Assessment of the Concerns of Caregivers of Children with Repaired Esophageal Atresia-Tracheoesophageal Fistula Related to Feeding-Swallowing Difficulties

The study aimed to assess concerns of caregivers of children with EA-TEF related to feeding-swallowing difficulties, compare the concerns according to type of atresia and repair time, and investigate its relationship with time to start oral feeding. Caregivers accompanying 64 children with EA-TEF were included. Age, sex, type of atresia, repair time, and time to start oral feeding were noted. Parents completed the Turkish version of the Feeding/Swallowing Impact Survey (T-FS-IS) to assess the concerns of caregivers related to feeding-swallowing difficulties. The T-FS-IS has three subscales including daily activities, worry, and feeding difficulties. The median age of patients was 3 (min = 1, max = 12) years, of which 57.8% were male. 43.8% of cases were isolated-EA, and 56.3% were EA-distal TEF. 57.8% of cases received early repair, and 42.2% had delayed repair. The median time to start oral feeding was 4 weeks (min = 1, max = 128). The mean scores of daily activities, worry, feeding difficulties, and total score from the T-FS-IS were 2.43 ± 1.18, 2.73 ± 1.28, 2.10 ± 0.97, and 2.44 ± 1.09, respectively. Caregivers of children with isolated-EA reported more problems in total score and all subscales of the T-FS-IS than EA-distal TEF (p < 0.01). Caregivers of children who received delayed repair reported more problems in total score and all subscales of the T-FS-IS than children with early repair (p < 0.05). Moderate to strong correlations were found between the T-FS-IS and time to start oral feeding (p < 0.01, r = 0.55-0.65). This study suggests that caregivers of children with isolated-EA and/or delayed repair and/or delay in oral intake may have higher concerns related to feeding-swallowing difficulties.

Turkish Version of the Mastication Observation and Evaluation (MOE) Instrument: A Reliability and Validity Study in Children

The Mastication Observation and Evaluation (MOE) instrument is an objective assessment of the chewing process in children. This study aimed to translate the MOE into Turkish and to test its reliability and validity in children with cerebral palsy (CP). A total of 53 children with CP and 27 typical children were included in the study. The MOE was translated from Dutch into Turkish by using the forward, backward, forward translation method. The internal consistency, intra- and inter-observer reliability, criterion, and discriminant validity of the Turkish version of the MOE (T-MOE) were investigated. Internal consistency was excellent with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.98. The Intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.89 to 0.97 for intra-rater reliability and from 0.86 to 0.94 for inter-rater reliability. The median score from Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale (KCPS) was 7 (min = 1, max = 8). All of the items in the T-MOE and the total T-MOE score had a negative and strong correlation with the KCPS score. Typical children without chewing disorders had greater T-MOE scores than the children with CP suffering from chewing disorders (p < 0.01). The T-MOE is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating the observed oral motor behaviors of chewing function in children. It can be used in clinical practice and research.Clinical trial number: NCT03811353.

Timing of Dysphagia Screening in Alzheimer's Dementia

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia is an important and frequent symptom in Alzheimer's dementia (AD). We hypothesized that dysphagia could be seen in the early stages of AD and sarcopenia presence rather than the severity of the AD affecting dysphagia. The main aim of this study was to investigate swallowing functions in AD patients according to stages. The second aim was to investigate the correlation between sarcopenia and dysphagia in AD.

METHODS

This study involved 76 probable AD patients. For all participants, diagnosis of sarcopenia was based on definitions from the revised version of European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People at 2018. Dysphagia symptom severity was evaluated by the Turkish version of the Eating Assessment Tool, a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) was performed for instrumental evaluation of swallowing. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the clinical dementia rating (CDR) scale as CDR 1 (mild dementia), CDR 2 (moderate dementia), and CDR 3 (severe dementia). Swallowing evaluation parameters were analyzed between these groups.

RESULTS

Mean age was 78.9 ± 6.4 years, and 56.4% were female. Twenty-six patients had mild dementia, 31 patients had moderate dementia, 19 patients had severe dementia (CDR 3). We found that sarcopenia rates were similar between AD stages according to CDR in our study population and dysphagia could be seen in every stage of AD. In a multivariate analysis, polypharmacy and sarcopenia were found to be independently associated factors for dysphagia, irrespective of stage of AD (OR: 6.1, CI: 1.57-23.9, P = 0.009; OR: 4.9, CI: 1.24-19.6, P = 0.023, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Aspirations may be subtle so that AD patients and caregivers may not be aware of swallowing difficulties. Therefore, all AD patients, especially those who have polypharmacy and/or sarcopenia (probable-sarcopenia-severe sarcopenia), should be screened for dysphagia in every stage.

