Total arch replacement with extended branched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repair for type A dissection improves operative outcome

Objective

Emergency surgical repair is the standard treatment for acute aortic dissection type A. However, the surgical risk of total arch replacement remains high. The Viabahn Open Revascularization TEChnique has been used for supra-aortic reconstruction during total arch replacement. This Cleveland Clinic technique is called "branched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repair." Our total arch replacement with reconstructed extended branched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repair requires no unnecessary cervical artery exposure. We compared the outcomes of extended branched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repair and conventional total arch replacement in acute aortic dissection type A.

Methods

We compared the clinical course of patients undergoing total arch replacement using sutureless direct branch vessel stent grafting with frozen elephant trunk (extended branched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repair) for acute aortic dissection type A with patients undergoing conventional total arch replacement. For the procedure, the aortic arch was transected circumferentially distal to the brachiocephalic artery origin. Frozen elephant trunk was fenestrated by heating with a cautery, and the self-expandable stent graft was delivered into the branch vessels through the fenestration.

Results

Of 58 cases, 21 and 37 were classified in the extended branched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repair and conventional total arch replacement groups, respectively. The times (minutes) of selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (75 ± 24, 118 ± 47), total operation (313 ± 83, 470 ± 151), and cardiopulmonary bypass (195 ± 46, 277 ± 96) were significantly better in the extended branched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repair group (P < .001). Six surgical deaths occurred: 2 (9%) in the extended branched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repair group and 4 (10%) in the conventional total arch replacement group. In all cases, only 1 patient (2%) in the conventional total arch replacement group had a branch artery-related complication during the postoperative follow-up period. In the extended branched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repair group, blood product use significantly decreased (P < .05).

Conclusions

Extended branched stented anastomosis frozen elephant trunk repair has shown comparable safety and efficacy to conventional total arch replacement and can be used for acute aortic dissection type A emergency repair. It optimizes true lumen perfusion and facilitates supra-aortic artery remodeling.

Right axillary artery cannulation in acute type A aortic dissection with involvement of the right axillary artery

OBJECTIVE

The right axillary artery is currently recommended for arterial cannulation in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. However, the feasibility of cannulation on a dissected right axillary artery remains undetermined. The objective was to examine the feasibility of cannulation on a dissected right axillary artery.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2020, 835 patients who underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair were included in this study. Cannulation strategy and perioperative outcomes of patients who did and did not have right axillary artery dissection were compared. Propensity score matching and logistic regression were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients had right axillary artery dissection, and 711 patients did not. Direct right axillary artery cannulation was used for cardiopulmonary bypass in the majority of patients, but with a lower rate in patients with right axillary artery dissection (n = 88 [71.0%] vs n = 579 [81.4%], P = .007). Right axillary artery cannulation failure (n = 3 [2.4%] vs n = 5 [0.7%], P = .102) and related complications (n = 1 [0.8%] vs n = 6 [0.8%], P = 1.000) were rare in both groups. In-hospital mortality (n = 18 [14.5%] vs n = 59 [8.3%], P = .027) and stroke (n = 14 [11.3%] vs n = 42 [5.9%], P = .027) were significantly higher in the right axillary artery dissection group, but after propensity score matching, in-hospital outcomes were comparable. Right axillary artery dissection was not a risk factor for mortality, stroke, right axillary artery cannulation not performed, or right axillary artery cannulation failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct right axillary artery cannulation is feasible for most patients with acute type A aortic dissection with right axillary artery dissection.

Safety and arch complications after hemiarch versus total arch replacement with stented elephant trunk in acute type 1 dissection: Is a stent graft always beneficial?

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the efficacy of total arch replacement with stented elephant trunk by comparing it with hemiarch replacement with and without open stent graft for acute aortic dissection type 1.

METHODS

We reviewed records of 177 patients who underwent hemiarch replacement (HAR group) (concomitant open stent, 125) and 98 patients who underwent total arch replacement (TAR group) (concomitant stented elephant trunk, 91) for acute type 1 dissection. Compared with the TAR group, the HAR group was older (68.1 vs 60.9 years; P < .01) and had more thrombosed false lumen (28.8% vs 4.1%, P < .01).

