Induction therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate for 24 weeks followed by methotrexate monotherapy up to week 48 versus methotrexate therapy alone for DMARD-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: HIT HARD, an investigator-initiated study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the long-term effects of induction therapy with adalimumab (ADA) plus methotrexate (MTX) in comparison with placebo (PBO) plus MTX in DMARD-naïve patients with active early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Patients with active early RA (disease duration of ≤12 months) were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg ADA subcutaneously every other week (eow) plus MTX 15 mg/week subcutaneously or PBO plus MTX subcutaneously at 15 mg/week over 24 weeks. Thereafter, all patients received MTX monotherapy up to week 48. The primary outcome was the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at week 48. Secondary outcomes included proportions of patients in remission (DAS28<2.6), ACR responses, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score and radiographic progression.

RESULTS

87 patients were assigned to ADA/MTX and 85 patients to PBO/MTX. At baseline, DAS28 was 6.2±0.8 in the ADA/MTX and 6.3±0.9 in the PBO/MTX groups. At week 24, treatment with ADA/MTX compared with PBO/MTX resulted in a greater reduction in DAS28 (3.0±1.2 vs 3.6±1.4; p=0.009) and other secondary outcomes such as DAS28 remission rate (47.9% vs 29.5%; p=0.021) and HAQ (0.49±0.6 vs 0.72±0.6; p=0.0014). At week 48, the difference in clinical outcomes between groups was not statistically significant (DAS28: 3.2±1.4 vs 3.4±1.6; p=0.41). Radiographic progression at week 48 was significantly greater in patients administered PBO/MTX (Sharp/van der Heijde score: ADA/MTX 2.6 vs PBO/MTX 6.4; p=0.03, Ratingen score: 1.7 vs 4.2; p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A greater reduction in radiographic progression after initial combination therapy with ADA and MTX was seen at week 48, even after discontinuation of ADA treatment at week 24. This sustained effect was not found at the primary endpoint (DAS28 reduction).

[Patient/rheumatologist evaluation of infusion treatment for rheumatoid arthritis]

OBJECTIVES

The various biologic agents currently available for the treatment of RA can be administered subcutaneously (s.c.) or via intravenous (i.v.) infusion with variable intervals depending on the drug. This investigation aims to identify the preferences and concerns of affected patients and their physicians.

METHODS

We conducted a survey of 102 patients with RA currently receiving Rituximab (RTX) therapy. They were asked about different aspects of their current and previous RA therapy, including overall satisfaction, tolerability, mode of drug administration, as well as duration and intervals. In addition, 17 rheumatologists were asked about different aspects of s.c. or i.v. drug administration, their preference and the suspected preference of their patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of our patients was 59 ± 11.2 years. Patients had failed ≥2 DMARD therapies and ≥ 1 biologic treatment. The impact of RTX infusions on planning different activities including job, hobbies or travelling was considered as low or very low in 76% of the respondents. Interestingly, 63.4% of patients would prefer an infusion every 6-9 months as RA therapy, whereas 21.5% would prefer tablets only; 12.9% of our patient cohort would prefer s.c. injections every second week, and only 2% would prefer an infusion every month. In all, 92% of patients questioned would choose RTX therapy again. In contrast, 88% of rheumatologists preferred s.c. injection and even 94% of them assumed that their patients would do so as well if they had the choice. The suggested reasons included greater flexibility, convenience and independence during s.c. therapy.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to the assumption of rheumatologists, we have demonstrated a preference among RTX patients for i.v. drug administration every 6-9 months over other methods of administration.

A dose of only 5 mg prednisolone daily retards radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis - the Low-Dose Prednisolone Trial

Glucocorticoids (GC) have been used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for more than 60 years. Despite this very long experience, there remains considerable debate concerning the adequate dosing and timing of these medications, primarily because of frequent and sometimes serious side effects, particularly in high doses. GCs are documented to provide immediate symptomatic relief and to decrease signs of inflammation in active disease. At the time when the Low-Dose Prednisolone Trial (LDPT) was designed, no clear evidence was available concerning whether low doses of GCs given over a long period add to slowing of structural damage in RA. The trial was therefore designed to test the hypothesis that even a low dose of prednisolone that was thought to cause no or only very limited harm could slow radiographic progression. The trial therefore included patients with active early RA (disease duration less than two years) who received either prednisolone 5 mg/day or placebo on concomitant DMARD therapy with parenteral gold or methotrexate for two years. Radiographs of hands and feet were taken at baseline, and at 6, 12 and 24 months. Structural damage was assessed using change in the Ratingen score (0-190 scale) as the primary outcome, and change in the Sharp/van der Heijde score (0-448 scale) for additional information concerning the same radiographs. Of 192 patients in the study, 166 were available for intention to treat analysis (ITT), and 76 completed the study per protocol (PP). Progression of the Ratingen score was significantly less at all consecutive time points in the prednisolone group compared to the control group, with the greatest difference after 6 months. At 24 months the increase in score in the prednisolone group was 1.2 ± 3.5, (95% CI 0.4-2.1) and in the placebo group 4.3 ± 6.8 (95% CI 2.7-5.9) (p=0.006, ITT-analysis). This was confirmed by the results of the Sharp/van der Heijde erosion and total score with an increase of the total score of 5.3 ± 10.7 units in the prednisolone compared to 11.4 ± 19.1 in the placebo group (p=0.022) at 24 months. The LDPT trial therefore confirmed that a very low daily dose of 5 mg prednisolone given over two years in combination with background DMARD therapy substantially decreases radiographically detectable damage in patients with early RA.

