[Biomechanical screening for injury prevention : The importance of 3D-motion analysis in high performance sports]

Standardized clinical diagnostic procedures cannot assess the functionality of the anatomical structures in sport-specific movement. Biomechanical screening is able to detect deficits but is not sufficiently and objectively precise with the current clinical examination tools including conventional imaging techniques. The fields of use of functional testing methods are versatile and range from injury prevention analysis, screening during rehabilitation phases up to the return-to-play decision. Using simple musculoskeletal function analysis it is difficult to assess the risk of injuries. The main advantage of instrumented 3D-motion analysis is its potential to generate objective, reliable and reproducible data with exact joint angles, muscle activity, as well as loading inside the joints during movement. These marker-based motion analysis procedures are more time-consuming and more cost intensive and necessitate in particular biomechanical and medical knowledge to assess the analytical data in terms of clinical relevance. In the absence of scientific studies on biomechanical analyses in professional sports, this study shows preliminary approaches to this topic.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Fulvestrant Plus Everolimus or Placebo in Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Resistant to Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy: Results of PrE0102

Purpose The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus targets aberrant signaling through the PI3K/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, a mechanism of resistance to anti-estrogen therapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. We hypothesized that everolimus plus the selective ER downregulator fulvestrant would be more efficacious than fulvestrant alone in ER-positive metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Patients and Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study included 131 postmenopausal women with ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, AI-resistant metastatic breast cancer randomly assigned to fulvestrant (500 mg days 1 and 15 of cycle 1, then day 1 of cycles 2 and beyond) plus everolimus or placebo. The study was designed to have 90% power to detect a 70% improvement in median progression-free survival from 5.4 months to 9.2 months. Secondary end points included objective response and clinical benefit rate (response or stable disease for at least 24 weeks). Prophylactic corticosteroid mouth rinses were not used. Results The addition of everolimus to fulvestrant improved the median progression-free survival from 5.1 to 10.3 months (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.92]; stratified log-rank P = .02), indicating that the primary trial end point was met. Objective response rates were similar (18.2% v 12.3%; P = .47), but the clinical benefit rate was significantly higher in the everolimus arm (63.6% v 41.5%; P = .01). Adverse events of all grades occurred more often in the everolimus arm, including oral mucositis (53% v 12%), fatigue (42% v 22%), rash (38% v 5%), anemia (31% v. 6%), diarrhea (23% v 8%), hyperglycemia (19% v 5%), hypertriglyceridemia (17% v 3%), and pneumonitis (17% v 0%), although grade 3 to 4 events were uncommon. Conclusion Everolimus enhances the efficacy of fulvestrant in AI-resistant, ER-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Abstract P3-12-13: Breast atypical hyperplasia and guideline compliance

Background: Atypical hyperplasia of the breast is a high-risk benign lesion that is found in approximately 10% of benign breast biopsies[1]and confers a risk for future breast cancer[2]. The American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline states that pharmacologic risk reduction with the use of a selective estrogen receptor modulator or an aromatase inhibitor should be discussed with women with a 5-year projected absolute risk of breast cancer of 1.7% or higher[3]. The NCCN guideline for risk reduction recommends consideration of risk-reduction interventions, including the use of pharmacologic agents in women with a 5-year risk of 1.7% or higher and a life expectancy of 10 years or longer [4] .The majority of women with atypical hyperplasia meet this risk criterion with their cumulative risk of approximately 1% per year.

Method: We retrospectively reviewed excisional biopsy pathology reports between January 2016 and June 2016 with the diagnosis of atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia to identify patients with pure atypical hyperplasia. Medical records of these patients were then reviewed to identify the percentage of patients referred to a medical oncologist for chemoprevention discussion and the percentage of patients who received chemoprevention following excisional biopsy.

