Gastric schwannoma: A retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, treatment options, and prognosis of patients with gastric schwannoma (GS).

METHODS

Patients who were pathologically diagnosed with GS between April 2011 and October 2022 were enrolled. The data of clinical characteristics, pathological features, treatment options, and clinical outcomes were collected and compared between GS patients who underwent endoscopic resection (ER) and surgical resection (SR).

RESULTS

Of the 32 cases, 23 underwent SR and nine underwent ER. The median tumor size was significantly smaller in ER group than in SR group (12.0 vs. 40.0 mm, P < 0.001), while patients in SR group were older than those in ER group (54.5 ± 10.6 vs. 45.3 ± 10.9 years, P = 0.036). Moreover, tumors in ER group were more likely to exhibit an intraluminal pattern (100% vs. 26.1%, P < 0.001). Patients in ER group had significantly lower hospitalization cost (25859.2 ± 8623.9 vs. 44953.0 ± 13083.8 RMB, P = 0.011) than those in SR group. No differences were found between the two groups in terms of R0 resection rate, operative time, estimated blood loss, adverse events, and recurrence rate. All patients were followed up for 4-96 months (mean: 35 months; median: 23 months), during which no evidence of recurrence or metastasis was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ER and SR are safe and effective treatment modalities for the management of GS, with ER being associated with lower medical costs compared to SR. The majority of GS are benign and do not recur, with little possibility of malignant transformation.

Endoscopic Resection of Early Luminal Cancer

Gastrointestinal cancers can have severe consequences if diagnosed at a late stage but can be cured when detected and resected at an early stage. In recent years, the significance of endoscopic screening for gastrointestinal cancers has been established, leading to the identification of early-stage cancers and precancerous lesions. Consequently, endoscopic removal of gastrointestinal tumors has emerged as an effective means of cancer treatment and prevention. This article delves into the indications, techniques, and safety measures associated with endoscopic resection of early-stage luminal cancer within the gastrointestinal tract.

Endoscopic Treatment for Gastric Subepithelial Tumor

Most gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) are asymptomatic and are often incidentally discovered during endoscopic procedures conducted for unrelated reasons. Although surveillance is sufficient for the majority of gastric SETs, certain cases necessitate proactive management. Laparoscopic wedge resection, although a viable treatment option, has its limitations, particularly in cases where SETs (especially those with intraluminal growth) are not visualized on the peritoneal side. Recent advances in endoscopic instruments and technology have paved the way for the feasibility of endoscopic resection of SETs. Several promising endoscopic techniques have emerged for gastric SET resection, including submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection, endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR), laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS), and non-exposure EFTR (non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery and non-exposure simple suturing EFTR). This study aimed to discuss the indications, methods, and outcomes of endoscopic therapy for gastric SETs. In addition, a simplified diagram of the category of SETs according to the therapeutic indications and an algorithm for the endoscopic management of SET is suggested.

New hope for esophageal stricture prevention: A prospective single-center trial on acellular dermal matrix

BACKGROUND

Given the high incidence of esophageal cancer in China, an increasing number of patients there are undergoing endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD). Although the 5-year survival rate after ESD can exceed 95%, esophageal stricture, the most common and serious postoperative complication, affects the long-term prognosis of patients and the quality of life. Autologous mucosal grafts have proven to be successful in preventing stricture after ESD for early esophageal cancer.

AIM

To examine the viability of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) as an alternative to autologous mucosa for the prevention of stricture after ESD.

METHODS

This is a prospective, single-center, controlled study. Consecutive patients who underwent ESD surgery and were willing to undergo autologous mucosal transplantation were recruited between January 1 and December 31, 2017. Consecutive patients who underwent ESD surgery and were willing to undergo ADM transplantation were recruited between January 1 to December 31, 2019. A final three-year follow-up of patients who received transplants was conducted.

