26
|
Chin J, Hatiboglu G, Nair S, Relle J, Hafron J, Roethke M, Mueller-Wolf M, Bonekamp D, Kassam Z, Staruch R, Burtnyk M, Schlemmer H, Pahernik S. Five-year outcomes from a prospective phase I study of MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation in men with localized prostate cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33482-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
27
|
Allegretti JR, Kassam Z, Mullish BH, Chiang A, Carrellas M, Hurtado J, Marchesi JR, McDonald JAK, Pechlivanis A, Barker GF, Miguéns Blanco J, Garcia-Perez I, Wong WF, Gerardin Y, Silverstein M, Kennedy K, Thompson C. Effects of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation With Oral Capsules in Obese Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:855-863.e2. [PMID: 31301451 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Revised: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Studies in mice have shown that the intestinal microbiota can contribute to obesity via the anorexigenic gut hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) and bile acids, which affect lipid metabolism. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study of the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in obese, metabolically uncompromised patients. METHODS We performed a double-blind study of 22 obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥5 kg/m2) without a diagnosis of diabetes, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, or metabolic syndrome. Participants were assigned randomly (1:1) to groups that received FMT by capsules (induction dose of 30 capsules at week 4 and maintenance dose of 12 capsules at week 8) or placebo capsules. FMT capsules were derived from a single lean donor (BMI, 17.5 kg/m2). Patients were followed up through week 26; the primary outcome was safety. Stool and serum samples were collected from patients at baseline and at weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 after administration of the first dose of FMT or placebo and analyzed by 16S RNA gene sequencing. Stool and serum samples were analyzed for metabolomics by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Additional outcomes were the change in area under the curve for GLP1 at week 12. RESULTS We observed no significant differences in adverse events between patients who received FMT vs placebo. There was no increase in the area under the curve of GLP1 in either group. Patients who received FMT had sustained shifts in microbiomes associated with obesity toward those of the donor (P < .001). Patients who received FMT had a sustained decrease in stool levels of taurocholic acid (P < .05) compared with baseline; bile acid profiles began to resemble those of the donor more closely. We did not observe significant changes in mean BMI at week 12 in either group. CONCLUSIONS In a placebo-controlled pilot study, we found that FMT capsules (derived from a lean donor) were safe but did not reduce BMI in obese metabolically uncompromised patients. The FMT capsules were well tolerated and led to sustained changes in the intestinal microbiome and bile acid profiles that were similar to those of the lean donor. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02741518.
Collapse
|
28
|
Selvig D, Piceno Y, Terdiman J, Zydek M, Umetsu SE, Balitzer D, Fadrosh D, Lynch K, Lamere B, Leith T, Kassam Z, Beck K, Lewin S, Ma A, Somsouk M, Lynch SV, El-Nachef N. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Pouchitis: Clinical, Endoscopic, Histologic, and Microbiota Results from a Pilot Study. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65:1099-1106. [PMID: 31302808 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05715-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS This pilot study assessed the efficacy, safety, and microbiome dynamics of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for patients with chronic pouchitis. METHODS A prospective open-label pilot study was performed at an academic center among pouchitis patients undergoing FMT. Patients received a minimum of a single FMT by pouchoscopy from healthy, screened donors. The primary outcome was clinical improvement in pouchitis assessed by patient survey at week 4. Secondary outcomes included decrease in total Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) Score ≥ 3 at week 4, bowel movement frequency, ESR, CRP, fecal calprotectin, abdominal pain, and PDAI subscores including endoscopic and histologic changes. Stool samples were collected at baseline and 4 weeks post-FMT to assess bacterial microbiota using V4 16S rRNA sequencing. RESULTS Nineteen patients were enrolled; however, 1 patient was lost to follow-up. No patients had a major adverse event or escalation of therapy related to FMT. Total PDAI scores, endoscopic scores, and histologic scores did not decrease significantly post-FMT. However, there was a statistically significant improvement in bowel movement (BM) frequency (9.25-7.25 BM/day, p = 0.03) and trend for improvement in abdominal pain to improve post-FMT (p = 0.05). Bacterial microbiota profiling revealed no distinct community-level changes post-FMT, though a small number of specific bacterial taxa significantly differed in relative abundance. CONCLUSIONS A single FMT has a tolerable short-term safety profile and may be associated with a decrease in bowel movements in patients with chronic pouchitis; however, no robust endoscopic or histologic changes were observed.
