Training primary care physicians to give limited manual therapy for low back pain: patient outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled study of standard manual therapy given by 31 generalist physicians to 295 patients, in primary care practice.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether training primary care physicians in techniques of limited manual therapy would result in improved outcomes for their patients with acute low back pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Controversy continues regarding the benefit of spinal manual therapy and the role of highly trained manual therapists in the care of low back pain. Continuing medical education in manual therapy is frequently offered to generalist physicians, but nothing is known of the value and effectiveness of this training.

METHODS

Thirty-one primary care physicians were trained to provide optimal low back care (enhanced care) and a sequence of eight standard manual therapy techniques. Two hundred ninety-five patients were randomized into two treatment groups: enhanced care alone and enhanced care with manual therapy. Main outcome measures included the Roland-Morris functional disability scale measured over time and patient-reported time to functional recovery, time to complete recovery, and satisfaction with care.

RESULTS

No differences were found in Roland-Morris scores over time, mean functional days to recovery, days absent from work, or patient satisfaction. More patients receiving manual therapy (21; 14%) had completely recovered after the first visit compared with the control group (8; 6%; P = 0.01). Patients who received more intense manual therapy (four or more maneuvers) had a more rapid return to functional recovery (7.8 days) compared with those who received less intense manual therapy (11.1 days; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Limited training in manual therapy techniques offers very modest benefit compared with high-quality (enhanced) care for acute low back pain. Outcomes may have been modified by failure of some participant physicians to undertake the required sequence of maneuvers. Intensity of manual therapy may be a factor in improving patient outcomes and needs further study.

Training in back care to improve outcome and patient satisfaction. Teaching old docs new tricks

BACKGROUND

We examined clinical outcomes and patient perceptions of back care given by physicians before and after an intensive course of training in back care and limited manual therapy techniques.

METHODS

From a prospective observational cohort study of low back pain involving 208 physicians (115 primary care) and their patients and a subsequent clinical trial of treatment of low back pain given by 31 physicians specially trained in manual therapy and enhanced back care, outcome data from the patients of 13 physicians participating in both studies were compared. In the observational study, the 13 physicians cared for 120 patients. In the manual therapy trial (191 patients) a control group of 94 patients received enhanced back care and an intervention group of 97 patients received enhanced back care plus manual therapy. Pearson's chi-square comparisons and linear and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to examine effects of variables and recovery time.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the 13 physicians' patients in the cohort group and the manual therapy trial showed some differences in income, workers' compensation, previous employment, and baseline dysfunction. Both control and intervention patients in the manual therapy trial showed more rapid improvement in functional status over time and greater satisfaction with their care than those in the previous cohort study. However, there was no difference between the studies in patient-reported time to return to performing usual daily activities.

CONCLUSIONS

A structured clinical approach to low back care may bring modestly improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Treatment of low back pain associated with ;;back mice'': a case series

Back mice are subcutaneous fibroadenomatous nodules that cause low back symptoms. Previous case reports do not provide systematic descriptions of the clinical presentation or long-term follow-up of this problem. This retrospective case series reports syndrome characteristics and treatment outcomes for injection therapy for "back mice." We completed telephone interviews, chart reviews, and written questionnaires for a convenience sample of 35 participants. Participants reported the following symptoms: pain radiating to the lower leg (37%), leg numbness or paresthesias (14%), and a median of 8 weeks of pain before treatment (range 3 weeks to 10 years). Thirty-one participants (89%) received lasting relief from injection of local anesthetic and corticosteroid. Injection therapy relieved both local and radiating symptoms but often did not eliminate the nodules. Thirty participants (86%) were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the treatment. There were no adverse events reported. Back mice can cause radiating pain that can be confused with other low back or leg syndromes. Injection treatment seems to be effective, long lasting, and well tolerated. Physicians should search for these nodules in patients with unexplained low back pain and try injection therapy before initiating expensive therapy.

Fibro-fatty nodules and low back pain. The back mouse masquerade

BACKGROUND

Few useful interventions exist for patients with persistent low back pain. We suggest that a fibro-fatty nodule ("back mouse") may be an identifiable and treatable cause of this and other types of pain.

METHODS

We describe 2 patients with painful nodules in the lower back and lateral iliac crest areas. In both cases, the signs and symptoms were unusual and presented at locations distant from the nodule. One patient complained of severe acute lower abdominal pain, and the other had been treated for chronic recurrent trochanteric bursitis for several years.

