WJ, Brufsky AM, Wapnir IL, Suga JM, Mamounas E(T, Wolmark N. Abstract OT2-16-05: Safety Analyses of NRG BR004: A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase III Trial of Taxane/Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab with Atezolizumab or Placebo in First-line HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)

Background: The CLEOPATRA trial established trastuzumab, pertuzumab and a taxane (THP) as a standard of care for first line metastatic, HER2-positve breast cancer with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 18.7 months and median OS of 57 months. NRG BR004 was a phase III, placebo-controlled trial designed to determine whether the addition of the PD-L1 inhibitor, atezolizumab, to THP would improve progression-free survival (PFS), relative to THP/placebo in patients with newly documented HER2-positive measurable metastatic breast cancer.

Methods: BR004 was designed to detect an improvement in the primary endpoint of PFS in patients with measurable disease from 16.5 to 22.5 months with addition of atezolizumab (HR 0.733). A sample size of 600 would provide 80% power with a type I error rate of 0.05 to detect such an improvement when 326 PFS events had been reported. Monthly accrual was projected at 30 patients per month with completion of accrual in 24 months. In addition to routine monitoring of safety data by the IDMC every 6 months, a formal analysis of the toxicity data was to be performed 16 weeks after the 100th patient had been randomized with review by the IDMC.

Results: First patient was randomized on May 1, 2019, and after 37 months 190 patients had been randomized. Several amendments were not successful in addressing the low accrual rate. The IDMC began regular monitoring of safety and accrual data in July 2020 and reviewed the formal safety analysis in February 2022. As of the February 2022 IDMC meeting, four Grade 5 adverse events (AEs) had been reported (2 occurring in 2020 and 2 in 2021), one of which occurred in a patient with evolving liver failure due to rapid disease progression at the start of therapy. The recommendation was to continue without modification, but notice was given the Grade 5 AEs had occurred on the same treatment arm without unblinding. When additional Grade 5 AEs occurred on 3/4/2022 and 4/27/2022 both on the same study arm with none reported on the other arm, accrual was held until the IDMC could review updated safety data, narratives of the Grade 5 AEs and the overall context of the trial. There was no evidence of clinically important imbalances between Grade 3 and Grade 4 AEs between the arms., Based on an uncertain but material safety signal, the ongoing accrual challenges, and determination that the clinical question being addressed was no longer sufficiently compelling, the IDMC recommended that the trial should be permanently closed to further enrollment. Summary safety data from 187 treated patients are provided in the Table. A decision was made to discontinue atezolizumab/placebo in patients receiving the investigational component of the trial therapy and unblind investigators and patients. The study will continue to collect information on PFS events, deaths and late immune AEs through April of 2024 when PFS and OS will be analyzed.

Conclusions: The imbalance in Grade 5 AEs which occurred on BR004 coupled with continued poor accrual and the changing landscape in HER2+ MBC resulted in early closure of enrollment and unblinding of patients. Follow-up continues to assess PFS, OS and monitor for delayed immune AEs.

Support: U10CA180868, -189867, -180822; U24CA196067; and Genentech.

NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610: Colorectal Cancer Metastatic dMMR Immuno-Therapy (COMMIT) study—A randomized phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy versus mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezo in the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

TPS258

Background: Despite the superiority in progression-free survival (PFS) of inhibition of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway in dMMR/MSI-H as compared to chemotherapy with either anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFr) or anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibodies in mCRC, more pts had progressive disease as the best response in the anti-PD1 monotherapy arm (29.4% v 12.3%) with mean PFS of 13.7 mos, with ~45% of pts in the immunotherapy arm progressed at 12 mos (KEYNOTE 177). We hypothesize that dMMR/MSI-H mCRC pts may be more effectively treated with the combination of PD-1 pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-1 therapy (atezo) alone. Preclinical work demonstrated synergistic effects between anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF and between oxaliplatin/anti-PD-1 in murine CRC models and phase II data, which showed activity of anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF in chemotherapy refractory colon cancer. A recent randomized trial subgroup analysis of 8 pts with dMMR metastatic colon cancer treated with FOLFOXIRI+bev+atezo, with the first patient having progression ~16 mos (AtezoTRIBE). Additionally, in other solid tumor malignancies, anti-PD1 plus anti-VEGFr (i.e., HCC and RCC) as well as anti-PD1 plus chemotherapy (i.e., gastric and esophageal cancers) combinations are standard first-line treatments. Methods: The redesigned COMMIT study was reactivated on 1/29/2021 as a two-arm prospective phase III open-label trial randomizing (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H to atezo monotherapy v mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Assuming our control arm, atezo monotherapy (48% PFS at 24 mos as assessed by site investigator), we have 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.6 (equivalent to 64.4% PFS at 24 mos) with alpha 0.025 one-sided. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Secondary endpoints include OS, objective response rate, safety profile, disease control rate, and duration of response. Health-related quality of life is an exploratory objective. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Key inclusion criteria are: mCRC without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; and measurable disease per RECIST. Enrollment actively continues to the target accrual of 211 patients randomized between the two immunotherapy arms. Clinical trial: NCT02997228. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, -180888, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067; Genentech, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT05080673 .

Phase II/III study of circulating tumor DNA as a predictive biomarker in adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer: NRG-GI005 (COBRA)

TPS259

Background: Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) shed into the bloodstream represents a highly specific and sensitive approach for identifying microscopic or residual tumor cells after surgical resection. For patients (pts) with colon cancer (CC), the detection of ctDNA is associated with persistent disease after resection and outperforms traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. However, for pts with stage II CC, there are currently no validated biomarkers predicting benefit in identifying pts whose residual disease cancer be cleared by adjuvant chemotherapy. We hypothesize that for pts whose stage II colon cancer has been resected and who have no traditional high-risk features, a positive ctDNA status may identify those who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III clinical trial, pts (N=1,408) with resected stage II CC without traditional high-risk features and whom the evaluating oncologist deems suitable for active surveillance (i.e., not needing adjuvant chemotherapy) will be randomized 1:1 into 2 arms: standard-of-care/observation (Arm A), or prospective testing for ctDNA (Arm B). Postoperative blood will be analyzed for ctDNA with the Guardant Reveal assay, covering CC-relevant mutations and CC-specific methylation profiling. Pts in Arm B with ctDNA detected will be treated with 6 months of adjuvant (FOLFOX) chemotherapy. For all pts in Arm A, ctDNA status will be analyzed retrospectively at the time of endpoint analysis. The primary endpoints are clearance of ctDNA with adjuvant chemotherapy (phase II) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for “ctDNA-detected” pts treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (phase III). Secondary endpoints will include time-to-event outcomes (OS, RFS, TTR) by ctDNA marker status and treatment, prevalence of detectable ctDNA in stage II CC, and rates of compliance with assigned intervention. Archived normal and matched tumor and blood samples will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Enrollment continues across North America to the 540-patient phase II endpoint. Support: U10CA180868, -180822; UG1CA189867; GuardantHealth. Clinical trial information: NCT04068103 .

