An assessment of dose intensity of the TNT approach on outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer

258

Background: Patients with clinical stage II or III locally advanced rectal cancer may be treated with the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach; chemotherapy with 4 mths of FOLFOX followed by chemoradiation (chemo/XRT) with capecitabine for 5 wks administered before surgery. We hypothesized that full dose intensity is not necessary for treatment benefit. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with newly diagnosed rectal cancer recommended to receive TNT by the multidisciplinary (multiD) colorectal cancer tumor board at the University of Colorado Cancer Center (UCCC). The primary objective was to evaluate dose intensity of TNT and its impact on response assessed by biopsy and/or imaging (MRI). Results: Between January 31, 2016 and January 31, 2019, 80 patients were recommended the TNT approach for cancer management by the multiD team. Of those, 48 completed their neoadjuvant treatment at UCCC and were included in the analysis. The average age was 55 years (range 23-80) and 61% were male. Thirty-one patients had an ECOG of 0 and 17 had an ECOG of 1. Overall responses were 44% complete response (CR, n = 21), 15% near complete response (nCR, n = 7), 35% partial response (PR, n = 17), and 6% no response (NR, n = 3). See Table for responses seen by dose intensity for chemotherapy. Two patients did not receive their full planned XRT course, and 9 patients had their capecitabine doses held/decreased during chemoradiation. Conclusions: This single center retrospective analysis of patients receiving the TNT approach for rectal cancer provides data supporting that achieving full dose intensity is not necessary to achieve treatment benefit.

[Table: see text]

Association of Cancer Immunotherapy With Acute Macular Neuroretinopathy and Diffuse Retinal Venulitis

Importance

Checkpoint inhibition in cancer immunotherapy related to T-cell-driven mechanisms of action associated with acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN) and diffuse retinal venulitis, an adverse event not previously described, is reported here.

Objective

To describe 2 patients who developed ophthalmologic events after treatment with the programmed death 1 axis inhibitor, atezolizumab.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Retrospective review of 2 patients treated with atezolizumab for metastatic breast cancer and colon cancer, respectively, who presented with AMN and diffuse retinal venulitis conducted at 2 tertiary medical centers.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Multimodal imaging including near infrared, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescein angiography were used to characterize retinal vascular abnormalities.

Results

Based on optical coherence tomography and multimodal imaging findings, the clinical diagnosis of AMN associated with diffuse retinal venulitis was made in these 2 patients receiving atezolizumab.

Conclusions and Relevance

While only 2 cases of patients receiving the programmed death ligand 1 inhibitor atezolizumab who experienced AMN and diffuse retinal venulitis are described here, these findings suggest that patients receiving programmed death 1 axis inhibitor therapies may need to be monitored for unexpected immune-related ocular toxicity including abnormalities of the microvasculature and large retinal vessels. Further studies might investigate the potential mechanisms of retinal vascular changes associated with these therapies.

Multicenter Study of the Real-World Use of Ceftaroline versus Vancomycin for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

The objective of this study was to determine if real-world ceftaroline treatment in adults hospitalized for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) is associated with decreased infection-related length of stay (LOSinf) compared to that with vancomycin. This was a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study from 2012 to 2017. Cox proportional hazard regression, propensity score matching, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to determine the independent effect of treatment group on LOSinf The patients were adults hospitalized with ABSSSI and treated with ceftaroline or vancomycin for ≥72 h within 120 h of diagnosis at four academic medical centers and two community hospitals in Arizona, Florida, Michigan, and West Virginia. A total of 724 patients were included (325 ceftaroline treated and 399 vancomycin treated). In general, ceftaroline-treated patients had characteristics consistent with a higher risk of poor outcomes. The unadjusted median LOSinf values were 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3 to 7) days and 6 (IQR, 4 to 8) days in the vancomycin and ceftaroline groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.866; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.747 to 1.002). The Cox proportional hazard model (adjusted HR [aHR], 0.891; 95% CI, 0.748 to 1.060), propensity score-matched (aHR, 0.955; 95% CI, 0.786 to 1.159), and IPTW (aHR, 0.918; 95% CI, 0.793 to 1.063) analyses demonstrated no significant difference in LOSinf between groups. Patients treated with ceftaroline were significantly more likely to meet criteria for discharge readiness at day 3 in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Although discharge readiness at day 3 was higher in ceftaroline-treated patients, LOSinf values were similar between treatment groups. Clinical and nonclinical factors were associated with LOSinf.

Treatment delays during FOLFOX chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis

Background

FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) is the most commonly used chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of colorectal cancer. FOLFOX is administered in 14-day cycles, though toxicities frequently lead to unplanned delays. We report the incidence of unplanned delays among patients receiving FOLFOX and describe the reasons for delays.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. Patients were treated at one of two tertiary cancer centers between January 2012 and April 2016. Cycles 2-6 were assessed for delays, and treatments were considered delayed when the interval from prior treatment was >18 days. Reasons for unplanned delays were categorized based on review of clinical records.

Results

We identified 214 patients receiving FOLFOX as standard-of-care therapy. The median age was 59 years, and 55% were female. Of 961 evaluable treatment cycles, 124 (13%) had unplanned delays, and 92 of 214 patients (43%) had one or more unplanned delays in cycles 2-6. Cytopenias (neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia) were the most common cause of unplanned delays, affecting 34% of patients and accounting for 74 of 124 unplanned delays (60%).

Conclusions

Delays are common during FOLFOX chemotherapy, with 43% of patients having at least one unplanned delay prior to completing cycle 6. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the leading causes of unplanned delays. Our findings justify the development of systematic approaches for preventing unplanned delays, such as standardized laboratory treatment criteria and/or proactive dose adjustment strategies.

Abstract 4720: Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase inhibitor AZD0156 in combination with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan in preclinical models of colorectal cancer

Background: AZD0156 is an oral inhibitor of ATM, a serine threonine kinase that plays a key role in DNA damage response associated with DNA double strand breaks. Topoisomerase-I inhibitors like irinotecan induce single-strand DNA breaks, which are converted to double-strand breaks during DNA replication. Thus the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan is a rational combination for clinical use. Irinotecan is used clinically to treat a variety of malignancies, including colorectal cancer (CRC), usually in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) as FOLFIRI. An ongoing phase 1 clinical trial is evaluating AZD0156 in combination with single-agent irinotecan and FOLFIRI in patients with refractory cancers (NCT02588105). The purpose of this study is to evaluate AZD0156 in combination with irinotecan and 5FU in preclinical models of CRC to help inform clinical use.