RESULTS

Based on the current incidence of esophageal stricture, the sample size required for both the autologous mucosal graft group and the ADM group was calculated to be 160 cases. Due to various factors, a total of 20 patients with autologous mucosal grafts and 25 with ADM grafts were recruited. Based on the inclusion exclusion and withdrawal criteria, 9 patients ultimately received autologous mucosal grafts and completed the follow-up, while 11 patients received ADM grafts and completed the follow-up. Finally, there were 2 cases of stenosis in the autologous mucosal transplantation group with a stenosis rate of 22.22% and 2 cases of stenosis in the ADM transplantation group with a stenosis rate of 18.18%, with no significant difference noted between the groups (P = 0.94).

CONCLUSION

In this prospective, single-center, controlled trial, we compared the effectiveness of autologous mucosa transplantation and ADM for the prevention of esophageal stricture. Due to certain condition limitations, we were unable to recruit sufficient subjects meeting our target requirements. However, we implemented strict inclusion, exclusion, and withdrawal criteria and successfully completed three years of follow-up, resulting in valuable clinical insights. Based on our findings, we hypothesize that ADM may be similarly effective to autologous mucosal transplantation in the prevention of esophageal stricture, offering a comparable and alternative approach. This study provides a new therapeutic idea and direction for the prevention of esophageal stricture.

Risk factors for complications and incomplete resection after endoscopic resection for duodenal submucosal tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic resection (ER) has been used to remove submucosal tumors (SMTs) in recent years; however, duodenal ER is associated with high rates of immediate or delayed bleeding and perforation. Whether ER can be recommended for the treatment of duodenal SMTs remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes associated with the ER of duodenal SMTs and to assess possible predictive factors for complications and incomplete resection.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 141 patients with duodenal SMTs. The therapeutic outcomes from ER and procedure-related complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 141 patients, 78.7% achieved complete resection and nine (6.4%) developed complications. The multivariate analysis suggested that location near the duodenal papilla (P = 0.010) and diameter exceeding 15 mm (P = 0.091) of duodenal SMTs were independent risk factors for complications in ER. Besides, submucosal fibrosis (P = 0.042), location near the duodenal papilla (P = 0.049), and irregular morphology (P = 0.067) were independent risk factors for incomplete resection.

CONCLUSIONS

ER can be recommended as an effective and minimally invasive treatment for duodenal SMTs.

Outcomes of endoscopic full thickness resection in the colon rectum at an Italian tertiary center

PURPOSE

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is an innovative technique for the treatment of colonic lesions not feasible by conventional endoscopic resection. Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a Full-Thickness Resection Device (FTRD) for colonic lesions in a high-volume tertiary referral center.

METHODS

A review of a prospectively collected database on patients that underwent EFTR with FTRD for colonic lesions from June 2016 to January 2021 at our institution was performed. Data regarding the clinical history, previous endoscopic treatments, pathological examination, technical and histological success, and follow-up were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (26 males, median age 69 years) underwent FTRD for colonic lesion. Eighteen lesions were in the left colon, three in the transverse, and 12 in the right colon. The median size of the lesions was 13 (range 10-40) mm. Resection was technically successful in 94% of patients. The mean hospital stay was 3.2 (SD ± 1.2) days. Adverse events were reported in four cases (11.4%). Histological complete resection (R0) was achieved in 93.9% of cases. Endoscopic follow-up was available in 96.8% of patients, at a median duration of 14.6 months (3-46 months). Recurrence was observed in 19.4% of cases at a median time of 3 months (3-7 months). Five patients had multiple FTRD performed, with R0 resection in three cases. In this subset, adverse events were observed in 40% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

FTRD is safe and feasible for standard indication. The non-negligible rate of recurrence observed suggests the need for close endoscopic follow-up in these patients. Multiple EFTR could help achieve complete resection in selected cases; however, in this setting, a higher risk of adverse events was observed.