NSABP C-14: CORRECT-MRD II—Second colorectal cancer clinical validation study to predict recurrence using a circulating tumor DNA assay to detect minimal residual disease

TPS284

Background: Detectable ctDNA after resection of early-stage solid tumors has been associated with very high risk of recurrence, suggesting ctDNA is evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD). Several studies are ongoing to investigate the role of ctDNA in the optimal management of pts with colorectal cancer using different assay technologies. Methods: This is a prospective, observational, multicenter study in the United States and Canada of 750 patients who have undergone complete surgical resection for stage II or III colorectal cancer, who have FFPE tissue available from the primary resection sufficient for a novel bespoke MRD assay and are willing to provide serial whole blood specimens for ctDNA analysis. Participants are asked to provide study specimens after definitive surgical resection, pre-recurrence follow-up, and clinical recurrence (if applicable). Recently amended eligibility criteria include inclusion of rectal cancer patients who have completed neo-adjuvant therapy and surgical resection, as well as enrollment of all stage II and III patients regardless of microsatellite stability status. The Oncotype Colon Recurrence Score will be assessed on all patients from their surgical specimen if criteria are met for this testing. ctDNA will be analyzed with an NGS-based tumor-informed MRD assay that identifies somatic genomic alterations from DNA derived from the patient’s tumor tissue, subtracts germline variants, and detects a selected subset of tumor-specific (bespoke) ctDNA in their blood. All primary tumor specimens will undergo full exome and transcriptome sequencing using the Oncomap ExTra assay. If there is evidence of disease recurrence, the metastatic tissue will also undergo Oncomap ExTra testing, which will be shared with participants. The primary objective is to validate the association of post-definitive therapy and pre-recurrence follow-up ctDNA positivity with recurrence-free interval (RFI). Further objectives are to assess the: sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA positivity for subsequent clinical recurrence; contribution of post-surgery baseline, post-adjuvant therapy, and pre-recurrence follow-up ctDNA results on RFI; time from positive ctDNA to clinical recurrence in participants who had a positive ctDNA result; and compare the Oncotype Colon Recurrence Score estimate of 3-year recurrence risk with the observed 3-year recurrence rate. The primary analysis will use a Cox proportional hazards regression applied to the RFI with ctDNA result (positive or negative) measured at post-surgical baseline (or end of adjuvant therapy if used) and serially after that as a single, time-dependent covariate. Protocol#: NSABP C-14 / ES 16-002. Support: NSABP Foundation, ExactSciences Clinical trial information: 05210283 .

Long-term results from NRG-GI002: A phase II clinical trial platform using total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)

7

Background: This NCTN multi-arm randomized phase II modular clinical trial platform utilizes TNT with parallel experimental arms (EAs) in LARC. EAs are not intended for direct comparison, but rather to concurrently randomized control arm (CA) patients. Primary endpoint (EP) and available secondary EPs (from EA1 using veliparib [V], PARPi; and EA2 using pembrolizumab [P], anti-PD-1) have been previously reported. We present long-term outcomes of all pts enrolled (NCT02921256). Methods: Stage II/III pts with MSS LARC (with any ONE of the following: distal location [cT3-4 ≤5cm from anal verge, any N]; bulky [any cT4 or tumor within 3mm of mesorectal fascia]; high risk for metastatic disease [cN2]; or not a sphincter-sparing surgery [SSS] candidate) were randomized to CA (neoadjuvant FOLFOX [x 4mo] → chemoRT [capecitabine with 50.4Gy] → surgery 8-12 wks later). EA1 added V (400mg PO BID) and EA2 added P (200mg IV Q3 wks x 6 doses) each concurrent with chemoRT. Primary EP: 4-point reduction in Neoadjuvant Rectal Cancer (NAR) score with a one-sided α=0.10, 80% power. NAR compared by linear model controlling for clinical T4 at entry (Y/N). Secondary EPs: OS, DFS. p-values are two-sided. Results: From 10/2016-2/2018, 178 pts were randomized (88 CA, 90 EA1). From 8/2018-5/2019, 185 pts were randomized (95 CA, 90 EA2). Baseline characteristics were previously reported. Median follow-up is 3.50 yrs for the 1st comparison. Median follow-up is 3.15 yrs for the 2nd comparison. Updated primary and long-term secondary outcomes are in the table. Conclusions: With longer follow-up, addition of V to TNT provided no significant differences in the NAR score or 3yr outcomes. The addition of P to TNT was associated with a statistically significant improvement in 3yr OS, but not DFS. Correlative molecular analyses are ongoing. Support: U10CA180868, -180822; UG1-189867; U24-196067; AbbVie; Merck. Clinical trial information: NCT02921256 . [Table: see text]

NRG GI008: Colon adjuvant chemotherapy based on evaluation of residual disease (CIRCULATE-US)

TPS260

Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage III A, B (all pts) and stage II, IIIC (ctDNA+ only) CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera™, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP) + oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines vs . serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively or with serial monitoring (Cohort B) will be randomized to FP+Ox vs . more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate vs . delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox vs FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June, 2022. Support: U10-CA-180868, -180822; UG1CA-189867; Natera, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

Adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with HER2-negative residual invasive disease in KATHERINE

Following chemotherapy and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-targeted neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive early breast cancer, residual invasive breast cancer at surgery may be HER2-negative on retesting in some patients. We evaluated outcomes with T-DM1 and trastuzumab in patients randomized in the phase III KATHERINE trial based on HER2-positive central testing of the pre-treatment core biopsy with HER2-negative central testing on their corresponding surgical specimen after neoadjuvant treatment. In the 70/845 (8.3%) patients with HER2-negative residual disease on retesting at surgery, there were 11 IDFS events in the 42 trastuzumab-treated patients (26.2%) and none in the 28 T-DM1-treated patients, suggesting that T-DM1 should not be withheld in this patient population.

NRG-BR007: A phase III trial evaluating de-escalation of breast radiation (DEBRA) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) of stage 1, hormone receptor+, HER2-, RS ≤18 breast cancer

TPS613

Background: Approximately 50% of newly diagnosed breast cancers are stage 1, with the majority being ER/PR-positive, HER2-negative. Genomic assays such as the Oncotype DX® have identified patients (pts) with reduced risk of distant metastasis and without benefit from chemotherapy added to endocrine therapy, freeing them from excess toxicity. Genomic assays are also recognized as prognostic for in-breast recurrence (IBR) after BCS and could similarly allow de-escalation of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Reducing overtreatment is of interest to pts, providers, and payers. Methods: We hypothesize that BCS alone is non-inferior to BCS plus RT for in-breast recurrence and breast preservation in women intending endocrine therapy (ET) for stage 1 breast cancer (ER &/or PR positive, HER2-negative with an Oncotype DX Recurrence Score [RS] of ≤18). Stratification is by age (<60; ≥60), tumor size (≤1 cm; >1-2cm), & (RS <11, RS 11-18). Pts are randomized post-BCS to Arm 1 with breast RT using standard methods (hypo- or conventional-fractionated whole breast RT with/without boost, APBI) with ≥5 yrs of ET (tamoxifen or AI) or Arm 2 with ≥5 yrs of ET (tamoxifen or AI) alone. The specific regimen of ET in both arms is at the treating physician’s discretion. Eligible pts are stage 1: pT1 (2 cm), pN0, age ≥50 to <70 yrs, s/p BCS with negative margins (no ink on tumor), s/p axillary nodal staging (SNB or ALND), ER &/or PR positive (ASCO/CAP), HER2-negative (ASCO/CAP), and Oncotype DX RS of ≤18 (diagnostic core biopsy or resected specimen). Primary endpoint is in-breast recurrence. Secondary endpoints are breast conservation rate, invasive in-breast recurrence, relapse-free interval, distant disease-free survival, overall survival, patient-reported breast pain, patient-reported worry about recurrence, and adherence to ET. We assume a clinically acceptable difference in of 4% at 10 yrs to judge omission of RT as non-inferior (10-yr event-free survival for RT group is 95.6% vs 91.6% for the omission of RT group). The study is powered to detect a non-inferiority with 80% power and a one-sided α=0.025, assuming that there would be a ramp-up in accrual in the first two years (leveling off in Yrs 3-5); 1,670 (835 per arm) pts are required to be randomized. Conservative loss to follow-up is 1% per yr. Some of the T1a pts screened may have Oncotype DX scores >18, making them ineligible for the study. In the accrual process, pts will be required to register (1,714 pts) to ensure that our final randomized cohort is 1,670 pts. Current accrual (2-2-2022) is 52 screened and 45 randomized. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, NCT04852887. Clinical trial information: NCT04852887.

