Transcriptomic Heterogeneity of Metastatic Disease Timing within Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) is commonly partitioned into high- and low-volume subgroups which have demonstrated differential biology, prognosis, and response to therapy. Timing of metastasis has similarly demonstrated differences in clinical outcomes, however less is known about any potential underlying biologic differences between these disease states. Herein we aim to compare transcriptomic differences between synchronous and metachronous mCSPC and identify any differential responses to therapy.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective review of men with mCSPC who completed RNA expression profiling evaluation of their primary tumor. Patients were stratified according to disease timing (synchronous vs metachronous). The primary endpoint was to identify differences in transcriptomic profiles between disease time. Median genomic scores between groups were compared with Mann-Whitney U test. Secondary analyses included determining clinical and transcriptomic variables associated with overall survival (OS) from time of metastasis. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier Method and Multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients were included with a median follow-up of 39.6 months. Patients with synchronous disease experienced worse 5-yr OS (39% vs 79%, p<0.01) and demonstrated lower median Androgen Receptor Activity (AR-A) (11.78 vs 12.64, p<0.01) and Hallmark Androgen Response (HAR) (3.15 vs 3.32; p<0.01). Multivariable cox-regression identified only high-volume disease (HR = 4.97, 95% CI 2.71-9.10; p<0.01) and HAR score (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.88; p = 0.02 significantly associated with OS. Finally, patients with synchronous (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.72; <0.01) but not metachronous (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 0.50-3.92; p = 0.56) disease were found to have better OS with Androgen Receptor (AR) + non-AR combination therapy as compared to monotherapy (p value for interaction = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated a potential biologic difference between metastatic timing of mCSPC. Specifically, for patients with low volume disease, those with metachronous low volume disease have a more hormone dependent transcriptional profile and exhibit a better prognosis than synchronous low volume disease.

A geometry and dose-volume based performance monitoring of artificial intelligence models in radiotherapy treatment planning for prostate cancer

Background and Purpose

Clinical Artificial Intelligence (AI) implementations lack ground-truth when applied on real-world data. This study investigated how combined geometrical and dose-volume metrics can be used as performance monitoring tools to detect clinically relevant candidates for model retraining.

Materials and Methods

Fifty patients were analyzed for both AI-segmentation and planning. For AI-segmentation, geometrical (Standard Surface Dice 3 mm and Local Surface Dice 3 mm) and dose-volume based parameters were calculated for two organs (bladder and anorectum) to compare AI output against the clinically corrected structure. A Local Surface Dice was introduced to detect geometrical changes in the vicinity of the target volumes, while an Absolute Dose Difference (ADD) evaluation increased focus on dose-volume related changes. AI-planning performance was evaluated using clinical goal analysis in combination with volume and target overlap metrics.

Results

The Local Surface Dice reported equal or lower values compared to the Standard Surface Dice (anorectum: (0.93 ± 0.11) vs (0.98 ± 0.04); bladder: (0.97 ± 0.06) vs (0.98 ± 0.04)). The ADD metric showed a difference of (0.9 ± 0.8)Gy for the anorectum D 1 cm 3 . The bladder D 5cm 3 reported a difference of (0.7 ± 1.5)Gy. Mandatory clinical goals were fulfilled in 90 % of the DLP plans.

Conclusions

Combining dose-volume and geometrical metrics allowed detection of clinically relevant changes, applied to both auto-segmentation and auto-planning output and the Local Surface Dice was more sensitive to local changes compared to the Standard Surface Dice. This monitoring is able to evaluate AI behavior in clinical practice and allows candidate selection for active learning.

Multi-Institutional Analysis of Metastasis Directed Therapy with or without Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Oligometastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Several prospective trials in oligometastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) have shown metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) can delay time to progression and initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to observation. However, the optimal integration of ADT with MDT remains unclear. Here we report a multi-national, multi-institutional retrospective cohort of omCSPC treated with MDT to characterize the long-term outcomes of patients treated with MDT alone or in combination with ADT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with a controlled primary site and omCSPC (defined as ≤ 5 lesions on conventional imaging) treated with MDT with or without concurrent ADT and with at least 36 months follow-up were retrospectively screened across 13 institutions. The primary endpoints included biochemical progression free survival (bPFS) and radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and stratified by treatment group (MDT alone vs MDT + ADT). Multivariable Cox regression was performed adjusted for variables found to be prognostic on univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among 414 patients screened, a total of 263 patients treated between 2003 and 2018 met inclusion criteria and included. Of these, 105 received MDT alone and 158 received MDT+ADT, with median follow-up of 49.5 and 54.5 months, respectively. The majority were metachronous (90%) and had bone lesions (60%). Median ADT duration was 21.3 months (IQR 12.0- 31.9). Patients who received ADT vs. no ADT had poorer prognostic features including 23% vs. 1% synchronous (p<0.001), and 55% vs 40% Gleason 8-10 (p = 0.012). ADT use was associated with a better 5-year bPFS 24% vs 11% (p<0.0001) and rPFS 41% vs 29% (p<0.001). On multivariable Cox regression adjusting for post-MDT PSA nadir and salvage therapy, ADT use maintained significance for both bPFS (HR 0.51 (0.36, 0.71), p<0.001) and rPFS (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.96, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcomes with MDT alone suggest a small proportion of patients experience sustained disease control. The addition of ADT appears to improve rPFS, however prospective studies are needed in order to allow for personalization of care in patients with omCSPC.

