Effect of Urate-Elevating Inosine on Early Parkinson Disease Progression: The SURE-PD3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Urate elevation, despite associations with crystallopathic, cardiovascular, and metabolic disorders, has been pursued as a potential disease-modifying strategy for Parkinson disease (PD) based on convergent biological, epidemiological, and clinical data.

Objective

To determine whether sustained urate-elevating treatment with the urate precursor inosine slows early PD progression.

Design, Participants, and Setting

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of oral inosine treatment in early PD. A total of 587 individuals consented, and 298 with PD not yet requiring dopaminergic medication, striatal dopamine transporter deficiency, and serum urate below the population median concentration (<5.8 mg/dL) were randomized between August 2016 and December 2017 at 58 US sites, and were followed up through June 2019.

Interventions

Inosine, dosed by blinded titration to increase serum urate concentrations to 7.1-8.0 mg/dL (n = 149) or matching placebo (n = 149) for up to 2 years.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was rate of change in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS; parts I-III) total score (range, 0-236; higher scores indicate greater disability; minimum clinically important difference of 6.3 points) prior to dopaminergic drug therapy initiation. Secondary outcomes included serum urate to measure target engagement, adverse events to measure safety, and 29 efficacy measures of disability, quality of life, cognition, mood, autonomic function, and striatal dopamine transporter binding as a biomarker of neuronal integrity.

Results

Based on a prespecified interim futility analysis, the study closed early, with 273 (92%) of the randomized participants (49% women; mean age, 63 years) completing the study. Clinical progression rates were not significantly different between participants randomized to inosine (MDS-UPDRS score, 11.1 [95% CI, 9.7-12.6] points per year) and placebo (MDS-UPDRS score, 9.9 [95% CI, 8.4-11.3] points per year; difference, 1.26 [95% CI, -0.59 to 3.11] points per year; P = .18). Sustained elevation of serum urate by 2.03 mg/dL (from a baseline level of 4.6 mg/dL; 44% increase) occurred in the inosine group vs a 0.01-mg/dL change in serum urate in the placebo group (difference, 2.02 mg/dL [95% CI, 1.85-2.19 mg/dL]; P<.001). There were no significant differences for secondary efficacy outcomes including dopamine transporter binding loss. Participants randomized to inosine, compared with placebo, experienced fewer serious adverse events (7.4 vs 13.1 per 100 patient-years) but more kidney stones (7.0 vs 1.4 stones per 100 patient-years).

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients recently diagnosed as having PD, treatment with inosine, compared with placebo, did not result in a significant difference in the rate of clinical disease progression. The findings do not support the use of inosine as a treatment for early PD.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02642393.

Efficacy of Istradefylline, an Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonist, as Adjunctive Therapy to Levodopa in Parkinson's Disease: A Pooled Analysis of 8 Phase 2b/3 Trials

BACKGROUND

Istradefylline is a selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist for the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing OFF episodes while on levodopa/decarboxylase inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE

This pooled analysis of eight randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2b/3 studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of istradefylline.

METHODS

Istradefylline was evaluated in PD patients receiving levodopa with carbidopa/benserazide and experiencing motor fluctuations. Eight 12- or 16-week trials were conducted (n = 3,245); four of these studies were the basis for istradefylline's FDA approval. Change in OFF time as assessed in patient-completed 24-h PD diaries at Week 12 was the primary endpoint. All studies were designed with common methodology, thereby permitting pooling of data. Pooled analysis results from once-daily oral istradefylline (20 and 40 mg/day) and placebo were evaluated using a mixed-model repeated-measures approach including study as a factor.

RESULTS

Among 2,719 patients (placebo, n = 992; 20 mg/day, n = 848; 40 mg/day, n = 879), OFF hours/day were reduced at Week 12 at istradefylline dosages of 20 mg/day (least-squares mean difference [LSMD] from placebo in reduction from baseline [95%CI], -0.38 h [-0.61, -0.15]) and 40 mg/day (-0.45 h [-0.68, -0.22], p < 0.0001); ON time without troublesome dyskinesia (ON-WoTD) significantly increased. Similar results were found in the four-study pool (OFF hours/day, 20 mg/day, -0.75 h [-1.10, -0.40]; 40 mg/day, -0.82 h [-1.17, -0.47]). Istradefylline was generally well-tolerated; the average study completion rate among istradefylline-treated patients across all studies was 89.2%. Dyskinesia was the most frequent adverse event (placebo, 9.6%; 20 mg/day, 16.1%; 40 mg/day, 17.7%).

