26
|
Yuan J, Liu R, Sheng S, Fu H, Wang X. Untargeted LC-MS/MS-Based Metabolomic Profiling for the Edible and Medicinal Plant Salvia miltiorrhiza Under Different Levels of Cadmium Stress. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2022; 13:889370. [PMID: 35968141 PMCID: PMC9366474 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.889370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Salvia miltiorrhiza, a medicinal and edible plant, has been extensively applied to treat cardiovascular diseases and chronic hepatitis. Cadmium (Cd) affects the quality of S. miltiorrhiza, posing serious threats to human health. To reveal the metabolic mechanisms of S. miltiorrhiza's resistance to Cd stress, metabolite changes in S. miltiorrhiza roots treated with 0 (CK), 25 (T1), 50 (T2) and 100 (T3) mg kg-1 Cd by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were investigated. A total of 305 metabolites were identified, and most of them were amino acids, organic acids and fatty acids, which contributed to the discrimination of CK from the Cd-treated groups. Among them, S. miltiorrhiza mainly upregulated o-tyrosine, chorismate and eudesmic acid in resistance to 25 mg kg-1 Cd; DL-tryptophan, L-aspartic acid, L-proline and chorismite in resistance to 50 mg kg-1 Cd; and L-proline, L-serine, L-histidine, eudesmic acid, and rosmarinic acid in resistance to 100 mg kg-1 Cd. It mainly downregulated unsaturated fatty acids (e.g., oleic acid, linoleic acid) in resistance to 25, 50, and 100 mg kg-1 Cd and upregulated saturated fatty acids (especially stearic acid) in resistance to 100 mg kg-1 Cd. Biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, isoquinoline alkaloid, betalain, aminoacyl-tRNA, and tyrosine metabolism were the significantly enriched metabolic pathways and the most important pathways involved in the Cd resistance of S. miltiorrhiza. These data elucidated the crucial metabolic mechanisms involved in S. miltiorrhiza Cd resistance and the crucial metabolites that could be used to improve resistance to Cd stress in medicinal plant breeding.
Collapse
|
27
|
Aaij R, Abdelmotteleb ASW, Abellán Beteta C, Abudinén F, Ackernley T, Adeva B, Adinolfi M, Afsharnia H, Agapopoulou C, Aidala CA, Aiola S, Ajaltouni Z, Akar S, Albrecht J, Alessio F, Alexander M, Alfonso Albero A, Aliouche Z, Alkhazov G, Alvarez Cartelle P, Alves AA, Amato S, Amey JL, Amhis Y, An L, Anderlini L, Andersson N, Andreianov A, Andreotti M, Archilli F, Artamonov A, Artuso M, Arzymatov K, Aslanides E, Atzeni M, Audurier B, Bachmann S, Bachmayer M, Back JJ, Baladron Rodriguez P, Balagura V, Baldini W, Baptista Leite J, Barbetti M, Barlow RJ, Barsuk S, Barter W, Bartolini M, Baryshnikov F, Basels JM, Bashir S, Bassi G, Batsukh B, Battig A, Bay A, Beck A, Becker M, Bedeschi F, Bediaga I, Beiter A, Belavin V, Belin S, Bellee V, Belous K, Belov I, Belyaev I, Bencivenni G, Ben-Haim E, Berezhnoy A, Bernet R, Berninghoff D, Bernstein HC, Bertella C, Bertolin A, Betancourt C, Betti F, Bezshyiko I, Bhasin S, Bhom J, Bian L, Bieker MS, Biesuz NV, Bifani S, Billoir P, Biolchini A, Birch M, Bishop FCR, Bitadze A, Bizzeti A, Bjørn M, Blago MP, Blake T, Blanc F, Blusk S, Bobulska D, Boelhauve JA, Boente Garcia O, Boettcher T, Boldyrev A, Bondar A, Bondar N, Borghi S, Borisyak M, Borsato M, Borsuk JT, Bouchiba SA, Bowcock TJV, Boyer A, Bozzi C, Bradley MJ, Braun S, Brea Rodriguez A, Brodzicka J, Brossa Gonzalo A, Brundu D, Buonaura A, Buonincontri L, Burke AT, Burr C, Bursche A, Butkevich A, Butter JS, Buytaert J, Byczynski W, Cadeddu S, Cai H, Calabrese R, Calefice L, Cali S, Calladine R, Calvi M, Calvo Gomez M, Camargo Magalhaes P, Campana P, Campoverde Quezada AF, Capelli S, Capriotti L, Carbone A, Carboni G, Cardinale R, Cardini A, Carli I, Carniti P, Carus L, Carvalho Akiba K, Casais Vidal A, Caspary R, Casse G, Cattaneo M, Cavallero G, Celani S, Cerasoli J, Cervenkov D, Chadwick AJ, Chapman MG, Charles M, Charpentier P, Chatzikonstantinidis G, Chavez Barajas CA, Chefdeville M, Chen C, Chen S, Chernov A, Chobanova V, Cholak S, Chrzaszcz M, Chubykin A, Chulikov V, Ciambrone P, Cicala MF, Cid Vidal X, Ciezarek G, Clarke PEL, Clemencic M, Cliff HV, Closier J, Cobbledick JL, Coco V, Coelho JAB, Cogan J, Cogneras E, Cojocariu L, Collins P, Colombo T, Congedo L, Contu A, Cooke N, Coombs G, Corredoira I, Corti G, Costa Sobral CM, Couturier B, Craik DC, Crkovská J, Cruz Torres M, Currie R, Da Silva CL, Dadabaev S, Dai L, Dall'Occo E, Dalseno J, D'Ambrosio C, Danilina A, d'Argent P, Dashkina A, Davies JE, Davis A, De Aguiar Francisco O, De Bruyn K, De Capua S, De Cian M, De Lucia E, De Miranda JM, De Paula L, De Serio M, De Simone D, De Simone P, De Vellis F, de Vries JA, Dean CT, Debernardis F, Decamp D, Dedu V, Del Buono L, Delaney B, Dembinski HP, Dendek A, Denysenko V, Derkach D, Deschamps O, Desse F, Dettori F, Dey B, Di Canto A, Di Cicco A, Di Nezza P, Didenko S, Dieste Maronas L, Dijkstra H, Dobishuk V, Dong C, Donohoe AM, Dordei F, Dos Reis AC, Douglas L, Dovbnya A, Downes AG, Dudek MW, Dufour L, Duk V, Durante P, Durham JM, Dutta D, Dziurda A, Dzyuba A, Easo S, Egede U, Egorychev V, Eidelman S, Eisenhardt S, Ek-In S, Eklund L, Ely S, Ene A, Epple E, Escher S, Eschle J, Esen S, Evans T, Falcao LN, Fan Y, Fang B, Farry S, Fazzini D, Féo M, Fernandez Prieto A, Fernez AD, Ferrari F, Ferreira Lopes L, Ferreira Rodrigues F, Ferreres Sole S, Ferrillo M, Ferro-Luzzi M, Filippov S, Fini RA, Fiorini M, Firlej M, Fischer KM, Fitzgerald DS, Fitzpatrick C, Fiutowski T, Fkiaras A, Fleuret F, Fontana M, Fontanelli F, Forty R, Foulds-Holt D, Franco Lima V, Franco Sevilla M, Frank M, Franzoso E, Frau G, Frei C, Friday DA, Fu J, Fuehring Q, Gabriel E, Galati G, Gallas Torreira A, Galli D, Gambetta S, Gan Y, Gandelman M, Gandini P, Gao Y, Garau M, Garcia Martin LM, Garcia Moreno P, García Pardiñas J, Garcia Plana B, Garcia Rosales FA, Garrido L, Gaspar C, Geertsema RE, Gerick D, Gerken LL, Gersabeck E, Gersabeck M, Gershon T, Gerstel D, Giambastiani L, Gibson V, Giemza HK, Gilman AL, Giovannetti M, Gioventù A, Gironella Gironell P, Giugliano C, Gizdov K, Gkougkousis EL, Gligorov VV, Göbel C, Golobardes E, Golubkov D, Golutvin A, Gomes A, Gomez Fernandez S, Goncalves Abrantes F, Goncerz M, Gong G, Gorbounov P, Gorelov IV, Gotti C, Govorkova E, Grabowski JP, Grammatico T, Granado Cardoso LA, Graugés E, Graverini E, Graziani G, Grecu A, Greeven LM, Grieser NA, Grillo L, Gromov S, Gruberg Cazon BR, Gu C, Guarise M, Guittiere M, Günther PA, Gushchin E, Guth A, Guz Y, Gys T, Hadavizadeh T, Haefeli G, Haen C, Haimberger J, Halewood-Leagas T, Hamilton PM, Hammerich JP, Han Q, Han X, Hancock TH, Hansen EB, Hansmann-Menzemer S, Harnew N, Harrison T, Hasse C, Hatch M, He J, Hecker M, Heijhoff K, Heinicke K, Henderson RDL, Hennequin AM, Hennessy K, Henry L, Heuel J, Hicheur A, Hill D, Hilton M, Hollitt SE, Hou R, Hou Y, Hu J, Hu J, Hu W, Hu X, Huang W, Huang X, Hulsbergen W, Hunter RJ, Hushchyn M, Hutchcroft D, Hynds D, Ibis P, Idzik M, Ilin D, Ilten P, Inglessi A, Ishteev A, Ivshin K, Jacobsson R, Jage H, Jakobsen S, Jans E, Jashal BK, Jawahery A, Jevtic V, Jiang X, John M, Johnson D, Jones CR, Jones TP, Jost B, Jurik N, Kalavan Kadavath SH, Kandybei S, Kang Y, Karacson M, Karpov M, Kautz JW, Keizer F, Keller DM, Kenzie M, Ketel T, Khanji B, Kharisova A, Kholodenko S, Kirn T, Kirsebom VS, Kitouni O, Klaver S, Kleijne N, Klimaszewski K, Kmiec MR, Koliiev S, Kondybayeva A, Konoplyannikov A, Kopciewicz P, Kopecna R, Koppenburg P, Korolev M, Kostiuk I, Kot O, Kotriakhova S, Kravchenko P, Kravchuk L, Krawczyk RD, Kreps M, Kress F, Kretzschmar S, Krokovny P, Krupa W, Krzemien W, Kubat J, Kucharczyk M, Kudryavtsev V, Kuindersma HS, Kunde GJ, Kvaratskheliya T, Lacarrere D, Lafferty G, Lai A, Lampis A, Lancierini D, Lane JJ, Lane R, Lanfranchi G, Langenbruch C, Langer J, Lantwin O, Latham T, Lazzari F, Le Gac R, Lee SH, Lefèvre R, Leflat A, Legotin S, Leroy O, Lesiak T, Leverington B, Li H, Li P, Li S, Li Y, Li Y, Li Z, Liang X, Lin T, Lindner R, Lisovskyi V, Litvinov R, Liu G, Liu H, Liu Q, Liu S, Lobo Salvia A, Loi A, Lomba Castro J, Longstaff I, Lopes JH, López Soliño S, Lovell GH, Lu Y, Lucarelli C, Lucchesi D, Luchuk S, Lucio Martinez M, Lukashenko V, Luo Y, Lupato A, Luppi E, Lupton O, Lusiani A, Lyu X, Ma L, Ma R, Maccolini S, Machefert F, Maciuc F, Macko V, Mackowiak P, Maddrell-Mander S, Madejczyk O, Madhan Mohan LR, Maev O, Maevskiy A, Maisuzenko D, Majewski MW, Malczewski JJ, Malde S, Malecki B, Malinin A, Maltsev T, Malygina H, Manca G, Mancinelli G, Manuzzi D, Marangotto D, Maratas J, Marchand JF, Marconi U, Mariani S, Marin Benito C, Marinangeli M, Marks J, Marshall AM, Marshall PJ, Martelli G, Martellotti G, Martinazzoli L, Martinelli M, Martinez Santos D, Martinez Vidal F, Massafferri A, Materok M, Matev R, Mathad A, Matiunin V, Matteuzzi C, Mattioli KR, Mauri A, Maurice E, Mauricio J, Mazurek M, McCann M, Mcconnell L, Mcgrath TH, Mchugh NT, McNab A, McNulty R, Mead JV, Meadows B, Meier G, Meinert N, Melnychuk D, Meloni S, Merk M, Merli A, Meyer Garcia L, Mikhasenko M, Milanes DA, Millard E, Milovanovic M, Minard MN, Minotti A, Minzoni L, Mitchell SE, Mitreska B, Mitzel DS, Mödden A, Mohammed RA, Moise RD, Mokhnenko S, Mombächer T, Monroy IA, Monteil S, Morandin M, Morello G, Morello MJ, Moron J, Morris AB, Morris AG, Mountain R, Mu H, Muheim F, Mulder M, Müller D, Müller K, Murphy CH, Murray D, Murta R, Muzzetto P, Naik P, Nakada T, Nandakumar R, Nanut T, Nasteva I, Needham M, Neri N, Neubert S, Neufeld N, Newcombe R, Niel EM, Nieswand S, Nikitin N, Nolte NS, Normand C, Nunez C, Oblakowska-Mucha A, Obraztsov V, Oeser T, O'Hanlon DP, Okamura S, Oldeman R, Oliva F, Olivares ME, Onderwater CJG, O'Neil RH, Otalora Goicochea JM, Ovsiannikova T, Owen P, Oyanguren A, Padeken KO, Pagare B, Pais PR, Pajero T, Palano A, Palutan M, Pan Y, Panshin G, Papanestis A, Pappagallo M, Pappalardo LL, Pappenheimer C, Parker W, Parkes C, Passalacqua B, Passaleva G, Pastore A, Patel M, Patrignani C, Pawley CJ, Pearce A, Pellegrino A, Pepe Altarelli M, Perazzini S, Pereima D, Pereiro Castro A, Perret P, Petric M, Petridis K, Petrolini A, Petrov A, Petrucci S, Petruzzo M, Pham TTH, Philippov A, Piandani R, Pica L, Piccini M, Pietrzyk B, Pietrzyk G, Pili M, Pinci D, Pisani F, Pizzichemi M, P K R, Placinta V, Plews J, Plo Casasus M, Polci F, Poli Lener M, Poliakova M, Poluektov A, Polukhina N, Polyakov I, Polycarpo E, Ponce S, Popov D, Popov S, Poslavskii S, Prasanth K, Promberger L, Prouve C, Pugatch V, Puill V, Pullen H, Punzi G, Qi H, Qian W, Qin J, Qin N, Quagliani R, Quintana B, Raab NV, Rabadan Trejo RI, Rachwal B, Rademacker JH, Rama M, Ramos Pernas M, Rangel MS, Ratnikov F, Raven G, Reboud M, Redi F, Reiss F, Remon Alepuz C, Ren Z, Renaudin V, Ribatti R, Ricciardi S, Rinnert K, Robbe P, Robertson G, Rodrigues AB, Rodrigues E, Rodriguez Lopez JA, Rodriguez Rodriguez ERR, Rollings A, Roloff P, Romanovskiy V, Romero Lamas M, Romero Vidal A, Roth JD, Rotondo M, Rudolph MS, Ruf T, Ruiz Fernandez RA, Ruiz Vidal J, Ryzhikov A, Ryzka J, Saborido Silva JJ, Sagidova N, Sahoo N, Saitta B, Salomoni M, Sanchez Gras C, Santacesaria R, Santamarina Rios C, Santimaria M, Santovetti E, Saranin D, Sarpis G, Sarpis M, Sarti A, Satriano C, Satta A, Saur M, Savrina D, Sazak H, Scantlebury Smead LG, Scarabotto A, Schael S, Scherl S, Schiller M, Schindler H, Schmelling M, Schmidt B, Schmitt S, Schneider O, Schopper A, Schubiger M, Schulte S, Schune MH, Schwemmer R, Sciascia B, Sellam S, Semennikov A, Senghi Soares M, Sergi A, Serra N, Sestini L, Seuthe A, Shang Y, Shangase DM, Shapkin M, Shchemerov I, Shchutska L, Shears T, Shekhtman L, Shen Z, Sheng S, Shevchenko V, Shields EB, Shimizu Y, Shmanin E, Shupperd JD, Siddi BG, Silva Coutinho R, Simi G, Simone S, Skidmore N, Skwarnicki T, Slater MW, Slazyk I, Smallwood JC, Smeaton JG, Smetkina A, Smith E, Smith M, Snoch A, Soares Lavra L, Sokoloff MD, Soler FJP, Solovev A, Solovyev I, Souza De Almeida FL, Souza De Paula B, Spaan B, Spadaro Norella E, Spradlin P, Stagni F, Stahl M, Stahl S, Stanislaus S, Steinkamp O, Stenyakin O, Stevens H, Stone S, Strekalina D, Suljik F, Sun J, Sun L, Sun Y, Svihra P, Swallow PN, Swientek K, Szabelski A, Szumlak T, Szymanski M, Taneja S, Tanner AR, Tat MD, Terentev A, Teubert F, Thomas E, Thompson DJD, Thomson KA, Tilquin H, Tisserand V, T'Jampens S, Tobin M, Tomassetti L, Tong X, Torres Machado D, Tou DY, Trifonova E, Trilov SM, Trippl C, Tuci G, Tully A, Tuning N, Ukleja A, Unverzagt DJ, Ursov E, Usachov A, Ustyuzhanin A, Uwer U, Vagner A, Vagnoni V, Valassi A, Valenti G, Valls Canudas N, van Beuzekom M, Van Dijk M, Van Hecke H, van Herwijnen E, van Veghel M, Vazquez Gomez R, Vazquez Regueiro P, Vázquez Sierra C, Vecchi S, Velthuis JJ, Veltri M, Venkateswaran A, Veronesi M, Vesterinen M, Vieira D, Vieites Diaz M, Viemann H, Vilasis-Cardona X, Vilella Figueras E, Villa A, Vincent P, Volle FC, Vom Bruch D, Vorobyev A, Vorobyev V, Voropaev N, Vos K, Waldi R, Walsh J, Wang C, Wang J, Wang J, Wang J, Wang J, Wang M, Wang R, Wang Y, Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang Z, Ward JA, Watson NK, Weber SG, Websdale D, Weisser C, Westhenry BDC, White DJ, Whitehead M, Wiederhold AR, Wiedner D, Wilkinson G, Wilkinson M, Williams I, Williams M, Williams MRJ, Wilson FF, Wislicki W, Witek M, Witola L, Wormser G, Wotton SA, Wu H, Wyllie K, Xiang Z, Xiao D, Xie Y, Xu A, Xu J, Xu L, Xu M, Xu Q, Xu Z, Xu Z, Yang D, Yang S, Yang Y, Yang Z, Yang Z, Yao Y, Yeomans LE, Yin H, Yu J, Yuan X, Yushchenko O, Zaffaroni E, Zavertyaev M, Zdybal M, Zenaiev O, Zeng M, Zhang D, Zhang L, Zhang S, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zharkova A, Zhelezov A, Zheng Y, Zhou T, Zhou X, Zhou Y, Zhovkovska V, Zhu X, Zhu X, Zhu Z, Zhukov V, Zonneveld JB, Zou Q, Zucchelli S, Zuliani D, Zunica G. Angular Analysis of D^{0}→π^{+}π^{-}μ^{+}μ^{-} and D^{0}→K^{+}K^{-}μ^{+}μ^{-} Decays and Search for CP Violation. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2022; 128:221801. [PMID: 35714260 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.221801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The first full angular analysis and an updated measurement of the decay-rate CP asymmetry of the D^{0}→π^{+}π^{-}μ^{+}μ^{-} and D^{0}→K^{+}K^{-}μ^{+}μ^{-} decays are reported. The analysis uses proton-proton collision data collected with the LHCb detector at center-of-mass energies of 7, 8, and 13 TeV. The dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 9 fb^{-1}. The full set of CP -averaged angular observables and their CP asymmetries are measured as a function of the dimuon invariant mass. The results are consistent with expectations from the standard model and with CP symmetry.