Safety and clinical outcomes of rituximab therapy in patients with different autoimmune diseases: experience from a national registry (GRAID)

INTRODUCTION

Evidence from a number of open-label, uncontrolled studies has suggested that rituximab may benefit patients with autoimmune diseases who are refractory to standard-of-care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of rituximab in several standard-of-care-refractory autoimmune diseases (within rheumatology, nephrology, dermatology and neurology) other than rheumatoid arthritis or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in a real-life clinical setting.

METHODS

Patients who received rituximab having shown an inadequate response to standard-of-care had their safety and clinical outcomes data retrospectively analysed as part of the German Registry of Autoimmune Diseases. The main outcome measures were safety and clinical response, as judged at the discretion of the investigators.

RESULTS

A total of 370 patients (299 patient-years) with various autoimmune diseases (23.0% with systemic lupus erythematosus, 15.7% antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated granulomatous vasculitides, 15.1% multiple sclerosis and 10.0% pemphigus) from 42 centres received a mean dose of 2,440 mg of rituximab over a median (range) of 194 (180 to 1,407) days. The overall rate of serious infections was 5.3 per 100 patient-years during rituximab therapy. Opportunistic infections were infrequent across the whole study population, and mostly occurred in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. There were 11 deaths (3.0% of patients) after rituximab treatment (mean 11.6 months after first infusion, range 0.8 to 31.3 months), with most of the deaths caused by infections. Overall (n = 293), 13.3% of patients showed no response, 45.1% showed a partial response and 41.6% showed a complete response. Responses were also reflected by reduced use of glucocorticoids and various immunosuppressives during rituximab therapy and follow-up compared with before rituximab. Rituximab generally had a positive effect on patient well-being (physician's visual analogue scale; mean improvement from baseline of 12.1 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Data from this registry indicate that rituximab is a commonly employed, well-tolerated therapy with potential beneficial effects in standard of care-refractory autoimmune diseases, and support the results from other open-label, uncontrolled studies.

Two-year efficacy and safety of infliximab treatment in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: findings of the Infliximab Multinational Psoriatic Arthritis Controlled Trial (IMPACT)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate longterm efficacy/safety of infliximab over 2 years in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Initially, 104 patients were randomized to receive blinded infusions of infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at Weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14. At Week 16, all patients received infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks through Week 46. Seventy-eight of the 87 patients completing the first year continued into the open-label longterm extension and received infliximab 5 mg/kg at Weeks 54, 62, 70, 78, 86, and 94. The primary efficacy endpoint for the study extension was the proportion of patients with at least 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20) at Week 98. Radiographic progression was assessed by the PsA-modified van der Heijde-Sharp score in patients with radiographs available at baseline and Week 98 (n = 43).

RESULTS

At Week 98, 62% (48/78) of infliximab-treated patients achieved an ACR20 response; 45% (35/78) and 35% (27/78) of patients achieved ACR50 and ACR70 responses, respectively. Among patients with baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores >or= 2.5, 64% (16/25) achieved > 75% improvement from baseline to Week 98. The average estimated annual radiographic progression with infliximab treatment was significantly reduced versus the estimated baseline rate of progression. No new safety issues were observed during the second year of the study.

CONCLUSION

Therapy with infliximab 5 mg/kg through Week 94 produced sustained improvement in joint and skin symptoms, inhibited radiographic progression, and continued to exhibit a favorable benefit-risk ratio in this population with treatment-refractory PsA.

Does tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition promote or prevent heart failure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the hazard risk of developing or worsening heart failure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors.

METHODS

RA patients ages 18-75 years who started treatment with infliximab, etanercept, or adalimumab (n = 2,757), or conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (controls; n = 1,491) at the time of enrollment in a German biologics register were studied. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to investigate the influence of disease-related and treatment-specific risk factors on the incidence or worsening of heart failure.