CONCLUSION

In this pooled analysis, istradefylline significantly improved OFF time and ON-WoTD relative to placebo and was well-tolerated.

EASE LID 2: A 2-Year Open-Label Trial of Gocovri (Amantadine) Extended Release for Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

Gocovri® (amantadine) extended release capsules are approved for the treatment of dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) receiving levodopa-based therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Gocovri in patients with PD experiencing levodopa-induced dyskinesia.

METHODS

In this 2-year open-label trial, patients completing double-blind Gocovri clinical trials or excluded from prior trials because of deep-brain stimulation (DBS) received Gocovri 274 mg once daily at bedtime. The primary objective was to evaluate long-term safety and tolerability. In addition, dyskinesia and OFF time were assessed using Part IV (Motor Complications) scores on the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS).

RESULTS

Among 223 enrolled patients (mean PD duration, 11.7 years; mean levodopa use, 9.3 years), 75.8% completed 1 year of treatment and 57.8% completed the trial, with a median treatment duration of 1.9 years. Common adverse events were fall (32.7%), hallucination (24.2%), peripheral edema (16.1%), constipation (13.5%), and urinary tract infection (10.3%); 31 patients (13.9%) discontinued because of adverse events considered related to study drug. At baseline, MDS-UPDRS Part IV scores were lower for patients continuing Gocovri (mean, 6.5 points) than for previous placebo (9.4) or DBS groups (10.5) but were similar for all groups by week 8 (6.3, 6.2, 6.4, respectively), and remained low for the duration of the trial (at week 100: 6.9, 7.3, 7.0, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PD, Gocovri showed long-term safety and tolerability consistent with double-blind trial findings, and durable reduction in motor complications (dyskinesia and OFF time).

On demand therapy for Parkinson's disease patients: Opportunities and choices

Levodopa is the most effective symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), but a major treatment challenge is that over time, many patients experience periods of return of PD symptoms intermittently through the day, known as OFF periods. OFF periods typically manifest as a return of motor symptoms but can also involve non-motor symptoms and these periods can disrupt good control despite optimization of the oral levodopa regimen. OFF periods emerge in large measure due to a shortening of the duration of clinical benefit from oral levodopa, thought to be related to a progressive loss of dopamine neurons and their ability to store and release levodopa-derived dopamine over many hours. The problem is further compounded by impaired absorption of oral levodopa due to gastroparesis and other factors limiting its uptake in the small intestine, including competition for uptake by meals and their protein content. On-demand therapies are now available for the treatment of OFF episodes in PD and are administered intermittently, on an as-needed basis, on top of the patient's maintenance medication regimen. To be useful, an on-demand medication should take effect more rapidly and reliably than oral levodopa. Options for on-demand therapy for OFF periods have recently increased with the approval of levodopa inhalation powder and sublingual apomorphine as alternatives to the older option of subcutaneous apomorphine injection, each of which avoids the gastrointestinal tract and its potential for absorption delay. On-demand therapy is now available for patients experiencing episodic or intermittent need for rapid and reliable onset of benefit. On-demand therapy may also provide an alternative to more invasive treatment such as infusion of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel and for patients whose OFF episodes are not controlled despite deep brain stimulation.

Solriamfetol for Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Parkinson's Disease: Phase 2 Proof-of-Concept Trial

Background

Solriamfetol is approved (US and EU) for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea.

Objectives

Evaluate solriamfetol safety/efficacy for EDS in Parkinson's disease (PD).

Methods

Phase 2, double‐blind, 4‐week, crossover trial: adults with PD and EDS were randomized to sequence A (placebo, solriamfetol 75, 150, 300 mg/d), B (solriamfetol 75, 150, 300 mg/d, placebo), or C (placebo). Outcomes (safety/tolerability [primary]; Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]; Maintenance of Wakefulness Test [MWT]) were assessed weekly. P values are nominal.