NSABP FC-11: A phase II study of neratinib (N) plus trastuzumab (T) or N plus cetuximab (C) in patients (pts) with "quadruple wild-type" metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on HER2 status

3564

Background: Patients (pts) with KRAS wild-type (WT) mCRC treated with single agent anti-EGFR therapy (tx) have improved OS compared to BSC but only a 10-15% response rate. Prior EGFR tx may upregulate HER amplification. For pts with quadruple WT mCRC (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIC3KA), data suggest that dual targeting of the MAPK pathway, specifically EGFR and HER2, may be more effective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity of dual MAPK pathway inhibition based on HER2 status: amplified (amp), non-amplified (non-amp), or mutated (mt). Methods: This 2-arm phase II trial enrolled pts with quad WT mCRC with ECOG PS 0-2, adequate organ function, prior oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based regimens, and known HER2 status. Arm 1: HER2 amp (confirmed as >2.14 copy number by Guardant 360) and prior anti-EGFR tx or HER2 mt (with qualifying mt) with or without prior anti-EGFR tx; Arm 2: HER2 non-amp or HER2 amp without prior anti-EGFR tx. Tx included T 4 mg/kg IV loading dose → 2 mg/kg/wk and N 240 mg po daily (Arm 1) or C 400 mg/m2 IV loading dose → 250 mg/m2/wk and N 240 mg po daily (Arm 2). Imaging was performed every 8 wks with response per RECIST 1.1. Primary end point (EP) of each arm was 6 mo PFS (PFS6). Secondary EPs: Response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), toxicity and exploratory assessments of N pharmacokinetics, genetic and molecular analyses, and evaluation of multiple drug combinations in PDX/PDXO models. We tested H0: PFS6 <0.13 v HA: PFS6 >0.47 (α=0.05; power=0.90 to reject HA). Treating 15 pts in each arm, if ≥5 pts are alive and progression free (PFS6 0.33), the arm is worth further testing. Results: From Jul 2018 - Mar 2021, 25 pts enrolled from 9 different centers. Arm 1 closed due to poor accrual (n=4). Those pts have been excluded from further analysis. Arm 2 enrolled 21 pts. with 15 evaluable for response by imaging. Early discontinuation occurred in 6 of 21 pts: 2 withdrew consent, 3 due to toxicity, and 1 physician withdrawal. Of the 15 evaluable pts, there were 6 PR, 5 of 13 HER2 non-amp, 1 of 2 HER2 amp, (duration 120-171 days; mean 140) and 5 SD (duration 59-231 days; mean 124). The ORR (CR/PR) in all pts who received at least one dose of tx is 33% (6/20). 8 of 15 evaluable pts (53%) were progression free at cycle 6. Common grade 3+ AEs (>5%) included diarrhea (24%), rash (8%), and abdominal pain/distension (8%), without any grade 5 AEs. Conclusions: The combination of C+N was reasonably well tolerated with expected toxicities of diarrhea and rash. The ORR, CBR, and PFS compare favorably to pts previously relapsed following oxaliplatin and irinotecan and treated with single-agent anti-EGFR tx. Upon entry, biopsies for PDX implantation had an engraftment success rate of ̃80%. We anticipate using these grafts to establish PDXO models for molecular analyses and further drug testing. Support: NSABP Foundation, Puma Biotechnology. Clinical trial information: NCT03457896.

Colon adjuvant chemotherapy based on evaluation of residual disease (CIRCULATE-US): NRG-GI008

TPS3643

Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage III A, B (all pts) and stage II, IIIC (ctDNA+ only) CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor informed assay (SignateraTM, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP) + oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines vs . serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively or with serial monitoring (Cohort B) will be randomized to FP+Ox vs . more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) in phase III in the immediate vs . delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox vs FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, post-operative and serial matched/normal blood samples will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in early 2022. Support: U10-CA-180868, -180822; UG1CA-189867; Clinical trial information: NCT05174169.

NSAB C-14: CORRECT-MRD II—Second colorectal cancer clinical validation study to predict recurrence using a circulating tumor DNA assay to detect minimal residual disease

TPS3632

Background: Patients (pts) with stage II and III colon cancer (CC) have unique post-operative decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). There is a subset of stage II pts with defined clinicopathologic features associated with poor prognosis who may benefit from ACT, although more discriminating and objective predictors of benefit are needed. In addition, there may be a subset of Stage III CC pts who could tolerate a de-escalation of ACT or who may require intensification of ACT to improve clinical outcome. Detectable ctDNA after resection of early-stage solid tumors has been associated with very high risk of recurrence, suggesting ctDNA is evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD). Several studies are ongoing to investigate the role of ctDNA in the optimal management of pts with CC using different assay technologies. Methods: This is a prospective, observational, multicenter study in the United States and Canada of 750 pts who have undergone complete surgical resection for stage II or III CC, have FFPE tissue available from the primary resection sufficient for a novel bespoke MRD assay, and are willing to provide serial whole blood specimens for ctDNA analysis. Subjects are asked to provide study specimens at baseline, pre-recurrence follow-up, and clinical recurrence (if applicable) study visits. ctDNA will be analyzed with an NGS-based MRD assay that identifies somatic genetic alterations from DNA derived from the pt’s tumor tissue, subtracts germline variants, and detects a subset of these tumor-specific (bespoke) ctDNA in the pt’s blood. The primary objective is to validate the association of post-definitive therapy and pre-recurrence follow-up ctDNA positivity with recurrence-free interval (RFI). Further objectives are to assess the: sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA positivity for subsequent clinical recurrence; contribution of post-surgery baseline, post-adjuvant therapy, and pre-recurrence follow-up ctDNA results on RFI; time from positive ctDNA to clinical recurrence in subjects who had a positive ctDNA result; and compare the Oncotype Colon Recurrence Score estimate of 3 yr recurrence risk with the observed 3 yr recurrence rate. The primary analysis will use a Cox proportional hazards regression applied to the RFI with ctDNA result (positive or negative) measured at post-surgical baseline (or end of ACT if ACT was used) and serially after that as a single, time-dependent covariate. Protocol: 16-002/NSABP C-14. Support: NSABP Foundation. Clinical trial information: 05210283.