Whole Slide Imaging-Based Prediction of TP53 Mutations Identifies an Aggressive Disease Phenotype in Prostate Cancer

In prostate cancer, there is an urgent need for objective prognostic biomarkers that identify the metastatic potential of a tumor at an early stage. While recent analyses indicated TP53 mutations as candidate biomarkers, molecular profiling in a clinical setting is complicated by tumor heterogeneity. Deep learning models that predict the spatial presence of TP53 mutations in whole slide images (WSI) offer the potential to mitigate this issue. To assess the potential of WSIs as proxies for spatially resolved profiling and as biomarkers for aggressive disease, we developed TiDo, a deep learning model that achieves state-of-the-art performance in predicting TP53 mutations from WSIs of primary prostate tumors. In an independent multifocal cohort, the model showed successful generalization at both the patient and lesion level. Analysis of model predictions revealed that false positive (FP) predictions could at least partially be explained by TP53 deletions, suggesting that some FP carry an alteration that leads to the same histological phenotype as TP53 mutations. Comparative expression and histologic cell type analyses identified a TP53-like cellular phenotype triggered by expression of pathways affecting stromal composition. Together, these findings indicate that WSI-based models might not be able to perfectly predict the spatial presence of individual TP53 mutations but they have the potential to elucidate the prognosis of a tumor by depicting a downstream phenotype associated with aggressive disease biomarkers.

SIGNIFICANCE

Deep learning models predicting TP53 mutations from whole slide images of prostate cancer capture histologic phenotypes associated with stromal composition, lymph node metastasis, and biochemical recurrence, indicating their potential as in silico prognostic biomarkers. See related commentary by Bordeleau, p. 2809.

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Combination With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: The CHEERS Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 have improved the outcome for many cancer types, the majority of patients fails to respond to ICI monotherapy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of ICIs.

Objective

To assess the addition of radiotherapy to ICIs compared with ICI monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial was conducted in 5 Belgian hospitals and enrolled participants between March 2018 and October 2020. Patients 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung carcinoma were eligible. A total of 99 patients were randomly assigned to either the control arm (n = 52) or the experimental arm (n = 47). Of those, 3 patients (1 in the control arm vs 2 in the experimental arm) withdrew consent and thus were not included in the analysis. Data analyses were performed between April 2022 and March 2023.

Interventions

Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive anti-PD-1/PD-1 ligand 1 ICIs alone as per standard of care (control arm) or combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy 3 × 8 gray to a maximum of 3 lesions prior to the second or third ICI cycle, depending on the frequency of administration (experimental arm). Randomization was stratified according to tumor histologic findings and disease burden (3 and fewer or more than 3 cancer lesions).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as per immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Key secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, local control rate, and toxic effects. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, while safety was evaluated in the as-treated population.

Results

Among 96 patients included in the analysis (mean age, 66 years; 76 [79%] female), 72 (75%) had more than 3 tumor lesions and 65 (68%) had received at least 1 previous line of systemic treatment at time of inclusion. Seven patients allocated to the experimental arm did not complete the study-prescribed radiotherapy course due to early disease progression (n = 5) or intercurrent illness (n = 2). With a median (range) follow-up of 12.5 (0.7-46.2) months, median PFS was 2.8 months in the control arm compared with 4.4 months in the experimental arm (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.58-1.53; P = .82). Between the control and experimental arms, no improvement in median OS was observed (11.0 vs 14.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.48-1.41; P = .47), and objective response rate was not statistically significantly different (22% vs 27%; P = .56), despite a local control rate of 75% in irradiated patients. Acute treatment-related toxic effects of any grade and grade 3 or higher occurred in 79% and 18% of patients in the control arm vs 78% and 18% in the experimental arm, respectively. No grade 5 adverse events occurred.