Results: Two hundred seventy six patients with the diagnosis of atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia were identified. Two hundred and sixteen patients were excluded from the analysis due to the presence of other histologies such as carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma. Medical records of the remaining sixty patients with pure atypical hyperplasia were reviewed. Eighteen patients' charts were unavailable for review. All of the remaining forty two patients had a 5-year breast cancer risk of 1.7% or higher. Five of these patients (8.3%) were referred to a medical oncologist for chemoprevention discussion. Two of these five patients (2.3%) received chemoprevention with tamoxifen. For patients who were not referred to medical oncologist, there was one documented discussion of chemoprevention with patient by her surgical oncologist. One patient underwent prophylactic bilateral mastectomies, and therefore, chemoprevention was not recommended.

Conclusion: Multidisciplinary strategies need to be implemented to bridge the gap between guidelines and clinical practices which may lead to improved patient outcomes.

References:

1. 1. Simpson JF. Update on atypical epithelial hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ. Pathology 2009;41:36-39.

2. 2. Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, et al. Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:229-237.

3. Visvanathan K, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Use of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2942-2962. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:4383.

Citation Format: Lee LM, Klein P, Velazy R. Breast atypical hyperplasia and guideline compliance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-13.

[Asylum seekers and the healthcare situation]

Medical healthcare for refugees is strictly regulated by law in Germany but the great regional variation in the implementation is currently a huge challenge for healthcare providers. Providers are often not familiar with the specific local regulations and especially in emergencies it is often not possible to clarify open questions before treating patients. The high influx of refugees in the summer and fall of 2015 led to a situation that could only be managed with the voluntary and pragmatic help of all healthcare personnel involved. This article explains the most relevant regulations covering medical healthcare for refugees and asylum seekers. In addition, the procedure for the approval of asylum status in itself can have a direct or indirect impact on the health status of these individuals; therefore, some comments are made regarding this aspect.

The last frontier: transcatheter devices for percutaneous or minimally invasive treatment of chronic heart failure

Heart failure has a high prevalence in the general population. Morbidity and mortality of heart failure patients remain high, despite improvements in drug therapy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronisation therapy. New transcatheter implantable devices have been developed to improve the treatment of heart failure. There has been a rapid development of minimally invasive or transcatheter devices used in the treatment of heart failure associated with aortic and mitral valve disease and these devices are being incorporated into routine clinical practice at a fast rate. Several other new transcatheter structural heart interventions for chronic heart failure aimed at a variety of pathophysiologic approaches are currently being developed. In this review, we focus on devices used in the treatment of chronic heart failure by means of left ventricular remodelling, left atrial pressure reduction, tricuspid regurgitation reduction and neuromodulation. The clinical evaluations of these devices are early-stage evaluations of initial feasibility and safety studies and additional clinical evidence needs to be gathered in appropriately designed clinical trials.

Perioperative management of antiplatelet treatment in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in Dutch cardiothoracic centres

BACKGROUND

International guidelines do not provide uniform recommendations regarding the use of antiplatelet treatment in the perioperative period in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to all 16 cardiothoracic centres in the Netherlands to determine which antiplatelet treatment is used in the perioperative setting. Furthermore, a single-centre prospective observational cohort study was performed which included all patients undergoing isolated CABG in July 2014.

RESULTS

Eleven centres responded to the survey. Acetylsalicylic acid monotherapy was discontinued before surgery in 6 centres. In patients with an acute coronary syndrome receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), most centres discontinued the P2Y₁₂ inhibitor preoperatively. DAPT was restarted after surgery in 4 centres. However, 6 centres continued DAPT in patients who had undergone coronary stenting within one month of surgery. In patients with coronary stents, variation in the management of antiplatelet therapy increased in proportion to the interval between stenting and surgery. A total of 70 patients were included in the registry. Acetylsalicylic acid monotherapy was discontinued in 51% of patients and restarted in all patients. P2Y₁₂ inhibitor treatment was discontinued before surgery in 70% of patients and re-initiated after CABG in 29%.