Testing of a machine learning (ML) model for ability to predict oxaliplatin and bevacizumab (bev) benefit in NRG Oncology/NSABP C-07 and C-08

3607

Background: Through mining The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and a large set of transcriptomes of CRC in GEO, we constructed 15 metagenes reflecting the transcriptomic impact of major driver genes of CRC. Independent of any clinical information, we used metagenes as features to further develop an ML model, then tested it using gene expression (GE) data from C-07 and C-08. Methods: We carried out a prospectively designed and double-blind study to evaluate the clinical utility of the ML model in the adjuvant setting. Samples were classified as Sig+ or Sig-. Association of signatures with recurrence free interval were tested using log-rank test, and significance was set at P<0.05. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios in univariate and multivariate models and for significance testing in multivariate models. Clinical variables included in multivariate models were nodal status, age, sex, and T stage. Results: We tested the ML model for its ability to predict oxaliplatin benefit in all C-07 pts with available GE data (n=846). Sig+ pts received significant benefit from oxaliplatin (HR=0.68, 95% CI=0.48-0.95, p=0.025) but Sig- did not (Sig- HR=1.05, 95% CI=0.72-1.53, p=0.79), however, the int p value showed only a trend for significance (int p=0.091). Sig+ remained significant for oxaliplatin benefit in multivariate analysis (HR=0.67, 95% CI=0.48-0.95, p=0.024). When we combined all C-07 pts (C-07 FULV-trtd n=298, FLOX n=304) with C-08 FOLFOX-treated pts (n=226) the Sig+ was significantly associated with oxaliplatin benefit (HR=0.65, 95% CI=0.48-0.89, p=0.0065) with a significant int p=0.03. We also tested the signature for association with bev benefit in C-08 (n=438), using a different cut off. Sig+ showed only a trend for an association with bev benefit (HR=0.63, 95% CI=0.35-1.12, p=0.11). To increase the power to detect bev benefit, we also tested the signature for association with bev benefit in all C-08 patients and C-07 pts treated with FLOX. The Sig+ group received significant benefit from bev (HR=0.58, 95% CI=0.36-0.94, p=0.025) but the Sig- group did not (HR=1.02, 95% CI=0.64-1.63, p=0.94), however, the int p was not significant (p=0.101). The model also showed an association with prognosis within the FULV treatment arm in C-07 (HR=1.51, 95% CI=1.07-2.14, p=0.018) and the FOLFOX+bev arm in C-08 (HR=0.55, 95% CI=0.30-1.01, p=0.049). Conclusions: Although our study is not optimally powered, our analyses indicate that the ML model was predictive for oxaliplatin benefit in stage II and III CC and may be useful for detecting bev benefit. Importantly, the Sig- population is candidate for omitting oxaliplatin (de-escalation) in adjuvant setting but will require further validation. Support: PA DOH, U10CA-180868, -180822, -196067, Genentech, Sanofi; NSABP. Clinical trial information: 00096278, 00004931.

NSABP FC-12: A single-arm, phase II study to evaluate treatment with gevokizumab in patients with stage II/III colon cancer who remain ctDNA+ after curative surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy

TPS3642

Background: Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients (pts) following surgery is indicative of presence of minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) and confers a near-certain risk of disease recurrence. Therapeutic strategies to treat MRD following standard curative therapies are needed because the risk of recurrence is high and therapeutic intervention may provide clinical benefit to patients. Gevokizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-1β (IL-1β), which is involved in all phases of the malignant process (tumorigenesis, invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis, progression, and the modulation of anti-tumor immunity). Gevokizumab has been validated in pre-clinical colon cancer (CC) models and safety established in the advanced-stage clinical setting. In this trial in progress, we aim to test the efficacy of gevokizumab in pts with early-stage CC with MRD (ctDNA-positivity) following definitive treatment. Methods: NSABP FC-12 is a single-arm, multi-centered phase II study that will include pts with stage II/III CC who test MRD+ within 6 wks following completion of curative surgery and ≥3 mos of adjuvant chemotherapy. MRD will be assessed using a personalized and tumor-informed ctDNA assay (Signatera bespoke assay). Gevokizumab will be given at a flat dose of 120 mg IV every 28 days for 13 cycles. The primary endpoint is relapse-free survival (RFS) following initiation of study therapy through one year of follow-up. Secondary endpoints are rate of ctDNA clearance at 8 wks from start of study therapy, as well as safety, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of gevokizumab. Exploratory and correlative endpoints will include outcomes associated with ctDNA clearance kinetics, tumor mutations, tumor mutational burden, circulating methylated DNA, tumor immune microenvironment profile, peripheral blood immune profile, and stool microbiome analyses. The enrollment period will be ̃12 mos. Pts will be followed for 18 mos following enrollment with ctDNA analysis at prespecified timepoints until imaging is positive for recurrence of disease or death. CT scans will be at 6-mo intervals. RFS will be determined in pts who clear ctDNA at 8 wks compared to those who do not. A single-stage design to test the null hypothesis that the 12-mo RFS is P≥0.20 versus the alternative (HA) that P≥0.35 has a sample size of 31 (alpha=0.151; power 0.811). If ≥9 of 31 pts (29%) are alive and recurrence-free at 12 mos, then gevokizumab will be considered promising for further study. Enrollment continues towards the primary endpoint. Clinical trial information: 05178576.

Using T stage to predict outcomes of adjuvant oxaliplatin (OX)-based chemotherapy (CT) in stage III colon cancer (CC): An ACCENT pooled analysis

3606

Background: Standard adjuvant CT for stage III CC are FOLFOX and CAPOX. Recently, IDEA study separated stage III patients (pts) into low risk (T1 to 3, N1) and high risk (T4 or N2). We recently confirmed benefit of OX in both risk groups. However, we observed a difference in the two high-risk subgroups, with benefit in N2 but not in T4 (Margalit O et al; Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021). This prompted us to compare outcomes (OS/TTR) between treatment with OX vs. without OX within sub-stage III CC groups defined by T and N. Methods: We pooled 4941 stage III CC pts from the three studies evaluating 6 months of CT with fluoropyrimidine (FP) ± OX: MOSAIC, C-07 and XELOXA. Baseline characteristics were compared using χ2 and t-test. OS was compared between OX and no OX in T and N subgroups. Kaplan-Meier analyses, adjusted and unadjusted Cox models stratified by study were used. Sub-groups classification was done according to OX benefit and verified by interaction test (Int) considered as significant with a P<0.1. We considered for recommendation of using OX-based adjuvant CT, 1) significant benefit in OS, 2) significant Int between substage and adjuvant therapy, and 3) the three individual trials showing similar results (benefit or non-benefit of OX). Results: In stage III population, T3 pts were 74.9%, T1-2 12.4%, T4 13.1%, while N stage was N1 64.7% and N2 35.3%. Population was well balanced according to treatment allocation in most subgroups. A significant benefit of OX was only observed in T3N1 and T3N2 (OS HR 0.76). Whatever N stage, there was no significant benefit of OX in the T1-2 and T4 subgroups. The effect of OX+FP vs FP alone in OS of the three studies differed between T3 and T1-2 subgroups (P = 0.047). Interaction was borderline between T3 and T4 subgroups (P = 0.10) but there was no interaction between T1-2 and T4 subgroups (P = 0.429). A benefit of OX in TTR remained in the T4 population. Discrepancy between advantage in time to relapse (TTR) and no advantage in OS was not explained by survival post relapse. Conclusions: Our analysis suggested that pts with T1-2N1-2 and T4N1-2 disease had no OS benefit of addition of OX to FP. The good survival achieved with FP alone in T1-2N1-2 pts (5-yr OS 89%) question the addition of OX. In the T4 population our results suggested that benefit of OX was limited and that further studies should assess this issue or at least stratify pts on T stage in the future adjuvant trials in CC. [Table: see text]

Colorectal cancer metastatic dMMR immuno-therapy (COMMIT) study: A randomized phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy versus mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezo in the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)—NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610

