Protocol for a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial testing behavioral economic implementation strategies to increase supplemental breast MRI screening among patients with extremely dense breasts

BACKGROUND

Increased breast density augments breast cancer risk and reduces mammography sensitivity. Supplemental breast MRI screening can significantly increase cancer detection among women with dense breasts. However, few women undergo this exam, and screening is consistently lower among racially minoritized populations. Implementation strategies informed by behavioral economics ("nudges") can promote evidence-based practices by improving clinician decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. Nudges directed toward clinicians and patients may facilitate the implementation of supplemental breast MRI.

METHODS

Approximately 1600 patients identified as having extremely dense breasts after non-actionable mammograms, along with about 1100 clinicians involved with their care at 32 primary care or OB/GYN clinics across a racially diverse academically based health system, will be enrolled. A 2 × 2 randomized pragmatic trial will test nudges to patients, clinicians, both, or neither to promote supplemental breast MRI screening. Before implementation, rapid cycle approaches informed by clinician and patient experiences and behavioral economics and health equity frameworks guided nudge design. Clinicians will be clustered into clinic groups based on existing administrative departments and care patterns, and these clinic groups will be randomized to have the nudge activated at different times per a stepped wedge design. Clinicians will receive nudges integrated into the routine mammographic report or sent through electronic health record (EHR) in-basket messaging once their clinic group (i.e., wedge) is randomized to receive the intervention. Independently, patients will be randomized to receive text message nudges or not. The primary outcome will be defined as ordering or scheduling supplemental breast MRI. Secondary outcomes include MRI completion, cancer detection rates, and false-positive rates. Patient sociodemographic information and clinic-level variables will be examined as moderators of nudge effectiveness. Qualitative interviews conducted at the trial's conclusion will examine barriers and facilitators to implementation.

DISCUSSION

This study will add to the growing literature on the effectiveness of behavioral economics-informed implementation strategies to promote evidence-based interventions. The design will facilitate testing the relative effects of nudges to patients and clinicians and the effects of moderators of nudge effectiveness, including key indicators of health disparities. The results may inform the introduction of low-cost, scalable implementation strategies to promote early breast cancer detection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05787249. Registered on March 28, 2023.

Breast density and the likelihood of malignant MRI-detected lesions in women diagnosed with breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether mammographic breast density in women diagnosed with breast cancer correlates with the total number of incidental magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected lesions and the likelihood of the lesions being malignant.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with breast cancer meeting the EUSOBI and EUSOMA criteria for preoperative breast MRI routinely undergo mammography and ultrasound before MRI at our institution. Incidental suspicious breast lesions detected in MRI are biopsied. We included patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancers between 2014 and 2019 who underwent preoperative breast MRI. One reader retrospectively determined breast density categories according to the 5th edition of the BI-RADS lexicon.

RESULTS

Of 946 patients with 973 malignant primary breast tumors, 166 (17.5%) had a total of 175 (18.0%) incidental MRI-detected lesions (82 (46.9%) malignant and 93 (53.1%) benign). High breast density according to BI-RADS was associated with higher incidence of all incidental enhancing lesions in preoperative breast MRIs: 2.66 (95% confidence interval: 1.03-6.86) higher for BI-RADS density category B, 2.68 (1.04-6.92) for category C, and 3.67 (1.36-9.93) for category D compared to category A (p < 0.05). However, high breast density did not predict higher incidence of malignant incidental lesions (p = 0.741). Incidental MRI-detected lesions in the contralateral breast were more likely benign (p < 0.001): 18 (27.3%)/48 (72.7%) vs. 64 (58.7%)/45 (41.3%) malignant/benign incidental lesions in contralateral vs. ipsilateral breasts.

CONCLUSION

Women diagnosed with breast cancer who have dense breasts have more incidental MRI-detected lesions, but higher breast density does not translate to increased likelihood of malignant incidental lesions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Dense breasts should not be considered as an indication for preoperative breast MRI in women diagnosed with breast cancer.

KEY POINTS

• The role of preoperative MRI of patients with dense breasts diagnosed with breast cancer is under debate. • Women with denser breasts have a higher incidence of all MRI-detected incidental breast lesions, but the incidence of malignant MRI-detected incidental lesions is not higher than in women with fatty breasts. • High breast density alone should not indicate preoperative breast MRI.

Repeated measures of mammographic density and texture to evaluate prediction and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature

PURPOSE

It may be important for women to have mammograms at different points in time to track changes in breast density, as fluctuations in breast density can affect breast cancer risk. This systematic review aimed to assess methods used to relate repeated mammographic images to breast cancer risk.

