Late gadolinium enhancement is a strong predictor of life threatening arrhythmias in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy undergoing ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden card

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

The usefulness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) for primary prevention of arrhythmic sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) has been questioned. Efforts to improve risk stratification have included scores such as the ‘MADIT-ICD benefit score’, and the use of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential usefulness of these two tools to assess the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias in patients with non-ischemic DCM undergoing ICD implantation for primary prevention of SCD.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CMR before ICD implantation for primary prevention of SCD. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy were used as reference. Patients with non-dilated cardiomyopathies were excluded.

The arrhythmic component of the MADIT-ICD benefit score (VT/VF score) was calculated for each patient, and considered high if ≥ 7, as recommended.

The primary endpoint was the occurrence of SCD or life-threatening arrhythmias (VF or VT >200 bpm). Follow-up was performed by device interrogation in all patients except those who suffered SCD.

Results

A total of 151 patients (93 ischemic, mean age 62±13 years, 75% male) with mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 27±8% were included. Overall, 72% (n=67) ischemic and 45% (n=26) non-ischemic patients had scores ≥ 7 and were considered high-risk. LGE was present in all patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, and in 76% (n=44) of patients with non-ischemic DCM.

During a median follow-up of 21 (8-38) months, 21 patients (13.9%, 11 ischemic and 10 non-ischemic) met the primary endpoint.

Overall, the event-free survival of non-ischemic patients was similar to that of ischemic patients (log rank p=0.269) – Fig 1A. In patients with non-ischemic DCM, there were 7 arrhythmic events (26.9%) in those with MADIT-ICD VT/VF scores ≥7, and 3 events (9.4%) in those with scores <7 (log rank p= 0.104) – Fig 1B.

In the same population, there were 10 arrhythmic events (23%) in patients with LGE, but no events in patients without LGE (log rank p=0.036) – Fig 1C.

LVEF was similar in patients with and without arrhythmic events (26±8% vs. 27±7%, p=0.717), and in those with and without LGE (26±7% vs. 28±9%, p=0.342).

Conclusion

The presence of LGE is a strong predictor of life threatening arrhythmias in patients in non-ischemic DCM undergoing ICD implantation for primary prevention, seemingly outperforming the clinical MADIT-ICD benefit score.

The peri-infarct gray zone of myocardial fibrosis is a better predictor of ventricular arrhythmias than dense core fibrosis in patients with previous myocardial infarction

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Current sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification relies heavily on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but markers to refine risk assessment are needed. Dense core fibrosis (DCF) and peri-infarct "gray zone" of myocardial fibrosis (GZF) on late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) have been proposed as potential arrhythmogenic substrates. The aim of our study was to determine whether DCF and GZF could predict the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with previous myocardial infarction.

Methods

We performed a single centre retrospective study enrolling consecutive patients with previous myocardial infarction undergoing CMR before implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Areas of LGE were subdivided into "core" DCF and "peri-infarct" GZF zones based on signal intensity (>5 SD, and 2-5 SD above the mean of reference myocardium, respectively).

The primary endpoint was a composite of sudden arrhythmic death, appropriate ICD shock, ventricular fibrillation (VF), or sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) as detected by the device.

Results

A total of 88 patients (median age 61 years [IQR 54-73], 84% male, median LVEF 30% [IQR 23-36%], 14% secondary prevention) were included. During a median follow-up of 23 months [IQR 9-38], 13 patients reached the primary endpoint (10 appropriate ICD shock, 2 sustained VT or VF, and 1 sudden arrhythmic death). Patients who attained the primary endpoint had similar DCF (30.4g ± 14.7 vs. 28.0g ± 15.3; P = 0.601) but a greater amount of GZF (18.1g ± 9.6 vs. 11.9g ± 6.7; P = 0.005). On univariate analysis, GZF was associated with the composite endpoint (HR: 1.09 per gram; 95%CI: 1.02-1.15; P = 0.006), whereas DCF was not (HR: 1.01 per gram; 95%CI: 0.98-1.05; P = 0.571). After adjustment for LVEF, GZF remained independently associated with the primary endpoint (adjusted HR: 1.06 per gram; 95% CI: 1.01-1.12; P = 0.035). Decision tree analysis identified 11.9g of GZF as the best cut-off to predict life-threatening arrhythmic events. The primary endpoint occurred in 11 out of the 35 patients (31.4%) with GZF ≥11.9g, but in only 2 of the 53 patients (3.8%) with GZF <11.9g – Figure.

Conclusions

The extent of peri-infarct GZF seems to be a better predictor of ventricular arrhythmias than DCF. This parameter may be useful to identify a subgroup of patients with previous myocardial infarction at increased risk of life-threatening arrhythmic events.

Prognostic significance of peak atrial longitudinal strain in patients with functional mitral regurgitation

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Chronic mitral regurgitation has been shown to promote left atrial (LA) dysfunction and remodeling. However, the significance of LA dysfunction in this setting has not been fully investigated. The aim of our study was to assess the prognostic impact of peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS), a surrogate of LA function, in a cohort of patients with LV systolic dysfunction and functional mitral regurgitation (FMR).

Methods

Patients with at least mild FMR and reduced LVEF (< 50%) under optimized medical therapy who underwent transthoracic echocardiography between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively identified at a single-centre. FMR grading was undertaken according to the new 2021 valvular guidelines. PALS was assessed by 2D speckle tracking in apical 4-chamber view (as per EACVI current recommendations). Cox proportional hazards regression was applied for univariable and multivariable analysis to investigate the association between clinical and echocardiographic parameters, namely PALS, and all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 307 patients (median age 70 years, 77% male) were included. Median LVEF was 35% (IQR: 27 – 40%) and median mitral regurgitant volume was 25mL (IQR: 14 – 34mL). According to the new ESC 2021 valvular guidelines, 32 patients had severe FMR (10%). During a median follow-up of 3.5 years (IQR 1.4 – 6.6), 148 patients died. Median PALS was 14% (IQR 8 – 20%). The unadjusted mortality incidence per 100 persons-years increased with progressively lower values of PALS (figure 1). On ROC curve analysis, the best PALS cut-off value associated with mortality was < 15%. Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to FMR severity and PALS > or < 15% are depicted in figure 2. PALS remained independently associated with all-cause mortality on multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.90 – 0.98; p = 0.004) even after adjustment for several (n = 14) clinical and echocardiographic confounders.

Conclusion

In a cohort of patients with reduced LVEF and functional mitral regurgitation, peak atrial longitudinal strain was associated with all-cause mortality. Abstract Figure 1  Abstract Figure 2

Left ventricular myocardial work in patients with high gradient severe symptomatic aortic stenosis

Background

Left ventricular myocardial work (LVMW) is a novel method to evaluated left ventricular (LV) function using pressure-strain loops. It might correct global longitudinal strain (GLS) for afterload, being eventually useful to assess whether GLS reduction is due to reduced contractility (reflected as reduced myocardial work) or increased afterload (reflected as increased myocardial work).