Methods: Anti-proliferative effects of single-agent AZD0156 and combination therapy with SN38 (active metabolite of irinotecan) and 5FU were evaluated in CRC cell lines using the Cell-Titer Glo assay. Immunoblotting and cell cycle analysis were performed to determine the mechanism of enhanced combination effects. Four CRC patient derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with AZD0156, irinotecan, and 5FU alone and in combination for assessment of tumor growth inhibition (TGI).

Results: An enhanced antiproliferative effect was observed with the combination treatment over either single agent. A more significant synergistic effect was demonstrated with the combination of AZD0156 and SN38 as compared with the combination of AZD0156 and 5FU. Cell cycle data demonstrated enhanced cell cycle arrest with combination therapy as compared to single agents. Immunoblotting results suggest a decrease in phosphorylated gamma-H2AX in cell lines treated with combination therapies. Increased TGI was observed in CRC PDX models treated with the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan as compared to single-agent therapy in 3 of 4 models. There was not a significant change in TGI with the addition of 5FU for triplet therapy in the majority of models.

Conclusions: The combination of AZD0156 with irinotecan is synergistic in in vitro models and is associated with increased TGI in CRC PDX in vivo models. The addition of 5FU to AZD0156 and irinotecan did not result in increased TGI as compared to doublet therapy in CRC PDX models, though did not decrease the AZD0156/irinotecan combination effect. An ongoing clinical trial is evaluating this combination in patients with cancers refractory to standard treatments (NCT02588105).

Citation Format: S. Lindsey Davis, Marina I. Schlaepfer, Stacey M. Bagby, Sarah J. Hartman, Betelehem W. Yacob, Tonia Tse, Dennis M. Simmons, Jennifer R. Diamond, Christopher H. Lieu, Alexis D. Leal, Elaine B. Cadogan, Gareth D. Hughes, Stephen T. Durant, Wells A. Messersmith, Todd M. Pitts. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase inhibitor AZD0156 in combination with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan in preclinical models of colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4720.

Abstract 1315: Combination of Wee1 inhibition with targeted and standard chemotherapy in preclinical models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is the fourth leading cause of cancer death and has a 5-year survival rate of less than 7%. The poor prognosis associated with PDA is related in part to a lack of screening tests to promote early detection and ineffective systemic targeted therapies. Adavosertib (AZD1775, MK1775) is a selective Wee1 inhibitor with promising preclinical activity in PDA and synergy with cytotoxic chemotherapy in other cancer types. Wee1 is a tyrosine kinase that activates in the G2M cell cycle checkpoint in response to DNA damage. Inhibition of Wee1 with adavosertib prevents the phosphorylation of CDC2, thus allowing unrepaired DNA to enter mitosis and ultimately succumb to mitotic catastrophe. The purpose of this study was to investigate adavosertib in combination with standard chemotherapy and other targeted agents in preclinical models of PDA.

Methods: Athymic nude mice were implanted with PDA PDX models on the right and left flanks. When the average tumor volume reached 100-300 mm3, mice were randomized into one of the following treatments: vehicle, adavosertib, irinotecan, navitoclax, capecitabine, adavosertib + irinotecan, or adavosertib + navitoclax, adavosertib + capecitabine. Tumor volume was calculated using the following equation: volume = (length × width) × 0.52. Four pancreatic cancer cell lines were plated in 96-well plates and Cell Titer-Glo proliferation assays were performed to determine the most effective combination doses of irinotecan, 5FU, or navitoclax with adavosertib in vitro. Combination effects were analyzed using CalcuSyn software. The most effective doses within each cell line were selected and used for Caspase 3/7 apoptosis assays and cell cycle analyses by flow cytometry. Western blots were performed to evaluate changes in downstream effectors.

Results: In vivo, the combination of adavosertib with either irinotecan or navitoclax resulted in decreased tumor growth compared to the respective single agents. The combination of adavosertib with irinotecan, 5FU, or navitoclax in vitro resulted in greater antiproliferative effects in all cell lines, and the several combinations were synergistic in all cell lines as determined by CI values less than 1. Navitoclax increased apoptosis in several cell lines both as a single agent and was enhanced in combination with adavosertib. Irinotecan proved to be more cell cycle dependent and significantly altered the cell cycle in all cell lines. Irinotecan increased phospho-CDC2 and decreased PHH3, while adavosertib increased gamma-H2AX as a single agent and in combination.

Conclusions: The combination of adavosertib with either irinotecan, 5FU, or navitoclax in vivo decreased tumor growth and had enhanced antiproliferative effects in vitro. These data support future studies with adavosertib in combination with standard therapies or navitoclax to treat PDA.

Citation Format: Sarah J. Hartman, Stacey M. Bagby, Betelehem W. Yacob, Dennis M. Simmons, Tonia E. Tse, Christopher H. Lieu, S. Lindsey Davis, Alexis D. Leal, Jennifer R. Diamond, Wells A. Messersmith, Todd M. Pitts. Combination of Wee1 inhibition with targeted and standard chemotherapy in preclinical models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1315.

Phase I Study of the Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) Inhibitor Navoximod (GDC-0919) Administered with PD-L1 Inhibitor (Atezolizumab) in Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

IDO1 induces immune suppression in T cells through l-tryptophan (Trp) depletion and kynurenine (Kyn) accumulation in the local tumor microenvironment, suppressing effector T cells and hyperactivating regulatory T cells (Treg). Navoximod is an investigational small-molecule inhibitor of IDO1. This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of navoximod in combination with atezolizumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study consisted of a 3+3 dose-escalation stage (n = 66) and a tumor-specific expansion stage (n = 92). Navoximod was given orally every 12 hours continuously for 21 consecutive days of each cycle with the exception of cycle 1, where navoximod administration started on day -1 to characterize pharmacokinetics. Atezolizumab was administered by intravenous infusion 1,200 mg every 3 weeks on day 1 of each cycle.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 157) received navoximod at 6 dose levels (50-1,000 mg) in combination with atezolizumab. The maximum administered dose was 1,000 mg twice daily; the MTD was not reached. Navoximod demonstrated a linear pharmacokinetic profile, and plasma Kyn generally decreased with increasing doses of navoximod. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (22%), rash (22%), and chromaturia (20%). Activity was observed at all dose levels in various tumor types (melanoma, pancreatic, prostate, ovarian, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, cervical, neural sheath, non-small cell lung cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial bladder cancer): 6 (9%) dose-escalation patients achieved partial response, and 10 (11%) expansion patients achieved partial response or complete response.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of navoximod and atezolizumab demonstrated acceptable safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics for patients with advanced cancer. Although activity was observed, there was no clear evidence of benefit from adding navoximod to atezolizumab.