RESULTS

In both patients, symptoms appeared to be relieved by multiple injection of the nodule.

DISCUSSION

There is agreement that back mice exist. Referred pain from the nodules might explain the distant symptoms and signs in these cases. Multiple puncture may be an effective treatment because it lessens the tension of a fibro-fatty nodule.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomized trials on this subject are needed. In the meantime, physicians should keep back mice in mind when presented with atypical and unaccountable symptoms in the lower abdomen, inguinal region, or legs.

Program directors' perspectives on federally funded fellowship training in primary care research

PURPOSE

To describe the organization, models of training, and institutional impact of National Research Service Award fellowship programs in primary care research.

METHOD

Survey of 25 directors of currently-funded and former training sites.

RESULTS

Twenty-four program directors (96%) completed the survey. Programs allocated 39% of fellows' time to course work leading to an advanced degree or other didactic instruction, and 40% of time to the conduct of research. Collaborations with other training programs within the institution occurred at 83% of sites. Programs commonly (54%) or exclusively (42%) relied on a research model of "early research independence" in which the fellow defined an area of research interest, rather than an "apprenticeship" model in which the fellow worked in a senior investigator's research area. These programs enriched the local academic environment, but required extensive financial subsidies. The high costs of training often had adverse impacts on recruitment and other components of the training process.

CONCLUSION

Research training programs in primary care often substitute acquisition of advanced degrees for early immersion in research. The "early independence" model of research differs from fellowships in the medical specialties, and requires further study to assess its effectiveness. The need to subsidize training costs poses substantial problems for the institutions that host these fellowship programs.

Ondansetron is more effective than metoclopramide for the treatment of opioid-induced emesis in post-surgical adult patients. Ondansetron OIE Post-Surgical Study Group

Nausea and vomiting are common side effects of opioids administered for pain control. This double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study evaluated the anti-emetic efficacy and tolerability of single intravenous (i.v.) doses of ondansetron 8 mg, ondansetron 16 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg in the treatment of opioid-induced emesis. Adult patients undergoing low emetogenic surgical procedures, using a standardized anaesthesia regimen were assessed for 24 h following administration of study anti-emetic to treat established post-surgical opioid-induced emesis. A total of 4511 patients were enrolled of whom 1366 experienced opioid-induced emesis and received randomized study medication. Ondansetron 8 mg and 16 mg were significantly better than metoclopramide 10 mg (P < 0.05) for both complete control of emesis, complete control of nausea and other efficacy measures. There were no significant differences between the two ondansetron groups. All three treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, this large, multicentre study demonstrates that ondansetron is more effective than metoclopramide in the treatment of opioid-induced emesis following administration of post-surgical opioids to control pain.

Characteristics and quality of Papanicolaou smears obtained by primary care clinicians using a single commercial laboratory

BACKGROUND

Few data are available on factors associated with the quality of Papanicolaou smears performed in primary care.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the patterns and proficiency of cervical cancer screening among different primary care specialties.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical and cytologic data from 21,833 Papanicolaou smears, submitted to a single large commercial laboratory by 176 clinicians during a 7-month period, were correlated with individual clinician and specialty characteristics according to indexes of specimen quality.

RESULTS

Obstetrician-gynecologists, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants provided screening to a younger population of women compared with family physicians, internists, and general practitioners. Factors positively associated with a greater probability of a "satisfactory" smear or the presence of endocervical cells (as a marker of adequate sampling) were increasing patient age, use of the cytobrush, and the specialty of the obstetrician-gynecologist. Satisfactory smears were not associated with any increased identification of cytologic abnormalities compared with "limited" smears. In contrast, smears with endocervical cells showed a higher proportion of abnormalities compared with specimens without such cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in the performance of obtaining Papanicolaou smears exist between primary care specialties, but need further clarification. The use of the cytobrush and the presence of endocervical cells are criteria that reflect clinician proficiency more realistically than the laboratory criterion of satisfactory smear.

The effect of the quality of Papanicolaou smears on the detection of cytologic abnormalities

BACKGROUND

Controversy continues regarding the relation between the quality of Papanicolaou (Pap) smears, especially the presence of endocervical cells (ECC), with the finding of cytologic abnormalities.