Collapse
|
28
|
Mease PJ, Gottlieb AB, Mcinnes I, Rahman P, Kollmeier A, Xu XL, Jiang Y, Sheng S, Shawi M, Chakravarty SD, Lavie F, Van der Heijde D. POS1035 LOW RATES OF RADIOGRAPHIC PROGRESSION WITH 2 YEARS OF GUSELKUMAB, A SELECTIVE INHIBITOR OF THE INTERLEUKIN-23p19 SUBUNIT: RESULTS FROM A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF BIOLOGIC-NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundIn the phase 3 DISCOVER-2 (D2) study, guselkumab (GUS) 100 mg every 4/8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W) significantly improved joint and skin symptoms in patients (pts) with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA); GUS-treated pts had smaller mean changes in radiographic progression vs placebo (PBO) at W24.1 Clinical response rates and favorable safety profile were durable through W100.2, 3ObjectivesTo report details of radiographic assessments comprising Reading Session 3 through W100 of D2, including relationships between radiographic changes and measures of clinical outcomes.MethodsBiologic-naïve adults with active PsA (≥5 swollen + ≥5 tender joint count; CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL) were randomized (1:1:1) to GUS 100 mg Q4W; GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, then Q8W; or PBO with crossover to GUS 100 mg Q4W (PBO→Q4W) at W24, all through W100. Radiographic Reading Session 3 included assessments at W0/24/52/100 (or at discontinuation after W52) from pts ontinuing study treatment at W52; readers were blinded to treatment group and timepoint. Observed mean changes in total PsA-modified van der Heijde-Sharp (vdH-S), joint space narrowing (JSN), and erosion scores were reported. Changes in total vdH-S scores from W0-100 were determined in pts who did and did not achieve clinical response at W100, assessed by ACR20/50/70, low disease activity (LDA) based on Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis score (DAPSA; ≤14) or Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS; ≤3.2), minimal disease activity (MDA), and normalized Health-Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score (<0.5).ResultsOf 739 randomized pts, 664 had evaluable data from Reading Session 3; 629 had evaluable data from W52-100. Mean total baseline vdH-S scores were: Q4W, 28.0; Q8W, 23.9; PBO→Q4W, 25.6. Mean progression of joint damage from W0-24 was numerically lower in GUS- than PBO-treated pts for erosion, JSN, and total vdH-S scores (Table 1), consistent with the results from Reading Session 1.1 Mean changes in radiographic scores from W52-100 indicated low rates of radiographic progression across GUS groups. Among GUS-randomized pts, mean changes in vdH-S score from W0-100 were numerically lower for pts achieving clinical response assessed using ACR20/50/70, DAPSA LDA, PASDAS LDA, MDA, and HAQ-DI vs pts not achieving response at W100 (Figure 1).Table 1.Observed erosion, joint space narrowing, and total PsA-modified vdH-S scores through W100 of DISCOVER-2GUS Q4WGUS Q8WPBO→GUS Q4WBaseline PsA-modified vdH-S score, n221228215Erosion14.2 (23.3)12.0 (21.9)12.1 (21.9)Joint space narrowing13.8 (21.8)11.9 (19.5)13.5 (21.6)Total28.0 (43.6)23.9 (40.4)25.6 (42.4)Mean (SD) change in PsA-modified vdH-S scoreW0-24 N=221W24-52 N=221W52-100 N=211W0-24 N=228W24-52 N=228W52-100 N=216W0-24 N=215W24-52 N=213W52-100 N=202Erosion0.27 (1.91)0.36 (1.77)0.45 (2.90)0.51 (1.96)0.20 (1.24)0.26 (1.75)0.73 (2.20)0.25 (1.85)0.09 (1.98)Joint space narrowing0.21 (1.17)0.21 (1.11)0.30 (1.32)0.17 (0.69)0.12 (0.66)0.20 (0.92)0.39 (1.72)0.09 (1.11)0.04 (1.90)Total0.48 (2.70)0.57 (2.66)0.75 (4.02)0.68 (2.36)0.31 (1.57)0.46 (2.42)1.12 (3.80)0.34 (2.79)0.13 (3.74)Data presented as mean (SD).GUS, guselkumab; PBO, placebo; PsA, Psoriatic Arthritis; Q4W, every 4 weeks; Q8W, every 8 weeks; SD, standard deviation; vdH-S, van der Heijde-Sharp; W, weekConclusionIn biologic-naïve pts with active PsA enriched for greater risk of radiographic progression, GUS 100 mg (Q4W or Q8W) was associated with low rates of radiographic progression through 2 years. Pts achieving clinical response across several global measures of disease activity or normalized physical function at W100 had lower mean changes in total PsA-modified vdH-S scores compared with nonresponders.References[1]Mease PJ. Lancet. 2020;395:1126-1136[2]McInnes IB. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73:604-616[3]McInnes IB. Innovations in Dermatology. Presentation: March 16-20, 2021Disclosure of InterestsPhilip J Mease Consultant of: AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Inmagene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Inmagene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB, Alice B Gottlieb Shareholder of: Xbiotech (stock options only), Consultant of: Anaptyps Bio, Avotres Therapeutics, Beiersdorf, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB, and Xbiotech, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Proton Rahman Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Janssen and Novartis, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Yusang Jiang Employee of: Cytel, Inc., Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, May Shawi Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, Soumya D Chakravarty Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Frederic Lavie Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and UCB Pharma, Employee of: Director of Imaging and Rheumatology BV
Collapse
|
29
|
Nash P, Tam LS, Tsai WC, Leung YY, Furtner D, Sheng S, Wang Y, Shawi M, Kollmeier A, Sherlock J, Cua D. POS1044 GUSELKUMAB PROVIDES CONSISTENT AND DURABLE PAIN IMPROVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: RESULTS OF 2 PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.2030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundGuselkumab (GUS), an anti-IL23p19-subunit mAb, demonstrated significant efficacy vs placebo (PBO) in achieving ACR20 response at week (W) 24 in patients (pts) with active PsA in phase 3 trials, DISCOVER-1&2 (D1&2).1,2 Pts with PsA report pain relief as a treatment priority.3ObjectivesTo assess GUS treatment effect through 2 years on pt-reported pain across outcome measures.MethodsPts with active PsA in D1 (n=381; 31% received 1-2 prior TNFi) and D2 (n=739; biologic-naïve) were randomized (1:1:1) to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, then Q8W; or PBO with crossover to GUS 100 mg Q4W at W24 (PBO→Q4W). Pts rated pain using visual analog scale (VAS; 0-10; Pt Pain) and reported Bodily Pain intensity over past 4 W via 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey question 21 (0-5). Pts with spondylitis and peripheral arthritis at baseline (BL) rated Spinal and Joint Pain (0-10). Observed mean change, % improvement from BL in tender (TJC; 0-68) and swollen joint counts (SJC; 0-66), and proportion of pts achieving ≥20/≥50% improvement in Pt Pain (nonresponder imputation [NRI]) were evaluated.ResultsIn D2, mean BL for Bodily Pain (range: 4.4-4.5), Pt Pain (6.2-6.3), Spinal Pain (6.5-6.7), Joint Pain (6.3-6.8), SJC (11.7-12.9) and TJC (19.8-22.4) indicated moderate pain and disease activity at study outset. GUS-treated pts reported ~2x improvement in Pt Pain, Spinal Pain, Joint Pain, and Bodily Pain intensity at W24 vs PBO, which were maintained or increased at W52 and W100. PBO→Q4W pts had similar improvements. Pt-reported pain appeared more sensitive to treatment effect, with larger differences in % improvement vs PBO than physician-reported TJC/SJC at W24. D1 showed consistent results through 1 year. In 748 GUS-treated pts across D1&2, substantial proportions achieved meaningful improvement in Pt Pain at early time points: 32% (W4) and 48% (W8) achieved ≥20% improvement; 28% (W12) and 33% (W16) achieved ≥50% improvement. At W24, 63%/39% reported ≥20%/≥50% improvement in pain.ConclusionGUS provided consistent and durable improvements in pt-reported pain across several outcome measures. Pt-reported pain as an early and sensitive indicator of treatment effect in pts with active PsA and additional factors merits further evaluation.References[1]Deodhar A et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1115-25[2]Mease P et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1126-36[3]Gudu T et al. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018;14:405-17Table 1.Observed Mean (SD) Change from Baseline in Pain Scores, TJC, and SJC at W24, W52, and W100 in DISCOVER-2W24W52W100GUS Q4WGUS Q8WPBOGUS Q4WGUS Q8WPBO→Q4WGUS Q4WGUS Q8WPBO→Q4WPt Pain (0-10),* N240243243229234231220224215-2.39 (2.35)-2.53 (2.47)-1.08 (2.42)-2.89 (2.68)-3.20 (2.56)-2.75 (2.66)-3.52 (2.62)-3.69 (2.63)-3.41 (2.58)Spinal Pain (0-10), +N806592796488766182-2.26 (2.57)-2.54 (2.70)-1.13 (2.48)-2.74 (2.63)-2.67 (2.71)-2.65 (2.69)-3.11 (2.67)-3.44 (2.71)-3.37 (2.66)Joint Pain (0-10),+N806592796488766182-2.88 (2.17)-2.90 (2.68)-1.40 (2.91)-3.32 (2.27)-3.21 (2.76)-3.42 (2.92)-3.54 (2.35)-3.61 (2.77)-3.80 (2.95)SF-36 (Q21; 0-5), N240243242229234230220224214-0.99 (1.03)-1.03 (1.12)-0.50 (1.11)-1.18 (1.33)-1.29 (1.17)-1.10 (1.16)-1.39 (1.25)-1.47 (1.38)-1.36 (1.27)TJC (0-68), N240243243228234231220224213-11.85(9.88)-10.37(9.49)-7.26(11.15)-15.04(10.51)-13.44(10.03)-14.15(11.39)-16.37(10.70)-15.27(11.10)-16.29(11.27)SJC (0-66), N240243243228234231220224213-8.77(5.46)-8.14(6.07)-6.44(7.20)-10.38(6.17)-9.56(6.28)-10.17(6.79)-10.83(6.66)-10.20(6.88)-10.58(6.15)*ACR, DAPSA, MDA: VAS 0-10; +BASDAI: VAS 0-10ACR=American College of Rheumatology; BASDAI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; DAPSA=Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis; GUS=guselkumab; MDA=minimal disease activity; PBO=placebo; pt=patient; Q=question; QxW=every x week; SD=standard deviation; SF-36=36-Item Short-Form Survey; SJC=swollen joint count; TJC=tender joint count; VAS=visual analog scale; W=weekDisclosure of InterestsPeter Nash Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, and Sun Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, and Sun Pharma, Lai-Shan Tam Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, and Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer, Wen-Chan Tsai Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Janssen, Ying Ying Leung Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Novartis and on advisory board for Janssen, Daniel Furtner Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen, a division of Johnson & Johnson Pte. Ltd, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Yanli Wang Consultant of: Janssen, Employee of: Cytel, Inc., May Shawi Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Jonathan Sherlock Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Daniel Cua Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC
Collapse
|
30
|
Mease PJ, Foley P, Reich K, Chakravarty SD, Shawi M, Yang YW, Miller M, Kollmeier A, Xu XL, Yu J, Wang Y, Sheng S, You Y, Mcinnes I. AB0892 Targeted Safety Analyses of Guselkumab: Long-Term Results from Randomized Clinical Trials in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis and Moderate to Severe Psoriasis. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundGuselkumab (GUS) demonstrated efficacy and a favorable safety profile in active PsA in the Phase (Ph) 21 and Ph3 DISCOVER-1&2 trials2,3 and in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) in the Ph3 VOYAGE-1&2 trials.4,5ObjectivesTo assess long-term safety of GUS across PsA/PsO trials.MethodsUsing pooled safety data through 2 years (yrs) from PsA trials (N=1229; GUS 100 mg every 4/8 weeks [Q4W/Q8W])1-3 and through 5 yrs from PsO trials (N=1721; GUS 100 mg Q8W),4,5 incidences of serious adverse events (SAEs); gastrointestinal (GI)-related SAEs and other targeted AEs; including candidiasis, uveitis, and opportunistic infections (OIs) were evaluated. Incidence rates (IRs) were calculated as the number of events per 100 pt-yrs (PY) of follow-up with 95% CI. Patients (pts) with an IBD history were not excluded in PsA/PsO trials. Max exposure duration was W100 for PsA trials and W252 for PsO trials.ResultsThe PsA and PsO populations had comparable mean age and BMI. IRs of SAEs and GI-related SAEs were generally similar between GUS- and PBO-treated pts during PBO-controlled periods, and between PsA pts receiving GUS Q4W/Q8W for up to 2 yrs and PsO pts receiving GUS Q8W for up to 5 yrs (Table 1). IRs of other targeted AEs of interest were low. OIs did not occur in PsO pts and were infrequent in PsA pts (Table 1). Candidal infections were infrequent and non-serious. Iridocyclitis was reported in 1 PBO- and 1 GUS Q8W-treated PsA pt. No exacerbations or new onset of IBD or active tuberculosis was reported in GUS-treated PsA/PsO pts.Table 1.Targeted AEs of InterestPooled PsA*Pooled PsOThrough 2 YrsThrough 5 YrsGUS 100 mg Q4W (N=373)GUS 100 mg Q8W (N=475)PBO→GUS 100 mg Q4W (N=352)aPBO→GUS 100 mg Q8W (N=29)aGUS Combined (N=1229)GUS 100 mg Q8W (N=1221)bADA→GUS 100 mg Q8W (N=500)cGUS Combined (N=1721)Total PY645748461171871525419127166Mean PY1.71.61.30.61.54.33.84.2Events/100 PY (95% CI)Overall SAEs4.65(3.14, 6.64)6.42(4.73, 8.51)5.86(3.86, 8.52)0.00(0.00, 17.24)5.61(4.59, 6.79)5.18(4.58, 5.83)4.55(3.64, 5.61)5.01(4.50, 5.56)GI-related SAEs0.46(0.10, 1.36)0.27(0.03, 0.97)0.00 (0.00, 0.65)0.00(0.00, 17.24)0.27(0.09, 0.62)0.44(0.28, 0.66)0.42(0.18, 0.82)0.43(0.29, 0.61)OIsd0.00(0.00, 0.46)0.27(0.03, 0.97)0.22(0.01, 1.21)0.00(0.00, 17.24)0.16(0.03, 0.47)0.00(0.00, 0.06)0.00(0.00, 0.16)0.00(0.00, 0.04)Candida infections0.31(0.04, 1.12)0.00(0.00, 0.40)0.00(0.00, 0.65)0.00(0.00, 17.24)0.11(0.01, 0.39)0.49(0.32, 0.73)0.52(0.25, 0.96)0.50(0.35, 0.70)Non-pathogen specific fungal infections, suspicious for candida0.00(0.00, 0.46)0.27(0.03, 0.97)0.00(0.00, 0.65)0.00(0.00, 17.24)0.11(0.01, 0.39)0.11(0.04, 0.25)0.16(0.03, 0.46)0.13(0.06, 0.24)Uveitis/ Iridocyclitis0.00(0.00, 0.46)0.13(0.00, 0.75)0.00(0.00, 0.65)0.00(0.00, 17.24)0.05(0.00, 0.30)0.00(0.00, 0.06)0.00(0.00, 0.16)0.00(0.00, 0.04)*In PsA Ph2, data after early escape at W16 were excluded. AEs are coded using MedDRA Version 23.1aFor PBO→GUS, data on/after 1st GUS administration were includedbPBO crossover pts were included in GUS column after crossover to GUScEvents prior to GUS (ADA events) were excluded. Only includes pts randomized to ADA at W0 and crossed over to GUS at/after W52 for VOYAGE-1 & W28 for VOYAGE-2dHerpes zoster disseminated, fungal oesophagitis, and meningitis listeria (1 each)ADA=AdalimumabConclusionIRs of SAEs; GI-related SAEs; and AEs of interest including candidiasis, uveitis, and OIs were low, or no cases were reported. No new safety concerns were identified with GUS treatment through 2 yrs and 5 yrs of follow-up in the pooled PsA and PsO trials, respectively, supporting a durable and favorable GUS safety profile consistent between pts with active PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO.References[1]Deodhar A, et al. Lancet. 2018;391:2213-2224.[2]Deodhar A, et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1115-1125.[3]Mease PJ, et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1126-1136.[4]Blauvelt A, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:405-417.[5]Reich K, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:418-431.Disclosure of InterestsPhilip J Mease Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Celgene, Crescendo Bioscience, Genentech, Inmagene, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Celgene, Crescendo Bioscience, Genentech, Inmagene, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Celgene, Crescendo Bioscience, Genentech, Inmagene, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB, Peter Foley Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Valeant, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Leo Pharma, and Roche, Paid instructor for: (Advisory boards) AbbVie, Amgen, Aslan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, Valeant, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Leo Pharma, and Sanofi, Consultant of: Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Galderma, Leo Pharma, and Roche; investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Arcutis, Aslan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Hexima, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, Valeant, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celtaxsys, CSL, Cutanea, Dermira, Galderma, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Leo Pharma, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Reistone, Roche, and Sanofi, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma; travel grants from AbbVie, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Galderma, Leo Pharma, Roche, Sun Pharma, and Sanofi; served as speaker for or received honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Valeant, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Leo Pharma, and Roche, Kristian Reich Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Affibody, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Covagen, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Leo, Medac, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis, Ocean Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma, and Xenoport, Paid instructor for: Abbvie, Affibody, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Covagen, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Leo, Medac, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis, Ocean Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma, and Xenoport, Consultant of: Participated in clinical trials sponsored by Abbvie, Affibody, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Covagen, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Leo, Medac, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis, Ocean Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma, and Xenoport, Soumya D Chakravarty Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC and may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, May Shawi Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC and may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Ya-Wen Yang Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC and may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Megan Miller Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC and may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Alexa Kollmeier Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC and may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Xie L Xu Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC and may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Jenny Yu Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC and may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Yanli Wang Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC and may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Shihong Sheng Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC and may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Yin You Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC and may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis and UCB., Grant/research support from: Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and UCB
