of traditional in-person summer curricula and led to the cancellation of many internships across the USA. COVID-related disruptions also created opportunities for trainees to engage in remote research, become proficient in online learning platforms, and explore multidisciplinary topics. These skills are highly relevant to trainees as virtual interfaces occupy an increasingly mainstream role in their professional paths. The response to the COVID pandemic required real-time adaptations at all levels for major biomedical institutions including the University of Maryland Baltimore (UMB). Pivoting summer programs to a virtual format as part of this response provided a "teachable moment" to expose trainees to the innovation and resilience that are essential components of the biomedical profession. UMB summer programs, which span diverse biomedical disciplines from cancer research to diabetes, consolidated resources and identified mentors with online research projects to develop a robust virtual curriculum. Herein, data from a cancer-focused internship illustrate the collaborative adaptations to established components and creation of new learning modules in the transition to, and implementation of, online training. Outcomes are presented in the context of the COVID pandemic and significant societal issues that arose in the summer of 2020. The utility of virtual components and their impact on future programs is discussed.
Collapse
|
35
|
Singh N, Peterson A, Baraff A, Bhatti P, Gopal A, Smith N, Barton J, Curtis J, LI C, Weiss N. POS1434 USE OF BIOLOGIC OR TARGETED SYNTHETIC DISEASE MODIFYING ANTI-RHEUMATIC DRUGS AND THE RISK OF LYMPHOMA IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.3408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundEpidemiologic studies suggest that disease duration and degree of inflammatory activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) contribute to lymphoma development (1). Whether the decrease in inflammatory burden seen with use of biologic or targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs or tsDMARDs) translates into a lower risk of lymphoma in RA needs to be studied.ObjectivesThe objective of our study was to examine the effect of administration of b/tsDMARDS on the incidence of lymphoma relative to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) in an inception cohort of Veterans with RA.MethodsWe identified patients >18 years of age diagnosed with RA in any US Veterans Affairs (VA) facility from 1/1/2002 and 12/31/2018 using the VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW). To be included, each patient was required to meet the following criteria: 2+ RA diagnostic codes at least 7 days apart but no more than 365 days apart; 2) a prescription for a csDMARD within 90 days of the first RA diagnosis; and 3) an inpatient or outpatient visit 30 days to 2 years preceding first RA diagnosis (indicating they are a regular user of the VA). The csDMARDs included in these analyses were: methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, and hydroxychloroquine. The bDMARDs included were tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and non-TNFi biologics such as tocilizumab, rituximab, abatacept, and biosimilars; tsDMARD was tofacitinib. Patients with prevalent lymphoma were excluded. Lymphoma diagnoses were identified using International Classification of Diseases Version 9, 10 and Oncology (ICD9, ICD10, ICDO) codes.We used marginal structural models as described by Hernan et al (2) and time-varying Cox models to control for confounding by indication while evaluating this association. We adjusted for baseline demographics (age, sex, race, ethnicity, year of cohort entry, rheumatology visits), and time-varying CRP and time-varying Rheumatoid Disease Comorbidity Index (RDCI) (3) to control for confounding.Results27,421 Veterans with RA met our eligibility criteria. Most of the Veterans (56%) were in the age range 61-80 years old; 89% male, 76% White, 14% African American. 8,225 (30%) patients were treated with a b-/tsDMARD. The crude incidence rates were 1.71 (95% CI 1.5-1.94) per 1000 person-years for those only on csDMARDs and 1.78 (95% CI 1.44-2.18) for patients during or following use of a b/tsDMARDs. After adjustment with both time-fixed and time-varying covariates using marginal structural models, the incidence of lymphoma was not different between patients who did and did not use a b/tsDMARD (hazard ratio=1.06, 95% CI= 0.82-1.37) (Table 1).Table 1.Estimates of Effect of bDMARD or tsDMARD use on Lymphoma relative to use of csDMARDsMarginal Structural Models; adjusted for:@Demographics1.04(0.80, 1.34)#Demographics + CRP1.06(0.82, 1.37)* per 1000 person-years@Demographics = age, gender, race, ethnicity, rheumatology visits, and year of cohort entry#Adjusts for CRP, baseline rheumatology visits (yes/no) and RDCI.CRP = C-Reactive Protein, RDCI = Rhematic Disease Comorbidity Index, CI = Confidence Interval, b/tsDMARD = biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD, csDMARD = conventional synthetic DMARDConclusionIn this large study using the nationwide VA data, we did not observe an association between the use of b/ts DMARDs and an increased risk of lymphoma.References[1]Baecklund E, Iliadou A, Askling J, Ekbom A, Backlin C, Granath F, et al. Association of chronic inflammation, not its treatment, with increased lymphoma risk in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(3):692-701.[2]Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2000;11(5):550-60.[3]England BR, Sayles H, Mikuls TR, Johnson DS, Michaud K. Validation of the rheumatic disease comorbidity index. Arthritis care & research. 2015;67(6):865-72.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared
Collapse
|
36
|
Park S, Hippe D, Zawacki L, Bierma M, Bhatia S, Zaba L, Nghiem P, Singh N. AB0307 MERKEL CELL CARCINOMA RECURRENCE RISK IS LOWER IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE THAN IN THOSE WITH OTHER TYPES OF IMMUNE SUPPRESSION. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.3873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is twice as likely to recur in immunosuppressed (IS) patients as in immunocompetent (IC) patients. Iatrogenic IS due to autoimmune disease (AD) may influence prognosis differently than intrinsic IS such as due to hematologic malignancy. Moreover, modification of IS medication may improve prognosis.ObjectivesOur objective was to evaluate the risk of MCC recurrence among patients with AD diseases relative to other immunosuppressive conditions among 762 MCC patients from an Institutional review board-approved registry.MethodsWe categorized patients into 3 groups: IS due to AD (ISAD); IS from other causes (lSnon-AD) such as hematologic malignancy, solid organ transplant, human immunodeficiency virus; or immune competent (n=31, 70, and 661 respectively). ISAD patients were subcategorized into rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (ADRA, n=13) vs. AD except for RA (ADnon-RA, n=18). Descriptive statistics were used to compare the features of different characteristics in each group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to assess the cumulative incidence of recurrence in different patient groups. In order to estimate the associations between baseline patient characteristics and the risk of MCC recurrence, Fine and Gray regression models were used with death as a competing risk for recurrence. The multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, and extent of MCC at initial presentation.ResultsPatients with ISAD had lower stage disease (local disease: 58% vs. 36%, p = 0.003) and smaller primary tumors than ISnon-AD (<= 2 cm: 83% vs. 57%, p=0.023). After adjusting for age, sex, and stage, ISAD patients (ADRA and ADnon-RA) overall had a 54% higher recurrence rate (hazard ratio (HR): 1.54, p=0.21) than IC patients. In comparison, ISnon-AD group had a 165% higher recurrence rate (HR: 2.65, p<0.001) than IC patients (Figure 1). When considered separately, ADRA pts appeared to have a similar recurrence rate as IC pts (HR: 1.19, p=0.76) while ADnon-RA pts had a higher recurrence rate (HR: 1.83, p=0.16) relative to IC pts. At the time of MCC diagnosis, 80% (n=24) of AD pts were on IS medication including conventional disease modifying drugs, biologics, or oral steroids. After MCC diagnosis, 22% (5 patients) stopped all immunosuppressive medications. Among patients on biologics, 89% (8/9 pts) elected to stop the drug. Eleven pts with AD experienced recurrences. Our study was underpowered to demonstrate associations regarding use of a particular immunosuppressive medication and MCC recurrence.Figure 1.Cumulative incidence of Merkel cell carcinoma recurrence in different patient groups.AD = autoimmune disease; IS = immunosuppressed; RA = rheumatoid arthritis.There were 4/13, 8/18, 49/70, and 217/661 recurrences in the RA, ADnon-RA, other immunosuppressed, and not chronically immunosuppressed groups, respectively. Follow-up time ranged from 26 days to 16 years, with median follow-up times of 4.7 years, 1.6 years, 1.6 years, and 3.9 years for the RA, ADnon-RA, other immunosuppressed and not chronically immunosuppressed groups, respectively.ConclusionIn this cohort, pts with AD appeared to have a better prognosis than intrinsic IS, with RA conferring very little risk above that for immune competent pts.AcknowledgementsI have no acknowledgements to declare.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared
Collapse
|
37
|
Guaineri A, Maddalo M, Buglione di Monale e Bastia M, Magrini S, Toraci C, Bossi P, Paderno A, Maroldi R, Ravanelli M, Piazza C, La Mattina S, Facheris G, Volpi G, Singh N, Pastorello E. PO-1086 Head and neck cancer of unknown primary: recurrence pattern based on treatment volumes. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03050-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
38
|
Strand N, Wie C, Peck J, Maita M, Singh N, Dumbroff J, Tieppo Francio V, Murphy M, Chang K, Dickerson DM, Maloney J. Correction to: Small Fiber Neuropathy. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:439. [PMID: 35460493 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01050-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
39
|
Bishop J, Parker CE, Rogachev GV, Ahn S, Koshchiy E, Brandenburg K, Brune CR, Charity RJ, Derkin J, Dronchi N, Hamad G, Jones-Alberty Y, Kokalova T, Massey TN, Meisel Z, Ohstrom EV, Paneru SN, Pollacco EC, Saxena M, Singh N, Smith R, Sobotka LG, Soltesz D, Subedi SK, Voinov AV, Warren J, Wheldon C. Neutron-upscattering enhancement of the triple-alpha process. Nat Commun 2022; 13:2151. [PMID: 35444209 PMCID: PMC9021293 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29848-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The neutron inelastic scattering of carbon-12, populating the Hoyle state, is a reaction of interest for the triple-alpha process. The inverse process (neutron upscattering) can enhance the Hoyle state’s decay rate to the bound states of 12C, effectively increasing the overall triple-alpha reaction rate. The cross section of this reaction is impossible to measure experimentally but has been determined here at astrophysically-relevant energies using detailed balance. Using a highly-collimated monoenergetic beam, here we measure neutrons incident on the Texas Active Target Time Projection Chamber (TexAT TPC) filled with CO2 gas, we measure the 3α-particles (arising from the decay of the Hoyle state following inelastic scattering) and a cross section is extracted. Here we show the neutron-upscattering enhancement is observed to be much smaller than previously expected. The importance of the neutron-upscattering enhancement may therefore not be significant aside from in very particular astrophysical sites (e.g. neutron star mergers). The triple-alpha process plays a role in nucleosynthesis, in the formation of 12C. Here, the authors discuss the rate and role of the neutron upscattering phenomenon on the triple-alpha process in a multi-step process.
