Correlation between artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram and echocardiographic features in aortic stenosis

Aims

An artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) is a promising tool to detect patients with aortic stenosis (AS) before developing symptoms. However, functional, structural, or haemodynamic components reflected in AI-ECG responsible for its detection are unknown.

Methods and results

The AI-ECG model that was developed at Mayo Clinic using a convolutional neural network to identify patients with moderate-severe AS was applied. In patients used as the testing group, the correlation between the AI-ECG probability of AS and echocardiographic parameters was investigated. This study included 102 926 patients (63.0 ± 16.3 years, 52% male), and 28 464 (27.7%) were identified as AS positive by AI-ECG. Older age, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and heart failure were more common in the positive AI-ECG group than in the negative group (P < 0.001). The AI-ECG was correlated with aortic valve area (ρ = -0.48, R² = 0.20), peak velocity (ρ = 0.22, R² = 0.08), and mean pressure gradient (ρ = 0.35, R² = 0.08). The AI-ECG also correlated with left ventricular (LV) mass index (ρ = 0.36, R² = 0.13), E/e' (ρ = 0.36, R² = 0.12), and left atrium volume index (ρ = 0.42, R² = 0.12). Neither LV ejection fraction nor stroke volume index had a significant correlation with the AI-ECG. Age correlated with the AI-ECG (ρ = 0.46, R² = 0.22) and its correlation with echocardiography parameters was similar to that of the AI-ECG.

Conclusion

A combination of AS severity, diastolic dysfunction, and LV hypertrophy is reflected in the AI-ECG to detect AS. There seems to be a gradation of the cardiac anatomical/functional features in the model and its identification process of AS is multifactorial.

Impact of aortic valve replacement in symptomatic low-risk patients with less than severe aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR or SAVR) affects clinical and haemodynamic outcomes in symptomatic patients with moderately-severe aortic stenosis (AS).

METHODS

Echocardiographic evidence of severe AS for enrolment in the Evolut Low Risk trial was based on site-reported measurements. For this post hoc analysis, core laboratory measurements identified patients with symptomatic moderately-severe AS (1.0

RESULTS

Moderately-severe AS was identified in 113 out of 1414 patients (8%). Baseline AVA was 1.1±0.1 cm2, peak velocity 3.7±0.2 m/s, MG 32.7±4.8 mm Hg and aortic valve calcium volume 588 (364, 815) mm3. Valve haemodynamics improved following TAVR (AVA 2.5±0.7 cm2, peak velocity 1.9±0.5 m/s and MG 8.4±4.8 mm Hg; p<0.001 for all) and SAVR (AVA 2.0±0.6 cm2, peak velocity 2.1±0.4 m/s and MG 10.0±3.4 mm Hg; p<0.001 for all). At 24 months, the rates of death or disabling stroke were similar (TAVR 7.7% vs SAVR 6.5%; p=0.82). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score assessing quality of life improved from baseline to 30 days after TAVR (67.0±20.6 to 89.3±13.4; p<0.001) and SAVR (67.5±19.6 to 78.3±22.3; p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In symptomatic patients with moderately-severe AS, AVR appears to be beneficial. Determination of the clinical and haemodynamic profile of patients who can benefit from earlier isolated AVR needs further investigation in randomised clinical trials.

Collapse

Key Words

• Aortic Valve Stenosis
• Heart Valve Diseases
• Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging
• Aortic Valve/surgery
• Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects
• Quality of Life
• Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging
• Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery
• Aortic Valve Stenosis/etiology
• Treatment Outcome

Collapse

Grants

• UL1 TR001863 NCATS NIH HHS
• Medtronic

Collapse

Perioperative management of aortic stenosis in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery

Aortic stenosis is one of the most common cardiac valve pathologies in the world and its prevalence increases with age. Although previously associated with increased perioperative mortality, more recent studies suggest that mortality rates may be decreasing. Recent guidelines suggest that major non-cardiac surgery can be performed safely in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis patients with close hemodynamic monitoring. Among symptomatic patients, the guidelines recommend aortic valve intervention prior to major non-cardiac surgery because of a reduction in the incidence of postoperative heart failure and improved rates of long-term overall survival. This review provides a comprehensive and contemporary review of the perioperative management of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Impact of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices on Cost and Length of Stay in Patients With Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Transcutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in aortic stenosis are associated with arrhythmic complications that can require cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation, but impact on healthcare-associated cost (HAC) and length of stay (LOS) are unknown. This study aimed to assess differences among SAVR/TAVI patients with CIED implantation on HAC and LOS. Patients hospitalized for SAVR or TAVI between 2011 and 2017 on the National Inpatient Sample database were identified and stratified according to presence/type of CIED implantation. During this period, 95,262 patients were identified; 6,435 (6.8%) patients received CIED (median [interquartile range] age: 74.0 [66.0 to 82.0] years). The median adjusted HAC was $44,271 and LOS was 6 days. CIED implantation was associated with longer LOS and higher adjusted HAC in patients with SAVR and TAVI (p <0.0001). Patients with in-hospital death and complications because of SAVR or TAVI had longer preceding in-hospital days of admission. Male patients admitted to small hospitals and the West region had the highest HAC. In conclusion, CIED implantation for arrhythmias results in higher HAC and longer LOS in patients with aortic stenosis for both SAVR and TAVI.

Cerebral and Retinal Infarction in Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Background Description of cerebral and retinal infarction in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is limited to case reports. We aimed to characterize cerebral and retinal infarction and examine outcomes in patients with BAV. Methods and Results Consecutive patients from 1975 to 2015 with BAV (n=5401) were retrospectively identified from the institutional database; those with confirmed cerebral or retinal infarction were analyzed. Infarction occurring after aortic valve replacement was not included. Patients were grouped according to infarction pathogenesis: embolism from a degenerative calcific BAV (BAVi); non-BAV, large artery atherosclerotic or lacunar infarction (LAi); and non-BAV, non-large artery embolic infarction (nLAi). There were 83/5401 (1.5%) patients, mean age 54±12 years and 28% female, with confirmed cerebral or retinal infarction (LAi 23/83 [28%]; nLAi 30/83 [36%]; BAVi 26/83 [31%]; other 4/83 [5%]). Infarction was embolic in 72/83 (87%), and 35/72 (49%) were cardioembolic. CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 1.4±1.2 in BAVi (P=0.188 versus nLAi) and 2.3±1.2 in LAi (P=0.005). Recurrent infarction occurred in 41% overall (50% BAVi, P=0.164 and 0.803 versus LAi and nLAi). BAVi was more commonly retinal (39% BAVi versus 13% LAi, P=0.044 versus 0% nLAi, P=0.002). Patients with BAVi and LAi were more likely to have moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis and undergo aortic valve replacement compared with patients with nLAi. Conclusions Cardioembolism, often from degenerative calcification of the aortic valve, is a predominant cause of cerebral and retinal infarction in patients with BAV and is frequently recurrent. Cerebral and retinal infarction should be regarded as a complication of BAV.

Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on Outcomes in Very Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

The prevalence and impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) versus sinus rhythm (SR) on outcomes in very severe aortic stenosis (vsAS) of the native valve is unknown. The aim of the study was to determine the prognostic significance of AF in vsAS. A total of 563 patients with vsAS (transaortic valve peak velocity ≥5 m/s) and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% were identified retrospectively. Patients were divided by rhythm at the time of index transthoracic echocardiogram (AF: n = 50 [9%] vs SR: n = 513 [91%]). Patients with AF were older (83.1 ± 7.5 vs 72.5 ± 12.2 y, p <0.001) and had no difference in gender distribution (p = 0.49) but had a higher Charlson co-morbidity index (2 [1,3] vs 1 [0,2], p = 0.01). There was no difference in transaortic peak velocity (5.3 ± 0.3 m/s vs 5.4 ± 0.4 m/s, p = 0.13) and left ventricular ejection fraction was comparable (63 ± 7 vs 66 ± 7%, p = 0.01). Age-, gender-, Charlson co-morbidity index-, and time-dependent aortic valve replacement (AVR)-adjusted overall mortality at 5 years was significantly higher in patients with AF than patients with SR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.88 [1.23 to 2.85], p = 0.003). AVR was associated with improved survival (HR = 0.30 [0.22 to 0.42], p <0.001), with no statistically significant interaction of AVR and rhythm (p = 0.36). Outcomes were also compared in the 2 SR:1 AF propensity-matched analyses (100 SR: 50 AF), with matching done according to age, gender, clinical co-morbidities, and year of echocardiogram. In the propensity-matched analysis, age-, gender-, and time-dependent AVR-adjusted all-cause mortality was higher in AF (HR 2.32 [1.41 to 3.82], p <0.001). In conclusion, AF was not uncommon in vsAS and identified a subset of patients at a much higher risk of mortality without AVR.

