Long term follow-up and patterns of response, progression and hyperprogression in patients after PD-1 blockade in advanced sarcoma

PURPOSE

PD-1 blockade can mediate objective responses in advanced sarcomas, but their durability has not been established and it is unclear if hyperprogressive disease (HPD) occurs in sarcomas treated with PD-1 inhibitors.

METHODS

We pooled patients who were treated prospectively with nivolumab or pembrolizumab as monotherapy or with bempegaldesleukin, epacadostat, ipilimumab or Talimogene laherparepvec. We did a new independent assessment for HPD and analyzed clinical, pathologic and genomic data from baseline tumor biopsies. Our primary endpoint was the incidence of HPD; secondary endpoints were clinical or genomic correlates of response or HPD.

RESULTS

We treated 134 patients with advanced sarcoma from 2015 - 2019. Twenty-one patients (16%) had a complete or partial response (CR/PR), and 30% of responses were durable for over 2 years. Forty-eight (36%) patients had stable disease (SD), 45 (34%) had progressive disease without HPD (PD) and 15 (11%) had HPD. Five patients (4%) were not evaluable for HPD. The sarcoma subtypes, sites of metastasis, clinical course, and genomic alterations in patients with PD and HPD were similar, except HPD tumors were smaller at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced sarcoma, PD-1 blockade can mediate durable responses. HPD occurs in sarcoma at an incidence that is similar to what has been reported in other solid tumors, but patients with HPD were clinically and biologically similar to those who had PD. Further research is required to establish whether HPD is a biologically distinct phenomenon and whether a theoretical risk of HPD should influence patient management.

Case Report: Response to Regional Melphalan via Limb Infusion and Systemic PD1 Blockade in Recurrent Myxofibrosarcoma: A Report of 2 Cases

Treatment options for patients with advanced sarcoma remain limited. Promising responses to checkpoint inhibition have been observed, but responses to single-agent PD-1 inhibition are rare. We report on two patients with multiply recurrent myxofibrosarcoma treated with the combination of regionally administered melphalan (via isolated limb infusion) and pembrolizumab. Both patients had recurrent disease after multiple surgical resections and radiation. Analysis of primary tumors demonstrated microsatellite stable tumors with few mutations. After combination treatment, one patient had a significant partial response of 6 months duration, the second patient had a complete response of 2 years duration. Post treatment biopsies demonstrated immune infiltration into the tumor. These promising responses in patients with multiply recurrent myxofibrosarcoma have prompted the development of an investigator-initiated clinical trial to formally study the combination of regional melphalan and pembrolizumab in a systematic fashion (NCT04332874).

Avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (JAVELIN Merkel 200): updated overall survival data after >5 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer that has a poor prognosis in patients with advanced disease. Avelumab [anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)] became the first approved treatment for patients with metastatic MCC (mMCC), based on efficacy and safety data observed in the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial. We report long-term overall survival (OS) data after >5 years of follow-up from the cohort of patients with mMCC whose disease had progressed after one or more prior lines of chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In Part A of the single-arm, open-label, phase II JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial, patients with mMCC that had progressed following one or more prior lines of chemotherapy received avelumab 10 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. In this analysis, long-term OS was analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 88 patients were treated with avelumab. At data cut-off (25 September 2020), median follow-up was 65.1 months (range 60.8-74.1 months). One patient (1.1%) remained on treatment, and an additional patient (1.1%) had reinitiated avelumab after previously discontinuing treatment. Median OS was 12.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.5-17.1 months], with a 5-year OS rate of 26% (95% CI 17% to 36%). In patients with PD-L1+ versus PD-L1- tumors, median OS was 12.9 months (95% CI 8.7-29.6 months) versus 7.3 months (95% CI 3.4-14.0 months), and the 5-year OS rate was 28% (95% CI 17% to 40%) versus 19% (95% CI 5% to 40%), respectively (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.36-1.25).

CONCLUSION

Avelumab monotherapy resulted in meaningful long-term OS in patients with mMCC whose disease had progressed following chemotherapy. These results further support the role of avelumab as a standard of care for patients with mMCC.

18F-FDG PET/CT for post-treatment surveillance imaging of patients with stage III Merkel cell carcinoma

To investigate diagnostic and prognostic value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for surveillance imaging in patients treated for Stage III Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Methods: This retrospective study included 61 consecutive stage III MCC patients, who were clinically asymptomatic and underwent surveillance FDG-PET/CT. Findings were correlated with either pathology and/or clinical/imaging follow-up. Median follow-up period was 4.8 years. Statistical analyses were performed. Results: FDG-PET/CT detected unsuspected recurrences in 33% patients (20/61) with lesion-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. Mean±SD SUV for malignant and benign lesions was 7.5±3.9 and 3.8±2.0, respectively. Unknown distant metastases, as first recurrence site, were noted in 12 of 61 patients. Those with positive disease on FDG-PET/CT within one year of definitive treatment had relatively worse overall survival (p<0.0001). After adjustment on stage, risk of death increased with higher SUV_max (HR for one unit=1.17;P = 0.006) and with a higher number of positive lesions on FDG-PET/CT (HR for one additional lesion = 1.60;p<0.001). Conclusion: Post-definitive treatment surveillance FDG-PET/CT scan detects unsuspected recurrences and has prognostic value. Inclusion of FDG-PET/CT within the first 6 months after definitive treatment would be appropriate for surveillance and early detection of recurrence. Our data merits further studies to evaluate the prognostic implications.

First-line avelumab in a cohort of 116 patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (JAVELIN Merkel 200): primary and biomarker analyses of a phase II study

Background

Avelumab (anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)) is approved in multiple countries for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC), a rare and aggressive skin cancer. We report efficacy and safety data and exploratory biomarker analyses from a cohort of patients with mMCC treated with first-line avelumab in a phase II trial.

Methods

Patients with treatment-naive mMCC received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was durable response, defined as objective response (complete or partial response; assessed by independent review) lasting ≥6 months. Additional assessments included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and biomarker analyses.