Conclusions and Relevance

This phase 2 randomized clinical trial demonstrated that while safe, adding subablative stereotactic radiotherapy of a limited number of metastatic lesions to ICI monotherapy failed to show improvement in PFS or OS.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03511391.

AR and PI3K Genomic Profiling of Cell-free DNA Can Identify Poor Responders to Lutetium-177-PSMA Among Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligands (¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA) are new therapeutic agents for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We evaluated the prognostic value of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) profiling in patients with mCRPC starting treatment with ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA I&T. Between January 2020 and October 2022, patients with late-stage mCRPC (n = 57) were enrolled in a single-centre observational cohort study. Genomic alterations in the AR gene, PI3K signalling pathway, TP53, and TMPRSS2-ERG were associated with progression-free survival (PFS) on Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Median PFS of 3.84 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3-5.4) was observed, and 21/56 (37.5%) evaluable patients experienced a prostate-specific antigen response of ≥50% during treatment. Among 46 patients who provided a blood sample for profiling before ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA treatment. ctDNA was detected in 39 (84.8%); higher ctDNA was correlated with shorter PFS. Genomic structural rearrangements in the AR gene (hazard ratio [HR] 9.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4-39.5; p = 0.001) and alterations in the PI3K signalling pathway (HR 3.58, 95% CI 1.41-9.08; p = 0.007) were independently associated with poor ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA prognosis on multivariable Cox regression. Prospective evaluation of these associations in biomarker-driven trials is warranted.

Patient summary

We examined cell-free DNA in blood samples from patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer who started treatment with lutetium-177-PSMA, a new radioligand therapy. We found that patients with genetic alterations in the androgen receptor gene or PI3K pathway genes did not experience a lasting benefit from lutetium-177-PSMA.

Transcriptomic and clinical heterogeneity of metastatic disease timing within metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) is commonly classified into high- and low-volume subgroups which have demonstrated differential biology, prognosis, and response to therapy. Timing of metastasis has similarly demonstrated differences in clinical outcomes; however, less is known about any underlying biologic differences between these disease states. Herein, we aim to compare transcriptomic differences between synchronous and metachronous mCSPC and identify any differential responses to therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective review of men with mCSPC who completed RNA expression profiling evaluation of their primary tumor. Patients were stratified according to disease timing (synchronous versus metachronous). The primary endpoint was to identify differences in transcriptomic profiles between disease timing. The median transcriptomic scores between groups were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Secondary analyses included determining clinical and transcriptomic variables associated with overall survival (OS) from the time of metastasis. Survival analysis was carried out with the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients were included with a median follow-up of 39.6 months. Patients with synchronous disease experienced worse 5-year OS (39% versus 79%; P < 0.01) and demonstrated lower median androgen receptor (AR) activity (11.78 versus 12.64; P < 0.01) and hallmark androgen response (HAR; 3.15 versus 3.32; P < 0.01). Multivariable Cox regression identified only high-volume disease [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.71-9.10; P < 0.01] and HAR score (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.88; P = 0.02) significantly associated with OS. Finally, patients with synchronous (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.72; P < 0.01) but not metachronous (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 0.50-3.92; P = 0.56) disease were found to have better OS with AR and non-AR combination therapy as compared with monotherapy (P value for interaction = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated a potential biologic difference between metastatic timing of mCSPC. Specifically, for patients with low-volume disease, those with metachronous low-volume disease have a more hormone-dependent transcriptional profile and exhibit a better prognosis than synchronous low-volume disease.

Defining the role of real-world data in cancer clinical research: The position of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer

The emergence of the precision medicine paradigm in oncology has led to increasing interest in the integration of real-world data (RWD) into cancer clinical research. As sources of real-world evidence (RWE), such data could potentially help address the uncertainties that surround the adoption of novel anticancer therapies into the clinic following their investigation in clinical trials. At present, RWE-generating studies which investigate antitumour interventions seem to primarily focus on collecting and analysing observational RWD, typically forgoing the use of randomisation despite its methodological benefits. This is appropriate in situations where randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are not feasible and non-randomised RWD analyses can offer valuable insights. Nevertheless, depending on how they are designed, RCTs have the potential to produce strong and actionable RWE themselves. The choice of which methodology to employ for RWD studies should be guided by the nature of the research question they are intended to answer. Here, we attempt to define some of the questions that do not necessarily require the conduct of RCTs. Moreover, we outline the strategy of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) to contribute to the generation of robust and high-quality RWE by prioritising the execution of pragmatic trials and studies set up according to the trials-within-cohorts approach. If treatment allocation cannot be left up to random chance due to practical or ethical concerns, the EORTC will consider undertaking observational RWD research based on the target trial principle. New EORTC-sponsored RCTs may also feature concurrent prospective cohorts composed of off-trial patients.