Valvular Heart Disease: New Concepts in Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Approaches

This review discusses recent advancements in the field of valvular heart disease. Topics covered include recognition of the impact of atrial fibrillation on development and assessment of valvular disease, strategies for global prevention of rheumatic heart disease, understanding and management of secondary mitral regurgitation, the updated classification of bicuspid aortic valve disease, recognition of heightened cardiovascular risk associated with moderate aortic stenosis, and a growing armamentarium of transcatheter therapies.

The 5 Phenotypes of Tricuspid Regurgitation: Insight From Cluster Analysis of Clinical and Echocardiographic Variables

BACKGROUND

The recent morphologic classification of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (ie, atrial functional, ventricular functional, lead related, and primary) does not capture underlying comorbidities and clinical characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify the different phenotypes of TR using unsupervised cluster analysis and to determine whether differences in clinical outcomes were associated with these phenotypes.

METHODS

We included 13,611 patients with ≥moderate TR from January 2004 to April 2019 in the final analyses. Baseline demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic data were obtained from electronic medical records and echocardiography reports. Ward's minimum variance method was used to cluster patients based on 38 variables. The analysis of all-cause mortality was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and groups were compared using log-rank test.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 72 ± 13 years, and 56% were women. Cluster analysis identified 5 distinct phenotypes: cluster 1 represented "low-risk TR" with less severe TR, a lower prevalence of right ventricular enlargement, atrial fibrillation, and comorbidities; cluster 2 represented "high-risk TR"; and clusters 3, 4, and 5 represented TR associated with lung disease, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease, respectively. Cluster 1 had the lowest mortality followed by clusters 2 (HR: 2.22 [95% CI: 2.1-2.35]; P < 0.0001) and 4 (HR: 2.19 [95% CI: 2.04-2.35]; P < 0.0001); cluster 3 (HR: 2.45 [95% CI: 2.27-2.65]; P < 0.0001); and, lastly, cluster 5 (HR: 3.48 [95% CI: 3.07-3.95]; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cluster analysis identified 5 distinct novel subgroups of TR with differences in all-cause mortality. This phenotype-based classification improves our understanding of the interaction of comorbidities with this complex valve lesion and can inform clinical decision making.

The Interaction of FEV1 and NT-Pro-BNP with Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

OBJECTIVES

Low forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and elevated N-terminal Pro form B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-Pro-BNP) have been individually associated with poor outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We hypothesized a combination of the two would provide prognostic indication after TAVR.

METHODS

We categorized 871 patients who received TAVR from 2008 to 2018 into 4 groups according to baseline FEV1 (< or ≥ 60% predicted) and NT-Pro-BNP (< or ≥ 1601 pg/ml): group A (n = 312, high FEV1, low NT-Pro-BNP), group B (n = 275, high FEV1, high NT-Pro-BNP), group C (n = 123 low FEV1, low NT-Pro-BNP), and group D (n = 161, low FEV1, high NT-Pro-BNP). The primary endpoint was survival at 1 and 5 years.

RESULTS

Patients in group A had more severe aortic stenosis and achieved the best long-term survival at 1- (93% (95% CI: 90-96) and 5- years (45.3% (95% CI: 35.4-58). Low FEV1 and high NT-Pro-BNP (group D) patients had more severe symptoms, higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of operative mortality, lower ejection fraction and aortic valve gradient at baseline. They had the worst survival at 1- (76% (95% CI: 69-83) and at 5-years (13.1% (95% CI: 7-25), Hazard Ratio compared to group A: 2.29 (95% CI: 1.6-3.2, p < 0.001) with 25.7% of patients in NYHA class III-IV. Patients in groups B and C had intermediate outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of FEV1 and NT-Pro-BNP stratify patients into 4 groups with distinct risk profiles and clinical outcomes. Patients with low FEV1 and high NT-Pro-BNP have increased comorbidities, poor functional outcomes, and decreased long term survival after TAVR.