Results

Common adverse events (n = 66): nausea (10.7%), dizziness (7.1%), dry mouth (7.1%), headache (7.1%), anxiety (5.4%), constipation (5.4%), dyspepsia (5.4%). ESS decreased both placebo (−4.78) and solriamfetol (−4.82 to −5.72; P > 0.05). MWT improved dose‐dependently with solriamfetol, increasing by 5.05 minutes with 300 mg relative to placebo (P = 0.0098).

Conclusions

Safety/tolerability was consistent with solriamfetol's known profile. There were no significant improvements on ESS; MWT results suggest possible benefit with solriamfetol in PD. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Effects of Gocovri (Amantadine) Extended-Release Capsules on Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living in People with Parkinson's Disease and Dyskinesia

Introduction

Gocovri, a bedtime-administered delayed-release/extended-release capsule formulation of amantadine, is the only drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as levodopa-adjunctive therapy for the treatment of OFF episodes and/or dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Part II of the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) assesses patient-perceived disability on experiences of daily living affected by PD motor symptoms. We analyzed Gocovri-related changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II ratings in two placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Methods

Baseline to week 12 changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II total and item scores were compared for Gocovri and placebo using pooled data from phase 3 trials (EASE LID and EASE LID 3).

Results

Baseline mean MDS-UPDRS Part II total score was 15.1 for Gocovri (n = 100) and 15.3 for placebo (n = 96) groups. At week 12, the least squares mean change from baseline was −3.4 for the Gocovri group and −1.4 for placebo (treatment difference, −2.0; 95% CI −3.3 to −0.7; P = 0.004). For Gocovri, change from baseline exceeded a published minimal clinically important difference threshold of 3.05. Gocovri-related treatment differences over placebo were driven primarily by improvement in the scale items of freezing (−0.4; P < 0.0001), tremor (−0.4; P = 0.002), getting out of bed/car/deep chair (−0.3; P = 0.002), and eating tasks (−0.2; P = 0.016).

Conclusion

In addition to improvement in dyskinesia, Gocovri-treated participants experienced improvement in motor aspects of experiences of daily living. Analyses suggest that Gocovri may specifically improve freezing, tremor, getting out of bed/car/deep chair, and eating tasks.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02136914, NCT02274766.

Amantadine ER (Gocovri®) Significantly Increases ON Time Without Any Dyskinesia: Pooled Analyses From Pivotal Trials in Parkinson's Disease

Background: Clinical trials for antiparkinsonian drugs aimed at managing motor complications typically use patient diaries to divide levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) into "troublesome" and "non-troublesome" categories. Yet, given the choice, most patients would prefer to live without experiencing any dyskinesia. However, the concept of evaluating time spent ON without any dyskinesia as an outcome has never been tested. We conducted analyses of pooled Gocovri pivotal trial data in order to evaluate the extent to which Gocovri increased the time PD patients spent ON without dyskinesia (troublesome or non-troublesome), beyond its already identified improvement in reducing troublesome dyskinesia. Methods: Patients enrolled in phase 3 trials (EASE LID [NCT02136914] or EASE LID 3 [NCT02274766]) recorded time spent in the following PD diary states at baseline and Week 12 (endpoint): asleep, OFF, ON with troublesome dyskinesia, ON with non-troublesome dyskinesia, and ON without dyskinesia. Mixed model repeated measures analyses with estimated Cohen D effect sizes were performed on the modified intent to treat population to evaluate changes in time spent in these states. Results: Patients randomized to receive Gocovri showed an increase in ON time without dyskinesia and corresponding decreases in ON time with dyskinesia and OFF time vs. placebo. Treatment effects were statistically significant for Gocovri vs. placebo starting at Week 2 and were sustained until Week 12. On MMRM analysis at Week 12, patients in the Gocovri group showed an adjusted mean ± SE increase over placebo of 2.9 ± 0.6 h in ON time without dyskinesia (Cohen D effect size 0.79) and an adjusted mean ± SE decrease of -1.9 ± 0.6 h in ON time with dyskinesia (troublesome + non-troublesome) (Cohen D effect size 0.49), that included a -1.5 ± 0.4 h placebo-adjusted reduction in ON time with troublesome dyskinesia and a -0.6 ± 0.4 h reduction in ON time with non-troublesome dyskinesia. OFF time was reduced by -1.0 ± 0.3 h compared to placebo. Conclusions: Gocovri treatment more than doubled the daily time patients spent ON without dyskinesia. These results suggest that the Gocovri treatment effect was driven by a reduction in overall motor complications including ON time with both troublesome and non-troublesome dyskinesia as well as time spent OFF.