Results

In 116 patients treated with avelumab, median follow-up was 21.2 months (range: 14.9–36.6). Thirty-five patients had a response lasting ≥6 months, giving a durable response rate of 30.2% (95% CI: 22.0% to 39.4%). The objective response rate was 39.7% (95% CI: 30.7% to 49.2%). Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI: 1.4 to 6.1) and median OS was 20.3 months (95% CI: 12.4 to not estimable). Response rates were numerically higher in patients with PD-L1+ tumors, Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)-negative tumors, and tumors with increased intratumoral CD8⁺ T-cell density. Exploratory analyses did not identify a biomarker that could reliably predict a response to first-line treatment with avelumab; however, a novel gene expression signature to identify the presence of MCPyV+ tumors was derived. Treatment-related adverse events (any grade) occurred in 94 (81.0%) patients, including grade 3/4 events in 21 (18.1%) patients; no treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusion

In patients with mMCC, first-line treatment with avelumab led to responses in 40% and durable responses in 30%, and was associated with a low rate of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events.

The impact of MYC amplification on clinicopathologic features and prognosis of radiation-associated angiosarcomas of the breast

AIMS

Radiation-associated angiosarcomas (RT-AS) of the breast are rare tumours with poor prognosis. MYC amplification is considered the hallmark of RT-AS and is sometimes used as a diagnostic tool to distinguish from other radiation-associated vascular lesions. However, a small subset of RT-AS lacks MYC amplification, which may be associated with better outcome. Loss of H3K27me3 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been recently postulated as an additional diagnostic marker for RT-AS. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of MYC amplification as detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization and/or next-generation sequencing on clinicopathologic features and outcome in a large cohort of RT-AS, compare outcome with radiation-associated sarcomas of the breast (RT-S) other than angiosarcoma, and evaluate expression of H3K27me3 IHC in these groups.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighty-one RT-AS were identified, including 73 MYC amplified and 8 (10%) non-amplified. MYC amplified RT-AS were diagnosed in older patients (median age 69 vs 61 years). The 5-year disease specific survival and overall survival were 56% and 47%, respectively. Older age, larger tumour size, positive margin and MYC amplification were associated with worse prognosis. None of the RT-AS showed complete loss of H3K27me3 IHC expression. All 18 RT-S were MYC non-amplified, and complete loss of H3K27me3 expression was seen in 2. We found no difference in prognosis between RT-AS and RT-S.

CONCLUSIONS

RT-AS is associated with a poor prognosis. Older age at diagnosis, larger tumour size, positive margin at excision and MYC amplification are associated with worse prognosis.

Avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: long-term data and biomarker analyses from the single-arm phase 2 JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial

Background

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer associated with a high risk of metastasis. In 2017, avelumab (anti–programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)) became the first approved treatment for patients with metastatic MCC (mMCC), based on the occurrence of durable responses in a subset of patients. Here, we report long-term efficacy and safety data and exploratory biomarker analyses in patients with mMCC treated with avelumab.

Methods

In a cohort of this single-arm, phase 2 trial (JAVELIN Merkel 200), patients with mMCC and disease progression after prior chemotherapy received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. Other assessments included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), safety and biomarker analyses.

Results

As of 14 September 2018, 88 patients had been followed up for a median of 40.8 months (range 36.4–49.7 months). The ORR was 33.0% (95% CI 23.3% to 43.8%), including a complete response in 11.4% (10 patients), and the median duration of response was 40.5 months (95% CI 18.0 months to not estimable). As of 2 May 2019 (≥44 months of follow-up), the median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI 7.5 to 17.1 months) and the 42-month OS rate was 31% (95% CI 22% to 41%). Of long-term survivors (OS >36 months) evaluable for PD-L1 expression status (n=22), 81.8% had PD-L1+ tumors. In exploratory biomarker analyses, high tumor mutational burden (≥2 non-synonymous somatic variants per megabase) and high major histocompatibility complex class I expression (30% of tumors with highest expression) were associated with trends for improved ORR and OS. In long-term safety assessments (≥36 months of follow-up), no new or unexpected adverse events were reported, and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusions

Avelumab showed continued durable responses and meaningful long-term survival outcomes in patients with mMCC, reinforcing avelumab as a standard-of-care treatment option for this disease.

Trial registration number

NCT02155647

Master protocol to assess safety and recommended phase 2 dose of next generation NY-ESO-1–specific TCR T-cells in HLA-A*02 patients with synovial sarcoma or non-small cell lung cancer (Substudies 1 and 2)

TPS2661

Background: Letetresgene autoleucel (lete-cel; GSK3377794) is an autologous T-cell therapy using a genetically modified T-cell receptor (TCR) to improve recognition of cancer cells expressing NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a. Next generation NY-ESO-1 TCR T-cell therapies, such as GSK3901961 and GSK3845097, integrate added genetic modifications to enhance anticancer activity. GSK3901961 co-expresses the CD8α chain to stabilize TCR-human leukocyte A (HLA) class I interactions on CD4+ T cells, improving T-cell persistence and helper functions such as Type 1 T-helper antitumor responses. GSK3845097 co-expresses a dominant negative transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) type II receptor to reduce TGF-β pathway activation and maintain T-cell proliferation, cytokine production, and cytotoxicity in the tumor microenvironment. A first-time-in-human master protocol (NCT04526509) will evaluate safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of these and possible subsequent therapies. Substudy 1 will assess GSK3901961 in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or synovial sarcoma (SS). Substudy 2 will assess GSK3845097 in pts with advanced SS. Methods: Each substudy includes a dose confirmation stage to assess RP2D and a dose expansion stage. Key inclusion criteria are age ≥18 y; measurable disease per RECIST v1.1; HLA-A*02:01, A*02:05, or A*02:06 positivity; NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a tumor expression; advanced (metastatic/unresectable) SS with t(X;18) translocation and anthracycline-based therapy receipt/completion/intolerance (SS only); and Stage IV NSCLC, receipt of ≥1 prior line(s) of standard of care (SOC) therapy including programmed death receptor- or ligand-1 inhibitors, and SOC chemotherapy receipt/intolerance (Substudy 1 only). Key exclusion criteria are prior malignancy that is not in complete remission or clinically significant systemic illness; prior receipt of gene/NY-ESO-1–specific therapy or allogenic stem cell/solid organ transplant; central nervous system metastases (SS only); and actionable genetic aberration and receipt/failure of ≥3 systemic therapy lines (Substudy 1 only). Primary endpoints are safety (adverse events) and tolerability (dose-limiting toxicities). Secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed overall response rate, duration of response, and maximum expansion/persistence and phenotype of infiltrating transduced T cells. Exploratory endpoints include laboratory parameters, overall survival, and anti-GSK3901961 or -GSK3845097 titers as applicable. Analyses will be descriptive. The substudies are enrolling. Funding: GSK (209012; NCT04526509). Editorial support was provided by Eithne Maguire, PhD, of Fishawack Indicia, part of Fishawack Health; funded by GSK. Previously presented at AACR 2021 (CT219). Clinical trial information: NCT04526509.