Aim

To describe indices of LVMW in a group of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods

We prospectively studied 104 consecutive patients (age: 71 years [IQR 66.5–75.5] years, 51% men) with severe symptomatic high gradient AS: mean transaortic pressure gradient: 56.5mmHg [IQR 46.8–67.8]; aortic valve area: 0.73cm2 [IQR 0.61–0.88]; indexed stroke volume: 47.7±1.3 mL/m2 (11 patients with low-flow AS), preserved LV ejection fraction (EV) (LVEF: 56.0% [51.0–61.3]; GLS: −14.5% [IQR −16.1 to −10.6]), with no previous coronary artery disease and no history of cardiomyopathy. Beyond complete transthoracic echocardiography, all patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance for LV myocardium tissue characterization. As proposed for AS, LV systolic pressure was corrected adding the mean transaortic pressure gradient to non-invasive systolic blood pressure cuff measurement in the echocardiographic algorithm. Four LVMW indices were collected in 83 patients (patients excluded for atrial fibrillation, left bundle branch block or absence of non-invasive blood pressure registration) and correlated to LV function indexes, LV hypertrophy and remodeling, myocardial tissue characterization, BNP and troponin levels (Pearson or Spearman correlation). These same indexes were compared in patients with LV ejection fraction (EF) below and above 50%, normal and reduced flow and presence of replacement fibrosis.

Results

Global constructive work (GCW) (2658.6±76.4mmHg%), global myocardial work (GMW) (2218.7±74.9mmHg%) and global wasted work (GWE) (262.0mmHg% [198.8–339.5]) were high above normal with concomitant lower work efficiency (WE) (88.0% [83.2–91.8]. Weak correlations were found between LVMW indexes and parameters describing aortic valve severity, flow and LV function (table). Except for significant differences of LVMI in patients with reduced LV ejection fraction (GCW 2770.3±687.4 vs 2056.0±380.7mmHg%, p=0,014 and GMW 2362.5±657.9 vs 1621.3±319.9, p=0,021 in patients with LV EF>50% vs. LV EF<50%, respectively) work indexes were neither significantly different in low-flow patients nor in those with myocardial late gadolinium enhancement.

Conclusions

Global constructive and myocardial work are increased in these patients with severe aortic stenosis. This might reflect an increased afterload predominance rather than a LV functional impairment, particularly relevant in this group of patients with exclusive high gradient disease and preserved LVEF.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Correlations between LVMI – LV function

Predicting pacemaker dependency after TAVI with pre-procedural MSCT

Background and aim

High degree conduction disturbances is a burdensome complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). There is limited data whether such disorders are permanent or reversible. Anatomic surrogates, such as membranous septum [MS, a distance marker from aortic annulus to His-bundle surge] and calcium distribution within aortic valve have been associated with pacemaker (PM) implantation. The aim of our study was to assess predictors of long-term pacemaker dependency following TAVI.

Methods

Single center prospectively included patients that underwent pacemaker implantation following TAVI (March 2017 to September 2020). Patients who were lost to follow up, with bicuspid aortic valve, previously implanted PM and non-available or low quality MSCT exam were excluded. On MSCT, MS length was measured on modified coronal view, the aortic-valvular complex (AVC) was characterized by leaflet sector and calcium distribution was assessed on a J-score threshold of 850-Hounsfield units. Pacemaker dependency was assessed by reducing ventricular pacing to 30 bpm and defined by subsequent complete AV dissociation in patients in sinus rhythm or an escape rhythm <50 bpm in atrial fibrillation, in addition of >90% pacing percentage since implantation.

Results

From the 352 patients with inclusion criteria, 67 underwent PM implantation (19%) and 55 included in the analysis (male 33.9%, median age=85) (Figure). Median time for pacemaker implantation was 3 days [interquartile range (IQR) 3–5 days], mostly due to complete auriculo-ventricular block (76.4%, N=42). PM dependency occurred in 14 out of 55 (25.5%) patients at mean follow up of 500±363 days. Patients with PM dependency tended to have deeper implantation depth, (6.2 mm vs 5.5 mm, p=0.096) and a significantly shorter MS (5.8 mm vs 6.8 mm, P-value = 0.031) (Table). Increasing MS length was independently associated with a lower risk of PM dependency [odds ratio (OR) 0.58 per mm; 95% CI: 0.35–0.98, p=0.04] regardless prosthesis choice. MS length under 5 mm had 97.6% specificity (95% CI: 87.1–99.9) and 85.7% positive predictive value for pacemaker dependency (AUC=76.7; 95% CI 63.3–87).

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the importance of MSCT-derived MS length to stratify the risk of long term need for pacemaker. Patients with short MS (<5mm) in addition to conduction abnormality following TAVI had a high likelihood of PM dependency on the long term and should be considered for prompt PM implantation.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Validation of a novel framework defining the acceptable standard of care for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Background

In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), uptitration of neurohormonal antagonists to trial-proven doses shown to reduce mortality is challenging and seldomly achieved in clinical practice. A major reason for underdosing of these agents is the lack of a clear description of what constitutes an acceptable standard of care in HFrEF. To address this limitation, a novel framework for describing the physician adherence to evidence-based treatment was recently proposed. The aim of our study was to evaluate and validate the proposed framework in a real-world population of patients with HFrEF.

Methods

A cohort of patients with HFrEF, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, under treatment with neurohormonal antagonists for at least 3 months were retrospectively identified at a tertiary hospital's Heart Failure Clinic. Demographic, clinical, echocardiographic and treatment data were assessed. Patients were divided in three strata for each neurohormonal antagonist, according to the proposed framework: Status I – patients receiving target doses or the highest tolerated dose; Status II – use of subtarget doses for reasons unrelated to clinically important intolerance; and Status III – not receiving the drug at any dose. The prognostic value of each strata was assessed for all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 408 patients (mean age 68±12 years, 78% male, 63% ischemic etiology) were included. The median LVEF was 31% (IQR 25–36) and most patients were in NYHA class II or III [210 (51.5%) and 163 (40%), respectively]. Medical therapy is described in Table 1. During a median follow-up of 3.3 years (IQR 1.4–5.6), 210 patients died. On univariable analysis, achieving Status I of beta-blocker (BB) therapy (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.32–0.81; P=0.004) or ACEi/ARB (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.36–0.86; P=0.012) was associated with reduced all-cause mortality. The mortality of patients in Status II of BB or ACEi/ARB was similar to the mortality of those not receiving the drug (HR for BB: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.53–1.52; P=0.69 and HR for ACEi/ARB: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.42–1.18; P=0.182) – figure 1. Achieving Status I of BB remained independently associated with reduced mortality after adjustment for several clinical and echocardiographic confounders (n=13) (adjusted HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.35–0.98; P=0.041).

Conclusions

In this real-world population of patients with HFrEF, the vast majority of patients were in Status I of BB and ACEi/ARB therapy. Achieving Status I of BB therapy seems to be associated with reduced mortality, even after adjustment for several markers of disease severity, highlighting the need for uptitration of medical therapy to maximal tolerated doses according to trial-proven regimens.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery with interarterial course: red flag or innocent bystander?