RESULTS

The 3-year incidence rates of heart failure in patients with and patients without cardiovascular disease at the start of treatment were 2.2% and 0.4%, respectively. After adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, an increased risk of developing heart failure was found in patients who had a higher 28-joint Disease Activity Score at followup (hazard ratio [HR] 1.47 [95% confidence interval 1.07-2.02], P = 0.019). A residual nonsignificant risk related to treatment with TNFalpha inhibitors remained (adjusted HR 1.66 [95% confidence interval 0.67-4.1], P = 0.28). This residual risk was balanced by the efficacy of the anti-TNF treatment. When only baseline characteristics were taken into account, the HR related to TNFalpha inhibitor treatment decreased to 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.27-1.84).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study indicate that TNFalpha inhibitor treatment that effectively reduces the inflammatory activity of RA is more likely to be beneficial than harmful with regard to the risk of heart failure, especially if there is no concomitant therapy with glucocorticoids or cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors. Furthermore, the data suggest that TNFalpha inhibition does not increase the risk of worsening of prevalent heart failure.

Expert agreement confirms that negative changes in hand and foot radiographs are a surrogate for repair in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The objective of the present study was to test the hypothesis that experts recognize repair of erosions and, if so, to determine which, if any, morphologic features permitted them to recognize the repair. We also tested whether scoring by a standard method detected repair. Seven experienced readers of radiographs in rheumatoid arthritis were presented with 64 sets of single joints-of-interest at two time points, randomized and blinded for the correct sequence. The readers assessed which joint was better, and recorded whether any of six specific features were seen. Two independent readers, experienced in scoring by the van der Heijde-modified Sharp method who were not on the expert panel, then scored the complete films that included the joint-of-interest. The panel agreed very well on which of two joints was better, and, even though they did not know the true sequence, the panel accurately assigned a sequence slightly better than chance alone (58%) but worse than their agreement on which image was 'better or worse' (78%). The readers therefore indirectly assigned repair by choosing the second film as the best. Putative repair features were seen in cases of both repair and progression, and were not discriminatory. Similar results were obtained when the experts were presented with the entire hand or foot containing the joint-of-interest. In the third repair exercise, two independent readers who scored whole hands and feet using a standard method found a mean negative score in 22/60 joints-of-interest. All 22 joints were also scored as repair by the panel. Repair was detected reliably by a majority of the panel on viewing paired images based on a better/worse decision and assigning sequence in a set of images that were blinded for sequence by an independent project manager. In this test set of images, repair was manifested by a reduction in the size of erosion in many cases. Size was one feature that aided the experts to detect repair but cannot be the only one; the experts had to find other features to determine whether a smaller erosion was the first in a sequence of radiographs in a patient with progressive damage or was the second film in a patient exhibiting repair. The change in size of erosion was also picked up by independent readers applying the van der Heijde-modified Sharp scoring method and was reflected in their scores.

Outcome-Parameter bei Psoriasisarthritis

The most important and most commonly occurring form of psoriasis is psoriasis vulgaris. In the specialism of rheumatology palmoplantar pustulosis is also important. The outcome is influenced mainly by how severe and how widespread the manifestations affecting the skin and nails are. All manifestations affecting the joints and occurring in association with psoriasis are subsumed under the term 'psoriatic arthritis' (PsA). Asymmetric oligoarthritis, enthesitis and inflammatory spinal manifestations are especially frequent. PsA is a rheumatic illness with widely varying clinical pictures, most patients having signs and symptoms resembling those of spondyloarthritides (SpA) and other features of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and/or of arthrosis/osteoarthritis (OA). Clinical features that are particularly typical of PsA are ray-wise joint involvement, dactylitis and osteodestructive and osteoproliferative joint destruction. Dactylitis, asymmetric joint involvement and enthesitis also occur in other SpA. It is becoming increasingly important to define outcome parameters for use in PsA against the backdrop of new forms of treatment. In the case of clinical outcome basic distinctions must be made between clinical signs and symptoms, function and structure. In PsA the sometimes significant manifestations affecting skin and nails must also be considered. The outcome parameters used thus far have varied very widely. The extent and intensity of involvement of the peripheral joints and insertions of tendons and of spinal involvement are particularly important in PsA. In addition, functional impairments, quality of life and parameters concerned with work must be considered. There are hardly any measuring instruments specific to PsA; many have been developed and used primarily for SpA or RA.

The Infliximab Multinational Psoriatic Arthritis Controlled Trial (IMPACT): results of radiographic analyses after 1 year

OBJECTIVE

Infliximab is effective in improving signs and symptoms of joint/skin involvement, functional status, and quality of life in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Using IMPACT trial data, we assessed the effect of infliximab (IFX) on structural damage in PsA.

METHODS

Patients with active PsA were randomly assigned to receive placebo (PBO/IFX) or infliximab 5 mg/kg (IFX/IFX) at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14, with the primary endpoint at week 16. The PBO group received infliximab loading doses at weeks 16, 18, and 22. Thereafter, all patients received infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks through week 50. Hand/feet radiographs were obtained at weeks 0 and 50. Total radiographic scores were determined using the PsA modified van der Heijde-Sharp (vdH-S) score. Projected annual rate of progression was calculated by dividing x ray score by disease duration (years).