METHODS

As part of a study regarding performance feedback on the quality of Pap smears, data from 56,475 Pap smears obtained by 176 participating clinicians over a 20-month period were analyzed to assess the relation between the presence of ECC, the categorization of global specimen adequacy as "satisfactory" or "satisfactory with limitations," and the prevalence of atypia and squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs).

RESULTS

Atypia was less likely to be found in "satisfactory" Pap smears than in "satisfactory with limitations" quality Pap smears (odds ratio [OR], 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.6; P < 0.001), even though the latter could contain ECC. No association was found between satisfactory Pap smears and cytologic abnormalities. Compared with specimens with no ECC, an ECC count of > or = 50 on a slide was associated positively with the detection of atypia (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.8-2.4; P < 0.001) or SILs (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.2; P < 0.001). A similar relation existed between ECC counts of 25-50 (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2; P = 0.01) and the detection of SILs. No relation was found between specimens with < 25 ECC and the presence of atypia or abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

The global adequacy criterion of "satisfactory" assigned to a Pap smear does not indicate that there is a greater likelihood of detecting cytologic abnormalities compared with lower quality Pap smears. To the authors' knowledge, previous studies regarding the link between ECC in the Pap smear and cytologic abnormalities have not addressed the relevance of how many ECC are needed to maximize the identification of abnormalities. The data from the current study support the value of obtaining at least 25 ECC as a quality indicator of sampling.

Breast stimulation to augment labor: history, mystery, and culture

This paper describes the development of a researchable project, arising from the clinical observation of a physiologic phenomenon during labor. Augmentation of labor by breast stimulation has been used in a variety of cultures for centuries. The process of developing a clinical study of augmentation in the modern obstetric environment is discussed, with reference to cultural attitudes of patients and health care workers.

A comparison of breast stimulation and intravenous oxytocin for the augmentation of labor

BACKGROUND

Breast stimulation to augment labor has been used for centuries in tribal societies and by midwives. In recent years it has been shown to be effective in ripening the cervix, inducing labor, and as an alternative to oxytocin for the contraction stress test. This study compared the effectiveness of breast stimulation with oxytocin infusion in augmenting labor.

METHODS

Women admitted to the labor ward were eligible for the study if they had inadequate labor with premature rupture of the membranes and met inclusion criteria. They were assigned to oxytocin augmentation or breast stimulation (manual or pump), and were switched to oxytocin in the event of method failure. Outcomes included time to delivery, intervention to delivery, proportion of spontaneous deliveries, and Apgar scores. One hundred participants were needed in each arm of the study to demonstrate a 2- to 3-hour difference in delivery time, with a power of 80 percent.

RESULTS

Analysis was performed on 79 women, of whom 49 were in the breast stimulation group and 30 in the oxytocin group. Sixty-five percent of the participants failed breast stimulation and were switched to oxytocin infusion. Although augmentation start to delivery was shorter for the oxytocin group (p < 0.001), no differences in total labor time occurred between the groups. Nulliparas receiving breast stimulation had more spontaneous (relative risk 1.7, p = 0.04), and fewer instrumental deliveries than those receiving oxytocin (relative risk 0.2, p = 0.02). No significant differences in adverse fetal outcomes occurred between the study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The small number of participants and a variety of problems with the conduct of the study prevented the formulation of reliable conclusions from the results. However, the study provided important insights into the feasibility and problems of developing a high-quality randomized trial of augmentation by breast stimulation.

Comparison of an orally disintegrating ondansetron tablet with the conventional ondansetron tablet for cyclophosphamide-induced emesis in cancer patients: a multicenter, double-masked study. Ondansetron Orally Disintegrating Tablet Emesis Study Group