High incidence of advanced stage cancer and prolonged rectal bleeding history before diagnosis in young-onset patients with colorectal cancer

3576

Background: In contrast to the older population, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in younger patients (aged < 50 years) has been increasing in the last three decades. Younger patients tend to present with more advanced disease, thought to be in part related to lack of routine screening colonoscopies. The goal of this study was to examine characteristics of young-onset CRC and potentially identify factors that may aid in earlier diagnosis and treatment. Methods: We collected data for patients available through the University of Colorado Cancer Center Cancer Registry. Inclusion criteria included: 1) Diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer between the years 2012-2018 and 2) age at diagnosis of less than 50 years. Pertinent data including baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, family history, pathology, molecular testing, staging, and treatment were collected. Results: 211 patients with young-onset CRC were available for review. Mean age at diagnosis was 42.4 years and 55.5% were males. A total of 42.1% had rectal cancer and a majority of the colon cancer diagnoses had left-sided tumors (66%). Regarding clinical presentation, 52.2% presented with rectal bleeding prior to diagnosis. Of those who presented with rectal bleeding, the average time from the onset of bleeding to diagnosis was 271.17 days. 42.9% of young-onset CRC were stage IV at the time of initial diagnosis. Evaluation of the pathology specimens showed that 89.6% were adenocarcinomas and 63.5% were grade 2 or higher. At diagnosis, the mean BMI was 26.6 and the mean CEA was 135.5. A total of 72.5% of young-onset patients had a positive family history of any cancer. KRAS or NRAS mutations were present in 49.6% of patients, BRAF V600E mutations were present in 3.8%, and 10.8% were MSI-H. Conclusions: Prolonged rectal bleeding history prior to diagnosis was noted in a significant proportion of young-onset patients with colorectal cancer. Patients and primary care physicians should be made aware of this finding in order to facilitate timely referral for colonoscopy which may lead to earlier diagnosis, less advanced disease at diagnosis, and improved outcomes.

Patients with metastatic breast cancer enrolled in phase I clinical trials: Clinical outcomes and cohort trends

1099

Background: Phase I clinical trials have traditionally enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors and many providers perceive the likelihood of clinical benefit as low. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes for patients with metastatic breast cancer enrolled on Phase I clinical trials and explore differences in outcomes for patients enrolled in all-comer versus breast cancer-specific cohorts. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with metastatic breast cancer enrolled in Phase I clinical trials at the University of Colorado Cancer Center from 2012-2018. We included trials with Phase I and/or Phase Ib in the title. Studies or cohorts enrolling patients with ≥ 3 tumor types were considered all-comer and those with enrollment restricted to breast cancer or a breast cancer subtype were considered breast cancer-specific. Results: A total of 208 patients were enrolled in Phase I clinical trials, 168 in breast cancer-specific cohorts and 40 in all-comer trials. Patients on average were 56.9 years old (range 31-79), 98.6% (205/208) female, 1.4% (3/208) male, 57.2% ER+/Her2-, 30.1% ER-/Her2- and 11.1% Her2+. Patients received on average 2.1(range 0-10) prior lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Patients enrolled on Phase I clinical trials remained on study without progression on average for 138 days (CI 95%, 112.64 to 163.91). Patients enrolled on breast cancer-specific studies remained on study for 152 days (CI 95%, 120.66 to 182.56) compared to 82 days (CI 95%, 59.43 to 105.13) for those enrolled on all-comer trials, p< 0.05. Patients went off study for disease progression (83.17%), adverse events (7.69%), and other (9.14%), including withdrawal of consent. Conclusions: Patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with multiple lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting enrolled in Phase I clinical trials received clinical benefit from treatment that is favorable compared to historical controls of late-line chemotherapy. The majority of patients were treated on breast cancer-specific cohorts consistent with trends in Phase I trial design including more tumor specific cohorts.

Biomarkers to predict immune-related adverse events with checkpoint inhibitors

131

Background: Immune-related adverse events (IRAE) occur commonly with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for the treatment of cancer, although the specific event and severity can vary widely. Little is known regarding factors that may predict which patients will develop an IRAE. The goal of this study is to identify blood biomarkers predictive of IRAE associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Methods: Blood samples collected from patients with melanoma prior to receiving therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors were obtained from the University of Colorado Skin Cancer Biorepository. Testing for a panel of autoantibodies and cytokines (ANA, CCP 3.1, IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IP-10, MCP-1, TNF alpha, IFN alpha 2, IFN gamma) in serum samples from patients who had at least one documented IRAE was performed by Exsera BioLabs. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate biomarker levels in relation to type, grade, and number of adverse events. Results: Pre-treatment samples from 45 patients were evaluated. Median age was 55; 26 were male and 19 were female. The most common IRAEs were colitis (n = 22), thyroid dysfunction (n = 21), and dermatitis (n = 20). Most IRAEs were grade 2 in severity, and the majority of patients (n = 36) experienced more than 1 IRAE. TNF alpha was elevated in 60% of patient samples, while IFN alpha 2 was elevated in 44%. Borderline ANA was detected in 27% of samples and ANA was positive in 11%. No samples had elevation of IL-2. Between 9% and 18% of samples had elevation of the other immune markers tested (IFN gamma, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, and CCP 3.1). Elevation of TNF alpha and IFN alpha 2 were associated with higher grades of IRAEs. No associations between immune markers and the number or type of adverse events in an individual patient were noted. Results from 15 patients who did not have a documented IRAE on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy are currently pending to confirm these findings are unique to patients developing IRAE. Conclusions: This preliminary data suggests that baseline elevations of TNF alpha and IFN alpha 2 may predict development of IRAEs with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Results from samples from patients who did not develop an IRAE on therapy will be reported at the meeting.