METHODS

The databases including Medline (Ovid) 1946-, Embase.com 1947-, CINAHL Plus 1937-, Scopus 1823-, Cochrane Library (including CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched through October 2021. Eligibility criteria included published articles in English describing the relationship of change in mammographic features with risk of breast cancer. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were included. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System and Cumulus were most commonly used for classifying mammographic density and automated assessment was used on more recent digital mammograms. Time between mammograms varied from 1 year to a median of 4.1, and only nine of the studies used more than two mammograms. Several studies showed that adding change of density or mammographic features improved model performance. Variation in risk of bias of studies was highest in prognostic factor measurement and study confounding.

CONCLUSION

This review provided an updated overview and revealed research gaps in assessment of the use of texture features, risk prediction, and AUC. We provide recommendations for future studies using repeated measure methods for mammogram images to improve risk classification and risk prediction for women to tailor screening and prevention strategies to level of risk.

Clinical and imaging modality factors impacting radiological interpretation of breast screening in young women with neurofibromatosis type 1

Young women with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have a high risk of developing breast cancer and poorer survival following breast cancer diagnosis. International guidelines recommend commencing breast screening between 30 and 35 years; however, the optimal screening modality is unestablished, and previous reports suggest that breast imaging may be complicated by the presence of intramammary and cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs). The aim of this study was to explore potential barriers to implementation of breast screening for young women with NF1.Twenty-seven women (30-47 years) with NF1 completed breast screening with breast MRI, mammogram and breast ultrasound. Nineteen probably benign/suspicious lesions were detected across 14 women. Despite the presence of breast cNFs, initial biopsy rate for participants with NF1 (37%), were comparable to a BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) cohort (25%) (P = 0.311). No cancers or intramammary neurofibromas were identified. Most participants (89%) returned for second round screening.The presence of cNF did not affect clinician confidence in 3D mammogram interpretation, although increasing breast density, frequently seen in young women, impeded confidence for 2D and 3D mammogram. Moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement on MRI was higher in the NF1 cohort (70.4%) than BRCA PV carriers (47.3%), which is an independent risk factor for breast cancer.Breast MRI was the preferred mode of screening over mammogram, as the majority (85%) with NF1 demonstrated breast density (BI-RADS 3C/4D), which hinders mammogram interpretation. For those with high breast density and high cNF breast coverage, 3D rather than 2D mammogram is preferred, if MRI is unavailable.

[Breast density assessment and organised breast cancer screening]

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater agreement of radiologists regarding the evaluation of breast density.

METHODOLOGY

Breast density assessments of 120 cases were performed by four radiologists in the city of Ouagadougou according to the fifth edition of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS atlas. Cohen's weighted kappa coefficients and Fleiss kappa coefficients were used to estimate agreement between observers and with a panel of three experts radiologists. A new evaluation of the 120 cases was performed by all raters one month after the initial evaluation.

RESULTS

Inter-rater kappa coefficients ranged from 0.55 to 0.74. The Fleiss kappa coefficient was 0.58, 0.43, 0.41, and 0.43 for categories A, B, C, and D respectively. In terms of classification into "sparse breasts" and "dense breasts", the kappa coefficients ranged from 0.47 to 0.67. Taking the results of the expert panel as a reference, the proportion of false positives in the diagnosis "dense breasts" ranged from 18.6% to 26.8%. Intraobserver agreement was good.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed moderate to good intra- and inter-raters agreements. Upgrading and harmonisation of practices will be used to empower radiologists to participate in organised breast cancer screening in Burkina Faso.

Quantitative background parenchymal enhancement and fibro-glandular density at breast MRI: Association with BRCA status

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether MRI-based measurements of fibro-glandular tissue volume, breast density (MRBD), and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) could be used to stratify two cohorts of healthy women: BRCA carriers and women at population risk of breast cancer.

METHODS

Pre-menopausal women aged 40-50 years old were scanned at 3 T, employing a standard breast protocol including a DCE-MRI (35 and 30 participants in high- and low-risk groups, respectively). The dynamic range of the DCE protocol was characterised and both breasts were masked and segmented with minimal user input to produce measurements of fibro-glandular tissue volume, MRBD, and voxelwise BPE. Statistical tests were performed to determine inter- and intra-user repeatability, evaluate the symmetry between metrics derived from left and right breasts, and investigate MRBD and BPE differences between the high- and low-risk cohorts.

RESULTS

Intra- and inter-user reproducibility in estimates of fibro-glandular tissue volume, MRBD, and median BPE estimations were good, with coefficients of variation < 15%. Coefficients of variation between left and right breasts were also low (< 25%). There were no significant correlations between fibro-glandular tissue volume, MRBD, and BPE for either risk group. However, the high-risk group had higher BPE kurtosis, although linear regression analysis did not reveal significant associations between BPE kurtosis and breast cancer risk.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no significant differences or correlations in fibro-glandular tissue volume, MRBD, or BPE metrics between the two groups of women with different levels of breast cancer risk. However, the results support further investigation into the heterogeneity of parenchymal enhancement.