RESULTS

In-hospital death occurred for 7 patients in the HAR group and 1 patient in the TAR group (P = .17). More patients in the TAR group had a postoperative thrombosed false lumen, compared with the HAR group (68% vs 54%, P = .03). In patients with preoperative nonthrombosed false lumen in the HAR group, the rate of postoperative thrombosis was significantly lower than with versus without an open stent (31% vs 65%, P = .01). The rate of freedom from an aortic arch event in the TAR group at 5 years was significantly greater than that in the HAR group (100% vs 83.7%, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Stented elephant trunk with TAR provided a high rate of false lumen thrombosis and a low incidence of arch events, whereas an open stent during HAR was not beneficial in terms of false lumen thrombosis and arch event prevention.

Aortic Arch Repair Using Open and Hybrid Techniques: A Systematic Review

Early surgical intervention is critical for treatment of aortic arch aneurysms and dissections, but limited comprehensive data exist to define the optimal approach for surgical management with respect to postoperative outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the 2 most common surgical approaches-total arch replacement and hybrid arch repair. We referenced the electronic PubMed database reporting on outcomes for these surgical approaches from inception to June 2022. Our initial search query returned a total of 2,517 records. All records were independently screened for adherence to our inclusion criteria and a total of 12 retrospective cohort studies were identified as appropriate for inclusion. Across the included studies, a total of 618 patients underwent hybrid repair, as compared to 2,104 patients who underwent total arch replacement. We found that most of the literature supported the findings of similar rates of permanent neurologic dysfunction, acute kidney injury, and short-term mortality between approaches and higher postoperative reintervention rates following hybrid repair. Reported outcomes of studies included in this review often conflicted regarding midterm and long-term survival, as well as hospital and intensive care unit length of stay following open and hybrid repair. Future studies should address midterm and long-term survival with a prospective study design.

The long-term impact of acute renal failure after aortic arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term impact of developing acute renal failure (ARF) on survival after open aortic arch reconstruction for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD).

METHODS

This was an observational study of consecutive aortic surgeries from 2007 to 2021. Patients with ATAAD were identified via a prospectively maintained institutional database and were stratified by the presence or absence of postoperative ARF (by RIFLE criteria). Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 601 patients undergoing open surgery for ATAAD were identified, of which 516 (85.9%) did not develop postoperative ARF, while 85 (14.1%) developed ARF, with a median follow-up time of 4.6 years (1.6, 7.9). Baseline characteristics were similar across each group, except for higher rates of branch vessel malperfusion and lower preoperative ejection fraction in the ARF group. Patients with ARF underwent more total arch replacement and elephant trunk procedures, with longer cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest times than patients without ARF. ARF was associated with worse short-term outcomes, including increased in-hospital mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, higher rates of sepsis, more blood transfusions, and longer length of hospital stay. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were significantly lower in the ARF group, compared to the group without ARF (p < .001, log-rank test). After multivariable adjustment, the development of postoperative ARF was significantly associated with an increased hazard of death over the study's follow-up time-period (hazard ratio: 2.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.95, 3.86, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ARF is a highly morbid postoperative event that may adversely impact long-term survival after aortic surgery.

Comparison of Single Axillary vs. Dual Arterial Cannulation for Acute Type a Aortic Dissection: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background

The optimal arterial cannulation site for acute aortic dissection repair is unclear, especially for complex arch surgery. Axillary artery cannulation is widely accepted but adding femoral artery cannulation to it was considered to potentially improve perfusion and early outcomes. To clarify this point, a comparison of perioperative outcomes for these two different cannulation strategies was conducted regarding the pathological features of dissection.

Methods

From January 2010 to December 2019, 927 consecutive patients underwent a total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection. The data, including detailed pathological features, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Propensity score matching and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used for adjusting confounders that are potentially related to the outcome.

Results

A total of 523 patients (56.3%) accepted a dual arterial cannulation (DAC group), and 406 patients (43.7%) received a single axillary artery cannulation (SAC group). In total, 388 pairs of patients were well-matched. Whether before or after adjusting the preoperative characteristics by matching, there were no significant differences in operative mortality (6.7 vs. 5.4%, P = 0.420 before matching; 5.4 vs. 5.4%, P = 1 after matching), stroke (6.7 vs. 5.4%, P = 0.420 before matching; 6.4 vs. 5.2%, P = 0.435 after matching), spinal cord injury (5 vs. 5.7%, P = 0.640 before matching; 5.4 vs. 5.7%, P = 1. After matching), and acute renal failure requiring dialysis (13.8 vs. 9.6%, P =0.050 before matching; 12.6 vs. 9.5%, P = 0.174) between the two groups. Dual arterial cannulation was not an independent protective factor of operative mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–1.86), stroke (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.65–2.11), spinal cord injury (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.65–2.11), and acute renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.78–1.97) after adjusting for confounding factors by multivariable logistic regression analysis. In the subgroup analysis, no advantage of dual arterial cannulation was found for a particular population.