QIM19-130: Quality Improvement Project to Standardize a Prehabilitation Pathway for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

Background: At our institution, the standard treatment recommendation for esophageal cancer patients with stage IB–IIIB disease is for neoadjuvant chemoradiation per the CROSS regimen prior to surgery. This regimen can be difficult for patients to tolerate, and they may be unable to receive full dose therapy without treatment dose reductions and delays. Methods: We conducted a quality improvement (QI) project, STRENGTH (Seeking to Reactivate Esophageal and Gastric Treatment Health), to implement supportive care interventions in the prehabilitation phase of neoadjuvant treatment. Our QI program included a standardized chemotherapy order template with supportive care interventions implemented at specific time points. Following implementation of the STRENGTH pathway, a retrospective QI analysis assessed an equal number of patients in the pre-STRENGTH and STRENGTH group for chemotherapy and radiation therapy dose intensities, as well as treatment outcomes. Results: During the pre-STRENGTH period, patients received an average of 5 chemotherapy treatments (range, 2–6), with an average relative dose intensity of 91.8% for carboplatin and 86.7% for paclitaxel. During the STRENGTH period, patients received an average of 6 (range, 5–8) chemotherapy treatments, with an average relative dose intensity of 111.4% for carboplatin and 112.9% for paclitaxel. In the pre-STRENGTH group, one patient did not complete their planned radiation dose due to nausea, vomiting, and dehydration. All patients in the STRENGTH group received their planned radiation dose. In the STRENGTH group, there is a trend of improved pathologic response, longer progression-free survival, and shortened time to surgery. Conclusion: Implementation of the STRENGTH pathway improved chemotherapy dose intensity, with potentially improved oncologic outcomes in the STRENGTH group. We plan to further optimize the STRENGTH program with implementation of standardized dose reduction and delay protocols for both chemotherapy and radiation, and assess the effects of STRENGTH interventions on patient quality of life.

Characterization of immune responses to anti-PD-1 mono and combination immunotherapy in hematopoietic humanized mice implanted with tumor xenografts

Background

The success of agents that reverse T-cell inhibitory signals, such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies, has reinvigorated cancer immunotherapy research. However, since only a minority of patients respond to single-agent therapies, methods to test the potential anti-tumor activity of rational combination therapies are still needed. Conventional murine xenograft models have been hampered by their immune-compromised status; thus, we developed a hematopoietic humanized mouse model, hu-CB-BRGS, and used it to study anti-tumor human immune responses to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line and patient-derived colorectal cancer (CRC) xenografts (PDX).

Methods

BALB/c-Rag2^nullIl2rγ^nullSIRPα^NOD (BRGS) pups were humanized through transplantation of cord blood (CB)-derived CD34+ cells. Mice were evaluated for human chimerism in the blood and assigned into experimental untreated or nivolumab groups based on chimerism. TNBC cell lines or tumor tissue from established CRC PDX models were implanted into both flanks of humanized mice and treatments ensued once tumors reached a volume of ~150mm³. Tumors were measured twice weekly. At end of study, immune organs and tumors were collected for immunological assessment.

Results

Humanized PDX models were successfully established with a high frequency of tumor engraftment. Humanized mice treated with anti-PD-1 exhibited increased anti-tumor human T-cell responses coupled with decreased Treg and myeloid populations that correlated with tumor growth inhibition. Combination therapies with anti-PD-1 treatment in TNBC-bearing mice reduced tumor growth in multi-drug cohorts. Finally, as observed in human colorectal patients, anti-PD-1 therapy had a strong response to a microsatellite-high CRC PDX that correlated with a higher number of human CD8+ IFNγ+ T cells in the tumor.

Conclusion

Hu-CB-BRGS mice represent an in vivo model to study immune checkpoint blockade to human tumors. The human immune system in the mice is inherently suppressed, similar to a tumor microenvironment, and thus allows growth of human tumors. However, the suppression can be released by anti-PD-1 therapies and inhibit tumor growth of some tumors. The model offers ample access to lymph and tumor cells for in-depth immunological analysis. The tumor growth inhibition correlates with increased CD8 IFNγ+ tumor infiltrating T cells. These hu-CB-BRGS mice provide a relevant preclinical animal model to facilitate prioritization of hypothesis-driven combination immunotherapies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-019-0518-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on R0 resection rate for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreas cancer

370

Background: Management for borderline resectable pancreas cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreas cancer (LAPC) is controversial. Multiagent chemotherapy (CT) followed by SBRT may allow for tumor downstaging and the ability to perform an R0 resection. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated BRPC and LAPC patients (pts) treated on our multidisciplinary treatment pathway. Pts underwent 2-3 months of CT. Pts without systemic progression received five fractions of SBRT, delivered every other day, to a dose of 30-33 Gy. After restaging, pts underwent surgery if resectable. Overall survival (OS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and local progression free survival (LPFS) were estimated and compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Results: We identified 80 pts with BRPC (65) or LAPC (15) treated with neoadjuvant CT + SBRT between 2011-2017. Median follow up was 20 months. CT primarily included FOLFIRINOX (65%) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (30%). Of pts completing CT + SBRT, 67 (84%) went to surgery and 53 (79%) of those pts underwent definitive surgery including seven LAPC patients. The remaining 14 pts underwent palliative or exploratory surgery due to intraoperative metastases (43%) or vascular involvement (57%). Of pts undergoing definitive surgery, 51 had R0 resection (96%) and 5 (9%) had a complete pathologic response (PR) to CT + SBRT. The R0 resection rate of the cohort was 64%. OS was 24.5 months. Pts with a complete or marked (14%) PR had significantly better OS than those with a moderate (40%) PR (41.3 vs 30 months, p = 0.04) and pts unable to undergo definitive surgery (18.2 months, p < 0.001). Zero of 11 pts who had a marked or complete PR had local progression, significant compared to those with moderate PR (p = 0.012). DMFS between these two groups was not statistically significantly different. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant CT + SBRT are associated with favorable PR rates and R0 resection rates. Marked or complete PR was associated with improved LPFS and OS compared to moderate PR and pts who did not undergo definitive surgery. DMFS was not significantly different between complete and marked PR compared to those with moderate PR.