RESULTS

As reported previously, 65% of infliximab treated patients versus 10% of PBO treated patients achieved an ACR20 response at week 16 (p<0.001). At week 50, 69% of patients achieved an ACR20 response. Radiographs (baseline and week 50) were available for 72/104 patients. At baseline, estimated mean annual rate of progression was 5.8 modified vdH-S points/year. Mean (median) changes from baseline to week 50 in the total modified vdH-S score were -1.95 (-0.50) for PBO/IFX and -1.52 (-0.50) for IFX/IFX patients (p = NS). At week 50, 85% and 84% of patients in the PBO/IFX and IFX/IFX groups had no worsening in the total modified vdH-S score.

CONCLUSION

Infliximab inhibits radiographic progression in patients with PsA through week 50.

Healthcare and burden of disease in psoriatic arthritis. A comparison with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

To compare quality of life and treatment among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated by German rheumatologists.

METHODS

Data for outpatients with PsA (n = 1863), RA (n = 9627), or AS (n = 1378) enrolled in the national database of the German collaborative arthritis centers in the year 2002 were analyzed. Among those with PsA, 2 subgroups with predominantly peripheral arthritis (n = 1612) and predominantly axial disease (n = 251) were distinguished.

RESULTS

We found a high burden of illness in patients with PsA treated by rheumatologists. Among the 2 subgroups, those with axial PsA had worse outcomes (pain, function) than those with peripheral PsA. However, compared with RA and AS, physician ratings of disease activity and severity were lower in PsA. Concerning access to rheumatology care, there were similarities between AS and axial PsA, with very long disease duration at first visit (mean of about 6 yrs), versus RA and peripheral PsA, with shorter duration (1.6 and 2.5 yrs, respectively). A majority (84%) of patients with PsA were treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. Thirty percent of the patients with PsA currently were under therapy with glucocorticoids, mainly (89%) with a dose < 7.5 mg.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PsA seen in rheumatologic care have a burden of illness comparable to that of patients with RA or AS.

Effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis in an observational cohort study: Comparison of patients according to their eligibility for major randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluate the efficacy of treatments in selected groups of patients defined by strict inclusion criteria. The value of these trials in predicting therapeutic effectiveness in "real world" patients is limited. This observational cohort study was designed to complement the knowledge obtained in RCTs by evaluating the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) according to their eligibility for the major trials.

METHODS

Using the data from the German biologics register Rheumatoid Arthritis Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT [in German]), we investigated how many of the RA patients who were treated with a TNF inhibitor (infliximab, etanercept, or adalimumab) would have been eligible for the major clinical trials that led to approval of the drugs. In addition, therapeutic effectiveness was compared in the eligible and ineligible patients using the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) and 50% (ACR50) improvement response criteria.

RESULTS

Only 21-33% of the patients in the RABBIT register would have been eligible for the major trials. In these patients, the ACR20 and ACR50 improvement responses, indicating therapeutic effectiveness, were comparable with the response rates in the published trials. ACR response rates were lower in those patients considered ineligible for the trials; however, absolute improvement was similar to that in eligible patients. Ineligible patients had lower baseline disease activity, more comorbidity, and lower functional status.

CONCLUSION

RCT cohorts reflect only a minor proportion of the patients treated with biologic agents in routine care. In the clinic setting, the indications for treatment with biologic agents are not identical to the inclusion criteria for trials. Despite the smaller relative improvement achieved in these patients with longstanding, severe RA who would not fulfill the inclusion criteria of a major trial, the majority of such patients would nevertheless benefit from biologic therapy.

Bildgebende Verfahren in der Rheumatologie: Konventionelle Röntgendiagnostik bei der rheumatoiden Arthritis

Conventional radiography is still regarded the gold standard for imaging techniques in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is a very important tool for the diagnosis, the differential diagnosis, and the evaluation of the course and prognosis of the disease. Special advantages of conventional radiography are the worldwide availability and experience with the method over decades and the relatively low costs. Moreover, x-rays can be stored and re-evaluated over long periods of time. Joint damage caused by RA can be quantified by means of scoring methods. The amount of destruction correlates well with functional disability over time. The inhibition of damage progression seen on radiographs is the most important characteristic of a DMARD. Typical radiographic changes are part of the ACR classification criteria of RA. Technically, bone structure can be demonstrated with a high local resolution better than with all other imaging techniques, whereas only indirect conclusions can be drawn concerning soft tissue and cartilage lesions. This review includes recommendations given by the "Commission on Imaging Techniques" of the German Society of Rheumatology regarding technical and personal preconditions, costs, indication as well as practical performance of radiography in RA. In addition, radiographic changes that can be expected in RA including destruction and repair are discussed briefly.

Psoriatic arthritis imaging: a review of scoring methods

Structural damage assessed on conventional radiographs is an important outcome measure in psoriatic arthritis. This article reviews the available scoring methods. A full description of the methods is given as well as information on various aspects of validity.