Collapse
|
31
|
Mease PJ, Helliwell P, Gladman DD, Poddubnyy D, Baraliakos X, Chakravarty SD, Kollmeier A, Xu XL, Sheng S, Xu S, Shawi M, Van der Heijde D, Deodhar A. POS1037 EFFECT OF GUSELKUMAB, A SELECTIVE IL-23p19 INHIBITOR, ON AXIAL-RELATED ENDPOINTS IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PsA: RESULTS FROM A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY THROUGH 2 YEARS. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundGuselkumab (GUS), a selective IL-23p19 inhibitor, showed greater mean improvements in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores vs placebo (PBO) at Week (W) 24 in patients (pts) with active PsA and investigator-confirmed sacroiliitis in pooled post hoc analyses of data from phase 3 DISCOVER (D)-1&2 trials. Improvements in symptoms of axial involvement were maintained through 1 year.1ObjectivesTo assess maintenance of GUS effect on symptoms of axial involvement in biologic-naïve PsA pts with investigator-confirmed sacroiliitis through 2 years of D-2.MethodsIn D-2, 739 bio-naïve pts with active PsA (≥5 swollen + ≥5 tender joints, CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL despite standard therapies) were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100 mg every 4W (Q4W; n=245), GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, then Q8W (n=248), or PBO (n=246) with PBO→GUS 100 mg Q4W at W24. Pts with investigator-identified axial symptoms and sacroiliitis (prior X-ray or MRI, or pelvic X-ray at screening) were evaluated. Efficacy was assessed by changes in BASDAI, modified BASDAI (mBASDAI, excluding Q3 [peripheral joint pain]), and BASDAI Q2 (Spinal Pain) scores, and proportions of pts achieving BASDAI 50, Spinal Pain score ≤2, and AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) responses through W100. Through W24, pts who met treatment failure criteria or had missing data were considered nonresponders. After W24, missing data were imputed as nonresponse for binary endpoints or no change from baseline for continuous endpoints (nonresponder imputation [NRI]). Axial-related outcomes were also summarized by HLA-B27 status (+/-).Results246 pts had investigator-confirmed sacroiliitis. Baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups (62% male; mean age 44.4 years; mean BASDAI scores 6.5-6.6). At W24, LS mean/mean changes in BASDAI (-2.4/-2.6) and ASDAS (-1.3/-1.5) scores were greater in GUS- vs PBO-treated pts. Improvements were maintained through W100 in GUS-treated pts: BASDAI, -3.1; Spinal Pain, -3.1; mBASDAI, -3.1; ASDAS, -1.7. Response patterns were similar for BASDAI 50 response rates in GUS-treated pts (W24 38-40%; W100 49-54%). At W24, GUS-treated pts had higher response rates for achievement of ASDAS inactive disease, major improvement, and clinically important improvement vs PBO; response rates (NRI) were maintained, or in some cases further increased, at 2 years. Results were consistent for achievement of ASDAS LDA and Spinal Pain score ≤2 (data not shown). GUS-related improvements in axial symptoms through W100 were generally consistent in HLA-B27+/- pts (data not shown).ConclusionIn bio-naïve pts with active PsA and investigator-confirmed sacroiliitis, GUS provided durable improvements in axial symptoms through W100, with substantial proportions of pts achieving and maintaining clinically meaningful improvements.References[1]Mease PJ et al. Lancet Rheumatol 2021;3:e715-723Table 1.Axial symptom assessments through W100 in PsA pts with investigator-confirmed sacroiliitis in DISCOVER-2 (NRI)GUS Q4W N=82GUS Q8W N=68PBO→GUS Q4W N=96Change in BASDAI scoreW24, LS mean (95% CI)-2.5 (-2.9, -2.0)-2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)-1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)Mean (SD)-2.5 (2.0)-2.6 (2.4)-1.4 (2.4)W52, mean (SD)-2.9 (2.3)-2.7 (2.5)-2.9 (2.6)W100, mean (SD)-3.0 (2.3)-3.1 (2.6)-3.3 (2.6)Change in mBASDAI (excludes Q3) scoreW24, LS mean (95% CI)-2.4 (-2.9, -1.9)-2.4 (-2.9, -1.8)-1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)Mean (SD)-2.5 (2.1)-2.6 (2.5)-1.3 (2.3)W52, mean (SD)-2.7 (2.6)-2.6 (2.5)-2.9 (2.4)W100, mean (SD)-3.3 (2.6)-3.1 (2.6)-3.0 (2.4)Change in Spinal Pain (BASDAI Q2) scoreW24, LS mean (95% CI)-2.2 (-2.7, -1.7)-2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)-0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)Mean (SD)-2.3 (2.6)-2.5 (2.8)-1.1 (2.5)W52, mean (SD)-2.6 (2.7)-2.5 (2.7)-2.5 (2.7)W100, mean (SD)-2.8 (2.7)-3.1 (2.8)-3.0 (2.8)Change in ASDAS scoreW24, LS mean (95% CI)-1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)-1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)-0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)Mean (SD)-1.4 (1.0)-1.5 (1.2)-0.7 (1.1)W52, mean (SD)-1.5 (1.1)-1.5 (1.3)-1.5 (1.3)W100, mean (SD)-1.6 (1.2)-1.7 (1.2)-1.6 (1.2)Disclosure of InterestsPhilip J Mease Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Inmagene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Inmagene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Inmagene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB, Philip Helliwell Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Janssen, and Novartis, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Pfizer, Dafna D Gladman Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Denis Poddubnyy Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, MDS, Novartis, and Pfizer, Xenofon Baraliakos Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biocad, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biocad, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Biocad, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Soumya D Chakravarty Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Stephen Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, May Shawi Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and UCB Pharma, Employee of: Imaging Rheumatology BV, Atul Deodhar Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Glaxo Smith & Kline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith & Kline, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB
Collapse
|
32
|
Rahman P, Boehncke WH, Mease PJ, Gottlieb AB, Mcinnes I, Neuhold M, Shawi M, Wang Y, Sheng S, Bergmans P, Kollmeier A, Theander E, Yu J, Leibowitz E, Marrache M, Coates L. POS1015 SAFETY OF GUSELKUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS WHO ARE BIO-NAÏVE OR TNFi-EXPERIENCED: POOLED RESULTS FROM 4 RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS THROUGH 2 YEARS. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundGuselkumab (GUS), a selective IL-23p19 subunit inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and a favorable safety profile in active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the Phase (Ph)21, Ph3 (DISCOVER [D]-1&2)2,3, and Ph3b COSMOS4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs).ObjectivesAssess GUS safety through 2 years (Y) in biologic (bio)-naïve and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-experienced (exp) active PsA patients (pts) pooled across 4 RCTs (Week [W] 56: Ph2 and COSMOS; W60: D1; W112: D2).MethodsEligible pts in COSMOS had inadequate response to 1 or 2 prior TNFi; 9% of Ph2 pts and 30% of D1 pts had 1 or 2 prior TNFi; D2 pts were bio-naïve. Incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) are summarized among all treated pts for the placebo (PBO)-controlled (W0-24) and active treatment periods through 2Y (max duration of exposure 100 W) according to actual treatment received, calculated as the number of events per 100 pt-Y of follow-up (PY), along with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Gastrointestinal (GI)-related serious AEs (SAEs) were identified using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system-organ class; major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; predefined as MI, Stroke, or CV death) and opportunistic infections (OIs) were identified through medical review.ResultsAcross the 4 RCTs, 1508 pts with active PsA received GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or Q8W and were followed for a median of 1.2 Y, representing 2125 PY. In the overall population (N=1554), which includes PBO-treated pts that discontinued study agent prior to W24, 1138 pts were bio-naïve and 416 pts were TNFi-exp. Among all treated pts, the overall GUS safety profile was generally consistent with that of PBO through W24; rates remained low through 2Y of GUS (Table 1). The GUS safety profile was similar to that observed with PBO within the bio-naïve and TNFi-exp cohorts through W24. Incidence rates of AEs were generally consistent between cohorts in GUS-treated pts; whereas, TNFi-exp PBO-treated pts had more SAEs, study agent d/c due to AEs, and serious infections than bio-naïve PBO pts (Figure).Table 1.Overall Treatment-emergent AEsPBO-controlled (W0-24)aThrough up to 2YPBOb(N=517)GUS Q8W (N=664)GUS Q4W (N=373)Combined GUS (N=1037)GUS Q8W (N=664)GUS Q4W (N=373)Combined GUSc(N=1508)Total (median) PY230 (0.5)305 (0.5)172 (0.5)478 (0.5)941 (1.1)645 (2.1)2125 (1.2)Events/100 PY (95% CI)AEs223 (204, 243)233 (216, 250)223 (201, 246)229 (216, 243)164 (156, 172)139 (130, 148)146 (141, 151)SAEs8.7 (5.3, 13)4.9 (2.8, 8.1)5.2 (2.4, 9.9)5.0 (3.2, 7.5)6.4 (4.9, 8.2)4.7 (3.1, 6.6)5.7 (4.7, 6.8)AEs leading to study agent d/c4.4 (2.1, 8.0)3.6 (1.8, 6.5)7.0 (3.6, 12.2)4.8 (3.1, 7.2)2.6 (1.6, 3.8)2.9 (1.8, 4.6)2.7 (2.1, 3.5)Infections59 (50, 70)56 (48, 65)57 (47, 70)57 (50, 64)43 (38, 47)37 (33, 42)39 (36, 42)Serious Infections2.2 (0.71, 5.1)0.33 (0.01, 1.8)1.7 (0.36, 5.1)0.84 (0.23, 2.1)1.7 (0.97, 2.8)0.77 (0.25, 1.8)1.5 (1.0, 2.1)Malignancy0.44 (0.01, 2.4)0.98 (0.20, 2.9)0.00 (0.00, 1.7)0.63 (0.13, 1.8)0.42 (0.12, 1.1)0.00 (0.00, 0.46)0.28 (0.10, 0.61)MACE0.44 (0.01, 2.4)0.33 (0.01, 1.8)0.58 (0.01, 3.2)0.42 (0.05, 1.5)0.21 (0.03, 0.77)0.46 (0.10, 1.4)0.24 (0.08, 0.55)GI-related SAEs1.3 (0.27, 3.8)0.33 (0.01, 1.8)0.00 (0.00, 1.7)0.21 (0.01, 1.2)0.32 (0.07, 0.93)0.46 (0.10, 1.4)0.28 (0.10, 0.61)OIs0.00 (0.00, 1.3)0.00 (0.00, 0.98)0.00 (0.00, 1.7)0.00 (0.00, 0.63)0.21 (0.03, 0.77)0.00 (0.00, 0.46)0.14 (0.03, 0.41)MedDRA Version 23.1.a Includes safety follow-up data through 2Y for pts who d/c study agent prior to W24 and did not receive any study agent at or after W24.b Includes data prior to GUS in PBO pts who switched from PBO to GUS.c Includes PBO to GUS cross-over at W24.ConclusionThe favorable GUS safety profile demonstrated through W24 persisted through 2Y across bio-naïve and TNFi-exp pts.References[1]Deodhar A, et al. Lancet. 2018;391:2213-2224.[2]Deodhar A, et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1115-1125.[3]Mease PJ, et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1126-1136.[4]Coates LC, et al. ARD. 2021;80:140-141. OP0230.Disclosure of InterestsProton Rahman Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Janssen and Novartis, Wolf-Henning Boehncke Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Almirall, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Novartis, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Almirall, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Novartis, and UCB, Philip J Mease Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Inmagene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB, Alice B Gottlieb Consultant of: AnaptsysBio, Avotres Therapeutics, Beiersdorf, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., UCB, and Dermavant, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, UCB, Xbiotech, and Sun Pharma, Iain McInnes Shareholder of: Causeway Therapeutics and Evelo Compugen, Consultant of: Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Cabaletta, Compugen, GSK, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Roche, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, and UCB, Marlies Neuhold Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, May Shawi Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Yanli Wang Consultant of: Janssen, Employee of: IQVIA, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Paul Bergmans Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Biostatistics, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Elke Theander Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Jenny Yu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Evan Leibowitz Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Marilise Marrache Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Medical Affairs, Janssen Inc., Laura Coates Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB
Collapse
|
33
|