Impact of multidisciplinary management in the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NET)

629

Background: The incidence and prevalence of NETs is increasing and diagnosis and pathologic evaluation of NETs is complex. Given the new advances in local and systemic therapies, multidisciplinary management models have been suggested to assist in treatment decisions. However, scientific data showing definite change in management with multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) review is lacking. We aim to address this need in this study. Methods: 113 GI-NET patients from 2012-18 were reviewed from a dedicated MDC where patients are seen simultaneously by multiple subspecialties, and data on patient characteristics, radiology, tumor pathology and treatment strategies were collected. Change in diagnosis was defined as any change in radiographic or pathologic findings that resulted in a change in the tumor type, grade, site or stage of cancer. Change in management was defined as any recommended change in treatment approach for NETs compared to the prior treatment plan. For patients who did not have a prior treatment plan or were seen directly at MDC, a change of management was considered as yes only if there was a change in diagnosis post MDC. Results: The mean age of patients evaluated was 61, with locally advanced or metastatic disease seen in 81% of patients. Small bowel and pancreatic NETs were the most common primaries (36% each). Significant proportion of NETs were well-differentiated (72%) with < 2 mitosis/10 HPF (47.3%) and Ki-67 of < 3% (36%). Patients were referred to MDC at an average of 2.5 years from diagnosis, with 23% having the MDC as their first visit. 40% had prior resection of primary, 25% were on somatostatin analogues (SSAs) previously and 9% of patients had received prior liver directed therapy (LDT). A significant proportion of patients had change in diagnosis post MDC evaluation: change in site (7%), stage of disease (7%), tumor type (3.5%) and grade (0.1%). A change in management was recommended in 50% of patients, with SSAs recommended in 43.8%, surgery in 25.4% and LDT in 17.5% of the patients. Conclusions: The use of a dedicated MDC to manage NETs had a substantial impact in change in management in a significant percentage of patients evaluated. MDC care for patients diagnosed with NET is recommended for optimal management.

A phase Ib dose escalation study of vantictumab (VAN) in combination with nab-paclitaxel (Nab-P) and gemcitabine (G) in patients with previously untreated stage IV pancreatic cancer

249

Background: Vantictumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits Wnt pathway signaling through binding FZD1, 2, 5, 7, and 8 receptors. A phase Ib study of VAN in combination with Nab-P and G was performed in patients with untreated stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients received VAN at escalating doses (3-7 mg/kg) in combination with standard dosing of Nab-P and G according to a 3+3 design. Due to fragility fractures occurring in this and other related clinical trials, dosing on an every 2 week schedule in cohorts 1 and 2 was transitioned to every 4 week dosing for cohorts 3 through 5. In these later cohorts, a minimum of six patients were treated at each dose level and additional criteria for maximum tolerated dose (MTD) integrating bone safety parameters were added. The bone safety plan was also revised for these cohorts. Sequential dosing of VAN followed by Nab-P and G was explored in cohort 5. Results: Thirty-one patients (52% male, 48% female) were enrolled and treated in 5 dosing cohorts. Median age was 66. Most common study-treatment related adverse events were nausea (68%) and fatigue (52%). One dose limiting toxicity (DLT) event occurred in the study population—grade 3 dehydration in 1 of 9 patients in cohort 4 (5 mg/kg q4w). Fragility fractures attributed to VAN occurred in two patients in cohort 2 (7 mg/kg q2w). Once the dosing schedule was revised to every 4 weeks, the maximum administered VAN dose was 5 mg/kg. No fragility fractures attributed to VAN occurred in these cohorts; pathologic fracture not attributed to VAN was documented in 2 patients. The study was terminated due to lack of an acceptable therapeutic index. Partial response was documented in 13 patients (42%) and stable disease in 11 (36%). Conclusions: The MTD of VAN plus Nab-P and G was not determined, but the maximum administered dose (MAD) of VAN, 7 mg/kg every 2 weeks, was considered unsafe related to bone toxicity, a known effect of WNT inhibition. After the study was revised, the MAD was 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, with no protocol-specified bone toxicity observed (n = 16). Clinical trial information: NCT02005315.

Impact of radiation dose during neoadjuvant chemoradiation on postoperative complications in esophageal (EC) and gastroesophageal junction cancers (GEJC)

119

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by resection is standard of care for operable stage II-III EC and GEJC; however, it can be associated with significant risk of postoperative complications (POC). The CROSS study group reported no increase in POC severity with nCRT using 41.4 Gy compared to surgery alone as defined by the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). We applied the CCI metric to evaluate the impact of nCRT radiation dose of < 50 Gy vs. ≥ 50 Gy on POC rates and compared to the CROSS rates. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 82 pts (2004-2016) with EC or GEJC treated with nCRT followed by resection at our institution. 29 (35%) pts were treated with < 50 Gy (range 39.6-46.8 Gy) and 53 (65%) were treated with ≥ 50 Gy (range 50.0-52.5 Gy) delivered using IMRT/VMAT (41%), 3D-CRT (46%), or tomotherapy IMRT (12%). Concurrent chemotherapy were carboplatin/paclitaxel (59%), cisplatin/5-FU (17%), or other (24%). Resection was performed by Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (67%), esophagogastrectomy (14%), or trans-hiatal approach (11%). POC within 30 days were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale and CCI scores were computed and compared between the two dose groups and with the CROSS nCRT group. Results: CCI scores and complication rates between our < 50 Gy and ≥ 50 Gy groups were not significantly different. Assuming a normal distribution of the CROSS CCI scores, there was no significant difference in CCI scores between the CROSS study nCRT, < 50 Gy, or ≥ 50 Gy groups. Rates of pulmonary complications were greater in the CROSS study. Conclusions: In highly selected EC and GEJC pts, definitive nCRT radiation doses do not appear to increase POC rates. Thus, 50 Gy can likely be delivered without increasing toxicity while also achieving a definitive dose for pts not able or willing to undergo subsequent surgery. [Table: see text]

Phase Ib Results of the Rational Combination of Selumetinib and Cyclosporin A in Advanced Solid Tumors with an Expansion Cohort in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

MEK inhibition is of interest in cancer drug development, but clinical activity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been limited. Preclinical studies demonstrated Wnt pathway overexpression in KRAS-mutant cell lines resistant to the MEK inhibitor, selumetinib. The combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A, a noncanonical Wnt pathway modulator, demonstrated antitumor activity in mCRC patient-derived xenografts. To translate these results, we conducted a NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-approved multicenter phase I/IB trial (NCT02188264) of the combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A. Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with the combination of oral selumetinib and cyclosporin A in the dose escalation phase, followed by an expansion cohort of irinotecan and oxaliplatin-refractory mCRC. The expansion cohort utilized a single-agent selumetinib "run-in" to evaluate FZD2 biomarker upregulation and KRAS-WT and KRAS-MT stratification to identify any potential predictors of efficacy. Twenty and 19 patients were enrolled in dose escalation and expansion phases, respectively. The most common adverse events and grade 3/4 toxicities were rash, hypertension, and edema. Three dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 hypertension, rash, and increased creatinine) were reported. The MTD was selumetinib 75 mg twice daily and cyclosporin A 2 mg/kg twice daily on a 28-day cycle. KRAS stratification did not identify any differences in response between KRAS-WT and KRAS-MT cancers. Two partial responses, 18 stable disease, and 10 progressive disease responses were observed. Combination selumetinib and cyclosporin A is well tolerated, with evidence of activity in mCRC. Future strategies for concept development include identifying better predictors of efficacy and improved Wnt pathway modulation.Significance: These findings translate preclinical studies combining selumetinib and cyclosporin into a phase I first-in-human clinical trial of such a combination in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Cancer Res; 78(18); 5398-407. ©2018 AACR.