KEY POINTS

• A semi-automated method enabled quantitative measurements of fibro-glandular tissue volume, breast density, and background parenchymal enhancement with minimal user intervention. • Background parenchymal enhancement was quantified over the entire parenchyma, segmented in pre-contrast images, thus avoiding region selection. • No significant differences and correlations in fibro-glandular tissue volume, breast density, and breast background parenchymal enhancement were found between two cohorts of women at high and low levels of breast cancer risk.

Breast cancer risk coordinators: Artificial intelligence-based density measurement and Mullerian-inhibiting substance

BACKGROUND

Due to its increasing prevalence, breast cancer has become a serious public health problem. In addition to the models used to identify individuals at risk, the search for fast and accurate tools has continued for years.

AIMS

In our study, we aimed to examine the correlation of mammographic density measurement and serum Mullerian-inhibiting substance (MIS) levels with an effective model such as Gail.

METHODS

Of the women whose serum MIS levels were measured in the last 1 year, 214 participants who applied for routine breast examination were included in the study. The age range was between 40 and 60. Exclusion criteria were determined as pathological mammographic findings, active breast symptom, and thoracic radiotherapy history. Mammographic density measurement (PD) was performed with the artificial intelligence-based Deep-LIBRA software. The relationship of these two parameters with the lifetime risk of developing breast cancer was examined.

RESULTS

The correlation between PD and GRP was remarkable (p < 0.01 cc:0.35). A positive correlation was observed between serum MIS levels and increased breast cancer, but it was not possible to prove this statistically (p = 0.056). It was thought that this situation was caused by perimenopausal patients. Because when the menopause group was excluded, the correlation between MIS levels and GRP decreased (p = 0.12 cc:0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

PD measurement can be considered as a promising method for the determination of individuals at risk for breast cancer in a large group of patients, but we think that serum MIS levels are not suitable for risk assessment in perimenopausal patients.

Survey of knowledge and awareness of breast density amongst Maltese Women undergoing mammography screening

INTRODUCTION

The ratio of breast glandular tissue to fatty tissue is known as breast density. This study assessed the knowledge and awareness of breast density of Maltese women undergoing mammography screening at the National Screening Unit. Increased breast density knowledge may lead to an increase in supplementary imaging attendance. In Europe, there are very limited studies assessing the knowledge and awareness of breast density, providing a solid rationale for this study to be done locally.

METHODS

Women aged 50 to 69 who were eligible for breast cancer screening at the National Screening Unit were given a validated closed-ended questionnaire as part of a quantitative, prospective, cross-sectional, and descriptive study. The questionnaire was designed to achieve the aims of the study. Using IBM-SPSS (v28) software, the data was analysed using the Friedman and Kruskal Wallis tests.

RESULTS

A total of 127 surveys were gathered, with a maximum margin of error of 8.66% based on a 95% confidence range. Breast density and the risks associated with it were not well known or understood (average scores ranging from 2.80 to 3.34 out of 5), but supplemental screening was more widely known (3.65). Participants' knowledge and awareness were correlated with their age, profession, and degree of education. Leaflets (40%) and medical experts (40%) were respondents' favourite sources of information.

CONCLUSION

The population under study lacks knowledge and awareness of breast density and the risks it entails. It's important to provide women more details about breast density. With this information, women will be empowered to seek the finest care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Although some socio-demographic parameters were linked to women's knowledge and awareness, it is advised that more research be done using a bigger sample size through interviews and other studies. Moreover, more information regarding breast density must be provided to women undergoing breast cancer screening in Malta to increase their knowledge and awareness.

Reporting breast density on chest computed tomography

Women are encouraged to have a yearly mammogram and in addition to screening for breast cancer, the radiologist reports the patient's breast density. High breast density increases a woman's risk of developing breast cancer. The number of chest computed tomography (CT) scans performed each year is increasing. Chest CT scans for lung cancer screening in high-risk patients are the standard of care. Important additional findings can be identified on these exams including coronary artery calcifications, thyroid nodules, and breast density. Our previous research has shown that breast density can be reliably graded on chest CT and is comparable to mammographic grading. However, the inter-reader agreement was higher for chest CT. It is important that thoracic radiologists include the grading of breast density in their chest CT reports. According to mammography literature, this information has proven to be helpful for early detection of breast cancer. Federal legislation recommends notifying both providers and patients about breast density on mammography and so it follows that if we see the same information on chest CT, we should report it so that at the very least the clinician can encourage their patient to have a routine mammogram.

PACS-integrated machine learning breast density classifier: clinical validation

OBJECTIVE

To test the performance of a novel machine learning-based breast density tool. The tool utilizes a convolutional neural network to predict the BI-RADS based density assessment of a study. The clinical density assessments of 33,000 mammographic examinations (164,000 images) from one academic medical center (Site A) were used for training.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an IRB approved HIPAA compliant study performed at two academic medical centers. The validation data set was composed of 500 studies from one site (Site A) and 700 from another (Site B). At Site A, each study was assessed by three breast radiologists and the majority (consensus) assessment was used as truth. At Site B, if the tool agreed with the clinical reading, then it was considered to have correctly predicted the clinical reading. In cases where the tool and the clinical reading disagreed, then the study was evaluated by three radiologists and the consensus reading was used as the clinical reading.