Conclusions

Single axillary artery cannulation was competent in the complex arch repair for acute aortic dissection, presenting with a satisfactory result as dual arterial cannulation. Adding femoral artery cannulation was necessary when a sufficient flow volume could not be achieved by axillary artery cannulation or when a lower limb malperfusion existed.

High-TSH Subclinical Hypothyroidism Is Associated With Postoperative Mortality in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Subclinical hypothyroidism can negatively affect the cardiovascular system and increase the risk of mortality, especially for individuals with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels above 10 mU/L. We investigated the relationship between high-TSH subclinical hypothyroidism and postoperative mortality in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients.

METHOD

We enrolled 146 patients with ATAAD who underwent aortic surgery in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from July 2016 to November 2018. Thyroid hormone levels were obtained before surgery, and participants were divided into a ≥10mU/L TSH level group and a <10mU/L level group. Cox proportional hazard regression and subgroup analysis were conducted to examine the association of preoperative high-TSH subclinical hypothyroidism with postoperative mortality.

RESULT

Participants with preoperative high-TSH (≥10mU/L) subclinical hypothyroidism tended to have longer hospitalization stays after surgery [16.0 (IQR 11.0-21.0) days vs 12.5 (IQR 8.0-16.0) days, P=0.001]. During the first 30 days after operation, 15 of 146 patients died (10.3%); during a median of 3.16 (IQR 1.76-4.56) years of follow-up, 24 patients died (16.4%). Cox proportional hazard regression showed that preoperative high-TSH subclinical hypothyroidism was independently associated with 30-day mortality (HR=6.2, 95% CI, 1.7-22.0, P=0.005) and postoperative mortality after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, hypertension, ejection fraction, diabetes and history of PCI (HR=3.4, 95% CI, 1.4-8.0, P=0.005).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that preoperative high-TSH subclinical hypothyroidism was an independent predictor of postoperative mortality in ATAAD patients who underwent aortic surgery.

Factors for Acute Kidney Injury Following Total Arch Replacement and Association with Temperature Management During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single-center Retrospective Observational Study

Many patients develop acute kidney injury (AKI) after vascular surgery. In this retrospective observational study, we investigated the risk factors for AKI defined using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria after total arch replacement (TAR). Additionally, we investigated the influence of temperature manage-ment during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on postoperative renal function by propensity score-matched anal-ysis. We retrospectively analyzed 161 consecutive patients who underwent TAR between 2016 and 2019. Postoperative AKI occurred in 48.7% of the patients. In the multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.95, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.56-8.27, p = 0.002), ACE inhibitors/ARB medication (OR 3.19, 95%CI 1.49-6.82, p = 0.003), preoperative chronic kidney disease (OR 2.47, 95%CI 1.17-5.23, p = 0.02), pro-longed CPB time (OR 2.36, 95%CI 1.05-5.34, p = 0.04), and lower body ischemic time during CPB (OR 2.20, 95%CI 1.05-4.46, p = 0.04) were identified as independent risk factors for AKI. Propensity score-matched anal-ysis showed no significant difference in the risk of AKI following TAR between mild hypothermia or normo-thermia and moderate hypothermia (37.2% vs. 41.9%, p = 0.83). In conclusion, modifiable risk factors for AKI included prolonged CPB time and lower body ischemic time. Temperature management during CPB had no clear effect on outcomes.

Open aortic arch surgery: 10 years' single-center experience

Introduction

Open aortic arch surgery is a complex cardiac surgical procedure.

Aim

We reviewed the 10-year outcomes of elective aortic arch aneurysm surgery in a single cardiac surgical center.

Material and methods

The analysis includes all patients who underwent elective aortic arch surgery at our institution between January 2010 and December 2020. The study population was divided into group A consisting of patients operated on during the first 5 years, and group B, including patients operated on during the subsequent 5 years. The groups were compared with regard to baseline characteristics, scope of the surgery, operative and postoperative data as well as morbidity and mortality.