Effects of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Swallowing Function and Quality of Life of Post-stroke Patients

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is one of the non-invasive techniques, which is used to modulate cortical regions in patients with stroke. The aim of this single blind, controlled study was to investigate the effect of rTMS on swallowing function and quality of life of mono-hemispheric post-stroke patients with dysphagia. Twenty-eight patients were randomized and split between study and control group. Each group received conventional dysphagia rehabilitation 3 days a week for 4 weeks, and study group also received 1 Hz rTMS to unaffected hemisphere in the final week. The descriptive information was noted. The clinical and radiological swallowing evaluation and quality of life assessment have been performed at four different times including before and after the treatment, 1 month and 3 months after the treatment. At baseline, no significant differences were observed between groups in terms of demographic and clinical features (p > 0.05). Swallowing function and quality of life of the patients were statistically improved in both groups towards the third month (p < 0.05). Swallowing function was comparable between two groups. However, a significant improvement was observed on appetite, fear of eating, and mental health parameters of quality of life assessment in the study group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, despite positive changes in some aspects of quality of life, rTMS did not enhance the swallowing function when compared conventional dysphagia rehabilitation. Therefore, the application of 1 Hz rTMS should be reconsidered to improve swallowing function in the chronic period.

Chewing Function in Children with Repaired Esophageal Atresia-Tracheoesophageal Fistula

INTRODUCTION

 Feeding problems are common in children with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF); however, chewing disorders, which may cause inability to intake solid food, have not been evaluated. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the chewing function in children with repaired EA-TEF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Age, sex, the type of atresia, the type of repair, and the time to start oral feeding were recorded. The level of the chewing performance was scored according to the Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale (KCPS). The International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) was used to determine the tolerated food texture in children.

RESULTS

 A group of 30 patients were included, of which 53.3% was male. The percentages of the isolated-EA and that of the EA-distal TEF were 40% and 60%, respectively. The median value for the time to start oral feeding was 4.5 weeks (min = 1, max = 72). Eleven (36.7%) children had chewing disorder. The KCPS scores showed level I in six cases, level III in four cases, and level IV in one case. Five children with chewing disorder had IDDSI level 3 and six had level 7, along with the sensation of stuck food. We found no significant difference between the KCPS scores according to the repair type (p = 0.07). The median values of the KCPS scores of children with primary repair, delayed repair, and colon interposition were 0 (min = 0, max = 4), 0.5 (min = 0, max = 3), 2 (min = 0, max = 3), respectively. A significant positive correlation was found between the time to start oral feeding and the KCPS scores (r = 0.63, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

 Chewing disorders can be observed in children with EA-TEF, and the type of repair and the delay in oral feeding may be related to chewing disorder. Therapeutic maneuvers are needed to improve the chewing function in children with EA-TEF.

The pediatric version of the eating assessment tool-10 has discriminant ability to detect aspiration in children with neurological impairments

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the ability of the Pediatric version of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (PEDI-EAT-10) to detect aspiration in children with neurological impairments.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-four children were included. Swallowing function was imaged with videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). The penetration and aspiration scale (PAS) was used to determine the penetration and aspiration severity. Parents completed the PEDI-EAT-10, which is a 10 item, reliable, and valid dysphagia symptom specific outcome instrument.

KEY RESULTS

The mean age of children was 59.91 ± 55.33 months (min = 18, max = 315), of which 52.8% were male. The mean PEDI-EAT-10 of children with airway aspiration (PAS > 5) was 22.32 ± 10.73 (min = 0, max = 40) and the mean PEDI-EAT-10 of children who did not have aspiration (PAS < 6) was 12.35 ± 8.64 (min = 0, max = 40). A linear correlation was found between PEDI-EAT-10 and PAS scores of children (r = 0.41, P < 0.001). The sensitivity of a PEDI-EAT-10 score greater than 12 in predicting aspiration was 77% and the specificity was 54%. A PEDI-EAT-10 score greater than 12 has a positive predictive value of 69% and a negative predictive value of 64%.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

The PEDI-EAT-10 could be used to detect unsafe airway issues to identify and refer children for further instrumental swallowing evaluation.

Shear bond strength of a novel porcelain repair system for different computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing ceramic materials

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of a novel repair system, Nova Compo SF with Ceramic Repair, Ivoclar, to computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) restorative materials (IPS e.max CAD and Empress CAD).