Treatment continuation in patients receiving biological agents or conventional DMARD therapy

OBJECTIVE

To compare drug continuation rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who start on a biological agent and in a control group of patients with a change in disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment after previous DMARD failure.

METHODS

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the German biologics register between May 2001 and September 2003 were included in the study. Data were available for 511 patients treated with etanercept, 343 with infliximab, 70 with anakinra, and 599 controls. Propensity scores were used to select a subsample of patients from the control group who were likely to be treated with biological agents because of their disease severity, as well as comparable infliximab and etanercept cases.

RESULTS

Treatment continuation after 12 months was similar for etanercept (68.6% (95% confidence interval, 62% to 75%)) and infliximab (65.4% (58% to 73%)) but lower for anakinra (59% (41% to 77%)). Treatment continuation was more likely for patients on combinations of biological agents and DMARDs than for those on infliximab or etanercept alone. Patients treated with biological agents were more severely ill than those in the control group and had more previous DMARD failures. After adjustment for baseline differences, the continuation rates were higher in patients treated with biological agents than in comparable control patients treated with leflunomide or leflunomide/methotrexate.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment continuation of biological agents in clinical practice is less likely than in randomised clinical trials but more likely than in comparable controls treated with conventional DMARDs.

Sustained benefits of infliximab therapy for dermatologic and articular manifestations of psoriatic arthritis: Results from the infliximab multinational psoriatic arthritis controlled trial (IMPACT)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of infliximab therapy for the articular and dermatologic manifestations of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

One hundred four patients with PsA in whom prior therapy with at least 1 disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) had failed were recruited into this investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. During the initial blinded portion of the study, patients received infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14. After week 16, patients initially assigned to receive placebo crossed over to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks through week 50, while patients initially randomized to infliximab continued to receive active treatment at the same dose through week 50. The primary efficacy outcome was achievement of the American College of Rheumatology 20% criteria for improvement in rheumatoid arthritis (ACR20) at week 16. Additional predefined clinical efficacy assessments included the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, the ACR50 and ACR70 criteria, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, the Health Assessment Questionnaire, ratings of enthesitis and dactylitis, and the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria score.

RESULTS

The proportion of infliximab-treated patients who achieved an ACR20 response at week 16 (65%) was significantly higher than the proportion of placebo-treated patients who achieved this response (10%). In addition, 46% of infliximab-treated patients achieved an ACR50 response, and 29% achieved an ACR70 response; no placebo-treated patient achieved these end points. Among patients who had PASI scores of >/=2.5 at baseline, 68% of infliximab-treated patients achieved improvement of >/=75% in the PASI score at week 16 compared with none of the placebo-treated patients. Continued therapy with infliximab resulted in sustained improvement in articular and dermatologic manifestations of PsA through week 50. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Therapy with infliximab at a dose of 5 mg/kg significantly improved the signs and symptoms of arthritis, psoriasis, dactylitis, and enthesitis in patients with active PsA that had been resistant to DMARD therapy. With continued infliximab treatment, benefits were sustained through 50 weeks. The benefit-to-risk ratio appeared favorable in this study population.

Very low-dose prednisolone in early rheumatoid arthritis retards radiographic progression over two years: A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of 5 mg/day prednisolone on disease progression in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving standardized disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy.

METHODS

Patients with active RA of <2 years' duration were randomly assigned in a double-blinded manner to receive prednisolone or placebo while starting concomitant DMARD therapy (gold sodium thiomalate or methotrexate). Hand and foot radiographs were taken at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months and were evaluated according to the Ratingen score and the total modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS).

RESULTS

Of 192 included patients, 166 were available for the intent-to-treat analysis (ITT). Seventy-six patients completed the study per protocol (PP). Radiographic progression (increase in the Ratingen score) was significantly less with prednisolone than with placebo. The difference in the progression rate between the groups was greatest in the first 6 months. At 24 months in the ITT population, the least squares (LS) mean difference was 3.14 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.94, 5.34), P = 0.006. The results were confirmed by the total SHS in the ITT population (LS mean difference 7.20 [95% CI 0.93, 13.47], P = 0.022) and with the PP population. Clinical and functional outcomes tended to be better and the rate of remissions was higher in the prednisolone group. Side effects were observed more frequently in the prednisolone group than in the control group: weight gain (4 versus 0 patients), hypertension (6 versus 2 patients), glaucoma (3 versus 0 patients), Cushing's syndrome (5 versus 0 patients), gastric distress (9 versus 4 patients), and gastric ulcers (only with concomitant nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy; 3 versus 0 patients). No new lumbar fractures were found in either group.

CONCLUSION

The very low daily dose of 5 mg prednisolone given over 2 years in combination with background DMARD therapy substantially decreased radiographic progression in early RA at low risk.

Healing of erosive changes in rheumatoid arthritis

This is an overview over the history and present state of knowledge of radiographic signs of erosion healing. The existence of healing or repair has been confirmed; different observers agree in the identification of healing; it may be identified without knowing the sequence of the films. As healing indicates that inflammation has discontinued for several months in an individual joint, it might represent a good additional outcome measure in RA clinical trials.