Aims

Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the opposite sinus (right-ACAOS) with interarterial course (IAC) has been associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Widespread use of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has led to increasing recognition of this condition, even among healthy individuals. Our study sought to examine the prevalence, anatomical characteristics and outcomes of right-ACAOS with IAC in patients undergoing CCTA for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods and results

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred for CCTA at one tertiary hospital from January 2012 to December 2020. Right-ACAOS with IAC patients were analyzed for cardiac symptoms and long-term occurrence of first MACE (SCD, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or revascularization of the anomalous vessel). CCTAs were reviewed for anatomical high-risk features and concomitant CAD. Among 10928 patients referred for CCTA, 28 patients with right-ACAOS with IAC were identified. Mean age was 55±17 years, 64% were male and 11 (39.3%) presented with stable cardiac symptoms. Most patients had at least one high risk anatomical feature. During follow-up, there were no CV deaths or aborted SCD episodes and only 1 patient underwent surgical revascularization of the anomalous vessel.

Conclusion

Right-ACAOS with IAC is an uncommon finding (prevalence of 0.26%). In a contemporary population of predominantly asymptomatic patients who survived this condition well into adulthood, most patients were managed conservatively with a low event rate. Additional studies are needed to support medical follow-up as the preferred option in this setting.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Regurgitant volume to left ventricular end-diastolic volume ratio: the quest to identify Disproportionate MR is not over

Background

Quantification of secondary mitral valve regurgitation (SMR) remains challenging. Proportionate and Disproportionate SMR provides a conceptual framework that relates the degree of SMR to left ventricular dilatation and dysfunction. In line with this concept, regurgitant volume to LV end-diastolic volume ratio (Rvol/LVEDV) was recently proposed as a possible strategy to identify patients with Disproportionate SMR. The aim of this study was to validate this approach in a Portuguese cohort.

Methods

In a single center cohort of patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF <50%) under optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), we retrospectively identified those with at least moderate SMR. According to the published literature, we divided the study population into 2 risk groups: those with a Rvol/LVEDV ratio ≥20% (greater MR/smaller LVEDV) and those with a ratio <20% (smaller MR/ larger EDV). Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to assess the association between Rvol/LVEDV ratio and all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 154 patients (mean age 69±12 years; 81% male) were included. Mean LVEF was 31±8% and median LVEDV was 193 mL (IQR: 155 to 236 mL). There were 74 patients (48.1%) with a Rvol/LVEDV ratio <20% and 80 patients (51.9%) Rvol/LVEDV ratio ≥20%. Regarding GDMT, 141 (91.6%) received beta-blockers, 139 (90.3%) angiotensin converting–enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and 77 (50.0%) were under mineralocorticoid therapy. Also, there were patients 49 (31.8%) under cardiac resynchronization therapy and 40 patients (26.0%) had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. During a median follow-up of 2.1 years (IQR 0.7 to 3.8 years), 92 (59.7%) patients died. Cox regression and survival analysis showed no mortality difference between patients with a Rvol/LVEDV ratio <20% and those with a ratio ≥20% (HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.69–1.57; P=0.854; Log-rank P=0.967) – see also figure.

Conclusion

In a Portuguese cohort of HFrEF patients under optimized GDMT and with at least moderate SMR, the Rvol/LVEDV ratio was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. As such, the Rvol/LVEDV ratio does not seem to be a reliable surrogate of Disproportionate SMR, possibly because it does not account for the degree of LV dysfunction.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Incorporating coronary calcification into pretest assessment of the likelihood of coronary artery disease: validation and recalibration of a new diagnostic tool

Background

A new clinical tool was recently proposed to improve the estimation of pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) by incorporating coronary artery calcium score (CACS) with clinical risk factors. This new model (Clinical+CACS) showed improved prediction when compared to the method recommended by the 2019 ESC guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes, but was never tested or adjusted for use in our population. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of this new method in a Portuguese cohort of symptomatic patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and to recalibrate it if necessary.

Methods

We conducted a two-center cross-sectional study assessing symptomatic patients who underwent CCTA for suspected CAD. Key exclusion criteria were age <30 years, known CAD, suspected acute coronary syndrome, or symptoms other than chest pain or dyspnea. Obstructive CAD was defined as any luminal stenosis ≥50% on CCTA. The Clinical+CACS prediction model was assessed for discrimination and calibration. A logistical recalibration of the model was conducted in a random sample of 50% of the patients and subsequently validated in the other half.

Results

A total of 1910 patients (mean age 60±11 years, 60% women) were included in the analysis. Symptom characteristics were: 39% non-anginal chest pain, 30% atypical angina, 19% dyspnea and 12% typical angina. The observed prevalence of obstructive CAD was 12.9% (n=247). Patients with obstructive CAD were more often male, were significantly older, had higher prevalence of typical angina and cardiovascular risk factors, and higher CACS values. The new Clinical+CACS tool showed greater discriminative power than the ESC 2019 prediction model, with a C-statistic of 0.83 (CI 95% 0.81–0.86) versus 0.67 (CI 95% 0.64–0.71), respectively (p-value for comparison <0.001). Before recalibration, the Clinical+CACS model underestimated the likelihood of CAD in our population across all quartiles of pretest probability (mean relative underestimation of 49%), which was subsequently corrected by the recalibration procedure - Figure.

Conclusions

In a Portuguese cohort of symptomatic patients undergoing CCTA for suspected CAD, the new Clinical+CACS model showed better discrimination power than the 2019 ESC method. The underestimation of the Clinical+CACS model was corrected by recalibrating it for our population. This new tool might prove useful for guiding decisions on the need for further testing.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

The gray zone of myocardial fibrosis is a better predictor of ventricular arrhythmias than total myocardial fibrosis in patients with previous myocardial infarction

Background

Current sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification relies heavily on the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but markers that could refine risk assessment are needed. Total fibrosis mass (TFM) and “gray zone” of myocardial fibrosis (GZF) on late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) have been proposed as potential arrhythmogenic substrates. The aim of our study was to determine whether TFM and GZF can predict the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with previous myocardial infarction.

Methods

We performed a single centre retrospective study enrolling all consecutive patients with previous myocardial infarction undergoing LGE-CMR before implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation for primary or secondary prevention. TFM and GZF were defined as myocardial tissue with signal-intensities >6 SD and 2–6 SD above the mean of reference myocardium, respectively. The primary endpoint was a composite of sudden arrhythmic death, appropriate ICD shock, ventricular fibrillation (VF), or sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) as detected by the device.

Results

A total of 55 patients (mean age 62±12 years, 87% male, mean LVEF 30% ± 8%) were included. During a mean follow-up period of 34±15 months, 10 patients reached the primary endpoint (8 appropriate ICD shock, 2 sustained VT or VF). Patients who attained the primary endpoint had similar TFM (28.6g ± 14.5 vs. 23.1g ± 14.5; P=0.283) but larger GZF (25.3g ± 11.0 vs 15.6g ± 7.3; P=0.001). After adjustment for LVEF, GZF remained independently associated with the composite arrhythmic endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03–1.17; P=0.005), whereas TFM did not (aHR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.98–1.06; P=0.394). Decision tree analysis identified 16.4g of GZF as the best cut-off to predict life-threatening arrhythmic events. The primary endpoint occurred in 9 out of the 22 patients (41%) with GZF >16.4g, but in only 1 of the 33 patients (3%) with GZF ≤16.4g – Figure.