Experiences of Men With Prostate Cancer Participating in a Clinical Pathway With a Supervised Group-based Exercise Program to Combat Androgen Deprivation-Induced Side Effects: A Qualitative Focus Group Study

OBJECTIVES

A clinical pathway in daily practice improved implementation of evidence-based strategies for the management of androgen deprivation-induced side effects in men with prostate cancer. This study aimed to explore patients' expectations and reasons to start with the clinical pathway; explore patients' experiences and attitudes toward the pathway; and identify key pathway ingredients and examine patients' attitudes about a possible transition toward the home environment after a hospital-based pathway participation.

DATA SOURCES

Focus group interviews were conducted through purposeful sampling, consisting of former and current participants of the clinical pathway at Ghent University Hospital. Data was audiotaped and transcribed verbatim, coded in NVivo12, and thematically and inductively analyzed through constant comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Men with prostate cancer have positive experiences toward the use of a holistic multidisciplinary approach (ie, clinical pathway) to combat androgen deprivation therapy-induced side effects in practice. Patients identified several key ingredients of the pathway, such as peer support, physiotherapist involvement, and availability of a multidisciplinary team. Patients were, however, reluctant to continue the exercise component at home because of negative attitudes toward a public gym, practical issues, absence of known facilitators, and other priorities.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Referral by a health care provider remains an important motivator for pathway participation. Peer support, physiotherapist involvement, and availability of a multidisciplinary team are crucial components of the clinical pathway and should be taken into account when developing and implementing similar pathways to increase program uptake in daily practice.

Accuracy and reliability of a commercial treatment planning system in nontarget regions in modern prostate radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The currently available treatment planning systems (TPSs) are neither designed nor intended for accurate dose calculations in nontarget regions. The aim of this work is to quantify the accuracy and reliability of nontarget doses calculated by a commercially available TPS.

METHODS

Nontarget doses calculated by the collapsed cone (CC) (v5.2) algorithm implemented in the RayStation (v6) TPS were compared to measured values. Different scenarios were investigated, from simple static fields to intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans. Deviations and confidence limits (CLs) were calculated between results of calculations and measurements-applying both local (δ) and global (Δ) normalization-for various points of interest (POIs). Results were based on a single-institution experience for one clinical test case (prostate) and evaluated against internationally accepted criteria.

RESULTS

Overall, the TPS underestimated the nontarget dose by an average of -17.7% ± 25.3% for IMRT. Quantitatively similar results were obtained for VMAT (-17.6% ± 21.2%). POIs receiving < 5% of the prescription dose were significantly underestimated by the TPS (p-value < 0.05 for both IMRT and VMAT). Dose calculation accuracy was also determined by the contribution of secondary radiation, with measured doses for out-of-field POIs being significantly different from calculated values (p-value < 0.01 for both IMRT and VMAT). Although the CL_δ in nontarget regions failed the proposed tolerance criteria (40%) for both IMRT (68.8%) and VMAT (52.6%), the CL_Δ was within the tolerance limit (4%) for both treatment techniques (1.9% for IMRT and 1.3% for VMAT). No action levels (7%) were exceeded.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the currently available benchmarks our TPS is considered acceptable for clinical use, although the dose in some POIs was poorly predicted by the CC algorithm. Some areas were pointed out where TPSs and linear accelerator control systems can be improved.

Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer-metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2022

BACKGROUND

Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation together with novel treatment options have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. However, we still lack high-level evidence in many areas relevant to making management decisions in daily clinical practise. The 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) addressed some questions in these areas to supplement guidelines that mostly are based on level 1 evidence.

OBJECTIVE

To present the voting results of the APCCC 2022.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The experts voted on controversial questions where high-level evidence is mostly lacking: locally advanced prostate cancer; biochemical recurrence after local treatment; metastatic hormone-sensitive, non-metastatic, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; oligometastatic prostate cancer; and managing side effects of hormonal therapy. A panel of 105 international prostate cancer experts voted on the consensus questions.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The panel voted on 198 pre-defined questions, which were developed by 117 voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. A total of 116 questions on metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer are discussed in this manuscript. In 2022, the voting was done by a web-based survey because of COVID-19 restrictions.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The voting reflects the expert opinion of these panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results are reported in the supplementary material. We report here on topics in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

These voting results in four specific areas from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting and can help research funders and policy makers identify information gaps and consider what areas to explore further. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions always have to be individualised based on patient characteristics, including the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), co-morbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps where there is non-consensus and that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with healthcare providers worldwide. At each APCCC, an expert panel votes on pre-defined questions that target the most clinically relevant areas of advanced prostate cancer treatment for which there are gaps in knowledge. The results of the voting provide a practical guide to help clinicians discuss therapeutic options with patients and their relatives as part of shared and multidisciplinary decision-making. This report focuses on the advanced setting, covering metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and both non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

TWITTER SUMMARY

Report of the results of APCCC 2022 for the following topics: mHSPC, nmCRPC, mCRPC, and oligometastatic prostate cancer.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

At APCCC 2022, clinically important questions in the management of advanced prostate cancer management were identified and discussed, and experts voted on pre-defined consensus questions. The report of the results for metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer is summarised here.