IGNYTE-ESO: A master protocol to assess safety and activity of letetresgene autoleucel (lete-cel; GSK3377794) in HLA-A*02+ patients with synovial sarcoma or myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (Substudies 1 and 2)

TPS11582

Background: Letetresgene autoleucel (lete-cel; GSK3377794) is an autologous T-cell product using a genetically modified T-cell receptor to target cancer cells expressing the cancer testis antigen New-York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 1 (NY-ESO-1). Lete-cel is currently being investigated alone and in combination in multiple tumor types [1,2]. NY-ESO-1 is expressed in 70‒80% of synovial sarcoma (SS) and 80‒90% of myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCLS) tumors [3,4], suggesting these tumors may be prime lete-cel targets. This master protocol design (IGNYTE-ESO; NCT03967223) enables evaluation of multiple cell therapies in multiple tumor types and treatment stages in separate substudies, beginning with lete-cel in Substudies 1 and 2 for SS and MRCLS. Methods: Substudy 1 is a single-arm study assessing lete-cel in treatment-naïve patients (pts; ie, anthracycline therapy-naïve for metastatic disease) with advanced (metastatic/unresectable) NY-ESO-1+ SS or MRCLS as a first line of therapy (n=10 planned). Substudy 2 is a pivotal, single-arm study assessing lete-cel in pts with NY-ESO-1+ SS or MRCLS who progressed after anthracycline therapy (n=70 planned). Key eligibility criteria are age ≥10 y and NY-ESO-1 and HLA-A*02 positivity. Exclusion criteria include prior NY-ESO-1–specific/gene therapy, allogeneic stem cell transplant, and central nervous system metastases. Screened pts undergo leukapheresis for lete-cel manufacture, lymphodepletion, lete-cel infusion, and follow-up (FU). Long-term FU (15 y) may be done under a separate protocol. The Substudy 2 primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 assessed by central independent review. Substudy 1 is not testing any formal hypotheses; statistical analysis will be descriptive. Substudy 2 is comparing ORR with the historical control assuming at least 90% power with 0.025 one-sided type I error. Secondary endpoints include efficacy (time to/duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival), safety (adverse event [AE] frequency/severity, serious AEs, AEs of special interest), and pharmacokinetic (maximum transgene expansion [Cmax], time to Cmax, area under the time curve from zero to time t as data permit). Enrollment began in December 2019. References: 1. Reckamp KL, et al. Ann Oncol 2019;30(Suppl_5):v602–v660. 2. Rapoport A, et al. J Clin Oncol 2020 38:15_suppl, TPS8555. 3. D’Angelo SP, et al. Cancer Discov 2018;8(8):944–957. 4. D’Angelo SP, et al. J Clin Oncol 2018 36:15_suppl, 3005. Funding: GSK. Editorial support was provided by Eithne Maguire, PhD, of Fishawack Indicia, part of Fishawack Health, and funded by GSK. Previously presented at BSG 2021 (P914542). Clinical trial information: NCT03967223.

Safety and efficacy of letetresgene autoleucel (lete-cel; GSK3377794) in advanced myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCLS) following high lymphodepletion (Cohort 2): Interim analysis

11521

Background: Cancer testis antigen NY-ESO-1 is expressed in multiple tumor types, including 80‒90% of MRCLS [1,2]. Overall response rates (ORRs) to MRCLS treatment are low (1L, <20%; 2L, <10%) [2]. Lete-cel, an autologous T-cell therapy, targets NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a+ tumors using a genetically modified, high-affinity T-cell receptor. High-dose lymphodepletion (LD) was linked with better responses in synovial sarcoma [3]; the current study tested this hypothesis in MRCLS. Methods: This open label, pilot study evaluates lete-cel efficacy and safety in advanced MRCLS following low-dose (Cohort 1 [C1]; 30 mg/m2 fludarabine [flu] x 3d + 600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide [cy] x 3d) or high-dose (Cohort 2 [C2]; 30 mg/m2 flu x 4d + 900 mg/m2 cy x 3d; initiated based on C1 data) LD. Key eligibility: age ≥18 y; HLA-A*02:01; A*02:05, or A*02:06; advanced high-grade NY-ESO-1+ MRCLS (≥30% of cells 2+/3+ by IHC); prior anthracycline; measurable disease; specified washouts; and active/chronic/intercurrent illness restrictions. Stages include screening, leukapheresis, lete-cel manufacture, LD, lete-cel infusion (1– 8 × 109 transduced T cells), follow-up. Response is assessed at wk 4, 8, 12, and 24, then every 3 mo to disease progression/death/withdrawal. The primary efficacy endpoint is investigator-assessed ORR by RECIST v1.1. In C1 (n=10 patients [pts]), lete-cel was well tolerated and linked with 2 confirmed partial responses (PR; ORR, 20%) and stable disease (SD) in 8 pts. Planned interim analysis for C2, shown here, was done once all 10 treated pts had ≥3 post-baseline disease assessments or progressed/died/withdrew. Efficacy data will be correlated with transduced cell kinetics and pharmacodynamics marker profiles. Results: Durable (1.0–7.8 mo) PR (4/10 pts [ORR, 40%]; 2 ongoing) and prolonged (2.7–10.6 mo) SD (5/10 pts; 3 ongoing) with tumor regression were observed. Treatment-emergent cytopenias occurred in all pts. All experienced T-cell related cytokine release syndrome (5 serious adverse events; 30% Grade 3), with onset ≤5d of infusion and median duration 7.5d. Graft-vs-host disease, immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, pancytopenia, or aplastic anemia were not reported. Conclusions: A single lete-cel infusion after high LD showed antitumor activity in advanced MRCLS and a manageable safety profile consistent with other lete-cel studies. The trial is active but no longer recruiting (NCT02992743). MRCLS is included in a separate, ongoing lete-cel study (NCT03967223). References: 1. D’Angelo SP, et al. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:15_suppl, 3005. 2. Pollack SM, et al. Cancer Med 2020;9(13):4593–602. 3. D’Angelo SP, et al. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8:P298. Funding: GSK (208469; NCT02992743). Editorial support was provided by Eithne Maguire, PhD, of Fishawack Indicia, part of Fishawack Health, and funded by GSK. Clinical trial information: NCT02992743.