Case of Concomitant Endoscopic Treatment of Achalasia with Superficial Esophageal Cancer

Achalasia, a rare motility disorder of the esophagus, is generally accepted as a premalignant disorder. This paper presents the case of a 72-year-old male with achalasia and synchronous superficial esophageal cancer who experienced dysphagia symptoms for five years. As achalasia is associated with an increased risk of esophageal cancer, both can be treated simultaneously if detected at the time of diagnosis. Achalasia and synchronous esophageal cancer are rarely detected and treated endoscopically. This paper reports a case of concurrent successful treatment.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: It is time to consider the quality of its outcomes

Endoscopic resection, particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), is widely used as a standard treatment modality for early gastric cancer (EGC) when the risk of lymph node metastasis is negligible. Compared with surgical gastrectomy, ESD is a minimally invasive procedure with additional advantages, such as preservation of the entire stomach and maintenance of the patient's quality of life. However, not all patients achieve curative resection after ESD of EGC. Several patients require surgical gastrectomy after ESD to achieve a curative treatment. Additional surgery after ESD, owing to non-curative resection, places considerable emotional and financial burdens on patients. Recently, as the number of endoscopists performing ESD has increased, the rate of non-curative resection after ESD has increased correspondingly. In order to decrease the non-curative resection rate, as well as determine the ideal rate of non-curative resection after ESD, it is time to consider quality indicators for the outcomes of ESD for EGC.

Hybrid laparo-endoscopic access: New approach to surgical treatment for giant fibrovascular polyp of esophagus: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Fibrovascular polyps are rare type of esophageal submucosal neoplasms. They are highly vascularized and can cause difficulty swallowing and even fatal complications such as uncontrolled bleeding and death caused by asphyxiation in case of tumor migration to oropharynx. In the article we describe a novel hybrid technique to surgical treatment – an endoscopic submucosal dissection with laparoscopic removal of the tumor.

CASE SUMMARY

The patient with a giant fibrovascular esophageal polyp presented with cough, discomfort in the throat, difficulty swallowing, and an episode of tumor migration into oropharynx. The patient was investigated with several imaging studies and was diagnosed with a giant highly vascularized esophageal fibrovascular polyp. The follow-up period of eight months accompanied with no complications.

CONCLUSION

This method has been shown to have comparable rates of recurrence and a low risk of complications.

Metachronous primary gastric cancer after endoscopic resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for developing metachronous primary Gastric Cancer (GC) after Endoscopic Resection (ER) for esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC).

METHODS

We studied 283 patients with esophageal SCC who underwent ER. The study outcomes were as follows: (1) incidence of metachronous primary GC after ER; and (2) predictors for the development of metachronous primary GC after ER by the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 43.1 months (1.81-79.1), and the 3-year cumulative incidence of metachronous primary GC was 6.5% (95%CI: 4.1-10.4). The incidence of metachronous primary GC during the follow-up period was 2.31 per 100 person-years. The frequencies of severe gastric atrophy and macrocytosis at the timing of ER were significantly higher in patients with than without metachronous primary GC (91.7% vs. 73.2%, p = 0.0422, 20.8% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.0046, respectively). Severe gastric atrophy was associated with the development of metachronous primary GC (sex-and-age adjusted hazard ratio (HR) [95%CI] = 4.12 [0.95-27.78], p = 0.0093). Macrocytosis was associated with the development of metachronous primary GC (sex-and-age adjusted HR = 4.76 [1.75-13.0], p = 0.0012) and found to be an independent predictor for metachronous primary GC by multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (HR [95%CI] = 4.35 [1.60-11.84], p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe gastric atrophy and macrocytosis should be noted in the development of metachronous primary GC after ER for esophageal SCC. In particular, macrocytosis at the timing of ER was considered an important predictor.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER

UMIN000001676.