Istradefylline - a first generation adenosine A2A antagonist for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Introduction It is now accepted that Parkinson's disease (PD) is not simply due to dopaminergic dysfunction, and there is interest in developing non-dopaminergic approaches to disease management. Adenosine A_2A receptor antagonists represent a new way forward in the symptomatic treatment of PD.Areas covered In this narrative review, we summarize the literature supporting the utility of adenosine A_2A antagonists in PD with a specific focus on istradefylline, the most studied and only adenosine A_2A antagonist currently in clinical use.Expert opinion: At this time, the use of istradefylline in the treatment of PD is limited to the management of motor fluctuations as supported by the results of randomized clinical trials and evaluation by Japanese and USA regulatory authorities. The relatively complicated clinical development of istradefylline was based on classically designed studies conducted in PD patients with motor fluctuations on an optimized regimen of levodopa plus adjunctive dopaminergic medications. In animal models, there is consensus that a more robust effect of istradefylline in improving motor function is produced when combined with low or threshold doses of levodopa rather than with high doses that produce maximal dopaminergic improvement. Exploration of istradefylline as a 'levodopa sparing' strategy in earlier PD would seem warranted.

Sustained functional benefits after a single set of injections with abobotulinumtoxinA using a 2-mL injection volume in adults with cervical dystonia: 12-week results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3b study

Cervical dystonia (CD) is primarily treated with botulinum toxin, at intervals of ≥ 12 weeks. We present efficacy, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and safety in adults with CD at the last available visit after a single set of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) injections versus placebo using 500 U in a 2-mL injection volume. In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind trial, patients were ≥ 18 years of age with primary idiopathic CD, had a Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) total score ≥ 20, and TWSTRS-Severity subscale score > 10 at baseline. Patients (N = 134) were randomized (2:1) to aboBoNT-A (n = 89) or placebo (n = 45), with aboBoNT-A patients treated with 500 units (U) if toxin-naïve, and 250 to 500 U based on previous onabotulinumtoxinA dose if non-naïve. Endpoints included total TWSTRS, Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-Pain; 24-hour), Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication, and other PROs for pain, depression, and global health. Results are for the intent-to-treat population, with "Week 12" (Wk12) comprising the last available post-baseline assessment (end-of-study or early withdrawal). Mean TWSTRS total scores improved from 42.5 at baseline to 35.4 at Wk12 with aboBoNT-A and 42.4 to 40.4 with placebo (treatment difference: -4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.5, -1.1; p = 0.011). At Wk12, mean (95% CI) change from baseline in NRS-Pain was -1.0 (-1.59, -0.45) for aboBoNT-A and -0.2 (-0.96, 0.65) for placebo. AboBoNT-A demonstrated numeric improvements in other PROs. More aboBoNT-A-treated patients than patients receiving placebo reported being at least "somewhat satisfied" with treatment (60.4% vs 42.2%, respectively), symptom relief (57.0% vs 40.0%), and time for treatment to work (55.8% vs 33.3%). No new adverse events were reported. Results indicate that in patients with CD, treatment with aboBoNT-A using a 2-mL injection provided sustained improvement in the TWSTRS total score and patient-perceived benefits up to 12 weeks. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identified: NCT01753310.

Duration of benefit per Dose: Carbidopa-Levodopa immediate release vs. extended release capsules (Rytary®)

BACKGROUND

For patients with Parkinson's disease, clinicians commonly assess duration of benefit for individual doses of levodopa in order to consider medication changes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the mean duration of ON time per dose and mean duration of ON time without troublesome dyskinesia (WoTD) per dose of CD-LD IR vs. CD-LD ER in the ADVANCE-PD trial.

METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis of the ADVANCE-PD trial. Mean ON time per dose and ON time WoTD was calculated at baseline and end-of-study (EOS). Changes were compared between CD-LD IR and CD-LD ER (Rytary®) treatment groups using an ANCOVA model.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) baseline ON time per dose of CD-LD IR (n = 393) was 2.20 h. Patients randomized to double-blind treatment with CD-LD IR (n = 192) experienced an increase in mean ON time per dose from baseline to EOS from 2.24 h to 2.38 h. In comparison, patients randomized to double-blind treatment with CD-LD ER (n = 201) experienced an increase in mean ON time per dose from baseline (on CD-LD IR) to EOS (on CD-LD ER) from 2.17 h to 3.55 h. Conversion and optimization with CD-LD ER increased ON time per dose by 1.21 h more than optimization of CD-LD IR (p < 0.0001). Similarly, CD-LD ER increased ON time WoTD per dose by 1.16 h more than CD-LD IR (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In the ADVANCE-PD trial, CD-LD ER significantly increased ON time per dose compared to CD-LD IR (+1.21 h, p < 0.0001) and provided significantly more ON time per dose (3.55 h vs 2.38 h, p < 0.0001).

The challenge of developing adenosine A2A antagonists for Parkinson disease: Istradefylline, preladenant, and tozadenant

Laboratory and clinical experience have pointed to the value of targeting motor pathways emerging from the striatum to treat problems arising in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). These pathways are selectively populated with a subtype of adenosine binding sites (A_2A receptors) that offer a target for improving PD symptomatology. Several compounds were developed that possess high selectivity and potency for blocking this receptor. Three of these compounds - istradefylline, preladenant, and tozadenant - were chosen for clinical development programs that culminated in Phase 3 multicenter randomized clinical trials. Each of these drugs exert virtually no off-target neurochemical effects. Clinical trials with these drugs focused upon reducing OFF time when administered adjunctly to levodopa and other antiparkinsonian medications. Despite promising Phase 2 data, preladenant did not show efficacy when tested in a randomized placebo-controlled Phase 3 clinical trial. Reports of hematological toxicity necessitated ceasing an ongoing Phase 3 investigation of tozadenant. Following a challenging approval process, based on the results of randomized clinical trials carried out in the U.S. and Japan, istradefylline received approval in these countries for treatment of OFF episodes.

Medical Management and Prevention of Motor Complications in Parkinson's Disease

Levodopa is the most effective medication for the treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. However, over time, the clinical response to levodopa becomes complicated by a reduction in the duration and reliability of motor improvement (motor fluctuations) and the emergence of involuntary movements (levodopa-induced dyskinesia). Strategies that have been attempted in an effort to delay the development of these motor complications include levodopa sparing and continuous dopaminergic therapy. Once motor complications occur, a wide array of medical treatments is available to maximize motor function through the day while limiting dyskinesia. Here, we review the clinical features, epidemiology, and risk factors for the development of motor complications, as well as strategies for their prevention and medical management.

Duration of Symptom Relief Between Injections for AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) in Spastic Paresis and Cervical Dystonia: Comparison of Evidence From Clinical Studies

Background: Botulinum toxin-A is a well-established treatment for adult and pediatric spastic paresis and cervical dystonia. While guidelines and approved labels indicate that treatment should not occur more frequently than every 12 weeks, studies and real-world evidence show that the timing of symptom recurrence between treatments may vary. Methods: We report retreatment criteria and response duration (retreatment intervals) from four pivotal, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with open-label extensions involving patients treated with abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNTA) for upper limb (NCT01313299) or lower limb (NCT01249404) spastic paresis in adults, lower limb spastic paresis in children (NCT01249417), and cervical dystonia in adults (NCT00257660). We review results in light of recently available preclinical data. Results: In spastic paresis, 24.0-36.9% of upper limb patients treated with aboBoNTA and 20.1-32.0% of lower limb patients did not require retreatment before 16 weeks. Moreover, 72.8-93.8% of aboBoNTA-treated pediatric patients with lower limb spastic paresis did not require retreatment before 16 weeks (17.7-54.0% did not require retreatment before 28 weeks). In aboBoNTA-treated patients with cervical dystonia, 72.6-81.5% did not require retreatment before 16 weeks. Conclusion: AboBoNTA, when dosed as recommended, offers symptom relief beyond 12 weeks to many patients with spastic paresis and cervical dystonia. From recently available preclinical research, the amount of active neurotoxin administered with aboBoNTA might be a factor in explaining this long duration of response.

