Reflux esophagitis after esophagectomy: impact of duodenogastroesophageal reflux

Reflux esophagitis (RE) is a known complication disturbing patients' quality of life after esophageal resection. It is generally recognized that bile reflux as well as acid reflux cause RE. However, the clinical influence of acid and bile reflux, and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection on RE in the cervical esophagus after esophagectomy is not yet clarified. Sixty patients who underwent cervical esophagogastrostomy following esophagectomy were enrolled in this study. They underwent examination for H. pylori infection, endoscopic examination, and continuous 24-hour pH and bilirubin monitoring, at 1 month after surgery. The influence of acid and/or bile reflux, H. pylori infection, and others on the development of RE were investigated. RE was observed in 19 patients (32%) at 1 month after esophagogastrostomy, mild RE in 16 (27%), and severe RE in 3 (5%). The percentage of time duration of both acid and bile reflux into the cervical esophagus was higher in patients with RE than in those without (P = 0.027, P < 0.001). A significant difference in %time pH < 4 acid reflux was found between mild RE and severe RE (P = 0.014), and a statistical difference in %time abs. > 0.14 between non-RE and mild RE (P = 0.017). Acid and/or bile reflux was observed in 31 patients (52%), acid-only reflux in 6 (10%), bile-only reflux in 15 (25%), and acid-and-bile reflux in 10 (17%). Severe RE was observed only in patients having acid-and-bile reflux. On the univariate analysis, no infection of H. pylori, acid reflux, and bile reflux were determined to be the influencing factors to RE among the clinical factors including age, gender, route of esophageal reconstruction, H. pylori infection, and acid-and-bile reflux. In the subanalysis using the logistic model, there were significant correlations between bile reflux and RE irrespective of the presence of H. pylori infection (P = 0.016, P = 0.007). On the other hand, there was a significant correlation between acid reflux and RE only in patients without H. pylori infection (P = 0.039). In the early period after esophagogastrostomy, bile reflux could cause RE irrespective of H. pylori infection, while acid reflex could cause RE only in patients without H. pylori infection. There is a possibility that bile reflux plays an important role in the development of RE after esophagectomy.

Detection of antibodies against the non-calcium-dependent epitopes of desmoglein 3 in pemphigus vulgaris and their pathogenic significance

BACKGROUND

Antidesmoglein (anti-Dsg) 3 serum antibody titres are usually correlated with the disease activity of pemphigus vulgaris (PV), but some patients retain high titres even in remission.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to determine whether anti-Dsg3 antibodies in PV sera recognized calcium (Ca(2+) )-dependent or non-Ca(2+) -dependent epitopes, and to evaluate their pathogenicity.

METHODS

Dsg3 baculoprotein-coated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plates were treated with 0.5 mmol L(-1) ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The binding ability of anti-Dsg3 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was analysed. Eight of the 83 patients with PV who were screened had elevated Dsg3 ELISA index values > 00 in remission. The binding ability of these PV sera was analysed. We evaluated the pathogenicity of anti-Dsg3 serum antibodies against the non-Ca(2+) -dependent epitopes using a dissociation assay.

RESULTS

The reactivity of pathogenic anti-Dsg3 mAbs against the Ca(2+) -dependent epitopes diminished markedly in the EDTA-treated ELISA, whereas no such reduction was observed in mAbs against the non-Ca(2+) -dependent epitopes. The sera of all the patients contained antibodies against both Ca(2+) -dependent and non-Ca(2+) -dependent epitopes. In six out of the eight patients, the ratio of antibodies against Ca(2+) -dependent to non-Ca(2+) -dependent epitopes decreased in remission. EDTA-treated Dsg3 baculoproteins adsorbed anti-Dsg3 serum antibodies against the non-Ca(2+) -dependent epitopes, but the remnant PV antibodies retained the ability to induce acantholysis in the dissociation assay.

CONCLUSIONS

We have established an assay to measure indirectly the titres of anti-Dsg3 serum antibodies against the Ca(2+) -dependent epitopes, based on the differences between EDTA-untreated and EDTA-treated ELISA index values, as a routine laboratory test to reflect the pathogenic anti-Dsg3 serum antibody titres more accurately.

What influences the acidity in the gastric conduit in patients who underwent cervical esophagogastrostomy for cancer?