Results

Eighty-six elective aortic arch procedures were performed during the analyzed period, including 25 (29%) patients in group A and 61 (71%) patients in group B. The hemiarch procedure was more frequently performed in group A (17 patients, 68%) in comparison to group B (21 patients, 34%) (p = 0.008). Stroke was recorded in 6 (20%) patients from group A and 5 (8.2%) patients from group B (p = 0.002). Five-year survival was 60 ±9.8% for group A, and 81 ±6.2% for group B (log-rank test, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

After completion of the learning curve, open aortic arch surgery is associated with acceptable early mortality, low incidence of stroke, and a high 5-year survival rate.

En Bloc Arch Reconstruction With the Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique for Acute Type a Aortic Dissection

Objective: The study objective was to evaluate the effect of en bloc arch reconstruction with frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for acute type A aortic dissection.

Methods: 41 patients with acute Stanford type A dissection underwent en bloc arch reconstruction combined with FET implantation between April 2018 and August 2020. The mean age of the patients was 46 ± 13 years, and 9 patients were female. One patient had Marfan syndrome. Six patients had pericardial tamponade, 9 had pleural effusion, 5 had transient cerebral ischemic attack, and 3 had chronic kidney disease.

Results: The hospital mortality rate was 9.8% (4 patients). 2 (4.9%) patients had stroke, 23 (56.1%) had acute kidney injury, and 5 (12.2%) had renal failure requiring hemodialysis. During follow-up, the rate of complete false lumen thrombosis was 91.6% (33/36) around the FET, 69.4% (25/36) at the diaphragmatic level, and 27.8% (10/36) at the superior mesenteric artery level. The true lumen diameter at the same three levels of the descending aorta increased significantly while the false lumen diameter reduced at the two levels: pulmonary bifurcation and the diaphragm. The 1-, 2-and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 90.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 81.2–99.2], 84.2% (95% CI, 70.1–98.3) and 70.2% (95% CI, 42.2–98), respectively.

Conclusions: In patients with acute type A dissection, en bloc arch reconstruction with FET technique appeared to be feasible and effective with early clinical follow-up results. Future studies including a large sample size and long-term follow-up are required to evaluate the efficacy.

Early and Long-Term Follow-Up for Chronic Type B and Type Non-A Non-B Aortic Dissection Using the Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the early and long-term outcomes of a single center using a frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure for chronic type B or non-A non-B aortic dissection.

Methods: From February 2009 to December 2019, 79 patients diagnosed with chronic type B or non-A non-B aortic dissection who underwent the FET procedure were included in the present study. We analyzed operation mortality and early and long-term outcomes, including complications, survival and interventions.

Results: The operation mortality rate was 5.1% (4/79). Spinal cord injury occurred in 3.8% (3/79), stroke in 2.5% (2/79), and acute renal failure in 5.1% (4/79). The median follow-up time was 53 months. The overall survival rates were 96.2, 92.3, 88.0, 79.8, and 76.2% at 1/2, 1, 3, 5 and 7 years, respectively. Moreover, 79.3% of patients did not require distal aortic reintervention at 7 years. The overall survival in the subacute group was superior to that in the chronic group (P = 0.047).

Conclusion: The FET technique is a safe and feasible approach for treating chronic type B and non-A non-B aortic dissection in patients who have contraindications for primary endovascular aortic repair. The technique combines the advantages of both open surgical repair and endovascular intervention, providing comparable early and long-term follow-up outcomes and freedom from reintervention.

Endovascular repair of the aortic arch: State of the art

BACKGROUND

Open total arch replacement remains the gold standard treatment for aneurysms and dissections involving the aortic arch. However, high-risk surgical candidates may benefit from endovascular techniques to reduce the risk of perioperative mortality and morbidity, especially neurologic complications. Numerous endografts are available for investigational use in the aortic arch as part of investigational device exemption (IDE) programs. Some devices are fenestrated or scalloped, while others are branched, ranging from single branch to triple branch stent-grafts. Furthermore, chimney techniques and in situ fenestration may be utilized in bailout or emergent situations.

RESULTS

Initial results describing outcomes of complete endovascular repair of the aortic arch are encouraging, with current data estimating that technical success ranges from 84.2% to 100%. Moreover, operative mortality may be as high as 13.2%, while neurologic complications also remain common, with stroke rates being as high as 20% and spinal cord ischemia being as high as 3.1%. However, more data are necessary to determine the comparative treatment effect of endovascular stent-grafting of the aortic arch, compared with conventional open and hybrid repairs. Longitudinal follow-up is also lacking, which will determine the long-term durability of endografts in the aortic arch. Nevertheless, endovascular repair represents an important opportunity for improving outcomes in patients with complex and potentially devastating pathologies of the aortic arch.

