Tissue-agnostic drug approvals: how does this apply to patients with breast cancer?

Precision medicine has provided new perspectives in oncology, yielding research on the use of targeted therapies across different tumor types, regardless of their site of origin, a concept known as tissue-agnostic indication. Since 2017, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of three different agents for tumor-agnostic treatment: pembrolizumab (for patients with microsatellite instability or high tumor mutational burden) and larotrectinib and entrectinib (both for use in patients harboring tumors with NTRK fusions). Importantly, the genomic alterations targeted by these agents are uncommon or rare in breast cancer, and little information exists regarding their efficacy in advanced breast cancer. In this review, we discuss the prevalence of these targets in breast cancer, their detection methods, the clinical characteristics of patients whose tumors have these alterations, and available data regarding the efficacy of these agents in breast cancer.

Prospective Study Testing a Simplified Paclitaxel Premedication Regimen in Patients with Early Breast Cancer

Background

In early trials, hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to paclitaxel were common, thus prompting the administration of antihistamines and corticosteroids before every paclitaxel dose. We tested the safety of omitting corticosteroids after cycle 2 during the paclitaxel portion of the dose‐dense (DD) doxorubicin‐cyclophosphamide (AC)–paclitaxel regimen.

Patients, Materials, and Methods

In this prospective, single‐arm study, patients who completed four cycles of DD‐AC for stage I–III breast cancer received paclitaxel 175 mg/m² every 2 weeks for four cycles. Patients received a standard premedication protocol containing dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and a histamine H2 blocker prior to the first two paclitaxel cycles. Dexamethasone was omitted in cycles three and four if there were no HSRs in previous cycles. We estimated the rate of grade 3–4 HSRs.

Results

Among 127 patients enrolled, 125 received more than one dose of protocol therapy and are included in the analysis. Fourteen (11.2%; 90% confidence interval, 6.9%–20.0%) patients had any‐grade HSRs, for a total of 22 (4.5%; 3.1%–6.4%) HSRs over 486 paclitaxel cycles. Any‐grade HSRs occurred in 1.6% (0.3%–5.0%), 6.5% (3.3%–11.3%), 7.4% (3.9%–12.5%), and 2.6% (0.7%–6.6%) of patients after paclitaxel cycles 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Dexamethasone use was decreased by 92.8% in cycles 3 and 4. Only one patient experienced grade 3 HSR in cycles 3 or 4, for a rate of grade 3/4 HSR 0.4% (0.02%–2.0%) (1/237 paclitaxel infusions). That patient had grade 2 HSR during cycle 2, and the subsequent grade 3 event occurred despite usual dexamethasone premedication. A sensitivity analysis restricted to patients not known to have received dexamethasone in cycles 3 and 4 found that any‐grade HSRs occurred in 2.7% (3/111; 0.7%–6.8%) and 0.9% (1/109; 0.05%–4.3%) of patients in cycle 3 and 4, respectively.

Conclusion

Corticosteroid premedication can be safely omitted in cycles 3 and 4 of dose‐dense paclitaxel if HSRs are not observed during cycles 1 and 2.

Implications for Practice

Because of the potential for hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to paclitaxel, corticosteroids are routinely prescribed prior to each dose, on an indefinite basis. This prospective study, including 125 patients treated with 486 paclitaxel cycles, demonstrates that corticosteroids can be safely omitted in future cycles if HSRs did not occur during cycles 1 and 2 of paclitaxel and that this strategy reduces the use of corticosteroids in cycles 3 and 4 by 92.8% relative to current standard of care.

To avoid hypersensitivity reactions, corticosteroids are routinely prescribed before each dose of paclitaxel. This article reports the results of a study that focused on whether corticosteroids could be safely omitted in later cycles of treatment if reactions did not occur during earlier cycles.

Nivolumab in combination with cabozantinib for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a phase II and biomarker study

This single-arm phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib combined with nivolumab in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Biopsies at baseline and after cycle 1 were analyzed for tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), PD-L1, and whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing. Only 1/18 patients achieved a partial response (ORR 6%), and the trial was stopped early. Toxicity led to cabozantinib dose reduction in 50% of patients. One patient had a PD-L1-positive tumor, and three patients had TILs > 10%. The responding patient had a PD-L1-negative tumor with low tumor mutational burden but high TILs and enriched immune gene expression. High pretreatment levels of plasma immunosuppressive cytokines, chemokines, and immune checkpoint molecules were associated with rapid progression. Although this study did not meet its primary endpoint, immunostaining, genomic, and proteomic studies indicated a high degree of tumor immunosuppression in this mTNBC cohort.

Modeling clonal structure over narrow time frames via circulating tumor DNA in metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers minimally invasive means to repeatedly interrogate tumor genomes, providing opportunities to monitor clonal dynamics induced by metastasis and therapeutic selective pressures. In metastatic cancers, ctDNA profiling allows for simultaneous analysis of both local and distant sites of recurrence. Despite the promise of ctDNA sampling, its utility in real-time genetic monitoring remains largely unexplored.

METHODS

In this exploratory analysis, we characterize high-frequency ctDNA sample series collected over narrow time frames from seven patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, each undergoing treatment with Cabozantinib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (NCT01738438, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01738438 ). Applying orthogonal whole exome sequencing, ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing, and 396-gene targeted panel sequencing, we analyzed 42 plasma-derived ctDNA libraries, representing 4-8 samples per patient with 6-42 days between samples. Integrating tumor fraction, copy number, and somatic variant information, we model tumor clonal dynamics, predict neoantigens, and evaluate consistency of genomic information from orthogonal assays.