RESULTS

For the classification into the four categories of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®), the AI classifier had an accuracy of 84.6% at Site A and 89.7% at Site B. For binary classification (dense vs. non-dense), the AI classifier had an accuracy of 94.4% at Site A and 97.4% at Site B. In no case did the classifier disagree with the consensus reading by more than one category.

CONCLUSIONS

The automated breast density tool showed high agreement with radiologists' assessments of breast density.

International Interobserver Variability of Breast Density Assessment

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine variability in visually assessed mammographic breast density categorization among radiologists practicing in Indonesia, the Netherlands, South Africa, and the United States.

METHODS

Two hundred consecutive 2-D full-field digital screening mammograms obtained from September to December 2017 were selected and retrospectively reviewed from four global locations, for a total of 800 mammograms. Three breast radiologists in each location (team) provided consensus density assessments of all 800 mammograms using BI-RADS® density categorization. Interreader agreement was compared using Gwet's AC2 with quadratic weighting across all four density categories and Gwet's AC1 for binary comparison of combined not dense versus dense categories. Variability of distribution among teams was calculated using the Stuart-Maxwell test of marginal homogeneity across all four categories and using the McNemar test for not dense versus dense categories. To compare readers from a particular country on their own 200 mammograms versus the other three teams, density distribution was calculated using conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

For all 800 mammograms, interreader weighted agreement for distribution among four density categories was 0.86 (Gwet's AC2 with quadratic weighting; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.88), and for not dense versus dense categories, it was 0.66 (Gwet's AC1; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.70). Density distribution across four density categories was significantly different when teams were compared with one another and one team versus the other three teams combined (P < .001). Overall, all readers placed the largest number of mammograms in the scattered and heterogeneous categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Although reader teams from four different global locations had almost perfect interreader agreement in BI-RADS density categorization, variability in density distribution across four categories remained statistically significant.

A prospective cohort study identifying radiologic and tumor related factors of importance for breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an established treatment option for early breast cancer, potentially downstaging the tumor and increasing the eligibility for breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The primary aim of this study was to assess the rate of BCS after NAC, and the secondary aim was to identify predictors of application of BCS after NAC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an observational prospective cohort study of 226 patients in the SCAN-B (Clinical Trials NCT02306096) neoadjuvant cohort during 2014-2019. Eligibility for BCS was assessed at baseline and after NAC. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using covariates with clinical relevance and/or those associated with outcome (BCS versus mastectomy), including tumor subtype, by gene expression analysis.

RESULTS

The overall BCS rate was 52%, and this rate increased during the study period (from 37% to 52%). Pathological complete response was achieved in 69 patients (30%). Predictors for BCS were smaller tumor size on mammography, visibility on ultrasound, histological subtype other than lobular, benign axillary status, and a diagnosis of triple-negative or HER2-positive subtype, with a similar trend for gene expression subtypes. Mammographic density was negatively related to BCS in a dose-response pattern. In the multivariable logistic regression model, tumor stage at diagnosis and mammographic density showed the strongest association with BCS.

CONCLUSION

The rate of BCS after NAC increased during the study period to 52%. With modern treatment options for NAC the potential for tumor response and BCS eligibility might further increase.

Diagnostic accuracy of automated ACR BI-RADS breast density classification using deep convolutional neural networks

OBJECTIVES

High breast density is a well-known risk factor for breast cancer. This study aimed to develop and adapt two (MLO, CC) deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) for automatic breast density classification on synthetic 2D tomosynthesis reconstructions.

METHODS

In total, 4605 synthetic 2D images (1665 patients, age: 57 ± 37 years) were labeled according to the ACR (American College of Radiology) density (A-D). Two DCNNs with 11 convolutional layers and 3 fully connected layers each, were trained with 70% of the data, whereas 20% was used for validation. The remaining 10% were used as a separate test dataset with 460 images (380 patients). All mammograms in the test dataset were read blinded by two radiologists (reader 1 with two and reader 2 with 11 years of dedicated mammographic experience in breast imaging), and the consensus was formed as the reference standard. The inter- and intra-reader reliabilities were assessed by calculating Cohen's kappa coefficients, and diagnostic accuracy measures of automated classification were evaluated.

RESULTS

The two models for MLO and CC projections had a mean sensitivity of 80.4% (95%-CI 72.2-86.9), a specificity of 89.3% (95%-CI 85.4-92.3), and an accuracy of 89.6% (95%-CI 88.1-90.9) in the differentiation between ACR A/B and ACR C/D. DCNN versus human and inter-reader agreement were both "substantial" (Cohen's kappa: 0.61 versus 0.63).

CONCLUSION

The DCNN allows accurate, standardized, and observer-independent classification of breast density based on the ACR BI-RADS system.

