Abstract ES04-2: Understanding nuclear receptor in breast cancer

Breast cancer cells have receptors on the surface, in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus. Chemical messengers such as steroid hormones bind to receptors, and this causes changes in the transcriptional program of the cells. Breast cancer cells may express two important steroid receptors: estrogen receptor s alpha and beta (ERs a and b, respectively), and/or progesterone receptor (PR). ER-positive cancer cells depend on estrogen for their growth, so they can be treated with drugs to block estrogen effects (e.g. tamoxifen), or which block estrogen synthesis (Cyp19 [aromatase] inhibitors or Cyp19 inhibitors which block both androgen and estrogen synthesis. Cells which express more of these receptors generally respond better to hormonal therapies.

The ERs are from a large family of nuclear receptor transcription factors (TFs). When bound by hormone (they bind to DNA directly or they can interact with other transcription factors bound to DNA to regulate gene expression. ER and PR acts by recruiting a complex of coactivator or corepressor proteins that modulate ER functions. These coactivators are important regulatory molecules, and evidence suggests that some are oncogenes, capable of causing breast cancer and showing gene amplification and/or over-expression in a ER-psositiv breast cancers, thus affecting tumor growth and treatment.

Many mechanisms for resistance to endocrine therapies have been postulated and the loss of ER over time although not common can happen. The evolution of receptor mutations over time perhaps in tumor subpopulations has also been postulated, and recent evidence suggests that they occur more frequently than once thought in ER-positive metastatic gtumors. In addition, the PR is frequently lost or altered, which can result from its activation from upstream growth factor receptors. Coactivators that are overexpressed can also modulate ER function so that tumors fail to respond to blocking ER therapies. The basic biology, function, and altered mechanism of action of ER/PR which occur during tumor evolution will be discussed in this educational session.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr ES04-2.

RNA sequencing of cancer reveals novel splicing alterations

Breast cancer transcriptome acquires a myriad of regulation changes, and splicing is critical for the cell to “tailor-make” specific functional transcripts. We systematically revealed splicing signatures of the three most common types of breast tumors using RNA sequencing: TNBC, non-TNBC and HER2-positive breast cancer. We discovered subtype specific differentially spliced genes and splice isoforms not previously recognized in human transcriptome. Further, we showed that exon skip and intron retention are predominant splice events in breast cancer. In addition, we found that differential expression of primary transcripts and promoter switching are significantly deregulated in breast cancer compared to normal breast. We validated the presence of novel hybrid isoforms of critical molecules like CDK4, LARP1, ADD3, and PHLPP2. Our study provides the first comprehensive portrait of transcriptional and splicing signatures specific to breast cancer sub-types, as well as previously unknown transcripts that prompt the need for complete annotation of tissue and disease specific transcriptome.

Identification of the activated form of the progesterone receptor (PR) in breast cancer (BC)

593

Background: Upon ligand binding, PRs dimerize and form a discrete focal subnuclear distribution pattern (FDP), which are associated with transcriptional activation of PR (APR). FDP and are observed in BC independently of menopausal status. The feasibility of using an IHC technique to characterize the PR functional status has previously been reported in BC and presence/absence of APR is hypothesized to predict anti-progestin activity. This study describes an immunohistochemistry (IHC) method, by which a biomarker could be developed to investigate this hypothesis. Methods: 303 paraffin embedded/formalin fixed archival BC samples were processed with PR-A or PR- B isotype specific antibodies. Nuclear morphology was analyzed with standard microscopy at x1000, interpretation of the IHC slides was done by an experienced pathologist. Standard PR, estrogen receptor (ER), and Ki67 testing were done. Tumor grading/stage was obtained from the patients’ records. Results: Histology was ductal 85%, lobular 13%, other 2%. Consistent with prior research observations, tumors had two PR nuclear morphologies: 1. Diffuse pattern (D) where the PR was distributed evenly in a fine granular pattern or, 2. Aggregate pattern (A) where the PR is distributed in discrete clumps or aggregates. This defined 3 tumor phenotypes: A cells only (A), D cells only (D), and a heterogenous mix of A+D cells (AD). The APRpos group is defined as the A and A+ D phenotypes. Tumors were PR positive in 76% for PRA and 80% for PRB. Tumors were APRpos for PRA in 23% and independent of PR intensity score, ER, Ki67, and HER2, but associated with higher PR % positivity and higher tumor grade. Tumors were APRpos for PRB in 22% and associated with lower PR intensity and higher tumor grade, independent of ERpos %, PRpos %, Ki67 and HER2. Conclusions: PR positive BC tumors can be grouped in two categories based on PR nuclear morphology: 1. a group with diffuse and homogenous nuclear staining, 2. a group with heterogeneous area of cells having a nuclear pattern consistent with a functional or activated PR (APR). The described IHC technique to identify APR has the potential to be developed as companion diagnostic as a potential predictor of anti-progestin efficacy in patients with BC.