Cold snare polypectomy for duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: a prospective international cohort study

Background and study aims In patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), endoscopic resection of duodenal adenomas is commonly performed to prevent cancer and prevent or defer duodenal surgery. However, based on studies using different resection techniques, adverse events (AEs) of polypectomy in the duodenum can be significant. We hypothesized that cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a safe technique for duodenal adenomas in FAP and evaluated its outcomes in our centers. Patients and methods We performed a prospective international cohort study including FAP patients who underwent CSP for one or more superficial non-ampullary duodenal adenomas of any size between 2020 and 2022. At that time, this technique was common practice in our centers for superficial duodenal adenomas. The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraprocedural and post-procedural AEs. Results In total, 133 CSPs were performed in 39 patients with FAP (1-18 per session). Median adenoma size was 10 mm (interquartile range 8-15 mm), ranging from 5 to 40 mm; 27 adenomas were ≥20 mm (20%). Of the 133 polypectomies, 109 (82%) were performed after submucosal injection. Sixty-one adenomas (46%) were resected en bloc and 72 (54%) piecemeal. Macroscopic radical resection was achieved for 129 polypectomies (97%). Deep mural injury type II occurred in three polyps (2%) with no delayed perforation after prophylactic clipping. There were no clinically significant bleeds, perforations or other post-procedural AEs. Histopathology showed low-grade dysplasia in all 133 adenomas. Conclusions CSP for (multiple) superficial non-ampullary duodenal adenomas in FAP seems feasible and safe. Long-term prospective research is needed to evaluate whether protocolized duodenal polypectomies prevent cancer and surgery.

Analysis of the development of gastric cancer after resecting colorectal lesions using large-scale health insurance claims data

BACKGROUND

Colorectal endoscopic resection (C-ER) is spreading due to the increase of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Japan. Gastric cancer (GC) sometimes occurs after C-ER. We aimed to analyze the status of GC after C-ER using large-scale data.

METHODS

We retrospectively used commercially anonymized health insurance claims data of 5.71 million patients from 2005 to 2018, and extracted 62,392 patients ≥ 50 years old who received C-ER. The incidence and risk factors of GC were analyzed. Additionally, subjects were divided into ≥ 2 cm group and < 2 cm group and risks of GC were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age (range) was 58 (50-75) years and the overall rate of GC was 0.68% (423/62,392). Multivariate analysis showed that significant risk factors for GC [odds rates (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI)] were colorectal lesion size ≥ 2 cm (1.75, 1.24-2.47, p = 0.002), age ≥ 65 y.o. (1.65, 1.31-2.07, p < 0.001), male (2.35, 1. 76-3.13, p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (1.40, 1.02-1.92, p = 0.035), liver disease (1.54, 1.06-2.24, p = 0.025), Helicobacter pylori infection (2.10, 1.65-2.67, p < 0.001), chronic atrophic gastritis (1.58, 1.14-2.18, p = 0.006), and CRC (1.72, 1.10-2.68, p = 0.017). The rate of GC in the ≥ 2 cm was significantly higher than that in < 2 cm groups (1.17% and 0.65%, p < 0.001). According to the number of significant risk factors, the rates of GC and the hazard ratios of GC (95%CI) were 0.64% and 3.64 (2.20-6.02) and 1.95% and 11.17 (6.57-19.00) for patient with 1-2 and ≥ 3 risk factors, compared with patients without risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Using large-scale data, risk factors for GC, including colorecal lesions ≥ 2 cm after C-ER could be investigated.

Onset Time and Characteristics of Postprocedural Bleeding after Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Lesions: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Postprocedural bleeding is a major adverse event after endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions, but the optimal surveillance time after endoscopy is unclear. In this study, we determined onset time and characteristics of postprocedural bleeding events.

METHODS

We retrospectively screened patients who underwent endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions at three German hospitals between 2010 and 2019 for postprocedural bleeding events using billing codes. Only patients who required re-endoscopy were included for analysis. For identified patients, we collected demographic data, clinical courses, characteristics of colorectal lesions, and procedure-related variables. Factors associated with late-onset bleeding were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