WNT Pathway Mutations in Metachronous Oligometastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

WNT signaling is a cellular pathway that has been implicated in the development and progression of prostate cancer. Oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) represents a unique state of disease in which metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival. Herein, we investigate the clinical implications of genomic alterations in the WNT signaling cascade in men with omCSPC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective study of 277 men with metachronous omCSPC who underwent targeted DNA sequencing of their primary/metastatic tumor. Patients were classified by presence or absence of pathogenic WNT pathway mutations (in the genes APC, RNF43, and CTNNB1). Pearson χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to determine differences in clinical factors between genomic strata. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival, stratified according to WNT pathway mutation status.

RESULTS

A pathogenic WNT pathway mutation was detected in 11.2% of patients. Patients with WNT pathway mutations were more likely to have visceral metastases (22.6% vs 2.8%; P < .01) and less likely to have regional lymph node metastases (29.0% vs 50.4%; P = .02). At time of oligometastasis, these patients were treated with MDT alone (33.9%), MDT + limited course of systemic therapy (20.6%), systemic therapy alone (22.4%), or observation (defined as no treatment for ≥6 months after metastatic diagnosis). Multivariable cox regression demonstrated WNT pathway mutations associated with significantly worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-12.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Somatic WNT pathway alterations are present in approximately 11% of patients with omCSPC and are associated with an increased likelihood of visceral metastases. Although these patients have a worse natural history, they may benefit from MDT.

Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: systematic review and consensus recommendations by the EORTC-ESTRO OligoCare consortium

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with metastatic cancer, especially when characterised by a low tumour burden (ie, oligometastatic disease), receiving targeted therapy or immunotherapy has become a frequently practised and guideline-supported treatment strategy. Despite the increasing use in routine clinical practice, there is little information on the safety of combining SBRT with modern targeted therapy or immunotherapy and a paucity of high-level evidence to guide clinical management. A systematic literature review was performed to identify the toxicity profiles of combined metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy. These results served as the basis for an international Delphi consensus process among 28 interdisciplinary experts who are members of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) OligoCare consortium. Consensus was sought about risk mitigation strategies of metastases-directed SBRT combined with targeted therapy or immunotherapy; a potential need for and length of interruption to targeted therapy or immunotherapy around SBRT delivery; and potential adaptations of radiation dose and fractionation. Results of this systematic review and consensus process compile the best available evidence for safe combination of metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy for patients with metastatic or oligometastatic cancer and aim to guide today's clinical practice and the design of future clinical trials.

Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Part I: Intermediate-/High-risk and Locally Advanced Disease, Biochemical Relapse, and Side Effects of Hormonal Treatment: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022

BACKGROUND

Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation and the evolution of new therapies have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of clinical topics that greatly impact daily practice. To supplement evidence-based guidelines, the 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) surveyed experts about key dilemmas in clinical management.

OBJECTIVE

To present consensus voting results for select questions from APCCC 2022.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Before the conference, a panel of 117 international prostate cancer experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 198 multiple-choice consensus questions on (1) intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, (2) biochemical recurrence after local treatment, (3) side effects from hormonal therapies, (4) metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, (5) nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, (6) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and (7) oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the 105 physician panel members ("panellists") who directly engage in prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Herein, we present results for the 82 questions on topics 1-3.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The voting results reveal varying degrees of consensus, as is discussed in this article and shown in the detailed results in the Supplementary material. The findings reflect the opinions of an international panel of experts and did not incorporate a formal literature review and meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

These voting results by a panel of international experts in advanced prostate cancer can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers prioritise areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient and cancer characteristics (disease extent and location, treatment history, comorbidities, and patient preferences) and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, therapeutic guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with health care providers and patients worldwide. At each APCCC, a panel of physician experts vote in response to multiple-choice questions about their clinical opinions and approaches to managing advanced prostate cancer. This report presents voting results for the subset of questions pertaining to intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, biochemical relapse after definitive treatment, advanced (next-generation) imaging, and management of side effects caused by hormonal therapies. The results provide a practical guide to help clinicians and patients discuss treatment options as part of shared multidisciplinary decision-making. The findings may be especially useful when there is little or no high-level evidence to guide treatment decisions.