Collaboration of AR and ERα in conferring resistance to an aromatase inhibitor

579

Background: We have previously shown a role for AR overexpression in tamoxifen resistance in ERα-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells; here we hypothesized that AR overexpression might similarly be involved in resistance to the aromatase inhibitor anastrazole (Anas). Methods: MCF-7 cells were transfected to express the aromatase gene (MCF-7 Arom), or the aromatase and AR (MCF-7 AR Arom cells). Western blot analysis was used to evaluate protein levels, MTT and soft agar assays to evaluate proliferation, luciferase reporter assays to evaluate transcriptional activities and confocal microscopy was used for localization. Results: Anas inhibited androstendione (AD)-stimulated growth in MCF-7 Arom cells but not in MCF-7 AR Arom cells. Similarly, Anas did not inhibit ERα transcriptional activity in MCF-7 AR Arom cells. Enhanced activation of pIGF-1R, pIRS-1, pAKT, and pMAPK were also observed in AR Arom cells, suggesting constitutive activation of nongenomic signaling in these cells. Consistent with activation of these potential treatment “escape” mechanisms, inhibitors of AKT and IGF-1R restored sensitivity to Anas. Sensitivity to Anas was also restored using the AR antagonist MDV3100, however use of Abiraterone acetate as a single agent most effectively blocked proliferation of AR-overexpressing cells. These results suggest that both AR and ERα must be blocked to restore sensitivity to hormonal therapies in AR overexpressing ERα-positive breast cancers. Unexpectedly, AR contributed to ERα transcriptional activity in MCF-7 AR Arom cells, as shown by inhibition with the AR antagonist bicalutamide. AR and ERα co-localized both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus of AD+Anas-treated cells, suggesting potential activation of both non-genomic and nuclear-mediated effects when AR is overexpressed in ERα-positive cells. We confirmed these findings in breast cancer cells with acquired resistance to tamoxifen. Conclusions: These results show the necessity to block both AR and ER in patients whose tumors express elevated levels of AR. In addition, inhibitors to the AKT/IGF-1R signaling pathways or direct inhibition of androgen/estrogen synthesis provide alternative approaches to restore hormone sensitivity in resistant breast tumors.

Independent characterization by duel staining of progesterone receptor (PR) and estrogen receptor (ER) in breast cancer (BC)

596

Background: The oncology literature indicates that ER and PR are linked and in BC the presence of PR usually indicates functional ER. BCs express both ER and PR to varying degree, but little has been published on expression of ER + PR in individual cancer cells. The goal of this study is to 1. Determine the expression ER and PR at the cellular level, 2. Determine if ER and PR are expressed in the same BC cells. If ER and PR are separate, this may indicate that antiestrogens and antiprogestins may target different cells. Methods: Archived 1° BC specimens were processed using standard IHC techniques for ER/PR testing. The procedure consisted of sequential double staining on the same microtone section, where the PR was visualized through brown staining using HRP/DAB, and the ER was visualized through red staining using AP/Permanent Red. The initial testing on 13 tumor samples utilized a duel anti-PR-A/B antibody (Ab) and an ER Ab. The next 63 tumor samples utilized; 1. anti-ER and anti-PR-A Abs, 2. anti-ER and anti-PR-B Abs. A pathologist experienced with IHC, interpreted and enumerated the cells staining positive for ER only, for PR only and cells staining positive for both ER & PR. The number of cells expected to be stained for both ER & PR by chance can be calculated as the rate of total ER by the rate of total PR and compared with the observed rate (paired rank test). ER/PR positivity is defined as ≥ 5% cells positive. Results: In the first series, 11/13 tumors were ERpos, 13/13 were PRpos, 7/13 tumors had both ER & PR expressed in 5-20% (median 5%) of the same tumor cells. In the 2nd series of 63 tumors; 1. 50/53 were ERpos, 52/53 were PRApos and 44/53 had both ER & PRA expressed in <5-20% (median 5%) of the same tumor cells, 2. 44/52 were ERpos, 52/52 were PRBpos and 42/52 tumors had both ER & PRB expressed in <5-20% (median 10%) of the same tumor cells. Areas of ER or PR only predominance were frequent. A paired rank test indicates that the observed rate (median 9%) of ER/PR duel staining is less than predicted (median 18%, p <0.000). Conclusions: ER & PR were expressed in the majority of tumors examined with a minority the tumor cells expressing both ER & PR. These data support evaluating antiprogestins as a different therapeutic target from ER.

In vitro mechanism for downregulation of ER-α expression by epigallocatechin gallate in ER+/PR+ human breast cancer cells

SCOPE

Exposure of the breast to estrogens and other sex hormones is an important cancer risk factor and estrogen receptor downregulators are attracting significant clinical interest. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), a polyphenolic compound found in green tea, has gained considerable attention for its antitumor properties. Here we aimed to investigate the molecular mechanisms through which EGCG regulates ER-α expression in ER+ PR+ breast cancer cells.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Western blotting analysis, real-time PCR, and transient transfections of deletion fragments of the ER-α gene promoter show that EGCG downregulates ER-α protein, mRNA, and gene promoter activity with a concomitant reduction of ER-α genomic and nongenomic signal. These events occur through p38(MAPK) /CK2 activation, causing the release from Hsp90 of progesterone receptor B (PR-B) and its consequent nuclear translocation as evidenced by immunofluorescence studies. EMSA, and ChIP assay reveal that, upon EGCG treatment, PR-B is recruited at the half-PRE site on ER-α promoter. This is concomitant with the formation of a corepressor complex containing NCoR and HDAC1 while RNA polymerase II is displaced. The events are crucially mediated by PR-B isoform, since they are abrogated with PR-B siRNA.

CONCLUSION

Our data provide evidence for a mechanism by which EGCG downregulates ER-α and explains the inhibitory action of EGCG on the proliferation of ER+ PR+ cancer cells tested. We suggest that the EGCG/PR-B signaling should be further exploited for clinical approach.