Conclusions

The extent of GZF seems to be a better predictor of ventricular arrhythmias than TFM. This LGE-CMR parameter may be useful to identify a subgroup of patients with previous myocardial infarction at an increased risk of life-threatening arrhythmic events.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

The odyssey to dethrone LV ejection fraction continues: the prognostic value of LV global function index in heart failure

Background

Left Ventricular (LV) Global Function index (LVGFi) is a parameter that combines data from global systolic performance and volumetric anatomical information, measurable by non-contrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR). We aimed to evaluate whether LVGFi predicts major cardiovascular outcomes and outperforms LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in Heart Failure (HF).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective single-centre study of consecutive patients with HF who were referred to and had a LVEF <50% at CMR. Other than inadequate images for endocardial or epicardial border delineation, there were no exclusion criteria. LVEF was determined by 3D measurement. LVGFi was calculated as the LV stroke volume to the LV global volume ratio (Figure 1). The primary endpoint was a composite of time to all-cause death or HF hospitalization.

Results

The cohort was comprised of 433 HF patients (mean age 64±12 years, 74.1% male, ischaemic HF 53.1%, NYHA I-II 83.9%) with a mean LVEF of 33.5±10.0% and LVGFi of 22.8±7.4%. Over a median follow-up of 27 (17–37) months, 85 (19.6%) met the primary endpoint and 42 (9.7%) died. Patients with an event of the primary endpoint had markers of more severe HF, as noted by a reduced functional capacity (NYHA I-II: 63.5 vs. 89.0%; p<0.001) and increased natriuretic peptides [NT-proBNP: 2664 (1022–27242) vs. 791 (337–7258); p<0.001). Likewise, CMR showed higher LV volumes (e.g., LV end-diastolic volume index: 137±50 vs. 120±43mL/m2; p=0.001) and reduced LV performance indices, namely LVEF (29.2±10.6 vs 34.5±9.6%; p<0.001) and LVGFi (19.8±7.4 vs 23.6±7.3%; p<0.001). Both LVEF and LVGFi independently predicted the primary endpoint in multivariate analysis (separately imputed into a model adjusted for NYHA, NT-proBNP and creatinine). The LVEF model was more powerful than that of LVGFi. Similarly, LVGFi did not provide incremental prognostic information over LVEF in c-statistics analysis (0.653 vs. 0.622; p=0.645) (Figure 2).

Conclusion

While LVGFi independently predicted major outcomes in patients with HF and LVEF <50%, it did not surpass LVEF. Our findings contrast to those demonstrating LVGFi as a powerful variable that outperforms LVEF in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, and healthy subjects at risk of developing structural heart disease. We hypothesize that LVGFi might be primarily useful in the prognostic stratification of patients with preserved LVEF.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1Figure 2

Coronary artery calcium score to predict coronary CT angiography interpretability. An old problem revisited

Introduction

Clinical guidelines recommend against the use of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with heavy calcification due to interpretability concerns, but no specific approach or threshold is provided. Recently, alternative methods have been proposed as more reliable predictors of CCTA interpretability than the classic coronary artery calcium score (CACS). The purpose this study was to compare the performance of different measures of coronary calcification as predictors of CCTA interpretability.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing CACS and CCTA between 2018 and 2020. The key exclusion criteria were known coronary artery disease, CACS of zero, and presence of non-assessable coronary lesions for reasons other than calcification (movement/gating artifacts or vessel diameter <2mm). CCTA studies were considered non-interpretable if the main reader considered one or more coronary lesions non-assessable due to calcification. Three different measures of coronary calcification were compared using ROC curve analysis: 1) total CACS; 2) CACS-to-lesion ratio (total CACS divided by the number of calcified plaques); and 3) calcium score of the most calcified plaque. Decision-tree analysis was performed to identify the algorithm that best predicts CCTA interpretability.

Results

A total of 432 patients (191 women, mean age 64±11 years) were included. Overall, 31 patients (7.2%) had a non-interpretable CCTA due to calcification. Patients with non-interpretable CCTA had higher CACS (median 589 vs. 50 AU, p<0.001), higher CACS-to-lesion ratio (median 43 vs. 14 AU/lesion, p<0.001), and higher score of the most calcified plaque (median 445 vs. 43 AU, p<0.001). Among the 3 methods, CACS showed the highest discriminative power to predict a non-interpretable CCTA (C-statistic 0.93, 95% CI 0.89–0.95, p<0.001) – Figure 1.

Decision-tree analysis identified a single-variable algorithm (CACS value ≤515 AU) as the best discriminator of CCTA interpretability: 396 of the 409 patients (97%) with CACS ≤515 AU had an interpretable CCTA, whereas only 5 of the 23 patients (22%) with CACS >515 AU had an interpretable test, yielding a total of 96% correct predictions.

Conclusions

The recently proposed and more complex measures of coronary calcification seem unable to outperform total CACS as a predictor of CCTA interpretability. A simple CACS cutoff-value around 500 AU remains the best discriminator for this purpose.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1

Prevalence and determinants of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with severe symptomatic high gradient aortic stenosis

Background

Right ventricular (RV) function in aortic stenosis (AS) has been largely neglected. Recently it was demonstrated that right ventricular impairment may be influenced by left ventricular (LV) function and afterload, well before overt pulmonary hypertension development.

Aim

To describe the prevalence of RV dysfunction in a group of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) and its relation to LV function parameters and afterload.

Methods

We prospectively studied 93 consecutive patients (age: 73 years [IQR 68–77] years, 55% women) with pure severe symptomatic high gradient aortic stenosis: mean transaortic pressure gradient: 57.0mmHg [IQR 46.9–71.1]; aortic valve area: 0.72cm2 [IQR 0.61–0.88]; indexed stroke volume: 48.8±1.5 mL/m2 (11 patients with low-flow AS), preserved LV ejection fraction (EV) (LVEF: 56.0% [51.0–61.3]; GLS: −14.5% [IQR −16.1 to −10.6]), with no previous coronary artery disease and no history of cardiomyopathy. Beyond complete transthoracic echocardiography, all patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for LV myocardium tissue characterization (late gadolinium enhancement and extracellular volume). Normal RV function was defined according to TAPSE ≥17mm, tricuspid annular systolic velocity ≥12cm/s, mean free wall longitudinal strain ≤−20%. Patients were divided into four groups: (0) – all three RV parameters below normal (1.1%), (1) – 1 normal parameter (12.9%), (2) – 2 normal parameters (44.1%), (3) – 3 normal parameters (41.9%). Indexes of LV systolic and diastolic function, CMR derived LV geometric remodeling, hypertrophy and tissue characterization, aortic valve disease severity and afterload were compared across the 4 groups of patients. We tried to identify predictors of RV dysfunction (group 0, 1, 2 vs. group 3) at multivariate regression analysis.

Results

Left ventricular performance parameters, diastolic and myocardial work indexes were significantly different across the groups (Figure). Neither AV severity indexes nor LV tissue characterization were distinct. At multivariate analysis only global constructive work was an independent predictor of RV dysfunction.