A total of 427 cancer patients receiving cyclophosphamide chemotherapy participated in this multicenter, double-masked, double-dummy, parallel-group, randomized study comparing the antiemetic efficacy and safety of an 8-mg conventional ondansetron tablet (OT, n = 212) taken twice daily with an 8-mg orally disintegrating ondansetron tablet (ODT, n = 215) taken twice daily for 3 days. In the primary efficacy analysis, complete or major control of emesis (0 to 2 emetic episodes) between days 1 and 3 was seen in 80% of OT and 78% of ODT patients. The 90% confidence interval for the differences between treatments was -8.6% to 4.4% (defined interval of equivalence, +/-15%), showing that the formulations were equivalent. In the secondary efficacy analysis, no significant differences were observed in the rates of complete control of emesis (no episodes of emesis) over 3 days (63% and 64% of the respective groups) and on day 1 (84% and 81%, respectively) and in the complete control of nausea over 3 days (37% and 43%, respectively) and on day 1 (59% and 61% of patients, respectively). The taste of ODT was acceptable to the majority of patients (89%) who received it. OT and ODT were both well tolerated. Thus 8 mg ODT twice daily represents a palatable, well-tolerated, and effective antiemetic treatment for the control of cyclophosphamide-induced emesis and nausea and provides equivalent treatment to OT 8 mg twice daily.

Practitioner self-confidence and patient outcomes in acute low back pain

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes for patients with acute low back pain who received care from practitioners with different self-confidence scores on a 4-item scale.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of practitioners. Prospective cohort study of patient outcomes.

SETTING

Private practices and a group model health maintenance organization.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred eighty-nine practitioners, including private practice traditionally trained medical physicians, chiropractors, and physicians in a group model health maintenance organization, who were randomly chosen from practices across the state of North Carolina. These practitioners enrolled 1633 patients with acute low back pain into a prospective cohort study.

METHODS

The practitioner survey contained 10 questionnaire items that measured aspects of practitioner confidence and attitudes in assessing and treating patients with low back pain. Patients were interviewed by telephone after the initial office visit and at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks, or until complete recovery, whichever came first.

RESULTS

Of 189 study practitioners, 95% responded to the survey. A 4-item scale, shown by factor analysis to describe practitioners' self-confidence, demonstrated good internal consistency among physicians and chiropractors. Chiropractors had significantly stronger self-confidence scores than physicians. Among patients of primary care physicians and chiropractors, those who received care from practitioners with stronger self-confidence scores did not differ in the time to functional improvement, overall patient satisfaction, or their perception of the completeness of care.

CONCLUSION

The level of practitioner self-confidence, as measured by a 4-item scale, did not predict patient outcomes in the treatment of acute low back pain.

Does training location influence the clinical skills of medical students?

PURPOSE

To examine the benefits of the shift of medical education into ambulatory primary care settings by investigating whether medical students exposed to a common primary care problem (low back pain) in ambulatory care settings develop better clinical skills.

METHOD

In 1995, the authors categorized 420 students from all four North-Carolina medical schools into groups that had previously encountered patients with low back pain in ambulatory primary care settings, tertiary care settings, both, or neither. The clinical skills of the groups were determined using data collected during standardized-patient examination in which students took the history of, physically examined, and chose a diagnostic strategy for patients with acute, uncomplicated low back pain.

RESULTS

In general, there was no difference between the performances of the student groups associated with the settings of their previous encounters with low back pain. On average, the students failed to ask 35% of the history items and failed to perform 35% of the physical examination items. Many students chose inappropriate diagnostic strategies.

CONCLUSION

The lack of difference between the groups' clinical performances indicates a need to more rigorously define and evaluate outcomes of education in ambulatory care settings. The generally poor clinical performance of all groups suggests that the current curriculum inadequately teaches clinical skills needed to assess and manage common problems. Clearer expectations of competencies and assurances that preceptors in ambulatory care settings will help students meet those learning objectives might lead to better outcomes.

Heritable variation in stomatal responses to elevated CO2 in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae)

Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide may affect plant populations in the short term through effects on photosynthesis and carbon allocation, and over the long term as an agent of natural selection. To test for heritable effects of elevated CO2 on stomatal responses and plant fecundity in Raphanus raphanistrum, we grew plants from 12 paternal families in outdoor open-top chambers at ambient (35 Pa) or elevated (67 Pa) CO2. Contrary to results from a previous study of this species, total flower and fruit production were marginally lower under elevated CO2. Across families, stomatal index and guard cell length showed little response to CO2 enrichment, but these characters varied significantly among paternal families in both the direction and magnitude of their response to changing CO2. Although these family-by-CO2 interactions suggest that natural selection might affect stomatal characters when ambient CO2 levels increase, we found no significant correlation between either character and flower or fruit production. Therefore, our data suggest that while heritable variation for stomatal index and guard cell length exists in this population, selection due to increasing CO2 is not likely to act on these traits because they had no detectable effect on lifetime fecundity.