Leptin increases HER2 protein levels through a STAT3-mediated up-regulation of Hsp90 in breast cancer cells

Obesity condition confers risks to breast cancer development and progression, and several reports indicate that the adipokine leptin, whose synthesis and plasma levels increase with obesity, might play an important role in modulating breast cancer cell phenotype. Functional crosstalk occurring between leptin and different signaling molecules contribute to breast carcinogenesis. In this study, we show, in different human breast cancer cell lines, that leptin enhanced the expression of a chaperone protein Hsp90 resulting in increased HER2 protein levels. Silencing of Hsp90 gene expression by RNA interference abrogated leptin-mediated HER2 up-regulation. Leptin effects were dependent on JAK2/STAT3 activation, since inhibition of this signaling cascade by AG490 or ectopic expression of a STAT3 dominant negative abrogated leptin-induced HER2 and Hsp90 expressions. Functional experiments showed that leptin treatment significantly up-regulated human Hsp90 promoter activity. This occurred through an enhanced STAT3 transcription factor binding to its specific responsive element located in the Hsp90 promoter region as revealed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Analysis of HER2, Akt and MAPK phosphorylation levels revealed that leptin treatment amplified the responsiveness of breast cancer cells to growth factor stimulation. Furthermore, we found that long-term leptin exposure reduced sensitivity of breast cancer cells to the antiestrogen tamoxifen. In the same experimental conditions, the combined treatment of tamoxifen with the Hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG completely abrogated leptin-induced anchorage-independent breast cancer cell growth. In conclusion, our results highlight, for the first time, the ability of the adipocyte-secreted factor leptin to modulate Hsp90/HER2 expressions in breast cancer cells providing novel insights into the molecular mechanism linking obesity to breast cancer growth and progression.

Estrogen receptor beta binds Sp1 and recruits a corepressor complex to the estrogen receptor alpha gene promoter

Human estrogen receptors alpha and beta are crucially involved in the regulation of mammary growth and development. Normal breast tissues display a relative higher expression of ER beta than ER alpha, which drastically changes during breast tumorogenesis. Thus, it is reasonable to suggest that a dysregulation of the two estrogen receptor subtypes may induce breast cancer development. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the potential opposing roles played by the two estrogen receptors on tumor cell growth remain to be elucidated. In the present study, we have demonstrated that ER beta overexpression in breast cancer cells decreases cell proliferation and down-regulates ER alpha mRNA and protein content, along with a concomitant repression of estrogen-regulated genes. Transient transfection experiments, using a vector containing the human ER alpha promoter region, showed that elevated levels of ER beta down-regulated basal ER alpha promoter activity. Furthermore, site-directed mutagenesis and deletion analysis revealed that the proximal GC-rich motifs at -223 and -214 are critical for the ER beta-induced ER alpha down-regulation in breast cancer cells. This occurred through ER beta-Sp1 protein-protein interactions within the ER alpha promoter region and the recruitment of a corepressor complex containing the nuclear receptor corepressor NCoR, accompanied by hypoacetylation of histone H4 and displacement of RNA-polymerase II. Silencing of NCoR gene expression by RNA interference reversed the down-regulatory effects of ER beta on ER alpha gene expression and cell proliferation. Our results provide evidence for a novel mechanism by which overexpression of ER beta through NCoR is able to down regulate ER alpha gene expression, thus blocking ER alpha's driving role on breast cancer cell growth.

Transcriptomic landscape of breast cancers through mRNA sequencing

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with a poorly defined genetic landscape, which poses a major challenge in diagnosis and treatment. By massively parallel mRNA sequencing, we obtained 1.2 billion reads from 17 individual human tissues belonging to TNBC, Non-TNBC, and HER2-positive breast cancers and defined their comprehensive digital transcriptome for the first time. Surprisingly, we identified a high number of novel and unannotated transcripts, revealing the global breast cancer transcriptomic adaptations. Comparative transcriptomic analyses elucidated differentially expressed transcripts between the three breast cancer groups, identifying several new modulators of breast cancer. Our study also identified common transcriptional regulatory elements, such as highly abundant primary transcripts, including osteonectin, RACK1, calnexin, calreticulin, FTL, and B2M, and "genomic hotspots" enriched in primary transcripts between the three groups. Thus, our study opens previously unexplored niches that could enable a better understanding of the disease and the development of potential intervention strategies.

Leptin mediates tumor-stromal interactions that promote the invasive growth of breast cancer cells

Obesity confers risks to cancer development and progression but the mechanisms underlying these risks remain unclear. In this study, we identify a role for the obesity cytokine leptin, which has been implicated previously in breast cancer development, as a determinant for the tumor-promoting activity of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) in both wild-type (WT) and K303R mutant estrogen receptor-α (ERα)-expressing breast cancer cells. Human CAFs stimulated a greater increase in the proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells expressing the K303R-ERα hyperactive receptor than WT-ERα-expressing cells. A concomitant increase was seen in leptin receptor isoform expression and activation of the leptin signaling pathway in cells expressing K303R-ERα compared with WT-ERα, correlating with leptin effects on cell growth, motility, and invasiveness in mutant cells. Epidermal growth factor and other factors secreted by K303R-ERα cells stimulated CAF proliferation, migration, and subsequent leptin secretion. Moreover, K303R-ERα expression generated a leptin hypersensitive phenotype in vivo. Together, our results reveal a bidirectional cross-talk between breast cancer cells and "educated" CAFs that drives tumor progression via leptin signaling. In elucidating a mechanism that connects obesity and cancer, these findings reinforce the concept that blocking cancer-stromal cell communication may represent an effective strategy for targeted therapy of breast cancer.