RESULTS

We measured considerable variation in ctDNA tumor faction in each patient, often conflicting with RECIST imaging response metrics. In orthogonal sequencing, we found high concordance between targeted panel and whole exome sequencing in both variant detection and variant allele frequency estimation (specificity = 95.5%, VAF correlation, r = 0.949), Copy number remained generally stable, despite resolution limitations posed by low tumor fraction. Through modeling, we inferred and tracked distinct clonal populations specific to each patient and built phylogenetic trees revealing alterations in hallmark breast cancer drivers, including TP53, PIK3CA, CDK4, and PTEN. Our modeling revealed varied responses to therapy, with some individuals displaying stable clonal profiles, while others showed signs of substantial expansion or reduction in prevalence, with characteristic alterations of varied literature annotation in relation to the study drug. Finally, we predicted and tracked neoantigen-producing alterations across time, exposing translationally relevant detection patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite technical challenges arising from low tumor content, metastatic ctDNA monitoring can aid our understanding of response and progression, while minimizing patient risk and discomfort. In this study, we demonstrate the potential for high-frequency monitoring of evolving genomic features, providing an important step toward scalable, translational genomics for clinical decision making.

Abstract PS4-25: Comprehensive genomic analysis reveals molecular correlates of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

Background: Genomic mechanisms associated with response to ICI in mTNBC are largely unknown. The aim of this work is to assess the genomic and immune profiles of mTNBC samples collected from patients (pts) treated with ICI. Methods: We identified 31 women with mTNBC treated with ICI (pembrolizumab, n=6, NCT02447003; atezolizumab, n=4, NCT01375842; nivolumab + cabozantinib, n = 6, NCT03316586; pembrolizumab + eribulin, n=8, NCT02513472; atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel, n=7, NCT01633970) who had tumor tissue or blood available for sequencing obtained before and after ICI. Clinical benefit (CB), here defined as any objective response or stable disease (SD) for > 24 weeks, was observed in 20 pts (65%). An extraordinary responder was defined as having CB ≥ 2 yrs; 5 pts were considered extraordinary responders (range 26-60months). Whole exome sequencing (WES) was done on each tumor and on germline DNA from blood (23 pts had successful WES performed on samples collected before ICI; 5 of these had WES on samples taken after disease progression). RNA sequencing (RNAseq) was successfully performed in 18 of the tumors with WES performed on samples before ICI; and 3 of these had RNAseq on samples taken after disease progression. 18 pts had tumors assessed by multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) panels encompassing CD4, CD8, PD-1, PD-L1, and cytokeratin on samples collected before ICI. WES, deep targeted panel and low coverage whole genome sequencing were performed on serially collected plasma samples from 22 pts to evaluate tumor fraction and specific mutations. The association between biomarkers and clinical benefit to ICI was assessed. Results: 21 of 31 pts (67%) had received ≥1 prior lines of systemic therapy in the metastatic setting before starting ICI. Among the most frequently mutated genes at baseline are: TP53 (57%); PIK3CA (18%); DNAH5, MYH8 (both 13%); KMT2C, AKT1, LAMA2 (all 9%). Pts with CB had a higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) than pts with no CB (p=0.018). Differential expression analysis of RNAseq data revealed an upregulation of several immune-related genes in pts with CB, indicating increased immune infiltration in that group. Gene set enrichment analysis of this expression data using hallmark and canonical pathway gene sets from MSigDB (nominal p-val < 0.05) showed that, compared to samples from pts without CB, extraordinary responders had elevated transcriptional signatures of several cancer-related pathways associated with cell survival, proliferation and metabolism, as well as genes associated with increased immune infiltration and upregulation of inflammatory response programs. The mIF showed that the tumor microenvironment (TME) of pts with CB were enriched in Cytokeratin-negative/PD-L1-positive cells compared to those without CB (p=0.014). Expression of CD4, CD8 and PD-1 was not significantly different between pts with and without CB. Genomic analysis of circulating tumor DNA, and tumor evolutionary analysis for pts with both pre- and post-ICI samples (acquired resistance) will be presented. Conclusions: Clinical benefit to ICI in mTNBC was associated with upregulation of immune-related pathways, enrichment of non-tumoral PD-L1-positive cells in TME, and high TMB.

Citation Format: Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Juliet Forman, Zachary T. Weber, Katherine Collier, Katrina Z. Kao, Edward T. Richardson, III, Tanya Keenan, Ofir Cohen, Michael P. Manos, Ryan C. Brennick, Patrick Ott, F. Steve Hodi, Deborah A. Dillon, Nancy U. Lin, Eliezer E. Van Allen, Scott Rodig, Eric P. Winer, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Catherine J. Wu, Daniel Stover, Nikhil Wagle, Sachet Shukla, Sara Tolaney. Comprehensive genomic analysis reveals molecular correlates of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-25.

Abstract PD9-08: Modeling clonal structure over narrow time frames via circulating tumor DNA in metastatic breast cancer