Materials and Methods

The specimens of each CAD/CAM restorative material were randomly divided into two subgroups of nine specimens, using one of two repair systems. All specimens were etched with hydrofluoric acid and rinsed under a water spray for 10 s, then air-dried for 10 s. Next, repair systems were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h and then additionally aged for 5000 thermal cycles. A shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine. Each fracture type was examined under a stereomicroscope at ×12.5 magnification. A two-way ANOVA test was used to detect significant differences between the CAD/CAM restorative materials and the composite repair systems. Subgroup analyses were performed using Tukey's honest significant difference.

Results

No statistically significant differences were observed between the repair systems (P = 0.9). The bond strength values from Empress CAD were statistically higher than those from e.max CAD (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Within limitations, SuperFlow may be an alternative to the ceramic repair materials we routinely used in the clinic. Empress CAD can be preferable to e.max CAD in terms of esthetically suitable clinical indications.

Effect of Swallowing Rehabilitation Protocol on Swallowing Function in Patients with Esophageal Atresia and/or Tracheoesophageal Fistula

Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of Swallowing Rehabilitation Protocol (SRP) on swallowing function (SF) of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF) patients with pharyngeal swallowing disorder. Materials and Methods In this study, 24 children with EA-TEF who had deglutitive and respiratory problems were grouped into either study (n = 12) or control group (n = 12) by basic randomization. Study group received the SRP including neuromuscular electrical stimulation, thermal tactile stimulation, and hyolaryngeal mobilization. The control group received nonnutritive stimulations. SF was evaluated with 3 mL liquid and pudding barium by videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) before and after 20 sessions of interventions. Results No statistical differences were found between groups in terms of descriptive characteristics including age, sex, weight, height, type of atresia, repair type, repair time, and start time of oral intake (p > 0.05). There were no statistical differences between groups in term of swallowing parameters (p > 0.05), except reflux (p = 0.004) according to VFSS findings. After 20 sessions of interventions, the study group showed improvement in penetration-aspiration scale scores, oral phase dysfunction, delay in swallowing reflex, and residue in valleculae and pyriform sinuses after pudding swallow. The control group showed improvement only in oral phase dysfunction. Conclusion SRP can be recommended to improve SF in patients with EA/TEF who have pharyngeal swallowing disorders.

Does Nissen fundoplication improve deglutition in children?

Soyer T, Yalçın Ş, Demir N, Karhan AN, Saltık-Temizel İN, Demir H, Tanyel FC. Does Nissen fundoplication improve deglutition in children? Turk J Pediatr 2017; 59: 28-34. A prospective study was performed to evaluate the effect of Nissen fundoplication (NF) on deglutition in children. Children who underwent NF between 2011-2015 were evaluated for demographic features, clinical findings, diagnostic methods for gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and indications for NF. Penetration aspiration scale (PAS), functional oral intake scale (FOIS) and esophageal functions were evaluated by videoflouroscopy (VFS). Preoperative and postoperative VFS findings were compared to evaluate the effect of NF on clinical findings and deglutition. Twenty-three children with a mean age of 5.08 ± 3.7 years were included. Female to male ratio was 15:8. Recurrent respiratory infections (RTI) (n: 14, 60.8%), swallowing dysfunction (n:13, 56.5%) and vomiting (n:10, 43.4%) were the most common symptoms. Preoperatively GER was diagnosed with barium swallowing study (BSS) contrast graphs (n:20, 87%) and with 24-hour esophageal pH monitorization (n:8, 34.8%). In 39.1% of patients, medical treatment for GER was used with a mean duration of 8 ± 5.8 months. Indications for NF were swallowing dysfunction (n: 18, 78%), GER complications (n:6, 26%), associated anatomical problems (n:4, 17.3%) and unresponsiveness to medical treatment (n: 3, 13%). Postoperative barium swallowing study and 24-hour esophageal pH monitorization showed no GER after NF in 95% of patients. Number of RTI were significantly decreased after NF (preoperative vs postoperative infection rate 4.21 vs 1.6 respectively, p < 0.05). VFS findings showed that PAS was significantly decreased after NF during both liquid and semi-liquid swallowing (p < 0.05). After NF, upper esophageal opening (UEO) was decreased when compared to preoperative VFS findings (p < 0.05 Esophageal cleaning, esophageal motility, esophageal backflow and lower esophageal sphincter narrowing did not alter after NF (p > 0.05). FOIS were significantly improved after NF (p < 0.05). VFS findings showed that penetration and aspiration were significantly decreased after NF and children had less RTI. Although, esophageal motility evaluated by VFS did not changed after NF, functional oral intake significantly improved in children.