Conclusion

RV dysfunction is common in this group of patients with severe high gradient aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. RV impairment is significantly related to several LV systolic and diastolic parameters and also to LV afterload, probably accounting for RV-LV interdependence.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Coronary artery calcium score to predict coronary CT angiography interpretability: an old problem revisited

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Introduction

Clinical guidelines recommend against the use of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with heavy calcification due to interpretability concerns, but no specific approach or threshold is provided. Recently, alternative methods have been proposed as more reliable predictors of CCTA interpretability than the classic coronary artery calcium score (CACS).  The purpose this study was to compare the performance of different measures of coronary calcification as predictors of CCTA interpretability.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing CACS and CCTA between 2018 and 2020. The key exclusion criteria were known coronary artery disease, CACS of zero, and presence of non-assessable coronary lesions for reasons other than calcification (movement/gating artifacts or vessel diameter < 2mm). CCTA studies were considered non-interpretable if the main reader considered one or more coronary lesions non-assessable due to calcification. Three different measures of coronary calcification were compared using ROC curve analysis: 1) total CACS; 2) CACS-to-lesion ratio (total CACS divided by the number of calcified plaques); and 3) calcium score of the most calcified plaque. Decision-tree analysis was performed to identify the algorithm that best predicts CCTA interpretability.

Results

A total of 432 patients (191 women, mean age 64 ± 11 years) were included. Overall, 31 patients (7.2%) had a non-interpretable CCTA due to calcification. Patients with non-interpretable CCTA had higher CACS (median 589 vs. 50 AU, p < 0.001), higher CACS-to-lesion ratio (median 43 vs. 14 AU/lesion, p < 0.001), and higher score of the most calcified plaque (median 445 vs. 43 AU, p < 0.001). Among the 3 methods, CACS showed the highest discriminative power to predict a non-interpretable CCTA (C-statistic 0.93, 95%CI 0.89-0.95, p < 0.001) - Figure.

Decision-tree analysis identified a single-variable algorithm (CACS value ≤ 515 AU) as the best discriminator of CCTA interpretability: 396 of the 409 patients (97%) with CACS ≤ 515 AU had an interpretable CCTA, whereas only 5 of the 23 patients (22%) with CACS > 515 AU had an interpretable test, yielding a total of 96% correct predictions.

Conclusions

The recently proposed and more complex measures of coronary calcification seem unable to outperform total CACS as a predictor of CCTA interpretability. A simple CACS cutoff-value around 500 AU remains the best discriminator for this purpose.

Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery with interarterial course: red flag or innocent bystander?

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery (right ACAOS) with interarterial course (IAC) has been associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Widespread use of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has led to increasing recognition of this condition, even among healthy individuals. This study sought to examine the prevalence, anatomical characteristics and outcomes of right ACAOS with IAC in patients undergoing CCTA for all-indications.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred for CCTA at one tertiary hospital between January 2012 and December 2020. Right ACAOS patients with IAC were analyzed for cardiac symptoms (anginal chest pain, syncope, aborted SCD) and long-term outcomes were evaluated for myocardial infarction, ischemic test results, revascularization procedures and all-cause or cardiovascular (CV) mortality. CCTAs were reviewed for proposed high-risk features (ie., take-off angle, length and severity of proximal narrowing, intramural course, interarterial length) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD). Association between high-risk features was analyzed. Long-term outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Among 10,928 patients referred for CCTA during the study period, we identified 28 patients (0.3% prevalence) with right ACAOS and IAC. Mean age was 55 ± 17 years, 64% were male and 11 (39.3%) presented cardiac symptoms. During a median follow-up of 44.1 ± 31.8 months, there were no CV deaths and only 1 patient (3.65%) underwent surgical revascularization. Baseline characteristics and CCTA findings are presented in figure 1.

Conclusion

Right ACAOS and IAC is an uncommon finding, with an observed prevalence of 0.3%. CCTA provides excellent anatomical characterization of anomalous vessels, including suggested high-risk features. In a population of asymptomatic patients who survived this condition well into adulthood, the risk of events was very low and medical follow up might be a reasonable option.

Incorporating coronary calcification into pretest assessment of the likelihood of coronary artery disease: validation and recalibration of a new diagnostic tool

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

A new clinical tool was recently proposed to improve the estimation of pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) by incorporating coronary artery calcium score (CACS) with clinical risk factors. This new model (Clinical + CACS) showed improved prediction when compared to the method recommended by the 2019 ESC guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes, but was never tested or adjusted for use in our population. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of this new method in a Portuguese cohort of symptomatic patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and to recalibrate it if necessary.

Methods

We conducted a two-center cross-sectional study assessing symptomatic patients who underwent CCTA for suspected CAD. Key exclusion criteria were age < 30 years, known CAD, suspected acute coronary syndrome, or symptoms other than chest pain or dyspnea. Obstructive CAD was defined as any luminal stenosis ≥50% on CCTA. The Clinical + CACS prediction model was assessed for discrimination and calibration. A logistical recalibration of the model was conducted in a random sample of 50% of the patients and subsequently validated in the other half.

Results

A total of 1910 patients (mean age 60 ± 11 years, 60% women) were included in the analysis. Symptom characteristics were: 39% non-anginal chest pain, 30% atypical angina, 19% dyspnea and 12% typical angina. The observed prevalence of obstructive CAD was 12.9% (n = 247). Patients with obstructive CAD were more often male, were significantly older, had higher prevalence of typical angina and cardiovascular risk factors, and higher CACS values. The new Clinical + CACS tool showed greater discriminative power than the ESC 2019 prediction model, with a C-statistic of 0.83 (CI 95% 0.81-0.86) versus 0.67 (CI 95% 0.64-0.71), respectively (p-value for comparison < 0.001). Before recalibration, the Clinical + CACS model underestimated the likelihood of CAD in our population across all quartiles of pretest probability (mean relative underestimation of 49%), which was subsequently corrected by the recalibration procedure - Figure.

Conclusions

In a Portuguese cohort of symptomatic patients undergoing CCTA for suspected CAD, the new Clinical + CACS model showed better discrimination power than the 2019 ESC method. The underestimation of the Clinical + CACS model was corrected by recalibrating it for our population. This new tool might prove useful for guiding decisions on the need for further testing.

Patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography after a positive single-photon emission computed tomography or a positive stress cardiac magnetic resonance - What to expect at the cath lab

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

 Randomized controlled trials comparing stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) suggest similar diagnostic accuracy for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there are few data on whether or not this remains true in routine clinical practice.

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) after a positive stress CMR or positive SPECT, and to compare their positive predictive value with published results from the CE-MARC trial.

Methods

In this retrospective tertiary-center analysis, we included 429 patients (mean age 67 ± 10 years, 28% women, 42% diabetic) undergoing ICA between January 2016 and December 2020, after a positive stress CMR or positive SPECT. Regarding stress test, an adenosine protocol was performed in all stress CMR and in 76.4% (n = 272) of stress SPECT. 

Stress test results, including ischemia location and severity, were classified as reported by their primary readers. Patients with missing data on key variables, and those in whom microvascular disease was considered likely in the original stress test report were excluded. Obstructive CAD was defined as any coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50% in a vessel compatible with the ischemic territory on stress testing.