Underestimation of Aortic Stenosis Severity by Doppler Mean Gradient during Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from Aortic Valve Weight

BACKGROUND

Doppler mean gradient (MG) can underestimate aortic stenosis (AS) severity when obtained during atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with sinus rhythm (SR). Aortic valve weight (AVW) is a flow-independent measure of AS severity. The objective of this study was to determine whether AVW or AVW/MG ratio was increased in AF versus SR in patients with AS.

METHODS

Excised native aortic valves from 495 consecutive patients (median age, 77 years; interquartile range [IQR], 71-82 years; 40% women), with left ventricular ejection fractions ≥50% who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement for native valve severe AS (aortic valve area ≤ 1 cm² or indexed aortic valve area ≤ 0.6 cm²/m²) were weighed. Excised AVW/MG ratios were compared in AF versus SR in patients with high-gradient AS (aortic peak velocity ≥ 4 m/sec or MG ≥ 40 mm Hg) and low-gradient AS (aortic peak velocity < 4 m/sec and MG < 40 mm Hg) in sex-specific analyses.

RESULTS

AF was present in 51 patients (10%; 11 of 51 [22%] had low-gradient AS) and SR in 444 (90%; 23 of 444 [5%] had low-gradient AS). There was no difference in sex distribution between AF and SR. Aortic valve area was not different, but forward stroke volume index and transaortic valve flow rate were lower in AF (P ≤ .002 for all); MG was lower in AF versus SR (median, 46 mm Hg [IQR, 37-50 mm Hg] vs 50 mm Hg [IQR, 44-61 mm Hg]; P < .0001). Overall AVW was not different (median, 2,290 mg [IQR, 1,830-3,063 mg] vs 2,140 mg [IQR, 1,530-2,958 mg]; P = .31), but overall AVW/MG ratio was higher in AF (median, 55 [IQR, 41-67] vs 42 [IQR, 30-55]; P = .001). In sex- and MG-specific analyses, the AVW/MG ratio was higher in AF compared with SR in men with high-gradient AS (median, 58 [IQR, 41-75] vs 51 [IQR, 39-61]; P = .03), but the differences were not statistically significant between AF and SR in other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

AVW was discordant to Doppler MG in AF compared with SR in men with high-gradient AS. Additional studies of the relationship of MG to other measures of AS severity, such as leaflet fibrosis, are needed.

Incidence and Burden of Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is considered a risk factor for isolated tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) in the absence of other known etiologies.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to identify the incidence of clinically significant isolated TR and its impact in patients with AF.

METHODS

A population-based record linkage system was used to identify adult patients with new-onset AF. Patients with evidence of moderate or greater tricuspid valve disease, left-sided valve disease, pulmonary hypertension, prior cardiac surgery, impaired left ventricular systolic/diastolic function at baseline were excluded. The remaining patients (n = 691) were followed over time to identify development of moderate or greater TR and assess its impact on subsequent survival.

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients (33.6%) developed moderate or greater TR. Among these, 73 patients (10.6%) had isolated TR without significant underlying structural heart disease. Incidence rate of any moderate or greater TR was 3.9 cases and that of isolated TR was 1.3 cases per 100 person-years. Permanent/persistent AF and female sex were associated with increased risk of developing TR, whereas rhythm control was associated with lower risk of TR. Over a median clinical follow-up of 13.3 years (IQR: 10.0-15.9 years), development of any moderate or greater TR (HR: 2.92; 95% CI: 2.29-3.73; P < 0.001) and isolated significant TR (HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.03-2.22; P = 0.03) were associated with an adjusted increased risk of subsequent mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based cohort of patients with AF, nearly one-third developed moderate or greater TR over time. Incident significant TR and incident isolated significant TR portend a worse survival in patients with AF.