[Imaging techniques in rheumatology: scoring methods in rheumatoid arthritis]

This is a critical overview of existing scoring methods including their basis, their measurement systems, their advantages and disadvantages. Conventional radiography is still-since available everywhere, interpretable and cost effective-the best imaging method to evaluate the course of RA. Scoring methods are designed to semiquantitatively measure radiographically visible changes, especially erosive destruction and-in part-cartilage loss. These methods are well validated, reproducible, and yield similar results in clinical trials. Most methods overestimate early changes and have a clear ceiling effect. Within the time frame of clinical trials radiographic evaluation is not very sensitive to change since the progression of destruction in RA is relatively slow. Moreover, small erosions cannot be detected if they are not at the margin of the bone or if they are superimposed by other bones. Within the Larsen method the definition of grade 1 by soft tissue swelling is disadvantageous: soft tissue swelling is difficult to identify on X-rays, it is a measure of disease activity and not of destruction and is quickly reversible. Joint space narrowing, measured with Sharp's method and its modifications, may be caused by misprojection due to soft tissue swelling with flexion or subluxation of the joint rather than cartilage loss. Since the measurement error of a scoring method is very much dependent on the severity of the disease of the patient population and on the quality of the radiographs, the measurement error and thereby the minimal detectable change (MDC) should be stated for every single clinical trial. Conventional radiographs and scoring methods are still indispensable to measure the influence of treatment on radiographic progression in RA. A future task will be to include in scoring methods the rating of reparative changes which cannot be scored so far.

Repair of erosions in rheumatoid arthritis does occur. Results from 2 studies by the OMERACT Subcommittee on Healing of Erosions

The committee was charged with determining whether healing of erosions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) occurs. Two exercises were performed: The first asked the committee members, as a panel of experts, to express agreement or disagreement with the presence of improvement and features of bone reaction to injury in images submitted by members as examples of healing. The second presented panel members with 28 pairs of serial images, 14 chosen to illustrate progression and 14 chosen to illustrate repair. Agreement was tested on 8 items: global judgment on which image in the pair was better, relative size of the erosion in the 2 images, judgment on which image was first, presence and extent of sclerosis, cortication, filling-in, remodeling, and reconstituting normal structure. Our results showed good agreement, among the 15 respondents, on global assessment of which image was better and which image showed the smaller erosion. Correct assignment of sequence was only slightly better than expected by chance (in 65% of the cases). Agreement was poor regarding the presence of morphologic features of bone repair. A majority of a panel of experts agreed on which 2nd images in a set of paired, serial images represented improvement and which showed progression based on global assessment of which was better and on size of erosion. Features of bone repair were not distinctive and did not enable the panel to deduce the correct sequence of the serial images. This study provides evidence that repair of bone damage in RA does occur, resulting in some degree of improvement, which was recognized by a majority of a panel of experts.

[Early diagnosis of chronic polyarthritis with conventional roentgen imaging]

Radiographs used to be the gold standard of imaging techniques in rheumatoid arthritis. New imaging techniques allow more detailed examinations of soft tissue changes, the predominant features of early RA. This could change the place of radiography especially in this phase of the disease. The best available radiographic technique is necessary to capture the changes of early RA. Radiographs of both hands and feet are needed for early diagnosis and standardized follow-up. Extent and distribution of indirect signs of arthritis (soft tissue swelling and juxtaarticular osteoporosis) vary with disease activity but can provide important information also for the differential diagnoses. Inter-reader reliability of these changes is low, thus, questioning the validity of these findings. Direct signs of arthritis (erosions and joint space narrowing) are more easy to detect and are used for the quantification of the long-term disease course, in clinical studies, as proof for the disease modifying property of an intervention. Direct signs of arthritis are also found in other diseases, so they are not exclusive signs of RA. Nevertheless a typical radiographic finding in early RA is highly specific and is the most important risk factor for a poor prognosis. Therefore, it serves as the basis for therapeutic decisions, e.g., for an early aggressive treatment. As long as there are no data that the findings with the new imaging techniques are as relevant for prognosis, radiographs cannot be replaced in early RA.

Identification of radiologic healing phenomena in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Conventional radiographic scoring methods in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are designed to quantify progression and disregard any improvement. Reparative changes observed during longterm followup of RA have rarely been described as healing phenomena. Healing may become increasingly important with the availability of more potent antirheumatic drugs. We investigated whether radiologic healing phenomena can be identified by different observers in a blinded fashion.