Results

Out of the total 429 patients, 356 (83%) were referred after a positive SPECT, and 73 (17%) after a positive stress CMR. Patients did not differ regarding age, cardiovascular risk factors, previous revascularization or left ventricular dysfunction, but patients with SPECT were more frequently male (p = 0.046). Overall, 320 patients (75%) had obstructive CAD on ICA. The prevalence of obstructive CAD was similar in patients with positive SPECT vs. positive stress CMR (76.1% vs. 80.8%, respectively, p = 0.385). There were also no significant differences in the prevalence of left main or 3-vessel disease (9.0% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.871, and 19.7% vs. 23.3% p = 0.483, respectively). Revascularization was performed or planned in 59.3% of patients in the SPECT group, and 52.1% of those in the stress CMR group (p = 0.255). The positive predictive values of both techniques were similar to those reported in the CE-MARC trial (Figure), and would increase to 88.1% and 89.4% for SPECT and stress CMR, respectively, if patients reported as having only mild ischemia were excluded.

Conclusion

In this tertiary center analysis, stress CMR and SPECT showed similar positive predictive values, comparable to those reported in the CE-MARC trial.

POS0496 YOUNG VERSUS LATE-ONSET RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A PROSPECTIVE 12 MONTH-FOLLOW-UP COHORT STUDY IN AN EARLY ARTHRITIS COHORT

Background:

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory arthropathy that can present at any age. Data regarding differences in the clinical course and outcome in Late-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (LORA) comparing to Young-Onset RA (YORA) are conflicting. Some studies suggested that LORA may represent a more benign form of RA (1), while others have shown a poorer prognosis in these patients (2,3). Only a few publications have included patients with early disease (3).

Objectives:

To compare demographic and clinical features between LORA and YORA patients, and clinical activity at baseline and after 12 months of initial therapy, in patients with early disease.

Methods:

We conducted a prospective cohort study of 12 months of follow-up based on an early arthritis clinic. Consecutive patients with early RA – less than 12 months duration – fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2010 and/or ACR 1987 RA classification criteria, were included and classified in LORA (disease onset ≥60 years) and YORA groups. Variables were collected from patients’ registries at first appointment after symptoms onset and after 12 months of treatment, according to a treat-to-target strategy. Independent t-test and chi-square test were performed to compare variables between groups.

Results:

We included 72 patients (40 (55.6%) YORA; 32 (44.4%) LORA), mean age at diagnosis 44.9±1.78 and 72.5± 1.34 years, respectively. In LORA group, the symptoms duration at first observation was shorter (17.0±2.26 vs. 23.8±2.45 weeks; p=0.046) and rheumatoid factor (RF)/ anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) positivity was lower (28.1% vs 65.0%; p= 0.002; 31.3% vs 72.5%; p<0.001). At baseline, LORA had higher mean number of tender joints (9.76±1.29 vs 6.50±0.67; p=0.021), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (45.7±4.98 vs. 29.3±3.74; p=0.011), C-reactive protein (CRP) (4.63±0.91 vs 2.22±0.46; p=0.022) and disease activity using DAS28-3V (5.11±0.28 vs 4.42±0.19; p=0.046), CDAI (33.7±3.39 vs 23.6±2.18; p=0.015) and SDAI (37.4±3.43 vs 26.3±2.57; p=0.015). At the end of follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences between LORA and YORA groups regarding treatment, disease activity and patient-reported outcomes at 12 months (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical variables assessment at 12 months of follow-up.

EORAYORAp-valueTreatment, % users Corticosteroids93.397.4p= 0.576 Methotrexate76.774.4p=0.825 Hydroxychloroquine43.346.2p= 0.815 Sulfasalazine10.015.4p=0.722 Leflunomide3.305.10p=1.000 TNF blockers3.305.10p=0.717DAS28-3V, mean (SD)1.99±0.152.22±0.15p=0.286SDAI, mean (SD)4.64±1.357.68±1.39p=0.128CDAI, mean (SD)4.15±1.176.56±1.32p=0.180Swollen joints, mean (SD)1.29±0.491.03±0.25p=0.613Tender joints, mean (SD)0.32±0.131.28±0.53p=0.084ESR, mean (SD)10.6±1.799.43±1.14p=0.585CRP, mean (SD)0.44±0.090.50±0.15p=0.730PtGA, mean (SD)21.8±5.9029.2±6.11p=0.387PhGA, mean (SD)10.6±3.2613.1±3.11p= 0.593Pain intensity (VAS), mean (SD)20.7±5.8232.7±6.30p=0.169HAQ, mean (SD)0.23±0.0890.54±0.13p=0.060

Legend: DMARD- disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug; TNF- tumoral necrosis factor; SDAI-simplified disease activity score; CDAI- clinical disease activity score; PtGA/ PhGA – patient’s/ physician’s global assessment of general health; VAS- visual analogic scale; HAQ- health assessment questionnaire.

Conclusion:

LORA patients presented with higher disease activity manifested by higher joint counts and laboratory inflammatory markers but lower RF and ACPA positivity proportion. Despite the more aggressive clinical presentation, the clinical and functional outcomes at 12 months were similar between LORA and YORA patients.

References:

[1]Deal et al. Arthritis Rheum 1985;28(9):987-94.

[2]Arnold et al. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014; 53:10751086.

[3]Romão et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2020;0(4):735-743.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Calcium score of the aortic valve as a predictor of aortic stenosis severity

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

The calcium score of the aortic valve (CaScAoV) is now recommended as a supporting tool to assist in the grading of aortic stenosis (AS) severity when echocardiographic assessment is inconclusive. However, the proposed CaScAoV cut-offs for considering severe AS "unlikely", "likely", or "very likely" have never been validated in Portuguese cohorts.

Aim

The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of the proposed CaScAoV cut-offs in identifying patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Methods

A total of 513 consecutive patients (median age 83 years [IQR 79–87], 38% males) evaluated at a single-centre TAVI-programme between Jan/2016 and Nov/2019 were retrospectively identified. Only patients with an ECG-gated cardiac computed tomography (CT) and a transthoracic echocardiography performed within a 6-month time-frame were included. Main exclusion criteria were left ventricular ejection fraction &lt; 50%, indexed stroke volume &lt; 35 ml/m2, previous valve surgery and

bicuspid aortic disease. CaScAoV was measured according to the Agatston method (Agatston units – AU). As previously reported, the likelihood of aortic stenosis as assessed by CT was categorized as: "very likely" (&gt;3000 AU for men, &gt;1600 AU for women); "likely" (&gt;2000 AU for men, &gt;1200 AU for women) ; or unlikely (&lt;1600 AU for men, &lt;800 AU for women). Diagnostic tests performance measures were calculated for each category. Separate analyses were performed for each gender.

Results

Severe AS (mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg) was present in 422 patients (overall 82.3%: 83.1% in females and 80.8% in males), with a median transvalvular gradient of 49 mmHg (IQR 42 – 60).

Overall, the discriminative ability of the CaScAoV to distinguish severe from non-severe AS was higher in men when compared with women (c-statistic 0.86 [95%CI 0.80 – 0.93] vs. 0.72 [95%CI 0.64 – 0.80], p for comparison &lt; 0.001). In males, the "very likely" cut-off had a sensitivity of 71% (95%CI 63 – 78%), a specificity of 81% (95%CI 65 – 92%), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 94% (95%CI 89 – 97%) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 40% (95%CI 33 – 46%) for the diagnosis of severe AS. Conversely, in women the sensitivity was 75% (95%CI 69 – 80%), specificity was 57% (95%CI 43 – 71%), PPV was 90% (95%CI 86 – 92%) and NPV was 32% (95%CI 25 – 39%).