Characterization of myocardial mechanics and its prognostic significance in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement

AIMS

Aortic stenosis (AS) induces characteristic changes in left ventricular (LV) mechanics that can be reversed after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We aimed to comprehensively characterize LV mechanics before and after AVR in patients with severe AS and identify predictors of short-term functional recovery and long-term survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively performed comprehensive strain analysis by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography in 88 patients with severe AS and LV ejection fraction ≥50% (mean age 71 ± 12 years, 42% female) prior to and within 7 days after AVR. Patients were followed for up to 5.2 years until death from any cause or last encounter. Within days after AVR, we observed an absolute increase in global longitudinal strain (GLS) (-16.0 ± 2.0% vs. -18.5 ± 2.1%, P<0.0001) and a decrease in apical rotation (10.5 ± 4.0° vs. 8.3 ± 2.8°, P = 0.0002) and peak systolic twist (18.2 ± 5.0° vs. 15.5 ± 3.8°, P = 0.0008). A baseline GLS is less negative than -16.2% was 90% sensitive and 67% specific in predicting a ≥ 20% relative increase in GLS. During a median follow-up of 3.8 years, a global circumferential systolic strain rate (GCSRs) less negative than -1.9% independently predicted lower survival.

CONCLUSION

In patients with severe AS, a reversal in GLS, apical rotation, and peak systolic twist abnormalities towards normal occurs within days of AVR. Baseline GLS is the strongest predictor of GLS recovery but neither was associated with long-term survival. In contrast, abnormal baseline GCSRs are associated with worse outcomes.

Prognostic value of left ventricular chamber stiffness and heart failure in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement

Background

Increased left ventricular (LV) stiffness (LVStiffn) was shown to be associated with mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), despite aortic valve replacement (AVR), and may contribute to future heart failure (HF) symptoms. The aim was to assess whether preoperative LVStiffn is a risk factor of HF in these patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was done in patients with severe AS who underwent AVR (93% surgical). LV end-diastolic pressure-volume relations (P=aVb) were reconstructed from LV end-diastolic volumes and estimated end-diastolic pressures (from E/e'); LVStiffn at 30 mmHg (CS30) and capacitance (V30) were then derived. Primary endpoint was development of symptomatic HF at &gt;1 month post AVR.

Results

1,837 patients were studied (age 76±10 years, 62% males, LVEF 61±12%; Table). Mean CS30 was 2.2±1.3 mmHg/mL and V30 64±17 mL/m2. Patients with higher CS30 ≥3 mmHg/mL were older, more frequently female, and had more comorbidities. During a median follow-up of 5.0 [3.0–7.9] years, 607 (33%) patients developed HF. A higher CS30 (≥3 mmHg/mL), but not V30 (P=0.32), was associated with higher risk of HF events (HR 1.86 [95% CI 1.52–2.27], P&lt;0.0001), along with other clinical and echo predictors (Table). In multivariate analysis, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, advanced NYHA class III–IV, creatinine &gt;1.5 mg/dL, medication use, severity of AS, reduced LVEF &lt;50%, diastolic dysfunction grade ≥2, right ventricular size and pulmonary hypertension, a higher CS30 ≥3 mmHg/mL remained independently associated with HF events (adjusted HR 1.61 [1.29–2.01], P&lt;0.0001; Figure).

Conclusion

Increased LVStiffn in patients with severe AS undergoing AVR is associated with HF at follow-up, despite the benefits brought by AVR, and can help identify patients with poorer outcomes who may need closer monitoring/more intensive treatment of comorbidities

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Impact of atrial fibrillation in clinical outcomes of low gradient aortic stenosis

Introduction

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common significant valvular heart disease in developed countries. A significant portion of the AS populations have low-gradient AS (LGAS), defined as aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2 and a trans-aortic mean systolic gradient and peak velocity &lt;40 mmHg and &lt;4 m/s, respectively. LGAS has been shown previously to have worse mortality compared to high-gradient AS (HGAS). Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with LGAS and AF has been associated with worse outcomes compared to sinus rhythm (SR) in HGAS. The prognostic impact of AF in LGAS is not well described in previous literature.

Hypothesis

AF will be associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to SR in patients with LGAS.