Rahman P, Mcinnes I, Deodhar A, Schett G, Mease PJ, Shawi M, Cua D, Sherlock J, Kollmeier A, Xu XL, Jiang Y, Sheng S, Ritchlin CT, Mcgonagle D. POS1028 GUSELKUMAB MAINTAINS RESOLUTION OF DACTYLITIS AND ENTHESITIS IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: RESULTS THROUGH 2 YEARS FROM A PHASE 3 STUDY. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundGuselkumab (GUS), a selective inhibitor of IL-23, significantly improved the diverse manifestations of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), including dactylitis and enthesitis, in DISCOVER (D)-1 & 2 trials of patients (pts) with active PsA1,2, with maintenance of response rates through 1 year (yr).3,4 Dactylitis and enthesitis, extra-articular manifestations of PsA, can be difficult to treat and cause significant disease burden.5,6ObjectivesTo evaluate the ability of GUS to provide long-term resolution of dactylitis and enthesitis in pts with PsA through 2 yrs of D-2.MethodsD-2 biologic naïve pts with active PsA were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, Q8W; or placebo (PBO). At W24, PBO pts crossed over to GUS Q4W. Independent assessors evaluated dactylitis (total score: 0-60) and enthesitis (Leeds Enthesitis Index [LEI]; total score 0-6). These post hoc analyses assessed baseline (BL) frequency and severity of enthesitis in pts with dactylitis and dactylitis frequency in pts with enthesitis. Post BL, changes in dactylitis and LEI scores over time (least squares [LS] mean changes; analysis of covariance [ANCOVA]) and rates of resolution of dactylitis and enthesitis (Chi square correlation test) were determined in pts with these manifestations at BL (missing data imputed as no change/response).ResultsAt BL, more D-2 pts had enthesitis (68%) than dactylitis (45%). At BL, 78% of pts with dactylitis vs 61% without (w/o) dactylitis had enthesitis and 51% of pts with enthesitis vs 32% w/o enthesitis had dactylitis. Among pts with enthesitis at BL, a higher percentage of pts with dactylitis (52%) had severe enthesitis (LEI score ≥3) vs pts w/o dactylitis (44%). Among those with the condition at BL, resolution rates of dactylitis (57%, Q4W; 64%, Q8W) and enthesitis (44%, Q4W; 54%, Q8W) at W24 increased through W52 (dactylitis: 74%, Q4W; 78%, Q8W; enthesitis: 57%, Q4W; 61%, Q8W) and were maintained at W100 (dactylitis: 72%, Q4W; 83%, Q8W; enthesitis: 62%, Q4W; 70%, Q8W). Consistent results were observed when evaluating mean changes in dactylitis and LEI scores and in pts who crossed over from PBO to GUS Q4W at W24 (Table 1). In pts with dactylitis and enthesitis at BL, GUS-treated pts showed significant correlations between resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis at W24 (p=0.004), W52 (p<0.001) and W100 (p=0.039), with nearly 90% of pts with enthesitis resolution also achieving dactylitis resolution at W52 and W100 (Figure).Table 1.LS mean change from baseline over time in dactylitis and LEI scores in pts with manifestation at baselineGUS 100 mg Q4WGUS 100 mg Q8WPBO → GUS 100 mg Q4WDactylitis score (0-60)Pts, N12111199W24a-5.9 (-6.7, -5.0)-6.0 (-6.8, -5.1)-4.0 (-5.0, -3.1)W52a-6.5 (-7.2, -5.8)-7.2 (-7.9, -6.5)-6.9 (-7.6, -6.2)W100a-6.5 (-7.1, -5.8)-7.5 (-8.1, -6.8)-6.9 (-7.6, -6.2)LEI score (1-6)Pts, N170158178W24a-1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)-1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)-1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)W52a-1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)-1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)-2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)W100a-1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)-2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)-2.1 (-2.3, -1.9)aResults are LS mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]); LS mean change determined by ANCOVA; missing data was imputed as no change for pts who discontinued treatment and using multiple imputation for remaining missing dataGUS, guselkumab; LEI, Leeds Enthesitis Index; LS, least squares; PBO, placebo; pts, patients; Q4W, every 4 weeks; Q8W, every 8 weeks; W, weekConclusionPts with PsA often present with concurrent enthesitis and dactylitis, both of which can be recalcitrant to treatment. GUS resolved enthesitis and dactylitis in substantial proportions of pts through W100. GUS-treated pts who achieved enthesitis resolution were more likely to achieve dactylitis resolution and vice versa.References[1]Deodhar A et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1115[2]Mease PJ et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1126[3]Ritchlin C et al. RMD Open. 2021;7(1):e001457[4]McInnes IB et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73:604[5]Kaeley GS et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;48:35[6]McGonagle D et al. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15:113Disclosure of InterestsProton Rahman Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Janssen and Novartis, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and UCB, Atul Deodhar Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Georg Schett Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Janssen, and Novartis, Philip J Mease Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Inmagene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Inmagene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Inmagene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB, May Shawi Shareholder of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, Daniel Cua Shareholder of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Jonathan Sherlock Shareholder of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Yusang Jiang Consultant of: Janssen, Employee of: Cytel Inc, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Christopher T. Ritchlin Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, and UCB Pharma, Dennis McGonagle Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB
Collapse
|
34
|
Aaij R, Abdelmotteleb ASW, Abellán Beteta C, Abudinén F, Ackernley T, Adeva B, Adinolfi M, Afsharnia H, Agapopoulou C, Aidala CA, Aiola S, Ajaltouni Z, Akar S, Albrecht J, Alessio F, Alexander M, Alfonso Albero A, Aliouche Z, Alkhazov G, Alvarez Cartelle P, Amato S, Amey JL, Amhis Y, An L, Anderlini L, Andersson N, Andreianov A, Andreotti M, Archilli F, Artamonov A, Artuso M, Arzymatov K, Aslanides E, Atzeni M, Audurier B, Bachmann S, Bachmayer M, Back JJ, Baladron Rodriguez P, Balagura V, Baldini W, Baptista Leite J, Barbetti M, Barlow RJ, Barsuk S, Barter W, Bartolini M, Baryshnikov F, Basels JM, Bashir S, Bassi G, Batsukh B, Battig A, Bay A, Beck A, Becker M, Bedeschi F, Bediaga I, Beiter A, Belavin V, Belin S, Bellee V, Belous K, Belov I, Belyaev I, Bencivenni G, Ben-Haim E, Berezhnoy A, Bernet R, Berninghoff D, Bernstein HC, Bertella C, Bertolin A, Betancourt C, Betti F, Bezshyiko I, Bhasin S, Bhom J, Bian L, Bieker MS, Biesuz NV, Bifani S, Billoir P, Biolchini A, Birch M, Bishop FCR, Bitadze A, Bizzeti A, Bjørn M, Blago MP, Blake T, Blanc F, Blusk S, Bobulska D, Boelhauve JA, Boente Garcia O, Boettcher T, Boldyrev A, Bondar A, Bondar N, Borghi S, Borisyak M, Borsato M, Borsuk JT, Bouchiba SA, Bowcock TJV, Boyer A, Bozzi C, Bradley MJ, Braun S, Brea Rodriguez A, Brodzicka J, Brossa Gonzalo A, Brundu D, Buonaura A, Buonincontri L, Burke AT, Burr C, Bursche A, Butkevich A, Butter JS, Buytaert J, Byczynski W, Cadeddu S, Cai H, Calabrese R, Calefice L, Cali S, Calladine R, Calvi M, Calvo Gomez M, Camargo Magalhaes P, Campana P, Campoverde Quezada AF, Capelli S, Capriotti L, Carbone A, Carboni G, Cardinale R, Cardini A, Carli I, Carniti P, Carus L, Carvalho Akiba K, Casais Vidal A, Caspary R, Casse G, Cattaneo M, Cavallero G, Celani S, Cerasoli J, Cervenkov D, Chadwick AJ, Chapman MG, Charles M, Charpentier P, Chatzikonstantinidis G, Chavez Barajas CA, Chefdeville M, Chen C, Chen S, Chernov A, Chobanova V, Cholak S, Chrzaszcz M, Chubykin A, Chulikov V, Ciambrone P, Cicala MF, Cid Vidal X, Ciezarek G, Clarke PEL, Clemencic M, Cliff HV, Closier J, Cobbledick JL, Coco V, Coelho JAB, Cogan J, Cogneras E, Cojocariu L, Collins P, Colombo T, Congedo L, Contu A, Cooke N, Coombs G, Corredoira I, Corti G, Costa Sobral CM, Couturier B, Craik DC, Crkovská J, Cruz Torres M, Currie R, Da Silva CL, Dadabaev S, Dai L, Dall'Occo E, Dalseno J, D'Ambrosio C, Danilina A, d'Argent P, Dashkina A, Davies JE, Davis A, De Aguiar Francisco O, De Bruyn K, De Capua S, De Cian M, De Lucia E, De Miranda JM, De Paula L, De Serio M, De Simone D, De Simone P, De Vellis F, de Vries JA, Dean CT, Debernardis F, Decamp D, Dedu V, Del Buono L, Delaney B, Dembinski HP, Dendek A, Denysenko V, Derkach D, Deschamps O, Desse F, Dettori F, Dey B, Di Cicco A, Di Nezza P, Didenko S, Dieste Maronas L, Dijkstra H, Dobishuk V, Dong C, Donohoe AM, Dordei F, Dos Reis AC, Douglas L, Dovbnya A, Downes AG, Dudek MW, Dufour L, Duk V, Durante P, Durham JM, Dutta D, Dziurda A, Dzyuba A, Easo S, Egede U, Egorychev V, Eidelman S, Eisenhardt S, Ek-In S, Eklund L, Ely S, Ene A, Epple E, Escher S, Eschle J, Esen S, Evans T, Falcao LN, Fan Y, Fang B, Farry S, Fazzini D, Féo M, Fernandez Prieto A, Fernez AD, Ferrari F, Ferreira Lopes L, Ferreira Rodrigues F, Ferreres Sole S, Ferrillo M, Ferro-Luzzi M, Filippov S, Fini RA, Fiorini M, Firlej M, Fischer KM, Fitzgerald DS, Fitzpatrick C, Fiutowski T, Fkiaras A, Fleuret F, Fontana M, Fontanelli F, Forty R, Foulds-Holt D, Franco Lima V, Franco Sevilla M, Frank M, Franzoso E, Frau G, Frei C, Friday DA, Fu J, Fuehring Q, Gabriel E, Galati G, Gallas Torreira A, Galli D, Gambetta S, Gan Y, Gandelman M, Gandini P, Gao Y, Garau M, Garcia Martin LM, Garcia Moreno P, García Pardiñas J, Garcia Plana B, Garcia Rosales FA, Garrido L, Gaspar C, Geertsema RE, Gerick D, Gerken LL, Gersabeck E, Gersabeck M, Gershon T, Gerstel D, Giambastiani L, Gibson V, Giemza HK, Gilman AL, Giovannetti M, Gioventù A, Gironella Gironell P, Giugliano C, Gizdov K, Gkougkousis EL, Gligorov VV, Göbel C, Golobardes E, Golubkov D, Golutvin A, Gomes A, Gomez Fernandez S, Goncalves Abrantes F, Goncerz M, Gong G, Gorbounov P, Gorelov IV, Gotti C, Govorkova E, Grabowski JP, Grammatico T, Granado Cardoso LA, Graugés E, Graverini E, Graziani G, Grecu A, Greeven LM, Grieser NA, Grillo L, Gromov S, Gruberg Cazon BR, Gu C, Guarise M, Guittiere M, Günther PA, Gushchin E, Guth A, Guz Y, Gys T, Hadavizadeh T, Haefeli G, Haen C, Haimberger J, Halewood-Leagas T, Hamilton PM, Hammerich JP, Han Q, Han X, Hancock TH, Hansen EB, Hansmann-Menzemer S, Harnew N, Harrison T, Hasse C, Hatch M, He J, Hecker M, Heijhoff K, Heinicke K, Henderson RDL, Hennequin AM, Hennessy K, Henry L, Heuel J, Hicheur A, Hill D, Hilton M, Hollitt SE, Hou R, Hou Y, Hu J, Hu J, Hu W, Hu X, Huang W, Huang X, Hulsbergen W, Hunter RJ, Hushchyn M, Hutchcroft D, Hynds D, Ibis P, Idzik M, Ilin D, Ilten P, Inglessi A, Ishteev A, Ivshin K, Jacobsson R, Jage H, Jakobsen S, Jans E, Jashal BK, Jawahery A, Jevtic V, Jiang X, John M, Johnson D, Jones CR, Jones TP, Jost B, Jurik N, Kalavan Kadavath SH, Kandybei S, Kang Y, Karacson M, Karpov M, Kautz JW, Keizer F, Keller DM, Kenzie M, Ketel T, Khanji B, Kharisova A, Kholodenko S, Kirn T, Kirsebom VS, Kitouni O, Klaver S, Kleijne N, Klimaszewski K, Kmiec MR, Koliiev S, Kondybayeva A, Konoplyannikov A, Kopciewicz P, Kopecna R, Koppenburg P, Korolev M, Kostiuk I, Kot O, Kotriakhova S, Kravchenko P, Kravchuk L, Krawczyk RD, Kreps M, Kress F, Kretzschmar S, Krokovny P, Krupa W, Krzemien W, Kubat J, Kucharczyk M, Kudryavtsev V, Kuindersma HS, Kunde GJ, Kvaratskheliya T, Lacarrere D, Lafferty G, Lai A, Lampis A, Lancierini D, Lane JJ, Lane R, Lanfranchi G, Langenbruch C, Langer J, Lantwin O, Latham T, Lazzari F, Le Gac R, Lee SH, Lefèvre R, Leflat A, Legotin S, Leroy O, Lesiak T, Leverington B, Li H, Li P, Li S, Li Y, Li Y, Li Z, Liang X, Lin T, Lindner R, Lisovskyi V, Litvinov R, Liu G, Liu H, Liu Q, Liu S, Lobo Salvia A, Loi A, Lomba Castro J, Longstaff I, Lopes JH, López Soliño S, Lovell GH, Lu Y, Lucarelli C, Lucchesi D, Luchuk S, Lucio Martinez M, Lukashenko V, Luo Y, Lupato A, Luppi E, Lupton O, Lusiani A, Lyu X, Ma L, Ma R, Maccolini S, Machefert F, Maciuc F, Macko V, Mackowiak P, Maddrell-Mander S, Madejczyk O, Madhan Mohan LR, Maev O, Maevskiy A, Majewski MW, Malczewski JJ, Malde S, Malecki B, Malinin A, Maltsev T, Malygina H, Manca G, Mancinelli G, Manuzzi D, Marangotto D, Maratas J, Marchand JF, Marconi U, Mariani S, Marin Benito C, Marinangeli M, Marks J, Marshall AM, Marshall PJ, Martelli G, Martellotti G, Martinazzoli L, Martinelli M, Martinez Santos D, Martinez Vidal F, Massafferri A, Materok M, Matev R, Mathad A, Matiunin V, Matteuzzi C, Mattioli KR, Mauri A, Maurice E, Mauricio J, Mazurek M, McCann M, Mcconnell L, Mcgrath TH, Mchugh NT, McNab A, McNulty R, Mead JV, Meadows B, Meier G, Melnychuk D, Meloni S, Merk M, Merli A, Meyer Garcia L, Mikhasenko M, Milanes DA, Millard E, Milovanovic M, Minard MN, Minotti A, Minzoni L, Mitchell SE, Mitreska B, Mitzel DS, Mödden A, Mohammed RA, Moise RD, Mokhnenko S, Mombächer T, Monroy IA, Monteil S, Morandin M, Morello G, Morello MJ, Moron J, Morris AB, Morris AG, Mountain R, Mu H, Muheim F, Mulder M, Müller D, Müller K, Murphy CH, Murray D, Murta R, Muzzetto P, Naik P, Nakada T, Nandakumar R, Nanut T, Nasteva I, Needham M, Neri N, Neubert S, Neufeld N, Newcombe R, Niel EM, Nieswand S, Nikitin N, Nolte NS, Normand C, Nunez C, Oblakowska-Mucha A, Obraztsov V, Oeser T, O'Hanlon DP, Okamura S, Oldeman R, Oliva F, Olivares ME, Onderwater CJG, O'Neil RH, Otalora Goicochea JM, Ovsiannikova T, Owen P, Oyanguren A, Padeken KO, Pagare B, Pais PR, Pajero T, Palano A, Palutan M, Pan Y, Panshin G, Papanestis A, Pappagallo M, Pappalardo LL, Pappenheimer C, Parker W, Parkes C, Passalacqua B, Passaleva G, Pastore A, Patel M, Patrignani C, Pawley CJ, Pearce A, Pellegrino A, Pepe Altarelli M, Perazzini S, Pereima D, Pereiro Castro A, Perret P, Petric M, Petridis K, Petrolini A, Petrov A, Petrucci S, Petruzzo M, Pham TTH, Philippov A, Piandani R, Pica L, Piccini M, Pietrzyk B, Pietrzyk G, Pili M, Pinci D, Pisani F, Pizzichemi M, P K R, Placinta V, Plews J, Plo Casasus M, Polci F, Poli Lener M, Poliakova M, Poluektov A, Polukhina N, Polyakov I, Polycarpo E, Ponce S, Popov D, Popov S, Poslavskii S, Prasanth K, Promberger L, Prouve C, Pugatch V, Puill V, Punzi G, Qi H, Qian W, Qin N, Quagliani R, Raab NV, Rabadan Trejo RI, Rachwal B, Rademacker JH, Rama M, Ramos Pernas M, Rangel MS, Ratnikov F, Raven G, Reboud M, Redi F, Reiss F, Remon Alepuz C, Ren Z, Renaudin V, Ribatti R, Ricci AM, Ricciardi S, Rinnert K, Robbe P, Robertson G, Rodrigues AB, Rodrigues E, Rodriguez Lopez JA, Rodriguez Rodriguez ERR, Rollings A, Roloff P, Romanovskiy V, Romero Lamas M, Romero Vidal A, Roth JD, Rotondo M, Rudolph MS, Ruf T, Ruiz Fernandez RA, Ruiz Vidal J, Ryzhikov A, Ryzka J, Saborido Silva JJ, Sagidova N, Sahoo N, Saitta B, Salomoni M, Sanchez Gras C, Santacesaria R, Santamarina Rios C, Santimaria M, Santovetti E, Saranin D, Sarpis G, Sarpis M, Sarti A, Satriano C, Satta A, Saur M, Savrina D, Sazak H, Scantlebury Smead LG, Scarabotto A, Schael S, Scherl S, Schiller M, Schindler H, Schmelling M, Schmidt B, Schmitt S, Schneider O, Schopper A, Schubiger M, Schulte S, Schune MH, Schwemmer R, Sciascia B, Sellam S, Semennikov A, Senghi Soares M, Sergi A, Serra N, Sestini L, Seuthe A, Shang Y, Shangase DM, Shapkin M, Shchemerov I, Shchutska L, Shears T, Shekhtman L, Shen Z, Sheng S, Shevchenko V, Shields EB, Shimizu Y, Shmanin E, Shupperd JD, Siddi BG, Silva Coutinho R, Simi G, Simone S, Skidmore N, Skwarnicki T, Slater MW, Slazyk I, Smallwood JC, Smeaton JG, Smetkina A, Smith E, Smith M, Snoch A, Soares Lavra L, Sokoloff MD, Soler FJP, Solovev A, Solovyev I, Souza De Almeida FL, Souza De Paula B, Spaan B, Spadaro Norella E, Spradlin P, Stagni F, Stahl M, Stahl S, Stanislaus S, Steinkamp O, Stenyakin O, Stevens H, Stone S, Strekalina D, Suljik F, Sun J, Sun L, Sun Y, Svihra P, Swallow PN, Swientek K, Szabelski A, Szumlak T, Szymanski M, Taneja S, Tanner AR, Tat MD, Terentev A, Teubert F, Thomas E, Thompson DJD, Thomson KA, Tilquin H, Tisserand V, T'Jampens S, Tobin M, Tomassetti L, Tong X, Torres Machado D, Tou DY, Trifonova E, Trilov SM, Trippl C, Tuci G, Tully A, Tuning N, Ukleja A, Unverzagt DJ, Ursov E, Usachov A, Ustyuzhanin A, Uwer U, Vagner A, Vagnoni V, Valassi A, Valenti G, Valls Canudas N, van Beuzekom M, Van Dijk M, Van Hecke H, van Herwijnen E, van Veghel M, Vazquez Gomez R, Vazquez Regueiro P, Vázquez Sierra C, Vecchi S, Velthuis JJ, Veltri M, Venkateswaran A, Veronesi M, Vesterinen M, Vieira D, Vieites Diaz M, Viemann H, Vilasis-Cardona X, Vilella Figueras E, Villa A, Vincent P, Volle FC, Vom Bruch D, Vorobyev A, Vorobyev V, Voropaev N, Vos K, Waldi R, Walsh J, Wang C, Wang J, Wang J, Wang J, Wang J, Wang M, Wang R, Wang Y, Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang Z, Ward JA, Watson NK, Weber SG, Websdale D, Weisser C, Westhenry BDC, White DJ, Whitehead M, Wiederhold AR, Wiedner D, Wilkinson G, Wilkinson M, Williams I, Williams M, Williams MRJ, Wilson FF, Wislicki W, Witek M, Witola L, Wormser G, Wotton SA, Wu H, Wyllie K, Xiang Z, Xiao D, Xie Y, Xu A, Xu J, Xu L, Xu M, Xu Q, Xu Z, Xu Z, Yang D, Yang S, Yang Y, Yang Z, Yang Z, Yao Y, Yeomans LE, Yin H, Yu J, Yuan X, Yushchenko O, Zaffaroni E, Zavertyaev M, Zdybal M, Zenaiev O, Zeng M, Zhang D, Zhang L, Zhang S, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zharkova A, Zhelezov A, Zheng Y, Zhou T, Zhou X, Zhou Y, Zhovkovska V, Zhu X, Zhu X, Zhu Z, Zhukov V, Zonneveld JB, Zou Q, Zucchelli S, Zuliani D, Zunica G. Tests of Lepton Universality Using B^{0}→K_{S}^{0}ℓ^{+}ℓ^{-} and B^{+}→K^{*+}ℓ^{+}ℓ^{-} Decays. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2022; 128:191802. [PMID: 35622021 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.191802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Tests of lepton universality in B^{0}→K_{S}^{0}ℓ^{+}ℓ^{-} and B^{+}→K^{*+}ℓ^{+}ℓ^{-} decays where ℓ is either an electron or a muon are presented. The differential branching fractions of B^{0}→K_{S}^{0}e^{+}e^{-} and B^{+}→K^{*+}e^{+}e^{-} decays are measured in intervals of the dilepton invariant mass squared. The measurements are performed using proton-proton collision data recorded by the LHCb experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9 fb^{-1} . The results are consistent with the standard model and previous tests of lepton universality in related decay modes. The first observation of B^{0}→K_{S}^{0}e^{+}e^{-} and B^{+}→K^{*+}e^{+}e^{-} decays is reported.