Avelumab in patients with previously treated Merkel cell carcinoma (JAVELIN Merkel 200): Updated overall survival data after more than five years of follow up

9517

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer. Although MCC is considered chemosensitive, patients typically have limited survival benefit with chemotherapy. Before the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors, patients with metastatic MCC (mMCC) had a poor prognosis, with a historical 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of approximately 14%. Avelumab (anti–PD-L1) became the first approved treatment for patients with mMCC, based on efficacy and safety data observed in the phase 2 JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial (NCT02155647), in which patients with mMCC received avelumab monotherapy. We report the long-term OS data from the cohort of patients with mMCC whose disease had progressed after ≥1 prior line of chemotherapy. Methods: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed, measurable (per RECIST 1.1) stage IV MCC. Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Long-term OS was analyzed; updated data for other efficacy endpoints, including response and progression-free survival, were not obtained. Results: A total of 88 patients were enrolled and received avelumab treatment. As of September 25, 2020 (data cutoff), median follow-up was 65.1 months (range, 60.8-74.1 months). Median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI, 7.5-17.1 months); the 48- and 60-month OS rates were 30% (95% CI, 20%-40%) and 26% (95% CI, 17%-36%), respectively. At data cutoff, treatment was ongoing in 1 patient (1.1%) and an additional patient (1.1%) had reinitiated avelumab after previously discontinuing treatment. Reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression (n = 45 [51.1%]), adverse event (AE; n = 11 [12.5%]), death (n = 10 [11.4%]), withdrawal of consent (n = 9 [10.2%]), loss to follow-up (n = 1 [1.1%]), protocol noncompliance (n = 1 [1.1%]), and other reason (n = 10 [11.4%]). At data cutoff, 19 patients (21.6%) had discontinued treatment but remained in follow-up, and 63 patients (71.6%) had died; causes of death were disease progression (n = 49 [55.7%]), unknown reason (n = 9 [10.2%]), AE not related to study treatment (n = 3 [3.4%]), and other reason (n = 2 [2.3%]). In total, 26 patients (29.5%) received subsequent anticancer therapy; the most common subsequent therapies after trial discontinuation were avelumab (n = 4 [4.5%]), carboplatin and etoposide (n = 4 [4.5%]), and pembrolizumab (n = 4 [4.5%]). Conclusions: Avelumab monotherapy led to meaningful long-term OS in a subset of patients with mMCC whose disease had progressed after chemotherapy. These results further support the role of avelumab as a standard-of-care treatment for patients with mMCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02155647.

A phase 1b study of avelumab plus DCC-3014, a potent and selective inhibitor of colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R), in patients with advanced high-grade sarcoma

11549

Background: Select sarcomas are infiltrated with immunosuppressive myeloid cells. DCC-3014 is an inhibitor of the CSF1R kinase that decreases tumor infiltrating myeloid cells in preclinical models. We hypothesized that DCC-3014 combined with the anti-PDL1 inhibitor avelumab would be safe and tolerable, decrease immunosuppressive myeloid cells, and increase cytotoxic T cells. Methods: This investigator initiated, open label, single center, phase I study of DCC-3014 plus avelumab in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic sarcoma utilized a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. DCC-3014 was administered on days 1-3 (loading dose of 20, 30, or 50 mg) followed by oral daily maintenance (10, 14, or 20 mg) in 28-day cycles; 800 mg of IV avelumab was administered q2weeks. The primary endpoint was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints defined the adverse event (AE) profile and assessed clinical efficacy. Peripheral blood CD14+Lin-HLA-DRlo myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) were measured by flow cytometry. Results: 13 pts were treated; median age was 61 (range 32 – 71), 8 were female, and median prior lines of therapy was 5 (range 2 – 10). Histologic subtypes included leiomyosarcoma (LMS, n = 7), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (2), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (LPS, 2), synovial sarcoma (1), and pleomorphic LPS (1). The Table lists treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) of any grade (G) occurring in ≥ 10% of pts and all G ≥ 3 TRAEs, sorted by frequency. All pts had at least 1 TRAE. Seven pts (54%) had a G ≥ 3 TRAE. Most TRAEs were either G ≤ 2 or expected on-target effects of CSF1R inhibition. 1 of 6 pts on the highest dose level had a dose limiting toxicity (G4 elevated AST with abdominal pain) that resolved with treatment cessation. The highest dose level was declared the RP2D. Best objective response by RECIST 1.1 was stable disease in 3 pts; 2 had LMS and were treated at the highest dose level. At baseline, the mean proportion of monocytes in peripheral blood samples with an MDSC phenotype was 12.2% (range 7.1 – 19.9). 5 of 7 pts with serial blood samples had decreased circulating MDSCs (mean decrease of 26.9% from baseline to last time point). Conclusions: DCC-3014 combined with avelumab was safe and tolerable. Study therapy decreased circulating MDSCs in select patients; T cell analyses will be reported. Study expansion at the RP2D is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04242238. [Table: see text]