Methods

3400 patients diagnosed with LGAS from 2010–2020 were retrospectively identified and analyzed. Their electrical rhythm was analyzed at the time of their echocardiographic diagnosis of LGAS and patients were split into 3 separate groups: SR (n=2036), SR with history of AF (n=519), and AF (n=845). After adjustment for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), primary endpoints of overall mortality and cardiac mortality were assessed for patients.

Results

Compared to those with SR, patients with AF and history of AF had significantly higher overall mortality (HR 1.52, p&lt;0.0001 and HR 1.22, p=0.004, respectively) and cardiac mortality (HR 2.05, p&lt;0.0001 and HR 1.37, p=0.03, respectfully) (Figure 1). On further sub group analysis, AF seemed to be most importantly associated with mortality and cardiac mortality in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF &gt;50%, normal flow LGAS) compared to those patients with reduced EF (classical low-flow LGAS), where there was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between AF and SR (Figure 2).

Conclusions

Atrial fibrillation, compared to sinus rhythm, is associated with worse overall mortality and cardiac mortality in patients with LGAS and preserved EF. Specifically, this association was strongest in patients with preserved EF &gt;50%. Given these findings, the presence of AF should be factored into clinical decision making regarding LGAS management given the higher risk of age, sex, and CCI adjusted overall and cardiac mortality. Further research needs to be done to see if earlier aortic valve intervention in these patients would improve mortality compared to their SR counterparts.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

The use of warfarin as part of antithrombotic strategy after transcutaneous aortic valve replacement is not associated with better medium-term outcomes

Background

Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is currently a well-recognized cause of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. It was found to be associated with accelerated degeneration of the bioprosthesis with higher rates of valve re-replacement, even after treatment with anticoagulation. We hypothesized that the use of warfarin for three months after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) protects against accelerated valve degeneration and is therefore associated with better outcomes compared to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).

Methods

Consecutive adult patients who underwent TAVR in our clinic between 2012 and 2019 were identified retrospectively. Patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded. Subsequently, patients who received DAPT were propensity matched to up to 2 patients who received three months of warfarin as part of their anti-thrombotic regimen. Matching was performed for variables that were significantly different at baseline between the two groups and included diabetes mellitus, prior myocardial infarctions, chronic lung disease, peripheral arterial disease, hemoglobin at time of TAVR, kidney function [creatinine&gt;2], use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors / angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta blockers, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score [STS ≥8, STS 4–8, STS&lt;4], and valve size. The two groups were then compared for outcomes of ischemic stroke, death, valve re-replacement/intervention, the composite endpoint of the aforementioned three outcomes, as well as the three-month outcome of hemorrhagic strokes. Kaplan Meier was used for outcome analysis, and discharge date was considered time zero. Patients who had their anti-thrombotic therapy interrupted were censored at that time point.

Results

A total of 1,373 patients who underwent TAVR were identified. Of these, 576 patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded. Baseline characteristics were compared between 633 patients who received three months of warfarin and 164 patients who received DAPT after TAVR. After matching the two groups, 435 patients were included in the final analysis [warfarin in 281, DAPT in 154; median time to last follow up 2.61 years], Table 1. There was no difference in matched (Figure 1) or unmatched analysis (not shown) in outcomes of ischemic stroke, death, valve re-replacement/intervention, their composite endpoint, or hemorrhagic strokes (p&gt;0.05 for all).

Conclusion

Antithrombotic regimen including three months of warfarin after TAVR was not associated with better outcomes of ischemic strokes, deaths, and valve re-replacement/intervention or with increased risk of hemorrhagic strokes compared to DAPT.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Cardiovascular Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients With ADPKD

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease leads to high morbidity and mortality in patients with kidney failure. Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) is a systemic disease with various cardiac abnormalities. Details on the cardiovascular profile of patients with ADPKD who are undergoing kidney transplantation (KT) and its progression are limited.

Methods

Echocardiographic data within 2 years before KT (1993-2020), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after transplantation were retrieved. The primary outcome is to assess cardiovascular abnormalities on echocardiography at the time of transplantation in ADPKD as compared with patients without ADPKD matched by sex (male, 59.4%) and age at transplantation (57.2 ± 8.8 years).