Collapse
|
29
|
Ianiro G, Mullish BH, Kelly CR, Sokol H, Kassam Z, Ng SC, Fischer M, Allegretti JR, Masucci L, Zhang F, Keller J, Sanguinetti M, Costello SP, Tilg H, Gasbarrini A, Cammarota G. Screening of faecal microbiota transplant donors during the COVID-19 outbreak: suggestions for urgent updates from an international expert panel. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5:430-432. [PMID: 32192627 PMCID: PMC7104244 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30082-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
30
|
Alderwish E, Schultz E, Kassam Z, Poon M, Coplan N. Evaluation of acute chest pain: Evolving paradigm of coronary risk scores and imaging. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2019; 20:231-244. [PMID: 31912714 DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm.2019.04.589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a broad differential diagnosis for patients presenting with acute chest pain. History, physical examination, electrocardiogram, and serial troponin assays are pivotal in assessing patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. However, if the initial workup is equivocal, physicians are faced with a challenge to find the optimal strategy for further triage. Risk stratification scores have been validated for patients with known acute coronary syndrome, such as the TIMI and GRACE scores, but there may be limitations in undifferentiated chest pain patients. Advancements in imaging modalities such as coronary computed tomography angiography and the addition CT derived fractional flow reserve, have demonstrated utility in evaluating patients presenting with acute chest pain. With this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the non-invasive modalities that are available to evaluate acute chest pain patients suspected of cardiac etiology in the emergency room. We also added a focus on new imaging modalities that have shown to have prognostic implications in stable ischemic heart disease.
Collapse
|
31
|
Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Kelly CR, Mullish BH, Allegretti JR, Kassam Z, Putignani L, Fischer M, Keller JJ, Costello SP, Sokol H, Kump P, Satokari R, Kahn SA, Kao D, Arkkila P, Kuijper EJ, Vehreschild MJG, Pintus C, Lopetuso L, Masucci L, Scaldaferri F, Terveer EM, Nieuwdorp M, López-Sanromán A, Kupcinskas J, Hart A, Tilg H, Gasbarrini A. International consensus conference on stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut 2019; 68:2111-2121. [PMID: 31563878 PMCID: PMC6872442 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 245] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Although faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has a well-established role in the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), its widespread dissemination is limited by several obstacles, including lack of dedicated centres, difficulties with donor recruitment and complexities related to regulation and safety monitoring. Given the considerable burden of CDI on global healthcare systems, FMT should be widely available to most centres.Stool banks may guarantee reliable, timely and equitable access to FMT for patients and a traceable workflow that ensures safety and quality of procedures. In this consensus project, FMT experts from Europe, North America and Australia gathered and released statements on the following issues related to the stool banking: general principles, objectives and organisation of the stool bank; selection and screening of donors; collection, preparation and storage of faeces; services and clients; registries, monitoring of outcomes and ethical issues; and the evolving role of FMT in clinical practice,Consensus on each statement was achieved through a Delphi process and then in a plenary face-to-face meeting. For each key issue, the best available evidence was assessed, with the aim of providing guidance for the development of stool banks in order to promote accessibility to FMT in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
32
|
Kassam Z, Dubois N, Ramakrishna B, Ling K, Qazi T, Smith M, Kelly CR, Fischer M, Allegretti JR, Budree S, Panchal P, Kelly CP, Osman M. Donor Screening for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. N Engl J Med 2019; 381:2070-2072. [PMID: 31665572 DOI: 10.1056/nejmc1913670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
33
|
Allegretti JR, Kao D, Sitko J, Fischer M, Kassam Z. Early Antibiotic Use After Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Increases Risk of Treatment Failure. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 66:134-135. [PMID: 29020157 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2017] [Accepted: 07/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibiotic use within the first 8 weeks after fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may disrupt microbial engraftment and limit FMT effectiveness. We aimed to assess the burden of antibiotic use within 8 weeks of FMT and its impact on FMT efficacy.