TPS3647

Background: Despite the superiority in progression-free survival (PFS) of inhibition of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway in dMMR/MSI-H as compared to chemotherapy with either anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFr) or anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibodies in mCRC, more pts had progressive disease as the best response in the anti-PD1 monotherapy arm (29.4% v 12.3%) with mean PFS of 13.7 mos, with ̃45% of pts in the IO arm progressed at 12 mos ( N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2207). We hypothesize that the dMMR/MSI-H mCRC pts may be more effectively treated with the combination of PD-1 pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-1 therapy (atezo) alone. Preclinical work demonstrated synergistic effects between anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF and between oxaliplatin/anti-PD-1 in murine CRC models and phase II data, which showed activity of anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF in chemotherapy refractory colon cancer. A recent randomized trial subgroup analyses of 8 pts with dMMR metastatic colon cancer treated with FOLFOXIRI+bev+atezo, with the first patient having progression ̃16 mos ( ESMO 2021, Abstt LBA20). Additionally, in other solid tumor malignancies, anti-PD1 plus anti-VEGFr (i.e., HCC and RCC) as well as anti-PD1 plus chemotherapy (i.e., gastric and esophageal cancers) combinations are standard first-line treatments. Methods: The redesigned COMMIT study was reactivated on 1/29/2021 as a two-arm prospective phase III open-label trial randomizing (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H to atezo monotherapy v mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Assuming our control arm, atezo monotherapy (48% PFS at 24 mos as assessed by site investigator), we have 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.6 (equivalent to 64.4% PFS at 24 mos) with alpha 0.025 one-sided. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Secondary endpoints include OS, objective response rate, safety profile, disease control rate, and duration of response. Health-related quality of life is an exploratory objective. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Key inclusion criteria are: mCRC without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; and measurable disease per RECIST. Enrollment actively continues to the target accrual of 211 patients randomized between the two immunotherapy arms. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, -180888, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067. Clinical trial information: NCT02997228.

NSABP FC-10: A phase Ib study of pembrolizumab (pembro) in combination with pemetrexed (pem) and oxaliplatin (oxali) in patients with chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

3569

Background: Most pts with mCRC have microsatellite stable (MSS) disease (95%) which is unresponsive to checkpoint inhibition. Chemotherapy activity is mediated through both cytotoxicity as well as immunological effects including reduced T-regulatory cell activity, enhanced tumor antigen presentation, and induced PD-L1 tumor cell expression. Chemotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors can potentially activate T cells and alter the microenvironment to improve outcomes. Our purpose was to evaluate pembro plus pem in a safety run-in (cohort 1) and the same with dose-escalated oxali (cohort 2). Methods: Eligible pts with MSS mCRC had ECOG PS of 0-1, measurable metastatic disease, adequate organ function, and prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-, oxali-, and irinotecan-based therapies (plus an anti-EGFR agent, if apropos). Cohort 1 treatment was pem 500 mg/m2 IV plus pembro 200 mg IV every 3 wks. Cohort 2 treatment was the same, plus oxali at an escalating dose of 85-120 mg/m2 utilizing a 3+3 design with expansion of 6 additional pts at the RP2D. Imaging was performed every 3 cycles; response was determined by RECIST 1.1. Primary endpoint (EP) of each cohort: safety and best ORR with cohort 2 also to establish the RP2D. Secondary EPs: Clinical benefit rate (CBR), PFS, OS at 1 year, and exploratory assessments of circulating immunologic profiles and molecular predictors of response. Descriptive statistics were planned as a signal-seeking study. Results: From Jul 2019-Apr 2021, 34 pts enrolled from 4 different centers. In cohort 1 (n=15), one pt was taken off study due to LFT elevation and orchitis attributed to pembro with reduced lymphadenopathy upon withdrawal. There was 1 PR (duration 686 days) and 4 SDs (61, 66, 124, 128 days) among 11 evaluable for response. There were no unexpected nor grade 5 toxicities. In cohort 2 (n=19), 2 pts achieved a PR (127 and 185 days), with SDs in 5 (59, 63, 69, 115, 437), among 13 evaluable for response. At oxali dose of 85 mg/m2, 1/6 pts had DLT (grade 4 neutropenia ≥7 days); another 1/6 pts had DLT at 120 mg/m2 (grade 3 AST/ALT). The RP2D was 120 mg/m2. Common grade 3/4 AEs included: neutropenia (24%), anemia (9%), fatigue (9%), abdominal pain (6%), nausea (6%), and ALT/AST (6%). There was no febrile neutropenia nor any grade 5 events. Combined cohort rates of PR/CBR were 3/24 (12.5%) and 12/24 (50%), respectively. Conclusions: In this study of heavily pretreated pts with MSS mCRC, combining pembro plus pem or pem+oxali was well tolerated. Overall CBR was 50%, with objective responses (PRs) in 3/24 (12.5%) evaluable pts. This compares favorably with KEYNOTE 016, in which pembro in MSS mCRC pts had 0/18 objective responses and CBR=11% (2/18). Further studies testing these agents in earlier lines of treatment with robust correlative analyses is supported. Support: NSABP Foundation; Merck; Lilly. Clinical trial information: NCT03626922.

Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer treated with ovarian suppression: a patient-level meta-analysis of 7030 women from four randomised trials

BACKGROUND

For women with early-stage oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, adjuvant tamoxifen reduces 15-year breast cancer mortality by a third. Aromatase inhibitors are more effective than tamoxifen in postmenopausal women but are ineffective in premenopausal women when used without ovarian suppression. We aimed to investigate whether premenopausal women treated with ovarian suppression benefit from aromatase inhibitors.

METHODS

We did a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials comparing aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, exemestane, or letrozole) versus tamoxifen for 3 or 5 years in premenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer receiving ovarian suppression (goserelin or triptorelin) or ablation. We collected data on baseline characteristics, dates and sites of any breast cancer recurrence or second primary cancer, and dates and causes of death. Primary outcomes were breast cancer recurrence (distant, locoregional, or contralateral), breast cancer mortality, death without recurrence, and all-cause mortality. As distant recurrence invariably results in death from breast cancer several years after the occurrence, whereas locoregional recurrence and new contralateral breast cancer are not usually fatal, the distant recurrence analysis is shown separately. Standard intention-to-treat log-rank analyses estimated first-event rate ratios (RR) and their confidence intervals (CIs).

FINDINGS

We obtained data from all four identified trials (ABCSG XII, SOFT, TEXT, and HOBOE trials), which included 7030 women with ER-positive tumours enrolled between June 17, 1999, and Aug 4, 2015. Median follow-up was 8·0 years (IQR 6·1-9·3). The rate of breast cancer recurrence was lower for women allocated to an aromatase inhibitor than for women assigned to tamoxifen (RR 0·79, 95% CI 0·69-0·90, p=0·0005). The main benefit was seen in years 0-4 (RR 0·68, 99% CI 0·55-0·85; p<0·0001), the period when treatments differed, with a 3·2% (95% CI 1·8-4·5) absolute reduction in 5-year recurrence risk (6·9% vs 10·1%). There was no further benefit, or loss of benefit, in years 5-9 (RR 0·98, 99% CI 0·73-1·33, p=0·89) or beyond year 10. Distant recurrence was reduced with aromatase inhibitor (RR 0·83, 95% CI 0·71-0·97; p=0·018). No significant differences were observed between treatments for breast cancer mortality (RR 1·01, 95% CI 0·82-1·24; p=0·94), death without recurrence (1·30, 0·75-2·25; p=0·34), or all-cause mortality (1·04, 0·86-1·27; p=0·68). There were more bone fractures with aromatase inhibitor than with tamoxifen (227 [6·4%] of 3528 women allocated to an aromatase inhibitor vs 180 [5·1%] of 3502 women allocated to tamoxifen; RR 1·27 [95% CI 1·04-1·54]; p=0·017). Non-breast cancer deaths (30 [0·9%] vs 24 [0·7%]; 1·30 [0·75-2·25]; p=0·36) and endometrial cancer (seven [0·2%] vs 15 [0·3%]; 0·52 [0·22-1·23]; p=0·14) were rare.

INTERPRETATION

Using an aromatase inhibitor rather than tamoxifen in premenopausal women receiving ovarian suppression reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrence. Longer follow-up is needed to assess any impact on breast cancer mortality.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council.

