Cancer patients and oncology nursing: Perspectives of oncology nurses in Turkey

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Burnout and exhaustion is a frequent problem in oncology nursing. The aim of this study is to evaluate the aspects of oncology nurses about their profession in order to enhance the standards of oncology nursing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This survey was conducted with 70 oncology nurses working at Hacettepe University Oncology Hospital. Data were collected between January-April 2012. Each participant provided a study form comprising questions about sociodemographic information; about difficulties, positive aspects and required skills for oncology nursing; and questions evaluating level of participation and clinical perception of oncology nursing.

RESULTS

Mean age of nurses was 29.9 ± 5.7 years. More than half of the participants were married (51.4%) and 30% had at least one child. Percent of nurses working in oncology for their entire work life was 75.8%. Most frequently expressed difficulties were exhaustion (58.6%), coping with the psychological problems of the patients (25.7%), and frequent deaths (24.3%); positive aspects were satisfaction (37.1%), changing the perceptions about life (30%), and empathy (14.3%); and required skills were patience (60%), empathy (57.1%), and experience (50%). For difficulties of oncology nursing, 28.3% of difficulties could be attributed to job-related factors, 30.3% to patient-related factors, and 77% of difficulties to individual factors. The independent predictors of participation level of the nurses were self-thoughts of skills and positive aspects of oncology nursing.

CONCLUSION

According to the findings of this study, nurses declared that working with cancer patients increase burnout, they are insufficient in managing work stress and giving psychological care to patients, but their job satisfaction, clinical skills and awareness regarding priorities of life has increased.

Increasing performance of a hospital-based cancer registry: Hacettepe University hospitals experience

PURPOSE

High-quality hospital-based cancer registry systems are the key elements of a healthy population-based cancer data. The purpose of this study was to present a recent history of establishing a valuable and reliable hospital- based cancer registry in a university hospital in Turkey, and the data gathered by this system in the last 9 years.

METHODS

This study included the cancer registry records of Hacettepe University Hospitals between 1-Jan-2003, and 31-Dec-2011. The study cohort included data of 39351 cancer patients and the cancer registry system was based on active data acquisition method.

RESULTS

Most frequent departments of reference were Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, General Surgery, Urology, and Pediatrics. The annual number of records gradually increased from 2675 in 2003 to 5152 in 2011. The 5 cancer types most frequency seen in adults were lung (15.5%), prostate (13.5%), stomach (6.6%), bladder (6.2%), and colon (5.8%) in men; and breast (32.7%), ovary (6.4%), uterine corpus (6.2%), uterine cervix (5.6%), and thyroid (5.0%) in women. Childhood cancers were classified according to the International Classification of Childhood Cancers, 3rd Edition (ICCC-3), and the most frequent 5 cancer types in children were tumors of the central nervous system (20.1%), lymphomas (14.6%), leukemia (14.1%), retinoblastoma (9.4%), and tumors of the sympathetic nervous system (7.7%).

CONCLUSION

Active data acquisition from departments that deal with oncologic patients in a hospital is the precise method for establishing a high-quality cancer registry system that is able to resemble the general population. Hospital- based cancer registry systems also provide highly critical information for planning, monitoring, and measuring the cancer-related services, research, and education.

A randomized, multicenter phase III trial of bevacizumab plus capecitabine as maintenance treatment after initial treatment with bevacizumab plus XELOX in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer

474

Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies, second to breast cancer in women and third to lung cancer and prostate cancer in men. The aim of this study in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was to achieve a better progression-free survival (PFS) and less risk of toxicity by administrating bevacizumab (BEV) + capecitabine + oxaliplatin (XELOX) for 6 cycles, stop oxaliplatin and go with maintenance therapy (BEV + capecitabine) until progression.

Methods: BEV (7.5 mg/kg) + XELOX (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 bid d1–14 + oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d1 q3w) were administered until progression (Arm A) or 6 cycles of BEV + XELOX followed by BEV + capecitabine were administered until progression (Arm B). PFS was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. A sample size of 118 patients (pts) was calculated to achieve 80% power to detect an increase of 1.5 months in median PFS between Arm A (9.5 months) and Arm B (11.0 months) with a standard deviation of 3.9 months and significance level of 0.05 using a 10% drop-out rate.

Results: A total of 122 pts were randomized. No significant differences were found in demographic characteristics between the two arms. Median treatment period was 6.1 (range 0.7–13.4) and 6.8 (range 0.7–12.4) months in Arms A and B, respectively. Interim analysis showed no statistically significant differences in median PFS and ORR between arms (see table). Tolerability was also acceptable in both arms with grade 3/4 diarrhoea in 7.7% vs. 8.2%, weakness in 15.2% vs. 8.4%, hand-foot syndrome in 6.3% vs. 9.4%, and neuropathy in 2.8% vs. 4.6% of pts in Arms A and B, respectively.

Conclusions: BEV + capecitabine as maintenance therapy following induction BEV + XELOX is non-inferior to continuous BEV + XELOX until progression. While this study is ongoing, these interim findings suggest that maintenance therapy with BEV + capecitabine is an appropriate option following induction BEV + XELOX in pts with mCRC.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Socio-demographic parameters in screening for breast cancer: Lessons from a population-'based women's Health Project held in a province in Turkey

PURPOSE

to inform healthy women about breast cancer and screen them, as well as to look for any relationship between demographic and clinical findings and breast cancer.

METHODS

thirty-five health teams were created prior to the study. The teams were primarily trained for breast examination and for screening methods to detect breast cancer.

RESULTS

a total of 77,934 subjects were evaluated. Clinical breast examination (CBE) was performed in 66% (n=51,706) of the participants. The characteristics of the subjects in the examined group were similar to those in the group refusing examination. The percentage of the subjects who declined examination was 2-fold higher in the ≥ 60 year age group compared to younger women. A breast mass was detected in 2,838 (6%) subjects who had undergone breast examination. Lower educational level and urban dwellers showed higher incidence of suspicious mass in CBE. Fifty-eight women were diagnosed with breast cancer. The cumulative incidence of breast cancer was 7.5/10.000 for all of the study population and 10.1/10.000 for women with CBE.

CONCLUSION

elderly subjects, those living in rural areas and women with low educational and lower socio-economic levels should be convinced to undergo screening for breast cancer.