P1-12-04: EBP50 – A Novel Biomarker for Resistance to Endocrine and HER2−Targeted Therapies in Breast Cancer

Background: Therapeutic strategies directed at inhibiting the action of ERa using antiestrogens, such as tamoxifen (Tam), or inhibiting HER2 signalling using a monoclonal antibody-Trastuzumab (Tras) are the standard therapies offered to women with ERa or ERa/HER2−positive cancer. However, not all patients respond to these targeted therapies, and a large number of patients who do respond will eventually develop disease progression or recurrence while on therapy. EBP50 functions as a molecular scaffold to coordinate a diverse range of regulatory processes and a number of studies suggest a role for EBP50 in cancer progression.

Material and Methods: Microarray profiling was used to identify genes associated with response to tamoxifen in primary as compared to metastatic breast tumor recurrences. Stable transfection of EBP50 shRNA was performed in ZR75B and BT-474 cells. Cell response to Tam and/or Tras was evaluated using soft agar and MTT growth assays. The molecular signaling pathways affected by EBP50 knockdown were explored using immunoblot, and immunoprecipitation. Cellular localization was determined using confocal microscopy. Mammosphere potential was used to evaluate the stem cell renewal capacity in BT-474 cells.

Results: The mean levels of EBP50 were reduced in the tamoxifen-resistant, metastatic breast tumors compared to tamoxifen-sensitive tumors. Knockdown of EBP50 levels decreased Tam sensitivity in ZR75B cells. Thus reduction in EBP50 levels analygous to that discovered in resistant patients, conferred resistance to the growth inhibitory effects of Tam. Cells with knockdown of EBP50 (shEBP50 cells) showed higher levels of phosphorylated HER2, EGFR and HER3, as well as their downstream signalling pathways. PI3K and AKT inhibitors were able to restore Tam sensitivity in shEBP50 cells. After long term treatment of ZR75-B cells with Tam resulted in decreased endogenous levels of EBP50, suggesting that only cells evolving with lower EBP50 levels were able to survive Tam treatment. Similarly, knockdown EBP50 in ERa/HER2 positive BT-474 cells significantly increased phosphorylated HER2 and these cells were resistant not only to Tam, but also to Tras treatment. BT-474 cells acquired Tras resistance concomittant with decreased EBP50 levels in a dose-dependent manner respective to parental cells. Interestingly, shEBP50 cells demonstrated an enhanced capacity to form mammospheres compared to vector control cells. We demonstrate that EBP50 is able to bind HER2 using immunoprecipitation, suggesting that EBP50 interacts directly with HER2. Confocal microscope analysis demonstrated the colocalization of these two proteins. Inhibitors to c-Src, PI3K, AKT and EGFR were used in combination with Tras; shEBP50 cells were sensitive to both PI3K and AKT inhibitors, and EGFR inhibitors were able to restore Tras sensitivity.

Discussion: Our data suggest that EBP50 is a novel negative regulator of HER2 signaling, and its loss conferred resistance to both Tam and Tras. EBP50 loss might function to stabilize HER2, and enhance dimerization with EGFR and HER3. We hypothesize that EBP50 levels might be a new predictive biomarker for targeted therapy; patients with low EBP50 levels might best be treated with a combination of therapies including PI3K/AKT inhibitors.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-04.

PD01-07: AR Overexpression and Aromatase Inhibitor Resistance in Breast Cancer

Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have emerged as the therapy of choice for the treatment of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive breast cancer. However, many patients develop resistance to AI treatment. Although the involvement of the ERα in AI resistance is well established, the role of the androgen receptor (AR) is not known. It has been estimated that about 60%-70% of ERα-positive breast cancer co-express the AR, and that AR agonists can either inhibit or stimulate breast cancer cell proliferation. Thus it is important to determine if there are biomarkers predicting AR's effects in breast tumors. We have previously shown a role for AR-overexpression in tamoxifen resistance in ERα-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells; here we hypothesized that AR overexpression might similarly be involved in resistance to the AI anastrazole (Anas).

Materials and Methods: Stable transfection of MCF-7 cells was performed to generate cell lines that express the aromatase gene (MCF-7 BK Arom) and then co-transfected with an AR expression vector (MCF-7 AR Arom). Aromatase and AR expression levels were evaluated by western blot analysis, and the enzyme activity was evaluated using aromatase activity assays. Proliferation was tested using anchorage independent soft agar assays and MTT in the presence of the androgen substrate androstenedione (AD), or AD plus Anas. ERα and AR transcriptional activities were tested with ERE-luciferase reporter assays. Localization of ERα and AR within the cells was visualized using immunofluorescence microscopy.

Results: ERα-positive MCF-7 cells were stably transfected with either aromatase, or aromatase plus AR. MCF-7 aromatase clones overexpressing AR were resistant to the growth inhibitory effects of Anas when stimulated with the androgen AD. Resistance was not mediated through changes in aromatase expression or activity. The growth of several of the AR Arom-overexpressing cells was stimulated with treatment of Anas alone, suggesting that Anas was acting as an agonist. As expected, AD treatment stimulated ERα transcriptional activity, but Anas was unable to block AD-stimulated activity in AR Arom-overexpressing cells using ERE-Luciferase reporter assay. Anas was able to enhance AR and ERα colocalization in AR-overxpressing cells. Resistance was not associated with activation of known mechanisms of resistance, such as HER2, IGF-1R, or MAPK. However AR-overexpressing cells had higher constitutive phosphorylation of Akt. Accordingly, resistance to Anas was blocked using an Akt1/2 inhibitor.