CONCLUSIONS

Major differences were observed in the preoperative and postoperative management of antiplatelet treatment between different Dutch cardiothoracic centres and within a single centre. Part of this variation is probably due to lack of evidence and differences between the current guidelines; however, many of the strategies were not in accordance with any of these guidelines.

PABPN1 gene therapy for oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy

Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) is an autosomal dominant, late-onset muscle disorder characterized by ptosis, swallowing difficulties, proximal limb weakness and nuclear aggregates in skeletal muscles. OPMD is caused by a trinucleotide repeat expansion in the PABPN1 gene that results in an N-terminal expanded polyalanine tract in polyA-binding protein nuclear 1 (PABPN1). Here we show that the treatment of a mouse model of OPMD with an adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy combining complete knockdown of endogenous PABPN1 and its replacement by a wild-type PABPN1 substantially reduces the amount of insoluble aggregates, decreases muscle fibrosis, reverts muscle strength to the level of healthy muscles and normalizes the muscle transcriptome. The efficacy of the combined treatment is further confirmed in cells derived from OPMD patients. These results pave the way towards a gene replacement approach for OPMD treatment.

Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy is caused by trinucleotide repeat expansions in the PABPN1 gene. Here the authors use AAV-based gene therapy to knockdown the mutant gene and replace it with a wild-type allele, and show effectiveness in mice and in patient cells.

Abstract P5-11-17: Body image in women with breast cancer using a scalp cooling system to reduce chemotherapy induced alopecia

Background: Most women consider hair to be an important part of body image. Alopecia is an emotionally traumatic side effect for breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. The DigniCap™ Scalp Cooling System is the first scalp cooling system cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy induced alopecia.

Methods: Quality of Life (QOL) data were collected as part of a prospective clinical trial evaluating the clinical performance of scalp cooling in women with early stage BC receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

The study's primary endpoint was hair loss as evaluated by patient self-assessment. Treatment success was defined as ≤ 50% hair loss. QOL was evaluated by the EORTC-QLQ-BR23 (BR23) administered at baseline, last chemotherapy cycle, and one month later. For BR23, 4 response categories were collapsed to 2 categories (Not at all/A little bit and Quite a bit/Very much) for analysis. QOL was compared between those with success vs. failure of scalp cooling.

Results: 101 patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint: Success was seen in 67 (66.3%) pts. QOL at study entry was comparable between pts with scalp cooling success or failure for each item in the BR23 questionnaire. Results reported as percentages of patients in each group who answered either quite a bit or very much to body image-related questions on the BR23 questionnaire are displayed in Table 1.

BR23 results (% quite a bit/very much) one month after chemotherapyBR23 ItemsTreatment Success % (95% CI)Treatment Failure % (95% CI)Felt physically less attractive18.5% (9.0%, 27.9%)52.2% (31.8%, 72.6%)Felt less feminine15.4% (6.6%, 24.2%)29.1% (19.2%, 59.1%)Found it difficult to see themselves naked13.8% (5.5%, 22.2%)21.7% (4.9%, 38.6%)Felt dissatisfied with their body12.3% (4.3%, 20.3%)26.1% (8.1%, 44.0%)

Conclusions: Women with breast cancer using scalp cooling during chemotherapy who had hair preservation experienced improved quality of life, according to self-assessment of body image, compared to women who had significant hair loss.

Citation Format: Cigler T, Melin SA, Klein P, Hurvitz SA, Melisko M, Moore A, Park GD, Bageman E, Ver Hoeve ES, Rugo HS. Body image in women with breast cancer using a scalp cooling system to reduce chemotherapy induced alopecia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-17.