A phase 2 randomized open-label study of oral darolutamide monotherapy vs. androgen deprivation therapy in men with hormone-naive prostate cancer (EORTC-GUCG 1532)

160

Background: Darolutamide is androgen-receptor (AR) inhibitor with low blood–brain barrier penetration and limited potential for clinically relevant drug–drug interactions. Darolutamide has been shown to increase overall survival in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (PC) and, in combination with docetaxel, in men with non-metastatic castration resistant PC. This phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of DARO as a monotherapy without ADT in patients with non-castrate testosterone (T) levels (≥230 ng/dL). Methods: This was a 24-wk, open-label, randomized study of patients with hormone-naïve, histologically confirmed prostate cancer (all stages, with a max of 4 metastatic lesions) requiring hormonal treatment, an ECOG PS score of 0, and a life expectancy >1 y. All patients received DARO 600 mg bid or commercially available LHRH analogue. The primary endpoint is PSA response defined as a ≥ 80% decline at week 24 relative to baseline, in the DARO study arm. The ADT arm is used as an internal control. Secondary endpoints included changes in T levels, safety/tolerability, and quality of life. Results: Among 61 men enrolled, the median (range) age was 72 y (53-86y); 49.2% had metastases; 14.8% and 62.3% had undergone prostatectomy or radiotherapy before study entry. The median (range) of PSA at baseline was 8.9 ng/mL (2.2-333.8). In the DARO arm, the evaluable population with available PSA values at baseline and week 24 consisted of 21 patients. The PSA response rate (>80% PSA decline at wk 24) was 100%, with a median (range) decrease of -99.6% (-94.3, -100) at wk 24 in the DARO arm. Serum T levels increased by a median (range) of 43.4% (5.7-144.0) at wk 24, compared with baseline. In the DARO arm, 45.2% of men reported drug-related AEs (mostly Grade 1 or 2). Most frequent treatment-emergent AEs included gynaecomastia (19.4%), fatigue (12.9%), and hot flush (12.9%). 3.1% of men experienced SAEs, none of which were drug related. HR-QoL measures and ADT arm results will be presented as internal reference. Conclusions: DARO monotherapy (600 mg bid) was associated with significant PSA response in nearly all men with hormone-naïve prostate cancer. Testosterone level changes and most common AEs (gynecomastica, fatigue and hot flush) were consistent with potent AR inhibition. Clinical trial information: NCT02972060 .

Genomic determinants of patterns of failure in metachronous oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer

238

Background: Oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) represents an early state along the progression of metastatic disease in which patients experience improved outcomes compared to those with higher disease burden. Despite the generally more indolent nature, much heterogeneity still exists with some patients experiencing a more aggressive clinical course unexplained by clinical features alone. Here we correlate tumor genomics with modes of progression (MOP) and patterns of failure (POF) following treatment for omCSPC. Methods: We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective study of men treated for metachronous omCSPC, who underwent tumor next generation sequencing (NGS) with at least 1 year of follow-up. Descriptive POF and MOP were reported with respect to presence of genomic alterations in pathways of interest. Genomic pathways of interest included TP53, SPOP, WNT ( APC, CTNNB1, RNF43), DNA double strand break repair, cell cycle genes ( Rb1, CCND1–3, CDKN1B, and CDKN2A), and PI3K/AKT/mTOR. MOP were defined as oligoprogression (1-3 lesions), polyprogression (≥4 lesions), or long-term control (LTC, no radiographic progression at last follow-up). POF included location of lesions at first failure. Overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Genomic associations with patterns/modes of failure were compared with chi-square test. Results: 221 patients were included for analysis with the majority having either 1 (47.5%) or 2 (27.3%) metastatic lesions at oligometastasis. 5-yr OS was associated with MOP 92% vs 89% vs 69% (p<0.01) for LTC, oligo- and polyprogression respectively. TP53 mutations were associated with significantly lower rates of LTC (24.4% vs 46%, p<0.01) and cell cycle mutations associated with high rates of polyprogression (36.7% vs 15.7%, p<0.01). With respect to POF, bone failure was significantly more common within tumors harboring mutations in TP53 (41.2% vs 23.1%, p=0.01) and less common with SPOP mutations (4.2% vs 27.8%, p=0.02). Finally, visceral failures were more common in tumors harboring either WNT pathway (20% vs 5.1%, p<0.01) or SPOP (17.4% vs 5.2%, p=0.04) mutations. Notably, SPOP and WNT pathway mutations cluster together (p<0.01). Conclusions: Tumor genomics provides novel insight into patterns of failure and modes of progression following treatment for metachronous omCSPC. Patients with TP53 and cell cycle mutations have a higher likelihood of progression and TP53, SPOP, and WNT pathway mutations may have a role in metastatic organotropism.

