Impact of psoriasis flare and remission on quality of life and work productivity: a real-world study in the USA

Although psoriasis patients often report a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity, less is known about how disease burden varies between periods of flare and remission. The aim of this study was tocompare HRQoL and work productivity by disease activity level. Data were extracted from Adelphi 2011/2013 Disease Specific Programmes, two real world surveys of US dermatologists and psoriasis patients. HRQoL was measured using the EuroQOL 5-Dimension Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Work productivity was measured using the Work Productivity Activity index (WPAI). Three levels of disease activity were constructed based on physician reports: remission, active not flaring, active, and flaring. Multivariable regression analyses explored the relationship between disease activity, HRQoL and work productivity, controlling for differences in demographics and comorbidities. Out of 681 psoriasis patients 24% were in remission, 62% had active disease without flaring, and 15% experienced active disease and were currently flaring. Greater disease activity was associated with worse HRQoL. EQ-5D scores decreased with more active disease (remission vs. active not flaring vs. active and flaring: 0.93 vs. 0.90 vs. 0.82; p<0.05), while DLQI scores increased (remission vs. active not flaring vs. active and flaring: 2.0 vs. 5.00 vs. 8.7; p<0.05). WPAI scores increased with disease activity indicating increased productivity loss (remission vs. active not flaring vs. active and flaring: 5.9 vs. 14.8 vs. 26.9; p<0.05). The same trends were confirmed by multivariable regression analyses.

Development of a novel treatment planning test for credentialing rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques in the UK

OBJECTIVE

The increasing use of tomotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in UK centres will result in more centres choosing to use this technology in a clinical trial setting. The Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) group has developed a new procedure to integrate into the UK intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) credentialing programme to cover rotational IMRT delivery techniques.

METHODS

A planning test [three-dimensional treatment planning system (3DTPS)] was designed specifically for rotational IMRT techniques. The feasibility of using this test in the credentialing programme for rotational IMRT was validated by 10 experienced UK centres. The study included five centres using Varian RapidArc™ (RA) (Varian Medical Systems, Milpitas, CA), two using Elekta VMAT™ (VMAT) (Elekta Inc., Norcross, GA) and three using helical tomotherapy (HT) plans. Centres were asked to carry out their own in-house quality assurance (QA) for the plans submitted for this study. A survey was sent out to centres aiming to gather information on their experience in undertaking the exercise and their QA results.

RESULTS

All centres fulfilled the primary goal by achieving the dose constraints of the primary planning target volume and organ at risk. Seven centres (three RA, one VMAT and three HT plans) were able to fulfil the secondary goal. Among those seven centres, three centres (two RA and one VMAT plans) achieved the tertiary goal. The results of the survey indicated that the 3DTPS test is a clinically relevant and practical planning test to be used.

CONCLUSION

A planning test for rotational therapy techniques was developed for the RTTQA IMRT credentialing programme.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study validated the feasibility of a 3DTPS test to be used as part of a credentialing programme for rotational IMRT techniques in the UK.

Does participation in clinical trials influence the implementation of new techniques? A look at changing techniques in breast radiotherapy in the UK

AIMS

To examine the effect of UK breast radiotherapy trials on the adoption of new radiotherapy techniques over the last 15 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data were taken from questionnaires returned to the national radiotherapy quality assurance team for each of the major trials (START, Supremo, FAST, IMPORT) with additional information sought from heads of radiotherapy physics departments where needed.

RESULTS

The peak years for the introduction of three-dimensional radiotherapy corresponded to the opening of new trials requiring these techniques. Some non-trial centres had still not implemented three-dimensional techniques for breast cancer patients at the time the most recent questionnaire was completed (2009).

CONCLUSION

Clinical trials provide the framework and impetus for introducing more accurate radiotherapy for UK women with early breast cancer.

Quality assurance analysis of participating centres' protocol compliance to a UK multicentre hypofractionated breast (FAST) trial

OBJECTIVES

The FAST (FASTer radiotherapy for breast radiotherapy) trial is a UK Phase 2 multicentre randomised clinical trial evaluating a five-fraction schedule of whole-breast radiotherapy following local excision of early breast cancer. The purpose of this quality assurance study was to analyse the radiotherapy planning data in order to confirm compliance with the trial protocol.

METHODS

915 patients were recruited between 2004 and 2007 from 18 centres. The protocol required that all centres should use three-dimensional dose compensations to optimise radiotherapy plans. Planning techniques, maximum dose (D(max)) and dose-volume histograms from treatment plans were evaluated and compared between centres. The homogeneity of plans was tested by creating a cut-off value of 5% for the percentage of breast volume receiving >105% of the prescribed dose.

RESULTS

672 data sets from 15 centres were available. 93% (624/672) of plans were treated using forward-planned multileaf collimator (MLC) segments, 6% with breast compensators and 1% with inverse-planned MLC segments. 94% (635/672) of patients had a D(max)≤107% of the prescribed dose. 11% (74/672) of plans delivered >105% of the prescribed dose to >5% of the breast volume.

CONCLUSION

Reviewing the data in this study, 95% of plans submitted by centres complied with the protocol. With the improved breast radiotherapy standards shown in FAST centres, the following recommendations were suggested for future UK breast radiotherapy trials: (i) the minimum, mean and maximum dose to the whole-breast planning target volume (PTV) should be recorded and assessed; (ii) apart from having a D(max)≤107% of the prescribed dose, ≤5% of PTV should a receive dose >105% of the prescription dose.