Carbidopa and Levodopa Extended Release Capsules in Patients with and without Troublesome and Non-Troublesome Dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

Carbidopa (CD) and levodopa (LD) extended release (CD-LD ER) capsules are designed to combine both immediate and extended release pharmacokinetics. In the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, ADVANCE-PD trial, patients randomized to CD-LD ER experienced a 1.17-hour greater reduction in OFF time compared to patients randomized to CD-LD IR (p < 0.0001).

OBJECTIVE

To compare CD-LD IR optimization to CD-LD ER conversion based on patient dyskinesia status at baseline using data from the ADVANCE-PD trial.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of the ADVANCE-PD study. Patients were categorized by dyskinesia status at baseline into 1) those who had No Dyskinesia (ND), 2) those who had Non-Troublesome Dyskinesia Only (NTDO), and 3) those who had Troublesome Dyskinesia (TD).

RESULTS

Comparative reductions in OFF time favoring CD-LD ER over CD-LD IR were similar for the ND (-1.08 h, p = 0.0071, n = 183) and NTDO (-1.12 h, p = 0.0104, n = 131) groups, and smaller for the TD group (-0.82 h, p = 0.2382, n = 79). Reductions in OFF time for both CD-LD ER conversion and CD-LD IR adjustment were largest within the ND group and smallest within the TD group (CD-LD ER: ND -2.86 h, NTDO -2.11 h, TD -1.36 h; CD-LD IR: ND -1.78 h, NTDO -0.99 h, TD -0.55 h).

CONCLUSION

Responses to both CD-LD IR adjustment and CD-LD ER conversion depended on baseline dyskinesia status. Significant reductions in OFF time with CD-LD ER compared to CD-LD IR were observed in the ND and NTDO groups. In the TD group, comparing CD-LD ER conversion to CD-LD IR optimization, benefits were still observed, but there was less reduction in OFF time, less reduction in troublesome dyskinesia, and fewer patients self-rated themselves much or very much improved than in the ND and NTDO groups. These data suggest that in clinical practice, the best chances for success with conversion from CD-LD IR to CD-LD ER are in patients without TD.

Prevalence of Dyskinesia and OFF by 30-Minute Intervals Through the Day and Assessment of Daily Episodes of Dyskinesia and OFF: Novel Analyses of Diary Data from Gocovri Pivotal Trials

Background:

Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients using levodopa commonly develop dyskinesia and OFF episodes that reduce quality of life.

Objective:

Evaluate prevalence of troublesome dyskinesia and OFF through the day, assessed by 30-minute intervals, as well as the mean number and duration of troublesome dyskinesia and OFF episodes, transitions between PD states, and effects of Gocovri^® (amantadine) extended release capsules on these episodes.

Methods:

Evaluate diary data from pooled Gocovri phase 3, placebo-controlled trials—analyzed for 17 hours following wake-up—at baseline and week 12.

Results:

Diaries were evaluable for 162 patients. At baseline, 67% of patients woke up OFF, with prevalence decreasing to 13% at 2 hours and then remaining relatively steady at ∼12% (range, 6–17%) across half-hour intervals thereafter. Troublesome dyskinesia prevalence rose steadily from 5% to 24% over the first 2 hours, then fluctuated between 20% and 44% through the rest of the waking day. At baseline, patients experienced a mean of 3.0 daily episodes of troublesome dyskinesia (average duration 2.0 hours each), and 2.2 daily episodes of OFF (average duration 1.1 hour each). At week 12, Gocovri-treated patients showed greater reductions than placebo in troublesome dyskinesia and OFF episodes per day (treatment difference: –1.0 episodes and –0.4 episodes, respectively) and average episode duration (treatment difference: –0.6 hours and –0.3 hours, respectively). Mean duration of individual episodes of ON without troublesome dyskinesia (Good ON) increased by 5.0 hours for Gocovri, compared with 2.0 hours for placebo. Patients taking Gocovri experienced 2.2 fewer transitions between states than patients taking placebo.

Conclusions:

Troublesome dyskinesia and OFF occurred in the morning and throughout the waking day. Gocovri-treated patients experienced fewer, shorter episodes of both troublesome dyskinesia and OFF, thereby increasing the duration of continuous Good ON episodes and reducing the frequency of transitions between motor states.