A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Linsitinib (OSI-906), a Small-Molecule Dual Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor/Insulin Receptor Kinase Inhibitor, in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Cancer

Lessons Learned.

The maximum tolerated dose of the combination of linsitinib and irinotecan is linsitinib 450 mg daily on days 1–3 every 7 days and irinotecan 125 mg/m² days 1 and 8 of a 21‐day cycle.

The adverse effects associated with the combination are not significantly increased beyond what is expected of each drug as a single agent.

Multiple negative trials of insulin‐like growth factor‐1 receptor inhibitors performed in unselected patient populations led to the early discontinuation of linistinib development and this trial.

Earlier integration of assessment of potential predictive biomarkers into clinical trials, as was planned in this study, is vital to the development of targeted therapies in oncology.

Background.

This phase I dose‐escalation study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination of irinotecan and insulin‐like growth factor‐1 receptor (IGF‐1R) inhibitor linsitinib in patients with advanced cancer refractory to standard therapy.

Methods.

Dose escalation in three specified dose levels was performed according to a standard 3 + 3 design. Dose levels were as follows: (a) linsitinib 400 mg and irinotecan 100 mg/m², (b) linsitinib 450 mg and irinotecan 100 mg/m², and (c) linsitinib 450 mg and irinotecan 125 mg/m². Linisitinib was administered once daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17, and irinotecan on days 1 and 8. Assessment of a candidate predictive biomarker was planned in all patients, with further evaluation in an expansion cohort of advanced colorectal cancer.

Results.

A total of 17 patients were treated, with 1 patient in both cohort 2 and 3 experiencing dose‐limiting toxicity. Linsitinib 450 mg and irinotecan 125 mg/m² was the maximum tolerated dose. Sixteen (94%) patients experienced at least one treatment‐related adverse event. Neutropenia was the only grade >3 toxicity (4%). No significant hyperglycemia or QT interval prolongation was noted. No objective responses were observed; 47% (n = 8) had stable disease with median duration of 5.25 months.

Conclusion.

Although the combination was determined safe, the study was halted due to termination of linsitinib development, and biomarker testing was not performed.

Immune and autoimmune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy

The recent development of monoclonal antibodies that disinhibit the immune system from recognizing and attacking tumor cells has revolutionized the treatment of cancer. Among these agents are drugs that specifically block cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) signaling, called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). While these agents are generally well tolerated, ICI therapy can lead to loss of self-tolerance and the development of autoimmunity, manifesting as immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Although potentially linked to increased antitumor responses, the morbidity associated with IRAEs can be significant and in rare circumstances, fatal. Virtually any organ can be affected and the patients present with a broad range of signs and symptoms. Moreover, ICIs have varying IRAEs and have distinct toxicity profiles based on their mechanism of action. Fortunately, most of the IRAEs can be managed with immunosuppression and supportive care, but contingent on early recognition and prompt treatment. With increasing advances in drug development, including combination ICI therapy, these agents are becoming one of the most prescribed oncology drugs and clinicians should be knowledgeable about the recognition and management of IRAEs.

Antitumor activity of the aurora a selective kinase inhibitor, alisertib, against preclinical models of colorectal cancer

Background

The Aurora kinases are a family of serine/threonine kinases comprised of Aurora A, B, and C which execute critical steps in mitotic and meiotic progression. Alisertib (MLN8237) is an investigational Aurora A selective inhibitor that has demonstrated activity against a wide variety of tumor types in vitro and in vivo, including CRC.

Results

CRC cell lines demonstrated varying sensitivity to alisertib with IC₅₀ values ranging from 0.06 to > 5 umol/L. Following exposure to alisertib we observed a decrease in pAurora A, B and C in four CRC cell lines. We also observed an increase in p53 and p21 in a sensitive p53 wildtype cell line in contrast to the p53 mutant cell line or the resistant cell lines. The addition of alisertib to standard CRC treatments demonstrated improvement over single agent arms; however, the benefit was largely less than additive, but not antagonistic.

Methods

Forty-seven CRC cell lines were exposed to alisertib and IC₅₀s were calculated. Twenty-one PDX models were treated with alisertib and the Tumor Growth Inhibition Index was assessed. Additionally, 5 KRAS wildtype and mutant PDX models were treated with alisertib as single agent or in combination with cetuximab or irinotecan, respectively.

Conclusion

Alisertib demonstrated anti-proliferative effects against CRC cell lines and PDX models. Our data suggest that the addition of alisertib to standard therapies in colorectal cancer if pursued clinically, will require further investigation of patient selection strategies and these combinations may facilitate future clinical studies.