Long-term outcomes of hemiarch replacement with hypothermic circulatory arrest and retrograde cerebral perfusion

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to report outcomes of hemiarch replacement with hypothermic circulatory arrest and retrograde cerebral perfusion, and secondarily, to report outcomes of this operative approach by type of underlying aortic disease.

METHODS

This was an observational study of aortic surgeries from 2010 to 2018. All patients who underwent hemiarch replacement with retrograde cerebral perfusion were included, whereas patients undergoing partial or total arch replacement or concomitant elephant trunk procedures were excluded. Patients were dichotomized into 2 groups by underlying aortic disease; that is, acute aortic dissection (AAD) or aneurysmal degeneration of the aorta. These groups were analyzed for differences in short-term postoperative outcomes, including stroke and operative mortality (Society of Thoracic Surgeons definition). Multivariable Cox analysis was performed to identify variables associated with long-term survival after hemiarch replacement.

RESULTS

A total of 500 patients undergoing hemiarch replacement with hypothermic circulatory arrest plus retrograde cerebral perfusion were identified, of whom 53.0% had aneurysmal disease and 47.0% had AAD. For the entire cohort, operative mortality was 6.4%, whereas stroke occurred in 4.6% of patients. Comparing AAD with aneurysm, operative mortality and stroke rates were similar across each group. Five-year survival was 84.4% ± 0.02% for the entire hemiarch cohort, whereas 5-year survival was 88.0% ± 0.02% for the aneurysm subgroup and was 80.5% ± 0.03% for the AAD subgroup. On multivariable analysis, AAD was not associated with an increased hazard of death, compared with aneurysm (P = .790).

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity and mortality after hemiarch replacement with hypothermic circulatory arrest plus retrograde cerebral perfusion are acceptably low, and this operative approach may be as advantageous for AAD as it is for aneurysm.

Paving the way for E-vita open NEO hybrid prosthesis implantation for complex aortic arch disease in Asia-Pacific

We report first in man implantations of the newly designed Evita-open-NEO hybrid prosthesis for complex aortic arch disease from three different countries in Asia-Pacific including instructions on how to proceed with perioperative coagulation management.

Plasma S100β and neuron-specific enolase, but not neuroglobin, are associated with early cognitive dysfunction after total arch replacement surgery: A pilot study

To investigate whether plasma concentrations of S100β protein, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and neuroglobin (NGB) correlate with early postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in patients undergoing total arch replacement.This prospective study analyzed 40 patients who underwent total arch replacement combined with stented elephant trunk implantation at our hospital between March 2017 and January 2019. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) preoperatively, on the day after extubation and on day 7 after surgery. Plasma levels of S100β, NSE, and NGB POCD were assayed preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 24 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass. POCD was defined as a decrease of at least 1 unit in the MMSE score from before surgery until day 7, and patients were stratified into those who experienced POCD or not. The 2 groups were compared in clinicodemographic characteristics and plasma levels of the 3 proteins.Plasma levels of all 3 biomarkers increased significantly during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Levels of S100β and NSE, but not NGB, were significantly higher in the 15 patients who showed POCD than in the remainder who did not. For prediction of early POCD, S100β showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.87), sensitivity of 48%, and specificity of 87%. The corresponding values for NSE were 0.77 (95%CI 0.60-0.94), 92%, and 67%. Together, S100β and NSE showed an AUC of 0.81 (95%CI 0.66-0.96), sensitivity of 73%, and specificity of 80%. NGB did not significantly predict early POCD (AUC 0.62, 95%CI 0.43-0.80).Plasma S100β protein and NSE, but not NGB, may help predict early POCD after total arch replacement.

Early Outcomes of Three Total Arch Replacement Strategies for DeBakey Type I Aortic Dissection

Background: This study employed three surgical techniques: total arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk (FET), aortic balloon occlusion technique (ABO) and hybrid aortic arch repair (HAR) on patients with type I aortic dissection in Fuwai Hospital, aiming to compare the early outcomes of these surgical armamentariums.

