Recent advances in the treatment of localized rectal cancer

Randomized clinical trials have recently established preoperative chemoradiotherapy as the new standard treatment for patients with localized cT3-T4 or N+ rectal cancer. Although its inclusion in the modern multidisciplinary management of patients with rectal cancer makes total eradication of pelvic failure a near reality, it does not yet translate into improved survival. As a result, clinical research should be primarily directed against the micrometastatic process, focusing on integrating innovative strategies, such as upfront chemotherapy before chemoradiation, in subgroups of patients recognized to be at high risk.

Defining preoperative treatment strategies in t3 rectal cancer

Preoperative treatments for patients with T3 rectal cancer have significantly improved local recurrence rates, while survival outcomes have not changed significantly relative to those achieved with surgery alone. The prognosis of patients with T3 tumors, however, is heterogeneous; therapy should be carefully selected based on characteristics of the tumor and other prognostic indices to provide an optimal outcome for each patient. This paper summarizes key findings from several large trials that have examined use of preoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer, how these results can be applied to selection of the best therapy for an individual patient, as well as prognostic/predictive factors that have been identified and clinical tools for measuring them.

Traitements préopératoires des cancers rectaux

Surgery alone is no longer appropriate to the treatment of T3-T4 resecable rectal cancer. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy has recently been approved as the new standard treatment. This approach improves local control with local failure rate raranging now around 6-8%. However, it does not impact on overall survival. It becomes urgent to develop new concepts and a basic research in the understanding of the biological mechanisms that may explain the resistance of the micrometastatic process.

[Risk of second cancer after germinal cell testicular cancer: study from the data of Doubs cancer registry]

Testicular cancer, both seminoma and nonseminoma tumours, account for 1 to 1.5 % of male cancers. Many studies have shown that the risk of a second cancer after radiotherapy is dependent on the size of the exposure fields and the strength of delivered doses of radiotherapy. According to the literature, the relative risk of second cancer among patients treated by irradiation for seminoma limited to the testis varies from 1.5 to 1.9. We conducted a retrospective epidemiological study to measure the risk of second cancer in a population treated for both seminoma and nonseminoma tumours. The study period included patients who were diagnosed from 1978 to 2002. Data were provided by the Doubs cancer registry. Among these 291 cases of testicular cancer, we found 11 cases of second cancer after 157 seminomas (stomach, lungs, testis, ORL, kidney and oesophagus), and 3 cases after 134 nonseminomas (thyroid, kidney and testis). We found a high risk for second pulmonary and testicular cancers (standardised incidence ratio almost statistically significant). While our results are not conclusive regarding the etiology of these second cancers, they do form a useful, comparative basis for further study. They constitute the first step of a study that will be carried out on the risk related to radiation after orchidectomy.

[Second malignancies after radiotherapy for testicular seminoma: 2 cases]

Orchiectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy of retroperitoneal paraaortic and ipsilateral iliac nodes is the standard treatment for localized testicular seminoma (I, IIA, IIB). Post therapeutic follow-up allows to detect local relapse and radio-induced second cancer. Nevertheless, evaluation of risk of second malignancy still remains difficult. We report 2 cases of rectal cancer after radiotherapy for testicular seminoma.