Abstract P3-17-03: Raising the level of cancer care around the world: The feasibility and perceived benefit of a virtual breast tumor board

Introduction: It is well established that multidisciplinary tumor boards improve the decision-making process for cancer patients. Tumor boards have been shown to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and staging, optimize patient outcomes, increase adherence to guidelines, and educate our peers and trainees. However, over 80% of patients in the United States receive their cancer care in the community setting, where access to multi-disciplinary tumor boards may not be readily available. This may particularly impact underserved populations who often lack the resources to travel to an academic center for second opinions or treatment. The problem is worse in low-resource countries. Virtual expert tumor boards could provide an effective solution. Methods: Preeminent breast oncology faculty from around the Unites States were assembled into virtual tumor board panels via an online platform to discuss challenging cases submitted by community providers and trainees. These tumor boards consisted of a moderator, a breast radiologist, a breast medical oncologist, a breast surgeon, and a breast radiation oncologist. The purpose of this ongoing endeavor is to educate community oncologists on how to best manage challenging cases. Following tumor board discussions, written recommendations were shared with submitting providers within 48 hours and recordings of the discussions were also later provided. After submitting providers watched the recording of their case discussion, we conducted a survey to determine their perceived benefit of the expert panel discussion. Results: From Sept 2020 to June 2021, ten breast cancer panels were virtually convened with 17 expert faculty panelists. During that time, 21 providers submitted 94 cases from the U.S. and around the world to be discussed by the expert panel. Thirty-three percent of the providers who submitted a case to be discussed have subsequently submitted an additional case to a later panel. Surveys were sent to all submitting providers and responses were recorded from 16/21 submitters (76.2%).

Conclusion: With more than three out of four submitters responding, we learned that not only is it feasible to convene virtual expert breast tumor boards to discuss challenging cases, but the vast majority of respondents learned new information, changed management of their patients, and wanted to submit additional cases. This effort could raise the level of breast cancer care around the world. Ongoing assessment of educational and patient care impacts will be necessary.

QuestionNumber answered (n)Number who answered yes (%)Number who answered no (%)Did you learn something new from the PrecisCa discussion of your case scenario?1614 (87.5)2 (12.5)Will anything you learned from the PrecisCa discussion of your case scenario change the management of this or future patients?1615 (93.8)1 (6.2)Are you likely to submit a future challenging case scenario to PrecisCa?1616 (100)0 (0)

Citation Format: Naomi Dempsey, Lauren Chiec, Mikala Lodder, Erin Shonkwiler, Kayla Haines, Reshma Mahtani, William Gradishar, Thomas Buchholz, Anne O'Dea, Norman Wolmark, Sara Hurvitz, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Maxine Jochelson, Reni Butler, Eleftherios Mamounas, Frank Vicini, Mark Pegram, Chirag Shah, Tari King, Ruth O'Regan, Monica Morrow, Mohammad Jahanzeb. Raising the level of cancer care around the world: The feasibility and perceived benefit of a virtual breast tumor board [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-17-03.

Abstract P3-18-04: Evaluating -escalation of reast adiation () following lumpectomy for breast conservative treatment of stage 1, hr+, HER2-, RS ≤18 breast cancer: NRG-BR007 a phase III trial

Roughly 50% of newly diagnosed breast cancer is stage 1, the majority being ER/PR positive, HER2- negative. Genomic assays such as Oncotype DX® have identified patients with reduced distant metastasis and lack of chemotherapy benefit, allowing patients to avoid excess toxicity. These genomic assays have been shown to be prognostic for local-regional recurrence (LRR). The de-escalation of therapy is of interest to patients, providers, and payers. Low risk, as identified by both the use of Oncotype and Mammaprint® is associated with low LRR after lumpectomy and breast radiotherapy. TRIAL DESIGN: In the DEBRA trial, we hypothesized that breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone is non-inferior to BCS plus radiotherapy for in-breast cancer control and breast preservation in women intending appropriate endocrine therapy for stage 1 (ER and/or PR-positive, HER2-negative, and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score [RS] low) breast cancer. Stratification is by age (&lt;60; ≥60), tumor size (≤1 cm; &gt;1-2 cm), and RS &lt;11, RS 11-18. Patients are randomized to either breast radiotherapy (RT) plus endocrine therapy (arm 1) or to observation and endocrine therapy (arm 2). Arm 1 therapy is post-lumpectomy breast RT using standard methods (hypo- or conventional-fractionated whole breast irradiation with or without boost, accelerated partial breast irradiation) and at least 5 years of endocrine therapy (tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor). In arm 2, at least 5 years of endocrine therapy (tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor) will be given. The specific regimen of endocrine therapy in both arms is at the treating physician’s discretion. ELIGIBLITY: Patients who are stage 1: pT1 (2 cm), pN0, age ≥50 to &lt;70 years, status post (s/p) lumpectomy with negative margins (no ink on tumor ), s/p axillary nodal staging (SNB or AND), ER and/or PR positive by ASCO/CAP, HER2-negative by ASCO/CAP, and Oncotype DX RS of ≤18 on diagnostic core biopsy or resected specimen. ENDPOINTS: Primary: In-breast recurrence (IBR). Secondary: Breast conservation rate, invasive in-breast recurrence (IIBR), relapse free interval (RFI), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), patient-reported breast pain, patient-reported worry about recurrence, and adherence to endocrine therapy. STATISTICS: We assume a clinically acceptable difference in IBR of 4% at 10 years to judge omission of RT as non-inferior (10-year event-free survival for RT group is 95.6% versus 91.6% for the omission of RT group). To be able to detect non-inferiority with 80% power and a one sided α=0.025, and assuming that there would be a ramp-up in accrual in the first two years of the study (leveling off in Years 3-5), 1,670 (835 per arm) patients are required to be randomized. This conservatively assumes loss to follow-up will be 1% per year. Some of the T1a patients accrued to this study will have oncotype DX scores &gt;18, making them ineligible for the study. An extra step in the accrual process will require us to register 1,714 patients to ensure our final randomized cohort is 1,670 patients. Accrual: Screen 1,714 to randomize 1,670 into the study. Contact information: Protocol: CTSU member website: https://www.ctsu.org. NRG Oncology Pgh Clinical Coordinating Dpt: 1-800-477-7227 or ccd@nsabp.org. Support: U10CA180868, U10CA180822. NCT04852887.

Citation Format: Julia White, Stewart J Anderson, Eleanor ER Harris, Eleftherios P Mamounas, Daniel G Stover, Patricia A Ganz, Reshma Jagsi, Reena S Cecchini, Carmen Bergom, Valerie Theberge, Mahmoud El-Tamer, Rich C Zellars, Dean A Shumway, Guang-Pei Chen, Thomas B Julian, Norman Wolmark. Evaluating de-escalation of breast radiation (DEBRA) following lumpectomy for breast conservative treatment of stage 1, hr+, HER2-, RS ≤18 breast cancer: NRG-BR007 a phase III trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-18-04.