Collapse
|
35
|
Aaij R, Abdelmotteleb ASW, Beteta CA, Abudinén F, Ackernley T, Adeva B, Adinolfi M, Afsharnia H, Agapopoulou C, Aidala CA, Aiola S, Ajaltouni Z, Akar S, Albrecht J, Alessio F, Alexander M, Albero AA, Aliouche Z, Alkhazov G, Cartelle PA, Amato S, Amey JL, Amhis Y, An L, Anderlini L, Andersson M, Andreianov A, Andreotti M, Archilli F, Artamonov A, Artuso M, Arzymatov K, Aslanides E, Atzeni M, Audurier B, Bachmann S, Bachmayer M, Back JJ, Rodriguez PB, Balagura V, Baldini W, Baptista de Souza Leite J, Barbetti M, Barlow RJ, Barsuk S, Barter W, Bartolini M, Baryshnikov F, Basels JM, Bashir S, Bassi G, Batsukh B, Battig A, Bay A, Beck A, Becker M, Bedeschi F, Bediaga I, Beiter A, Belavin V, Belin S, Bellee V, Belous K, Belov I, Belyaev I, Bencivenni G, Ben-Haim E, Berezhnoy A, Bernet R, Berninghoff D, Bernstein HC, Bertella C, Bertolin A, Betancourt C, Betti F, Bezshyiko I, Bhasin S, Bhom J, Bian L, Bieker MS, Biesuz NV, Bifani S, Billoir P, Biolchini A, Birch M, Bishop FCR, Bitadze A, Bizzeti A, Bjørn M, Blago MP, Blake T, Blanc F, Blusk S, Bobulska D, Boelhauve JA, Garcia OB, Boettcher T, Boldyrev A, Bondar A, Bondar N, Borghi S, Borisyak M, Borsato M, Borsuk JT, Bouchiba SA, Bowcock TJV, Boyer A, Bozzi C, Bradley MJ, Braun S, Rodriguez AB, Brodzicka J, Gonzalo AB, Brundu D, Buonaura A, Buonincontri L, Burke AT, Burr C, Bursche A, Butkevich A, Butter JS, Buytaert J, Byczynski W, Cadeddu S, Cai H, Calabrese R, Calefice L, Cali S, Calladine R, Calvi M, Gomez MC, Magalhaes PC, Campana P, Quezada AFC, Capelli S, Capriotti L, Carbone A, Carboni G, Cardinale R, Cardini A, Carli I, Carniti P, Carus L, Akiba KC, Vidal AC, Caspary R, Casse G, Cattaneo M, Cavallero G, Celani S, Cerasoli J, Cervenkov D, Chadwick AJ, Chapman MG, Charles M, Charpentier P, Barajas CAC, Chefdeville M, Chen C, Chen S, Chernov A, Chobanova V, Cholak S, Chrzaszcz M, Chubykin A, Chulikov V, Ciambrone P, Cicala MF, Vidal XC, Ciezarek G, Clarke PEL, Clemencic M, Cliff HV, Closier J, Cobbledick JL, Coco V, Coelho JAB, Cogan J, Cogneras E, Cojocariu L, Collins P, Colombo T, Congedo L, Contu A, Cooke N, Coombs G, Corredoira I, Corti G, Sobral CMC, Couturier B, Craik DC, Crkovská J, Torres MC, Currie R, Da Silva CL, Dadabaev S, Dai L, Dall'Occo E, Dalseno J, D'Ambrosio C, Danilina A, d'Argent P, Dashkina A, Davies JE, Davis A, Francisco ODA, De Bruyn K, De Capua S, De Cian M, Da Graca UDFC, De Lucia E, De Miranda JM, De Paula L, De Serio M, De Simone D, De Simone P, De Vellis F, de Vries JA, Dean CT, Debernardis F, Decamp D, Dedu V, Del Buono L, Delaney B, Dembinski HP, Denysenko V, Derkach D, Deschamps O, Dettori F, Dey B, Di Cicco A, Di Nezza P, Didenko S, Maronas LD, Dijkstra H, Dobishuk V, Dong C, Donohoe AM, Dordei F, Dos Reis AC, Douglas L, Dovbnya A, Downes AG, Dudek MW, Dufour L, Duk V, Durante P, Durham JM, Dutta D, Dziurda A, Dzyuba A, Easo S, Egede U, Egorychev V, Eidelman S, Eisenhardt S, Ek-In S, Eklund L, Ely S, Ene A, Epple E, Escher S, Eschle J, Esen S, Evans T, Falcao LN, Fan Y, Fang B, Farry S, Fazzini D, Féo M, Prieto AF, Fernez AD, Ferrari F, Lopes LF, Rodrigues FF, Sole SF, Ferrillo M, Ferro-Luzzi M, Filippov S, Fini RA, Fiorini M, Firlej M, Fischer KM, Fitzgerald DS, Fitzpatrick C, Fiutowski T, Fkiaras A, Fleuret F, Fontana M, Fontanelli F, Forty R, Foulds-Holt D, Lima VF, Sevilla MF, Frank M, Franzoso E, Frau G, Frei C, Friday DA, Fu J, Fuehring Q, Gabriel E, Galati G, Torreira AG, Galli D, Gambetta S, Gan Y, Gandelman M, Gandini P, Gao Y, Garau M, Martin LMG, Moreno PG, García Pardiñas J, Plana BG, Rosales FAG, Garrido L, Gaspar C, Geertsema RE, Gerick D, Gerken LL, Gersabeck E, Gersabeck M, Gershon T, Gerstel D, Giambastiani L, Gibson V, Giemza HK, Gilman AL, Giovannetti M, Gioventù A, Gironell PG, Giugliano C, Gizdov K, Gkougkousis EL, Gligorov VV, Göbel C, Golobardes E, Golubkov D, Golutvin A, Gomes A, Fernandez SG, Abrantes FG, Goncerz M, Gong G, Gorbounov P, Gorelov IV, Gotti C, Grabowski JP, Grammatico T, Cardoso LAG, Graugés E, Graverini E, Graziani G, Grecu A, Greeven LM, Grieser NA, Grillo L, Gromov S, Cazon BRG, Gu C, Guarise M, Guittiere M, Günther PA, Gushchin E, Guth A, Guz Y, Gys T, Hadavizadeh T, Haefeli G, Haen C, Haimberger J, Haines SC, Halewood-Leagas T, Hamilton PM, Hammerich JP, Han Q, Han X, Hansen EB, Hansmann-Menzemer S, Harnew N, Harrison T, Hasse C, Hatch M, He J, Hecker M, Heijhoff K, Heinicke K, Henderson RDL, Hennequin AM, Hennessy K, Henry L, Heuel J, Hicheur A, Hill D, Hilton M, Hollitt SE, Hou R, Hou Y, Hu J, Hu J, Hu W, Hu X, Huang W, Huang X, Hulsbergen W, Hunter RJ, Hushchyn M, Hutchcroft D, Hynds D, Ibis P, Idzik M, Ilin D, Ilten P, Inglessi A, Ishteev A, Ivshin K, Jacobsson R, Jage H, Jakobsen S, Jans E, Jashal BK, Jawahery A, Jevtic V, Jiang X, John M, Johnson D, Jones CR, Jones TP, Jost B, Jurik N, Kadavath SHK, Kandybei S, Kang Y, Karacson M, Karpenkov D, Karpov M, Kautz JW, Keizer F, Keller DM, Kenzie M, Ketel T, Khanji B, Kharisova A, Kholodenko S, Kirn T, Kirsebom VS, Kitouni O, Klaver S, Kleijne N, Klimaszewski K, Kmiec MR, Koliiev S, Kondybayeva A, Konoplyannikov A, Kopciewicz P, Kopecna R, Koppenburg P, Korolev M, Kostiuk I, Kot O, Kotriakhova S, Kozachuk A, Kravchenko P, Kravchuk L, Krawczyk RD, Kreps M, Kretzschmar S, Krokovny P, Krupa W, Krzemien W, Kubat J, Kucharczyk M, Kudryavtsev V, Kuindersma HS, Kunde GJ, Kvaratskheliya T, Lacarrere D, Lafferty G, Lai A, Lampis A, Lancierini D, Lane JJ, Lane R, Lanfranchi G, Langenbruch C, Langer J, Lantwin O, Latham T, Lazzari F, Le Gac R, Lee SH, Lefèvre R, Leflat A, Legotin S, Leroy O, Lesiak T, Leverington B, Li H, Li P, Li S, Li Y, Li Z, Liang X, Lin T, Lindner R, Lisovskyi V, Litvinov R, Liu G, Liu H, Liu Q, Liu S, Salvia AL, Loi A, Lollini R, Castro JL, Longstaff I, Lopes JH, Soliño SL, Lovell GH, Lu Y, Lucarelli C, Lucchesi D, Luchuk S, Martinez ML, Lukashenko V, Luo Y, Lupato A, Luppi E, Lupton O, Lusiani A, Lyu X, Ma L, Ma R, Maccolini S, Machefert F, Maciuc F, Macko V, Mackowiak P, Maddrell-Mander S, Madejczyk O, Mohan LRM, Maev O, Maevskiy A, Maisuzenko D, Majewski MW, Malczewski JJ, Malde S, Malecki B, Malinin A, Maltsev T, Malygina H, Manca G, Mancinelli G, Manuzzi D, Marangotto D, Maratas J, Marchand JF, Marconi U, Mariani S, Benito CM, Marinangeli M, Marks J, Marshall AM, Marshall PJ, Martelli G, Martellotti G, Martinazzoli L, Martinelli M, Santos DM, Vidal FM, Massafferri A, Materok M, Matev R, Mathad A, Matiunin V, Matteuzzi C, Mattioli KR, Mauri A, Maurice E, Mauricio J, Mazurek M, McCann M, Mcconnell L, Mcgrath TH, Mchugh NT, McNab A, McNulty R, Mead JV, Meadows B, Meier G, Melnychuk D, Meloni S, Merk M, Merli A, Garcia LM, Mikhasenko M, Milanes DA, Millard E, Milovanovic M, Minard MN, Minotti A, Mitchell SE, Mitreska B, Mitzel DS, Mödden A, Mohammed RA, Moise RD, Mokhnenko S, Mombächer T, Monroy IA, Monteil S, Morandin M, Morello G, Morello MJ, Moron J, Morris AB, Morris AG, Mountain R, Mu H, Muheim F, Mulder M, Müller K, Murphy CH, Murray D, Murta R, Muzzetto P, Naik P, Nakada T, Nandakumar R, Nanut T, Nasteva I, Needham M, Neri N, Neubert S, Neufeld N, Newcombe R, Niel EM, Nieswand S, Nikitin N, Nolte NS, Normand C, Nunez C, Oblakowska-Mucha A, Obraztsov V, Oeser T, O'Hanlon DP, Okamura S, Oldeman R, Oliva F, Olivares ME, Onderwater CJG, O'Neil RH, Goicochea JMO, Ovsiannikova T, Owen P, Oyanguren A, Ozcelik O, Padeken KO, Pagare B, Pais PR, Pajero T, Palano A, Palutan M, Pan Y, Panshin G, Papanestis A, Pappagallo M, Pappalardo LL, Pappenheimer C, Parker W, Parkes C, Passalacqua B, Passaleva G, Pastore A, Patel M, Patrignani C, Pawley CJ, Pearce A, Pellegrino A, Altarelli MP, Perazzini S, Pereima D, Castro AP, Perret P, Petric M, Petridis K, Petrolini A, Petrov A, Petrucci S, Petruzzo M, Pham TTH, Philippov A, Piandani R, Pica L, Piccini M, Pietrzyk B, Pietrzyk G, Pili M, Pinci D, Pisani F, Pizzichemi M, Resmi PK, Placinta V, Plews J, Casasus MP, Polci F, Lener MP, Poliakova M, Poluektov A, Polukhina N, Polyakov I, Polycarpo E, Ponce S, Popov D, Popov S, Poslavskii S, Prasanth K, Promberger L, Prouve C, Pugatch V, Puill V, Punzi G, Qi H, Qian W, Qin N, Quagliani R, Raab NV, Trejo RIR, Rachwal B, Rademacker JH, Rajagopalan R, Rama M, Pernas MR, Rangel MS, Ratnikov F, Raven G, Reboud M, Redi F, Reiss F, Alepuz CR, Ren Z, Renaudin V, Ribatti R, Ricci AM, Ricciardi S, Rinnert K, Robbe P, Robertson G, Rodrigues AB, Rodrigues E, Lopez JAR, Rodriguez ERRR, Rollings A, Roloff P, Romanovskiy V, Lamas MR, Vidal AR, Roth JD, Rotondo M, Rudolph MS, Ruf T, Fernandez RAR, Vidal JR, Ryzhikov A, Ryzka J, Silva JJS, Sagidova N, Sahoo N, Saitta B, Salomoni M, Gras CS, Santacesaria R, Rios CS, Santimaria M, Santovetti E, Saranin D, Sarpis G, Sarpis M, Sarti A, Satriano C, Satta A, Saur M, Savrina D, Sazak H, Smead LGS, Scarabotto A, Schael S, Scherl S, Schiller M, Schindler H, Schmelling M, Schmidt B, Schmitt S, Schneider O, Schopper A, Schubiger M, Schulte S, Schune MH, Schwemmer R, Sciascia B, Sellam S, Semennikov A, Soares MS, Sergi A, Serra N, Sestini L, Seuthe A, Shang Y, Shangase DM, Shapkin M, Shchemerov I, Shchutska L, Shears T, Shekhtman L, Shen Z, Sheng S, Shevchenko V, Shields EB, Shimizu Y, Shmanin E, Shupperd JD, Siddi BG, Coutinho RS, Simi G, Simone S, Skidmore N, Skuza R, Skwarnicki T, Slater MW, Slazyk I, Smallwood JC, Smeaton JG, Smith E, Smith M, Snoch A, Lavra LS, Sokoloff MD, Soler FJP, Solovev A, Solovyev I, De Almeida FLS, De Paula BS, Spaan B, Norella ES, Spradlin P, Stagni F, Stahl M, Stahl S, Stanislaus S, Steinkamp O, Stenyakin O, Stevens H, Stone S, Strekalina D, Suljik F, Sun J, Sun L, Sun Y, Svihra P, Swallow PN, Swientek K, Szabelski A, Szumlak T, Szymanski M, Taneja S, Tanner AR, Tat MD, Terentev A, Teubert F, Thomas E, Thompson DJD, Thomson KA, Tilquin H, Tisserand V, T'Jampens S, Tobin M, Tomassetti L, Tong X, Machado DT, Tou DY, Trifonova E, Trilov SM, Trippl C, Tuci G, Tully A, Tuning N, Ukleja A, Unverzagt DJ, Ursov E, Usachov A, Ustyuzhanin A, Uwer U, Vagner A, Vagnoni V, Valassi A, Valenti G, Canudas NV, van Beuzekom M, Van Dijk M, Van Hecke H, van Herwijnen E, van Veghel M, Gomez RV, Regueiro PV, Sierra CV, Vecchi S, Velthuis JJ, Veltri M, Venkateswaran A, Veronesi M, Vesterinen M, Vieira D, Diaz MV, Viemann H, Vilasis-Cardona X, Figueras EV, Villa A, Vincent P, Volle FC, Bruch DV, Vorobyev A, Vorobyev V, Voropaev N, Vos K, Waldi R, Walsh J, Wang C, Wang J, Wang J, Wang J, Wang J, Wang M, Wang R, Wang Y, Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang Z, Ward JA, Watson NK, Websdale D, Weisser C, Westhenry BDC, White DJ, Whitehead M, Wiederhold AR, Wiedner D, Wilkinson G, Wilkinson MK, Williams I, Williams M, Williams MRJ, Wilson FF, Wislicki W, Witek M, Witola L, Wormser G, Wotton SA, Wu H, Wyllie K, Xiang Z, Xiao D, Xie Y, Xu A, Xu J, Xu L, Xu M, Xu Q, Xu Z, Xu Z, Yang D, Yang S, Yang Y, Yang Z, Yang Z, Yao Y, Yeomans LE, Yin H, Yu J, Yuan X, Yushchenko O, Zaffaroni E, Zavertyaev M, Zdybal M, Zenaiev O, Zeng M, Zhang D, Zhang L, Zhang S, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zharkova A, Zhelezov A, Zheng Y, Zhou T, Zhou X, Zhou Y, Zhovkovska V, Zhu X, Zhu X, Zhu Z, Zhukov V, Zou Q, Zucchelli S, Zuliani D, Zunica G. Observation of the Decay Λ_{b}^{0}→Λ_{c}^{+}τ^{-}ν[over ¯]_{τ}. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2022; 128:191803. [PMID: 35622037 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.191803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The first observation of the semileptonic b-baryon decay Λ_{b}^{0}→Λ_{c}^{+}τ^{-}ν[over ¯]_{τ}, with a significance of 6.1σ, is reported using a data sample corresponding to 3 fb^{-1} of integrated luminosity, collected by the LHCb experiment at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV at the LHC. The τ^{-} lepton is reconstructed in the hadronic decay to three charged pions. The ratio K=B(Λ_{b}^{0}→Λ_{c}^{+}τ^{-}ν[over ¯]_{τ})/B(Λ_{b}^{0}→Λ_{c}^{+}π^{-}π^{+}π^{-}) is measured to be 2.46±0.27±0.40, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. The branching fraction B(Λ_{b}^{0}→Λ_{c}^{+}τ^{-}ν[over ¯]_{τ})=(1.50±0.16±0.25±0.23)% is obtained, where the third uncertainty is from the external branching fraction of the normalization channel Λ_{b}^{0}→Λ_{c}^{+}π^{-}π^{+}π^{-}. The ratio of semileptonic branching fractions R(Λ_{c}^{+})≡B(Λ_{b}^{0}→Λ_{c}^{+}τ^{-}ν[over ¯]_{τ})/B(Λ_{b}^{0}→Λ_{c}^{+}μ^{-}ν[over ¯]_{μ}) is derived to be 0.242±0.026±0.040±0.059, where the external branching fraction uncertainty from the channel Λ_{b}^{0}→Λ_{c}^{+}μ^{-}ν[over ¯]_{μ} contributes to the last term. This result is in agreement with the standard model prediction.
Collapse
|
36
|
Cui Y, Fan B, Xu X, Sheng S, Xu Y, Wang X. A High-Density Genetic Map Enables Genome Synteny and QTL Mapping of Vegetative Growth and Leaf Traits in Gardenia. Front Genet 2022; 12:802738. [PMID: 35132310 PMCID: PMC8817757 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.802738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The gardenia is a traditional medicinal horticultural plant in China, but its molecular genetic research has been largely hysteretic. Here, we constructed an F1 population with 200 true hybrid individuals. Using the genotyping-by-sequencing method, a high-density sex-average genetic map was generated that contained 4,249 SNPs with a total length of 1956.28 cM and an average genetic distance of 0.46 cM. We developed 17 SNP-based Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR markers and found that 15 SNPs were successfully genotyped, of which 13 single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypings of 96 F1 individuals showed genotypes consistent with GBS-mined genotypes. A genomic collinearity analysis between gardenia and the Rubiaceae species Coffea arabica, Coffea canephora and Ophiorrhiza pumila showed the relativity strong conservation of LG11 with NC_039,919.1, HG974438.1 and Bliw01000011.1, respectively. Lastly, a quantitative trait loci analysis at three phenotyping time points (2019, 2020, and 2021) yielded 18 QTLs for growth-related traits and 31 QTLs for leaf-related traits, of which qBSBN7-1, qCD8 and qLNP2-1 could be repeatably detected. Five QTL regions (qCD8 and qSBD8, qBSBN7 and qSI7, qCD4-1 and qLLLS4, qLNP10 and qSLWS10-2, qSBD10 and qLLLS10) with potential pleiotropic effects were also observed. This study provides novel insight into molecular genetic research and could be helpful for further gene cloning and marker-assisted selection for early growth and development traits in the gardenia.
Collapse
|
37
|
Mcinnes I, Rahman P, Gottlieb AB, Hsia EC, Kollmeier A, Xu XL, Sheng S, Jiang Y, Shawi M, Chakravarty SD, Van der Heijde D, Mease PJ. POS1027 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF GUSELKUMAB, A MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY SPECIFIC TO THE p19-SUBUNIT OF INTERLEUKIN-23, THROUGH 2 YEARS: RESULTS FROM A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY CONDUCTED IN BIOLOGIC-NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS. Ann Rheum Dis 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background:Guselkumab (GUS), a selective IL-23 inhibitor dosed every 4 or 8 weeks (Q4W or Q8W), demonstrated efficacy for joint and skin symptoms, inhibition of structural damage progression (Q4W), and safety vs. placebo (PBO) through Week 24 (W24) of the Ph3, double-blind, PBO-controlled trial in biologic-naïve pts with PsA (DISCOVER-2).1 Favorable benefit-risk was also seen through 1 year.2Objectives:To assess GUS efficacy and safety through 2 years.Methods:Biologic-naïve adults with active PsA (≥5 swollen joint count [SJC] + ≥5 tender joint count [TJC]; CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL) were randomized (1:1:1) to GUS 100 mg Q4W; GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, Q8W; or PBO with crossover to GUS 100 mg Q4W (PBO→Q4W) at W24. Clinical efficacy (ACR/PASI/IGA/HAQ-DI) was assessed in the modified intention to treat (mITT) population through W100 with missing data imputation (nonresponse for categorical endpoints; no change/multiple imputation for continuous endpoints). Observed PsA-modified van der Heijde Sharp (vdH-S) scores derived from blinded radiographic images collected at W0, W24, W52, W100 (or at discontinuation [d/c]) and adverse events (AEs) through W112 were collected.Results:712/739 (96%) randomized pts continued study agent at W24; 687/739 (93%) continued at W52; 652/739 (88%) completed W100. ACR20 response rates in the mITT population continued to increase after W24, and at W100 were 76% for Q4W and 74% for Q8W (Figure 1). Similar response patterns were seen for ACR50/70, HAQ-DI and PASI90/100 (Table 1), and IGA0/1 and PASI75 response rates were consistent through W100 in pts randomized to Q4W and Q8W; W100 data for PBO→Q4W pts were consistent with pts treated with Q4W and Q8W (Table 1). GUS improvements in SF-36 PCS/MCS at W52 also persisted through W100 (data not shown). Low rates of radiographic progression (as measured by PsA-modified vdH-S scores) were observed during W52-100 for Q4W (n=227; 0.75) and Q8W (n=232; 0.46). In the PBO→Q4W group (n=228), radiographic progression was 1.12 during W0-24 (while on PBO), 0.51 during W24-100 (while on Q4W), and 0.13 during W52-100. Through W112, the incidences of AEs, serious AEs (SAEs), AEs leading to d/c, infections, serious infections, and injection site reactions were generally consistent with the PBO-controlled period and through 1 year. Of the pts in the Q4W (n=245), Q8W (n=248), and PBO→Q4W (n=238) groups, 9%, 9% and 7% had ≥1 SAE; 2%, 3% and 3% had ≥1 serious infection; 2 Q8W pts (fungal esophagitis, disseminated herpes zoster) and 1 PBO→Q4W pt (listeria meningitis) had opportunistic infections; 1 PBO→Q4W pt died (road traffic accident); 1 PBO-randomized pt had IBD; no pt had anaphylactic or serum sickness reaction, or active TB.Conclusion:In biologic-naïve PsA pts, GUS improvements in joint and skin symptoms, physical function, and low rates of radiographic progression persisted through 2 years. GUS safety in PsA through 2 years was comparable with safety at 6 months and 1 year, similar between Q4W and Q8W, and consistent with GUS safety in psoriasis.References:[1]Mease PJ. Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1126-1136. [2] McInnes IB. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Oct 11. doi: 10.1002/art.41553.Table 1.Efficacy Through W100 (NRI)Data are %GUS Q4WGUS Q8WPBO→GUS Q4WW24W52W100W24W52W100W24W52W100Analysis set, n245248246 ACR 50334656324855144148 ACR 7013263519283641830BL HAQ-DI ≥0.35, n228228236Improvement ≥0.35a565963505864314856BL ≥3% BSA psoriasis + IGA ≥2, n184176183 IGA0/1696362715855196367 PASI75788783798682238380PASI90617774697470107277PASI10045585945535335261BL, Baseline; BSA, Body surface area; HAQ-DI, Health assessment questionnaire disability index; IGA, Investigator global assessment; NRI, nonresponder imputation; PASI, Psoriasis area and severity index. a≥0.35 improvement among pts with HAQ-DI ≥0.35 at BL.Disclosure of Interests:Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Proton Rahman Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Janssen and Novartis, Alice B Gottlieb Consultant of: Avotres Therapeutics, Beiersdorf, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc, UCB, and Xbiotech, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Inc, UCB, and Xbiotech, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Yusang Jiang Employee of: Cytel, Inc. providing statistical support (funded by Janssen), May Shawi Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Soumya D Chakravarty Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Désirée van der Heijde Paid instructor for: Director of Imaging and Rheumatology BV, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and UCB, Philip J Mease Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim and GlaxoSmithKline, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN, and UCB.