Association Between Use of a Scalp Cooling Device and Alopecia After Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Chemotherapy-induced alopecia is a common and distressing adverse effect. In previous studies of scalp cooling to prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia, conclusions have been limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether use of a scalp cooling system is associated with a lower amount of hair loss among women receiving specific chemotherapy regimens for early-stage breast cancer and to assess related changes in quality of life.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A prospective cohort study conducted at 5 US medical centers of women with stage I or II breast cancer receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens excluding sequential or combination anthracycline and taxane (106 patients in the scalp cooling group and 16 in the control group; 14 matched by both age and chemotherapy regimen). The study was conducted between August 2013 and October 2014 with ongoing annual follow-up for 5 years.

EXPOSURES

Use of a scalp cooling system. Scalp cooling was initiated 30 minutes prior to each chemotherapy cycle, with scalp temperature maintained at 3°C (37°F) throughout chemotherapy and for 90 minutes to 120 minutes afterward.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Self-estimated hair loss using the Dean scale was assessed 4 weeks after the last dose of chemotherapy by unblinded patient review of 5 photographs. A Dean scale score of 0 to 2 (≤50% hair loss) was defined as treatment success. A positive association between scalp cooling and reduced risk of hair loss would be demonstrated if 50% or more of patients in the scalp cooling group achieved treatment success, with the lower bound of the 95% CI greater than 40% of the success proportion. Quality of life was assessed at baseline, at the start of the last chemotherapy cycle, and 1 month later. Median follow-up was 29.5 months.

RESULTS

Among the 122 patients in the study, the mean age was 53 years (range, 28-77 years); 77.0% were white, 9.0% were black, and 10.7% were Asian; and the mean duration of chemotherapy was 2.3 months (median, 2.1 months). No participants in the scalp cooling group received anthracyclines. Hair loss of 50% or less (Dean score of 0-2) was seen in 67 of 101 patients (66.3%; 95% CI, 56.2%-75.4%) evaluable for alopecia in the scalp cooling group vs 0 of 16 patients (0%) in the control group (P < .001). Three of 5 quality-of-life measures were significantly better 1 month after the end of chemotherapy in the scalp cooling group. Of patients who underwent scalp cooling, 27.3% (95% CI, 18.0%-36.6%) reported feeling less physically attractive compared with 56.3% (95% CI, 31.9%-80.6%) of patients in the control group (P = .02). Of the 106 patients in the scalp cooling group, 4 (3.8%) experienced the adverse event of mild headache and 3 (2.8%) discontinued scalp cooling due to feeling cold.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among women undergoing non-anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, the use of scalp cooling vs no scalp cooling was associated with less hair loss at 4 weeks after the last dose of chemotherapy. Further research is needed to assess outcomes after patients receive anthracycline regimens, longer-term measures of alopecia, and adverse effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01831024.

Randomized phase II trial of fulvestrant alone or in combination with bortezomib in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitors: a New York Cancer Consortium trial

The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib enhances the effect of the selective estrogen receptor (ER) downregulator (SERD) fulvestrant by causing accumulation of cytoplasmic ER aggregates in preclinical models. The purpose of this trial was to determine whether bortezomib enhanced the effectiveness of fulvestrant. One hundred eighteen postmenopausal women with ER-positive metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) were randomized to fulvestrant alone (Arm A-500 mg intramuscular (i.m.) day -14, 1, 15 in cycle 1, and day 1 of additional cycles) or in combination with bortezomib (Arm B-1.6 mg/m² intravenous (i.v.) on days 1, 8, 15 of each cycle). The study was powered to show an improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) from 5.4 to 9.0 months and compare PFS rates at 6 and 12 months (α=0.10, β=0.10). Patients with progression on fulvestrant could cross over to the combination (arm C). Although there was no difference in median PFS (2.7 months in both arms), the hazard ratio for PFS in Arm B versus Arm A (referent) was 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.49, 1.09, P=0.06, 1-sided log-rank test, significant at the prespecified 1-sided 0.10 α level). At 12 months, the PFS proportion in Arm A and Arm B was 13.6% and 28.1% (P=0.03, 1-sided χ²-test; 95% CI for difference (14.5%)=-0.06, 29.1%). Of 27 patients on arm A who crossed over to the combination (arm C), 5 (18%) were progression-free for at least 24 weeks. Bortezomib likely enhances the effectiveness of fulvestrant in AI-resistant, ER-positive metastatic breast cancer by reducing acquired resistance, supporting additional evaluation of proteasome inhibitors in combination with SERDs.