Introduction: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers the ability to repeatedly interrogate tumor genomic information, providing an opportunity for real-time monitoring of tumor genomic dynamics. In this study, we deeply analyzed multiple ctDNA samples collected over narrow time frames (days-to-weeks) from seven patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), a cancer type known to have high ctDNA content. Methods: Patients with mTNBC were enrolled in a clinical trial of multi-kinase inhibitor cabozantinib, providing uniform and targeted treatment, and samples were collected day 1, day 8, then every 21 to 42 days on study. ctDNA was extracted from each plasma sample and underwent ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing (ULP-WGS; average depth 0.1x; n=42 samples), deep targeted panel sequencing (TPS) of 402 cancer-related genes with unique molecular identifier indexing (depth 10,000x; n=42 samples), and samples with tumor fraction (TFx) >10% underwent whole exome sequencing (WES; depth 200x; n=31 samples), with whole blood germline sequencing of both TPS and WES for subsequent analyses. Somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) were identified from ULP-WGS and WES. PyClone with TPS was employed for clonal dynamic analyses. Predicted neoantigens were determined from WES using HLAthena. Results: A total of 42 total plasma samples from 7 patients (range 4-8 samples per patient) were collected at narrow time intervals, median 21 days (range 6 to 42 days) between samples. The median TFx across all samples was 18.1% (range 2.5% to 44.3%). TFx estimates were concordant when comparing orthogonal sequencing approaches (ULP-WGS, WES) and tumor fraction estimation algorithms (ichorCNA, FACETS). Despite all seven patients having ‘stable disease’ as best objective response, TFx dynamics were widely variable with TFx declining to lower limit of detection in three of seven patients. Of all samples, 31/42 (73.8%) had tumor fraction >10% and underwent WES; each patient had at least 3 samples that underwent both WES and TPS. There was strong agreement between TPS and WES: across all 31 shared samples, mutation recall in TPS versus WES (gold standard) was 95.5%. Variant allele frequency across all mutations detected in both TPS and WES was highly concordant (Pearson’s r=0.949). Clonal mutations were consistently detected across multiple samples within patients. When comparing genome-wide copy number from last to first available sample within each patient, copy number log ratios were largely stable within patients (union Pearson’s r=0.924) and there were not recurrent shifts in SCNAs across patients. Through statistical modeling of TPS data, we tracked distinct clonal populations for each patient over their sampling windows. Modeled clonal architecture in most patients revealed stable, polyclonal profiles, with important breast cancer driver alterations (e.g. TP53 and PIK3CA) recurrently presenting at high prevalence. Infrequently, we also detected emergence and expansion of clones over narrow time frames (weeks) containing acquired alterations poorly annotated in the breast cancer literature. We successfully predicted neoantigens from ctDNA WES at multiple time points in each patient, with evidence that patients acquired new mutations predicted to be ‘strong binder’ neoantigens over time on therapy. Conclusions: Analysis of serial ctDNA samples collected at narrow time intervals (days-to-weeks) provides unique insight into the dynamics of ctDNA. We demonstrate strong concordance across ctDNA sequencing appraoches. Evolving genomic features of tumor populations can be identified via ctDNA while on treatment, potentially providing real time insight for clinical decision-making.

Citation Format: Daniel G Stover, Katharine A Collier, David Tallman, Juliet Forman, Sachet Shukla, Sarah Asad, Justin Rhoades, Samuel Freeman, Mathew Cherian, Sagar Sardesai, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Carrie Cibulskis, Niall Lennon, Gavin Ha, Sara M Tolaney, Viktor A Adalsteinsson, Zachary Weber. Modeling clonal structure over narrow time frames via circulating tumor DNA in metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-08.

Genomic Characterization of de novo Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

In contrast to recurrence after initial diagnosis of stage I-III breast cancer [recurrent metastatic breast cancer (rMBC)], de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) represents a unique setting to elucidate metastatic drivers in the absence of treatment selection. We present the genomic landscape of dnMBC and association with overall survival (OS).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Targeted DNA sequencing (OncoPanel) was prospectively performed on either primary or metastatic tumors from 926 patients (212 dnMBC and 714 rMBC). Single-nucleotide variants, copy-number variations, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in treatment-naïve dnMBC primary tumors were compared with primary tumors in patients who ultimately developed rMBC, and correlated with OS across all dnMBC.

RESULTS

When comparing primary tumors by subtype, MYB amplification was enriched in triple-negative dnMBC versus rMBC (21.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.0005, q = 0.111). Mutations in KMTD2, SETD2, and PIK3CA were more prevalent, and TP53 and BRCA1 less prevalent, in primary HR⁺/HER2^- tumors of dnMBC versus rMBC, though not significant after multiple comparison adjustment. Alterations associated with shorter OS in dnMBC included TP53 (wild-type: 79.7 months; altered: 44.2 months; P = 0.008, q = 0.107), MYC (79.7 vs. 23.3 months; P = 0.0003, q = 0.011), and cell-cycle (122.7 vs. 54.9 months; P = 0.034, q = 0.245) pathway genes. High TMB correlated with better OS in triple-negative dnMBC (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Genomic differences between treatment-naïve dnMBC and primary tumors of patients who developed rMBC may provide insight into mechanisms underlying metastatic potential and differential therapeutic sensitivity in dnMBC. Alterations associated with poor OS in dnMBC highlight the need for novel approaches to overcome potential intrinsic resistance to current treatments.

Phase 2 study of buparlisib (BKM120), a pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for triple-negative breast cancer remain limited. Activation of the PI3K pathway via loss of PTEN and/or INPP4B is common. Buparlisib is an orally bioavailable, pan-class I PI3K inhibitor. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of buparlisib in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

METHODS

This was a single-arm phase 2 study enrolling patients with triple-negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients were treated with buparlisib at a starting dose of 100 mg daily. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit, defined as confirmed complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for ≥ 4 months, per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. A subset of patients underwent pre- and on-treatment tumor tissue biopsies for correlative studies.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled. Median number of cycles was 2 (range 1-10). The clinical benefit rate was 12% (6 patients, all SD ≥ 4 months). Median PFS was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.3). Median OS was 11.2 months (95% CI 6.2-25). The most frequent adverse events were fatigue (58% all grades, 8% grade 3), nausea (34% all grades, none grade 3), hyperglycemia (34% all grades, 4% grade 3), and anorexia (30% all grades, 2% grade 3). Eighteen percent of patients experienced depression (12% grade 1, 6% grade 2) and anxiety (10% grade 1, 8% grade 2). Alterations in PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN were present in 6/27 patients with available targeted DNA sequencing (MSK-IMPACT), 3 of whom achieved SD as best overall response though none with clinical benefit ≥ 4 months. Of five patients with paired baseline and on-treatment biopsies, reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) analysis demonstrated reduction of S6 phosphorylation in 2 of 3 patients who achieved SD, and in none of the patients with progressive disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Buparlisib was associated with prolonged SD in a very small subset of patients with triple-negative breast cancer; however, no confirmed objective responses were observed. Downmodulation of key nodes in the PI3K pathway was observed in patients who achieved SD. PI3K pathway inhibition alone may be insufficient as a therapeutic strategy for triple-negative breast cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01790932 . Registered on 13 February 2013; NCT01629615 . Registered on 27 June 2012.