Conclusion: Using a model of ERα-positive breast cancer cells expressing exogenous aromatase and AR, we have demonstrated that AR overexpression confers resistance to the AI Anas. These results suggest that in patients recurring on hormonal therapy whose tumors express elevated levels of AR, targeted therapy to Akt might restore hormone sensitivity.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD01-07.

Dicer-mediated upregulation of BCRP confers tamoxifen resistance in human breast cancer cells

PURPOSE

Tamoxifen (Tam) is the most prescribed hormonal agent for treatment of estrogen receptor α (ERα)-positive breast cancer patients. Using microarray analysis, we observed that metastatic breast tumors resistant to Tam therapy had elevated levels of Dicer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We overexpressed Dicer in ERα-positive MCF-7 human breast cancer cells and observed a concomitant increase in expression of the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). We thus hypothesized that Tam resistance associated with Dicer overexpression in ERα-positive breast cancer cells may involve BCRP. We analyzed BCRP function in Dicer-overexpressing cells using growth in soft agar and mammosphere formation and evaluated intracellular Tam efflux.

RESULTS

In the presence of Tam, Dicer-overexpressing cells formed resistant colonies in soft agar, and treatment with BCRP inhibitors restored Tam sensitivity. Tumor xenograft studies confirmed that Dicer-overexpressing cells were resistant to Tam in vivo. Tumors and distant metastases could be initiated with as few as five mammosphere cells from both vector and Dicer-overexpressing cells, indicating that the mammosphere assay selected for cells with enhanced tumor-initiating and metastatic capacity. Dicer-overexpressing cells with elevated levels of BCRP effluxed Tam more efficiently than control cells, and BCRP inhibitors were able to inhibit efflux.

CONCLUSION

Dicer-overexpressing breast cancer cells enriched for cells with enhanced BCRP function. We hypothesize that it is this population which may be involved in the emergence of Tam-resistant growth. BCRP may be a novel clinical target to restore Tam sensitivity.

Resveratrol, through NF-Y/p53/Sin3/HDAC1 complex phosphorylation, inhibits estrogen receptor alpha gene expression via p38MAPK/CK2 signaling in human breast cancer cells

Agents to counteract acquired resistance to hormonal therapy for breast cancer would substantially enhance the long-term benefits of hormonal therapy. In the present study, we demonstrate how resveratrol (Res) inhibits human breast cancer cell proliferation, including MCF-7 tamoxifen-resistant cells (IC(50) values for viability were in the 30-45 μM range). We show that Res, through p38(MAPK) phosphorylation, causes induction of p53, which recruits at the estrogen receptor α (ERα) proximal promoter, leading to an inhibition of ERα expression in terms of mRNA and protein content. These events appear specifically p53 dependent, since they are drastically abrogated with p53-targeting siRNA. Coimmunoprecipitation assay showed specific interaction between p53, the Sin3A corepressor, and histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), which was phosphorylated. The enhancement of the tripartite complex p53/Sin3A/HDAC1, together with NF-Y on Res treatment, was confirmed by chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses, with a concomitant release of Sp1 and RNA polymerase II, thereby inhibiting the cell transcriptional machinery. The persistence of such effects in MCF-7 tamoxifen-resistant cells at a higher extent than parental MCF-7 cells addresses how Res may be considered a useful pharmacological tool to be exploited in the adjuvant settings for treatment of breast cancer developing hormonal resistance.

Farnesoid X receptor inhibits tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7 breast cancer cell growth through downregulation of HER2 expression

Tamoxifen (Tam) treatment is a first-line endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-α-positive breast cancer patients. Unfortunately, resistance frequently occurs and is often related with overexpression of the membrane tyrosine kinase receptor HER2. This is the rationale behind combined treatments with endocrine therapy and novel inhibitors that reduce HER2 expression and signaling and thus inhibit Tam-resistant breast cancer cell growth. In this study, we show that activation of farnesoid X receptor (FXR), by the primary bile acid chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) or the synthetic agonist GW4064, inhibited growth of Tam-resistant breast cancer cells (termed MCF-7 TR1), which was used as an in vitro model of acquired Tam resistance. Our results demonstrate that CDCA treatment significantly reduced both anchorage-dependent and anchorage-independent epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced growth in MCF-7 TR1 cells. Furthermore, results from western blot analysis and real-time reverse transcription-PCR revealed that CDCA treatment reduced HER2 expression and inhibited EGF-mediated HER2 and p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation in these Tam-resistant breast cancer cells. Transient transfection experiments, using a vector containing the human HER2 promoter region, showed that CDCA treatment downregulated basal HER2 promoter activity. This occurred through an inhibition of nuclear factor-κB transcription factor binding to its specific responsive element located in the HER2 promoter region as revealed by mutagenesis studies, electrophoretic mobility shift assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis. Collectively, these data suggest that FXR ligand-dependent activity, blocking HER2/MAPK signaling, may overcome anti-estrogen resistance in human breast cancer cells and could represent a new therapeutic tool to treat breast cancer patients that develop resistance.

Abstract 940: AR overexpression confers resistance to an aromatase inhibitor in ERα-positive breast cancer cells

Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have emerged as the therapy of choice for the treatment of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive breast cancer. However, many patients develop resistance to AI treatment. Although the involvement of the ERα in AI resistance is well established, the role of the androgen receptor (AR) is not known. It has been estimated that about 60%-70% of ERα-positive breast cancer co-express the AR, and we have previously shown a role for AR-overexpression in tamoxifen resistance in ERα-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Thus we hypothesized that AR overexpression might similarly be involved in resistance to the AI anastrazole (Anas).