Collapse
|
34
|
Liu W, Fakir H, Randhawa G, Kassam Z, Chung H, Chung P, Ward A, Zukotynski K, Emmett L, Bauman G. DRIVE: Defining Radiorecurrent Intraprostatic Target Volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.1834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
35
|
Gutin L, Piceno Y, Fadrosh D, Lynch K, Zydek M, Kassam Z, LaMere B, Terdiman J, Ma A, Somsouk M, Lynch S, El-Nachef N. Fecal microbiota transplant for Crohn disease: A study evaluating safety, efficacy, and microbiome profile. United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 7:807-814. [PMID: 31316785 PMCID: PMC6620877 DOI: 10.1177/2050640619845986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emerging trials suggest fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising treatment for ulcerative colitis; however, there is a paucity of data in Crohn disease (CD). OBJECTIVE The objectives of this article are to determine whether single-dose FMT improves clinical and endoscopic outcomes in CD patients and to identify meaningful changes in the microbiome in response to FMT. METHODS We performed a prospective, open-label, single-center study. Ten CD patients underwent FMT and were evaluated for clinical response (defined as decrease in Harvey-Bradshaw Index score ≥3 at one month post-FMT) and microbiome profile (16S ribosomal RNA sequencing) at one month post-FMT. RESULTS Three of 10 patients responded to FMT. Two of 10 patients had significant adverse events requiring escalation of therapy. On microbiome analysis, bacterial communities of responders had increased relative abundance of bacteria commonly found in donor gut microbiota. CONCLUSIONS Single-dose FMT in this cohort of CD patients showed modest effect and potential for harm. Responders tended to have lower baseline alpha diversity, suggesting baseline perturbation of microbiota may be an indicator of potential responders to FMT in this patient population. Controlled trials are needed to further assess the efficacy and safety of FMT in CD and determine whether FMT is a viable option in this patient population.Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT02460705.
Collapse
|
36
|
Allegretti JR, Fischer M, Sagi SV, Bohm ME, Fadda HM, Ranmal SR, Budree S, Basit AW, Glettig DL, de la Serna EL, Gentile A, Gerardin Y, Timberlake S, Sadovsky R, Smith M, Kassam Z. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Capsules with Targeted Colonic Versus Gastric Delivery in Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Comparative Cohort Analysis of High and Lose Dose. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64:1672-1678. [PMID: 30519847 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5396-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective therapy for recurrent Clostridium. difficile infection (rCDI). FMT capsules have emerged, and it is unknown if delivery location and dose impact efficacy. METHODS We compared two cohorts of patients receiving two capsule formulations: gastric release (FMTgr) and targeted colonic release (FMTcr) at two different sites. Cohort A received FMTgr at (1) high dose: 60 capsules and low dose: 30 capsules. Patients in Cohort B received FMTcr at (1) high dose: 30 capsules (2) low dose: 10 capsules. Clinical cure rates and adverse events were monitored through week 8. Paired t-tests were used to compare diversity pre- and post-FMT. RESULTS 51 rCDI patients were enrolled. Cohort A contained n = 20 and Cohort B contained n = 31. Overall cure at week 8 for FMTgr was 75% (15/20) compared to 80.6% for FMTcr, (25/31), p = 0.63. Both formulations were safe with no serious adverse events. FMTcr was superior at increasing gut microbial diversity. DISCUSSION To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare targeted delivery of FMT capsules. While both capsules were safe and efficacious, microbial engraftment patterns were superior in FMTcr.
Collapse
|
37
|
Allegretti JR, Kao D, Phelps E, Roach B, Smith J, Ganapini VC, Kassam Z, Xu H, Fischer M. Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection with Systemic Antimicrobial Therapy Following Successful Fecal Microbiota Transplant: Should We Recommend Anti-Clostridium difficile Antibiotic Prophylaxis? Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64:1668-1671. [PMID: 30632052 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5450-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The risk of a new Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) after FMT is unknown if non-CDI antibiotics are required. It is uncertain if anti-CDI prophylaxis or probiotics would reduce risk. We therefore aimed to compare the risk of CDI with and without antibiotic exposure and the benefit of concomitant anti-CDI antibiotic or probiotic prophylaxis. METHODS This is a multicenter retrospective study carried out at three large FMT referral centers of patients who underwent FMT for recurrent CDI. Patients were assessed for antibiotic use, as well as concomitant use of prophylactic anti-CDI antibiotics or probiotics. Time to CDI recurrence after FMT was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS A total of 404 patients were included: 63% were females, with a mean age of 61.3 ± 18.8 years. Mean length of post-FMT follow-up was 18.1 ± 11.9 months (range 2.2-45.2). Among the entire cohort 8.1% (n = 33) experienced a CDI recurrence. Overall, 111 patients (27.4%) used a non-CDI antibiotic, of which 16.2% (n = 18) experienced a CDI recurrence. Patients who used non-CDI antibiotics were more likely to develop CDI (HR 8.44, 95% CI 4.21-16.93, p < 0.001). The risk of CDI recurrence was not different between patients who received anti-CDI antibiotic prophylaxis to those who did not (HR = 1.88, 95% CI 0.72-4.86, p = 0.2); however, probiotic prophylaxis was associated with a greater risk of CDI recurrence (HR = 2.65, 95% CI 1.02-6.86, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION Non-CDI antibiotic use was not uncommon after successful FMT and significantly increased the risk of a new episode of CDI. In this study, we found that the prophylactic use of anti-CDI antibiotics or probiotics was not protective.