Abstract P3-07-07: The updated ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 testing create more uncertainty for clinicians

Background: Accurate assessment of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) status has been an integral part of clinical decision making in treatments of breast cancer. In 2007, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) published a series of guidelines on how to determine the status of HER2. The guidelines were updated in 2013 with the goal of reducing the numbers of false negative cases. The new guidelines are based on a combination of HER2:CEP17 ratio and average HER2 copy number. We sought to assess the overall effect of the new guidelines.

Methods: We retrospectively identified all cases of invasive breast cancer with HER2 testing done in 2014 from the pathology database of Mount Sinai Beth Israel, Mount Sinai St. Luke's and Roosevelt Hospitals. Our pathology department guideline is to perform initial testing for HER2 with immunohistochemistry (IHC) by the HercepTest (Dako) method. Those with IHC of 2+ would be followed by reflex HER2 dual probe FISH. The HER2:CEP 17 ratio and average HER2 copy number were then reviewed for each IHC 2+ case using the 2013 guidelines. These cases were then rescored using the 2007 guidelines. All equivocal cases as determined by the new 2013 guidelines (HER2:CEP17 ratio &lt;2.0 with an average HER2 copy number ≥4.0 and &lt;6.0 signals/cell) were further evaluated to determine whether repeat HER2 testing was performed as suggested by the new guidelines and whether HER2 directed therapy was recommended for patient.

Results: Among 853 cases identified in the database, 337 were IHC 2+. Using 2007 guidelines, 27/337 cases (8.0%) were amplified (HER2:CEP 17 ratio &gt;2.2), 6 (1.8%) were equivocal (HER2:CEP 17 ratio 1.8-2.2), and 305 cases (90.2%) were non-amplified (HER2:CEP 17 ratio &lt;1.8). Using the 2013 guidelines, 29/337 cases (8.6%) were amplified (HER2:CEP 17 ratio ≥2 or HER2 copy number ≥6), 23 (6.8%) were equivocal (HER2:CEP17 ratio &lt;2.0 with an average HER2 copy number ≥4.0 and &lt;6.0), and 284 (84.3%) were non-amplified (HER2:CEP 17 ratio &lt;2 with an average HER2 copy number &lt;4.0). The new guidelines resulted in change in HER2 status in 24 cases (7.1%): 2 cases changed from equivocal to amplified, 1 case changed from equivocal to non-amplified, but 20 cases changed from non-amplified to equivocal. Of the 23 equivocal cases determined using the 2013 guidelines, only 13 cases had repeat HER2 analysis. On repeat HER2 testing, one case was found to be HER2 amplified, 4 cases were non-amplified, and 8 cases remained equivocal. Only one equivocal case received HER2 directed treatment.

Conclusion: The 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 assessment identified a slightly increased number of patients eligible for HER2 directed therapy, but also resulted in a significant increase in the number of equivocal cases. The new guidelines appear to have generated more uncertainty for the clinician due to the rise in equivocal cases. Further studies are needed to determine whether patients with equivocal HER2 status would benefit from HER2 directed therapy.

Citation Format: Chen J, Klein P, Shao T. The updated ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 testing create more uncertainty for clinicians. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-07.

Abstract S6-03: Randomized phase II trial of fulvestrant alone or in combination with bortezomib in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitors: A New York cancer consortium trial

Purpose: Fulvestrant (F) is a selective estrogen receptor downregulator (SERD) with activity in aromatase-inhibitor (AI) resistant estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In preclinical studies, the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (B) enhances the antineoplastic effects of F, in part by promoting accumulation of large ER-aggregates that lead to cell death (Ishii et al. Clin Cancer Res 2011 17:2292). The objective of this study was to determine if the combination of F+B was more efficacious than F alone in MBC after AI progression.

Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal women with ER-positive MBC who had progressive disease after prior AI therapy were eligible. They were randomized to F alone (500 mg IM days -15, 1, 15 in cycle 1, and day 1 of each subsequent cycle) or in combination with B (1.6 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, 15). The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), measured from cycle 1, day 1 of starting F. A sample size of 118 was pre-specified in order to provide sufficient power to detect an improvement in median PFS from 5.4 to 9.0 months, and compare PFS rates after 6 and 12 months (1-sided alpha=0.10, beta=0.10). Patients with progression on F could cross over to the F+B combination.

Results: Of 118 patients enrolled, 59 received F alone (arm A), 57 received F+B (arm B), and 2 assigned to arm B never initiated protocol therapy. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between arms with regard to median age (57 vs. 59 years), ECOG performance status (0 and 1, 64% and 36%, respectively), prior chemotherapy for metastasis (25%), or liver metastases (37%), although patients in arm A had longer median interval between diagnosis and metastasis (49 vs. 28 months) and were more likely to present with metastasis (32% vs. 26%). Patients in arm B had more adverse events (all grades), including nausea (63% vs. 29%), diarrhea (47% vs. 8%), sensory neuropathy (46% vs. 29%), and limb edema (37% vs. 19%), although grade 3-4 events were uncommon, and only 11% discontinued B due to toxicity. At 12 months, the PFS proportion in Arm A and Arm B was 13.6% vs. 28.1%, respectively (P=0.03, 1-sided chi-square test) (95% CI for difference [14.5%] = -0.06%, 29.1%). Although median PFS was similar in the two arms (2.69 vs. 2.73 months, respectively), the hazard ratio for Arm B vs. Arm A (referent) was 0.73 (95% CI = 0.49, 1.09, P=0.06, 1-sided log rank test). Both results were significant at the pre-specified 1-sided 0.10 alpha level. Of 27 patients on arm A who crossed over to F+B at progression, 4 (15%) were progression-free for at least 24 weeks and had periods of disease control that were longer than when treated with F alone.

Conclusion: Adding bortezomib to fulvestrant in AI-resistant ER-positive MBC enhances its effectiveness by delaying acquired fulvestrant resistance. These results support additional evaluation of proteasome inhibitors in combination with SERDs.

Acknowledgement: Supported by contract N01-CM-62204 to the New York Cancer Consortium (P.I. J. Sparano) and grant P30 CA013330 (P.I. D. Goldman) from the National Institutes of Health, and by a grant from Millennium, Inc.

Citation Format: Kerin B Adelson, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Joseph A Sparano, Paul J Christos, John J Wright, George Raptis, Miguel C Villalona, Cynthia X Ma, Dawn Hershman, Joseph Baar, Paula Klein, Tessa Cigler, G Thomas Budd, Yelena Novik, Antoinette R Tan, Susan Tannenbaum, Anupama Goel, Ellis Levine, Charles L Shapiro, Eleni Andreopoulou, Michael Naughton, Kevin Kalinsky, Samuel Waxman, Doris Germain. Randomized phase II trial of fulvestrant alone or in combination with bortezomib in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitors: A New York cancer consortium trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr S6-03.

Abstract P3-12-10: Calcium and magnesium infusion for the prevention of taxane induced neuropathy in early stage breast cancer

Background: Taxane is an active drug in the treatment of breast cancer, but peripheral neuropathy is a major dose limiting side effect. There are currently no effective drugs or treatment modalities for the prevention or treatment of taxane-related neuropathy. We examined whether calcium and magnesium (Ca/Mg) infusions can reduce the incidence of neuropathy in patients with early stage breast cancer who are treated with paclitaxel.