Collapse
|
38
|
Gottlieb AB, Merola JF, Armstrong A, Langley R, Lebwohl M, Griffiths CEM, Shawi M, Yang YW, Hsia EC, Kollmeier A, Xu XL, Izutsu M, Ramachandran P, Sheng S, You Y, Miller M, Ritchlin CT, McInnes I, Rahman P. AB0528 COMPARABLE SAFETY PROFILE OF GUSELKUMAB IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS AND PSORIASIS: RESULTS FROM PHASE 3 TRIALS THROUGH 1 YEAR. Ann Rheum Dis 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background:DISCOVER 1&2 (PsA) and VOYAGE 1&2 (PsO) are Phase 3 trials of guselkumab (GUS).Objectives:Compare safety results through up to 1yr of GUS in PsA and PsO pts.Methods:In DISCOVER, 1120 pts with active PsA despite standard therapy were treated. Most pts were biologic-naïve; ~30% in DISCOVER 1 had previous exposure to 1-2 TNFi. Concomitant MTX (57%), oral corticosteroids (17%), and NSAIDs (64%) were permitted. Pts were randomized to SC GUS 100mg at W0, W4, then Q8W; GUS 100mg Q4W; or PBO. At W24, PBO patients were switched to GUS 100mg Q4W. In VOYAGE, in which concomitant MTX use was prohibited, 1245 pts with moderate to severe PsO were treated and randomized to SC GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, W12, then Q8W; or PBO at W0, W4, W12, with crossover to GUS at W16, W20, then Q8W. AEs and laboratory parameters, analyzed by National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for AEs [NCI-CTCAE] toxicity grades, were summarized through the PBO-controlled periods and 1yr.Results:Safety profiles were generally consistent across the GUS PsO and PsA clinical programs (Table 1). Time-adjusted incidence rates for numbers of AEs, serious AEs, serious infections, malignancy, MACE and AEs leading to d/c were generally similar between PsO and PsA. No cases of anaphylaxis or opportunistic infections were reported. Proportions of pts with decreased neutrophil counts and elevations in hepatic transaminases were slightly higher in PsA vs PsO. These abnormalities were mostly of NCI-CTCAE Grade 1 or 2 (<LLN-1000/mm3 for neutrophils; <5.0 x ULN for AST/ ALT), generally transient, required no medical interventions, resolved spontaneously, and did not lead to interruption or d/c of treatment. Through 1yr, proportions of pts with ALT/AST elevations in PsA trials were slightly higher for GUS Q4W than Q8W and in pts with vs without baseline MTX use.Conclusion:The GUS safety profile was generally consistent in PsA and PsO GUS-treated pts through 1yr of the DISCOVER and VOYAGE trials.Table 1.Treatment-Emergent AEs During PBO-controlled Period and Through 1Yr: VOYAGE & DISCOVER TrialsPooled VOYAGE 1&2Pooled DISCOVER 1&2Time PeriodW0-16Through 1YrW0-24bThrough 1Yr(N=)PBO(422)GUS Q8W(823)Combined GUSa(1221)PBOc(372)GUS Q8W(375)GUS Q4W (373)GUS Q8W(375)GUS Q4W (373)Combined GUS† (1100)Total pt-yrs of follow-up128255974173173172384385973Incidence/100 pt-yrs (95% CI)dAEs317 (287,349)330 (308,353)259 (249, 270)219 (198,243)256 (232,281)221 (200, 245)218 (203,233)177 (164,191)191 (182, 199)SAEs5 (2, 10)6 (4, 10)6 (5, 8)9 (5, 15)4 (2, 8)5 (2, 10)6 (4, 9)4 (2, 7)6 (4, 7)AEs leading to study agent d/c3 (0.9, 8)4 (2, 8)2 (2, 4)4 (2, 8)3 (1, 7)7 (4, 12)2 (1, 4)4 (2, 6)3 (2, 5)Infections86 (71, 104)98 (86, 111)98 (92, 104)58 (48, 71)58 (47, 71)63 (51, 76)58 (50, 66)53 (46, 61)55 (50, 60)Serious Infections0. 8 (0, 4)0.4 (0, 2)1 (0.5, 2)4 (2, 8)0.6 (0, 3)2 (0.4, 5)2 (0.6, 3)1 (0, 2)2 (0.9, 3)All Malignancy0 (0, 2)0.4 (0, 2)1 (0.4, 2)0.6 (0, 3)1 (0, 4)0 (0, 2)0.5 (0, 2)0 (0, 0. 8)0 (0, 1)MACE0 (0, 2)0.4 (0, 2)0.4 (0, 1)0.6 (0, 3)0 (0, 2)0.6 (0, 3)0 (0, 0.8)0.3 (0, 1.4)0.1 (0, 0.6)% pts with ≥1 injection site rxn3.14.55.00.31.31.11.62.41.7aPlacebo crossover pts were included in the combined GUS column after crossover to GUSbFor all pts who d/c study treatment early with the last dose of PBO/GUS prior to W24 and who did not receive any PBO/GUS at or after Wk24, all data including the final safety follow-up visit collected through 1yr were includedcFor pts in PBO group who switched to GUS due to cross-over or inadvertently, only data prior to first administration of GUS were included.dCI based on an exact method assuming observed number of events follows a Poisson distributionDisclosure of Interests:Alice B Gottlieb Consultant of: Anaptyps Bio, Avotres Therapeutics, Beiersdorf, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB, and Xbiotech, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Sun Pharmaceuticals, UCB, and Xbiotech, Joseph F. Merola Consultant of: AbbVie, Arena, Biogen, BMS, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, UCB, April Armstrong Consultant of: AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Leo, Novartis, UCB, Ortho Dermatologics, Dermira, KHK, Sanofi, Regeneron, Sun Pharma, BMS, Dermavant, and Modernizing Medicine, Richard Langley Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, and UCB Pharma, Mark Lebwohl Consultant of: Aditum Bio, Allergan, Almirall, Arcutis, Inc., Avotres Therapeutics, BirchBioMed Inc., BMD skincare, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cara Therapeutics, Castle Biosciences, Corrona, Dermavant Sciences, Evelo, Evommune, Facilitate International Dermatologic Education, Foundation for Research and Education in Dermatology, Inozyme Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, LEO Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Menlo, Mitsubishi, Neuroderm, Pfizer, Promius/Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Serono, Theravance, and Verrica., Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, Arcutis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Evommune, Incyte, Janssen, Leo Pharmaceutucals, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, and UCB, Christopher E.M. Griffiths Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Almirall, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim Celgene, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma., Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Almirall, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim Celgene, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma., Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Almirall, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim Celgene, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma., May Shawi Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, Ya-Wen Yang Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Miwa Izutsu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Paraneedharan Ramachandran Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Yin You Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Megan Miller Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Christopher T. Ritchlin Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, and UCB Pharma, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, and Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Proton Rahman Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Janssen and Novartis.
Collapse
|
39
|
Nash P, McInnes I, Ritchlin CT, Tsai WC, Leung YY, Tam LS, Furtner D, Shawi M, Xu S, Sheng S, Kollmeier A, Deodhar A. AB0525 GUSELKUMAB TREATMENT SHOWS RAPID ONSET OF EFFECT ON COMPONENTS OF AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY RESPONSE CRITERIA: RESULTS OF 2 RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 TRIALS. Ann Rheum Dis 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background:Guselkumab (GUS), an anti-interleukin-23p19-subunit monoclonal antibody, demonstrated efficacy vs placebo (PBO) in achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response in patients (pts) with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in two phase 3 trials, DISCOVER-1 & 2.1,2Objectives:To assess the differential treatment effects of GUS across individual components of ACR response in PsA pts participating in the DISCOVER-1 & 2 trials.Methods:In DISCOVER-1 & 2, 1120 pts were randomized & treated with GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W; N=373); GUS 100 mg at Week (W)0 and W4, then Q8W (N=375); or matching PBO (N=372). Pts were evaluated by independent joint assessors at study visits. ACR20 response is defined as ≥20% improvement from baseline in both tender joint count (0-68 [TJC68]) and swollen joint count (0-66 [SJC66]) and ≥20% improvement from baseline in ≥3 of 5 assessments: Patient Assessment of Pain [Pt Pain], Patient Assessment of Global Disease Activity (arthritis) [PtGA], Physician Assessment of Global Disease Activity [PGA], Patient assessment of physical function as measured by Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI), and C-reactive protein (CRP). For each ACR component, achievement of ≥20% improvement from baseline was assessed over time through W24 for the combined (Q4W+Q8W) GUS groups, and median time to onset of treatment effect was determined with Kaplan-Meier curves by randomized group.Results:Median time to response for all components except SJC66 occurred earlier with GUS than PBO. Time to onset of ACR20 treatment effect is shown in Figure 1. CRP data show 56% of GUS-treated pts had diminution of systemic inflammation by W4 (Table 1). Reduction in systemic inflammation was accompanied or rapidly followed by GUS-related improvement in both PtGA and PGA (median W4-8). Although SJC66/TJC68 data showed similar patterns, there was also a high PBO response (data not shown). Consistent with early reductions in systemic inflammation, 48-61% of GUS-treated pts had ≥20% improvement in TJC68/SJC66/PGA at W4 (Table 1), and 45-48% had ≥20% improvement in HAQ-DI, PtGA, and Pt Pain by W8. By W24, >80% of GUS-treated pts had ≥20% improvement in SJC66/TJC68/PGA, followed by 63-64% with this degree of improvement in PtGA, CRP, and Pt Pain, and 57% for HAQ-DI.Conclusion:GUS demonstrated ACR20 improvements with separation from PBO in ACR components as early as W4, which is consistent with reduced inflammation by GUS and prior serological studies.3 At early study time points, both pts and physicians were able to discern improvements in signs and symptoms of arthritis that rapidly followed reductions in systemic inflammation (CRP). The predominant drivers of ACR20 response rates at W24 in GUS pts were SJC66/TJC68/PGA.References:[1]Deodhar A et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1115-25[2]Mease P et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1126-36[3]Siebert S et al. EULAR 2020. Presentation OP0229Table 1.W4W8W12W16W20W24ACR20203950566061HAQ-DI score364552545657SJC66617484868788TJC68486575798081PGA506774788181PtGA354858596264Pt Pain324855586163CRP566062636464Figure 1Disclosure of Interests:Peter Nash Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Celgene, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sun, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Celgene, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sun, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Christopher T. Ritchlin Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, and UCB, Wen-Chan Tsai Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, and Novartis, Ying Ying Leung Consultant of: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Novartis, Lai-Shan Tam Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, and Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, GSK, Novartis, and Pfizer, Daniel Furtner Employee of: Janssen, a division of Johnson & Johnson Pte. Ltd., May Shawi Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Stephen Xu Employee of: Janssen Research and Development LLC, Shihong Sheng Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Employee of: Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Atul Deodhar Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB.
Collapse
|
40
|
Ritchlin CT, Mease PJ, Boehncke WH, Tesser J, Schiopu E, Chakravarty SD, Kollmeier A, Hsia EC, Xu XL, Shawi M, Jiang Y, Sheng S, Merola JF, McInnes I, Deodhar A. AB0526 SUSTAINED GUSELKUMAB RESPONSE IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS REGARDLESS OF BASELINE DEMOGRAPHIC AND DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: POOLED RESULTS THROUGH WEEK 52 OF TWO PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDIES. Ann Rheum Dis 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background:In the Phase 3 DISCOVER-11 & DISCOVER-22 trials, guselkumab (GUS), a human monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-23p19-subunit, was effective in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) across joint & skin endpoints. At Week 24 (W24), GUS benefit was consistent regardless of baseline (BL) demographic & disease characteristics.3Objectives:We assessed whether GUS efficacy was sustained through W52 in pooled DISCOVER-1 & -2 patients (pts) across select BL subgroups.Methods:Adults with active PsA despite standard therapies were enrolled in DISCOVER-1 (swollen [SJC] ≥3 & tender joint count [TJC] ≥3, C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥0.3 mg/dL) & DISCOVER-2 (SJC ≥5 & TJC ≥5, CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL). 31% of DISCOVER-1 pts had received 1-2 prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitors; DISCOVER-2 pts were biologic naïve. Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, then Q8W; or placebo (PBO). Pts randomized to PBO received GUS 100 mg Q4W starting at W24 & were excluded from these analyses assessing maintenance of effect from W24 to W52. GUS effects on joint (American College of Rheumatology [ACR]20/50/70) & skin (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA=0/1 + ≥2-grade reduction from W0] in pts with ≥3% body surface area [BSA] with psoriasis & IGA ≥2 at W0) endpoints were evaluated by pt BL SJC, TJC, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) use, body mass index (BMI), PsA duration, & % BSA with psoriasis. Missing data were imputed as nonresponse through W52.Results:BL pt characteristics in DISCOVER-1 (N=381) & DISCOVER-2 (N=739) were well balanced across randomized groups.1,2 Among 1120 pooled pts, mean SJC was 11, mean TJC was 21, & 68% used csDMARDs (primarily methotrexate [MTX]). At W24, 62% (232/373) & 60% (225/375), respectively, of GUS Q4W- & Q8W-treated pts achieved ACR20 vs 29% (109/372) of PBO, with GUS effect consistently observed across pt BL subgroups (Figure 1). ACR20 response rates were sustained or increased at W52 in the GUS Q4W (72%) & Q8W (70%) groups & across SJC (61-79%), TJC (68-76%), & csDMARD use (68-80%) subgroups (Table 1) & pt subgroups defined by BL BMI, PsA duration, & % BSA with psoriasis (data not shown). ACR50 & 70 response patterns were similar to ACR20 (Table 1). In pts with ≥3% BSA psoriasis & IGA ≥2 at BL, 71% (193/273) & 66% (171/258) of GUS Q4W- & Q8W-treated pts, respectively, vs 18% (47/261) of PBO, achieved IGA 0/1 at W24, with GUS effect consistently observed across pt BL subgroups (Figure 1). IGA 0/1 response rates were also sustained or increased at W52 in the GUS Q4W (80%) & Q8W (71%) groups & across % BSA with psoriasis (67-87%) & csDMARD use (68-87%) subgroups (Table 1) & pt subgroups defined by BL BMI and PsA duration (data not shown).Conclusion:Treatment with GUS 100 mg Q4W & Q8W resulted in sustained improvement in signs & symptoms of active PsA through W52 regardless of pt BL characteristics.References:[1]Deodhar A, et al. Lancet 2020;395:1115-25;[2]Mease P, et al. Lancet 2020;395:1126-36;[3]Deodhar A, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2020; Poster P0908.Figure 1Figure 1Table 1.ACR & IGA Responses at Weeks 24 & 52 & by Select BL CharacteristicsGuselkumab Q4WGuselkumab Q8WN=373N=375Week 24Week 52Week 24Week 52ACR20, %62726070 SJC (<10/10-15/>15)68/59/5379/61/6757/66/6068/68/76 TJC (<10/10-15/>15)74/67/5673/76/6962/60/6075/68/68 csDMARD use (none/any/MTX)66/60/6380/68/6862/59/5773/68/68ACR50, %34493145 SJC (<10/10-15/>15)41/32/2058/39/3834/28/2646/40/49 TJC (<10/10-15/>15)51/41/2458/53/4340/33/2652/46/43 csDMARD use (none/any/MTX)36/33/3553/46/4836/29/2751/42/40ACR70, %16271627 SJC (<10/10-15/>15)22/10/732/20/2418/10/1930/23/26 TJC (<10/10-15/>15)29/19/934/32/2227/15/1435/28/24 csDMARD use (none/any/MTX)21/13/1430/26/2721/14/1434/24/23N=273N=258IGA 0/1, %71806671 BSA % with psoriasis(≥3-<10/≥10-<20/≥20)61/71/8076/87/7962/64/7267/72/74 csDMARD use (none/any/MTX)84/64/6787/77/7872/63/6477/68/68Disclosure of Interests:Christopher T. Ritchlin Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, and UCB Pharma, Philip J Mease Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN, and UCB Pharma, Wolf-Henning Boehncke Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Almirall, Celgene, Janssen, Leo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Almirall, Celgene, Janssen, Leo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, John Tesser Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Crescendo Biosciences/Myriad, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Janssen, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Horizon, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck KG, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sun Pharma, Setpoint, and UCB Pharma, Elena Schiopu Consultant of: Janssen, Grant/research support from: Janssen, Soumya D Chakravarty Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, May Shawi Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, Yusang Jiang Employee of: Cytel, Inc., providing statistical support (funded by Janssen), Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Joseph F. Merola Consultant of: AbbVie, Arena, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and UCB Pharma, Atul Deodhar Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma.