METHODS

Healing phenomena were defined as (1) reappearance (and sclerosis) of the cortical plate, (2) partial or complete filling in of an erosion, or (3) subchondral bone sclerosis with osteophyte formation (secondary osteoarthritis). Pairs of radiographs of hands, wrists, and forefeet [taken 2 to 8 (mean 4.8) yrs apart] of 34 patients were selected from longterm studies: 24 sets with healing phenomena and 10 with progressive disease without healing. The radiographs were blinded and read in pairs in random order by 3 observers unaware of the patients selected for the study. One observer read the set a second time after 8 weeks, resulting in a total of 4 observations. Thirty-eight joints were rated 0 to 5 depending on the amount of surface destruction. In addition an attempt was made to identify joints with healing phenomena. The data were analyzed with help of descriptive statistics such as means, standard deviations, and frequency tables.

RESULTS

Out of 1292 joints scored at the second time point, 74 had healing phenomena. These joints were identified in a mean of 89% (95/89/88/82%, respectively) in the 4 observations performed by the 3 readers. Patients without healing phenomena were correctly identified by all observers. In 54 joints less typical healing phenomena were seen in all observations. Sixty-two joints with healing in addition to the 74 joints were seen in 3 observations, 76 in 2, and 127 in one observation. All observers agreed that 1090 joints had no healing phenomenon. The 24 patients with healing had a slight reduction in the Ratingen score, while the 10 patients without healing showed a moderate progression. In the group with healing an increase and decrease in the score occurred in the same patients at different joints.

CONCLUSION

In patients with RA followed for several years healing or reparative changes of erosions can be observed. These phenomena can be identified by different observers with high sensitivity even when the observers are blinded to chronological sequence of the films.

[Outcome measurement in musculoskeletal diseases: recommendation for a core set of scales for use in rehabilitation]

By application of a standardized core set of outcome measurement instruments, comparison between studies as well as meta-analyses in rehabilitation research can be facilitated. The German Society for Rheumatology has commissioned its working group on rehabilitation with the development of a proposal for such a core set of outcome measurement instruments. In a first step, dimensions for outcome measurement in rehabilitation were defined by a group of experts which represented rehabilitation hospitals, acute care hospitals, and research groups specialized in outcome measurement. The Delphi method was used in a multiple step consensus process. In a second step, instruments and procedures to operationalize the relevant dimensions were chosen. Reliability, validity, sensitivity to change, and practicability were used as criteria for selecting measurement instruments. The main intention of the proposed core set of outcome measurement instruments is to facilitate the processes of planning and carrying out rehabilitation research studies. Furthermore, the proposed instruments can be used for clinical documentation systems as well as for internal or external quality assurance programs.

A method to score radiographic change in psoriatic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Radiographic features of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are very characteristic and differ from those observed in rheumatoid arthritis, especially in two aspects: 1) the distribution of affected joints (i.e. DIP joints), 2) the presence of destructive changes and bone proliferation at the same time. A scoring method for PsA, therefore, has to account for these characteristics of PsA.

OBJECTIVE

To develop, describe and validate a method for scoring radiographic changes in patients with PsA.

DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD

Forty joints of the hands and feet are scored for destruction and proliferation. In the destruction score (DS) grading on a 0-5 scale is based on the amount of joint surface destruction: 0 = normal, 1 = one or more erosions with an interruption of the cortical plate of > 1 mm with destruction of the total joint surface up to 10%, 2 = 11-25%, 3 = 26-50%, 4 = 51-75%, 5 = > 75% joint surface destruction. The proliferation score (PS) sums up any kind of bony proliferation typical for PsA; graded 0-4: 0 = normal, 1 = bony proliferation of 1-2 mm or bone growth < 25% of the original size (diameter), 2 = bony proliferation 2-3 mm or bone growth 25-50%, 3 = bony proliferation > 3 mm or bone growth > 50%, 4 = bony ankylosis. The DS (0-200) and the PS (0-160) can be summed up to the total score (0-360). VALIDATION OF THE METHOD: To validate the method x-rays of 20 patients with active PsA taken 3 years apart were read twice in pairs, knowing the chronological order but not knowing demographic, clinical or laboratory data of the patients. The data were analyzed with a hierarchical analysis of variance model.

RESULTS

There was good agreement between the first and the second reading of the same rater and between the two raters regarding the destruction score. The agreement regarding the proliferation score was lower but still acceptable. The reliability of the method to describe change over time--relation of progression (intra-patient variance) to the measurement error (inter-rater variance)--was 3.9 for the DS, 2.8 for the PS and 4.1 for the total score. The minimal detectable change when the readings of two raters were compared (inter-rater MDC) was 5.8, 5.0 and 4.6%, respectively of the maximum possible score for the destruction, the proliferation and the total score. These data compare very well with the results of standard scoring methods in rheumatoid arthritis.

CONCLUSION

We propose a method for scoring radiographic change in psoriatic arthritis which reliably quantifies the progression of the disease seen on radiographs.

Low dose prednisolone therapy (LDPT) retards radiographically detectable destruction in early rheumatoid arthritis--preliminary results of a multicenter, randomized, parallel, double blind study

OBJECTIVE

To test if continuous LDPT decreases radiographically detectable joint destruction in early RA.