Methods: From January 2016 to December 2018, an overall 633 patients (431 of TAR+FET, 122 of HAR, and 80 of ABO) with type I aortic dissection were included in the study. Thirty-day mortality, stroke, paraplegia, re-exploration for bleeding, and renal replacement therapy were compared using the matching weight method (MWM).

Results: After MWM process, the baseline characteristics were comparable among three TAR groups. It showed that ABO group had the longest cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.001) and aortic cross-clamp time (p < 0.001), while the operation time was longest in the HAR group (p = 0.039). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality among groups (p = 0.783). Furthermore, the incidence of stroke (p = 0.679), paraplegia (p = 0.104), re-exploration for bleeding (p = 0.313), and CRRT (p = 0.834) demonstrated no significant difference. Of note, no significant differences were found regarding these outcomes even before using MWM.

Conclusions: Based on the early outcomes, the three TAR approaches were equally applicable to type I aortic dissection. We may choose the specific procedure relatively flexibly according to patient status and surgeon's expertise. Importantly, long-term investigations are warranted to determine whether above approaches remain to be of equivalent efficacy and safety.

Comparative study of Japanese frozen elephant trunk device for open aortic arch repairs

OBJECTIVE

We performed a multicenter prospective comparative study to determine the impact of a Japanese frozen elephant trunk device on total arch replacement compared with conventional repair without it.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2019, a total of 684 patients (frozen elephant trunk procedure; n = 369; conventional repair, n = 315) from 41 institutions were enrolled. The 2 procedures were selected according to each center's strategy.

RESULTS

The frozen elephant trunk procedure was applied more for aortic dissection, whereas the conventional repairs were predominantly performed for aneurysms. In the former, only hypothermic circulatory arrest time was reduced among the intraoperative parameters. Although there were no differences in the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates (0.8% and 1.6%, respectively, for the frozen elephant trunk procedure vs 0.3% and 0.6%, respectively, for conventional repair), the neurologic complication rates were significantly higher in stroke (5.7% vs 2.2%; P = .022) and paraplegia (1.6% vs 0%; P = .023). In the propensity score matching analyses using 11 variables, statistical significance disappeared in the differences for mortality and neurologic morbidity (stroke and paraplegia/paraparesis) rates of 194 patients of each group, although they were still higher for the frozen elephant trunk procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The early outcomes of total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk procedure were acceptable despite its higher prevalence of emergency or redo surgery, which was comparable to that of the conventional repair. This procedure had higher rates of spinal cord injury than the conventional repair, which is a disadvantage of this approach.

Postoperative hypothermia after total aortic arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection-multivariate analysis and risk identification for postoperative hypothermia occurrence

Background

Postoperative hypothermia (PH) is a common physiological abnormality associated with increased morbidity and mortality after non-cardiac surgery. The incidence, risk factors of PH and its impact on early outcomes after total aortic arch replacement are not clear.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent total arch replacement from January 2013 to December 2016 at our institution. Basic variables, procedural and postoperative early outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed for statistical interpretation. The early outcomes were compared between patients with or without PH.

Results

A total of 300 patients (age 53.8±11.5 years, female 63, 21.0%) with acute type A aortic dissection underwent total arch replacement. Forty-four patients (14.7%) developed PH. The independent risk factors of PH are age and the intraoperative lowest bladder temperature. There is no significant difference in major postoperative morbidity and mortality between patients with or without PH.

Conclusions

The incidence of PH after total arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection is relatively low. The independent risk factors of PH in this population include age and the intraoperative lowest bladder temperature. With comprehensive rewarming strategy upon arrival at the ICU, the PH is easy to be corrected, and the adverse effect of transient PH on early outcomes after arch surgery is minimal.

Total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of total aortic arch replacement with proximalization of distal anastomosis using the frozen elephant trunk technique with the J Graft FROZENIX (Japan Lifeline, Tokyo, Japan) and Gelweave Lupiae (Vascutek Terumo Inc, Scotland, United Kingdom) graft (distal anastomosis performed in zones 1 and 2) in patients with acute Stanford type A acute aortic dissection.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients underwent total aortic arch replacement using the frozen elephant trunk technique, deploying the J Graft FROZENIX into zone 1 or 2 (zone 1: n = 17, zone 2: n = 33) in combination with the Gelweave Lupiae graft for acute Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. Patient characteristics, intraoperative data, and early and midterm outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4% (2 patients). The in-hospital mortality rate in patients with visceral malperfusion was 11% (1/9). There were no patients with paraplegia and stent graft-induced new entry. Resection or closure of the most proximal entry tear was achieved in 100% of 42 patients who had postoperative computed tomography. The overall survival was 87.9%, 84.1%, and 84.1% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. However, 1 patient required endovascular extension for the dilatation of the descending thoracic aorta 4 months after the initial surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Total aortic arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique (zone 1-2) and Gelweave Lupiae graft was safe and effective in simplifying surgery for acute Stanford type A acute aortic dissection.