ENVASARC: A pivotal trial of envafolimab, and envafolimab in combination with ipilimumab, in patients with advanced or metastatic undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma or myxofibrosarcoma who have progressed on prior chemotherapy

TPS11581

Background: Metastatic undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma (UPS) and the genetically related myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) are soft tissue sarcoma (STS) subtypes with poor prognoses. While responses to front line chemotherapy can approach 20%, efficacy remains limited in the 2nd line setting and beyond. Pazopanib, the only approved treatment in the refractory setting, has demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 4%. Envafolimab is a single domain PD-L1 antibody administered rapidly by subcutaneous (SQ) injection that is being studied in two additional pivotal trials: microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancer and biliary tract cancer. The activity of envafolimab appears to be similar to other PD-1 antibodies administered i.v. Envafolimab demonstrated a 32% objective response rate (ORR) in MSI-H colorectal cancer patients who failed three approved chemotherapeutics, similar to the ORR of 28% and 33% with nivolumab and pembrolizumab in these patient populations, respectively. The rationale for the ENVASARC trial is based on the previously reported activity of checkpoint inhibition in UPS/MFS. Single agent pembrolizumab demonstrated a 23% ORR, while the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrated a 29% ORR in refractory UPS/MFS. Methods: ENVASARC (NCT 04480502) is a pivotal multicenter (at ̃25 U.S. centers) open-label, randomized, non-comparative, parallel cohort study of treatment with envafolimab 300 mg every 3 weeks by SQ injection (cohort A; n = 80) or envafolimab 300 mg every 3 weeks by SQ injection combined with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks i.v. for four doses (cohort B; n = 80) in patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic UPS/MFS who have progressed on one or two lines of prior therapy. The primary objective of each of parallel cohort is to demonstrate an ORR with a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval that excludes 5.0% in each cohort. If ≥ 9 responders are observed of the 80 patients enrolled in each cohort, then the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval will exclude 5.0%. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), PFS and OS. Key inclusion criteria: ≤ 2 prior lines of therapy (neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy excluded), ECOG ≤ 1. Clinical trial information: NCT 04480502.

SPEARHEAD-1: A phase 2 trial of afamitresgene autoleucel (Formerly ADP-A2M4) in patients with advanced synovial sarcoma or myxoid/round cell liposarcoma

11504

Background: This phase 2, open-label trial (SPEARHEAD-1; NCT04044768) is designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of afamitresgene autoleucel in 45 patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic synovial sarcoma or Myxoid/Round Cell Liposarcoma (MRCLS). Methods: Eligible pts are HLA-A*02 positive with MAGE-A4-expressing tumors. Pts undergo leukapheresis for collection of autologous T-cells for processing and manufacture into afamitresgene autoleucel cells. Pts were treated with afamitresgene autoleucel doses between 1–10 × 109 transduced T-cells after receiving lymphodepleting chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 by independent review. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board reviews ongoing safety and benefit: risk during the interventional phase. Results: As of Feb 4, 2021, 32 pts received afamitresgene autoleucel. Of these pts, 59% were male, 87.5% had synovial sarcoma, the median age was 43 yrs (range: 24–73), and they had a median of 3 prior systemic lines of therapy. The MAGE-A4 antigen expression level (histoscore) ranged from 112–300, and the transduced cell dose ranged from 2.7–9.9 x 109. At the data cutoff, 25 pts were evaluable for preliminary efficacy (23 with synovial sarcoma and 2 with MRCLS) and 7 pts (5 with synovial sarcoma and 2 with MRCLS) had insufficient follow-up (<8 weeks follow-up and/or awaiting first scan). Of the 25 evaluable pts, the investigator-assessed responses were: complete response (2 pts), partial response (8 pts), stable disease (11 pts), and progressive disease (4 pts). All responses were confirmed. Nine of the 10 responders had ongoing response at the data cutoff and 3 responders had MAGE-A4 antigen histoscores <200. The most common AEs of any grade (>30% pts) were neutropenia, lymphopenia, nausea, cytokine release syndrome, leukopenia, fatigue, pyrexia, and anemia. Cytokine release syndrome of any grade occurred in 19/32 pts; 95% of those events were ≤Grade 2. No immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) has been reported to date. Cytopenia (≥G3) at 4 wks post-infusion was observed in 6 pts (anemia 3 pts, neutropenia 2 pts, and thrombocytopenia 1 pt). Conclusion: These preliminary data demonstrate afamitresgene autoleucel is efficacious and well tolerated in heavily pre-treated pts. Objective responses are reported across a wide range of MAGE-A4 antigen levels and deep responses have been observed. Initial durability data is encouraging. Preliminary response data in SPEARHEAD-1 is comparable to the findings of the prior Phase 1 trial [1]. To date, the safety profile of afamitresgene autoleucel has been favorable, with mainly low-grade cytokine release syndrome and tolerable/reversible hematologic toxicities. [1]. Van Tine BA, et al. CTOS; November 18-21, 2020; Virtual. Clinical trial information: NCT04044768.

Selinexor, a First in Class, Nuclear Export Inhibitor for the Treatment of Advanced Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a highly malignant neoplasm arising from peripheral nerve or its attendant sheath and is derived from Schwann or pluripotent cells of neural crest origin. Patients with recurrent, unresectable, or advanced stage disease have limited treatment options, and current therapies are associated with little benefit. In this article, we report nine cases of MPNST treated with selinexor, an orally bioavailable, selective inhibitor of nuclear export, accompanied by tumor stabilization or regression.

Objective Response Rate Among Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Sarcoma Treated With Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Pembrolizumab: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Importance

Patients with advanced sarcoma have limited treatment options. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) has been shown to increase tumor-specific immune activation via augmenting antigen presentation and T-cell priming.