Methods: This was a pilot study evaluating the feasibility of Ca/Mg infusion to prevent taxane induced neuropathy in women with early stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant or neo-adjuvant paclitaxel treatment, either given every 2 weeks for 4 cycles or every week for 12 weeks. All patients received calcium gluconate and magnesium sulfate infusion, 1 g of each agent immediately before and after each dose of paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was paclitaxel-related neuropathy grade 2 or greater as measured by NCI Common Terminology Criteria Version 3 compared with historical controls. Secondary endpoints included other measures of neuropathy and quality of life such as the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane (FACT-Tax) score, taxane-related neuropathic pain as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF). The endpoints were assessed in patients midway through treatment, at the end of treatment and 4 weeks after finishing taxane therapy.

Results: We enrolled 50 patients, 47 patients were evaluable, and 3 patients were taken out of the study due to non-neuropathy related side effects or progression of disease. Median age: 50.8 (range 27-71), White/Hispanic/Black/Asian/Other: 17/16/12/3/2. Two patients received paclitaxel every 2 weeks, while the remainder received weekly therapy. Eight of 47 patients (17%) had grade 2 neuropathy four weeks after treatment completed, while no patients had grade 3 or 4 neuropathy. This rate of neuropathy is significantly lower compared to that seen in historical control where approximately 30% of patients develop grade 2 or greater neuropathy. There were no significant changes in the quality of life measurements. There were no observed toxicities related to the Ca/Mg infusion.

Discussion: Our study showed a decreased incidence of paclitaxel-related neuropathy in patients receiving Ca/Mg infusions when compared to historical controls. The infusions are well tolerated without any side effects. Randomized studies are warranted to further evaluate Ca/Mg infusion for the prevention of paclitaxel-related neuropathy.

Citation Format: Theresa Shao, Joshua Kra, Paula Klein, Anupama Goel, Stephen Malamud, Tiffany Xing, Johnny Chan, Michael L Grossbard. Calcium and magnesium infusion for the prevention of taxane induced neuropathy in early stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-10.

NMR crystallography of monovalent cations in inorganic matrixes: Li+ siting and the local structure of Li+ sites in ferrierites

A new approach to the determination of the Li⁺ siting and the local structure of Li⁺ sites in zeolites is reported.

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma is reduced in patients with chronic hepatitis B on long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy

BACKGROUND

North American data are lacking on the effect of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) in preventing chronic hepatitis B (CHB)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

AIM

To determine the incidence of HCC in NA-treated patients and compare this risk with that predicted without treatment based on the REACH-B model.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, the incidence of HCC was determined in CHB patients initiated on NA from 1999 to 2012. Pre-treatment data utilised in the REACH-B model were used to predict the annual HCC risk. The standardised incidence ratio (SIR) for HCC was calculated by comparing the observed to expected number of cases, and HCC risk factors determined by Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Five hundred and forty nine initiated NA (14% lamivudine, 5% adefovir, 1.5% telbivudine, 39% entecavir, 41% tenofovir). Over a median follow-up of 3.2 years (IQR 1.9-4.6), 11 (3.2%) were diagnosed with HCC. Among 322 with data to calculate the REACH-B model, the median age at treatment initiation was 46 years (IQR 38-55), 65% were male, 32% HBeAg positive and 20% had cirrhosis. The median pre-treatment ALT was 71 U/L (IQR 41-127) and HBV DNA was 6.48 log10 copies/mL (4.95-8.04). The observed annual HCC incidence (0.9%; 95% CI 0.5-1.7) was significantly lower than predicted without treatment by the REACH-B model (SIR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23-0.82); this risk was reduced after 4 years of therapy (SIR 0.49; 95% CI 0.2-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

In this Canadian study of nucleos(t)ide analogues-treated patients with chronic hepatitis B, the incidence of HCC was lower than expected, suggesting that NA reduce the risk of chronic hepatitis B-related HCC.