Current status of open surgery for acute type A aortic dissection in Japan

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to report the clinical outcomes of open surgery for acute aortic dissection by using the Japan Cardiovascular Database.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2018, a total of 29,486 patients with acute aortic dissection who underwent open surgery were registered in the Japan Cardiovascular Database. Some 50% of patients were male. Age of patients at surgery was 59.8 ± 14.2 years; 61% of patients were aged less than 65 years, and 21% of patients were aged more than 75 years. Connective tissue disease was found in 1.2% of patients. Some 13% of patients had disturbed consciousness, and 12% of patients had cardiogenic shock. Some 11% of patients had moderate or severe aortic valve regurgitation, and 2.3% of patients had acute myocardial infarction. Some 94% of patients underwent surgery within 24 hours after diagnosis. Antegrade cerebral perfusion was used in 74% of patients, hypothermic circulatory arrest with retrograde cerebral perfusion was used in 17.1% of patients, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was used in 9.4% of patients. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 216 ± 90 minutes, and cardiac ischemic time was 132 ± 60 minutes. Lowest body temperature was 24.6°C ± 3.2°C. Replacement of the ascending aorta (zone I) was performed in 69% of patients, and total arch replacement (zone 0 to zone II, III-) was performed in 29% of patients. The aortic valve was replaced in 7.9% of patients and repaired in 4.4% of patients.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality was 9.2%, and in-hospital mortality was 11%. The number of operations has increased through the study periods. The in-hospital mortality has been stable or in a decreasing trend. Major complications consisted of stroke in 12% of patients, new hemodialysis in 7.3% of patients, spinal cord ischemia in 3.9% of patients, and prolonged ventilation in 15% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 30,000 patients with acute aortic dissection in the recent 6 years (2013 - 2018) underwent open surgery according to the nationwide Japanese database. The number of operations has increased, and in-hospital mortality has been stable or in a decreasing trend. Although the early outcomes are acceptable, there is still room for improvement in patients with preoperative comorbidities.

Modified total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique for a right-sided aortic arch and aortic diverticulum in a teenager

BACKGROUND

A right sided aortic arch (RAA) and an aortic diverticulum (AD) are a rare congenital anomaly associated with an aortic rupture and dissection. Recently, various methods for the surgical management have been described to treat RAAs and ADs.

CASE REPORT

We describe a case of an RAA with a mirror image branching (RAMI) and AD in a teenager who complained of chest pain. We planned a total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique. Further, we needed to devise a way to reconnect the cerebral vessels because of his small arch anatomy and limited space in the mediastinum. We performed a right subclavian artery debranching, creating an anastomosis using one graft and diamond anastomosis, and performed the left innominate and right carotid anastomosis in an island fashion. This surgical approach could be a treatment option for young or small patients with RAMIs and ADs, whose arch anatomy is very small.

Pseudoaneurysm after total arch replacement mimicking malignant lymphadenopathy

Pseudoaneurysm should be considered in the differential diagnosis when the computed tomography (CT) findings show a mediastinal mass in patients with a history of cardiovascular surgery even if such surgery occurred over two decades previously.

Time of day does not influence outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection: Results from the IRAD

BACKGROUND

Type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) represents a surgical emergency requiring intervention regardless of time of day. Whether such a "evening effect" exists regarding outcomes for TAAAD has not been previously studied using a large registry data.

METHODS

Patients with TAAAD were identified from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissections (1996-2019). Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing operative repair during the daytime (D), defined as 8 am-5 pm, versus the evening (N), defined as 5 pm-8 am.