Materials and Methods: Stable transfection of MCF-7 cells was performed to generate cell lines that express the aromatase gene (MCF-7 BK Arom) and then co-transfected with an AR expression vector (MCF-7 AR Arom). Aromatase and AR expression levels were evaluated by western blot analysis. Proliferation was tested using anchorage independent soft agar assays and MTT in the presence of the androgen substrate androstenedione (AD), or AD plus Anas. ERα and AR transcriptional activities were tested with ERE-luciferase reporter assays.

Results: Several clones expressing aromatase alone or aromatase plus AR were generated. MCF-7 aromatase clones overexpressing AR were resistant to the growth inhibitory effects of Anas when stimulated with the androgen AD. As expected AD treatment stimulated ERα transcriptional activity, but Anas was unable to block AD-stimulated activity in AR Arom-overexpressing cells. In addition, the growth of several of the AR Arom-overexpressing cells was stimulated with treatment of Anas alone. Resistance was not associated with activation of known mechanisms of resistance, such as HER2, or Akt activation. Inhibitors of various signaling and receptor growth pathways are currently being tested for their effects on blocking Anas resistance.

Conclusion: Using a model of ERα-positive breast cancer cells expressing endogenous aromatase and AR, we have demonstrated that AR overexpression confers resistance to the AI Anas.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 940. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-940

Loss of Rho GDIα and resistance to tamoxifen via effects on estrogen receptor α

BACKGROUND

Estrogen receptor (ER) α is a successful therapeutic target in breast cancer, but patients eventually develop resistance to antiestrogens such as tamoxifen.

METHODS

To identify genes whose expression was associated with the development of tamoxifen resistance and metastasis, we used microarrays to compare gene expression in four primary tumors from tamoxifen-treated patients whose breast cancers did not recur vs five metastatic tumors from patients whose cancers progressed during adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. Because Rho guanine dissociation inhibitor (GDI) α was underexpressed in the tamoxifen-resistant group, we stably transfected ERα-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells with a plasmid encoding a short hairpin (sh) RNA to silence Rho GDIα expression. We used immunoblots and transcription assays to examine the role of Rho GDIα in ER-related signaling and growth of cells in vitro and as xenografts in treated nude mice (n = 8-9 per group) to examine the effects of Rho GDIα blockade on hormone responsiveness and metastatic behavior. The time to tumor tripling as the time in weeks from randomization to a threefold increase in total tumor volume over baseline was examined in treated mice. The associations of Rho GDIα and MTA2 levels with tamoxifen resistance were examined in microarray data from patients. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Rho GDIα was expressed at lower levels in ERα-positive tumors that recurred during tamoxifen treatment than in ERα-positive tamoxifen-sensitive primary tumors. MCF-7 breast cancer cells in which Rho GDIα expression had been silenced were tamoxifen-resistant, had increased Rho GTPase and p21-activated kinase 1 activity, increased phosphorylation of ERα at serine 305, and enhanced tamoxifen-induced ERα transcriptional activity compared with control cells. MCF-7 cells in which Rho GDIα expression was silenced metastasized with high frequency when grown as tumor xenografts. When mice were treated with estrogen or estrogen withdrawal, tripling times for xenografts from cells with Rho GDIα silencing were similar to those from vector-containing control cells; however, tripling times were statistically significantly faster than control when mice were treated with tamoxifen (median tripling time for tumors with Rho GDIα small interfering RNA = 2.34 weeks; for control tumors = not reached, hazard ratio = 4.13, 95% confidence interval = 1.07 to 15.96, P = .040 [adjusted for multiple comparisons, P = .119]). Levels of the metastasis-associated protein MTA2 were also increased upon Rho GDIα silencing, and combined Rho GDIα and MTA2 levels were associated with recurrence in 250 tamoxifen-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Loss of Rho GDIα enhances metastasis and resistance to tamoxifen via effects on both ERα and MTA2 in models of ERα-positive breast cancer and in tumors of tamoxifen-treated patients.

Abstract PD05-12: Combination of Notch Inhibitor MK-0752 and Endocrine Therapy for Early Stage ERα + Breast Cancer in a Presurgical Window Pilot Study

Background: Breast tumor initiating cells (TIC) use Notch receptors/ligands with other pathways for self renewal, resulting in tumor proliferation and progression. We showed that Notch inhibition with gamma secretase inhibitors (GSI) potentiates the effects of tamoxifen (tam) in xenografts (Rizzo et al. Cancer Res 2008). It is unknown whether GSIs plus endocrine therapy result in modulation of Notch and other proliferation markers in human breast cancer. Our objective was to add short exposure of the GSI MK-0752 to ongoing tam or letrozole (letr) during the presurgical window to determine 1) feasibility, 2) safety/tolerance, and 3) impact on biomarkers. We report the initial cohort of this pilot study (ClinTrials. gov NCT00756717).