Pembrolizumab in the preoperative setting of triple-negative breast cancer: safety and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

In 2019, the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab became the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for treatment in patients with breast cancer. The approval is restricted to patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) whose tumors are PD-L1 positive. There is a rationale to believe that using PD-1/L1 inhibitors in the early disease setting may be associated with even greater benefit than seen in the metastatic setting.

AREAS COVERED

We review the results of pembrolizumab studies in the metastatic setting as well as the rationale for using immunotherapy in the preoperative setting. We also present current data pembrolizumab in the treatment of breast cancer with focus on the early-stage setting and discuss areas of uncertainty.

EXPERT OPINION

The KEYNOTE-552 study showed, for the first time, that the addition of pembrolizumab to preoperative chemotherapy increases pathologic complete response rates. Event-free survival data are promising and longer follow-up is needed to determine whether the addition of pembrolizumab significantly improves long-term outcomes for patients with early-stage TNBC.

Effect of Eribulin With or Without Pembrolizumab on Progression-Free Survival for Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, ERBB2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Prior studies have shown that only a small proportion of patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) experience benefit from programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors given as monotherapy. There are data suggesting that activity may be greater with combination strategies.

Objective

To compare the efficacy of eribulin plus pembrolizumab vs eribulin alone in patients with HR-positive, ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative MBC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Multicenter phase 2 randomized clinical trial of patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative MBC who had received 2 or more lines of hormonal therapy and 0 to 2 lines of chemotherapy.

Interventions

Patients were randomized 1:1 to eribulin, 1.4 mg/m2 intravenously, on days 1 and 8 plus pembrolizumab, 200 mg/m2 intravenously, on day 1 of a 21-day cycle or eribulin alone. At time of progression, patients in the eribulin monotherapy arm could cross over and receive pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analyses assessed the association between PFS and PD-L1 status, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumor mutational burden (TMB), and genomic alterations.

Results

Eighty-eight patients started protocol therapy; the median (range) age was 57 (30-76) years, median (range) number of prior lines of chemotherapy was 1 (0-2), and median (range) number of prior lines of hormonal therapy was 2 (0-5). Median follow-up was 10.5 (95% CI, 0.4-22.8) months. Median PFS and ORR were not different between the 2 groups (PFS, 4.1 vs 4.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.50-1.26; P = .33; ORR, 27% vs 34%, respectively; P = .49). Fourteen patients started crossover treatment with pembrolizumab; 1 patient experienced stable disease. All-cause adverse events occurred in all patients (grade ≥3, 65%) including 2 treatment-related deaths in the combination group, both from immune-related colitis in the setting of sepsis, attributed to both drugs. The PD-L1 22C3 assay was performed on archival tumor samples in 65 patients: 24 (37%) had PD-L1-positive tumors. Analysis indicated that PD-L1 status, TILs, TMB, and genomic alterations were not associated with PFS.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial of patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative MBC, the addition of pembrolizumab to eribulin did not improve PFS, ORR, or OS compared with eribulin alone in either the intention-to-treat or PD-L1-positive populations. Further efforts to explore the benefits of adding checkpoint inhibition to chemotherapy among less heavily pretreated patients are needed.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03051659.

Identifying ERBB2 Activating Mutations in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Impact of Institute-Wide Genomic Testing and Enrollment in Matched Therapy Trials

PURPOSE

The yield of comprehensive genomic profiling in recruiting patients to molecular-based trials designed for small subgroups has not been fully evaluated. We evaluated the likelihood of enrollment in a clinical trial that required the identification of a specific genomic change based on our institute-wide genomic tumor profiling.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using genomic profiling from archived tissue samples derived from patients with metastatic breast cancer treated between 2011 and 2017, we assessed the impact of systematic genomic characterization on enrollment in an ongoing phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01670877). Our primary aim was to describe the proportion of patients with a qualifying ERBB2 mutation identified by our institutional genomic panel (OncoMap or OncoPanel) who enrolled in the trial. Secondary objectives included median time from testing result to trial registration, description of the spectrum of ERBB2 mutations, and survival. Associations were calculated using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 1,045 patients with metastatic breast cancer without ERBB2 amplification who had available genomic testing results. Of these, 42 patients were found to have ERBB2 mutation and 19 patients (1.8%) were eligible for the trial on the basis of the presence of an activating mutation, 18 of which were identified by OncoPanel testing. Fifty-eight percent of potentially eligible patients were approached, and 33.3% of eligible patients enrolled in the trial guided exclusively by OncoPanel testing.

CONCLUSION

More than one half of eligible patients were approached for trial participation and, significantly, one third of those were enrolled in NCT01670877. Our data illustrate the ability to enroll patients in trials of rare subsets in routine clinical practice and highlight the need for these broadly based approaches to effectively support the success of these studies.