From a total of 6,820 patients with eligible billing codes, we identified 113 cases with postprocedural bleeding after endoscopic mucosal (61.9%) or snare resection (38.1%) that required re-endoscopy. The median size of the culprit lesion was 20 mm (interquartile range 14-30 mm). The median onset time of postprocedural bleeding was day 3 (interquartile range: 1-6.5 days), with 48.7% of events occurring within 48 h. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrates that a continued intake of antiplatelet drugs (OR: 3.98, 95% CI: 0.89-10.12, p = 0.025) and a flat morphology of the colorectal lesion (OR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.08-8.01, p = 0.031) were associated with an increased risk for late postprocedural bleeding (>48 h), whereas intraprocedural bleeding was associated with a decreased risk (OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.50, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Significant postprocedural bleeding can occur up to 18 days after endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions, but was predominantly observed within 48 h. Continued intake of antiplatelet drugs and a flat polyp morphology are associated with risk for late postprocedural bleeding.

Optimizing management for early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma: longitudinal results from a multidisciplinary program

BACKGROUND

The management of early-stage esophageal cancer is nuanced. A multidisciplinary approach may optimize management through selection of candidates for surgical or endoscopic therapies. The objective of this research was to examine long-term outcomes of patients with early-stage esophageal cancer who undergo treatment with endoscopic resection or surgery.

METHODS

Data on patient demographics, co-morbidities, pathology results, OS and RFS were obtained for both the endoscopic resection group and esophagectomy group. Univariate analysis of OS and RFS were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method with calculation of the log-rank test. Multivariate cox-proportional hazards models were created for OS and RFS using a hypothesis-driven approach. A multivariate logistic regression model was created to identify predictors of esophagectomy among patients undergoing initial endoscopic resection.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients were included. The median OS for the surgery group was 67.0 months compared to 74.0 months in the endoscopic resection group (log-rank p = 0.93). The median RFS for the surgery group was 109.4 months compared to 63.3 months in the endoscopic resection group (log-rank p = 0.0127). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing endoscopic resection had significantly worse RFS (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.09-6.00; p = 0.032), but equivalent OS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.46-2.32; p = 0.941), compared to patients undergoing esophagectomy. High-grade disease (OR 5.43, 95% CI 1.13-26.10; p = 0.035) and submucosal involvement (OR 7.75, 95% CI 1.90-31.40; p = 0.004) were identified as significant predictors of proceeding to esophagectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Through a multidisciplinary approach, patients with early-stage esophageal cancer achieve excellent RFS and OS. Submucosal involvement and high-grade disease place patients at increased risk for local disease recurrence; these patients may undergo endoscopic resection safely if treated with a multidisciplinary approach incorporating endoscopic surveillance and surgical consultation. Further risk-stratification models may enable better patient selection and optimization of long-term outcomes.

Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer

Endoscopic resection (ER) is an effective treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) without metastases. Existing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is easy to perform, has few complications, and can be applied when the lesion size is small. However, en bloc and complete resection rates vary depending on the size and severity of the lesion. EMR using the cap-mounted panendoscopic method and EMR after circumferential preamputation of the lesion are useful in the treatment of EGC. However, completely oversized lesions (≥2 cm) and lesions associated with ulcers or submucosal fibrosis are more likely to fail resection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection has been widely used to resect tumors larger than 2 cm in diameter and has a higher acceptable complication rate and en bloc and complete resection rates than EMR. ER for EGC is superior to surgical resection in terms of improving patient quality of life. Additionally, compared to surgery, emergency rooms have a lower rate of treatment-related complications, shorter hospital stays, and lower costs. Accordingly, the indications for ER are expanding in the field of therapeutic endoscopy. Long-term outcomes regarding recurrence are excellent in both absolute and extended criteria for ER in EGC. Close surveillance should be performed after ER to detect early metachronous gastric cancer and precancerous lesions that can be treated with ER. Follow-up gastroscopy and abdominopelvic computed tomography scans every 6 to 12 months are recommended for patients who undergo curative ER for EGC on absolute or extended criteria.