On the other end of the spectrum, the "unlikely" cut-off showed poor performance in dismissing severe AS, particularly in females – NPV of 43% (95%CI 25-63%) in women vs. 83% (95%CI 63-93%) in men.

Conclusion

In our population, the discriminative power of CaScAoV for identifying patients with severe AS was lower than in previously published cohorts, particularly in females. While very high CaScAoV is strongly supportive of severe AS, caution should be employed when interpreting low CaScAoV values in women, since the recommended cut-off value does not allow the safe exclusion of severe aortic stenosis.

Abstract Figure. Waterfall chart of individuals CaScAoV

Adapting the concepts of proportionate and disproportionate functional mitral regurgitation to clinical practice

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

  Despite its theoretical appeal, the concept of Proportionate and Disproportionate FMR has been limited by the lack of a simple way to assess it and by the paucity of data showing its prognostic superiority over currently established ways of grading FMR.

Objectives

This study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of a new and individualized method of assessing Functional Mitral Regurgitation (FMR) Proportionality.

Methods

Patients with at least mild FMR and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (&lt; 50%) under optimal guideline-directed medical therapy were retrospectively identified at a single-center. To determine FMR proportionality status, we used a novel approach where two simple equations establish an individual cut-off of regurgitant volume/effective regurgitant orifice area, categorizing the study population into non-severe, proportionate and disproportionate FMR (Figure 1). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 572 patients (median age 70 years; 76% male) were included. Median LVEF was 35% (IQR 28-40) and LVEDV was 169 ml (IQR 132-215). Disproportionate FMR was present in 109 patients (19%) with a median EROA of 26 mm2 (IQR 22-31) and a median RegVol of 40 ml (IQR 34-48), proportionate FMR in 148 patients (26%) with a median EROA of 16mm2 (IQR 12-21) and a median RegVol of 26 ml (IQR 19-32). During a median follow-up of 3.8 years (interquartile range: 1.8 to 6.2 years) there were 254 deaths (44%). The unadjusted mortality incidence per 100 persons-year rose as the degree of FMR disproportionality worsened. On multivariable analysis, disproportionate FMR remained independently associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.785; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.249 to 2.550; P = 0.001). The FMR proportionality concept showed greater discriminative power (C-statistic 0.639; 95% CI: 0.597 to 0.680) than the American (C-statistic 0.588; 95% CI: 0.550 to 0.626; P for comparison = .001) and European guidelines (C-statistic 0.563; 95% CI: 0.534 to 0.591; P for comparison &lt; .001). It was also able to increase the net reclassification index (0.167 [P &lt; 0.001] and 0.084 [P = 0.001], respectively).

Conclusions

A new, simplified and individualized method of assessing FMR Proportionality showed that disproportionate FMR is independently associated with all-cause mortality. This approach seems to outperform the risk stratification of current guidelines.

Abstract Figure 1

Regurgitant volume to left ventricular end-diastolic volume ratio: another step to risk stratification in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation?

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

 Quantitative evaluation of secondary mitral valve regurgitation (MR) remains an important yet challenging step in the evaluation of this entity. Its severity can be underestimated when using the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method, which does not take left ventricular (LV) volume into account. Normalizing mitral regurgitant volume (Rvol) for the LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) might overcome this key limitation. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic implication of Rvol/EDV ratio in patients with secondary MR.

Methods

 Patients with at least mild secondary MR and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (&lt;50%) under optimal guidelines-directed medical therapy were retrospectively identified at a single-center. The cohort was divided into terciles according to the RVol/EDV ratio. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

Results

 A total of 572 patients (median age 70 years; 76% male) were included. Median LVEF was 35% (IQR 28-40) and LVEDV was 169 ml (IQR 132-215). Median measures of secondary MR were EROA 14 mm2 (IQR 8-22) and RegVol 23 ml (12-34). During a median follow-up of 3.8 years (interquartile range 1.8 to 6.2 years) there were 254 deaths (44%). The unadjusted mortality incidence increases across terciles distribution. Patients at the 2nd and 3rd terciles of the RVol/EDV ratio showed significantly higher mortality when compared to those at the 1st one (baseline reference) (figure 1). After multivariable analysis, terciles of the Rvol/EDV ratio remained independently associated with increased all-cause mortality (considering the 1st tercile as the reference; adjusted HR for the 2nd tercile 1.46 [95% CI 1.05- 2.02]  p = 0.023; adjusted HR for 3rd tercile 1.56 [95% CI 1.09 – 2.22], p = 0.015).

Conclusion

 In patients with secondary MR, Rvol/EDV ratio is independently associated with all-cause mortality. However, the appropriate cut-off to determine any kind of clinical decision remains to be determined.

Abstract Figure.

External validation of the unifying concept for the quantitative assessment of secondary mitral regurgitation

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

  A Unifying Concept for the Quantitative Assessment of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation (SMR) was recently proposed in order to provide a solution for the ongoing guideline controversy. However, these data were derived from a single center cohort and lacks external validation. We aimed to validate the proposed algorithm in a different patient population.

Methods

Patients with at least mild SMR and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (&lt; 50%) under optimal guideline-directed medical therapy were retrospectively identified at a single-center. The cohort was stratified in low-risk (effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA] &lt; 20 mm2 and regurgitant volume [RegVol] &lt; 30 ml), intermediate-risk (EROA 20 to 29 mm2 and RegVol 30 to 44 ml) and high-risk (EROA ≥ 30 mm2 and RegVol ≥ 45ml) according to the defined risk-based thresholds tailored to the pathophysiological concept of SMR. In the intermediate-risk group, patients were further stratified on the basis of the hemodynamic severity of SMR, into intermediate low-risk and intermediate high-risk (regurgitant fraction &lt; 50% or ≥ 50%, respectively). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 572 patients (median age 70 years; 76% male) were included. Median LVEF was 35% (IQR 28-40) and LVEDV was 169 ml (IQR 132-215). Median measures of SMR severity were EROA of 14 mm2 (IQR 8-22) and RegVol of 23 ml (12-34). During a median follow-up of 3.8 years (interquartile range: 1.8 to 6.2 years) there were 254 deaths (44%). The mortality at 6-years was 38.9% for the low-risk group, 30.7% for the intermediate low-risk, 64.9% in the intermediate high-risk and 63.2% in the high-risk group. On multivariable analysis, the defined thresholds of risk for SMR severity remained independently associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.164; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.020 to 1.327; P = 0.024). The unifying concept showed similar discriminative power (C-statistic 0.588; 95% CI: 0.540 to 0.635) to the American (C-statistic 0.588; 95% CI: 0.541 to 0.635; P for comparison = 1) and European guidelines (C-statistic 0.563; 95% CI: 0.515 to 0.610; P for comparison = 0.458), but it was able to increase the net reclassification index (0.143 [P &lt; .001] and 0.026 [P = .025], respectively).

Conclusions

In this cohort of patients with SMR and LVEF &lt;50%, the proposed unifying concept based on combined assessment of the EROA, the RegVol, and the RegFrac proved to be associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and could improve risk prediction of current guidelines.

Abstract Figure.

Epicardial adipose tissue and atrial fibrillation: guilty as charged or guilty by association?