KEY POINTS

• A DCNN performs on par with human experts in breast density assessment for synthetic 2D tomosynthesis reconstructions. • The proposed technique may be useful for accurate, standardized, and observer-independent breast density evaluation of tomosynthesis.

SGLT2 breast expression could affect the cardiovascular performance in pre-menopausal women with fatty vs. non fatty breast via over-inflammation and sirtuins' down regulation

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the expression of sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2), inflammatory cytokines, and sirtuins in breast fat tissue at baseline, and serum cytokines of fatty vs. non-fatty pre-menopausal women at baseline, and at 12 months of follow-up. To correlate SGLT2/cytokines/sirtuins expression to clinical variables, and their changes (Δ) at follow-up, as intima-media wall thickness (IMT), left ventricle mass (LVM), left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), and myocardial performance index (MPI), and its normalization.

BACKGROUND

Pre-menopausal women with the lowest breast fat density (fatty breast) vs. higher breast fat density (non-fatty breast) are a high-risk population for cardiovascular diseases and worse prognosis.

METHODS

We analyzed SGLT2/cytokines/sirtuins of excised fatty breasts of fatty vs. non-fatty pre-menopausal women. We correlated SGLT2/cytokines/sirtuins to Δ IMT, Δ LVM, Δ LVEF, and Δ MPI, and normal cardiac performance (NCP) at 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

fatty vs. non-fatty breast over-expressed SGLT2/inflammatory cytokines, with lowest values of sirtuins (p<0.05). We found a direct correlation between SGLT2 (R2 0.745), TNFα (R2 0.262), and ΔMPI (p<0.05), and an inverse correlation between breast density (R2 -0.198), SIRT-3 (R2-0.181), and ΔMPI (p<0.05). Fatty breast (0.761, CI 95% [0.101-0.915]), SGLT2 (0.812, CI 95% [0.674-0.978]) and SIRT-3 (1.945, CI 95% [1.201-3.148]) predicted NCP at 1 year of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

fatty vs. non-fatty breast women over-expressed SGLT2/inflammatory cytokines, and down-regulated breast sirtuins. SGLT2/inflammatory cytokines expression and inversely the tissue sirtuin 3 (tSIRT3) and breast percentage density linked to ΔMPI at 1 year of follow-up. Fatty breast and SGLT2 inversely predicted NCP; SIRT-3 increased the probability of NCP at 1 year of follow-up.

Mammographic density in the environs of multiple industrial sources

BACKGROUND

Mammographic density (MD), defined as the percentage of dense fibroglandular tissue in the breast, is a modifiable marker of the risk of developing breast cancer. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of residential proximity to an increasing number of industrial sources in MD.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1225 premenopausal women participating in the DDM-Madrid study. We calculated distances between women's houses and industries. The association between MD and proximity to an increasing number of industrial facilities and industrial clusters was explored using multiple linear regression models.

RESULTS

We found a positive linear trend between MD and proximity to an increasing number of industrial sources for all industries, at distances of 1.5 km (p-trend = 0.055) and 2 km (p-trend = 0.083). Moreover, 62 specific industrial clusters were analyzed, highlighting the significant associations found between MD and proximity to the following 6 industrial clusters: cluster 10 and women living at ≤1.5 km (β = 10.78, 95 % confidence interval (95%CI) = 1.59; 19.97) and at ≤2 km (β = 7.96, 95%CI = 0.21; 15.70); cluster 18 and women residing at ≤3 km (β = 8.48, 95%CI = 0.01; 16.96); cluster 19 and women living at ≤3 km (β = 15.72, 95%CI = 1.96; 29.49); cluster 20 and women living at ≤3 km (β = 16.95, 95%CI = 2.90; 31.00); cluster 48 and women residing at ≤3 km (β = 15.86, 95%CI = 3.95; 27.77); and cluster 52 and women living at ≤2.5 km (β = 11.09, 95%CI = 0.12; 22.05). These clusters include the following industrial activities: surface treatment of metals/plastic, surface treatment using organic solvents, production/processing of metals, recycling of animal waste, hazardous waste, urban waste-water treatment plants, inorganic chemical industry, cement and lime, galvanization, and food/beverage sector.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that women living in the proximity to an increasing number of industrial sources and those near certain types of industrial clusters have higher MD.

Investigating the prognostic value of mammographic breast density and mammographic tumor appearance in women with invasive breast cancer: The Malmö Diet and cancer study

BACKGROUND

High breast density is a risk factor for breast cancer. However, whether density is a prognostic factor is debatable. Also, tumor appearances are related to tumor characteristics. Here we investigate the relationship between breast cancer-specific survival and mammographic breast density and mammographic tumor appearances.

METHODS

Women in the Malmö Diet and Cancer study with invasive breast cancer 1991-2014 were included (n = 1116). Mammographic information, patient and tumor characteristics, vital status, and causes of death were collected through 2018. Breast cancer-specific survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models. Analyses were adjusted for established prognostic factors and stratified by detection mode.