The optimal interval of surveillance gastroscopy after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Due to the possible metachronous recurrence of gastric neoplasia, surveillance gastroscopy is mandatory after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia. However, there is no consensus on the surveillance gastroscopy interval. This study aimed to find an optimal interval of surveillance gastroscopy and to investigate the risk factors for metachronous gastric neoplasia.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed retrospectively in patients who underwent endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia in 3 teaching hospitals from June 2012 to July 2022. Patients were divided into two groups; annual surveillance vs. biannual surveillance. The incidence of metachronous gastric neoplasia was identified, and the risk factors for metachronous gastric neoplasia were investigated.

RESULTS

Among the 1,533 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia, 677 patients were enrolled in this study (annual surveillance 302, biannual surveillance 375). Metachronous gastric neoplasia was observed in 61 patients (annual surveillance 26/302, biannual surveillance 32/375, P = 0.989), and metachronous gastric adenocarcinoma was observed in 26 patients (annual surveillance 13/302, biannual surveillance 13/375, P = 0.582). All the lesions were removed by endoscopic resection successfully. In a multivariate analysis, severe atrophic gastritis on gastroscopy was an independent risk factor for metachronous gastric adenocarcinoma (odds ratio 3.8, 95% confidence interval 1.4‒10.1; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Meticulous observation to detect the metachronous gastric neoplasia is necessary for patients with severe atrophic gastritis during follow-up gastroscopy after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia. Annual surveillance gastroscopy might be enough after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia.

Predictive Factors for the Outcome of Unsupervised Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection During the Initial Learning Curve with Prevalence-Based Indication

BACKGROUND

For an adequate educational strategy of ESD in non-Asian settings with prevalence-based indication it is essential to define adequate lesions, suitable for the beginner without on-site expert-supervision.

AIMS

We analyzed possible predictors for outcome parameters of effectiveness and safety during the initial learning curve.

METHODS

The first 120 ESDs of four operators (n = 480), performed between 2007 and 2020 in four tertiary hospitals, were enrolled. Uni-/multivariable regression analysis was done with sex, age, pretreated lesion, lesion size, organ, and organ-based localization as possible independent predictors for en bloc resection (EBR), complication, and resection speed.

RESULTS

Rates of EBR, complication, and resection speed were 84.5%, 14.2%, and 6.20 (± 4.45) cm2/h. Independent predictors for EBR were pretreated lesion (OR 0.27 [0.13-0.57], p < 0.001) and non-colonic ESD (OR 2.29 [1.26-4.17] (rectum)/5.72 [2.36-13.89] (stomach)/7.80 [2.60-23.42] (esophagus), p < 0.001), for complication pretreated lesion (OR 3.04 [1.46-6.34], p < 0.001) and lesion size (OR 1.02 [1.004-1.04], p = 0.012) and for resection speed pretreated lesion (RC - 3.10 [- 4.39 to - 1.81], p < 0.001), lesion size (RC 0.13 [0.11-0.16], p < 0.001) and male patient (RC - 1.11 [- 1.85 to - 0.37], p < 0.001). We found no significant difference in the incidence of technically unsuccessful resections in esophageal (1/84), gastric (3/113), rectal (7/181), and colonic (3/101) ESDs (p = 0.76). Technical failure was mainly caused by complication and fibrosis/pretreatment.

CONCLUSION

During the initial learning curve of an unsupervised ESD program with prevalence-based indication, pretreated lesions and colonic ESDs should be avoided. In contrast, lesion size and organ-based localizations have less predictive value for the outcome.

Treatment outcomes of the patient with sinonasal mucosal melanoma: the role of endoscopic resection and postoperative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for sinonasal mucosal melanoma is surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). Our treatment strategy comprises endoscopic resection and PORT. We performed combined endoscopic and open resection or applied an external approach alone when sufficient resection was difficult to achieve endoscopically. The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of our treatment strategy.