Results

Compared with diabetic nephropathy (DN, n = 271) and nondiabetic, patients without ADPKD (NDNA) (n = 271) at the time of KT, patients with ADPKD (n = 271) had lower rates of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (39.4% vs. 66.4% vs. 48.6%), mitral (2.7% vs. 6.3% vs. 7.45) and tricuspid regurgitations (1.8% vs. 6.6% vs. 7.2%). Patients with ADPKD had less diastolic (25.3%) and systolic (5.6%) dysfunction at time of transplantation. Patients with ADPKD had the most favorable post-transplantation survival (median 18.7 years vs. 12.0 for diabetic nephropathy [DN] and 13.8 years for nondiabetic non-ADPKD [NDNA]; P < 0.01) and the most favorable MACE-free survival rate (hazard ratio = 0.51, P < 0.001). Patients with ADPKD had worsening of their valvular function and an increase in the sinus of Valsalva diameter post-transplantation (38.2 vs. 39.9 mm, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

ADPKD transplant recipients have the most favorable cardiac profile pretransplantation with better patient survival and MACE-free survival rates but worsening valvular function and increasing sinus of Valsalva diameter, as compared with patients with other kidney diseases.

Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes (TRIO): A Simple Clinical Risk Score

OBJECTIVE

To determine which clinical variables infer the highest risk for mortality in patients with notable tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and to develop a clinical assessment tool (the Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes [TRIO] score).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort of 13,608 patients with undifferentiated moderate to severe TR at the time of index echocardiography between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016, was included. Baseline demographic and clinical data were obtained. Patients were randomly assigned to a training (N=10,205) and a validation (N=3403) cohort. Median follow-up was 6.5 years (interquartile range, 0.8 to 11.0 years). Variables associated with mortality were identified by Cox proportional hazards methods. A geographically distinct cohort of 7138 patients was used for further validation. The primary end point was all-cause mortality over 10 years.

RESULTS

The 5-year probability of death was 53% for moderate TR, 63% for moderate-severe TR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17 to 1.31]; P<.001 vs moderate), and 71% for severe TR (HR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.47 to 1.64]; P<.001 vs moderate). Factors associated with all-cause mortality on multivariate analysis included age 70 years or older, male sex, creatinine level greater than 2 mg/dL, congestive heart failure, chronic lung disease, aspartate aminotransferase level of 40 U/L or greater, heart rate of 90 beats/min or greater, and severe TR. Variables were assigned 1 or 2 points (HR, >1.5) and added to compute the TRIO score. The score was associated with all-cause mortality (C statistic = 0.67) and was able to separate patients into risk categories. Findings were similar in the second, independent and geographically distinct cohort.

CONCLUSION

The TRIO score is a simple clinical tool for risk assessment in patients with notable TR. Future prospective studies to validate its use are warranted.

Prevalence and Natural History of Mitral Annulus Calcification and Related Valve Dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence and natural history of mitral annulus calcification (MAC) and associated mitral valve dysfunction (MVD) in patients undergoing clinically indicated echocardiography.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all adults who underwent echocardiography in 2015. Mitral valve dysfunction was defined as mitral regurgitation or mitral stenosis (MS) of moderate or greater severity. All-cause mortality during 3.0 (0.4 to 4.2) years of follow-up was compared between groups stratified according to the presence of MAC or MVD.

RESULTS

Of 24,414 evaluated patients, 5502 (23%) had MAC. Patients with MAC were older (75±10 years vs 60±16 years; P<.001) and more frequently had MVD (MS: 6.6% vs 0.5% [P<.001]; mitral regurgitation without MS: 9.5% vs 6.1% [P<.001]). Associated with MS in patients with MAC were aortic valve dysfunction, female sex, chest irradiation, renal dysfunction, and coronary artery disease. Kaplan-Meier 1-year survival was 76% in MAC+/MVD+, 87% in MAC+/MVD-, 86% in MAC-/MVD+, and 92% in MAC-/MVD-. Adjusted for age, diabetes, renal dysfunction, cancer, chest irradiation, ejection fraction below 50%, aortic stenosis, tricuspid regurgitation, and pulmonary hypertension, MAC was associated with higher mortality during follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.49; P<.001); MVD was associated with even higher mortality in patients with MAC (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.01; P<.001). There was no significant interaction between MAC and MVD for mortality (P=.10).