Collapse
|
40
|
Strand N, Wie C, Peck J, Maita M, Singh N, Dumbroff J, Tieppo Francio V, Murphy M, Chang K, Dickerson DM, Maloney J. Small Fiber Neuropathy. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:429-438. [PMID: 35384587 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01044-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review aims to summarize advances in the field of small fiber neuropathy made over the last decade, with emphasis on novel research highlighting the distinctive features of SFN. RECENT FINDINGS While the management of SFNs is ideally aimed at treating the underlying cause, most patients will require pain control via multiple, concurrent therapies. Herein, we highlight the most up-to-date information for diagnosis, medication management, interventional management, and novel therapies on the horizon. Despite the prevalence of small fiber neuropathies, there is no clear consensus on guidelines specific for the treatment of SFN. Despite the lack of specific guidelines for SFN treatment, the most recent general neuropathic pain guidelines are based on Cochrane studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which have individually examined therapies used for the more commonly studied SFNs, such as painful diabetic neuropathy and HIV neuropathy. The recommendations from current guidelines are based on variables such as number needed to treat (NNT), safety, ease of use, and effect on quality of life.
Collapse
|
41
|
Huque S, Robinson A, Singh N. 719 THE EFFECT OF LOCKDOWN ON THE INCIDENCE OF VTE IN HIP FRACTURE PATIENTS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. Age Ageing 2022. [PMCID: PMC9383593 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac037.719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We compared the incidence of VTE on a busy hip fracture unit during 2020 with previous years to identify factors that may have played a role in its development.
Methods
Data were retrospectively obtained by notes review for patients admitted with neck or shaft of femur fracture. This included baseline characteristics, comorbidities and operative risk factors for VTE.
Results
11 of 420 patients (2.6%) were diagnosed with VTE in 2020, compared with 25 of 2,115 patients (1.2%) between January 2015 and December 2019 (RR 2.2 [95% CI 1.1 to 4.5, p < 0.05]). Only one patient in 2020 had confirmed COVID-19. Retrospective data between 2015–2019 were incomplete, and so statistical analysis of demographic and operative risk factors was not conducted. Descriptive statistics show there were comparable proportions of smokers and malignancy in both groups, and the majority of patients in both groups received either mechanical or pharmacological VTE prophylaxis. A higher proportion of patients were independently mobile prior to admission in 2020 (72.7% vs 28%). There was a shorter interval to development of VTE in 2020 (mean 12 days in 2020 vs 25 days in 2015–2019).
Conclusion
Following hip fracture surgery patients were twice as likely to develop venous thromboembolism in 2020 than in the previous five years. There was also a shorter time to development of VTE. This was despite a higher reported level of premorbid mobility in 2020 in otherwise similar patient groups. We hypothesise that isolation due to the COVID-19 lockdown contributed to this result. This suggests a need for enhanced vigilance and prompt VTE prophylaxis in this vulnerable population in the event of further pandemic waves and lockdowns.
Collapse
|
42
|
Bala F, Singh N, Moreau F, Field T, Goyal M, Hill M, Coutts S, Almekhlafi M. Prevalence of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease in Patients with Low-Risk Transient or Persistent Neurologic Events. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 43:376-380. [PMID: 35177550 PMCID: PMC8910796 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE There are limited data on the prevalence and outcome of intracranial atherosclerotic disease in patients with low-risk transient or persistent minor neurologic events. We sought to determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with intracranial atherosclerotic disease in patients with low-risk transient or persistent neurologic events. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants with available intracranial vascular imaging from the Diagnosis of Uncertain-Origin Benign Transient Neurologic Symptoms (DOUBT) study, a large prospective multicenter cohort study, were included in this post hoc analysis. The prevalence of intracranial atherosclerotic disease of ≥50% was determined, and the association with baseline characteristics and DWI lesions was evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS We included 661 patients with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range, 53-70 years), of whom 53% were women. Intracranial atherosclerotic disease was found in 81 (12.3%) patients; asymptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease alone, in 65 (9.8%); and symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease, in 16 (2.4%). The most frequent location was in the posterior cerebral artery (29%). Age was the only factor associated with any intracranial atherosclerotic disease (adjusted OR, 1.9 for 10 years increase; 95% CI, 1.6-2.5). Multivariable logistic regression showed a strong association between intracranial atherosclerotic disease and the presence of acute infarct on MR imaging (adjusted OR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.91-6.25). CONCLUSIONS Intracranial atherosclerotic disease is not rare in patients with transient or persistent minor neurologic events and is independently associated with the presence of MR imaging-proved ischemia in this context. Evaluation of the intracranial arteries could be valuable in establishing the etiology of such low-risk events.