METHODS

We assessed 30 patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma who underwent definitive therapy between January 2002 and April 2021, and conducted a retrospective analysis. The median follow-up period was 2.2 years. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for the calculation of survival rates, the cumulative incidence of distant metastasis, and local recurrence.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients underwent surgery. The other two patients were treated by definitive proton beam therapy. Twenty-one of 28 (75%) patients underwent resection by endoscopic approach alone. Postoperative radiotherapy was performed for all 28 patients who underwent surgery. Twenty-one patients (70%) experienced recurrence during the observation period. Overall, distant metastasis was observed in 19 patients. Twelve patients died during the observation period, with 10 of the 12 patients (83%) dying of distant metastasis. The overall survival rate at 2 and 5 years was 70% and 46%, respectively. The cumulative incidence rate of distant metastasis at 2 years was 63%, while the 2-year cumulative incidence rate of local recurrence was 6.7%.

CONCLUSION

The local disease was controlled by our treatment strategy. To improve treatment outcomes, control of the distant metastasis is needed.

Feasibility of endoscopic resection and impact of endoscopic ultrasound-based surveillance on colorectal subepithelial tumors

BACKGROUND

Owing to the rising number of screening endoscopies and instrumental advances in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), colorectal subepithelial tumors (SETs) are being increasingly detected. We aimed to determine the feasibility of endoscopic resection (ER) and the impact of EUS-based surveillance on colorectal SETs.

METHODS

The medical records of 984 patients with incidentally detected colorectal SETs between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Overall, 577 colorectal SETs underwent ER, and 71 colorectal SETs underwent serial colonoscopy for > 12 months.

RESULTS

The mean tumor size (± standard deviation) of 577 colorectal SETs for which ER was performed was 7.0 ± 5.7 (median, 55; range, 1-50) mm; 475 tumors were located in the rectum and 102, in the colon. En bloc resection was achieved in 560/577 treated lesions (97.1%), and complete resection was achieved in 516/577 (89.4%). ER-related adverse events occurred in 15/577 (2.6%) patients. SETs originating from the muscularis propria showed a higher risk of ER-related adverse events and perforation than SETs arising from the mucosal or submucosal layer (odds ratio [OR] 19.786, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.556-85.919; P = 0.002 and OR 141.250, 95% CI 11.596-1720.492; P = 0.046, respectively). Seventy-one patients were followed up after EUS without any treatment for > 12 months, during which three showed progression; eight, regression; and sixty, no changes.

CONCLUSIONS

ER for colorectal SETs showed excellent efficacy and safety. Additionally, colorectal SETs without high-risk features in surveillance with colonoscopy showed an excellent prognosis.

Risk factors for postoperative complications in endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multi-center analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection (ER) is widely used in treating gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs); however, complications occur frequently after resection. We aimed to determine factors associated with postoperative complications for ER of gGISTs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multi-center, observational study. Consecutive patients who underwent ER of gGISTs at five institutes from January 2013 to December 2022 were analyzed. The risk factors for delayed bleeding and postoperative infection were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 513 cases were finally analyzed. Of 513 patients, 27 (5.3%) had delayed bleeding and 69 (13.4%) had a postoperative infection. Multivariate analysis indicated that risk factors for delayed bleeding were long operative time (OR = 50.655; 95% CI, 13.777-186.252; P < 0.001) and severe intraoperative bleeding (OR = 4.731, 95% CI, 1.139-19.658; P = 0.032), and risk factors for postoperative infection were long operative time (OR = 13.749, 95% CI, 6.884-27.461; P < 0.001) and perforation (OR = 4.339, 95% CI, 2.178-8.644; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicated the risk factors for postoperative complications in ER of gGISTs. Long operation time is a common risk factor for delayed bleeding and postoperative infection. Patients with these risk factors should be given careful observation postoperatively.

Is it enough to observe less than 2 cm sized gastric SET?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The recent surge in demand for screening endoscopy has led to an increased detection of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). According to current guideline, SETs less than 2 cm in size are recommended for periodic surveillance. In light of recent advancement in therapeutic endoscopy in resection of small SET, we analyzed the histopathological features and the effectiveness of endoscopic resection for these small SETs.