Collapse
|
41
|
Mease PJ, Foley P, Reich K, Bagel J, Lebwohl M, Yang YW, Shawi M, Miller M, Kollmeier A, Hsia EC, Xu XL, Izutsu M, Ramachandran P, Sheng S, You Y, Helliwell P, Boehncke WH. POS1031 LOW INCIDENCE OF GASTROINTESTINAL-RELATED AND OVERALL SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS AMONG GUSELKUMAB-TREATED PATIENTS: POOLED ANALYSES OF VOYAGE 1 & 2 AND DISCOVER 1 & 2 THROUGH 1-YEAR. Ann Rheum Dis 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background:Guselkumab (GUS), a human monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the p19-subunit of interleukin (IL)-23, demonstrated efficacy in the Phase 3 VOYAGE 1&2 trials of patients (pts) with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PsO)1,2 and in the DISCOVER 1&2 trials of pts with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).3,4 IL-17 inhibitors used to treat PsO and PsA have been associated with exacerbation or new onset of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (e.g., Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis).5Objectives:Evaluate the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI)-related and overall serious adverse events (SAEs) from pooled safety data through 1-year of GUS 100 mg treatment from the VOYAGE 1&2 and DISCOVER 1&2 trials.Methods:Using pooled safety data from the VOYAGE 1&2 PsO trials and DISCOVER 1&2 PsA trials, SAEs related to GI disorders were identified using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system-organ class “GI disorders”. Pts with a previous history of IBD were not excluded in these trials; medical history of IBD was collected at baseline in DISCOVER 1&2. Rates of overall SAEs and GI-related SAEs were calculated as the number of SAEs per 100 pt-years (PY) of follow-up (95% confidence intervals). Data are presented for the placebo (PBO)-controlled period (Weeks 0-16 for VOYAGE 1&2; Weeks 0-24 for DISCOVER 1&2) and through 1-year (defined as through Week 48 for VOYAGE 1&2; through Week 60 for DISCOVER 1, and through Week 52 for DISCOVER 2). Events of uveitis and opportunistic infections were also analyzed.Results:Through the PBO-controlled period, the overall rates of GI-related SAEs per 100 PY for pooled VOYAGE 1&2 were: PBO 0.78 (0.02, 4.34), GUS q8w 0; and for pooled DISCOVER 1&2: PBO 0.58 (0.01, 3.23), GUS q8w 0.58 (0.01, 3.21), GUS q4w 0. The GI-related SAEs included: gastrointestinal hemorrhage (PBO; n=1) for pooled VOYAGE 1&2; and inflammatory bowel disease (PBO; n=1) and mechanical ileus (GUS q8w; n=1) for pooled DISCOVER 1&2. Through 1-year, the overall rates of GI-related SAEs for pooled VOYAGE 1&2 were: Combined GUS group (GUS q8w and PBO→GUS groups) 0.51 (0.17, 1.20); and for pooled DISCOVER 1&2: GUS q8w 0.52 (0.06, 1.88), GUS q4w 0, Combined GUS group (GUS q8w, GUS q4w, and PBO→GUS groups) 0.21 (0.02, 0.74). The GI-related SAEs in the Combined GUS group for pooled VOYAGE 1&2 included: gastritis, hemorrhoids, inguinal hernia, pancreatitis, and umbilical hernia (0.10/100PY [0.00, 0.57]; n=1 for each); and in the Combined GUS group for pooled DISCOVER 1&2: mechanical ileus and pancreatitis chronic (0.10/100PY [0.00, 0.57]; n=1 for each). Overall, no cases of exacerbation or new onset of IBD were reported in GUS-treated pts, including 2 pts with a prior history of IBD in DISCOVER 1&2 (total PY of follow-up for the Combined GUS groups in VOYAGE and DISCOVER were 974 and 973, respectively). Through the PBO-controlled period, rates of overall SAEs for GUS-treated pts were comparable to PBO-pts and SAE rates remained low through 1-year of follow-up in the VOYAGE 1&2 and DISCOVER 1&2 trials. There were no reported cases of uveitis, opportunistic infections, or tuberculosis in GUS-treated pts through 1-year.Conclusion:Through 1-year of follow-up with GUS treatment in pooled VOYAGE 1&2 and DISCOVER 1&2, GI-related SAE rates were low. There were no reported cases of uveitis, opportunistic infections, or new onset/exacerbation of IBD in GUS-treated pts. No new safety concerns were identified through 1-year.References:[1]Blauvelt A., et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:405-17.[2]Reich K., et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:418-31.[3]Deodhar A., et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1115-25.[4]Mease P.J., et al. Lancet. 2020; 395:1126-36.[5]Hohenberger M., et al. J Dermatolog Treat. 2018;29:13-8.Disclosure of Interests:Philip J Mease Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN, and UCB, Peter Foley Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Valeant, Galderma, GSK, Leo Pharma, and Roche, Consultant of: Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Galderma, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Arcutis, Aslan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Hexima, Merck, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, Valeant, BMS, Celtaxsys, CSL, Cutanea, Dermira, Genentech, GSK, Leo Pharma, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Reistone, Roche, and Sanofi, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma; travel grants from AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Galderma, Leo Pharma, Roche, Sun Pharma, and Sanofi, Kristian Reich Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, and UCB Pharma, Jerry Bagel Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Janssen Biotech, and Novartis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Biotech, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, and Valeant Pharmaceuticals, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Corrona, LLC, Dermavant Sciences, LTD, Dermira/UCB, Eli Lilly and Company, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Janssen Biotech, Kadmon Corporation, Leo Pharma, Lycera Corp, Menlo Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sun Pharma, Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, and Valeant Pharmaceuticals, Mark Lebwohl Consultant of: Aditum Bio, Allergan, Almirall, Arcutis, Inc., Avotres Therapeutics, BirchBioMed Inc., BMD skincare, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cara Therapeutics, Castle Biosciences, Corrona, Dermavant Sciences, Evelo, Evommune, Facilitate International Dermatologic Education, Foundation for Research and Education in Dermatology, Inozyme Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, LEO Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Menlo, Mitsubishi, Neuroderm, Pfizer, Promius/Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Serono, Theravance, and Verrica, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, Arcutis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Evommune, Incyte, Janssen, Leo Pharmaceutucals, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, and UCB, Ya-Wen Yang Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, May Shawi Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC, Megan Miller Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Miwa Izutsu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Paraneedharan Ramachandran Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Yin You Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Philip Helliwell Consultant of: Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Wolf-Henning Boehncke Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Almirall, Celgene, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Novartis, and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Almirall, Celgene, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Novartis, and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: Pfizer
Collapse
|
42
|
Ritchlin CT, Rahman P, Helliwell P, Boehncke WH, Mcinnes I, Gottlieb AB, Kafka S, Kollmeier A, Hsia EC, Xu XL, Shawi M, Sheng S, Agarwal P, Zhou B, Ramachandran P, Mease PJ. AB0538 POOLED SAFETY RESULTS FROM TWO PHASE-3 TRIALS OF GUSELKUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS THROUGH 1 YEAR. Ann Rheum Dis 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.1334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background:DISCOVER 1 & 2, two double-blind, phase-3, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) trials of guselkumab (GUS, an IL-23 inhibitor), demonstrated significant improvement with GUS vs placebo (PBO) in signs and symptoms of PsA, with good tolerability, at week (w) 24 during the PBO-controlled period.1,2 Beyond w24, all patients (pts) switched to GUS. Continued treatment maintained efficacy through w52.3,4Objectives:To describe pooled safety results from the DISCOVER 1 & 2 trials through 1-year of GUS treatment.Methods:Adults with active PsA (DISCOVER 1: ≥3 tender/swollen joints and C-Reactive protein [CRP] ≥0.3 mg/dL; DISCOVER 2: ≥5 tender/swollen joints and CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL) were randomized to subcutaneous GUS 100 mg at w0, w4, then every 8 w (q8w); GUS 100 mg q4w; or PBO. At w24, PBO pts switched to GUS 100 mg q4w. Pts were biologic naive except ~30% pts in DISCOVER 1. Safety was reported through w60 in DISCOVER 1 and through w52 in DISCOVER 2.Results:Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups in the pooled studies. Through w24 and 1 year, numbers of pts per 100 patient years with ≥1 event were similar among treatment groups for adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, infections, serious infections, and discontinuations due to AE (Table 1). At 1 year, there were no cases of active tuberculosis, opportunistic infections (including candida), or inflammatory bowel disease in GUS-treated pts; 2 deaths in PBO pts; and low incidences that were similar across treatment groups for malignancy, major adverse cardiac events, and injection-site reactions. Incidence of anti-GUS antibodies was 4.5%, and most were not neutralizing. Mild elevations in serum hepatic transaminases and decreases in neutrophil counts were consistent at 1 year with the results at w24 (Table 1).Conclusion:GUS regimens of q8w and q4w were well tolerated in PsA pts through 1 year of treatment in the phase-3 DISCOVER trials, consistent with the w24 results. No meaningful differences between incidences of AEs were reported in the q8w and q4w groups. The safety profile of GUS in PsA pts is generally comparable with the previously established safety profile of GUS.References:[1]Deodhar A et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1115[2]Mease P et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1126[3]Ritchlin C et al. EULAR 2020 # SAT0397[4]McInnes I et al. EULAR 2020 # SAT0402Table 1.Number of Patients with AEs per 100 PY and Incidence of AEs of InterestTime Period24 Weeks1 Year*Treatment GroupPBOGUS SC 100 mgPBO to GUS‡GUS SC 100 mgDosing ScheduleMatchingq8wq4wGUSCombined†q4wq8wq4wGUSCombined‡ N3723753737483523753731100Total PY Follow-Up173173172346204384385589Patients with AEs per 100 PY, n (95% CI)≥1 AE143 (123, 166)148 (127, 171)154 (132, 178)151 (136, 167)92 (77, 108)114 (100, 130)115 (101, 131)109 (100, 117)≥1 Serious AE7.1 (3.7, 12)4.1 (1.6, 8.4)4.7 (2.0, 9.3)4.4 (2.5, 7.3)7.0 (3.8, 11.8)4.8 (2.9, 7.6)4.0 (2.2, 6.6)4.9 (3.6, 6.6)≥1 Infection50 (39, 62)47 (37, 59)52 (42, 65)49 (42, 58)39 (31, 49)41 (34, 48)38 (31, 45)39 (35, 44)≥1 Serious Infection1.7 (0.4, 5.1)0.6 (0.0, 3.2)1.8 (0.4, 5.1)1.2 (0.3, 3.0)2.5 (0.8, 5.8)1.3 (0.4, 3.1)0.8 (0.2, 2.3)1.3 (0.7, 2.3)Discontinued due to AE4.1 (1.6, 8.4)2.9 (1.0, 6.8)4.7 (2.0, 9.3)3.8 (2.0, 6.5)3.5 (1.4, 7.1)2.1 (0.9, 4.1)2.6 (1.3, 4.8)2.6 (1.7, 3.8)AEs of Interest§, n (%)Death2 (0.5)0000000Malignancy1 (0.3)2 (0.5)02 (0.3)1 (0.3)2 (0.5)03 (0.3)Major Adverse Cardiac Events1 (0.3)01 (0.3)1 (0.1)001 (0.3)1 (0.1)Opportunistic Infections00000000Tuberculosis00000000Inflammatory Bowel Disease1 (0.3)0000000Injection-Site Reaction1 (0.3)5 (1.3)4 (1.1)9 (1.2)4 (1.1)6 (1.6)9 (2.4)19 (1.7)Anti-GUS Antibody+-6/373 (1.6)9/371 (2.4)15/744 (2.0)14/350 (4.0)18/373 (4.8)17/371 (4.6)49/1094 (4.5)*Through w60 for DISCOVER 1 and w52 for DISCOVER 2; †Combined GUS q8w and q4w; ‡For patients who switched from PBO to GUS, only data on and after first GUS administration were included in this group; §PBO N=370.AE, adverse event; CI, confidence interval; GUS, guselkumab; PBO, placebo; PY, patient year; q4w, every 4 weeks; q8w, every 8 weeks; SC, subcutaneous; w, weekDisclosure of Interests:Christopher T. Ritchlin Grant/research support from: Received grant/research support from UCB Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, consultation fees from UCB Pharma, Amgen, AbbVie, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Gilead, Janssen, Proton Rahman Speakers bureau: Received speakers fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Received grant/research support from Janssen and Novartis, consultation fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer., Philip Helliwell Consultant of: Consultation fees paid to charity (AbbVie, Amgen, Pfizer, UCB) or himself (Celgene, Galapagos), Grant/research support from: Received grants/research support paid to charity (AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis), Wolf-Henning Boehncke Consultant of: Received consultation fees from Janssen, Grant/research support from: Received grant/research support from Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Iain McInnes Consultant of: Received consultation fees from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Received grant/research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Alice B Gottlieb Speakers bureau: Received speakers fees from Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB, Consultant of: Received consultation fees from Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB, Grant/research support from: Received grant/research support from Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB, Shelly Kafka Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, May Shawi Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Prasheen Agarwal Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Bei Zhou Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Paraneedharan Ramachandran Shareholder of: Shareholder of Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Philip J Mease Speakers bureau: Received speakers fees from Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB – speakers bureau, Consultant of: Received consultation fees from Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB, Grant/research support from: Received grant/research support from Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB.
Collapse
|
43
|
Orbai AM, Coates LC, Deodhar A, Helliwell P, Ritchlin CT, Kollmeier A, Hsia EC, Xu XL, Sheng S, Jiang Y, Liu Y, Han C. POS1029 GUSELKUMAB-TREATED PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS ACHIEVED CLINICALLY MEANINGFUL IMPROVEMENTS IN GENERAL HEALTH OUTCOMES MEASURED WITH PROMIS-29 THROUGH 52 WEEKS: RESULTS FROM THE PHASE 3 DISCOVER-1 TRIAL. Ann Rheum Dis 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background:In the DISCOVER-1 study, the interleukin-23 p19 subunit inhibitor guselkumab (GUS) demonstrated robust efficacy across joint and skin clinical manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).1 Patients (pts) with PsA also experience a broad range of symptoms that negatively impact health-related quality of life (eg, pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, poor physical function).2Objectives:Assess the treatment effect of GUS on general health outcomes in pts with PsA in the DISCOVER-1 trial through Week (W) 52 using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) instrument.Methods:Pts with active PsA (≥3 swollen + ≥3 tender joints; C-reactive protein ≥0.3 mg/dL) and inadequate response to standard conventional therapies were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100 mg Q4W; GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, then Q8W; or placebo (PBO). PBO pts switched to GUS 100 mg Q4W at W24. PROMIS-29 contains 4 items for each of 7 domains (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, social participation) and 1 pain intensity item; 28 items are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale, and pain intensity is rated from 0-10. The raw score of each domain is converted to a standardized T-score, with norms based on a general population mean score=50 and a standard deviation (SD)=10. Higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, and sleep disturbance indicate more severe symptoms; higher physical function and social participation scores indicate better health outcomes. Changes ≥5 points (1/2 SD of T-score) are considered clinically meaningful. Analyses were performed using both observed (mean scores/changes, effect sizes) and imputed (clinically meaningful response, whereby change from baseline was set to 0 at W24/52 for pts who had missing data or at W24 for pts who met treatment failure criteria prior to W24).Results:At baseline, mean PROMIS-29 T-scores for physical function, social participation, sleep disturbance, pain, and fatigue were worse in the 381 PsA pts enrolled in DISCOVER-1 than in the general US population. Across all 7 domains, observed mean PROMIS-29 T-scores showed improvements in GUS-treated pts from baseline to W24 and W52 (Figure 1). Observed mean changes from baseline to W24 and W52, with calculated effect size, are shown (Table 1). In all pts, including those with imputed data, significantly higher percentages of pts in both GUS treatment groups vs PBO had ≥5-point improvements in fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, social participation, and pain intensity domains at W24 (all nominal p<0.05). Mean improvements in PROMIS-29 domains were maintained through W52.Conclusion:In pts with active PsA, PROMIS-29 results indicate that GUS treatment was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in fatigue and pain and improvement in physical function and social participation, which were maintained through 1 year.References:[1] Deodhar A et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1115-25.[2] Orbai A et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:673-80.Table 1.Mean Change and Effect Size of Change From Baseline in
PROMIS-29 Domain Scores at W24 and W52 (Observed)Mean Change From Baseline [Effect Size]GUS Q4WGUS Q8WPBOW0-24GUS Q4WW24-52W24W52W24W52W24W52Anxiety−3.1 [−0.3]−3.1 [−0.3]−3.7 [−0.4]−4.3 [−0.5]−1.5 [−0.2]−3.6 [−0.4]Depression−2.7 [−0.3]−3.0 [−0.4]−4.0 [−0.4]−4.0 [−0.4]−0.6 [−0.1]−2.5 [−0.3]Fatigue−4.8 [−0.5]−5.6 [−0.6]−4.8 [−0.5]−6.8 [−0.7]−2.1 [−0.2]−5.7 [−0.6]Pain interference−5.4 [−0.8]−6.2 [−1.0]−5.8 [−1.0]−7.0 [−1.1]−2.8 [−0.4]−6.3 [−1.0]Physical function5.0 [0.8]5.9 [0.9]4.1 [0.6]5.0 [0.7]1.7 [0.2]4.2 [0.6]Sleep disturbance−2.5 [−0.4]−3.9 [−0.6]−3.8 [−0.6]−4.4 [−0.6]−1.5 [−0.2]−3.3 [−0.5]Social participation4.2 [0.5]5.3 [0.7]5.3 [0.6]6.6 [0.8]1.7 [0.2]4.9 [0.6]Pain intensity*−2.3 [−1.2]−2.8 [−1.5]−2.1 [−1.1]−2.7 [−1.4]−0.7 [−0.4]−2.5 [−1.3]*Raw score; all other domains reported as T-score.Disclosure of Interests:Ana-Maria Orbai Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Company, Celgene, Novartis, Janssen, Horizon, Laura C Coates Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelehim, Celgene, Domain, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Atul Deodhar Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Philip Helliwell Consultant of: Galapagos, Janssen, and Novartis, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Janssen, and Pfizer, Christopher T. Ritchlin Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, UCB Pharma, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Yusang Jiang Employee of: Cytel, Inc., providing statistical support (funded by Janssen), Yan Liu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Chenglong Han Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Research & Development, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC.
Collapse
|
44
|
Cao L, Mu Z, Sheng S, Chen Y, Zhong G, Du X. The complete chloroplast genome of Stephania tetrandra (Menispermaceae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour 2020; 5:3819-3820. [PMID: 33426289 PMCID: PMC7759292 DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2020.1840935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The complete chloroplast genome of Stephania tetrandra was sequenced and assembled for the first time. The chloroplast genome is 159,974 bp in length, containing a large single-copy (LSC) region of 90,539 bp and a small single-copy region (SSC) of 20,735 bp, separated by a pair of inverted repeats (IRs) of 24,350 bp. The genome contains 113 unique genes, including 79 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 30 tRNA genes, and four rRNA genes. Among them, 15 genes have one intron each and three genes contain two introns. The overall GC content is 37.8%, while the corresponding values of LSC, SSC, and IR regions are 35.8, 32.4, and 43.7%, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis showed that S. tetrandra is more closely related to the clade of two species within Stephania, providing new insight into the evolution of Menispermaceae.
Collapse
|
45
|
Du X, Cao L, Sheng S, Zhong G, Mu Z. The complete chloroplast genome of Mitreola yangchunensis (Loganiaceae). MITOCHONDRIAL DNA PART B-RESOURCES 2020; 5:3812-3813. [PMID: 33367110 PMCID: PMC7682734 DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2020.1835575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
The complete chloroplast (cp) genome of Mitreola yangchunensis was sequenced and assembled for the first time. The genome is 154,665 bp in length, containing a large single-copy (LSC) region of 85,351 bp, a small single-copy region (SSC) of 18,218 bp and a pair of inverted repeats (IRs) of 25,548 bp. It contains 113 unique genes, including 79 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNA genes, and 4 rRNA genes. The overall GC content is 37.9%, while the corresponding values of LSC, SSC, and IR regions are 35.9, 32.0, and 43.4%, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses using complete cp genomes showed that M. yangchunensis is most closely related to Mitrasacme pygmaea in Loganiaceae, and Gelsemiaceae and Loganiaceae form a single cluster with high support value.