Collapse
|
43
|
Singh N, Chow J, Ebadi M, Ma M, Montano-Loza AJ, Bhanji R. A226 SEX-BASED DISPARITY COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING LIVER TRANSPLANTATION. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2022. [PMCID: PMC8859285 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwab049.225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sex-based disparity exists in liver transplantation (LT) with women being disadvantaged at every stage of the process starting from assessment to post transplantation (Bryce et al., 2009). The reasons for this are multifactorial and include biological disparities, psychosocial, and allocation inequalities (Burra et al., 2013). Aims The purpose of this study was to identify differences in immediate or long-term complications post-LT by sex. Methods We analyzed 702 patients who underwent LT at the University of Alberta from 2002 to 2015. Patients aged < 18 years or requiring a repeat or multivisceral transplant were excluded. Renal dysfunction was defined according to the KDIGO criteria. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) was defined as hospitalization for or death from coronary artery disease, cardiac arrest or cerebrovascular disease. Results Male patients comprised 69% of the population. Time on the waitlist was similar for men (9.3 ± 11.7 months) and women (9.9 ± 12.3 months; p=0.57). Both sexes were comparable in age (males: 53 ± 10 years; females: 52 ± 11 years; p=0.19), MELD (males: 18 ± 9; females: 19 ± 10; p=0.16) and BMI (males: 27.7 ± 5.7 kg/m2; females: 27.3 ± 6.6 kg/m2; p=0.58). Women had lower creatinine pre-LT (males: 1.1 ± 0.60 mg/dL; females 0.96 ± 0.51 mg/dL; p<0.01). There were no differences in donor age, sex or BMI. Women had significantly longer hospital length of stay (males: 18 days [IQR: 11, 32]; females: 25 days [IQR: 14, 43]; p <0.001). There was no difference in risk of acute kidney injury (OR 1.4 [95% CI: 0.98, 2.1]; p=0.06), infection (OR 1.1 [95% CI: 0.8, 1.5]; p=0.52) or rejection episodes (OR 1.1 [95% CI: 0.8, 1.5]; p=0.74) following LT. Women had a higher risk of CKD post-LT (OR 2.3 [95% CI: 1.6, 3.2]; p<0.0001). There was no difference in de-novo diabetes (males: 22%; females: 16%; p=0.10), hypertension (males: 45%; females: 48%; p=0.41), dyslipidemia (males: 37%; females: 39%; p=0.67) and CVD (males: 20%; females: 19%; p=0.84) post-LT. Graft (males: 11.4 ± 0.4 years; females: 11.8 ± 0.5 years; p=0.32) and patient survival (males: 11.8 ± 0.4 years; females: 12.4 ± 0.5 years; p=0.18) were similar over a median follow up of 6.3 years [IQR: 3.5, 9.9]. Conclusions Women spend a longer time in hospital and are at an increased risk of CKD following LT. Despite these differences, overall graft and patient survival are comparable. Our data suggest the disparity between sexes likely exists pre-LT and females that undergo LT have similar outcomes to their male counterparts. ![]()
Funding Agencies None
Collapse
|
44
|
Hollings M, Mavros Y, Kay S, Anderberg K, Baker M, Wang Y, Zhao R, Meiklejohn J, Climstein M, O'Sullivan A, De Vos N, Baune B, Blair S, Simar D, Singh N, Fiatarone Singh M. Metformin Impairs the Cardiorespiratory Fitness Adaptation to High-Intensity Power Training in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the GREAT2DO Randomised Controlled Trial. Heart Lung Circ 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
45
|
Hollings M, Mavros Y, Sharma P, Kay S, Anderberg K, Baker M, Wang Y, Zhao R, Meiklejohn J, Climstein M, O'Sullivan A, De Vos N, Baune B, Blair S, Singh N, Fiatarone Singh M. High Intensity Power Training Improves Ambulatory Blood Pressure for Hypertensive Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the GREAT2DO Randomised Controlled Trial. Heart Lung Circ 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.06.501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
46
|
Taylor JA, Burnell M, Ryana A, Karpinskyj C, Kalsi JK, Taylor H, Apostolidou S, Sharma A, Manchanda R, Woolas R, Campbell S, Parmar M, Singh N, Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A. Association of hysterectomy and invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer: a cohort study within UKCTOCS. BJOG 2022; 129:110-118. [PMID: 34555263 PMCID: PMC7615389 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between hysterectomy with conservation of one or both adnexa and ovarian and tubal cancer. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Thirteen NHS Trusts in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. POPULATION A total of 202 506 postmenopausal women recruited between 2001 and 2005 to the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) and followed up until 31 December 2014. METHODS Multiple sources (questionnaires, hospital notes, Hospital Episodes Statistics, national cancer/death registries, ultrasound reports) were used to obtain accurate data on hysterectomy (with conservation of one or both adnexa) and outcomes censored at bilateral oophorectomy, death, ovarian/tubal cancer diagnosis, loss to follow up or 31 December 2014. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the association. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer (WHO 2014) on independent outcome review. RESULTS Hysterectomy with conservation of one or both adnexa was reported in 41 912 (20.7%; 41 912/202 506) women. Median follow up was 11.1 years (interquartile range 9.96-12.04), totalling >2.17 million woman-years. Among women who had undergone hysterectomy, 0.55% (231/41 912) were diagnosed with ovarian/tubal cancer, compared with 0.59% (945/160 594) of those with intact uterus. Multivariable analysis showed no evidence of an association between hysterectomy and invasive epithelial ovarian/tubal cancer (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.85-1.13, P = 0.765). CONCLUSIONS This large cohort study provides further independent validation that hysterectomy is not associated with alteration of invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer risk. These data are important both for clinical counselling and for refining risk prediction models. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Hysterectomy does not alter risk of invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer.
Collapse
|
47
|
Johnson G, Vergis A, Unger B, Park J, Gillman L, Hickey K, Pace D, Azin A, Guidolin K, Lam-Tin-Cheung K, Chadi S, Quereshy F, Guidolin K, Catton J, Rubin B, Bell J, Marangos J, Heesters A, Stuart-McEwan T, Quereshy F, Shariff F, Wright F, Ahmed N, Nadler A, Hallet J, Gentles J, Chen L, Hwang H, Parapini M, Hirpara D, Sidhu R, Scott T, Karimuddin A, Guo R, Nguyen A, Osborn J, Wiseman S, Nabata K, Ertel E, Hwang H, Lenet T, Baker L, Park L, Vered M, Zahrai A, Shorr R, Davis A, McIsaac D, Tinmouth A, Fergusson D, Martel G, Nabata K, Rummel S, Stefic-Cubic M, Karimuddin A, Stewart M, Melck A, McKechnie T, Anpalagan T, Ichhpuniani S, Lee Y, Ramji K, Eskicioglu C, Zhu A, Deng S, Greene B, Tsang M, Palter V, Jayaraman S, McKechnie T, Mann A, Tittley J, Cadeddu M, Nguyen M, Madani A, Pasternak J, McKechnie T, Ramji K, Hong D, Qu L, Istl A, Tang E, Gray D, Zuckerman J, Coburn N, Callum J, McLeod R, Pearsall E, Lin Y, Turgeon A, Martel G, Hallet J, Mahar A, Kammili A, Kriviraltcheva-Kaneva P, Lee L, Cools-Lartigue J, Ferri L, Mueller C, Zuckerman J, Haas B, Tillman B, Guttman M, Chesney T, Zuk V, Mahar A, Hsu A, Chan W, Vasdev R, Coburn N, Hallet J, D'Souza K, Huynh C, Ling LCJ, Warburton R, Hwang H, Hameed M, Glass L, Williamson H, Murphy P, Tang E, Leslie K, Hawel J, Kerr L, Zablotny S, Roldan H, He W, Jiang X, Zheng B, Lee L, Fiore J, Feldman L, Fried G, Mueller C, Valanci S, Balvardi S, Cipolla J, Kaneva P, Demyttenaere S, Boutros M, Lee L, Feldman L, Fiore J, Balvardi S, Alhashemi M, Cipolla J, Lee L, Fiore J, Feldman L, Miles A, Purich K, Verhoeff K, Shapiro J, Bigam D, Kung J, Fecso A, Chesney T, Mosko J, Skubleny D, Hamilton P, Ghosh S, Widder S, Schiller D, Do U, El Kefraoui C, Pook M, Barone N, Balvardi S, Montgomery H, Nguyen-Powanda P, Rajabiyazdi F, Elhaj H, Lapointe-Gagner M, Olleik G, Kaneva P, Antoun A, Safa N, Di Lena E, Meterissian S, Meguerditchian A, Fried G, Alhashemi M, Lee F, Baldini G, Feldman L, Fiore J, Serrano Aybar PE, Parpia S, Ruo L, Tywonek K, Lee S, O'Neill C, Faisal N, Alfayyadh A, Gundayao M, Meyers BM, Habashi R, Kruse C, McKechnie T, Levin M, Aldrich K, Grantcharov T, Langerman A, Forbes H, Anantha R, Fawcett V, Hetherington A, Pravong V, Gervais M, Rakovich G, Selvam R, Hu R, Musselman R, Raiche I, Moloo H, Liu R, Elnahas A, Alkhamesi N, Hawel J, Tang E, Alnumay A, Schlachta C, Walser E, Zhang C, Cristancho S, Ott M, Lee A, Niu B, Balaa F, Gawad N, Ren K, Qiu Y, Hamann K, How N, Leveille C, Davidson A, Eqbal A, Sardiwalla Y, Korostensky M, McKechnie T, Lee E, Yang I, Ren K, Muaddi H, Stukel T, de Mestral C, Nathens A, Karanicolas P, Frigault J, Lemieux S, Breton D, Bouchard P, Bouchard A, Grégoire R, Letarte F, Bouchard G, Drolet S, Frigault J, Avoine S, Drolet S, Letarte F, Bouchard A, Gagné J, Thibault C, Grégoire