METHODS

Retrospectively study was performed on 74 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of gastric small (≤ 2 cm) upper gastrointestinal tract SETs. The outcomes including histopathology and en bloc resection were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean SET size was 11.69 ± 5.11 mm. The mean procedure time was 81.26 ± 42.53 min. Of the 74 patients, 28 patients had leiomyomas, 26 had gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), 14 had ectopic pancreas, 4 had lipomas, and 2 had neuroendocrine tumors. Among those with GIST, two patients exhibited high-risk histology. All patients underwent successful and uneventful endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic resection can be recommended even for the small gastric SETs. In our study, we found that SETs with a size of less than 2 cm have significant proportion of GISTs which harbor malignant transformation potential.

Goldilocks principle of minimally invasive surgery for gastric subepithelial tumors

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery had been tailored to individual cases of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) after comparing the clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER), laparoscopic resection (LR), and hybrid methods.

AIM

To study the use of Goldilocks principle to determine the best form of minimally invasive surgery for gastric SETs.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 194 patients of gastric SETs with high probability of surgical intervention were included. All patients underwent tumor resection in the operating theater between January 2013 and December 2021. The patients were divided into two groups, ER or LR, according to the tumor characteristics and the initial intent of intervention. Few patients in the ER group required further backup laparoscopic surgery after an incomplete ER. The patients who had converted open surgery were excluded. A logistic regression model was used to assess the associations between patient characteristics and the likelihood of a treatment strategy. The area under the curve was used to assess the discriminative ability of tumor size and Youden's index to determine the optimal cut-off tumor size.

RESULTS

One-hundred ninety-four patients (100 in the ER group and 94 in the LR group) underwent tumor resection in the operating theater. In the ER group, 27 patients required backup laparoscopic surgery after an incomplete ER. The patients in the ER group had small tumor sizes and shorter procedure durations while the patients in the LR group had large tumor sizes, exophytic growth, malignancy, and tumors that were more often located in the middle or lower third of the stomach. Both groups had similar durations of hospital stays and a similar rate of major postoperative complications. The patients in the ER group who underwent backup surgery required longer procedures (56.4 min) and prolonged stays (2 d) compared to the patients in the LR group without the increased rate of major postoperative complications. The optimal cut-off point for the tumor size for laparoscopic surgery was 2.15 cm.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary teamwork leads to the adoption of different strategies to yield efficient clinical outcomes according to the tumor characteristics.

Preoperative Embolization of Primary Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma: Is Embolization of Internal Carotid Artery Branches Necessary?

PURPOSE

To determine the effects of blood supply from internal carotid artery (ICA) on the surgical outcomes of primary juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) after transarterial embolization (TAE).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on primary JNA patients who underwent TAE and endoscopic resection in our hospital between December 2020 and June 2022. The angiography images of these patients were reviewed, and then they were divided into ICA + external carotid artery (ECA) feeding group and ECA feeding group according to whether the ICA branches were part of the feeding arteries. Tumors in ICA + ECA feeding group were fed by both ICA and ECA branches, while tumors in ECA feeding group were fed by ECA branches alone. All patients underwent tumor resection immediately after ECA feeding branches embolization. None of the patients underwent ICA feeding branches embolization. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, blood loss, adverse events, residual and recurrence were collected, and case-control analysis was performed for the two groups. Differences in characteristics between the groups were tested using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon tests.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included in this study: nine in ICA + ECA feeding group and nine in ECA feeding group. The median blood loss was 700 mL (IQR 550-1000 mL) in ICA + ECA feeding group versus 300 mL (IQR 200-1000 mL) in ECA feeding group, with no significant statistical difference (P = 0.306). Residual tumor was found in one patient (11.1%) in both groups. Recurrence was not observed in any patient. There were no adverse events from embolization and resection in either group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this small series suggest that the presence of blood supply from ICA branches in primary JNA has no significant effect on intraoperative blood loss, adverse event, residual and postoperative recurrence. Therefore, we do not recommend routine preoperative embolization of ICA branches.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4, Case-control.