Genomic profiling of breast cancer brain metastases reveals targetable alterations

2525

Background: Genomic characterization of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) has thus far been limited. The objective of this study was to describe the landscape of genomic alterations in patients (pts) with BCBMs. Methods: Targeted next-generation DNA sequencing of > 300 cancer-related genes (OncoPanel) was prospectively performed on primary and metastatic (met) tumors in 321 pts with a diagnosis of BCBM between August 2016 and April 2019 at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (table). Enrichment analysis of genomic alterations was performed using a two-sided Fisher exact test and differences in tumor mutation burden (TMB) between groups were assessed using two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. Multiple comparison correction was performed using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Results: All subtypes were represented in BCBM (25 HR+/HER2-; 24 HR+/HER2+; 27 HR-/HER2+; 18 TNBC; 5 unknown; n = 99) and extracranial (EC) samples: (96 HR+/HER2-; 32 HR+/HER2+; 22 HR-/HER2+; 41 TNBC; 31 unknown; n = 222). BCBMs were found most commonly to have mutations or copy number alterations in TP53, ERBB2, PIK3CA, GATA3, PTEN, ESR1, CDH1, BRCA2, ARID1A, BRCA1 (>5% frequency, table). Two pts acquired ERBB2 amplification (amp) between the matched primary breast sample and brain met. In pair-wise comparisons of BCBMs to unmatched primaries or EC mets, only ERBB2 amp was significantly enriched (table, † = adjusted p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in TMB between BCBM and EC mets (median 9.12 vs 7.26, p = 0.15). In contrast, TMB was significantly higher in BCBMs compared to unmatched primaries (median 9.12 vs 7.26, p=0.005). Conclusions: BCBMs display similar mutations and copy number alterations compared to primary tumors and EC mets in pts with BCBM. These data suggest that BCBMs contain actionable genomic alterations that are most often also reflected in EC disease. Alterations in ERBB2, PIK3CA/PTEN, and BRCA1/2 represent potentially targetable alterations in pts with BCBM. [Table: see text]

Avoiding Peg-Filgrastim Prophylaxis During the Paclitaxel Portion of the Dose-Dense Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide and Paclitaxel Regimen: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE

The use of growth factors adds considerable expense and some toxicity to adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy. We tested the feasibility and safety of omitting routine peg-filgrastim use during the paclitaxel portion of the dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, single-arm study in which patients 18 to 65 years of age who completed 4 cycles of dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide for stage I-III breast cancer received paclitaxel 175 mg/m² every 2 weeks. Peg-filgrastim was administered after paclitaxel only if patients had had febrile neutropenia in a prior cycle or at investigator discretion if patients had infections or treatment delays of > 1 week. Once a patient received peg-filgrastim, it was administered in all future cycles. The primary end point was the rate of paclitaxel completion within 7 weeks from cycle 1 day 1 to cycle 4 day 1. If ≥ 100 out of 125 patients completed 4 cycles of paclitaxel without dose delay, the regimen would be considered feasible.

RESULTS

The enrollment goal of 125 patients was met. Median age was 46 years (range, 21-65 years), and 112 patients (90% [95% CI, 83% to 94%]) completed dose-dense paclitaxel within 7 weeks. Omission of peg-filgrastim was not causally related to noncompletion of paclitaxel in any patients. The most common reasons for dose reduction or delays were nonhematologic. One patient experienced febrile neutropenia but was able to complete paclitaxel on time. Eight patients (6.4%) received peg-filgrastim during the trial. Overall, peg-filgrastim was administered in only 4.3% of paclitaxel cycles.

CONCLUSION

Omission of routine peg-filgrastim during dose-dense paclitaxel according to a prespecified algorithm seems to be safe and feasible and was associated with a 95.7% reduction in the use of peg-filgrastim relative to the current standard of care.

Abstract P3-09-10: A phase II study of nivolumab in combination with cabozantinib for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

Background: Patients (pts) with mTNBC have a poor prognosis, and new therapies are needed. Cabozantinib is a multikinase inhibitor that blocks VEGF receptor 2, reduces myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and increases T cell infiltration, suggesting it may enhance the activity of the anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade agent nivolumab. Here, we report the safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus cabozantinib in a phase II single-arm study in mTNBC pts.

Methods: Eligible pts had metastatic breast cancer that was estrogen and progesterone receptor &lt; 10% and HER2 negative, measurable disease, and received 0-3 prior lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting. Pts received nivolumab (480 mg intravenously on day 1, every 28 days) plus cabozantinib (40 mg daily by mouth). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Using the Simons “optimal” method, if ≥ 3/18 pts responded during the first stage, 17 more would be enrolled. If ≥ 7/35 responded, the null hypothesis (ORR=10%) would be rejected in favor of a 30% ORR. Predefined secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and toxicity. CBR was defined as the fraction of pts with any objective response or stable disease (SD) ≥ 24 weeks. Analyses associating PD-L1 expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), and genomic alterations (assessed by next generation sequencing on archival tissue) with outcomes were exploratory.

Results: From 12/15/2017 to 01/24/2019, 18 pts were enrolled into the first stage of the trial; one partial response was seen (ORR 5.6%; 95% CI: 0.3-29.4), and the study was closed to further accrual. The median age was 58y, all pts had ECOG PS 0, and 7 (38.9%) had liver metastases. The median number of prior cytotoxic therapies for mTNBC pts was 1 (range 0 to 3). Three pts had SD ≥24 weeks and two had progressive disease best response. The CBR was 22.2%. After a median follow up of 3.7 months, the median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI: 1.9-12.8), and the median OS was 6.9 months (95% CI: 3.4-NR). All-cause adverse events occurred in 100% of pts (G3-4, 78%) including elevated liver enzymes (any 50%; G3-4 16.7%), hand-foot syndrome (any 38.9%; G3-4 16.7%), fatigue (any 38.9%; G3-4 11.1%), and hypothyroidism (any 33.3%; no G3-4). Of the 9 pts with available genomic data, none had tumor mutational burden ≥ 10 mutations per megabase. Updated data with TIL, PD-L1, whole exome sequencing and RNA-sequencing results will be presented.