RESULTS

High breast density did not significantly impact breast cancer-specific survival. However, there may be increased risk in women with dense breasts and screening-detected tumors (HR 1.45, CI 0.87-2.43). Neither did tumor appearance impact breast cancer-specific survival at long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer prognosis in women with high breast density on mammography does not seem impaired compared to women with less dense breasts, once the cancer is established. Neither does mammographic tumor appearance seem to inflict on prognosis, findings that can be of value in the management of breast cancer.

Effect of contraceptive hormonal therapy on mammographic breast density: A longitudinal cohort study

PURPOSE

Evaluate the longitudinal relationship between mammographic density and hormonal contraceptive use in late reproductive-aged women.

METHODS

Patients aged 35-50 years old who underwent 5 or more screening mammograms within a 7.5-year period between 2004 and 2019 in a single urban tertiary care center were randomly selected. Patients were categorized into four cohorts based on hormonal contraceptive exposure during a 2-year lead-in period and a 7.5-year study period: 1) never exposed, 2) always exposed, 3) interval hormonal contraceptive start, and 4) interval hormonal contraceptive stop. The primary outcome was difference in BI-RADS breast density category between initial and final mammograms.

RESULTS

Of the 708 patients included, long-term use of combined oral contraceptives or a levonorgestrel intrauterine device were not associated with an increase in breast density category over the 7.5-year study period, compared to those with no hormonal contraceptive exposure. Initiation of combined oral contraceptives was associated with an increase in breast density category (β = 0.31, P = 0.045); however, no difference in initial density category was noted between those exposed and those never exposed to combined oral contraceptives during the 2-year lead-in period, and discontinuation was not associated with a decrease in breast density category when compared to those with continuous exposure.

CONCLUSION(S)

Long-term use of combined oral contraceptives or a levonorgestrel intrauterine device was not associated with an increase in BI-RADS breast density category. Initiation of a combined oral contraceptive was associated with an increase in breast density category, although this may be a transient effect.

Changes in Automated Mammographic Breast Density Can Predict Pathological Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Mammographic density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer that can change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). This study aimed to evaluate percent changes in volumetric breast density (ΔVbd%) before and after NCT measured automatically and determine its value as a predictive marker of pathological response to NCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 357 patients with breast cancer treated between January 2014 and December 2016 were included. An automated volumetric breast density (Vbd) measurement method was used to calculate Vbd on mammography before and after NCT. Patients were divided into three groups according to ΔVbd%, calculated as follows: Vbd (post-NCT - pre-NCT)/pre-NCT Vbd × 100 (%). The stable, decreased, and increased groups were defined as -20% ≤ ΔVbd% ≤ 20%, ΔVbd% < -20%, and ΔVbd% > 20%, respectively. Pathological complete response (pCR) was considered to be achieved after NCT if there was no evidence of invasive carcinoma in the breast or metastatic tumors in the axillary and regional lymph nodes on surgical pathology. The association between ΔVbd% grouping and pCR was analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The interval between the pre-NCT and post-NCT mammograms ranged from 79 to 250 days (median, 170 days). In the multivariable analysis, ΔVbd% grouping (odds ratio for pCR of 0.420 [95% confidence interval, 0.195-0.905; P = 0.027] for the decreased group compared with the stable group), N stage at diagnosis, histologic grade, and breast cancer subtype were significantly associated with pCR. This tendency was more evident in the luminal B-like and triple-negative subtypes.

CONCLUSION

ΔVbd% was associated with pCR in breast cancer after NCT, with the decreased group showing a lower rate of pCR than the stable group. Automated measurement of ΔVbd% may help predict the NCT response and prognosis in breast cancer.

Analysis of the relationship between global breast density and maximum points of breast density in a sample of Brazilian women

Maximum points of breast density have been strongly associated with breast cancer masking than global breast density, which is a widely used measure today. The objective of this work was to verify the correlation between two measures of global breast density (VBD_GLOBAL and DAB_GLOBAL) and a measure of maximum point breast density (VBD_MP). Mammographic images of 4.020 patients were analyzed using the Volpara software, which calculated or extracted the variables needed for the study from the DICOM header. Two-tailed partial correlation tests were performed between the variable VBD_GLOBAL with VBD_MP and DAB_GLOBAL with VBD_MP in the following contexts: keeping PA and CBT constant, keeping only CBT constant, and keeping only PA constant. The Pearson test was also used to verify the bivariate correlation between VBD_GLOBAL with VBD_MP and DAB_GLOBAL with VBD_MP. For the two-tailed partial correlation tests between VBD_GLOBAL with VBD_MP, keeping the CBT and PA variables constant resulted in r = 0.845 (p < 0.05). When kept constant only the CBT, r = 0.875 (p < 0.05), and keeping only the PA constant r = 0.866 (p < 0.05). Pearson's test showed r = 0.883 (p < 0.05). For the two-tailed partial correlation tests between the DAB_GLOBAL with VBD_MP quantities, the results were r = 0.675 (p < 0.05), r = 0.725 (p < 0.05) and r = 0.701 (p < 0.05) for constant CBT and PA, constant CBT and constant PA, respectively, while the Pearson test resulted in r = 0.738 (p < 0.05). We conclude that a woman who has high global breast density is also highly likely to have maximum points of breast density.