R, Jutras Bouthillette N, Gosselin M, Bouchard P, Rosenzveig A, Stuleanu T, Jarrar A, Kolozsvari N, Skelhorne-Gross G, Nenshi R, Jerath A, Gomez D, Singh K, Amir T, Liu E, Farquharson S, Mao R, Lan L, Yan J, Allard-Coutu A, Mierzwa A, Tin R, Brisebois R, Bradley N, Wigen R, Walser E, Hartford L, Van Koughnett J, Vogt K, Hilsden R, Parry N, Allen L, Leslie K, Raskin R, Jones J, Neumann K, Dwyer C, Strickland M, Bradley N, O'Dochartaigh D, Lobay K, Kabaroff A, Chang E, Widder S, Anantha R, Sun W, Beck J, Anantha R, Liu R, Davidson J, Jones S, Van Hooren T, Van Koughnett J, Ott M, Schmitz E, Raiche I, Sun W, El Hafid M, Dang J, Mocanu V, Lutzak G, Sultanian R, Wong C, Karmali S, Schmitz E, Petrera M, Pickell M, Auer R, Patro N, Li B, Lee Y, Wilson H, Mocanu V, Sun W, Dang J, Jogiat U, Kung J, Switzer N, Karmali S, Wong C, Li C, Al Hinai A, Cieply A, Hawes H, Joos E, Saleh A, Li C, Saleh A, Engels P, Drung J, Allen L, Leslie K, Pang G, Kwong M, Schlachta C, Alkhamesi N, Hawel J, Elnahas A, Guidolin K, Ellsmere J, Chadi S, Quereshy F, Chang D, Hutter M, Spence R, Abou Khalil M, Boutros M, Vasilevsky C, Morin N, Longtin Y, Liberman S, Demyttenaere S, Montpetit P, Poirier M, Mukherjee K, Sebajang H, Younan R, Schwenter F, De Broux E, Larsen K, Skelhorne-Gross G, Beckett A, Nantais J, Gomez D, Lan L, Mao R, Kay J, Lohre R, Ayeni O, Goel D, de Sa D, He R, Hylton D, Bedard E, Johnson S, Laing B, Valji A, Hanna W, Turner S, Akhtar-Danesh G, Akhtar-Danesh N, Shargall Y, Akhtar-Danesh G, Akhtar-Danesh N, Shargall Y, Hirpara D, Gupta V, Kidane B, Limbachia J, Sullivan K, Farrokhyar F, Leontiadis G, Patel Y, Churchill I, Hylton D, Xie F, Seely A, Spicer J, Kidane B, Turner S, Yasufuku K, Hanna W, Jogiat U, Sun W, Dang J, Mocanu V, Kung J, Karmali S, Turner S, Switzer N, Patel Y, Churchill I, Sullivan K, Beauchamp M, Wald J, Mbuagbaw L, Agzarian J, Shargall Y, Finley C, Fahim C, Hanna W, Abbas M, Olaiya O, Begum H, Mbuagbaw L, Finley C, Hanna W, Agzarian J, Shargall Y, Ednie A, Palma D, Warner A, Malthaner R, Fortin D, Qiabi M, Nayak R, Nguyen T, Louie A, Rodrigues G, Yaremko B, Laba J, Inculet R, Alaichi J, Patel Y, Hanna W, Turner S, Mador B, Lai H, White J, Kim M, Hirpara D, Kidane B, Louie A, Zuk V, Darling G, Rousseau M, Chesney T, Coburn N, Hallet J, Lee Y, Samarasinghe Y, Lee M, Thiru L, Shargall Y, Finley C, Hanna W, Levine O, Juergens R, Agzarian J, Nayak R, Brogly S, Li W, Lougheed D, Petsikas D, Mistry N, Gatti A, Churchill I, Patel Y, Hanna W, Abdul S, Anestee C, Gilbert S, Sundaresan S, Seely A, Villeneuve P, Maziak D, Razzak R, Ashrafi A, Tregobov N, Hassanzadeh N, Stone S, Panjwani A, Bong T, Bond R, Hafizi A, De Meo M, Rayes R, Milette S, Vagai M, Usatii M, Chandrasekaran A, Giannias B, Bourdeau F, Sangwan V, Bertos N, Moraes C, Huang S, Quail D, Walsh L, Camilleri-Broet S, Fiset P, Cools-Lartigue J, Ferri L, Spicer J, Kammili A, Bilgic E, Quaiattini A, Maurice-Ventouris M, Najmeh S, Mueller C, Esther L, Begum H, Agzarian J, Hanna W, Finley C, Shargall Y, Lee Y, Lu J, Malhan R, Shargall Y, Finley C, Hanna W, Agzarian J, Brophy S, Brennan K, French D, Resende V, Momtazi M, Solaja O, Gilbert S, Maziak D, Seely A, Sundaresan S, Villeneuve P, Sisson D, Donahoe L, Bedard P, Hansen A, De Perrot M, Alghamedi A, Simone A, Begum H, Hanna W, Shargall Y, Turner S, Huang J, Lai H, Bedard E, Shargall Y, Murthy S, Lin J, Darling G, Malthaner R, Kidane B, Seely A, Li H, Crowther M, Linkins L, Lau E, Schneider L, Hanna W, Finley C, Agzarian J, Douketis J, Greenberg B, Gupta V, Allen-Avodabo C, Davis L, Zhao H, Kidane B, Darling G, Coburn N, Huynh C, Cools-Lartigue J, Ferri L, Najmeh S, Sirois C, Mulder D, Spicer J, Al Rawahi A, Aftab Abdul S, Nguyen D, Anstee C, Delic E, Gilbert S, Maziak D, Villeneuve P, Seely A, Sisson D, Sasewich H, Islam T, Low D, Darling G, Turner S, Humer M, Abdul S, Nguyen D, Al Rawahi A, Anstee C, Delic E, Gilbert S, Villeneuve P, Maziak D, Seely A, Le Nguyen D, Aftab Abdul S, Al Rawahi A, Anstee C, Delic E, Gilbert S, Villeneuve P, Maziak D, Seely A, Patel Y, Kay M, Churchill I, Sullivan K, Shargall Y, Shayegan B, Adili A, Hanna W, Kaafarani M, Huynh C, Chouiali F, Muthukrishnan N, Maleki F, Ovens K, Gold M, Sorin M, Falutz R, Rayes R, Forghani R, Spicer J, Hunka N, Kennedy R, Bigsby R, Bharadwaj S, Gowing S, Churchill I, Gatti A, Hylton D, Sullivan K, Patel Y, Farrokhyar F, Leontiadis G, Hanna W, Finley C, Begum H, Pearce K, Agzarian J, Hanna W, Shargall Y, Akhtar-Danesh N, Jones D, Anstee C, Kumar S, Gingrich M, Simone A, Ahmadzai Z, Thavorn K, Seely A, Gupta V, Namavarian A, Mohammed A, Uddin S, Jones D, Behzadi A, Brar A, Qu L, Qiabi M, Nayak R, Malthaner R, Peters E, Buduhan G, Tan L, Liu R, Srinathan S, Kidane B, Gupta V, Levy J, Kidane B, Mahar A, Ringash J, Sutradhar R, Darling G, Coburn N, Robinson M, Bednarek L, Buduhan G, Liu R, Tan L, Srinathan S, Kidane B, Wang H, French D, MacDonald D, Graham K, Enns S, Buduhan G, Srinathan S, Liu R, Tan A, Kidane B, Bruinooge A, Poole E, Pascoe C, Karakach T, Buduhan G, Tan L, Srinathan S, Halayko A, Kidane B, Verhoeff K, Mocanu V, Fang B, Dang J, Kung J, Switzer N, Birch D, Karmali S, Johnson G, Singh H, Vergis A, Park J, Hershorn O, Hochman D, Helewa R, Johnson G, Robertson R, Vergis A, Johnson G, Vergis A, Singh H, Park J, Helewa R, Azin A, Cahill C, Lipson M, Afzal A, Maclean A, Wong C, Roen S, Buie W, McKechnie T, Anpalagan T, Chu M, Lee Y, Amin N, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, McKechnie T, Ramji K, Kruse C, Jaffer H, Rebello R, Amin N, Doumouras A, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, Hajjar R, Oliero M, Cuisiniere T, Fragoso G, Calvé A, Djediai S, Annabi B, Richard C, Santos M, Purich K, Zhou Y, Dodd S, Ring B, Yuan Y, White J, Garfinkle R, Dell'Aniello S, Bhatnagar S, Morin N, Ghitulescu G, Faria J, Vasilevsky C, Brassard P, Boutros M, Garfinkle R, Salama E, Amar-Zifkin A, Morin N, Ghitulescu G, Faria J, Vasilevsky C, Boutros M, Talwar G, Daniel R, McKechnie T, Levine O, Eskicioglu C, AlSulaim H, Alqahtani M, Garfinkle R, Al-Masrouri S, Vasilevsky C, Morin N, Boutros M, McKechnie T, Chen A, Patel A, Lee Y, Doumouras A, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, Brissette V, Al Busaidi N, Rajabiyazdi F, Moon J, Demian M, Vasilevsky C, Morin N, Boutros M, Selvam R, Moloo H, MacRae H, Alam F, Raiche I, Holland J, Cwintal M, Rigas G, Vasilevsky C, Morin N, Ghitulescu G, Faria J, Pang A, Boutros M, Holland J, Moon J, Marinescu D, Morin N, Ghitulescu G, Pang A, Vasilevsky C, Boutros M, Brown C, Karimuddin A, Raval M, Phang P, Ghuman A, Li M, Muncner S, Mihajlovic I, Dykstra M, Snelgrove R, Wang H, Monton O, Smith A, Moon J, Demian M, Garfinkle R, Vasilevsky C, Rajabiyazdi F, Boutros M, AlAamer O, AlSelaim N, AlMalki M, Al-Osail A, Ruxton R, Manuel P, Mohamed F, Motamedi MK, Serahati S, Rajendran L, Brown C, Raval M, Karimuddin A, Ghuman A, Phang T, Caminsky N, Moon J, Rajabiyazdi F, Chadi S, Alavi K, Paquette I, MacLean T, Wexner S, Liberman S, Steele S, Park J, Patel S, Bordeianou L, Auer R, Sylla P, Morin N, Ghuman A, Boutros M, Bayat Z, Kennedy E, Victor C, Govindarajan A, Liang J, Vasilevsky C, Pang A, Ghitulescu G, Faria J, Morin N, Boutros M, Marinescu D, Roy H, Baig Z, Karimmudin A, Raval M, Brown C, Phang T, Gill D, Ginther N, Moon J, Marinescu D, Pang A, Ghitulescu G, Faria J, Morin N, Vasilevsky C, Boutros M, Moon J, Pang A, Ghitulescu G, Faria J, Morin N, Vasilevsky C, Boutros M, Salama E, Alrashid F, Vasilevsky C, Ghitulescu G, Faria J, Morin N, Boutros M, Wiseman V, Zhang L, MacDonald P, Merchant SM, Wattie Barnett K, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Patel SV, Harra Z, Vasilevsky C, Ghitulescu G, Morin N, Boutros M, Pang A, Hegagi M, Alqahtani M, Morin N, Ghitulescu G, Vasilevsky C, Boutros M, Alghaithi N, Marinescu D, Al-Masrouri S, Pang A, Vasilevsky C, Boutros M, Papillon E, Kasteel N, Kaur G, Bindra S, Malhotra A, Graham C, MacLean A, Beck P, Jijon H, Ferraz J, Buie W, Szwimer R, Moon J, Demian M, Pang A, Morin N, Vasilevsky C, Rajabiyazdi F, Boutros M, Azin A, Merchant S, Kong W, Gyawali B, Hanna T, Chung W, Nanji S, Patel S, Booth C, Li V, Awan A, Serrano P, Jacobson M, Chanco M, Wen V, Singh N, Peiris L, Pasieka J, Ghatage P, Buie D, MacLean T, Bouchard-Fortier A, Mack L, Marini W, Zheng W, Swallow C, Reedijk M, DiPasquale A, Peiris L, Prus-Czrnecka Z, Delmar L, Gagnon N, Villiard R, Martel É, Cadrin-Chênevert A, Ledoux É, Racicot C, Mysuria S, Bazzarelli A, Pao J, Chen L, Zhang M, McKevitt E, Warburton R, Kuusk U, Van Laeken N, Bovill E, Isaac K, Dingee C, Hunter-Smith A, Cuthbert C, Fergus K, Barbera L, Efegoma Y, Howell D, Isherwood S, Levasseur N, Scheer A, Simmons C, Srikantham A, Temple-Orberle C, Xu Y, Metcalfe K, Quan M, Alqaydi A, la J, Merchant S, Digby G, Pravong V, Brind'Amour A, Sidéris L, Dubé P, De Guerke L, Fortin S, Auclair M, Trilling B, Tremblay J, Di Lena É, Hopkins B, Wong S, Meterissian S, Di Lena É, Barone N, Hopkins B, Dumitra S, Kaneva P, Fiore J, Meterissian S, Mysuria S, McKevitt E, Warburton R, Chen L, Bazzarelli A, Pao J, Bovill E, Zhang M, Kuusk