Background

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) has been linked to the presence and burden of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is still unclear whether this relationship is causal or simply a surrogate marker of other risk factors commonly associated with AF.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between these factors and EAT, and to compare their performance in predicting AF recurrence after an ablation procedure.

Methods

We assessed 575 consecutive patients (mean age 61±11 years, 62% male) undergoing AF ablation preceded by cardiac CT in a high-volume ablation center. EAT was measured on cardiac CT using a modified simplified method. Patients were divided into 2 groups (above vs. below the median EAT volume). Cox regression was used to assess the relationship between epicardial fat, risk factors, and AF relapse.

Results

Patients with above-median EAT volume were older (p&lt;0.001), more often male (OR 1.7, p=0.002), had higher body mass index, and higher prevalence of smoking, hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia (p&lt;0.05). Non-paroxysmal AF was also more common in those with above-median EAT volume. During a median follow-up of 18 months, 232 patients (40.3%) suffered AF recurrence. After adjustment for BMI and other univariate predictors of relapse, three variables emerged independently associated with time to AF recurrence: non-paroxysmal AF (HR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5–2.7, p&lt;0.001), indexed left atrial (LA) volume (HR 1.006 per mL/m2, 95% CI: 1.002–1.011, p&lt;0.001), and indexed epicardial fat volume (HR 1.87 per mL/m2, 95% CI: 1.66–2.1, p&lt;0.001). None of the classic cardiovascular risk factors were an independent predictor of AF recurrence (all p&gt;0.10).

Conclusion

Classic cardiovascular risk factors are more prevalent in patients with higher amounts of epicardial fat. However, unlike these risk factors, EAT is a powerful predictor of AF recurrence after ablation. These findings suggest that EAT is not merely a surrogate marker, but an important participant in the pathophysiology of AF.

EAT, cvrf and AF burden

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Who is too old for epicardial fat volume quantification?

Introduction

Epicardial adipose tissue has been implicated in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF) and was recently shown to be an independent predictor of AF relapse rate and severity after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, its impact in older patients hasn't been analyzed. The aim of this study was to assess the relative importance of pericardial fat in an older population of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

Methods

Single-center retrospective study of symptomatic drug-resistant AF patients undergoing PVI from November/2015 to June/2019. Baseline demographics, clinical and imaging data including cardiac CT and clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed. Population was dichotomized according to age above or below 70 years of age and groups were compared. Epicardial fat volume was quantified by contrast-enhanced cardiac CT using a semi-automated method. The study endpoint was symptomatic and/or documented AF recurrence after a 3-month blanking period.

Results

We assessed 575 patients (354 males, mean age 61±11 years, 449 paroxysmal AF), 145 of which were 70 or older. Compared to the younger cohort, these patients had an higher prevalence of women, lower BMI (27 kg/m2 [IQR 24–30] vs 28 kg/m2 [IQR 25–30] kg/m2, p=0.012), higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (3 [IQR 2–4] vs 1 [IQR 1–2], p&lt;0.001) and larger indexed left atrial volumes (61mL [IQR 52–84] vs 54mL [IQR 47–66], p&lt;0.001).

Median epicardial fat volume was 2.96 cm3/m2 [IQR 2.99–4.00] in the overall population and was higher in older patients (HR 2.21 cm3/m2 [IQR 1.44–3.17] vs HR 1.87 cm3/m2 [IQR 1.24–2.90]; p=0.016).

During follow-up, 232 patients relapsed (40%), with similar recurrence rates between younger and older patients (40% vs 42%, p=0.63) according to Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.82–1.48; log-rank p=0.519). Epicardial fat volume remained an independent predictor of AF relapse in the older subset of patients (HR 1.06 for every 1 cm3/m2 increase in epicardial fat volume [95% CI 1.28–2.00]; p&lt;0.001), as did the presence of non-paroxysmal AF (HR 2.78 [95% CI 1.48–5.21]; p=0.001).

Conclusion

Patients over 70 years old with drug-refractory symptomatic AF presented with higher epicardial fat volume. Epicardial fat burden showed similar predictive power for AF relapse after PVI in this subset of patients, representing a useful tool for intervention decision across this age spectrum.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

External validation of a new staging system for severe aortic stenosis in a Portuguese cohort

Background

Recently, a new staging system for severe aortic stenosis (AS) based upon the extent of extra-aortic-valve cardiac damage has been developed (Genereux et al. Eur Heart J 2017). The present study aimed to: 1) determine the prevalence of the different stages of extra-aortic valvular cardiac damage and its impact on prognosis in a real-world Portuguese cohort and; 2) evaluate the distribution of aortic valve calcium score (AV-CaSc) and its prognostic value.

Methods

Consecutive patients evaluated at a single-centre TAVI-programme between Nov/2015 and Nov/2018 were retrospective selected. The extent of extra-aortic valve cardiac damage was defined by echocardiography as stage 0 (no cardiac damage), stage 1 (left ventricular damage), stage 2 (mitral valve or left atrial damage), stage 3 (tricuspid valve or pulmonary artery vasculature damage) or stage 4 (right ventricular damage). AV-CaSc was estimated routinely at CT-angiography as per TAVI-programme protocol. The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality after CT-angiography. Survival analysis (Cox-regression hazards model and Kaplan-Meier) was performed. To account for the effect of aortic valve replacement (AVR), this variable entered the Cox-regression model as a time-dependent covariate.

Results

A total of 443 patients (mean age 82±7 years, 44% men, median euroSCORE II 4% [IQR 2.4–5.8]) were identified. After Heart Team discussion, 79% (n=349) underwent AVR (TAVI=307; surgical valve repair=42); 9% (n=42) await intervention; 6% (n=25) remain under medical treatment; 4% (n=19) died during the period of evaluation; and 2% (n=8) underwent palliative aortic balloon valvuloplasty.

According to the proposed classification, the distribution of patients from stages 0 through 4 was: 0.2% (n=1), 7.5% (n=34), 67.8% (n=306), 14% (n=63), and 10.4% (n=47). Additionally, for each increasing stage of cardiac damage, the burden of AV-CaSc was higher (from stage 1 through 4: 1776 [IQR 1217–2448]; 2448 [1796–3442]; 2448 [1832–3622]; 2960 [1936–4878] units; p for trend = 0.002).

All-cause mortality at 1-year was 14% (n=63). Mortality increased alongside with increasing extent of cardiac damage (from stage 0 through 4: 0% [n=0], 6% [n=2], 12% [n=36], 20% [n=12], and 30% [n=13]) – Fig. Multivariable analysis revealed chronic renal disease (HR 1.37 per stage [1.15–1.64], p&lt;0.001), AV-CaSc (HR 1.02 per 100 units [1.01–1.03], p=0.007), AVR (HR 0.46 [0.26–0.81], p=0.007) and stage of cardiac damage (HR 1.54 per stage [1.15–2.05], p=0.004) as independent predictors of 1-year mortality.

Conclusion

In a real-world Portuguese cohort of severe AS patients, the extent of cardiac damage was associated with 1-year mortality. AV- CaSc grants additional prognostic information to this classification. Incorporation of this staging system into patient evaluation may be useful in the risk assessment of severe AS.

Survival analysis

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None