[Prevention of radiation-induced diarrhea by smectite. Results of a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study]

PURPOSE

Diarrhea and abdominal pain are well-known side effects abdominal or pelvic of radiation therapy that may lead to interruption of treatment in serious cases. In recent trials the silicate smectite has proven a promising drug in the prophylaxis of these adverse events. The presented trial aimed at the verification of earlier studies and the evaluation of a dose-effect relationship.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1994 and May 1995, a total of 176 patients obtaining radiotherapy of the pelvis or the abdomen were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled investigation regarding the prophylactic effect of smectite (= Colina) against radiotherapy-induced diarrhea. During the whole period of radiotherapy 85 patients obtained 2 x 6 g smectite daily and 91 patients received 2 x 6 g placebo. The primary end point of the analysis was the time to the first appearance of diarrhea (> or = 3 pappy stools).

RESULTS

All 176 patients were evaluated according to an intent-to-treat analysis. There was no significant difference between the prophylactic effects of smectite and placebo. For an explorative post-hoc analysis the total study group was split up into 2 subgroups, one with an irradiated small bowel volume < or = 837.5 ml, the other with a small bowel volume > 837.5 ml (median); the analysis indicated that the first subgroup showed a benefit for the smectite-treated patients in contrast to the placebo treatment (32 vs. 18 calendar days to the first appearance of diarrhea). This benefit was statistically not significant.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic application of smectite during irradiation of the pelvis and the abdomen can delay the development of radiotherapy-induced diarrhea, a statistical significance could not be verified neither in the total study group nor in the post-hoc subgroup analysis.

Supportive use of amifostine in patients with head and neck tumors undergoing radio-chemotherapy. Is it possible to limit the duration of the application of amifostine?

BACKGROUND

Amifostine is a new cancer-supporting agent to protect normal tissue in patients receiving radio-chemotherapy. The main question of our study is whether the application of amifostine can be limited on the duration of chemotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck tumors undergoing radio-chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a randomized study 14 patients were treated with amifostine (500 mg, day 1 to 5 and 29 to 33) during concurrent radio-chemotherapy with carboplatin (70 mg/m2, day 1 to 5 and 29 to 33), 14 patients were treated without amifostine. The analyzed parameters were dermatitis, mucositis, skin temperature, white blood and platelet count, creatinine and scintigram of salivary glands. Median survival of the amifostine group was 19 months, of the control group 10 months.

RESULTS

There were no relevant differences in all analyzed parameters between both arms of the study.

CONCLUSION

Our form of amifostine application is probably not able to obtain a relevant reduction of the toxicity of radio-chemotherapy.

[Simultaneous radiochemotherapy with carboplatin in patients with inoperable advanced stage III and IV head and neck tumors]

BACKGROUND

The results of treating advanced tumors in the head and neck region with radiotherapy alone are disappointing. Concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy may improve this situation. The treatment results of concurrent radiochemotherapy at the University of Rostock were analyzed retrospectively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1991 to 1996 92 patients with head and neck tumors were treated with concurrent radiochemotherapy (1.8 to 63 Gy; 70 mg/m2 carboplatin day 1 to 5 and 29 to 33) with palliative tumor resection (n = 37) or without surgical treatment (n = 55). Remission rate, overall survival and disease-free survival, local control and acute toxicity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Six weeks after radiochemotherapy 56.5% of patients had a complete remission, 36% a partial remission and 7.5% "no change". With a median follow-up of 42 months (6 to 74 months) overall survival, disease-free survival and local control were 24.3%, 28.9%, 18.0% 5 years after treatment. All these criteria were significantly better in patients with palliative tumor resection compared to no surgical treatment (uni- and multivariate) and in patients with Stage III than in patients with Stage IV carcinomas (univariate), overall survival was significantly better in patients with Stage III (multivariate). A pretherapeutic Hb level below 7.0 mmol/l (11.27 g/dl) reduced the local control significantly (uni- and multivariate). Grade III and IV mucositis was detected in 10%, Grade III leucopenia in 12% of treated patients. Grade IV leucopenia and Grade III thrombopenia were observed in 1 patient each.

CONCLUSION

The toxicity of this treatment is tolerable. However, additional trials must be conducted before considering the palliative tumor resection as standard therapy.