Abstract P1-07-04: Potential role of the antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) in tumors achieving pCR in NRG Oncology/NSABP B-52

Background: The NRG Oncology/NSABP B-52 neoadjuvant clinical trial was conducted to test if the addition of estrogen deprivation (ED) would improve the pCR rate in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer patients (pts) treated with docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (TCHP). A numerical increase in pCR rate was observed with ED (46.1% v 40.9%), but the difference was not statistically significant. We have previously quantitated T cells (CD8, FOXP3), macrophages (CD68), and immune checkpoint proteins (PD-1, PD-L1) with multiplex immunofluorescence in B-52 and shown that CD68 and FOXP3 cells were associated with pCR but not CD8 cells. Our purpose was to determine the associations of FCGR genotypes and immune cells with pCR. Methods: A single baseline, pre-treatment FFFPE tissue section per case (N=181) was used to perform a 7-plex multiplex immunofluorescence procedure using opal fluorophores for staining. The Vectra Pathology System and inForm analysis software (Akoya Biosciences) was used for imaging and quantitation of CD8, CD68, FOXP3, PD-1, and PD-L1 cells in both the tumoral and stromal regions. Stromal data is reported here. Favorable- and unfavorable- FcGγR genotypes for FCGR2A-131H/R and FCGR3A-158V/F alleles were determined via the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform. Rates of pCR with pts with 1 or 2 favorable alleles was compared to pts who were homozygous for the unfavorable allele. Within each genotype, Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to test the association of markers with pCR and within each treatment. Results: No significant association of FCGR2A and 3A alleles with pCR was detected in the entire B-52 cohort, however, among pts with favorable FCGR genotypes (FCGR2A-131-HH, or H/R, FCGR3A-158- VV, or VF HR) the median value of the % CD68 cells was significantly higher in tumors that achieved pCR v those that did not (p=0.0004, p=0.0006), respectively. In pts who were homozygous for the FCGR2A or FCGR3A unfavorable alleles, there was no significant difference in the median values of the % of CD68 cells between pCR and no-pCR tumors. Further stratification of tumors by treatment showed that pts with an FCGR2A or FCGR3A favorable genotype and whose tumors achieved pCR had a higher median value of CD68 only in the TCHP + ED arm (p=0.0007, p=0.0003), respectively and not in the TCHP arm (p=0.059; p=0.21). Higher levels of PD-L1 were associated with pCR in pts with FCGR3A- favorable genotypes, but higher levels of FOXP3 were associated with pCR regardless of genotype. In contrast to the other cell types, higher PD-1 or CD8 cells showed no association with genotypes. Conclusions: This is an exploratory study examining the potential role of ADCP in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer and supports the notion that ADCP may be one mechanism that promotes the elimination of tumor cells in a subset of pts in the neoadjuvant setting. Tumors that achieve pCR have higher % of CD68 cells, in pts with favorable FCGR2A and 3A genotypes than pts who do not. However, in pts with unfavorable FCGR3A or FCGR2A genotypes there was no difference in the median CD68 levels in pCR v no-pCR tumors. When tumors were further stratified by CD68 levels, FCGR3A genotypes, and treatment, the association of pCR in tumors with high CD68 and FCGR3A favorable genotypes was seen only in the TCHP+ED arm. This may indicate that ED may improve pCR rates in some tumors with more macrophages and favorable genotypes. Macrophages are known to have estrogen receptors, and estrogen has been shown to promote the alternative activation of macrophages, potentially dampening down the immune response. Thus, one could speculate that ED may block the estrogen-induced alternative activation of macrophages, allowing the classically activated macrophages to phagocytize tumor cells. Support: BCRF, U10CA180868 & Admin Sup, U24CA196067, Genentech, NSABP Foun.

Citation Format: Katherine L Pogue-Geile, Ying Wang, Huichen Feng, Corey Lipchick, Patrick Gavin, Rim S Kim, Reena S Cecchini, Samuel A Jacobs, Ashok Srinivasan, Sandra M Swain, Eleftherios Mamounas, Charles E Geyer, Jr, Priya Rastogi, Peter C Lucas, C. Kent Osborne, Soonmyung Paik, Norman Wolmark, Mothaffar F Rimawi. Potential role of the antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) in tumors achieving pCR in NRG Oncology/NSABP B-52 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-04.

Abstract PD15-05: Assessment of estrogen receptor (ESR1) mRNA expression for prediction of extended aromatase inhibitor benefit in HR-positive breast cancer using NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42

Background: In NSABP B-14, the quantitative levels of ESR1 mRNA, assessed using the standardized 21-gene assay and qRT-PCR platform predicted tamoxifen benefit (interaction p-value &lt;0.001). NSABP B-42 evaluated the effect of extended letrozole in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who have completed 5 years of hormonal therapy with either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor. We proposed to determine if ESR1 mRNA, reported as the quantitative ER single gene score, is predictive of the magnitude of benefit from extended adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole in patients enrolled in NSABP B-42. Methods: This prospectively planned retrospective study used a stratified cohort sample drawn from the 2,589 B-42 patients with available tumor tissue blocks and appropriate consent. All 133 patients who experienced distant recurrence and 48 patients who experienced local/regional but not distant recurrence were included along with a stratified random sample of 547/2,408 patients without recurrence. The primary endpoint was distant recurrence. The primary analysis tested for the interaction between the continuous ER single gene score and the effect of extended letrozole treatment using a weighted Cox proportional hazards regression model. A secondary analysis considered the ER single gene score categorized using the prespecified cutoff of ≤9.1 versus &gt;9.1. Recurrence-free interval was a secondary endpoint. Results: The results of the assay were available for 587 patients. The median ER score was 10.2 (IQR 9.3-11.0). There were 131 patients (23.2% weighted) with ER ≤9.1 and 456 (76.8% weighted) with ER &gt;9.1. No significant interaction of the effect of extended letrozole treatment was found for either the ER single gene score (interaction hazard ratio letrozole vs. placebo with an IQR change in ER score 1.10, 95% CI 0.66 - 1.82, p=.72) or the categories ER ≤9.1 (treatment HR=0.40, 95% CI 0.15-1.06) or ER &gt;9.1 (treatment HR=0.70, 95% CI 0.43-1.12) (interaction p=.32). There was also no apparent prognostic effect of the ER single gene score for distant recurrence with placebo treatment after 5 years of endocrine therapy (p=.12). Results were similar in analyses of any recurrence, analyses adjusting for the proliferation axis from the 21-gene assay, and subgroup analyses by nodal and HER2-status. Conclusions: The B-42 study provided no evidence that ESR1 mRNA as measured by the ER single gene score can inform decisions regarding extended letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Confidence intervals were relatively wide but rule out a strong predictive effect of the ER single gene score in the expected direction. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, U24CA196067; Novartis; Exact Sciences

Citation Format: Eleftherios Mamounas, Hanna Bandos, Priya Rastogi, Michael R Crager, Carolyn Mies, Peter C Lucas, Charles E Geyer, Jr, Louis Fehrenbacher, Mark L Graham, Stephen KL Chia, Adam M Brufsky, Janice M Walshe, Gamini S Soori, Shaker R Dakhil, Soonmyung Paik, Sandra M Swain, Frederick L Baehner, Steven Shak, Norman Wolmark. Assessment of estrogen receptor (ESR1) mRNA expression for prediction of extended aromatase inhibitor benefit in HR-positive breast cancer using NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD15-05.