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort of adults undergoing echocardiography, the prevalence of MAC was 23%. Mitral valve dysfunction was more than twice as prevalent in patients with MAC. Adjusted mortality was increased in patients with MAC and worse with both MAC and MVD.

Atrial mitral regurgitation: Characteristics and outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair

BACKGROUND

Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (MTEER) is an established therapeutic approach for mitral regurgitation (MR). Functional mitral regurgitation originating from atrial myopathy (A-FMR) has been described.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic considerations in A-FMR patients undergoing MTEER.

METHODS

From 2014 to 2020, patients undergoing MTEER for degenerative MR (DMR), functional MR (FMR), and mixed MR were assessed. A-FMR was defined by the presence of MR > moderate in severity; left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50%; and severe left atrial (LA) enlargement in the absence of LV dysfunction, leaflet pathology, or LV tethering. The diagnosis of A-FMR (vs. ventricular-FMR [V-FMR]) was confirmed by three independent echocardiographers. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes as well as clinical and echocardiographic follow-up are reported. Device success was defined as final MR grade ≤ moderate; MR reduction ≥1 grade; and final transmitral gradient <5 mmHg.

RESULTS

306 patients underwent MTEER, including DMR (62%), FMR (19%), and mixed MR (19%). FMR cases included 37 (63.8%) V-FMR and 21 (36.2%) A-FMR. Tricuspid regurgitation (≥ moderate) was higher in A-FMR (80.1%) compared to V-FMR (54%) and DMR (42%). Device success did not significantly differ between A-FMR and V-FMR (57% vs. 73%, p = 0.34) or DMR (57% vs. 64%, p = 1.0). The A-FMR cohort was less likely to achieve ≥3 grades of MR reduction compared to V-FMR (19% vs. 54%, p = 0.01) and DMR (19% vs. 49.7%, p = 0.01). Patients with V-FMR and DMR demonstrated significant reductions in mean left atrial pressure (LAP) and peak LA V-wave, though A-FMR did not (LAP -0.24 ± 4.9, p = 0.83; peak V-wave -1.76 ± 9.1, p = 0.39). In follow-up, echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing MTEER, A-FMR represents one-third of FMR cases. A-FMR demonstrates similar procedural success but blunted acute hemodynamic responses compared with DMR and V-FMR following MTEER. Dedicated studies specifically considering A-FMR are needed to discern the optimal therapeutic approaches.

Contemporary demographics, diagnostics and outcomes in non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis

OBJECTIVE

Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) is a syndrome characterised by cardiac valve vegetations and/or thickening due to non-infective mechanisms. Nowadays, a premortem diagnosis of NBTE is possible based on echocardiographic findings. Therefore, to better characterise this disease, we performed a contemporary review of the epidemiology, demographics, diagnosis and clinical outcomes of these patients.

METHODS

Adults with a diagnosis of NBTE seen within the Mayo Clinic Enterprise from December 2014 to December 2021 were included. NBTE diagnosis was identified by clinicians representing at least two specialties including cardiology, infectious diseases, rheumatology and oncology. Patients with positive blood cultures, infective endocarditis, culture-negative endocarditis and denial of research authorisation were excluded. All patients had a 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-eight cases were identified; mean age was 60.0±13.8 years, 75% were female. The most prevalent comorbidities were malignancy (52.1%) and connective tissue disease (37.5%). Valvular abnormalities included 41 (85.4%) patients with vegetations, 43 (89.6%) patients with thickening and 26 (54.2%) with moderate to severe regurgitation. Thirty-eight (79.2%) patients had an embolic event (stroke in 26 (54.2%) patients) within 1 month of NBTE diagnosis and 16 (33.3%) patients died within 1 year of NBTE diagnosis. Metastatic tumours and lung cancer were associated with 1-year all-cause mortality (p=0.0017 and p=0.0004, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

NBTE was more prevalent in females and embolic complications were the most frequent clinical finding. Overall, patients with NBTE had a poor prognosis, particularly in those with lung cancer or metastatic tumours. Further studies in patients with NBTE are needed given its morbidity and mortality.