Abstract A083: A phase Ib study of the combination of MLN0128 (dual TORC1/2 inhibitor) and MLN8237 (Aurora A inhibitor, alisertib) in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background: MLN0128 is an oral inhibitor of mTOR kinase and mTORC1/2 signaling. Alisertib is an oral inhibitor of Aurora A kinase. Senescence and upregulation of genes in the PI3K/AKT/mTor pathway have been observed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient-derived xenograft models treated with alisertib, with greater tumor growth inhibition demonstrated in combination with MLN0128 as compared to each agent alone. An investigator-initiated trial was developed to evaluate the combination of MLN0128 and alisertib in patients with advanced solid tumors, followed by an expansion cohort in metastatic TNBC and other selected cancers. The goals of this ongoing study are to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of the combination. Results of dose escalation are presented here. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy were treated orally at escalating doses with the combination of MLN0128 daily on a continuous schedule and alisertib twice daily (BID) on days 1-7 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalation was conducted according to a standard 3+3 design. Key eligibility criteria included HgbA1c &lt;7%, fasting serum glucose &lt;130mg/dL and fasting triglycerides &lt;300mg/dL, normal cardiac function, no condition with potential to cause excessive daytime sleepiness (including chronic hypoxia) and no risk of malabsorption of oral medications. PK assessments were performed at various time points after single-agent and combination dosing. Results: A total of 16 patients with refractory cancers were enrolled in dose escalation. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in dose level 1 (MLN0128 1mg/alisertib 30mg) or dose level 2 (2mg/30mg). At the third dose level (2mg/40mg) 2 of 7 patients experienced a DLT (grade 3 fatigue/confusion and grade 2 GERD/nausea leading to study discontinuation). In an alternate dose level cohort evaluating MLN0128 3mg and alisertib 30mg, 2 of 2 patients experienced a DLT of grade 3 fatigue. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination was determined to be MLN0128 2mg daily and alisertib 30mg BID. Most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included alopecia, diarrhea, fatigue and rash in 19% each and nausea in 31% of patients. Most common Grade 3 AEs included fatigue (19%) and decreased neutrophil count (31%). Dose modification was required in 56% of patients, most often due to neutropenia. Median time on study was 3 cycles (range 1-15) at data cutoff. Best response of stable disease was observed in 5 patients (31%), with prolonged stable disease noted in a patient with ER+/HER2- breast cancer (15 cycles) and a patient with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (10 cycles). PK assessments indicate no significant drug interaction between agents. Cmax was 24.7 (± 13.6) ng/mL for MLN0128 and 1049 (±363) ng/mL for alisertib at combination MTD doses. MLN0128 AUC was 128.2 (±72.7) ng/mLxhr and alisertib AUC0-8 was 6119 (±2331) ng/mlxhr at these doses. Conclusions: MLN0128 2mg daily on a continuous schedule and alisertib 30mg BID days 1-7 of a 21-day cycle is the MTD of the drug combination. An expansion cohort in patients with TNBC and other selected cancers is currently enrolling at this dose. Functional imaging and serial tumor biopsies are being integrated into this cohort to assess the pharmacodynamic interactions of the combination.

Citation Format: S. Lindsey Davis, Elaine T. Lam, Bradley R. Corr, Cindy L. O'Bryant, Ashley Glode, Nichole Adler, Todd M. Pitts, John J. Tentler, Anna Capasso, Kyrie Dailey, Natalie J. Serkova, Colin D. Weekes, Daniel L. Gustafson, Christopher H. Lieu, Wells A. Messersmith, Stephen Leong, S. Gail Eckhardt, Jennifer R. Diamond. A phase Ib study of the combination of MLN0128 (dual TORC1/2 inhibitor) and MLN8237 (Aurora A inhibitor, alisertib) in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A083.

The impact of young adult colorectal cancer: incidence and trends in Colorado

Aim: Far less is known about colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in individuals under the age of 50. This study examined CRC incidence in order to better understand the changing CRC population. Methods: This study analyzed 39,525 CRC cases from the Colorado Central Cancer Registry from 1992 through 2013. Age-adjusted incidence, observed and relative 5-year survival, and estimated annual percentage change was analyzed. Results: Age-adjusted rates averaging 1.7% per year were observed in the under-50 population, while falling on average 4.3% per year (p < 0.05) in the over-50 population. Average-adjusted incidence rose in males under 50 by 2.7% per year (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The absolute incidence of CRC continues to fall in Colorado, however incidence is rising in individuals under 50, particularly males.

Abstract CT063: Phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of INCB054828 in patients (pts) with advanced, metastatic, or surgically unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with inadequate response to prior therapy

Background: Dysregulation of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling by FGFR translocations and activating mutations is implicated in many cancers, including CCA. FGFR2 translocations are the most common FGFR alterations, which occur in ~13% of pts with intrahepatic CCA and involve a variety of fusion partners/breakpoints. INCB054828 is a novel, orally available, selective inhibitor of FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 tyrosine kinase activities (AACR 2015; Abstract 771).

Methods: This phase 2, open-label trial will evaluate INCB054828 monotherapy in pts with advanced/metastatic or surgically unresectable CCA (Table; NCT02924376). Pts will be prescreened centrally for FGF/FGFR status and enrolled in the following cohorts prior to start of treatment: FGFR2 translocations (Cohort A); other FGF/FGFR alterations (Cohort B); no FGF/FGFR alterations (Cohort C; negative control for effects of FGF/FGFR alterations on objective response rate [ORR]). Pts must be aged ≥18 years, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, disease progression after ≥1 prior systemic therapy, and no prior use of selective FGFR inhibitors. Pts will self-administer INCB054828 orally at a starting dose of 13.5 mg once-daily on a 21-day cycle (2 weeks on; 1 week off); treatment will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint will be ORR (complete or partial response per independent radiologic review committee using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1) in pts with FGFR2 translocations (Cohort A). Secondary endpoints will include ORR in pts positive or negative for any FGF/FGFR alterations and duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety (all cohorts). The study is currently open for enrollment (estimated primary completion date, April, 2018).

Study DesignPrescreen for FGF/FGFR Status• Adults with metastatic/surgically unresectable cholangiocarcinoma with disease progression after ≥1 previous systemic treatment- FGFR2 translocations → cohort A (n~60)- Other FGF/FGFR alterations → cohort B (n~20)- No FGF/FGFR alterations → cohort C (n~20)Screen for eligibility criteria and patient characteristics• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2• Adequate hepatic function (total bilirubin ≤1.5 × upper limit of normal [ULN; ≤2.5 × ULN for Gilbert syndrome or disease involving liver]; aminotransferases &lt;2.5 × ULN [&lt;5 × ULN with liver metastases])• Adequate renal function (creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min; serum phosphate &gt;institutional ULN; serum calcium &gt;institutional normal range; potassium &gt;institutional lower limit of normal)• Life expectancy ≥12 weeksEnroll and initiate INCB054828 treatment• Oral once daily dosing: 21-day (2-weeks-on/1-week-off) cycleStart response assessment after cycle 2• Stable disease/partial or complete response → continue treatment with restaging after cycle 4; imaging assessments increase to every 3 cycles after cycle 4• Disease progression → discontinue treatment; safety and survival follow-up