Collapse
|
46
|
Helliwell P, Gladman DD, Poddubnyy D, Mease PJ, Baraliakos X, Kollmeier A, Hsia EC, Xu XL, Sheng S, Agarwal P, Zhou B, Chakravarty SD, Shawi M, Karyekar C, Deodhar A, Van der Heijde D. OP0054 EFFICACY OF GUSELKUMAB, A MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY THAT SPECIFICALLY BINDS TO THE P19-SUBUNIT OF IL-23, ON ENDPOINTS RELATED TO AXIAL INVOLVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSA WITH IMAGING-CONFIRMED SACROILIITIS: WEEK-24 RESULTS FROM TWO PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDIES. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background:Guselkumab (GUS), an interleukin-23 inhibitor, was efficacious in reducing signs and symptoms of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients (pts) in two phase 3 trials (DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2).Objectives:To evaluate the efficacy of GUS in PsA pts with imaging-confirmed axial involvement consistent with sacroiliitis in DISCOVER-1&2.Methods:In DISCOVER-1, 381 pts with active PsA (≥ 3 swollen joints, ≥ 3 tender joints; C-reactive protein ≥ 0.3mg/dL despite standard therapies) and in DISCOVER-2, 739 pts with active PsA (≥ 5 swollen joints, ≥ 5 tender joints, CRP ≥ 0.6mg/dL despite standard therapies) were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100mg Q4W, GUS 100mg Q8W (Wk0, Wk4, then Q8W), or PBO. This analysis included pts with sacroiliitis at baseline who had either documented imaging confirmation of sacroiliitis in the past or pelvic X-ray confirmation of sacroiliitis at screening (pooled data from DISCOVER-1&2) based on investigators’ judgment of presence/absence of sacroiliitis. Efficacy was assessed by BASDAI score, BASDAI50, modified BASDAI (mBASDAI; excludes Q#3), spinal pain (BASDAI Q#2), ASDAS-CRP score, and ASDAS responses of inactive disease (<1.3), major improvement (decrease ≥2.0), and clinically important improvement (decrease ≥1.1). Pts with missing data at wk24 were classified as nonresponders.Results:312 pts presented with axial involvement (PBO, n= 118; GUS q8w, n = 91; GUS q4w, n = 103). The LS mean changes from baseline to wk24 in BASDAI, spinal pain, mBASDAI, and ASDAS-CRP were greater in the two GUS groups vs PBO (Table). Greater proportions of GUS-treated pts achieved BASDAI50 (Table) and ASDAS responses of inactive disease, major improvement, and clinically important improvement (Figure) at wk24 vs PBO.Conclusion:GUS improved axial symptoms over 24 weeks in active PsA patients with imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis.Table.Efficacy of GUS in PsA patients with axial involvement at week 24.aPBO(n=118)GUS 100 mg every 8 weeks(n=91)GUS100 mg every 4 weeks(n=103)LS Mean change in BASDAI-1.35-2.67*-2.68*LS Mean change in spinal painb-1.30-2.73*-2.48*BASDAI50c, %21/110 (19.1%)34/84 (40.5%)**36/95 (37.9%)**LS Mean change in modified BASDAId-1.13-2.16*-2.18*LS Mean change in ASDAS-CRP-0.71-1.43*-1.46*aPts with axial involvement consistent with sacroiliitis at baseline and either a history of imaging confirmation or pelvic X-ray at screening (pooled data from DISCOVER-1 & 2)bQuestion 2 of the BASDAI.cPts with BASDAI > 0 at baseline.dExcludes question 3 of the BASDAI.Unadjusted p-values as noted: *p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01Acknowledgments:NoneDisclosure of Interests:Philip Helliwell: None declared, Dafna D Gladman Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., BMS, Celgene Corporation, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – grant/research support, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., BMS, Celgene Corporation, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – consultant, Denis Poddubnyy Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Philip J Mease Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Xenofon Baraliakos Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Prasheen Agarwal Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Bei Zhou Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Soumya D Chakravarty Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, May Shawi Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Chetan Karyekar Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Consultant of: Janssen, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC. Previously, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Abbott Labs., Atul Deodhar Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myer Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myer Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma; Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV
Collapse
|
47
|
Ritchlin CT, Helliwell P, Boehncke WH, Hsia EC, Kollmeier A, Subramanian RA, Xu XL, Sheng S, Jiang Y, Zhou B, Deodhar A. SAT0397 GUSELKUMAB, AN IL-23 INHIBITOR THAT SPECIFICALLY BINDS TO THE IL23P19-SUBUNIT, FOR ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: ONE YEAR RESULTS OF A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF PATIENTS WHO WERE BIOLOGIC-NAÏVE OR TNFΑ INHIBITOR-EXPERIENCED. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background:Guselkumab (GUS), a monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the p19-subunit of IL-23, is approved to treat PsO. At Week24 (W24) of the Phase 3, double-blind, PBO-controlled trial in pts with active PsA who were biologic-naïve or prior TNFα inhibitor (TNFi)-treated (DISCOVER-1), GUS 100 mg, given every 4/8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W), demonstrated efficacy for joint & skin symptoms, physical function & quality of life vs PBO; AEs were consistent with GUS safety in PsO.Objectives:Assess GUS efficacy & safety in PsA through 1 year.Methods:Adults with active PsA (≥3 swollen+≥3 tender joints; CRP ≥0.3mg/dL) despite standard therapies were eligible. Approx. 30% of pts could have previously received ≤2 TNFi. Pts were randomized 1:1:1, stratified by W0 DMARD [Y/N] & prior TNFi (Y/N) use, to GUS 100mg Q4W; GUS 100 mg at W0, W4 & Q8W; or PBO. At W24, PBO pts crossed over to GUS 100 mg Q4W (PBO X Q4W). W48 marked the last dose of study agent. ACR response rates at W52, based on nonresponder imputation (NRI) for missing data and as observed in pts still on study agent at W24, are shown. Observed data for additional endpoints are shown. AEs through W60 are reported.Results:362/381 (95%) randomized pts continued study agent at W24 (125 Q4W, 123 Q8W, 114 PBO X Q4W), 347/381 (91%) pts completed treatment & 343/381 (90%) completed study. NRI ACR20 response rates were maintained at W52 (Q4W 73%, Q8W 60%; Fig 1A). Similar responses patterns were seen for the more stringent ACR50/70 criteria (Fig 1C,E). Observed ACR responses, overall (Fig, 1B,D,F) and in pts with (Fig 2A,C,E) & without (Fig 2B,D,F) prior TNFi use, were also maintained at W52. Improvements in other clinical outcomes were also maintained at W52, and responses for pts crossing over from PBO X Q4W at W24 were generally consistent with other GUS-treated pts by W52 (Table 1). Through W24, 4 (2%) GUS- and 5 (4%) PBO-treated pts had serious AEs; no GUS-treated and 2 (2%) PBO-treated pts had a serious infection. Through W60, serious AEs and serious infections occurred in 4% & 1%, respectively, of all 369 GUS-treated pts; no GUS-treated pt died or had IBD, opportunistic infections or active TB, or anaphylactic or serum sickness-like reactions.Table 1.Observed Efficacy1GUSQ4WGUSQ8WPBO(W0-24) XQ4W(W24-52)Data are % unless otherwise statedW24W52W24W52W24W52Dactylitis at W0,n373749444743Resolution64.978.467.379.561.781.4Enthesitis at W0,n717071647163Resolution49.362.940.856.331.069.8≥3% BSA psoriasis, IGA ≥2 at W0,n888881756866IGA 0/1 + ≥2-grade decrease76.183.058.069.317.681.52PASI7587.594.376.580.020.684.8PASI9063.676.150.666.713.272.7PASI10045.564.825.948.07.462.1HAQ-DI,n125124123114114104Mean change-0.4-0.5-0.3-0.4-0.1-0.4SF-36 scores,n (mean change)124124123114114104Physical Component - PCS6.68.56.57.32.76.9Mental Component - MCS3.84.93.05.11.84.2MDA, n125124123112114103MDA response31.240.323.633.912.331.1VLDA,n125124123114113104VLDA response9.616.94.112.31.814.41Randomized pts still on study agent at W24;2n=65Conclusion:GUS Q4W & Q8W maintained improvements in joint symptoms through 1 year in pts with active PsA who were biologic-naïve or previously TNFi-treated. In pts continuing in the study, improvements in skin symptoms, dactylitis, enthesitis, physical function & quality of life were also maintained through 1 year. GUS 100 mg Q4W & Q8W were safe and well-tolerated through study completion and consistent with GUS safety in PsO.1References:[1]https://www.janssenlabels.com/package-insert/product-monograph/prescribing-information/TREMFYA-pi.pdf.Acknowledgments:NoneDisclosure of Interests:Christopher T. Ritchlin Grant/research support from: UCB Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, Consultant of: UCB Pharma, Amgen, AbbVie, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Gilead, Janssen, Philip Helliwell: None declared, Wolf-Henning Boehncke Grant/research support from: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Consultant of: Janssen, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Ramanand A Subramanian Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Yusang Jiang: None declared, Bei Zhou Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Atul Deodhar Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myer Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myer Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB
Collapse
|
48
|
Rahman P, Ritchlin CT, Helliwell P, Boehncke WH, Mease PJ, Gottlieb AB, Kafka S, Kollmeier A, Hsia EC, Xu XL, Shawi M, Sheng S, Agarwal P, Zhou B, Ramachandran P, Mcinnes I. FRI0359 INTEGRATED SAFETY RESULTS OF TWO PHASE-3 TRIALS OF GUSELKUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS THROUGH THE PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PERIODS. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background:DISCOVER 1 & 2 are phase 3 psoriatic arthritis (PsA) trials investigating guselkumab (GUS), an IL-23 inhibitor that specifically binds the IL-23p19 subunit. In both studies, GUS showed significant improvement vs placebo (PBO) through week (W) 24 in the PBO-controlled period.1,2Objectives:To present integrated safety results of DISC 1 & 2 through the PBO-controlled periods.Methods:Adult patients (pts) with active PsA despite standard therapy were enrolled. All pts were biologic-naïve, except ~30% in DISC 1 with previous exposure to 1-2 TNF inhibitors. Pts were randomized to SC GUS 100 mg Q4W; GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, then Q8W; or PBO. Adverse events (AEs) and lab results were analyzed from pooled data.Results:The rates of pts experiencing ≥1 AE, serious AE, infection, serious infection, and discontinuation due to an AE were similar between GUS and PBO (Table 1). There were 2 deaths, 3 malignancies, 2 Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE), and no opportunistic infections (treatment group not shown to prevent unblinding). Among the AEs reported by ≥5% pts in any group (Table 1), nasopharyngitis and elevated serum hepatic aminotransferases were more common with GUS vs PBO. Laboratory ALT and AST elevations were mostly mild, transient, and not associated with significant bilirubin elevation. There was a trend to decreased neutrophil count (mostly Grade 1, transient, and not associated with infection) with GUS vs PBO (Table 2). Low rates of injection-site reactions were seen with GUS vs PBO. Anti-drug antibody development was also low (Table 1).Table 1.Patient Reported AEs, n (%)GUS100 mgQ8WGUS100 mgQ4WPBON375373372≥1 AE182 (48.5)182 (48.8)176 (47.3)≥1 Serious AE7 (1.9)8 (2.1)12 (3.2)Discontinuation due to AE5 (1.3)8 (2.1)7 (1.9)≥1 Infection73 (19.5)80 (21.4)77 (20.7)≥1 Serious infection1 (0.3)3 (0.8)3 (0.8)≥1 Opportunistic Infection (including Candida)000Active Tuberculosis000≥1 Injection-site reaction5 (1.3)4 (1.1)1 (0.3)Anti-GUS antibody +, n/N (%)6/373 (1.6)9/371 (2.4)--AEs* reported by ≥5% of patients in any treatment groupNasopharyngitis26 (6.9)19 (5.1)17 (4.6)Upper respiratory tract infection13 (3.5)23 (6.2)17 (4.6)Increased ALT23 (6.1)28 (7.5)14 (3.8)Increased AST23 (6.1)14 (3.8)9 (2.4)*Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred termTable 2.Lab Results*GUS100 mgQ8WGUS100 mgQ4WPBON373371370ALT Increased (%)Grade 128.235.030.121.12.71.43-40.81.10.8Neutrophil Count Decreased (%)Grade 15.65.93.221.61.60.83-400.30.3*NCI toxicity gradeALT=Alanine aminotransferaseConclusion:GUS was safe and well tolerated through the PBO-controlled period in 2 randomized, phase 3 trials of patients with active PsA. There were no meaningful safety differences between the Q8W and Q4W groups, no significant safety issues identified when comparing GUS to PBO, and no safety signals with regards to infections, malignancy, and MACE. The safety profile of GUS Q4W and Q8W in PsA pts was generally consistent with that in the Phase 3 trials of GUS Q8W for psoriasis.3,4References:[1]Deodhar et al. ACR 2019 (#807). Arth Rheum 2019;71 S10:1386[2]Mease et al. ACR 2019 (#L13). Arth Rheum 2019;71 S10:5247[3]Blauvelt et al. J Am Acad Derm 2017;76:405[4]Reich et al. J Am Acad Derm 2017;76:418Acknowledgments:NoneDisclosure of Interests:Proton Rahman Grant/research support from: Janssen and Novartis, Consultant of: Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer., Speakers bureau: Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Christopher T. Ritchlin Grant/research support from: UCB Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, Consultant of: UCB Pharma, Amgen, AbbVie, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Gilead, Janssen, Philip Helliwell: None declared, Wolf-Henning Boehncke Grant/research support from: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Consultant of: Janssen, Philip J Mease Grant/research support from: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB – grant/research support, Consultant of: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB – speakers bureau, Alice B Gottlieb Grant/research support from:: Research grants, consultation fees, or speaker honoraria for lectures from: Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB., Consultant of:: Research grants, consultation fees, or speaker honoraria for lectures from: Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB., Speakers bureau:: Research grants, consultation fees, or speaker honoraria for lectures from: Pfizer, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, Nordic, Celltrion and UCB., Shelly Kafka Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, May Shawi Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Prasheen Agarwal Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Bei Zhou Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Paraneedharan Ramachandran Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Iain McInnes Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB
Collapse
|
49
|
Orbai AM, Coates LC, Deodhar A, Helliwell P, Ritchlin CT, Kollmeier A, Hsia EC, Xu XL, Sheng S, Zhou B, Han C. AB0813 GUSELKUMAB-TREATED PATIENTS ACHIEVED CLINICALLY MEANINGFUL IMPROVEMENT IN SYSTEMIC SYMPTOMS AS MEASURED WITH PROMIS INSTRUMENT: RESULTS FROM PHASE-3 PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS TRIAL DISCOVER 1. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.2929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background:Patients (pts) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) experience broad systemic symptoms including pain, fatigue, depression, sleep disturbance, poor physical function, and diminished social participation.Objectives:DISCOVER 1 is a Phase 3 trial (NCT03162796) evaluating the efficacy and safety of guselkumab (GUS), an anti-interleukin 23 inhibitor that binds to the p19-subunit of IL-23, in pts with active PsA. PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29), a validated generic health instrument,1assessed the treatment effect of GUS on symptoms in pts with PsA.Methods:Pts with active PsA despite nonbiologic DMARDs were enrolled, and ~30% of pts could have previously received ≤2 TNFi. Pts were randomized (1:1:1) to subcutaneous GUS 100 mg at Week 0 (W0), W4 then q8W (n=127), GUS 100 mg q4W (n=128), or PBO (n=126). Concomitant stable use of select csDMARDs, oral steroids, and NSAIDs was allowed. PROMIS-29 consists of 7 domains (Depression, Anxiety, Physical Function, Pain Interference, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, and Social Participation) and a pain intensity 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS). The raw score of each domain is converted into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 (general population mean) and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Higher PROMIS scores represent more of the concept being measured. A >= 5-point improvement (1/2 SD of T-score) is defined as clinically meaningful.1Results:At baseline, mean PROMIS-29 T-scores for physical function, social participation, sleep disturbance, pain, and fatigue were worse than the general US population. At W24, GUS q8W-treated pts achieved greater improvements from baseline in all PROMIS-29 domains vs PBO (p<0.05) (Table and Fig 1). Results were consistent in the GUS q4W group except for anxiety and sleep disturbance. More pts receiving GUS achieved clinically meaningful improvement vs PBO except for depression and anxiety in the GUS q4W group, which were numerically improved (Fig 2).Conclusion:Active PsA pts treated with GUS achieved clinically meaningful reduction in symptoms and improvement in physical function and social participation vs PBO at W24.References:[1]http://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/meaningful-change/165-meaningful-changeTable.PROMIS-29 Domain T-Scores Least Square (LS) Mean Change from BaselineLS Mean Change from BaselinePBOGUS q8WGUS q4WAnxiety-1.37-3.23*-2.92Depression-0.85-3.4**-2.67*Fatigue-1.86-4.79**-5.08**Pain interference-2.30-5.49**-5.69**Physical function1.343.89**5.05**Sleep disturbance-1.17-3.48**-2.46Social participation1.454.90**4.52**Pain intensity-0.56-1.98**-2.32**Nominal p-values vs placebo: *<0.05, **<0.01Acknowledgments:NoneDisclosure of Interests:Ana-Maria Orbai Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Company, Celgene, Novartis, Janssen, Horizon, Consultant of: Eli Lilly; Janssen; Novartis; Pfizer; UCB. Ana-Maria Orbai was a private consultant or advisor for Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc, not in her capacity as a Johns Hopkins faculty member and was not compensated for this service., Laura C Coates: None declared, Atul Deodhar Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myer Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myer Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Philip Helliwell: None declared, Christopher T. Ritchlin Grant/research support from: UCB Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, Consultant of: UCB Pharma, Amgen, AbbVie, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Gilead, Janssen, Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Bei Zhou Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Chenglong Han Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Collapse
|
50
|
Mcgonagle D, Mcinnes I, Deodhar A, Schett G, Mease PJ, Shawi M, Kafka S, Karyekar C, Kollmeier A, Hsia EC, Xu XL, Sheng S, Agarwal P, Zhou B, Ritchlin CT, Rahman P. AB0801 EFFECTS OF GUSELKUMAB, A MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY THAT SPECIFICALLY BINDS TO THE P19-SUBUNIT OF INTERLEUKIN-23, ON DACTYLITIS AND ENTHESITIS IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: POOLED RESULTS THROUGH WEEK 24 FROM TWO PHASE 3 STUDIES. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background:Guselkumab (GUS), a novel monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the p19-subunit of IL-23, demonstrated efficacy in the Ph 3 DISCOVER-1 (D1) & DISCOVER-2 (D2) trials of pts with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).1,2Dactylitis & enthesitis, key PsA clinical manifestations, can be difficult to treat and may portend more significant disease burden.3,4Objectives:In pts with dactylitis or enthesitis at baseline, assess: 1) changes in symptoms over time and 2) relationships between improvements in dactylitis or enthesitis and other PsA domains.Methods:Adults with active PsA despite standard therapies were eligible for D1 & D2. Approx. 30% of D1 pts previously received 1-2 TNF inhibitors; D2 pts were biologic-naïve. Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100mg Q4W; GUS 100mg at W0, W4, Q8W; or PBO. Independent assessors evaluated dactylitis (total score: 0-60) & enthesitis (Leeds Enthesitis Index [LEI]; total score 0-6). Dactylitis and enthesitis findings through W24 were prespecified to be pooled across D1 & D2. P-values are unadjusted. We assessed changes in dactylitis and LEI scores over time (ANCOVA); associations between dactylitis or enthesitis resolution and ACR/PASI responses at W24 (Chi-square); and correlations between dactylitis or LEI and HAQ-DI/SF-36 change scores at W24 (Spearman’s correlation). AEs through W24 were reported.1,2Results:At W0, 42% of pooled D1+D2 pts had dactylitis; 65% had enthesitis. GUS improved dactylitis and LEI scores vs PBO at W8, W16, W24. GUS vs PBO differences were significant for dactylitis changes at W16 & W24 and LEI changes at W8 (Q4W only), W16 & W24; no dose response was observed (Fig). Rates of dactylitis or enthesitis resolution by W24 were consistently significantly (p<0.001) associated with ACR20/50/70 and PASI75/90 response (Table). In GUS-treated pts at W24, significant correlations were observed between dactylitis change scores and PASI (p<0.001 Q4W; p=0.006 Q8W) and SF-36 MCS (p=0.038 Q4W; p=0.003 Q8W) changes, and between LEI and HAQ-DI change scores (p<0.001 Q4W; p=0.005 Q8W). No consistent correlations/associations were observed between dactylitis or LEI scores and other clinical outcomes.Conclusion:In PsA pts with dactylitis or enthesitis at W0, GUS improved dactylitis or LEI scores vs PBO by W8; treatment differences were significant at W16 & W24. Resolution of dactylitis or enthesitis was significantly associated with clinically meaningful improvements in PsA joint & skin symptoms. Improved dactylitis scores correlated with improved skin symptoms and mental health; improved LEI scores correlated with improved physical function.References:[1]Deodhar A (A#807),[2]Mease P (A#L13), Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71(suppl 10);[3]DOI: 10.1186/s13075-017-1399-5;4DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.02.002Table.Pooled DISCOVER-1&2: associations between dactylitis/enthesitis resolution and joint/skin responseACR20ACR50ACR70PASI75aPASI90aDactylitis resolutionbN%pts%pts%ptsN%pts%pts Q4W37355*34*16*12178*55* Q8W37553*31*16*11680*65* PBO37226*12*5*11519*10*Enthesitis resolutionc Q4W24334*31*11*18782*63* Q8W23040*7*12*16277*62* PBO25514*13*5*18219*9** p < 0.001 (Chi-square)aIn pts with ≥3% BSA psoriasis & IGA ≥2 at W0bIn pts with D at W0cIn pts with E at W0Acknowledgments:NoneDisclosure of Interests:Dennis McGonagle Grant/research support from: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Iain McInnes Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Atul Deodhar Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myer Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myer Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Georg Schett Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Roche and UCB, Philip J Mease Grant/research support from: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB – grant/research support, Consultant of: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB – speakers bureau, May Shawi Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shelly Kafka Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Chetan Karyekar Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Consultant of: Janssen, Employee of: Janssen Global Services, LLC. Previously, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Abbott Labs., Alexa Kollmeier Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Elizabeth C Hsia Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Xie L Xu Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shihong Sheng Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Prasheen Agarwal Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Bei Zhou Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Christopher T. Ritchlin Grant/research support from: UCB Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, Consultant of: UCB Pharma, Amgen, AbbVie, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Gilead, Janssen, Proton Rahman Grant/research support from: Janssen and Novartis, Consultant of: Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer., Speakers bureau: Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer
Collapse
|