The aim of this study was to determine the factors influencing acidity in the gastric conduit after esophagectomy for cancer. Acidity and bile reflux in the stomach and in the gastric conduit were examined by 24-h pH monitoring and bilimetry in 40 patients who underwent transthoracic subtotal esophagectomy followed by esophageal reconstruction using a gastric conduit, which was pulled up to the neck through a posterior mediastinal route in 17 patients, through a retrosternal route in 10 patients, and through a subcutaneous route in 13 patients. They were examined at 1 week before surgery, at 1 month after surgery, and at 1 year after surgery. Helicobacter pylori infection was examined pathologically and using the (13) C-urea breath test. The factors influencing acidity of the gastric conduit were analyzed using the stepwise regression model. Gastric acidity assessed by percentage (%) time of pH < 4 was reduced after surgery and was significantly less in patients with H. pylori infection compared with those without H. pylori infection throughout the period from 1 week before surgery to 1 year after surgery. Duodenogastric reflux (DGR) assessed by % time absorbance > 0.14 into the lower portion of the gastric conduit was significantly increased after surgery throughout the period from 1 month after surgery to 1 year after surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that the acidity in the gastric conduit was influenced by H. pylori infection and DGR at 1 month after surgery, and by H. pylori infection and the route for esophageal reconstruction at 1 year after surgery. Acidity in the gastric conduit was significantly decreased after surgery. Acidity in the gastric conduit for esophageal substitutes is influenced by H. pylori infection and surgery. DGR influences the gastric acidity in the short-term after surgery, but not in the long-term after surgery.

Helicobacter pylori infection influences the acidity in the gastric tube as an esophageal substitute after esophagectomy

It is commonly considered that acidity in a gastric tube used as an esophageal substitute after esophagectomy decreases due to truncal vagotomy. However, there have been few, if any, studies on the factors influencing the acidity in the gastric tube. It is well known that Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) plays an important role in acid secretion of the stomach. The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not H. pylori infection also influenced the acidity in the gastric tube as an esophageal substitute. We investigated the changes in the levels of gastric acidity and the status of H. pylori infection from the preoperative period to 1 year after surgery. In 65 Japanese patients who underwent resection of esophageal cancer followed by reconstruction using a gastric tube, 24-h gastric pH monitoring and examination of H. pylori infection using the 13C-urea breath test and biopsy specimen obtained from the gastric mucosa under upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were performed pre- and postoperatively. Twenty-seven among the 65 patients underwent the same examinations at 1 year after surgery. The levels of postoperative gastric acidity and at 1 year after surgery were significantly lower than that of preoperative gastric acidity (P = 0.031, P = 0.001, respectively). There was no difference in the levels of gastric acidity between 1.5 months and 1 year after surgery (P = 0.282). The levels of gastric acidity in the stomach and in the gastric tube were significantly influenced by H. pylori infection, while age, gender, and past history of peptic ulcer showed no influence. The level of gastric acidity in patients who had H. pylori infection pre- and postoperatively were significantly lower than that in patients who had no H. pylori infection pre- and postoperatively (P < 0.0001). H. pylori infection was indicated to be an important factor influencing the levels of gastric acidity in the reconstructed esophagus as well as in the stomach before surgery.

Are desmoglein autoantibodies essential for the immunopathogenesis of pemphigus vulgaris, or just ‘witnesses of disease'?

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is fascinating to dermatologists, epithelial biologists and immunologists alike, as its pathogenesis has been clarified to a much greater extent than that of most other organ-specific autoimmune diseases, and as it has provided abundant novel insights into desmoglein biology and pathology along the way. Historically, the most influential PV pathogenesis concept is that of Stanley and Amagai. This concept holds that autoantibodies against desmogleins are both essential and sufficient for epidermal blister formation (acantholysis) by impeding the normal functioning of these major adhesion proteins. However, as with most good theories, this landmark concept has left a number of intriguing and important questions open (or at least has not managed to answer these to everyone's satisfaction). Moreover, selected dissenting voices in the literature have increasingly called attention to what may or may not be construed as inconsistencies in this dominant PV pathogenesis paradigm of the recent past. The present debate feature therefore bravely rises to the challenge of re-examining the entire currently available evidence, as rationally and as undogmatically as possible, by provocatively asking a carefully selected congregation of experts (who have never before jointly published on this controversial topic!) to discuss how essential anti-desmoglein autoantibodies really are in the immunopathogenesis of PV. Not surprisingly, some of our expert "witnesses" in this animated debate propose diametrically opposed answers to this question. While doing so, incisive additional questions are raised that relate to the central one posed, and our attention is called to facts that may deserve more careful consideration than they have received so far. Together with the intriguing (often still very speculative) complementary or alternative pathogenesis scenarios proposed in the following pages, this offers welcome "food for thought" as well as very specific suggestions for important future research directions--within and beyond the camp of PV aficionados. The editors trust that this attempt at a rational public debate of the full evidence that is currently at hand will constructively contribute to further dissecting the exciting--and clinically very relevant!--immunopathogenesis of PV in all its complexity.