Methods: Patients (pts) with early stage ERα + breast cancer were treated with 25 days of tam or letr. On day 15 MK-0752 was added to endocrine therapy (350 mg orally 3 days on, 4 days off, 3 days on), with definitive surgery day 25. Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded biopsies were obtained at baseline, day 14 and final surgery, with histologic confirmation of tumor content &gt;50% and RNA extraction by standard methods. Q-PCR was done for Notch1, Notch3, Notch4, Deltex, Jagged1, c-myc, HEY1, HEY2, HES1, PS2, C-Myc, Cyclin A2, NOXA (pro-apoptotic protein), Ki67, Dicer-1, RPL13 (internal control). Ct averages for 3 replicates were used and mRNA levels were calculated by the 2ΔΔCt method. Baseline gene expression levels were used as comparators for days 14 and 25 levels in each pt. The first cohort of 10 pts was analyzed to determine if enough signals were present to justify expanding the cohort at this dose to 20 pts and possibly test a second cohort on an alternate MK-0752 dose/schedule. Results: The initial cohort of 10 pts completed all therapy (4 tam, 6 letr), all biopsies and definitive surgery on schedule. One other pt withdrew prior to starting MK-0752 due to hypertension. Toxicity was minimal: grade 1 periorbital edema/cough, nausea, and axillary paresthesias in 1 pt each; grade 1 facial rash, 2 pts; and grade 2 fatigue, 1 pt. There was no diarrhea or surgical complications. Significant changes occurred in molecular marker levels after MK-0752 plus tam/letr (day 25) vs. end of tam/letr alone (day 14) as follows: Ki67 mRNA decreased in 9/10 pts; Notch4 decreased, 10/10; NOXA increased, 6/10; and Notch1 decreased, 6/10. Other markers showed inter-individual variations and will be presented, along with results of the global gene expression profiling (in progress). Conclusions: The addition of a short exposure of the GSI MK-0752 to ongoing endocrine therapy was feasible, safe, and well tolerated in pts with ERα + early breast cancer prior to definitive surgery. It results in anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects at the molecular level. Notch4, which plays a key role in breast TIC, was the most consistent molecular marker of response in this setting. This suggests a potential anti-TIC effect of this combination and a role in overcoming endocrine resistance. Accrual to the expanded cohort is underway. If findings are confirmed, the second study with alternate MK-0752 dose/schedule may commence. Funding: Swim Across America, Inc. (clinical trial costs); Merck (drug supply, profiling)

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-12.

Estrogen receptor mutations and changes in downstream gene expression and signaling

Estrogens play a crucial role in regulating the growth and differentiation of breast cancers, with approximately two thirds of all breast tumors expressing the estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha). Therefore, therapeutic strategies directed at inhibiting the action of ERalpha by using anti-estrogens such as tamoxifen, or reducing estrogens levels by using aromatase inhibitors, such as letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane, are the standard treatments offered to women with ERalpha-positive cancer. However, not all patients respond to endocrine therapies (termed de novo resistance), and a large number of patients who do respond will eventually develop disease progression or recurrence while on therapy (acquired resistance). Recently, variant forms of the receptor have been identified owing to alternative splicing or gene mutation. This article reviews these variant receptors and their clinical relevance in resistance to endocrine therapy, by addressing their molecular cross-talk with growth factor receptors and signaling components. Understanding the complexity of receptor-mediated signaling has promise for new combined therapeutic options that focus on more efficient blockade of receptor cross-talk.

Identification of a novel estrogen receptor-alpha variant and its upstream splicing regulator

Alternative splicing of precursor mRNA is a fundamental mechanism to generate multiple proteins from a single gene. Although constitutive and alternative mRNA splicing is temporally and spatially regulated, deregulation of mRNA splicing could cause development, progression, and metastasis of tumors. Through yeast two-hybrid screening of a human breast cDNA library using estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) as bait, we identified a novel nuclear receptor box containing full-length protein, nuclear protein E3-3 (NPE3-3). Our results revealed that NPE3-3 associates with not only ERalpha but also with splicing factors, serine/arginine-rich protein (SRp)-30c, SRp40, and splicing factor SC-35, suggesting that NPE3-3 is likely to be involved in regulation of mRNA splicing. Accordingly, transient expression of NPE3-3 in cells resulted in expected splicing of the CD44 control minigene. We also discovered that NPE3-3-overexpressing clones produced a novel, previously unrecognized, alternatively spliced variant of ERalpha (termed ERalphaV), which had a molecular size of 37 kDa composed of only exons 1, 2, 7, and 8. ERalphaV was expressed and sequestered in the cytoplasm in MCF-7 cells stably overexpressing NPE3-3, suggesting its involvement in nongenomic hormone signaling. NPE3-3 clones exhibited up-regulation of ERK1/2 signaling, cyclin D1, and cathepsin D and enhanced tumor cell proliferation, migration, and tumorigenicity. Moreover, direct expression of the ERalphaV in breast cancer cells stimulated ERK1/2 up-regulation and cyclin D1 expression. We found that ERalphaV physically interacted with MAPK kinase (MEK)-1/2, and thus, an ERalphaV and MEK1/2 complex could lead to the activation of the ERK1/2 pathway. Interestingly, NPE3-3 was up-regulated in human breast tumors. These findings revealed a role for NPE3-3 in alternative splicing and suggest that ERalpha is a physiological target of NPE3-3, leading to a constitutive nongenomic signaling pathway in breast cancer cells.