Review of Prospective Trials Assessing the Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Metastasis-directed Treatment in Oligometastatic Genitourinary Cancers

CONTEXT

Emerging evidence supports the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as metastatic-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic genitourinary cancers; however, the prospective data to guide its application as an alternative standard of care remain limited.

OBJECTIVE

To review prospective trials that assess the role of SBRT for patients with genitourinary cancers within a modern framework of oligometastatic disease (OMD) and to highlight clinical scenarios where SBRT may offer a benefit to patients with metastatic cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a critical review of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov in April 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, combined with expert input to identify prospective studies investigating the role of SBRT for oligometastatic prostate, renal, or bladder cancer.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The most commonly studied application of SBRT has been for metachronous oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). Further prospective study is needed to define the role of SBRT in delaying time to next therapy or inducing synergy with other systemic therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT has been associated with high rates of local control and minimal risk of toxicity with multiple trials assessing an MDT-alone approach for oligorecurrent HSPC. From a tumor-agnostic perspective, the clinical benefit of SBRT for OMD has been associated with the ability to extend overall survival. As methods of cancer detection and treatment evolve, expansion of studies that prospectively evaluate SBRT MDT, stratifying by tumor histology and oligometastatic state, is needed to inform optimal patient selection and treatment strategy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We review outcomes from prospective trials assessing the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic genitourinary cancers, which have predominantly investigated SBRT for oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Much work remains to define how SBRT alone compares with other standard of care treatments for prostate cancer or the role of SBRT in tumor control or delaying time to next therapy in oligometastatic renal and bladder cancer.

The Emerging Role of Extracranial Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Although the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been revolutionized by the advent of new systemic agents, still few patients experience a long-term durable response. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is nowadays commonly used as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), but limited data exist on how best to implement this strategy as part of a multimodal approach.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential role of extracranial SABR in mRCC and to identify future therapeutic developments of SABR in different disease settings.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review was conducted in May 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement on the PubMed database. Thirty-four studies were selected for inclusion in this systematic review.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

SABR has been used with four main goals: (1) eradication of the whole metastatic burden in synchronous and metachronous oligometastatic patients, resulting in a long-term local control (LC) rate of >90% and median progression-free survival (PFS) ranging between 8 and 15 mo; (2) eradication of oligoprogressive lesions, enabling an extension of the duration of the systemic therapy by approximately 9 mo; (3) improvement of the response to systemic therapy in polymetastatic patients, resulting in an overall response rate ranging from 17% to 56%; and (4) cytoreduction in polymetastatic mRCC patients, with LC rates ranging between 71% and 100%, and preservation of the renal function, but unclear PFS and overall survival impact. Overall, the combination of SABR and systemic agents has been associated with overall good tolerance, with grade ≥3 toxicity ranging from 0% to 13%.

CONCLUSIONS

Current data highlight the role of SABR as an emerging MDT treatment option in both oligometastatic and oligoprogressive extracranial mRCC, able to ensure long-term disease control and delay the use of next-line systemic therapies. The use of SABR for cytoreduction in the de novo metastatic disease and as an immunological booster in the polymetastatic setting remains investigational and warrants further investigations.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Radiotherapy delivered with ablative doses (>6 Gy per fraction) is a promising treatment strategy for patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Excellent outcome results have been observed in patients with a limited number of metastases, improving metastasis-free survival by several months. For patients with a few metastases progressing under systemic therapy, radiotherapy allows an extension of the duration of the ongoing therapy by several months.

Dosimetric and Hematologic Implications of Prostate-Only Versus Whole Pelvic Radiotherapy: Results of the Multicentric Phase 3 PROPER Study

Objectives: The aim is to evaluate the incidental dose to the lymphatic regions in prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT) and to compare hematological outcome between PORT and whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) in node-positive prostate cancer (pN1 PCa), in the era of modern radiotherapy techniques. Methods: We performed a prospective phase 3 trial in which a total of 64 pN1 PCa patients were randomized between PORT (ARM A) and WPRT (ARM B) delivered with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The lymph node (LN) regions were delineated separately and differences between groups were calculated using Welch t-tests. Hematological toxicity was scored according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.03. To evaluate differences in the evolution of red blood cell (RBC), white blood cell (WBC), and platelet count over time between PORT and WPRT, 3 linear mixed models with a random intercept for the patient was fit with model terms randomization group, study time point, and the interaction between both categorical predictors. Results: Except for dose to the obturator region, the incidental dose to the surrounding LN areas was low in ARM A. None of the patients developed severe hematological toxicity. The change in RBC from time point pre-external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to month 3 and for WBC from time point pre-EBRT to months 3 and 12 was significantly different with ARM B showing a larger decrease. Conclusion: The incidental dose to the lymphatic areas becomes neglectable when PORT is delivered with VMAT. Hematological toxicity is very low after WPRT with VMAT and when bone marrow constraints are used for planning, although WPRT causes a decrease in RBC and WBC count over time.