U, Isaac K, Van Laeken N, Dingee C, Kapur H, McKevitt E, Warburton R, Pao J, Dingee C, Bazarelli A, Kuusk U, Chen L, Cadili L, DeGirolamo K, McKevitt E, Pao J, Dingee C, Bazzarelli A, Warburton R, Ng D, Ali A, Eymae D, Lee K, Brar S, Conner J, Magalhaes M, Swallow C, Allen K, Baliski C, Cyr D, Sari A, Messenger D, Driman D, Assarzadegan N, Juda A, Swallow C, Kennedy E, Brar M, Conner J, Kirsch R, Allard-Coutu A, Singh K, Lamontagne A, Gamache Y, Allard-Coutu A, Mardinger C, Lee C, Duckworth R, Brindle M, Fraulin F, Austen L, Kortbeek J, Hyndman M, Nguyen D, Jamjoum G, Meguerditchian A, Langer S, Yuan Xu Y, Kong S, Quan M, Lim D, Retrouvey H, Kerrebijn I, Butler K, O'Neill A, Cil T, Zhong T, Hofer S, McCready D, Metcalfe K, Lim D, Greene B, Look Hong N, Parapini M, Skipworth J, Mah A, Desai S, Chung S, Scudamore C, Segedi M, Vasilyeva E, Li J, Kim P, Verhoeff K, Deprato A, Purich K, Kung J, Bigam D, Dajani K, Lenet T, Gilbert R, Smoot R, Martel G, Tzeng C, Rocha F, Yohanathan L, Cleary S, Bertens K, Reyna-Sepulveda F, Badrudin D, Gala-Lopez B, Hanna N, Brogly S, Wei X, Booth C, Nanji S, Zuckerman J, Coburn N, Mahar A, Callum J, Kaliwal Y, Jayaraman S, Wei A, Martel G, Hallet J, Zuckerman J, Jayaraman S, Wei A, Mahar A, Kaliwal Y, Martel G, Coburn N, Hallet J, Henault D, Barrette B, Pelletier S, Thebault P, Beaudry-Simoneau E, Rong Z, Plasse M, Dagenais ARM, Létourneau R, Lapointe R, Vandenbroucke-Menu F, Nguyen B, Soucy G, Turcotte S, Lemke M, Waugh E, Leslie K, Quan D, Skaro A, Tang E, Lund M, Allen L, Glinka J, Jada G, Quan D, Skaro A, Tang E, Park L, Daza J, Li V, Msallak H, Zhang B, Workneh A, Faisal S, Faisal R, Fabbro M, Gu C, Claassen M, Zuk V, Hallet J, Martel G, Sapisochin G, Serrano P, Glinka J, Skaro A, Leslie K, Jada G, Quan D, Tang E, Waugh E, Lemke M, Glinka J, Skaro A, Leslie K, Tang E, Waugh E, Breadner D, Liu R, Tang E, Allen L, Welch S, Skaro A, Leslie K, Glinka J, Waugh E, Tang E, Jada G, Quan D, Skaro A, Webb A, Lester E, Shapiro A, Eurich D, Bigam D, Essaji Y, Shrader H, Nayyar A, Suraju M, Williams-Perez S, Ear P, Chan C, Smith V, Rivers-Bowerman M, Costa A, Stueck A, Campbell N, Allen S, Gala-Lopez B, Gilbert R, Lenet T, Cleary S, Smoot R, Tzeng C, Rocha F, Martel G, Bertens K, Mir Z, Golding H, McKeown S, Nanji S, Flemming J, Groome P, Mir Z, Djerboua M, Nanji S, Flemming J, Groome P, Elbekri S, Turcotte S, Girard E, Morency-Potvin P, Lapointe R, Vandenbroucke-Menu F, Dagenais M, Roy A, Letourneau R, Plasse M, Simoneau E, Rong Z, Zuker N, Oakley M, Chartrand G, Misheva B, Bendavid Y, Frigault J, Lemieux S, Breton D, Bouchard G, Drolet S, Melland-Smith M, Smith L, Tan J, Kahn U, McLean C, Mocanu V, Birch D, Karmali S, Switzer N, Fortin M, Paré X, Doyon A, Keshavjee S, Schwenger K, Yadav J, Fischer S, Jackson T, Allard J, Okrainec A, Lee Y, Anvari S, Chu M, Lovrics O, Aditya I, Malhan R, Khondker A, Walsh M, Doumouras A, Hong D, He W, Vergis A, Hardy K, Romanescu R, Deaninck F, Linton J, Fowler-Woods M, Fowler-Woods A, Shingoose G, Vergis A, Hardy K, Zmudzinski M, Cloutier Z, McKechnie T, Lee Y, Archer V, Doumouras A, Shiroky J, Abu Halimah J, Ramji K, Boudreau V, Mierzwa A, Mocanu V, Marcil G, Dang J, Switzer N, Birch D, Karmali S, Mierzwa A, Jarrar A, Hardy-Henry A, Kolozsvari N, Lin W, Hagen J, Connell M, Sun W, Dang J, Mocanu V, Kung J, Switzer N, Birch D, Karmali S. 2021 Canadian Surgery Forum01. Design and validation of a unique endoscopy simulator using a commercial video game03. Is ethnicity an appropriate measure of health care marginalization?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of diabetic foot ulceration in the Aboriginal population04. Racial disparities in surgery — a cross-specialty matched comparison between black and white patients05. Starting late does not increase the risk of postoperative complications in patients undergoing common general surgical procedures06. Ethical decision-making during a health care crisis: a resource allocation framework and tool07. Ensuring stability in surgical training program leadership: a survey of program directors08. Introducing oncoplastic breast surgery in a community hospital09. Leadership development programs for surgical residents: a review of the literature10. Superiority of non-opioid postoperative pain management after thyroid and parathyroid operations: a systematic review and meta-analysis11. Timing of ERCP relative to cholecystectomy in patients with ductal gallstone disease12. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intraoperative red blood cell transfusion strategies13. Postoperative outcomes after frail elderly preoperative assessment clinic: a single-institution Canadian perspective14. Selective opioid antagonists following bowel resection for prevention of postoperative ileus: a systematic review and meta-analysis15. Peer-to-peer coaching after bile duct injury16. Laparoscopic median arcuate ligament release: a video abstract17. Retroperitoneoscopic approach to adrenalectomy19. Endoscopic Zenker diverticulotomy: a video abstract20. Variability in surgeons’ perioperative management of pheochromocytomas in Canada21. The contribution of surgeon and hospital variation in transfusion practice to outcomes for patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a population-based analysis22. Perioperative transfusions for gastroesophageal cancers: risk factors and short- and long-term outcomes23. The association between frailty and time alive and at home after cancer surgery among older adults: a population-based analysis24. Psychological and workplace-related effects of providing surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia, Canada25. Safety of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic review26. Complications and reintervention following laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis27. Synchronization of pupil dilations correlates with team performance in a simulated laparoscopic team coordination task28. Receptivity to and desired design features of a surgical peer coaching program: an international survey9. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rates of emergency department utilization due to general surgery conditions30. The impact of the current COVID-19 pandemic on the exposure of general surgery trainees to operative procedures31. Association between academic degrees and research productivity: an assessment of academic general surgeons in Canada32. Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for subepithelial gastric lesion: a video presentation33. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute care general surgery at an academic Canadian centre34. Opioid-free analgesia after outpatient general surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial35. Impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy or targeted therapies on surgical resection in patients with solid tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis37. Surgical data recording in the operating room: a systematic review of modalities and metrics38. Association between nonaccidental trauma and neighbourhood socioeconomic status during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective analysis39. Laparoscopic repair of a transdiaphragmatic gastropleural fistula40. Video-based interviewing in medicine: a scoping review41. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for prevention of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a cost analysis from the hospital payer’s perspective43. Perception or reality: surgical resident and faculty assessments of resident workload compared with objective data45. When illness and loss hit close to home: Do health care providers learn how to cope?46. Remote video-based suturing education with smartphones (REVISE): a randomized controlled trial47. The evolving use of robotic surgery: a population-based analysis48. Prophylactic retromuscular mesh placement for parastomal hernia prevention: a retrospective cohort study of permanent colostomies and ileostomies49. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a retrospective cohort study on anastomotic complications50. A lay of the land — a description of Canadian academic acute care surgery models51. Emergency general surgery in Ontario: interhospital variability in structures, processes and models of care52. Trauma 101: a virtual case-based trauma conference as an adjunct to medical education53. Assessment of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator for predicting patient-centred outcomes of emergency general surgery patients in a Canadian health care system54. Sustainability of a narcotic reduction initiative: 1 year following the Standardization of Outpatient Procedure (STOP) Narcotics Study55. Barriers to transanal endoscopic microsurgery referral56. Geospatial analysis of severely injured rural patients in a geographically complex landscape57. Implementation of an incentive spirometry protocol in a trauma ward: a single-centre pilot study58. Impostor phenomenon is a significant risk factor for burnout and anxiety in Canadian resident physicians: a cross-sectional survey59. Understanding the influence of perioperative education on performance among surgical trainees: a single-centre experience60. The effect of COVID-19 pandemic on current and future endoscopic personal protective equipment practices: a national survey of 77 endoscopists61. Case report: delayed presentation of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis as necrotizing infection of the lower limb62. Investigating disparities in surgical outcomes in Canadian Indigenous populations63. Fundoplication is superior to medical therapy for Barrett esophagus disease regression and progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis64. Development of a novel online general surgery learning platform and a qualitative preimplementation analysis65. Hagfish slime exudate as a potential novel hemostatic agent: developing a standardized assessment protocol66. The effect of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical oncology case volumes and wait times67. Safety of same-day discharge in high-risk patients undergoing ambulatory general surgery68. External validation of the Codman score in colorectal surgery: a pragmatic tool to drive quality improvement69. Improved morbidity and gastrointestinal restoration rates without compromising survival rates for diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage versus total abdominal colectomy for fulminant Clostridioides difficile colitis: a multicentre retrospective cohort study70. Potential access to emergency general surgical care in Ontario71. Immersive virtual reality (iVR) improves procedural duration, task completion and accuracy in surgical trainees: a systematic review01. Clinical validation of the Canada Lymph Node Score for endobronchial ultrasound02. Venous thromboembolism in surgically treated esophageal cancer patients: a provincial population-based study03. Venous thromboembolism in surgically treated lung cancer patients: a population-based study04. Is frailty associated with failure to rescue after esophagectomy? A multi-institutional comparative analysis of outcomes05. Routine systematic sampling versus targeted sampling of lymph nodes during endobronchial ultrasound: a feasibility randomized controlled trial06. Gastric ischemic conditioning reduces anastomotic complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis07. Move For Surgery, a novel preconditioning program to optimize health before thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled trial08. In case of emergency, go to your nearest emergency department — Or maybe not?09. Does preoperative SABR increase the risk of complications from lung cancer resection? A secondary analysis of the MISSILE trial10. Segmental resection for lung cancer: the added value of near-infrared fluorescence mapping diminishes with surgeon experience11. Toward competency-based continuing professional development for practising surgeons12. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus surgery in older adults with NSCLC — a population-based, matched analysis of long-term dependency outcomes13. Role of adjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy and curative esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis14. Evaluation of population characteristics on the incidence of thoracic empyema: an ecological study15. Determining the optimal stiffness colour threshold and stiffness area ratio cut-off for mediastinal lymph node staging using EBUS elastography and AI: a pilot study16. Quality assurance on the use of sequential compression stockings in thoracic surgery (QUESTs)17. The relationship between fissureless technique and prolonged air leak for patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy18. CXCR2 inhibition as a candidate for immunomodulation in the treatment of K-RAS-driven lung adenocarcinoma19. Assessment tools for evaluating competency in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a systematic review20. Understanding the current practice on chest tube management following lung resection among thoracic surgeons across Canada21. Effect of routine jejunostomy tube insertion in esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis22. Recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax following bullectomy with pleurodesis or pleurectomy: a retrospective analysis23. Surgical outcomes following chest wall resection and reconstruction24. Outcomes following surgical management of primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumours25. Does robotic approach offer better nodal staging than thoracoscopic approach in anatomical resection for non–small cell lung cancer? A single-centre propensity matching analysis26. Competency assessment for mediastinal mass resection and thymectomy: design and Delphi process27. The contemporary significance of venous thromboembolism (deep venous thrombosis [DVT] and pulmonary embolus [PE]) in patients undergoing esophagectomy: a prospective, multicentre cohort study to evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes of VTE after major esophageal resections28. Esophageal cancer: symptom severity at the end of life29. The impact of pulmonary artery reconstruction on postoperative and oncologic outcomes: a systematic review30. Association with surgical technique and recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia: a single-centre experience31. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in esophagectomy32. Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: trends in surgical approach and early mortality at a single institution over the past 18 years34. Adverse events and length of stay following minimally invasive surgery in paraesophageal hernia repair35. Long-term symptom control comparison of Dor and Nissen fundoplication following laparoscopic para-esophageal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis36. Willingness to pay: a survey of Canadian patients’ willingness to contribute to the cost of robotic thoracic surgery37. Radiomics in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: a prediction tool for tumour immune microenvironments38. Effectiveness of intraoperative pyloric botox injection during esophagectomy: how often is endoscopic intervention required?39. An artificial intelligence algorithm for predicting lymph node malignancy during endobronchial ultrasound40. The effect of major and minor complications after lung surgery on length of stay and readmission41. Measuring cost of adverse events following thoracic surgery: a scoping review42. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: characterization by hospital and surgeon volume and impact on outcomes43. NSQIP 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index predicts morbidity but not mortality after esophagectomy44. Trajectory of perioperative HRQOL and association with postoperative complications in thoracic surgery patients45. Variation in treatment patterns and outcomes for resected esophageal cancer at designated thoracic surgery centres46. Patient-reported pretreatment health-related quality of life (HRQOL) predicts short-term survival in esophageal cancer patients47. Analgesic efficacy of surgeon-placed paravertebral catheters compared with thoracic epidural analgesia after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a retrospective noninferiority study48. Rapid return to normal oxygenation after lung surgery49. Examination of local and systemic inflammatory changes during lung surgery01. Implications of near-infrared imaging and indocyanine green on anastomotic leaks following colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis02. Repeat preoperative endoscopy after regional implementation of electronic synoptic endoscopy reporting: a retrospective comparative study03. Consensus-derived quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery (TES)04. Colorectal lesion localization practices at endoscopy to facilitate surgical and endoscopic planning: recommendations from a national consensus Delphi process05. Black race is associated with increased mortality in colon cancer — a population-based and propensity-score matched analysis06. Improved survival in a cohort of patients 75 years and over with FIT-detected colorectal neoplasms07. Laparoscopic versus open loop ileostomy reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis08. Posterior mesorectal thickness as a predictor of increased operative time in rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study09. Improvement of colonic anastomotic healing in mice with oral supplementation of oligosaccharides10. How can we better identify patients with rectal bleeding who are at high risk of colorectal cancer?11. Assessment of long-term bowel dysfunction in rectal cancer survivors: a population-based cohort study12. Observational versus antibiotic therapy for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis: a noninferiority meta-analysis based on a Delphi consensus13. Radiotherapy alone versus chemoradiotherapy for stage I