Collapse
|
38
|
Bajaj JS, Fagan A, Gavis EA, Kassam Z, Sikaroodi M, Gillevet PM. Long-term Outcomes of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients With Cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2019; 156:1921-1923.e3. [PMID: 30664879 PMCID: PMC6475479 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Revised: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
39
|
Herfarth H, Barnes EL, Long MD, Isaacs KL, Leith T, Silverstein M, Gerardin Y, Kassam Z. Combined Endoscopic and Oral Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients with Antibiotic-Dependent Pouchitis: Low Clinical Efficacy due to Low Donor Microbial Engraftment. Inflamm Intest Dis 2019; 4:1-6. [PMID: 31172007 DOI: 10.1159/000497042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective A significant number of pouch patients develop antibiotic-dependent pouchitis (ADP). Microbial dysbiosis is thought to be a major driver of clinical symptoms in ADP. The objective of this proof of concept study was to evaluate safety, efficacy, and donor microbial engraftment of an intensified fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) consisting of a single endoscopic FMT followed by daily oral FMT for 2 weeks in patients with ADP. Methods We performed a prospective placebo-controlled double-blind FMT trial in patents with established ADP and planned to enroll 20 patients in this proof of concept study. In case of non-response, patients were offered an optional open label active FMT treatment. The endpoints were safety, clinical remission without need for antibiotics during 16 weeks of follow-up, quantitative changes of fecal calprotectin (FCP), and engraftment of donor FMT as determined by metagenomic sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Results Due to a lower than expected clinical remission rate and low FMT engraftment, enrollment in the study was stopped prematurely after 6 patients were included. All 6 patients enrolled in the placebo-controlled portion failed to respond and needed antibiotic rescue therapy shortly after FMT. FCP increased in the majority of patients in the setting of relapse after FMT. In the active open label FMT extension study 1 out of 5 patients achieved antibiotic-free clinical remission. FMT engraftment after active FMT was observed only in this single patient, whereas engraftment of donor FMT occurred in none of the other patients receiving active FMT, paralleling the lack of clinical response. Conclusions Low donor FMT engraftment resulted in low clinical efficacy of FMT in patients with ADP. Before embarking on larger clinical trials with FMT in patients with ADP or other forms of pouchitis, it is mandatory to explore approaches for superior FMT engraftment.
Collapse
|
40
|
Rai RS, Tirona R, Kassam Z, Beaton MD. A196 A COMPARISON OF LIVER FIBROSIS AND SIMPLE STEATOSIS ASSESSMENT USING GADOXETIC-ACID ENHANCED MRI WITH MR ELASTOGRAPHY AND MRI FAT FRACTION. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwz006.195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
41
|
Cheng YW, Phelps E, Ganapini V, Khan N, Ouyang F, Xu H, Khanna S, Tariq R, Friedman-Moraco RJ, Woodworth MH, Dhere T, Kraft CS, Kao D, Smith J, Le L, El-Nachef N, Kaur N, Kowsika S, Ehrlich A, Smith M, Safdar N, Misch EA, Allegretti JR, Flynn A, Kassam Z, Sharfuddin A, Vuppalanchi R, Fischer M. Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and severe Clostridium difficile infection in solid organ transplant recipients: A multicenter experience. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:501-511. [PMID: 30085388 PMCID: PMC6349556 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Revised: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is recommended for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treatment; however, use in solid organ transplantation (SOT) patients has theoretical safety concerns. This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated FMT safety, effectiveness, and risk factors for failure in SOT patients. Primary cure and overall cure were defined as resolution of diarrhea or negative C difficile stool test after a single FMT or after subsequent FMT(s) ± anti-CDI antibiotics, respectively. Ninety-four SOT patients underwent FMT, 78% for recurrent CDI and 22% for severe or fulminant CDI. FMT-related adverse events (AE) occurred in 22.3% of cases, mainly comprising self-limiting conditions including nausea, abdominal pain, and FMT-related diarrhea. Severe AEs occurred in 3.2% of cases, with no FMT-related bacteremia. After FMT, 25% of patients with underlying inflammatory bowel disease had worsening disease activity, while 14% of cytomegalovirus-seropositive patients had reactivation. At 3 months, primary cure was 58.7%, while overall cure was 91.3%. Predictors of failing a single FMT included inpatient status, severe and fulminant CDI, presence of pseudomembranous colitis, and use of non-CDI antibiotics at the time of FMT. These data suggest FMT is safe in SOT patients. However, repeated FMT(s) or additional antibiotics may be needed to optimize rates of cure with FMT.