Parkinson Disease and Orthostatic Hypotension in the Elderly: Recognition and Management of Risk Factors for Falls

Parkinson disease (PD) is often associated with postural instability and gait dysfunction that can increase the risk for falls and associated consequences, including injuries, increased burden on healthcare resources, and reduced quality of life. Patients with PD have nearly twice the risk for falls and associated bone fractures compared with their general population counterparts of similar age. Although the cause of falls in patients with PD may be multifactorial, an often under-recognized factor is neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH). nOH is a sustained decrease in blood pressure upon standing whose symptomology can include dizziness/lightheadedness, weakness, fatigue, and syncope. nOH is due to dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system compensatory response to standing and is a consequence of the neurodegenerative processes of PD. The symptoms associated with orthostatic hypotension (OH)/nOH can increase the risk of falls, and healthcare professionals may not be aware of the real-world clinical effect of nOH, the need for routine screening, or the value of early diagnosis of nOH when treating elderly patients with PD. nOH is easily missed and, importantly, healthcare providers may not realize that there are effective treatments for nOH symptoms that could help lessen the fall risk resulting from the condition. This review discusses the burden of, and key risk factors for, falls among patients with PD, with a focus on practical approaches for the recognition, assessment, and successful management of OH/nOH. In addition, insights are provided as to how fall patterns can suggest fall etiology, thereby influencing the choice of intervention.

Pharmacokinetics of ADS-5102 (Amantadine) Extended Release Capsules Administered Once Daily at Bedtime for the Treatment of Dyskinesia

BACKGROUND

Preclinical and clinical studies suggest amantadine immediate-release (IR) may reduce dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD), although higher doses are associated with increased CNS adverse events (AEs). ADS-5102 is an extended release amantadine capsule formulation, designed for once-daily dosing at bedtime (qhs) to provide high concentrations upon waking and throughout the day, with lower concentrations in the evening. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of ADS-5102 were assessed in two phase I studies in healthy subjects, and a blinded, randomized phase II/III dose-finding study in PD patients.

METHODS

The first phase I study assessed single ADS-5102 doses (68.5, 137, and 274 mg) in a crossover design, whereas the second phase I study evaluated ADS-5102 137 mg for 7 days followed by amantadine IR 81 mg twice daily (or reverse order). In the phase II/III double-blind study, PD patients with dyskinesia were randomized to ADS-5102 (210, 274, or 338 mg) or placebo for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Single ADS-5102 doses resulted in a slow initial rise in amantadine plasma concentration, with delayed time to maximum concentration (12-16 h). Amantadine plasma concentrations were higher in PD patients versus healthy volunteers. The steady-state profile of once-daily ADS-5102 was significantly different from that of twice-daily amantadine IR, such that the two formulations are not bioequivalent. PK modeling suggested the recommended daily ADS-5102 dosage (274 mg qhs) resulted in 1.4- to 2.0-fold higher amantadine plasma concentrations during the day versus amantadine IR.

CONCLUSIONS

ADS-5102 can be administered once-daily qhs to achieve high amantadine plasma concentrations in the morning and throughout the day, when symptoms of dyskinesia occur.

Practical Evaluation and Management of Insomnia in Parkinson's Disease: A Review

Background

Insomnia is one of the most common nonmotor features of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, there are few practical guidelines for providers on how to best evaluate and treat this problem.

Methods and Findings

This review was developed to provide clinicians with a pragmatic approach to assessing and managing insomnia in PD. Recommendations were based on literature review and expert opinion. We addressed the following topics in this review: prevalence of insomnia in PD, sleep-wake mechanisms, theoretical models of insomnia, risk factors, assessment, pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments. Insomnia treatment choices may be guided by PD severity, comorbidities, and patient preference. However, there is limited evidence supporting pharmacotherapy and nonpharmacologic treatments of insomnia in PD.

Conclusions

We provide a pragmatic algorithm for evaluating and treating insomnia in PD based on the literature and our clinical experience. We propose personalized insomnia treatment approaches based on age and other issues. Gaps in the existing literature and future directions in the treatment of insomnia in PD are also highlighted.