Objective

To examine whether T-VEC in combination with pembrolizumab is associated with increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte infiltration and programmed death-ligand 1 expression and thus with increased antitumor activity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This open-label, single-institution phase 2 interventional trial of T-VEC plus pembrolizumab enrolled 20 patients with locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma between March 16 and December 4, 2017, for whom at least 1 standard systemic therapy had failed. The median duration of therapy was 16 weeks (range, 7-67 weeks). Reported analyses include data through December 14, 2018.

Intervention

Patients received pembrolizumab (200-mg flat dose) intravenously and T-VEC (first dose, ≤4 mL × 106 plaque-forming units [PFU]/mL; second and subsequent doses, ≤4 mL × 108 PFU/mL) injected into palpable tumor site(s) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR; complete response and partial response) at 24 weeks determined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, criteria. Secondary end points included best ORR by immune-related RECIST criteria, progression-free survival rate at 24 weeks, overall survival, and safety.

Results

All 20 patients (12 women [60%]; median age, 63.5 years [range, 24-90 years]) were evaluable for response. The study met its primary end point of evaluating the best ORR at 24 weeks determined by RECIST, version 1.1, criteria; the best ORR was 30% (95% CI, 12%-54%; n = 6). The ORR overall was 35% (95% CI, 15%-59%; n = 7). The incidence of grade 3 treatment-related adverse events was low (4 patients [20%]). There were no grade 4 treatment-related adverse events or treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this phase 2 clinical trial, treatment with T-VEC plus pembrolizumab was associated with antitumor activity in advanced sarcoma across a range of sarcoma histologic subtypes, with a manageable safety profile. This combination therapy met its predefined primary study end point; further evaluation of T-VEC in combination with pembrolizumab for patients with select sarcoma subtypes is planned.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03069378.

Long-term clinical activity, safety and patient-reported quality of life for emactuzumab-treated patients with diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the safety, clinical activity and patient-reported outcomes of patients with diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumour (dTGCT) of the soft tissue who were treated with emactuzumab, a humanised anti-colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) monoclonal antibody and were followed up for up to 2 years after the start of treatment.

METHODS

In this open-label phase 1 study (ClinicalTrials.govNCT01494688), patients received intravenous (IV) emactuzumab from 900 to 2000 mg every two weeks in the dose-escalation phase and at the optimal biological dose of 1000 mg with different schedules in the dose-expansion phase. Adverse event (AE) rates and biomarker assessments from tumour biopsies were analysed. Quality of life was assessed using a standard questionnaire (EuroQol-5D-3L) and the WOMAC® 3.1 Osteoarthritis Index. Tumour responses were determined with magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Altogether, 63 patients were enrolled into the study. The most frequently reported AEs were pruritus, asthenia and oedema. In 36 patients for whom biopsy tissue was available a substantial decrease of CSF1R-positive and CD68/CD163-positive macrophages was detected. The independently reviewed best overall objective response rate (ORR) (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) was 71%. Responses were durable, and an ORR of 70% and 64% was determined after one or two years after enrolment into the study. Clinical activity was accompanied by an improvement in EuroQol-5D-3L and particularly the joint disorder-specific WOMAC score.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic therapy of dTGCT patients with emactuzumab resulted in pronounced and durable responses associated with symptomatic improvement and a manageable safety profile.

Efficacy and immune-related adverse event associations in avelumab-treated patients

BACKGROUND

Adverse events (AEs) of special interest that arise during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, including immune-related AEs (irAEs), have been reported to be associated with improved clinical outcomes. We analyzed patients treated with avelumab from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor and Merkel 200 trials, examining the association between AEs and efficacy while adjusting for confounding factors such as treatment duration and event order.

METHODS

We analyzed efficacy and safety data from 1783 patients treated with the programmed death ligand 1 inhibitor avelumab who were enrolled in expansion cohorts of the JAVELIN Solid Tumor and Merkel 200 trials. To analyze the association between irAEs and efficacy with regard to survival, we used a time-dependent Cox model with time-varying indicators for irAEs, as well as multistate models that accounted for competing risks and time inhomogeneity.

RESULTS

295 patients (16.5%) experienced irAEs and 454 patients (25.5%) experienced infusion-related reactions. There was a reduced risk of death in patients who experienced irAEs compared with those who did not (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.85) using the time-dependent Cox model. The multistate model did not suggest that the occurrence of irAEs could predict response; however, it predicted a higher chance of irAEs occurring after a response. No association was observed between response and infusion-related reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who experience irAEs showed improved survival. Although irAEs are not predictors for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, increased vigilance for irAEs is needed after treatment with avelumab.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT01772004 and NCT02155647.

Health-related quality of life trajectory of treatment-naive patients with Merkel cell carcinoma receiving avelumab

Aim: To evaluate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a Phase II trial (NCT02155647) of treatment-naive patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma treated with avelumab (15-month follow-up). Materials & methods: Mixed-effect Models for Repeated Measures were applied to HRQoL data (FACT-M; EQ-5D-5L) to assess changes over time. Clinically derived progression-free survival was compared with HRQoL deterioration-free survival. Results: Overall, we saw relative stability in HRQoL among 116 included patients, with nonprogression associated with statistically and clinically meaningful better HRQoL compared with progressive disease. Deterioration-free survival rates (49-72% at 6 months, 40-58% at 12 months) were consistently higher/better compared with progression-free survival rates (41/31% at 6/12 months). Conclusion: These findings show unique longitudinal HRQoL data for treatment-naive metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma patients treated with avelumab. Clinical trial registration: NCT02155647 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

HLA Genotyping in Synovial Sarcoma: Identifying HLA-A*02 and Its Association with Clinical Outcome