Conclusions: The combination of nivolumab plus cabozantinib was not associated with any unexpected adverse events, however, with an ORR of 5.6%, the study did not achieve its primary endpoint. Exploratory genomic and immunological correlative studies are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03316586.

Citation Format: Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Lorenzo Trippa, Tianyu Li, Tanya E Keenan, Grace Winship, Chelsea Andrews, Wafa Osmani, Beth Overmoyer, Eric P Winer, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Dan G Duda, Sara M Tolaney. A phase II study of nivolumab in combination with cabozantinib for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-10.

Tumor Mutational Burden and PTEN Alterations as Molecular Correlates of Response to PD-1/L1 Blockade in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Few patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). On the basis of immunotherapy response correlates in other cancers, we evaluated whether high tumor mutational burden (TMB) ≥10 nonsynonymous mutations/megabase and PTEN alterations, defined as nonsynonymous mutations or 1 or 2 copy deletions, were associated with clinical benefit to anti-PD-1/L1 therapy in mTNBC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We identified patients with mTNBC, who consented to targeted DNA sequencing and were treated with ICIs on clinical trials between April 2014 and January 2019 at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA). Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were correlated with tumor genomic features.

RESULTS

Sixty-two women received anti-PD-1/L1 inhibitors alone (23%) or combined with targeted therapy (19%) or chemotherapy (58%). High TMB (18%) was associated with significantly longer PFS (12.5 vs. 3.7 months; P = 0.04), while PTEN alterations (29%) were associated with significantly lower ORR (6% vs. 48%; P = 0.01), shorter PFS (2.3 vs. 6.1 months; P = 0.01), and shorter OS (9.7 vs. 20.5 months; P = 0.02). Multivariate analyses confirmed that these associations were independent of performance status, prior lines of therapy, therapy regimen, and visceral metastases. The survival associations were additionally independent of PD-L1 in patients with known PD-L1 and were not found in mTNBC cohorts treated with chemotherapy (n = 90) and non-ICI regimens (n = 169).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with mTNBC treated with anti-PD-1/L1 therapies, high TMB and PTEN alterations were associated with longer and shorter survival, respectively. These observations warrant validation in larger datasets.

A Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab in Combination With Palliative Radiotherapy for Hormone Receptor-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether combining pembrolizumab with palliative radiation therapy (RT) improves outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR⁺) metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had HR⁺/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative MBC; were candidates for RT to ≥ 1 bone, soft tissue, or lymph node lesion; and had ≥ 1 lesion outside the RT field. Patients received 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously 2 to 7 days prior to RT and on day 1 of repeating 21-day cycles. RT was delivered to a previously unirradiated area in 5 treatments each of 4 Gy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. The study used a 2-stage design: 8 women were enrolled into the first stage, and if at least 1 of 8 patients experienced an objective response, 19 more would be enrolled. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory endpoints included association of overall response rate with programmed death-ligand 1 status and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

RESULTS

Eight patients were enrolled in stage 1. The median age was 59 years, and the median prior lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease was 2. There were no objective responses, and the study was closed to further accrual. The median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (95% confidence interval, 0.4-2.1 months), and the median overall survival was 2.9 months (95% confidence interval, 0.9-3.6 months). All-cause adverse events occurred in 87.5% of patients, including just 1 grade 3 event (elevation of aspartate aminotransferase).

CONCLUSIONS

RT combined with pembrolizumab did not produce an objective response in patients with heavily pre-treated HR⁺ MBC. Future studies should consider alternative radiation dosing and fractionation in patients with less heavily pre-treated HR⁺ MBC.

Prevalence and mutational determinants of high tumor mutation burden in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

High tumor mutation burden (TMB) can benefit immunotherapy for multiple tumor types, but the prevalence of hypermutated breast cancer is not well described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, mutational patterns, and genomic profile of hypermutated breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used de-identified data from individuals with primary or metastatic breast cancer from six different publicly available genomic studies. The prevalence of hypermutated breast cancer was determined among 3969 patients' samples that underwent whole exome sequencing or gene panel sequencing. The samples were classified as having high TMB if they had ≥10 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb). An additional eight patients were identified from a Dana-Farber Cancer Institute cohort for inclusion in the hypermutated cohort. Among the patients with high TMB, the mutational patterns and genomic profiles were determined. A subset of patients was treated with regimens containing PD-1 inhibitors.

RESULTS

The median TMB was 2.63 mut/Mb. The median TMB significantly varied according to the tumor subtype (HR-/HER2- >HER2+ >HR+/HER2-, P < 0.05) and sample type (metastatic > primary, P = 2.2 × 10^-16). Hypermutated tumors were found in 198 patients (5%), with enrichment in metastatic versus primary tumors (8.4% versus 2.9%, P = 6.5 × 10^-14). APOBEC activity (59.2%), followed by mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd; 36.4%), were the most common mutational processes among hypermutated tumors. Three patients with hypermutated breast cancer-including two with a dominant APOBEC activity signature and one with a dominant MMRd signature-treated with pembrolizumab-based therapies derived an objective and durable response to therapy.

CONCLUSION

Hypermutation occurs in 5% of all breast cancers with enrichment in metastatic tumors. Different mutational signatures are present in this population with APOBEC activity being the most common dominant process. Preliminary data suggest that hypermutated breast cancers are more likely to benefit from PD-1 inhibitors.

Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction Following the Use of Different Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

If not promptly recognized, endocrine dysfunction can be life threatening. The incidence and risk of developing such adverse events (AEs) following the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) regimens are unknown.

Objective

To compare the incidence and risk of endocrine AEs following treatment with US Food and Drug Administration-approved ICI regimens.

Data Sources

A PubMed search through July 18, 2016, using the following keywords was performed: "ipilimumab," "MDX-010," "nivolumab," "BMS-963558," "pembrolizumab," "MK-3475," "atezolizumab," "MPDL3280A," and "phase."