Changes in mammographic density and risk of breast cancer among a diverse cohort of women undergoing mammography screening

PURPOSE

Mammographic density (MD) is a strong breast cancer risk factor. MD may change over time, with potential implications for breast cancer risk. Few studies have assessed associations between MD change and breast cancer in racially diverse populations. We investigated the relationships between MD and MD change over time and breast cancer risk in a large, diverse screening cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 8462 women who underwent ≥ 2 screening mammograms from Sept. 2010 to Jan. 2015 (N = 20,766 exams); 185 breast cancers were diagnosed 1-7 years after screening. Breast percent density (PD) and dense area (DA) were estimated from raw digital mammograms (Hologic Inc.) using LIBRA (v1.0.4). For each MD measure, we modeled breast density change between two sequential visits as a function of demographic and risk covariates. We used Cox regression to examine whether varying degrees of breast density change were associated with breast cancer risk, accounting for multiple exams per woman.

RESULTS

PD at any screen was significantly associated with breast cancer risk (hazard ratio (HR) for PD = 1.03 (95% CI [1.01, 1.05], p < 0.0005), but neither change in breast density nor more extreme than expected changes in breast density were associated with breast cancer risk. We found no evidence of differences in density change or breast cancer risk due to density change by race. Results using DA were essentially identical.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a large racially diverse cohort, we found no evidence of association between short-term change in MD and risk of breast cancer, suggesting that short-term MD change is not a strong predictor for risk.

Background enhancement in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM): are there qualitative and quantitative differences between imaging systems?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of the digital mammography imaging system on overall background enhancement on recombined contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images, the overall background enhancement of two different mammography systems was compared.

METHODS

In a retrospective single-center study, CESM images of n = 129 female patients who underwent CESM between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed independently by two radiologists. Two mammography machines of different manufacturers were compared qualitatively using a Likert-scale from 1 (minimal) to 4 (marked overall background enhancement) and quantitatively by placing a region of interest and measuring the intensity enhancement. Lesion conspicuity was analyzed using a Likert-scale from 1 (lesion not reliably distinguishable) to 5 (excellent lesion conspicuity). A multivariate regression was performed to test for potential biases on the quantitative results.

RESULTS

Significant differences in qualitative background enhancement measurements between machines A and B were observed for both readers (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001). The quantitative evaluation showed significant differences in background enhancement with an average difference of 75.69 (99%-CI [74.37, 77.02]; p < 0.001). Lesion conspicuity was better for machine A for the first and second reader respectively (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001). The factor machine was the only influencing factor (p < 0.001). The factors contrast agent, breast density, age, and menstrual cycle could be excluded as potential biases.

CONCLUSION

Mammography machines seem to significantly influence overall background enhancement qualitatively and quantitatively; thus, an impact on diagnostic accuracy appears possible.

KEY POINTS

• Overall background enhancement on CESM differs between different vendors qualitatively and quantitatively. • Our retrospective single-center study showed consistent results of the qualitative and quantitative data analysis of overall background enhancement. • Lesion conspicuity is higher in cases of lower background enhancement on CESM.

Validity of computed mean compressed fibroglandular tissue thickness and breast composition for stratification of masking risk in Japanese women

BACKGROUND

The volumetric measurement system for mammographic breast density is a high-precision objective method for evaluating the percentage of fibroglandular tissue volume (FG%). Nonetheless, FG% does not precisely correlate with subjective visual estimation (SVE) and shows poor evaluation performance regarding masking risk in patients with comparatively thin compressed breast thickness (CBT), commonly found in Japanese women. We considered that the mean compressed fibroglandular tissue thickness (mCGT), which incorporates the CBT element into the evaluation of breast density, may better predict masking risk.

METHODS

Volumetric measurements and SVEs were performed on mammograms of 108 breast cancer patients from our center. mCGT was calculated as the product of CBT and FG%. SVE was classified using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System classification, 5th edition. Subsequently, the performance of mCGT, SVE, and FG% in predicting masking risk was estimated using the AUC.

RESULTS

The AUC values of mCGT and SVE were 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.92) and 0.78 (0.66-0.86), respectively (P = 0.16). The AUC of the FG% was 0.65 (0.52-0.77), which was significantly lower than that of mCGT (P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of mCGT in predicting negative detection were 89% and 71%, respectively; of SVE 83% and 61% (versus 72% and 57% with FG%), suggesting that mCGT was superior to FG% in both sensitivity and specificity, and comparable with SVE.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective mCGT calculated from the volumetric measurement system will highly likely be useful in evaluating breast density and supporting visual assessment for masking risk stratification.