Citation Format: Mitesh J. Borad, S. Lindsey Davis, Maeve A. Lowery, Ekaterine Asatiani, Christine F. Lihou, Huiling Zhen, Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa. Phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of INCB054828 in patients (pts) with advanced, metastatic, or surgically unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with inadequate response to prior therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT063. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT063

Abstract IA20: Challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned in the bench-to-bedside translation of xenopatient studies

Progress in oncology drug development has been hampered by a lack of preclinical models that reliably predict clinical activity of novel compounds in cancer patients. This is thought to be largely due to the inability of cell culture and cell line xenograft models to faithfully recapitulate the complex genetic and histologic heterogeneity of tumors. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, the topic of this meeting, have been shown to be biologically stable when passaged in mice in terms of global gene expression patterns, mutational status, drug responsiveness, and tumor architecture, thus providing an opportunity for more efficient and effective preclinical drug development. Potential applications include initial drug activity screening, biomarker development, assessment of combination strategies, and more recently, testing of immunotherapy strategies in humanized PDX models. With escalating concerns over heterogeneity between primary and metastatic sites and within the tumor itself, PDX models may also provide a platform for studying the evolution of heterogeneity, particularly within the context of drug resistance mechanisms. Despite all of the theoretical advantages of these models and potential novel applications, academic labs, which operate on a smaller scale than industry, must continue to refine and assess the opportunities and limitations of PDX models in order to ensure the greatest bench-to-bedside translation of novel therapies. Our group has been working with PDX models over the last seven years and has developed a large and robust bank of PDX models of which the majority has undergone full genomic annotation. In this session on practical applications of PDX models, specific examples will be presented that represent distinct scenarios of preclinical development within the context of the opportunities, challenges, and lessons learned in utilizing these models in xenopatient trials. There is no doubt that PDX models represent a more clinically relevant platform for oncology drug development, but it will be important to recognize their strengths and weaknesses in order to fully exploit their potential in the drug development process. This is particularly important for academic labs where partnerships with industry are valuable and resources may be limited.

Citation Format: S. Gail Eckhardt, Todd Pitts, Aik Choon Tan, Stacey Bagby, John Arcaroli, Anna Capasso, Kit Wong, Peter Klauck, Wells Messersmith, S Lindsey Davis, Christopher Lieu, Stephen Leong, Jennifer Diamond, John Tentler. Challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned in the bench-to-bedside translation of xenopatient studies. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Patient-Derived Cancer Models: Present and Future Applications from Basic Science to the Clinic; Feb 11-14, 2016; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(16_Suppl):Abstract nr IA20.

Abstract PR03: Characterizing the immune context of responses to immunotherapy in humanized patient derived xenograft models of CRC

Introduction: Inhibiting the activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with monoclonal antibodies has been utilized as a therapeutic strategy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), leading to improved clinical results alone and in combination with standard chemotherapy. Many systematic reviews and metanalyses were performed to better understand the role of EGFR inhibition in CRC, revealing that KRAS exon 2 mutations and furthermore exons 3 and 4 and NRAS exons 2, 3, and 4 were predictive of non-responsiveness to these agents. Concurrent with these results has been the development of immunotherapy targeting immune regulatory checkpoints such as CTLA-4 and PD-1 that have initiated a new era in the treatment of cancer. In order to gain a better biological understanding of the context of immune responses and facilitate preclinical evaluation of cancer immunotherapy, we developed a hematopoietic humanized mouse model utilizing patient-derived CRC xenograft tumor models to assess immune therapy for RAS mutant CRC. Not only could evaluation of humanized RAS mutant PDX models provide additional information on the potential for clinical activity of immune therapies, but could also improve the understanding of immune responses to RAS mutant cancers. We therefore hypothesize that humanized RAS mutant colorectal PDX models can be used to evaluate the preclinical activity of immune targeted agents for treatment of RAS mutant colorectal cancer.

Methods: Humanized BRG mice developed from the BALB/cRag2-/-IL2Rγc-/- (BRG) strain which is known to accept human hematopoietic stem cells, have been used to enhance engraftment. BRG newborn pups were humanized through transplantation of approximately 1x105 CD34+ cells purified from umbilical cord blood. The mice were evaluated for chimerism at 8 and 12 weeks. At 14 weeks, tumor tissue from established PDX models were implanted on the right and left flank of humanized mice. The tumor was selected among a cluster within the “immune-enriched” subtype (C2) based upon the RNAseq characterization of the models. When the average tumor size reached a volume of approximately ~150-300 mm3, the mice were randomized into either vehicle or nivolumab treatment groups. Mice were monitored daily for signs of toxicity and weighed twice weekly. They were treated with nivolumab (30 mg/kg) twice a week by intraperitoneal injection for 15 days. Tumor size was evaluated twice weekly by caliper measurements using the following equation: tumor volume= (length × width2) × 0.52. At the end of the treatment, mice were euthanized while sera, lymph nodes, spleen, bone marrow and tumors were collected for further investigation.

Results: Humanized RAS mutant CRC PDX models were successfully established in vivo. While no differences were observed in tumor growth among the control and treated arms, we were able to detect differences in PD1 expression among treated versus control mice, with lower expression in the nivolumab treated group. We also observed higher numbers of T cells in the lymph nodes of nivolumab treated mice, suggesting T cell expansion. Interestingly, we also observed an increase of T cells in the spleen and blood and late occupancy of T cells in the bone marrow. Two of the treated mice exhibited identifiable TILs that were comprised of a majority of CD4+ T cells with an activated phenotype (CD69+).

Conclusions: Humanized KRAS mutant CRC PDX models were successfully established and tumor engraftment occurred in all humanized mice with nivolumab-treated mice demonstrating the development of lymph nodes that were populated by activated T cells. These preliminary results demonstrate that human immunity and PD-1 expressing T cells exist in these models and provide the basis for planned immunotherapy combination studies.

This abstract is also being presented as Poster A23.

Citation Format: Anna Capasso, Julie Lang, Todd M. Pitts, S. Lindsey Davis, Chris H. Lieu, Stacey M. Bagby, Aik Choon Tan, John J. Tentler, Jill E. Slansky, Roberta Pelanda, S. Gail Eckhardt. Characterizing the immune context of responses to immunotherapy in humanized patient derived xenograft models of CRC. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Patient-Derived Cancer Models: Present and Future Applications from Basic Science to the Clinic; Feb 11-14, 2016; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(16_Suppl):Abstract nr PR03.