Collapse
|
42
|
Santiago M, Eysenbach L, Allegretti J, Aroniadis O, Brandt LJ, Fischer M, Grinspan A, Kelly C, Morrow C, Rodriguez M, Osman M, Kassam Z, Smith MB, Timberlake S. Microbiome predictors of dysbiosis and VRE decolonization in patients with recurrent C. difficile infections in a multi-center retrospective study. AIMS Microbiol 2019; 5:1-18. [PMID: 31384699 PMCID: PMC6646931 DOI: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The gastrointestinal microbiome is intrinsically linked to the spread of antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic treatment puts patients at risk for colonization by opportunistic pathogens like vancomycin resistant Enterococcus and Clostridioides difficile by destroying the colonization resistance provided by the commensal microbiota. Once colonized, the host is at a much higher risk for infection by that pathogen. Furthermore, we know that microbiome community differences are associated with disease states, but we do not have a good understanding of how we can use these changes to classify different patient populations. To that end, we have performed a multicenter retrospective analysis on patients who received fecal microbiota transplants to treat recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. We performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on fecal samples collected as part of this study and used these data to develop a microbiome disruption index. Our microbiome disruption index is a simple index that is predictive across cohorts, indications, and batch effects. We are able to classify pre-fecal transplant vs post-fecal transplant samples in patients with recurrent C. difficile infection, and we are able to predict, using previously-published data from a cohort of patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants, which patients would go on to develop bloodstream infections. Finally, we also identified patients in this cohort that were initially colonized with vancomycin resistant Enterococcus and that 92% (11/12) were decolonized after the transplant, but the microbiome disruption index was unable to predict such decolonization. We, however, were able to compare the relative abundance of different taxa between the two groups, and we found that increased abundance of Enterobacteriaceae predicts whether patients were colonized with vancomycin resistant Enterococcus. This work is an early step towards a better understanding of how microbiome predictors can be used to help improve patient care and patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
43
|
Hundal R, Kassam Z, Johnstone J, Lee C, Marshall JK. Fecal transplantation for recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile diarrhea. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009295.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
44
|
Kassam Z, Brinster D, Poon M, Conroy JM, Kronzon I. Mechanical prosthetic valve malfunction diagnosed by gated non-contrast computed tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018; 19:1428. [PMID: 30203069 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jey124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
45
|
Budree S, Osman M, Panchal P, Shu E, Carrellas M, Kassam Z, Allegretti J. 618. Do Clinical Factors Affect Microbial Engraftment After Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection? Open Forum Infect Dis 2018. [PMCID: PMC6254229 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofy210.625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI). Few studies have evaluated clinical factors associated with microbial engraftment. We describe microbial changes post-FMT and clinical factors impacting engraftment. Methods Patients undergoing FMT for rCDI via colonoscopy were enrolled. Clinical data and stool were collected pre- and 8 weeks post-FMT. Microbial profiles were assessed by 16S rRNA sequencing. Difference in microbial alpha and β-diversity between groups was determined. Significance testing was assessed using Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon and PERMANOVA tests. The Jensen Shannon divergence (JSD) between donor and their recipient post-FMT was used as a measure of engraftment. The association of clinical factors on engraftment was evaluated by linear regression. Results A total of 12 patients received an FMT from 12 unique donors. The efficacy rate was 92%. Mean recipient age was 60 years (range: 33–87) with more females (7/12). Recipients pre-FMT alpha diversity was significantly lower compare to donors (P = 0.04, Figure 1a). This difference dissipated post-FMT (P = 0.67). On β-diversity analysis, the recipients pre-FMT samples clustered separately from their post-FMT samples (P = 0.01, Figure 1b), with the post-FMT samples shifting closer to the donor samples. Proteobacteria was dominant in patients’ pre-FMT samples and were substantially reduced post-FMT, combined with an expansion in Bacteroidetes (Figure 2). On linear regression analysis, clinical factors (age, sex, previous recurrent CDI episodes, inflammatory bowel disease, proton pump inhibitor, immunosuppression, previous anti-CDI antibiotic courses, probiotics) were not significantly associated with engraftment outcomes. Conclusion There is a significant and durable shift in recipients’ microbial profile to resemble their donor post-FMT. Recipients’ pre-FMT clinical factors did not significantly affect microbial engraftment. Future metagenomic studies may help elucidate whether clinical factors impact engraftment. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