RESULTS

Four thousand one-hundrd and ninety-seven surgically treated patients with TAAAD were identified, with 1824 patients undergoing daytime surgery (43.5%) and 2373 patients undergoing evening surgery (56.5%). Daytime patients were more likely to have undergone prior cardiac surgery (13.2% vs. 9.5%; p < .001) and have had a prior aortic dissection (4.8% vs. 3.4%; p = .04). Evening patients were more likely to have been transferred from a referring hospital (70.8% vs. 75.0%; p = .003). Daytime patients were more likely to undergo aortic valve sparing root procedures (23.3% vs. 19.2%; p = .035); however, total arch replacement was performed with equal frequency (19.4% vs. 18.8%; p = .751). In-hospital mortality (D: 17.3% vs. N. 16.2%; p = .325) was similar between both groups. Subgroup analysis examining the effect of weekend presentation revealed no significant mortality difference.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of TAAAD patients underwent surgical repair at night. There were higher rates of postoperative tamponade in evening patients; however, mortality was similar. The expertise of cardiac-dedicated operative and critical care teams regardless of time of day as well as training paradigms may explain similar mortality outcomes in this high risk population.

Quantifying the learning curve of emergent total arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection

Background

Acute type A aortic dissection with arch involvement is a life-threatening condition, which requires immediate surgical attention. Emergent total arch replacement and root reconstruction is a technically demanding operation with varying outcomes based on surgeon experience. The human factors in total arch replacement in the emergent setting have never been systematically investigated. The ability of surgeons with low volumes to achieve acceptable results in their start-up period is not known.

Methods

From January 2013 to December 2016, patients with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent emergent total arch replacement with three surgeons were enrolled. Basic characteristics, procedural and postoperative outcomes were collected. The time of critical surgical steps and operative mortality were calculated using descriptive statistics and cumulative SUM (CUSUM) analysis.

Results

A total of 300 patients (age 53.8±11.5 years, female 63, 21.0%) with acute type A aortic dissection underwent emergent total arch replacement. A total of 219 patients (73.0%) had root reinforcement, 295 patients (98.3%) underwent frozen elephant trunk repair. Mean circulatory arrest and cross-clamp times were 29.8±9.8 and 112.3±32.1 min, respectively. The operative mortality was 6.7%, the stroke rate was 4.0%. The mean length of postoperative ICU and hospital stays were 8.4±10.6 and 18.0±12.2 days, respectively. By CUSUM depictions, surgeons appeared to have different learning curves with regards to operative time. By CUSUM failure analysis on operative mortality, two newly appointed surgeons in their start-up period stayed in an acceptable range, while one senior surgeon with higher volumes experienced superior outcomes and better performance.

Conclusions

Although emergent total arch replacement for acute type A dissection is a complex scenario, surgeons well-trained in adult cardiac surgery are able to achieve acceptable results in their start-up period.

Renal protective effect of the aortic balloon occlusion technique in total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk

Background

Organ dysfunction caused by hypothermic circulatory arrest continues to concern surgeons. The aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) technique can significantly shorten the circulatory arrest time in total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (TAR with FET). This study aims to analyze the renal protective effect of the ABO technique and to analyze the predictors of acute kidney injury (AKI) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) after TAR with FET.

Methods

Between August 2017 and September 2018, 247 patients who underwent TAR with FET were divided into ABO and moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) groups. The primary endpoint was postoperative AKI defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to identify the predictors of AKI and CRRT after TAR with FET.

Results

With the application of the ABO technique, the circulatory arrest time was significantly shortened (ABO 4, IQR: 3-6 vs. MHCA 18, IQR: 16-20, P<0.001). Meanwhile, surgeons safely set the lowest nasopharyngeal temperature at a higher grade (ABO 28.1, IQR: 27.4-28.5 vs. MHCA 24.7, IQR: 24.1-25.1, P<0.001). The peak serum creatinine (SCr) values within 48 hours after the surgery was lower in the ABO group than in the MHCA group (ABO 124, IQR: 97-173 vs. MHCA 146, IQR: 108-221, P=0.008). The distribution of AKI grade according to the KDIGO criteria differed between the two groups (P=0.04): more patients in the ABO group were free from AKI (Grade 0) than patients in the MHCA group (33% vs. 23.1%), and the proportion of patients with high-grade AKI (Grades 2 and 3) in the ABO group was lower than that in the MHCA group (21% vs. 32%). The ABO technique was associated with reduced potential for AKI, but was not protective for CRRT.

Conclusions

The ABO technique significantly shortened the circulatory arrest time and safely elevated temperature, and provided better renal protection in patients undergoing TAR with FET. The ABO technique did not reverse the need for CRRT, nor did it reduce mortality or major adverse events.