anal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis14. Is the Hartmann procedure for diverticulitis obsolete? National trends in colectomy for diverticulitis in the emergency setting from 1993 to 201515. Sugammadex in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis16. Sexuality and rectal cancer treatment: a qualitative study exploring patients’ information needs and expectations on sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment17. Video-based interviews in selection process18. Impact of delaying colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer detection and prevention19. Opioid use disorder associated with increased anastomotic leak and major complications after colorectal surgery20. Effectiveness of a rectal cancer education video on patient expectations21. Robotic-assisted rectosigmoid and rectal cancer resection: implementation and early experience at a Canadian tertiary centre22. An online educational app for rectal cancer survivors with low anterior resection syndrome: a pilot study23. The effects of surgeon specialization on the outcome of emergency colorectal surgery24. Outcomes after colorectal cancer resections in octogenarians and older in a regional New Zealand setting — What are the predictors of mortality?25. Long-term outcomes after seton placement for perianal fistulae with and without Crohn disease26. A survey of patient and surgeon preference for early ileostomy closure following restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer — Why aren’t we doing it?27. Crohn disease independently associated with longer hospital admission after surgery28. Short-stay (≤ 1 d) diverting loop ileostomy closure can be selectively implemented without an increase in readmission and complication rates: an ACS-NSQIP analysis29. A comparison of perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection and the Altemeier procedure at 2 Canadian academic hospitals30. Mental health and substance use disorders predict 90-day readmission and postoperative complications following rectal cancer surgery31. Early discharge after colorectal cancer resection: trends and impact on patient outcomes32. Oral antibiotics without mechanical bowel preparation prior to emergency colectomy reduces the risk of organ space surgical site infections: a NSQIP propensity score matched study33. The impact of robotic surgery on a tertiary care colorectal surgery program, an assessment of costs and short-term outcomes — a Canadian perspective34. Should we scope beyond the age limit of guidelines? Adenoma detection rates and outcomes of screening and surveillance colonoscopies in patients aged 75–79 years35. Emergency department admissions for uncomplicated diverticulitis: a nationwide study36. Obesity is associated with a complicated episode of acute diverticulitis: a nationwide study37. Green indocyanine angiography for low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective before-and-after study38. The impact of age on surgical recurrence of fibrostenotic ileocolic Crohn disease39. A qualitative study to explore the optimal timing and approach for the LARS discussion01. Racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in diagnosis, treatment and survival of patients with breast cancer: a SEER-based population analysis02. First-line palliative chemotherapy for esophageal and gastric cancer: practice patterns and outcomes in the general population03. Frailty as a predictor for postoperative outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy04. Synoptic electronic operative reports identify practice variation in cancer surgery allowing for directed interventions to decrease variation05. The role of Hedgehog signalling in basal-like breast cancer07. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes in oncoplastic breast conservation surgery from a single surgeon’s practice in a busy community hospital in Canada08. Upgrade rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia: 10 years of experience and predictive factors09. Time to first adjuvant treatment after oncoplastic breast reduction10. Preparing to survive: improving outcomes for young women with breast cancer11. Opioid prescription and consumption in patients undergoing outpatient breast surgery — baseline data for a quality improvement initiative12. Rectal anastomosis and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Should we avoid diverting loop ileostomy?13. Delays in operative management of early-stage, estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic — a multi-institutional matched historical cohort study14. Opioid prescribing practices in breast oncologic surgery15. Oncoplastic breast reduction (OBR) complications and patient-reported outcomes16. De-escalating breast cancer surgery: Should we apply quality indicators from other jurisdictions in Canada?17. The breast cancer patient experience of telemedicine during COVID-1918. A novel ex vivo human peritoneal model to investigate mechanisms of peritoneal metastasis in gastric adenocarcinoma (GCa)19. Preliminary uptake and outcomes utilizing the BREAST-Q patient-reported outcomes questionnaire in patients following breast cancer surgery20. Routine elastin staining improves detection of venous invasion and enhances prognostication in resected colorectal cancer21. Analysis of exhaled volatile organic compounds: a new frontier in colon cancer screening and surveillance22. A clinical pathway for radical cystectomy leads to a shorter hospital stay and decreases 30-day postoperative complications: a NSQIP analysis23. Fertility preservation in young breast cancer patients: a population-based study24. Investigating factors associated with postmastectomy unplanned emergency department visits: a population-based analysis25. Impact of patient, tumour and treatment factors on psychosocial outcomes after treatment in women with invasive breast cancer26. The relationship between breast and axillary pathologic complete response in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer01. The association between bacterobilia and the risk of postoperative complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy02. Surgical outcome and quality of life following exercise-based prehabilitation for hepatobiliary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis03. Does intraoperative frozen section and revision of margins lead to improved survival in patients undergoing resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis04. Prolonged kidney procurement time is associated with worse graft survival after transplantation05. Venous thromboembolism following hepatectomy for colorectal metastases: a population-based retrospective cohort study06. Association between resection approach and transfusion exposure in liver resection for gastrointestinal cancer07. The association between surgeon volume and use of laparoscopic liver resection for gastrointestinal cancer08. Immune suppression through TIGIT in colorectal cancer liver metastases09. “The whole is greater than the sum of its parts” — a combined strategy to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy10. Laparoscopic versus open synchronous colorectal and hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer11. Identifying prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with recurrent disease following liver resection for colorectal cancer metastasis12. Modified Blumgart pancreatojejunostomy with external stenting in laparoscopic Whipple reconstruction13. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single centre’s initial experience with introduction of a novel surgical approach14. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a single-centre cohort analysis15. Thermal ablation and telemedicine to reduce resource utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic16. Cost-utility analysis of normothermic machine perfusion compared with static cold storage in liver transplantation in the Canadian setting17. Impact of adjuvant therapy on overall survival in early-stage ampullary cancers: a single-centre retrospective review18. Presence of biliary anaerobes enhances response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma19. How does tumour viability influence the predictive capability of the Metroticket model? Comparing predicted-to-observed 5-year survival after liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma20. Does caudate resection improve outcomes in patients undergoing curative resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis21. Appraisal of multivariable prognostic models for postoperative liver decompensation following partial hepatectomy: a systematic review22. Predictors of postoperative liver decompensation events following resection in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: a population-based study23. Characteristics of bacteriobilia and impact on outcomes after Whipple procedure01. Inverting the y-axis: the future of MIS abdominal wall reconstruction is upside down02. Progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum: a single-centre retrospective study03. The role of radiologic classification of parastomal hernia as a predictor of the need for surgical hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study04. Comparison of 2 fascial defect closure methods for laparoscopic incisional hernia repair01. Hypoalbuminemia predicts serious complications following elective bariatric surgery02. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band migration inducing jejunal obstruction associated with acute pancreatitis: aurgical approach of band removal03. Can visceral adipose tissue gene expression determine metabolic outcomes after bariatric surgery?04. Improvement of kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease and severe obesity after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis05. A prediction model for delayed discharge following gastric bypass surgery06. Experiences and outcomes of Indigenous patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a mixed-methods scoping review07. What is the optimal common channel length in revisional bariatric surgery?08. Laparoscopic management of internal hernia in a 34-week pregnant woman09. Characterizing timing of postoperative complications following elective Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy10. Canadian trends in bariatric surgery11. Common surgical stapler problems and how to correct them12. Management of choledocholithiasis following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Surg 2021; 64:S80-S159. [PMID: 35483046 PMCID: PMC8677574 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.021321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
48
|
Cooper GS, Shankar B, Rich KM, Ratna NN, Alam MJ, Singh N, Kadiyala S. Can fruit and vegetable aggregation systems better balance improved producer livelihoods with more equitable distribution? WORLD DEVELOPMENT 2021; 148:105678. [PMID: 34866757 PMCID: PMC8520944 DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
The need for food systems to generate sustainable and equitable benefits for all is a global imperative. However, whilst ample evidence exists linking smallholder farmer coordination and aggregation (i.e. the collective transport and marketing of produce on behalf of multiple farmers) to improved market participation and farmer incomes, the extent to which interventions that aim to improve farmer market engagement may co-develop equitable consumer benefits remains uncertain. This challenge is pertinent to the horticultural systems of South Asia, where the increasing purchasing power of urban consumers, lengthening urban catchments, underdeveloped rural infrastructures and inadequate local demands combine to undermine the delivery of fresh fruits and vegetables to smaller, often rural or semi-rural markets serving nutritionally insecure populations. To this end, we investigate the potential for aggregation to be developed to increase fruit and vegetable delivery to these neglected smaller markets, whilst simultaneously improving farmer returns. Using an innovative system dynamics modelling approach based on an aggregation scheme in Bihar, India, we identify potential trade-offs between outcomes relating to farmers and consumers in smaller local markets. We find that changes to aggregation alone (i.e. scaling-up participation; subsidising small market transportation; mandating quotas for smaller markets) are unable to achieve significant improvements in smaller market delivery without risking reduced farmer participation in aggregation. Contrastingly, combining aggregation with the introduction of market-based cold storage and measures that boost demand improves fruit and vegetable availability significantly in smaller markets, whilst avoiding farmer-facing trade-offs. Critically, our study emphasises the benefits that may be attained from combining multiple nutrition-sensitive market interventions, and stresses the need for policies that narrow the fruit and vegetable cold storage deficits that exist away from more lucrative markets in developing countries. The future pathways and policy options discovered work towards making win-win futures for farmers and disadvantaged consumers a reality.
Collapse
|
49
|
Cimflova P, McDonough R, Kappelhof M, Singh N, Kashani N, Ospel JM, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Chen M, Sakai N, Fiehler J, Goyal M. Perceived Limits of Endovascular Treatment for Secondary Medium-Vessel-Occlusion Stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42:2188-2193. [PMID: 34711552 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Thrombus embolization during mechanical thrombectomy occurs in up to 9% of cases, making secondary medium vessel occlusions of particular interest to neurointerventionalists. We sought to gain insight into the current endovascular treatment approaches for secondary medium vessel occlusion stroke in an international case-based survey because there are currently no clear recommendations for endovascular treatment in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Survey participants were presented with 3 cases involving secondary medium vessel occlusions, each consisting of 3 case vignettes with changes in the patient's neurologic status (improvement, no change, unable to assess). Multivariable logistic regression analyses clustered by the respondent's identity were used to assess factors influencing the decision to treat. RESULTS In total, 366 physicians (56 women, 308 men, 2 undisclosed) from 44 countries provided 3294 responses to 9 scenarios. Most (54.1%, 1782/3294) were in favor of endovascular treatment. Participants were more likely to treat occlusions in the anterior M2/3 (74.3%; risk ratio = 2.62; 95% CI, 2.27-3.03) or A3 (59.7%; risk ratio = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.83-2.42) segment compared with the M3/4 segment (28.3%; reference). Physicians were less likely to pursue endovascular treatment in patients who showed neurologic improvement than in patients with an unchanged neurologic deficit (49.9% versus 57.0% responses in favor of endovascular treatment, respectively; risk ratio = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.83-0.92). Interventionalists and more experienced physicians were more likely to treat secondary medium vessel occlusions. CONCLUSIONS Physicians' willingness to treat secondary medium vessel occlusions endovascularly is limited and varies per occlusion location and change in neurologic status. More evidence on the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for secondary medium vessel occlusion stroke is needed.
Collapse
|
50
|
Cutshall H, Amerson C, Singh N, Hattaway R, Rais-Bahrami S, McCleskey B. Impacts of the Virtual Landscape During the COVID-19 Pandemic on the 2020 Application Cycle. Am J Clin Pathol 2021. [PMCID: PMC8574506 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab191.246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction/Objective In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2020 application cycle adapted to a mostly virtual setting. This project focused on the impact of these changes on the 2020 application cycle with the elimination of in- person away rotations and interviews, as well as the implementation of new virtual opportunities for learning and interacting with residents and programs. Methods/Case Report This study was conducted through an anonymous survey sent out to programs that engaged in social media usage in the 2020 application cycle. The survey was made available to program directors, faculty, residents and the matched applicants and focused on their usage and opinion of impact of virtual opportunities, virtual interviews and social media encounters. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) A total of 17 program directors/faculty, 17 residents and 19 matched applicants completed the survey across 91 programs surveyed. Virtual opportunities that were offered across these programs include: open houses, sub-internships, didactic lectures, grand rounds, Q&A sessions, and virtual facility tours. Responses showed that 4 programs (16%) moved applicants up on their rank list based on pre-interview virtual interactions. From the applicant perspective, 13 (76.5%) said virtual opportunities impacted the way they evaluated programs with 13 (68.4%) ranking programs higher and 3 (15.7%) ranking programs they otherwise would not have ranked. On the other hand, 21 faculty/residents (80.7%) felt that applicants missed out on fully experiencing the program due to lack of in person interviews and away rotations. However, 14 programs (56%) interviewed more candidates and offered more interview days during the 2020 application cycle. Applicants also applied to a greater number of programs with 42% of surveyed applicants applying to more than 50 programs, however none attended more than 30 interviews. Conclusion In conclusion, adaptations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have provided an unexpected opportunity to explore the impact of the virtual landscape on residency recruitment.
Collapse
|