PURPOSE

To determine if a targeted exome panel utilizing matched normal DNA can accurately detect germline and somatic HLA genes in patients with synovial sarcoma (SS) and whether select HLA-A*02 genotypes are prognostic or predictive of outcome in metastatic SS.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with metastatic SS consented to HLA typing by a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified test to determine eligibility for a clinical trial of NY-ESO-1-specific engineered T cells restricted to carriers of HLA-A*02:01, -A*02:05, or -A*02:06 (HLA-A*02 eligible). HLA genotype was determined from Memorial Sloan Kettering Integrated Molecular Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT), where feasible, and somatic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in HLA alleles was identified. Overall survival (OS) was estimated and stratified by HLA-A*02 eligibility.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients had HLA genotyping by a CLIA-certified lab and MSK-IMPACT. Ninety percent (108/110) of the sequenced alleles were concordant between IMPACT and the outside lab. LOH of HLA genes was detected in three tumors, one had loss of HLA-A*02:01. In total, 66 patients were screened for T-cell therapy and 20 (30%) were HLA-A*02 eligible on outside testing. Univariate analysis of OS from the time of metastasis found HLA-A*02 eligibility was marginally associated with shorter OS [HR = 1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.995-3.813; P = 0.052]. On multivariate analysis, older age and larger tumor size, but not HLA-A*02 eligibility, were significantly associated with decreased OS. HLA-A*02 eligibility did not impact OS after chemotherapy or pazopanib in the metastatic setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted gene panels like MSK-IMPACT may accurately report HLA type and identify loss of somatic HLA alleles. In a multivariable model, HLA-A*02 eligibility was not significantly associated with OS in patients with metastatic SS.

Patient Experiences with Avelumab in Treatment-Naïve Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Longitudinal Qualitative Interview Findings from JAVELIN Merkel 200, a Registrational Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Avelumab is approved for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma, a rare aggressive skin cancer with a poor prognosis. The aim of this qualitative study embedded in a clinical trial was to explore patient experiences while receiving avelumab.

METHODS

All treatment-naïve patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma entering part B of the phase II, open-label, international, JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial (NCT02155647) were invited to participate in optional semi-structured phone interviews before avelumab administration (baseline) and at weeks 13 and 25. Interviews were conducted by trained professionals, audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed. Key concepts identified at baseline were assessed during follow-up interviews.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients completed the baseline interview; 19 had at least one follow-up interview. Baseline interviews described the patients' challenging journeys before being correctly diagnosed with Merkel cell carcinoma, the negative psychological burden of living with a symptomless disease and the hope for avelumab to be a successful therapy. During the trial, most patients reported an increased or continued sense of hope and willingness to fight metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Patients who self-reported disease improvement (n = 12) also reported stability or improvement in physical well-being and ability to do daily activities, having more energy, worrying less and being optimistic. Six patients who reported their condition as stable (n = 4) or worsened (n = 3) reported a worsening of physical well-being. Nine patients reported fatigue/tiredness on the day of and after receiving avelumab. Baseline and longitudinal experiences were similar across countries.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that patients experience perceptible benefits in physical and psychological well-being following treatment success with first-line avelumab in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma.

Association of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with improved clinical outcome in sarcoma patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)

11510

Background: IrAEs are associated with improved clinical outcomes after treatment with ICB in select epithelial malignancies. We hypothesized that sarcoma patients (pts) treated with ICB who developed an irAE would have improved outcomes compared to pts who had no irAE. Methods: Adverse events (AEs) from 3 sarcoma-specific ICB trials (nivolumab plus NKTR-214, pembrolizumab plus epacadostat, and pembrolizumab plus T-VEC) were reviewed. AEs probably or definitely related to ICB were classified as immune- or non-immune-related by the principal investigator. Endpoints of interest included best overall response (BOR) by RECIST 1.1 (complete response [CR]/partial response [PR]), durable clinical benefit (DCB; CR/PR/stable disease [SD] ≥ 16 weeks), and progression-free survival (PFS). Outcomes were stratified by the presence or absence of ≥ 1 irAE of any grade and by grade 1-2, grade 3-4, or no irAE (three-category comparison). Results: A total of 124 pts received ICB on these studies. Median pt age was 56 (range: 13-90); 53% were male; all but one pt had a performance status of ≤ 1. BOR was PR in 12 pts, SD in 41, and PD in 69. 2 pts were not evaluable. 40 pts (32%) had ≥ 1 irAE of any grade, 6 of whom had a grade 3-4 irAE. The most common irAEs (≥ 5% of pts) were rash (15%), arthralgia (11%), myalgia (9%), pruritis (8%), and hypothyroidism (6%). The proportion of pts with a CR/PR was higher in pts with than without an irAE (18% vs. 6%, respectively; P = 0.058). A significantly higher proportion of pts with an irAE had DCB compared to those without (53% and 29%, respectively; P = 0.017). The median PFS of pts with an irAE was 16.6 months compared to 10.6 in those without (P = 0.013). The proportion of pts with a grade 3-4 irAE and a CR/PR was highest (33%) compared to pts with grade 1-2 (15%) or no irAE (6%) (P = 0.048). More pts with grade 3-4 irAE achieved DCB (67%) than grade 1-2 (50%) or no irAE (29%) (P = 0.027). Median PFS was 22.6, 15, and 10.6 weeks in the grade 3-4, grade 1-2, and no irAE groups, respectively (P = 0.047). Conclusions: Approximately one-third of advanced sarcoma pts with ICB-based immunotherapy developed an irAE. As reported previously in select carcinomas, sarcoma pts with irAEs were more likely to have clinical benefit than those without irAEs. Further research is needed to understand the mechanism behind this association and to validate these findings prospectively.