Abstract GS1-07: Adjuvant palbociclib in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: Final results from 5,760 patients in the randomized phase III PALLAS trial

Background Advances in the multidisciplinary care of hormone-receptor positive (HR+) early breast cancer (eBC) have markedly improved clinical outcomes: however, disease recurrence may still occur, particularly in patients (pts) with moderate or high-risk cancers at the time of diagnosis. The use of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) is a standard of care for advanced breast cancer, supporting the rationale to study CDK4/6i in the eBC setting. Here we present the final protocol-planned analyses of the global phase III PALLAS trial investigating whether the addition of the CDK4/6i palbociclib (P) to adjuvant ET improves outcomes over ET alone for HR+/HER2- eBC. Methods PALLAS (PALbociclib CoLlaborative Adjuvant Study, NCT02513394) is a randomized phase III open-label trial in which pts with stage II-III HR+/HER2- eBC were randomized to receive either 2 years of P with adjuvant ET (P+ET) or ET alone. The primary endpoint is invasive disease-free survival (iDFS); secondary endpoints include distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Mandatory biospecimen collection has supported the creation of an expansive translational science program, and long-term follow-up is planned. Revised sample size calculations required recruitment of 5600 pts in order to detect a 25% iDFS improvement in patients receiving P+ET with 85% power; this final protocol-planned analysis was planned after 469 iDFS events. Results From September 1, 2015 to November 30, 2018, 5,761 pts (median age 52 years, range 22-90) were randomized in 406 centers in 21 countries worldwide. 1,014 (17.6%) had stage IIA disease (capped) and 4,728 (82.1%) stages IIB/III. 4,754 (82.5%) had received prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. After a protocol-planned 2nd interim analysis in May 2020 crossed the futility threshold, 349 P+ET pts still on active treatment stopped P and were transferred to follow-up. At the time of final analysis cutoff date (November 20, 2020), after a median follow-up of 31 months and 516 events recorded, iDFS was similar between the two arms, with 3-year iDFS of 89.3% (95% CI: 87.8-90.6%) for Palbo+ET, and 89.4% (88.0-90.7%) for ET alone (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI: 0.81-1.14). There was no statistically significant difference in secondary outcome endpoints. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant interactions between treatment effect and other factors (including risk category). The safety profile of P was as expected, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia the most common side effect (safety population: 1759/2841 [61.9%] vs 11/2902 [0.4%]). Overall 42% of pts. discontinued P prior to the planned 2-year duration, 28.2% of Palbo+ET pts discontinued therapy due to adverse events, without an observed impact on survival outcomes. Conclusions Now with the full number of events, this analysis of the PALLAS trial shows that the addition of 2 years of P to ongoing adjuvant ET did not improve survival endpoints for pts with stage II-III HR+/HER2- eBC. Whether P is beneficial in the adjuvant setting for certain sub-groups of pts will be further evaluated with longer-term follow-up and by the ongoing translational science program. Support: ABCSG; AFT; Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02513394; https://www.abcsg.org; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org

Citation Format: Michael Gnant, Amylou C Dueck, Sophie Frantal, Miguel Martin, Hal Burstein, Richard Greil, Peter Fox, Antonio C Wolff, Arlene Chan, Eric Winer, Christian Singer, Kathy Miller, Marco Colleoni, Michelle Naughton, Gabor Rubovszky, Judith Bliss, Ingrid A Mayer, Guenther G Steger, Zbigniew Nowecki, Olwen Hahn, Norman Wolmark, Hope Rugo, Georg Pfeiler, Hannes Fohler, Otto Metzger, Céline Schurmans, Kathy P Theall, Dongrui R Lu, Kathleen Tenner, Christian Fesl, Angela DeMichele*, Erica L Mayer, *shared last authorship. Adjuvant palbociclib in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: Final results from 5,760 patients in the randomized phase III PALLAS trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-07.

Association of multiplex-immunofluorescence (m-IF) and gene expression signature with prognosis and bevacizumab (bev) treatment outcomes in NRG oncology/NSABP C-08: Implications for combining immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and bev

140

Background: NRG Oncology/NSABP C-08 tested the efficacy of adding bev to mFOLFOX in patients (pts) with stage II or III colon cancer. In an unplanned analysis we showed that MMR status was predictive of bev benefit with dMMR pts receiving statistically significant bev benefit. More recently, we showed that immune cells and immune checkpoint proteins have differential effects on prognosis and bev benefit in C-08 (ASC0 2021). As part of a preplanned secondary objective of an NCTN-CCSC approved protocol, we tested the association of VEGFR, VEGFA, and CD31, with clinical outcomes and treatment benefit in dMMR and pMMR pts enrolled in C-08. To determine what subset of pts within C-08 received bev benefit, we tested the 10-gene IFNɣ signature (Ayers et al 2017), which has been shown to associate with response to ICB in other studies. Methods: VEGFR, VEGFA, and CD31 were quantitated in tumors from C-08 pts (N=1,485) using m-IF and the Vectra Pathology System and inForm software. Gene expression data of C-08 (n=387) via DASLR microarrays was used to test the IFNɣ signature for association with bev benefit in dMMR and pMMR pts. All markers were tested for associations with prognosis and bev benefit in dMMR and pMMR pts using recurrence-free interval, median cut points, and Cox models. Results: VEGFR, VEGFA, and CD31 were not prognostic in the total C-08 cohort nor in dMMR or pMMR subsets. However, high VEGFR was associated with bev benefit in dMMR pts p=0.0012, HR=0.08 [95% CI; 0.025-0.224], n=117) but not in pts with pMMR (n=555) (int p=0.03). Pts whose tumors showed higher expression of the IFNɣ signature had a better prognosis than did pts with a low signature. Importantly, in the entire C-08 cohort with available DASL data, pts with low IFNɣ signatures received bev benefit (p=0.034, HR=0.59 [95% CI: 0.36-0.97], n=211). When low IFNɣ tumors were further split by MMR status both dMMR and pMMR pts showed a trend to receive bev benefit, however, numbers of pts were too small to make firm conclusions (dMMR no bev vs. bev p=0.02, n=11; pMMR no bev vs. bev, p=0.051, n=167). Conclusions: High VEGFR is associated with bev benefit in dMMR pts. In agreement with other studies, we observe that the IFNɣ signature is associated with a good prognosis in C-08, however, unique to this study is the observation that IFNɣ low is associated with bev benefit in the entire C-08 cohort. The association of high IFNɣ signature with ICB response seen in several other studies, plus our observation that low IFNɣ is associated with bev benefit in C-08, suggests that bev and ICB are most efficacious on different subsets of pts. Current clinical trial, GI-004, is testing the efficacy of the bev + atezolizumab combination. Examination of these markers may be informative. Support: PA DOH, U10CA-180868, -180822, -196067, Genentech, Sanofi; NSABP Clinical trial information: 00096278.

Behavioral and health outcomes from the NRG Oncology/NSABP B-36 trial comparing two different adjuvant therapy regimens for early-stage node-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The NSABP B-36 compared four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) with six cycles of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-100) in node-negative early-stage breast cancer. A sub-study within B-36, focusing on symptoms, quality of life (QOL), menstrual history (MH), and cardiac function (CF) was conducted.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients completed the QOL questionnaire at baseline, during treatment, and every 6 months through 36 months. FACT-B Trial Outcome Index (TOI), symptom severity, and SF-36 Vitality and Physical Functioning (PF) scales scores were compared between the two groups using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis. MH was collected at baseline and subsequently assessed if menstrual bleeding occurred within 12 months prior to randomization. Post-chemotherapy amenorrhea outcome was examined at 18 months and was defined as lack of menses in the preceding year. Logistic regression was used to test for association of amenorrhea and treatment. CF assessment was done at baseline and 12 months. Correlation analysis was used to address associations between changes in baseline and 12-month PF and concurrent CF changes measured by LVEF.

RESULTS

FEC-100 patients had statistically significantly lower TOI scores during chemotherapy (P = 0.02) and at 6 months (P < 0.001); lower Vitality score at 6 months (P < 0.01), and lower PF score during the first year than AC patients. There were no statistically significant QOL score differences between the two groups beyond 12 months. No significant differences in symptom severity between the two groups were observed. Rates of amenorrhea were significantly different between FEC-100 and AC (67.4% vs. 59.1%, P < 0.001). There was no association between changes in LVEF and PF (P = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically significant QOL differences between the two groups favored AC; however, the magnitude was small and unlikely to be clinically meaningful. There was a clinical and statistically significant difference in risk for amenorrhea, favoring AC.

TRIAL REGISTRY

NCT00087178; Date of registration: 07/08/2004.