Using PSMA imaging for prognostication in localized and advanced prostate cancer

The use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed applications in modern prostate cancer management has evolved rapidly over the past few years, helping to establish new treatment pathways and provide further insights into prostate cancer biology. However, the prognostic implications of PSMA-PET have not been studied systematically, owing to rapid clinical implementation without long follow-up periods to determine intermediate-term and long-term oncological outcomes. Currently available data suggest that traditional prognostic factors and survival outcomes are associated with high PSMA expression (both according to immunohistochemistry and PET uptake) in men with localized and biochemically recurrent disease. Treatment with curative intent (primary and/or salvage) often fails when PSMA-positive metastases are present; however, the sensitivity of PSMA-PET in detecting all metastases is poor. Low PSMA-PET uptake in recurrent disease is a favourable prognostic factor; however, it can be associated with poor prognosis in conjunction with high ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clinical trials embedding PSMA-PET for guiding management with reliable oncological outcomes are needed to support ongoing clinical use.

Recommendations for radiation therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer: An ESTRO-ACROP Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Oligometastatic prostate cancer is a new and emerging treatment field with only few prospective randomized studies published so far. Despite the lack of strong level I evidence, metastasis-directed therapies (MDT) are widely used in clinical practice, mainly based on retrospective and small phase 2 studies and with a large difference across centers. Pending results of ongoing prospective randomized trials, there is a clear need for more consistent treatment indications and radiotherapy practices.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) Guidelines Committee consisting of radiation oncologists' experts in prostate cancer was asked to answer a dedicated questionnaire, including 41 questions on the main controversial issues with regard to oligometastatic prostate cancer.

RESULTS

The panel achieved consensus on patient selection and routine use of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) imaging as preferred staging and restaging imaging. MDT strategies are recommended in the de novo oligometastatic, oligorecurrent and oligoprogressive disease setting for nodal, bone and visceral metastases. Radiation therapy doses, volumes and techniques were discussed and commented.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations have the purpose of providing standardization and consensus to optimize the radiotherapy treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer until mature results of randomized trials are available.

Incorporating Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Management Decisions for Men with Newly Diagnosed or Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

CONTEXT

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising molecular target for prostate cancer (PCa) that has allowed the development of a novel diagnostic approach to PCA in the primary and recurrent settings.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize available data and recommendations regarding the use of PSMA in newly diagnosed and recurrent PCa via a narrative review.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Scopus. The search strategy included meta-analyses, reviews, and original studies on staging and restaging with ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Studies comparing PSMA-targeted imaging and conventional imaging suggest superior performance of PSMA-targeted imaging in primary and recurrent PCa, albeit with several clinically relevant limitations. Pretreatment ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT allowed more accurate PCa staging in compared to routine practice for high-risk cases, and identified a number of otherwise unknown metastatic lesions. In biochemically recurrent PCa, PSMA PET can reveal sites of recurrence with greater sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging, potentially detecting a major proportion of occult disease. This review will help providers in applying the most up-to-date and relevant literature to (1) determine which patients truly have oligometastatic disease and (2) ascertain who is most likely to experience a meaningful response to local consolidation in the biochemical recurrence setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Data on PSMA diagnostic studies in primary and recurrent PCa highlight the accuracy and clinical application of PSMA PET. While this review and the evidence to date might lead to a perception of superiority in metastasis directed therapy, fundamental lack of phase III clinical trials with clinically meaningful outcomes are yet to be determined.

PATIENT SUMMARY

PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) scans have shown great promise for initial evaluation of prostate cancer (PCa) and in detection of PCa recurrence. The benefits are more apparent for initial staging of PCa. There are more limited clinical trial results for PCa recurrence on how best to use this new technique to guide cancer treatment.

Clinical Trial Protocol for ProBio: An Outcome-adaptive and Randomised Multiarm Biomarker-driven Study in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer

ProBio is an outcome-adaptive, multiarm, multiple-assignment randomised, biomarker-driven platform trial in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Here we describe the amended clinical protocol, focusing on expansion of the trial to include patients with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.