METHODS

Patients with active RA (< 2 years from symptom onset) were treated with prednisolone 5 mg daily or placebo for 2 years in a double blind, randomized, multi-center study. At the same time in all patients DMARD treatment with either gold sodium thiomalate (GSTM) or methotrexate (MTX) was started; in the case of side effects or inefficacy the medication could be switched to the other DMARD. Radiographs of hands and forefeet were taken at baseline and after 6, 12 and 24 months. All radiographs were evaluated by one observer (S.W.) knowing the time sequence of the film but unaware of the patient identity or treatment using the Ratingen score and van der Heijde's modification of Sharp's method.

RESULTS

196 patients were included; 76 patients completed the study per protocol. Of these patients 34 were treated with prednisolone, 42 with placebo, 48 initially with GSTM, 28 with MTX. 17 patients switched from GSTM to MTX, 1 from MTX to GSTM. The mean values of the radiographic scores of both groups are given in the table. During the first year, especially during the first 6 months, the radiographic progression within the prednisolone group was significantly lower than in the placebo group: the Sharp erosion score increased by 0.4% of the maximum possible score during the first and the second 6 months in the prednisolone group, while in the placebo group there was an increase of 1.8% during the first 6 months and 0.8% during the second 6 months. During the second year the progression was significantly lower (-0.1% in the prednisolone group, 0.2% in the placebo group). After 24 months the total score had increased by 2.6% of the maximum score in the placebo group and by 1.1% in the prednisolone group. The results of the completers were confirmed by the intention-to-treat analysis (80 patients in the prednisolone group, 86 patients in the placebo group).

CONCLUSION

Continuous low dose prednisolone treatment with 5 mg daily over 2 years administered in addition to conventional DMARD treatment with MTX or GSTM decreases radiographic progression in early RA. The results of the study also show that in the placebo group there is a sharp decrease of the progression after 6-12 months as a result of the DMARD treatment. During the second year there is nearly no progression in this group. The data of the "completers" are confirmed by the analysis of the "intention to treat" population.

A new method of scoring radiographic change in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To test the reliability and to define the minimal detectable change of a new radiographic scoring method in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Following the recommendations of an expert panel a new radiographic scoring method was defined. It scores 38 joints [all proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and metacarpophalangeal joints, 4 sites in the wrists, IP of the great toes, and metatarsophalangeals 2 to 5], regarding only the amount of joint surface destruction on a 0 to 5 scale for each joint. Each grade represents 20% of joint surface destruction. The method was tested by 5 readers on a set of 7 serial radiographs of hands and forefeet of 20 patients with progressive and destructive RA. Analysis of variance was performed, as it provides the best information about the capability of a method to detect real change and to define its sensitivity according to the minimal detectable change.

RESULTS

Analysis of variance proved a high probability that the readers found real change with a ratio of intrapatient to intrareader standard deviation of 2.6. It also confirmed that one reader could detect a change of 3.5% of the total score with a probability of 95% and that different readers agreed upon a change of 4.6%. Inexperienced readers performed with comparable results to experienced readers. The time required for the reading averaged less than 10 minutes for the scoring of one set.

CONCLUSION

The new radiographic scoring method proved to be reliable, precise, and easy to learn, with reasonable cost. Compared to published data, it may provide better results than the widely used Larsen score. These features favor our new method for use in clinical trials and in longterm observational studies in RA.

Methotrexate treatment in Felty's syndrome

Felty's syndrome is a rare disorder characterized as a systemic manifestation of severe rheumatoid arthritis associated with granulocytopenia and splenomegaly. We report a retrospective analysis of a series of seven patients treated successfully with low-dose methotrexate. leading to sustained clinical improvement (number of swollen joints) and normalization of the granulocyte count for an observation period of 1 yr. Our cohort is the largest ever published with methotrexate treatment of this rare condition. Our results confirm earlier single case reports suggesting methotrexate to be the first-choice treatment nowadays in Felty's syndrome.

Problems in evaluating radiographic findings in rheumatoid arthritis using different methods of radiographic scoring: examples of difficult cases and a study design to develop an improved scoring method

Radiographic scoring is generally accepted as the "gold standard" to follow the course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Several methods have been developed to quantify radiographic changes due to RA. The most widely used methods have been proposed by Larsen and Sharp. Problems of the interpretation of the radiograph and the design of the scoring methods are not resolved. The design of established scoring methods lacks correct correlation to the amount of change on radiographs, leading to confounding of the results of the radiographic analysis. Concerns arise about the correct interpretation of findings on plain radiographs that are caused by having a 2-dimensional picture of a 3 dimensional object. There is no agreement which of the different changes caused by RA on the radiograph have to be considered and which can be neglected. Examples for these problems are given. We compared the established scoring methods of Larsen and Sharp on the same set of radiographs with longterm followup using the correct data analysis to provide the information needed to design an improved scoring method. Details of the study design are reported.