Age-related change in mammographic breast density of women without history of breast cancer over a 10-year retrospective study

Background

Women with higher breast density are at higher risk of developing breast cancer. Breast density is known to affect sensitivity to mammography and to decrease with age. However, the age change and associated factors involved are still unknown. This study aimed to investigate changes in breast density and the associated factors over a 10-year period.

Materials and Methods

The study included 221 women who had undergone eight or more mammograms for 10 years (2011-2020), were between 25 and 65 years of age, and had no abnormalities as of 2011. Breast density on mammographic images was classified into four categories: fatty, scattered, heterogeneously dense, and extremely dense. Breast density was determined using an image classification program with a Microsoft Lobe's machine-learning model. The temporal changes in breast density over a 10-year period were classified into three categories: no change, decrease, and increase. An ordinal logistic analysis was performed with the three groups of temporal changes in breast density categories as the objective variable and the four items of breast density at the start, BMI, age, and changes in BMI as explanatory variables.

Results

As of 2011, the mean age of the 221 patients was 47 ± 7.3 years, and breast density category 3 scattered was the most common (67.0%). The 10-year change in breast density was 64.7% unchanged, 25.3% decreased, and 10% increased. BMI was increased by 64.7% of women. Breast density decreased in 76.6% of the category at the start: extremely dense breast density at the start was correlated with body mass index (BMI). The results of the ordinal logistic analysis indicated that contributing factors to breast density classification were higher breast density at the start (odds ratio = 0.044; 95% CI [0.025-0.076]), higher BMI at the start (odds ratio = 0.76; 95% CI [0.70-0.83]), increased BMI (odds ratio = 0.57; 95% CI [0.36-0.92]), and age in the 40s at the start (odds ratio = 0.49; 95% CI [0.24-0.99]). No statistically significant differences were found for medical history.

Conclusion

Breast density decreased in approximately 25% of women over a 10-year period. Women with decreased breast density tended to have higher breast density or higher BMI at the start. This effect was more pronounced among women in their 40s at the start. Women with these conditions may experience changes in breast density over time. The present study would be useful to consider effective screening mammography based on breast density.

An association between mammographic breast density and fine particulate matter among postmenopausal women

Increasing breast density is a risk factor for breast cancer. Geographic variations in breast density may be due to differences in lifestyle and diet, as well as environmental factors such as air pollution exposure. However, these environmental contributors have not been established. In this study, we evaluated an association between air pollution and mammographic breast density. The study population for this study was postmenopausal women who had undergone screening mammography at the Center for Preventive Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, from April 2004 to September 2018. Individual mammography results were obtained from electronic charts. The ambient air pollution (PM_2.5) density of the locations of interest, namely, the patients' residential areas during the study period, was obtained. The mean PM_2.5 exposure levels for 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were determined. A generalized estimating equations model was used to examine the association between air pollution density and dense breast. A total of 44,280 mammography results were included in this study, and 29,135 were classified in the non-dense breast group and 15,145 in the dense breast group. There was a 3% increase in the odds of having dense breasts after 1 year (OR = 1.027, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.019-1.034) and 3 years of PM_2.5 exposure (OR = 1.029, 95% CI 1.022-1.036). This further increased to 4% at 5-year exposure (OR = 1.044, 95% CI 1.037-1.052) and 5% at 7-year exposure (OR = 1.053, 95% CI 1.044-1.063). The risk for dense breasts increased if the factors of smoking, family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, and history of childbirth were present.

Automatic mammographic breast density classification in Chinese women: clinical validation of a deep learning model

BACKGROUND

High breast density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. As such, high consistency and accuracy in breast density assessment is necessary.

PURPOSE

To validate our proposed deep learning (DL) model and explore its impact on radiologists on density assessments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 3732 mammographic cases were collected as a validated set: 1686 cases before the implementation of the DL model and 2046 cases after the DL model. Five radiologists were divided into two groups (junior and senior groups) to assess all mammograms using either two- or four-category evaluation. Linear-weighted kappa (K) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) statistics were used to analyze the consistency between radiologists before and after implementation of the DL model.

RESULTS

The accuracy and clinical acceptance of the DL model for the junior group were 96.3% and 96.8% for two-category evaluation, and 85.6% and 89.6% for four-category evaluation, respectively. For the senior group, the accuracy and clinical acceptance were 95.5% and 98.0% for two-category evaluation, and 84.3% and 95.3% for four-category evaluation, respectively. The consistency within the junior group, the senior group, and among all radiologists improved with the help of the DL model. For two-category, their K and ICC values improved to 0.81, 0.81, and 0.80 from 0.73, 0.75, and 0.76. And for four-category, their K and ICC values improved to 0.81, 0.82, and 0.82 from 0.73, 0.79, and 0.78, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The DL model showed high accuracy and clinical acceptance in breast density categories. It is helpful to improve radiologists' consistency.