G protein-coupled receptor 30 expression is up-regulated by EGF and TGF alpha in estrogen receptor alpha-positive cancer cells

In the present study, we evaluated the regulation of G protein-coupled receptor (GPR)30 expression in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive endometrial, ovarian, and estrogen-sensitive, as well as tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. We demonstrate that epidermal growth factor (EGF) and TGF alpha transactivate the GPR30 promoter and accordingly up-regulate GPR30 mRNA and protein levels only in endometrial and tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. These effects exerted by EGF and TGF alpha were dependent on EGF receptor (EGFR) expression and activation and involved phosphorylation of the Tyr(1045) and Tyr(1173) EGFR sites. Using gene-silencing experiments and specific pharmacological inhibitors, we have ascertained that EGF and TGF alpha induce GPR30 expression through the EGFR/ERK transduction pathway, and the recruitment of c-fos to the activator protein-1 site located within GPR30 promoter sequence. Interestingly, we show that functional cross talk of GPR30 with both activated EGFR and ER alpha relies on a physical interaction among these receptors, further extending the potential of estrogen to trigger a complex stimulatory signaling network in hormone-sensitive tumors. Given that EGFR/HER2 overexpression is associated with tamoxifen resistance, our data may suggest that ligand-activated EGFR could contribute to the failure of tamoxifen therapy also by up-regulating GPR30, which in turn could facilitates the action of estrogen. In addition, important for resistance is the ability of tamoxifen to bind to and activate GPR30, the expression of which is up-regulated by EGFR activation. Our results emphasize the need for new endocrine agents able to block widespread actions of estrogen without exerting any stimulatory activity on transduction pathways shared by the steroid and growth factor-signaling networks.

Combined low doses of PPARgamma and RXR ligands trigger an intrinsic apoptotic pathway in human breast cancer cells

Ligand activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma and retinoid X receptor (RXR) induces antitumor effects in cancer. We evaluated the ability of combined treatment with nanomolar levels of the PPARgamma ligand rosiglitazone (BRL) and the RXR ligand 9-cis-retinoic acid (9RA) to promote antiproliferative effects in breast cancer cells. BRL and 9RA in combination strongly inhibit of cell viability in MCF-7, MCF-7TR1, SKBR-3, and T-47D breast cancer cells, whereas MCF-10 normal breast epithelial cells are unaffected. In MCF-7 cells, combined treatment with BRL and 9RA up-regulated mRNA and protein levels of both the tumor suppressor p53 and its effector p21(WAF1/Cip1). Functional experiments indicate that the nuclear factor-kappaB site in the p53 promoter is required for the transcriptional response to BRL plus 9RA. We observed that the intrinsic apoptotic pathway in MCF-7 cells displays an ordinated sequence of events, including disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential, release of cytochrome c, strong caspase 9 activation, and, finally, DNA fragmentation. An expression vector for p53 antisense abrogated the biological effect of both ligands, which implicates involvement of p53 in PPARgamma/RXR-dependent activity in all of the human breast malignant cell lines tested. Taken together, our results suggest that multidrug regimens including a combination of PPARgamma and RXR ligands may provide a therapeutic advantage in breast cancer treatment.

Expression of the K303R estrogen receptor-alpha breast cancer mutation induces resistance to an aromatase inhibitor via addiction to the PI3K/Akt kinase pathway

Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are rapidly becoming the first choice for hormonal treatment of estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha)-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. However, de novo and acquired resistance frequently occurs. We have previously identified a lysine to arginine transition at residue 303 (K303R) in ERalpha in premalignant breast lesions and invasive breast cancers, which confers estrogen hypersensitivity and resistance to tamoxifen treatment. Thus, we questioned whether resistance to AIs could arise in breast cancer cells expressing the ERalpha mutation. As preclinical models to directly test this possibility, we generated K303R-overexpressing MCF-7 cells stably transfected with an aromatase expression vector. Cells were stimulated with the aromatase substrate, androstenedione, with or without the AI anastrozole (Ana). We found that Ana decreased androstenedione-stimulated growth of wild-type cells, whereas K303R-expressing cells were resistant to the inhibitory effect of Ana on growth. We propose that a mechanism of resistance involves an increased binding between the mutant receptor and the p85alpha regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI3K), leading to increased PI3K activity and activation of protein kinase B/Akt survival pathways. Inhibition of the selective "addiction" to the PI3K/Akt pathway reversed AI resistance associated with expression of the mutant receptor. Our findings suggest that the K303R ERalpha mutation might be a new predictive marker of response to AIs in mutation-positive breast tumors, and that targeting the PI3K/Akt pathway may be a useful strategy for treating patients with tumors resistant to hormone therapy.

Androgen receptor overexpression induces tamoxifen resistance in human breast cancer cells

Although the androgen receptor (AR) is a known clinical target in prostate cancer, little is known about its possible role in breast cancer. We have investigated the role of AR expression in human breast cancer in response to treatment with the antiestrogen tamoxifen. Resistance to tamoxifen is a major problem in treating women with breast cancer. By gene expression profiling, we found elevated AR and reduced estrogen receptor (ER) alpha mRNA in tamoxifen-resistant tumors. Exogenous overexpression of AR rendered ERalpha-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells resistant to the growth-inhibitory effects of tamoxifen in anchorage-independent growth assays and in xenograft studies in athymic nude mice. AR-overexpressing cells remained sensitive to growth stimulation with dihydrotestosterone. Treatment with the AR antagonist Casodex (bicalutamide) reversed this resistance, demonstrating the involvement of AR signaling in tamoxifen resistance. In AR-overexpressing cells, tamoxifen induced transcriptional activation by ERalpha that could be blocked by Casodex, suggesting that AR overexpression enhances tamoxifen's agonistic properties. Our data suggest a role for AR overexpression as a novel mechanism of hormone resistance, so that AR may offer a new clinical therapeutic target in human breast cancers.