Collapse
|
46
|
Panchal P, Kahn S, Zellmer C, Kassam Z, Osman M, Allegretti J, Seng M, Budree S. 533. Scaling Pediatric Access to Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the United States: A Time-Series Geospatial Analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018. [PMCID: PMC6255084 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofy210.542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The rising prevalence of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in pediatrics is a public health concern. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment and is recommended in US guidelines. Universal stool banks (USB) have enabled widespread FMT access among adult patients; however, the progression of FMT uptake in pediatrics is unknown. We present a geospatial timeseries analysis of growth in pediatric FMT providers within the United States between 2013 and 2018. Methods A list of healthcare facilities associated with a USB and an FMT special interest group was geocoded using Google Maps. Spatial network analysis methods were used to create drive-time polygons for each healthcare facility with simulated traffic for 12 pm on a Wednesday. US Census data were used to estimate the percentage population living within 1, 2, and 4-hour drive time to a pediatric FMT provider cumulatively from 2013 to March 2018. Results Between 2013 and 2018, there was a rapid expansion in access to FMT to include 45 pediatric healthcare facilities (Figure 1). As of March 2018, 40.51% of the US population lives within a 1-hour drive, 62.73% within a 2-hour drive, and 89.38% within a 4-hour drive of an FMT provider (Table 1). The largest percentage increases in access occurred between 2013 and 2014 (28.43% increase within a 1-hour drive time). These 45 FMT providers include 6 community hospitals, seven private practices, and 32 academic centers. Conclusion Although these results demonstrate a rise in pediatric FMT providers across the United States, there remains a significant discrepancy in access between adult and pediatric populations, despite growing evidence of safety and efficacy of FMT. Additional efforts are needed to address barriers to FMT and improve access for pediatric patients with recurrent CDI. Disclosures P. Panchal, OpenBiome: Employee, Salary.
Collapse
|
47
|
Allegretti JR, Allegretti AS, Phelps E, Xu H, Fischer M, Kassam Z. Classifying Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Failure: An Observational Study Examining Timing and Characteristics of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Failures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16:1832-1833. [PMID: 29104129 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2017] [Revised: 10/21/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI), with cure rates higher than 80%.1-3 FMT failure is defined as diarrhea and a positive stool laboratory test for C difficile at any point during the 8-week follow-up period after FMT.4.
Collapse
|
48
|
Razik R, Osman M, Lieberman A, Allegretti JR, Kassam Z. Faecal microbiota transplantation for <em>Clostridium difficile</em> infection: a multicentre study of non-responders. Med J Aust 2018; 207:159-160. [PMID: 28814217 DOI: 10.5694/mja16.01452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 05/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
49
|
Gurry T, Gibbons SM, Nguyen LTT, Kearney SM, Ananthakrishnan A, Jiang X, Duvallet C, Kassam Z, Alm EJ. Predictability and persistence of prebiotic dietary supplementation in a healthy human cohort. Sci Rep 2018; 8:12699. [PMID: 30139999 PMCID: PMC6107591 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30783-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Dietary interventions to manipulate the human gut microbiome for improved health have received increasing attention. However, their design has been limited by a lack of understanding of the quantitative impact of diet on a host’s microbiota. We present a highly controlled diet perturbation experiment in a healthy, human cohort in which individual micronutrients are spiked in against a standardized background. We identify strong and predictable responses of specific microbes across participants consuming prebiotic spike-ins, at the level of both strains and functional genes, suggesting fine-scale resource partitioning in the human gut. No predictable responses to non-prebiotic micronutrients were found. Surprisingly, we did not observe decreases in day-to-day variability of the microbiota compared to a complex, varying diet, and instead found evidence of diet-induced stress and an associated loss of biodiversity. Our data offer insights into the effect of a low complexity diet on the gut microbiome, and suggest that effective personalized dietary interventions will rely on functional, strain-level characterization of a patient’s microbiota.
Collapse
|
50
|
Fischer M, Kao D, Kassam Z, Smith J, Louie T, Sipe B, Torbeck M, Xu H, Ouyang F, Mozaffarian D, Allegretti JR. Stool Donor Body Mass Index Does Not Affect Recipient Weight After a Single Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridium difficile Infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16:1351-1353. [PMID: 29246701 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2017] [Revised: 12/03/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|