Safety and activity of autologous T cells with enhanced NY-ESO-1–specific T-cell receptor (GSK3377794) in HLA-a*02+ previously-treated and -untreated patients with advanced metastatic/unresectable synovial sarcoma: A master protocol study design (IGNYTE-ESO)

TPS11571

Background: T cells modified to target NY-ESO-1 have shown encouraging activity in HLA-A*02+ patients with NY-ESO-1–positive synovial sarcoma. NY-ESO-1 is a cancer/testis antigen that is expressed across multiple tumor types and highly expressed in synovial sarcoma. NY-ESO-1 TCR T (GSK3377794) are autologous polyclonal T cells transduced by a self-inactivating lentiviral vector to express an affinity-enhanced TCR able to recognize NY-ESO-1 epitope in complex with HLA-A*02. Ongoing trials are evaluating GSK3377794 in multiple solid tumors and multiple myeloma. Methods: This study (NCT03967223) uses a Master Protocol design that allows investigation of GSK3377794 in multiple tumor types under the same protocol in separate substudies. The first two are single-arm substudies in patients with advanced metastatic or unresectable synovial sarcoma: treatment-naïve (1st line [1L], substudy 1; n = 10 planned) and progressing after anthracycline-based chemotherapy (2L+, substudy 2; n = 55 planned). Patients must be aged ≥10 years, have adequate organ function, ECOG performance status 0–1, measurable disease, and no central nervous system metastases. Excluded prior treatments include gene therapy with an integrating vector or NY-ESO-1–specific T cells, vaccine or targeting antibody, or allogeneic stem cell transplant. Patients will undergo leukapheresis and manufacture of GSK3377794; lymphodepletion then GSK3377794 infusion, followed by safety and disease assessments; and long-term follow-up for 15 years (under a separate protocol). The primary objective of substudy 2 is overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 by central independent review. Secondary objectives include time to response, duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, plus safety and tolerability. Exploratory objectives include assessment of the correlation of T-cell persistence with safety, clinical responses, and infused T-cell phenotype. Evaluation of quality of life and daily functioning of patients will also be assessed. Enrollment began in December 2019. These data are presented on behalf of the original authors with their permission. A similar presentation (P453) was presented at the SITC Annual Meeting, National Harbor, MD, USA, Nov 6–10, 2019. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline (208467) Clinical trial information: NCT03967223 .

SPEARHEAD-1: A phase II trial of ADP-A2M4 SPEAR T cells in patients with advanced synovial sarcoma or myxoid/round cell liposarcoma

TPS11569

Background: ADP-A2M4 specific peptide enhanced affinity receptor (SPEAR) T-cells are genetically engineered to target MAGE-A4+ tumors in the context of HLA-A*02. MAGE-A4 has been described as having high expression in synovial sarcoma (SS) and myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCLS) [1, 2]. This Phase 2 trial was initiated based on the favorable benefit:risk profile of ADP-A2M4 observed in a Phase 1 trial (NCT03132922) of ADP-A2M4 which demonstrated compelling clinical responses in patients with SS. Methods: This Phase 2, open-label trial (SPEARHEAD-1; NCT04044768) is designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ADP-A2M4 in patients with advanced/metastatic SS or MRCLS who are HLA-A*02 positive and whose tumors express the MAGE-A4 protein. Enrolled patients are to undergo apheresis, and their isolated T-cells are then transduced with the MAGE-A4c1032 TCR, and expanded. Prior to ADP-A2M4 infusion, patients are to receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy consisting of fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day x 4 days) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2/day x 3 days). Patients are to receive 1 – 10 × 109 transduced T-cells. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board will review ongoing safety and benefit:risk during the interventional phase of the study. Disease will be assessed by independent review per RECIST v1.1 by CT/MRI at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and every 2 months thereafter until confirmed disease progression. As of 24 Jan 2020, there were 17 clinical sites open in the US, one in Canada, and two in Spain. References: 1. Iura K, et al. Cancer-testis antigen expression in synovial sarcoma: NY-ESO-1, PRAME, MAGEA4, and MAGEA1. Human Pathology 2017; 61:130-139. 2. Iura K, et al. MAGEA4 expression in bone and soft tissue tumors: its utility as a target for immunotherapy and diagnostic marker combined with NY-ESO-1. Virchows Archiv 2017;471:383–392. Clinical trial information: NCT04044768 .

HLA genotyping in synovial sarcoma: Identifying HLA-A*02 and its association with clinical outcome

e23560

Background: Patients (pts) with synovial sarcoma (SS) and an HLA-A*02 genotype whose tumors express NY-ESO-1 may be eligible for clinical trials of adoptive T cell therapy. We reasoned that a next generation tumor sequencing platform utilizing matched normal DNA (MSK-IMPACT) could accurately identify HLA genotype. Although HLA-A*02 is necessary for some adoptive T cell therapies, the prognosis of this genotype on clinical outcome has not been described in SS. Methods: Pts with metastatic SS who consented to screen for a clinical trial of engineered T cells had high-resolution HLA genotyping performed with a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified test. Where feasible, HLA genotype and loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) of HLA alleles were determined from IMPACT samples. Overall survival (OS) was estimated in three overlapping cohorts and stratified by HLA-A*02 status: pts treated with anthracyclines or alkylators in the first line, pazopanib in the second line or beyond, and all pts from time of metastasis. Results: 66 pts with SS were screened, but not treated with T cells; 30% (n = 20) were HLA-A*02-positive on a CLIA-certified outside test. 23 pts had HLA genotyping both by IMPACT and an outside laboratory, 22 (96%) of whom had concordant results. 3 pts had LOH of at least 1 HLA allele, including one with LOH of HLA*02:01 in the primary tumor. Among pts treated chemotherapy (n = 36) or pazopanib (n = 37), OS did not significantly differ between HLA-A*02-positive or negative pts. Univariable analyses of OS from the time of metastasis in the whole cohort identified primary tumor size and time to metastasis as variables significantly associated with outcome (hazard ratio (HR) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.123 – 1.345 [P < 0.001] and HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.976 – 0.999 [P = 0.032], respectively). HLA-A*02-positive status and age did not reach the significance threshold (HR 1.95, 95% CI 0.995 – 3.813 [P = 0.052] and HR 1.021, 95% CI 0.999 – 1.044 [P = 0.061], respectively). Multivariable analysis found older age and larger tumor size were independently associated with significantly shorter OS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.002 – 1.049 [P = 0.037] and HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.127 – 1.37 [P < 0.001], respectively). Conclusions: Targeted exome panels like IMPACT that utilize matched tumor-normal DNA may accurately identify HLA genotype. Detection of LOH at HLA loci may identify a subgroup of pts who would be refractory to treatment with HLA-A*02-restricted engineered T cells. HLA-A*02 status was not associated with a statistically significant survival difference in pts with metastatic SS.