Fluconazole prophylaxis in patients with head and neck tumours undergoing radiation and radiochemotherapy

The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of Candida stomatitis and resulting interruptions in radiation and radiochemotherapy in 50 patients suffering from squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region receiving fluconazole (100 mg d-1) in comparison with a historical control group (n = 50) without specific prophylaxis. Twenty of the control patients (40%) demonstrated Candida stomatitis, with seven of them (14%) requiring interruptions in anticancer therapy. In contrast, none of the patients with fluconazole had evidence of Candida stomatitis (P = 0.0000051) and subsequent interruption of anti-cancer therapy (P = 0.0061). Laboratory monitoring for the presence of Candida species was performed in 30 patients before and after therapy with fluconazole. Candida albicans was identified less frequently after therapy when compared with the pretreatment status. However, C. glabrata and C. krusei were isolated in some of the patients, probably because of drug resistance of these subspecies. The results demonstrate the clinical usefulness of prophylactic fluconazole applications in patients suffering from head and neck tumours with the aim of reducing Candida stomatitis and the resulting interruptions in radiation and radiochemotherapy.

[Use of fluconazole as antimycotic prophylaxis in radiotherapy of patients with head and neck tumors]

The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of Candida stomatitis and resulting interruptions in radiation therapy in 50 patients suffering from squamous cell carcinomas of head and neck region receiving fluconazole (100 mg/d) in comparison to a historical control group without specific prophylaxis. 20 of the control patients (40%) demonstrated Candida stomatitis with 7 of them (14%) requiring interruptions of radiation therapy. In contrast, none of the patients with fluconazole had evidence of Candida stomatitis and subsequent interruption of anticancer therapy. Laboratory monitoring for the presence of Candida species was performed in 15 other patients before and after therapy with fluconazole. Candida albicans was identified less frequently after therapy when compared to the pretreatment status. However, C. glabrata and C. krusei were isolated in some of the patients probably due to decreased drug susceptibility of these species. The results demonstrate the clinical usefulness of prophylactic fluconazole applications in patients suffering from head and neck tumors with the aim to reduce Candida stomatitis and resulting interruptions in radiation therapy.

[Influence of reduction of radiation dosage on the incidence of radiation-induced pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis and pericarditis after mediastinal irradiation in the treatment of lymphogranulomatosis]

BACKGROUND

The amount of radiation dose applied in the treatment of Hodgkin's disease is associated with the incidence of complications including radiation-induced pneumonitis, lung fibrosis and pericarditis. Therefore, from the beginning of 1986, we have started to apply a radiation therapy approach with reduced doses in order to minimize complications while maintaining effective treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From 1983 through 1992 141 patients suffering from Hodgkin's disease were included in the present study. All of them were treated by radiation of mediastinum. In 126 cases polychemotherapy was applied before radiation. From 1986 we used a reduced radiation dose in cases that were treated by radiation alone (affected nodal regions with 40 Gy instead of 45 Gy and unaffected nodal regions with 36 Gy instead of 40 Gy) as well as after application of chemotherapy (affected nodal regions 36 Gy instead of 40 Gy and unaffected nodal regions with 30 Gy instead of 36 Gy). Ninety-five patients were treated according to the new therapy protocol. Forty-six patients had been treated with the higher dosages and served as the historical control group. Radiation therapy included Co-60, 15-MV and 9-MV photons, and 15-MeV and 9-MeV electrons. Serial thoracic X-ray controls were performed. CT scans, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic investigations were added in selected cases.

RESULTS

During the period from 1983 to 1992, we diagnosed radiation-induced pneumonitis in 31% of the patients who underwent radiation therapy of the mediastinum. In addition, 16% demonstrated lung fibrosis and 10% pericarditis. After implementation of the reduced radiation dosages, the incidence of pneumonitis decreased from 35% to 24% (nearly significant in the 5% range), lung fibrosis from 24% to 12% (p < 0.05) and pericarditis from 26% to 2% (p < 0.01). The efficacy of treatment remained unaffected by the new therapy approach as has been demonstrated for cumulative survival data and recurrence-free intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction of radiation dose in patients with Hodgkin's disease who undergo mediastinal radiation leads to a decrease in the incidence of radiation-induced complications (pneumonitis, lung fibrosis, pericarditis) whereas treatment efficacy remains unchanged.