Study Selection

Thirty-eight randomized clinical trials evaluating the usage of these ICIs for treatment of advanced solid tumors were identified, resulting in a total of 7551 patients who were eligible for a meta-analysis. Regimens were categorized by class into monotherapy with a PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) inhibitor, a CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4) inhibitor, or a PD-L1 (programmed cell death 1 ligand 1) inhibitor, and combination therapy with PD-1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The data were extracted by 1 primary reviewer (R.B.-S.) and then independently reviewed by 2 secondary reviewers (W.T.B. and A.C.G.-C.) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Inferences on the incidence of AEs were made using log-odds random effects models.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Incidence of all-grade hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, hypophysitis, primary adrenal insufficiency, and insulin-deficient diabetes.

Results

Overall, 38 randomized clinical trials comprising 7551 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The incidence of both hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism was highest in patients receiving combination therapy. Patients on the combination regimen were significantly more likely to experience hypothyroidism (odds ratio [OR], 3.81; 95% CI, 2.10-6.91, P < .001) and hyperthyroidism (OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 2.05-8.90; P = .001) than patients on ipilimumab. Compared with patients on ipilimumab, those on PD-1 inhibitors had a higher risk of developing hypothyroidism (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.17-3.05; P = .03). The risk of hyperthyroidism, but not hypothyroidism, was significantly greater with PD-1 than with PD-L1 inhibitors (OR, 5.36; 95% CI, 2.04-14.08; P = .002). While patients who received PD-1 inhibitors were significantly less likely to experience hypophysitis than those receiving ipilimumab (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.18-0.49; P < .001), those who received combination therapy were significantly more likely to develop it (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.39-3.60; P = .001). For primary adrenal insufficiency and insulin-deficient diabetes no statistical inferences were made due to the smaller number of events.

Conclusions and Relevance

Our study provides more precise data on the incidence of endocrine dysfunctions among patients receiving ICI regimens. Patients on combination therapy are at increased risk of thyroid dysfunction and hypophysitis.

Evidence to date: talazoparib in the treatment of breast cancer

Approximately 5-10% of all patients diagnosed with breast cancer have germline BRCA1/2 mutations, which make their disease more susceptible to DNA-damaging agents and a new class of drugs known as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Talazoparib is a new PARP inhibitor that has been recently approved for use in patients with metastatic breast cancer with germline BRCA mutations after a phase III trial showed superior progression-free survival when compared to standard chemotherapy. In this review, we analyze the development of talazoparib as well as its safety profile and the potential role of the combination therapy with standard cytotoxic drugs and with novel therapies.

Utilization of tumor genomics in clinical practice: an international survey among ASCO members

Aim: To identify patterns of use and barriers to tumor genomic testing among oncologists. Methods: We surveyed American Society of Clinical Oncology physician members about their use of genomic testing. Results: Among 11,900 members surveyed, a total of 1000 responded to the survey (participation rate, 8.4%). A total of 75% of the respondents included in the analysis reported ordering tests for at least 1–10% of their patients. Practice setting (academic vs community) was only a determinant in the ordering frequency in North America. Regardless of location, academic oncologists were more likely to prescribe medicine in the context of a clinical trial. Access to clinical trials and costs associated with testing were the barriers identified worldwide. Conclusion: There is substantial variation in the use of genomic tools according to region and practice setting; yet, the barriers are similar worldwide.

Genomic landscape of de novo stage IV breast cancer

1022

Background: Genomic profiling of primary and recurrent metastatic breast cancer (rMBC) has revealed potential resistance mechanisms to therapy. In contrast, de novo stage IV breast cancer (DNIV) represents an opportunity to elucidate metastatic drivers in the absence of treatment selection. Methods: Targeted NGS (Oncopanel, OP) using multiplexed copy number variation (CNV) and mutation (mut) detection across the full coding regions of 300 genes and selected intronic regions of 35 genes was performed on either primary or metastatic samples collected in patients (pts) with DNIV or rMBC. Mut/CNV in primary and metastatic tumors were compared per subtype between DNIV and rMBC using Fisher´s exact test (significant p<0.05). FDR were computed ( q<0.25). Results: Between 8/2013-9/2016, of 929 pts who underwent OP testing 212 presented with DNIV; 136 HR+/HER2- (64%); 35 HR+/HER2+ (17%); 25 TNBC (12%); 16 HR-/HER2+ (8%). In 168 (79%) pts, the primary was tested; 44 had a metastatic site tested. Comparison of primary HR+/HER2- tumors showed that DNIV pts were more likely to harbor mut in CDKN1B, SETD2 and PMS2 and less likely to have TP53 mut than rMBC (Table). Metastases in HR+/HER2- DNIV (n=29) had higher mut in CDH1, PTCH1 and CTNNB1 and fewer CCND1 amplification (amp) than rMBC (n=121), albeit these findings lost significance after FDR correction. DNIV primary TNBC (n=19) was significantly enriched for CIITA mut (26% vs. 0%; q=0.046) and MYB amp (21% vs. 0%, q=0.098) compared to rMBC (n=101). TP53 mut, amp in RAD21, MYC, MYB, PTK2 and EGFR, and deletions in CDKN2A/2B and MAP2K4 significantly predicted poorer overall survival in DNIV. Conclusions: DNIV primary and metastatic tumors have distinct genomic profiles compared to rMBC. Alterations in genes involved in epigenetic modulation ( KMT2D, SETD2) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition ( CDH1, PTCH1, CTNNB1) are more prevalent in HR+/HER2- DNIV. DNIV TNBC is enriched for CIITA mut, described to promote immune escape via reduced MHC class II expression. If validated, these findings may provide insight into mechanisms underlying metastatic potential. [Table: see text]