Reliability and validity of a tool to measure the severity of tongue thrust in children: the Tongue Thrust Rating Scale

This study aimed to develop a scale called Tongue Thrust Rating Scale (TTRS), which categorised tongue thrust in children in terms of its severity during swallowing, and to investigate its validity and reliability. The study describes the developmental phase of the TTRS and presented its content and criterion-based validity and interobserver and intra-observer reliability. For content validation, seven experts assessed the steps in the scale over two Delphi rounds. Two physical therapists evaluated videos of 50 children with cerebral palsy (mean age, 57·9 ± 16·8 months), using the TTRS to test criterion-based validity, interobserver and intra-observer reliability. The Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale (KCPS) and Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS) were used for criterion-based validity. All the TTRS steps were deemed necessary. The content validity index was 0·857. A very strong positive correlation was found between two examinations by one physical therapist, which indicated intra-observer reliability (r = 0·938, P < 0·001). A very strong positive correlation was also found between the TTRS scores of two physical therapists, indicating interobserver reliability (r = 0·892, P < 0·001). There was also a strong positive correlation between the TTRS and KCPS (r = 0·724, P < 0·001) and a very strong positive correlation between the TTRS scores and DSFS (r = 0·822 and r = 0·755; P < 0·001). These results demonstrated the criterion-based validity of the TTRS. The TTRS is a valid, reliable and clinically easy-to-use functional instrument to document the severity of tongue thrust in children.

The Ability of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 to Detect Aspiration in Patients With Neurological Disorders

Background/Aims

Dysphagia is common in patients with neurological disorders. There is a need to identify patients at risk early by a useful clinical tool to prevent its serious complications. The study aims to determine the ability of the Turkish version of Eating Assessment Tool-10 (T-EAT-10) to detect aspiration in patients with neurological disorders.

Methods

Two hundred fifty-nine patients with neurological disorders who had complaints about swallowing difficulty and referred for a swallowing evaluation were included. Oropharyngeal dysphagia was evaluated with the T-EAT-10 and videofluoroscopic swallowing study in the same day. The penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) was used to document the penetration and aspiration severity.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 59.72 ± 17.24 years (minimum [min] = 18, maximum [max] = 96), of which 57.1% were male. The mean T-EAT-10 of patients who had aspiration (PAS > 5) was 25.91 ± 10.31 (min = 1, max = 40) and the mean T-EAT-10 of patients who did not have aspiration (PAS < 6) was 15.70 ± 10.54 (min = 0, max = 40) (P < 0.001). Patients with a T-EAT-10 score higher than 15 were 2.4 times more likely to aspirate. A linear correlation was found between T-EAT-10 and PAS scores of the patients (r = 0.416, P < 0.001). The sensitivity of a T-EAT-10 higher than 15 in detecting aspiration was 81.0% and the specificity was 58.0%. A T-EAT-10 score of higher than 15 has a positive predictive value of 72.0% and a negative predictive value of 69.0%.

Conclusion

The T-EAT-10 can be used to detect unsafe airway protection in neurology clinics to identify and refer dysphagic patients for further evaluation.

Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool-10 as an indicator to predict aspiration in children with esophageal atresia

AIM

Airway aspiration is a common problem in children with esophageal atresia (EA). Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool-10 (pEAT-10) is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate dysphagia symptoms in children. A prospective study was performed to evaluate the validity of pEAT-10 to predict aspiration in children with EA.

METHODS

Patients with EA were evaluated for age, sex, type of atresia, presence of associated anomalies, type of esophageal repair, time of definitive treatment, and the beginning of oral feeding. Penetration-aspiration score (PAS) was evaluated with videofluoroscopy (VFS) and parents were surveyed for pEAT-10, dysphagia score (DS) and functional oral intake scale (FOIS). PAS scores greater than 7 were considered as risk of aspiration. EAT-10 values greater than 3 were assessed as abnormal. Higher DS scores shows dysphagia whereas higher FOIS shows better feeding abilities.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included. Children with PAS greater than 7 were assessed as PAS+ group, and scores less than 7 were constituted as PAS- group. Demographic features and results of surgical treatments showed no difference between groups (p>0.05). The median values of PAS, pEAT-10 and DS scores were significantly higher in PAS+ group when compared to PAS- group (p<0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of pEAT-10 to predict aspiration were 88% and 77%, and the positive and negative predictive values were 22% and 11%, respectively. Type-C cases had better pEAT-10 and FOIS scores with respect to type-A cases, and both scores were statistically more reliable in primary repair than delayed repair (p<0.05). Among the postoperative complications, only leakage had impact on DS, pEAT-10, PAS and FOIS scores (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The pEAT-10 is a valid, simple and reliable tool to predict aspiration in children. Patients with higher pEAT-10 scores should undergo detailed evaluation of deglutitive functions and assessment of risks of aspiration to improve safer feeding strategies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II (Development of diagnostic criteria in a consecutive series of patients and a universally applied "gold standard").