Nimbus: A phase II study of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in metastatic hypermutated HER2-negative breast cancer

TPS1115

Background: A previous study from our group showed that approximately 9% of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is hypermutated, defined as a tumor mutational burden (TMB) ≥10 Mutations/Megabase (Mut/Mb). The aim of this study is to evaluate if patients with hypermutated HER2-negative MBC benefit from the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study assessing the efficacy of nivolumab 3 mg/Kg intravenously (IV) every 14 days plus Ipilimumab 1 mg/Kg IV every 6 weeks in subjects with hypermutated metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer. Patients with measurable HER2-negative MBC, TMB ≥10 Mut/Mb assessed by a cancer-gene panel evaluating > 300 genes and performed in a CLIA-certified laboratory, and 0-3 prior lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting are eligible. The primary objective is overall response rate according to RECIST 1.1. Secondary objectives include the safety and tolerability of the combination, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The study will follow a two-stage design. In the first stage 14 patients will be enrolled. If there is at least one patient with objective response, accrual will continue to the second stage where an additional 16 patients will be enrolled. If there are at least 4 patients with an objective response among the 30 patients, the regimen will be considered worthy of further study. If the true response rate is 5%, the chance the regimen is declared worthy of further study is less than 5%. If the true response rate is 25%, the chance that the regimen is declared worthy of further study is > 90%. Tumor biopsies, peripheral blood, and stool collection are mandatory and will be obtained at baseline, on treatment (end of cycle 1), and at disease progression and will be assessed for potential biomarkers of treatment response. The trial was activated in February 2019, and accrual should be completed in 18 months. Clinical trial information: NCT03789110.

Avoiding peg-filgrastim (Peg-F) prophylaxis during the paclitaxel (T) portion of the dose-dense (DD) doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC)-T regimen: A prospective study

517

Background: Use of growth factors (GF) adds considerable expense and some toxicity to adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy. We tested the feasibility and safety of omitting routine GF use during the T portion of DD AC-T. Methods: This is a prospective, single-arm study in which patients (pts) who completed 4 cycles of DD-AC proceeded to DD-T 175 mg/m2 every two weeks (wks) without routine GF (NCT02698891). Key inclusion: age≤ 65, ECOG PS≤1, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1500/mm3, and no febrile neutropenia (FN) during DD-AC. Criteria to treat for T included ANC ≥1000/mm3. Peg-F was given only if pts had FN in a prior cycle, or at investigator discretion if infection or treatment delay > 1 wk. Once Peg-F was given, pts received it in all future cycles. The primary endpoint was the rate of T completion ≤ 7 wks from cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) to C4D1. Secondary endpoints included total use of Peg-F, rates of hematologic toxicity and FN, reasons for dose modification or hold. If ≥85% of pts completed T on time, the regimen would be considered feasible. If the true on-time completion rate is 75%, the chance the regimen would be declared infeasible is 91%, and if it is 85% the chance that the regimen is falsely declared infeasible is 10% (power = 0.899). ≥100/125 pts had to complete T on time for the regimen to be deemed successful. Results: Among 127 pts enrolled, 125 received ≥1 dose of protocol therapy and are included in the analysis. Median age at registration was 46 (range 21-65). Median C1D1 ANC was 7500/mm3 (range 1500-20500). 112 (90%) (95% CI 83-94%) pts completed DD-T ≤ 7 wks, and 3 (2%) completed within > 7 wks (2 due to neutropenia); 10 (8%) did not complete all cycles of T. Omission of Peg-F was not causally related to non-completion of T in any pts. The most common reasons for dose reduction or delays were non-hematologic. One pt had FN but was able to complete T on time. Eight (6.4%) pts received Peg-F during the trial. Conclusions: Omission of routine GF use during DD-T according to a pre-specified algorithm appears safe, feasible, and was associated with a 95.7% reduction in use of Peg-F, relative to the current standard of care. Additional analyses including cost implications are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02698891.

Randomized phase II study of eribulin mesylate (E) with or without pembrolizumab (P) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

1004

Background: Studies of checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy show only modest activity in HR+ MBC. We report data from the first randomized study comparing E plus P versus E alone in HR+/HER2- MBC. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had HR+/HER2- MBC, ≥2 lines of hormonal therapies and 0-2 lines of chemotherapy for MBC. Pts were randomized 1:1 to E 1.4mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on d1 and d8 with P 200 mg/m2 IV on d1 of a 21-day cycle (Arm A) or E alone (Arm B). At time of progression, pts in arm B could crossover and receive P alone. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints were: objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analyses assessed the association between PFS and PD-L1 status, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and genomic alterations by next generation sequencing on archival tissue. Results: 88 pts initiated protocol therapy; the median age was 58, median prior lines of chemotherapy 1, prior lines of hormonal therapy 2. Median follow-up was 6.3 months. Median PFS and ORR were not different between Arms A and B (PFS 4.1 vs 4.2 months p = 0.38; ORR 25% and 34% respectively (p = 0.49). 14 patients initiated crossover treatment with pembrolizumab; 1 patient experienced a PR (ORR 7%). All-cause AEs occurred in 100% of pts (G3-4, 54.6%) including 2 treatment related deaths on Arm A, both from known AEs attributed to both drugs. PD-L1 assay was performed in 65 pts: 24 (36.9%) had PD-L1 positive ( > 1% with 22C3, centrally tested) tumors. PD-L1 status, TILs, NLR, TMB, and genomic alterations were not associated with PFS (Table). Updated data, including OS and genomic results, will be presented. Conclusions: Among pts with HR+/HER2- MBC, the combination of E and P was not associated with longer PFS than E alone in the ITT or PD-L1+ population, though the PD-L1+ subgroup had very limited power to assess P benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT03051659. [Table: see text]