Factors leading to satisfaction with counseling for Labor after Cesarean among Latina women in the United States

BACKGROUND

Cesarean birth, especially repeat cesarean, is associated with significantly higher morbidity than vaginal birth. Appropriately counseling women who are candidates for labor after cesarean (LAC) has the potential to confer significant health benefits for women. Little guidance exists about optimal counseling techniques, especially for Latina women. The aim of this study was to evaluate satisfaction among Latinas about how LAC counseling is performed, specifically as it relates to shared decision making.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study of pregnant women at several clinics in a Federally Qualified Health Center system in Utah. We interviewed eleven Latina women about satisfaction with recent LAC counseling with a specific aim of obtaining rich, personal narratives rather than reaching data saturation. A codebook representing the most common themes was developed.

RESULTS

Three major themes emerged related to LAC counseling including influences on satisfaction, influences on the birth decision process, and preferences surrounding method and timing of counseling. Women experienced greater satisfaction from providers who used jargon-free communication, were perceived as trustworthy, cared about her experiences, and empowered her to make an informed decision. Women's decisions were influenced by prior birth experiences, desire for a safe delivery and easy recovery, and future family planning.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the aspects of LAC counseling that are most meaningful for Latina women can promote effective communication between patient and provider and improve patient satisfaction. Globally, our findings highlight the importance of evaluating the experiences and preferences of minority groups; majority populations cannot be assumed to speak for minority populations.

Predictors of successful vaginal birth after cesarean without an epidural among women with no prior vaginal delivery

BACKGROUND

Data are scarce on predictors for success of labor after cesarean (LAC) among women delivering without epidural anesthesia (EA). We aimed to study the predictors for success of LAC among women with no prior vaginal delivery that did not use EA.

METHODS

A retrospective study including all women undergoing LAC between 3/2011 and 1/2021 with no prior vaginal delivery that did not use EA. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean were examined using multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 466 no EA LAC, 339 (72.7%) delivered vaginally. Women in the successful LAC group had lower pregestational and predelivery BMI as compared to those who had a repeat cesarean [odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 (0.85-0.94), P < 0.001, and 0.89 (0.85-0.93), P < 0.001, respectively]. The rate of labor dystocia in previous cesarean was lower in the LAC success group [92 (27.1%) vs 50 (39.4%), OR 95% CI 0.57 (0.37-0.88)]. Mean gestational age at LAC was lower in the LAC success group (38^5/7  ± 2^5/7 vs 39^5/7  ± 1^5/7 , P = 0.014). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the following factors were negatively and independently associated with LAC success: higher predelivery BMI [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 95% CI 0.90 (0.86-0.95)], higher gestational age at previous cesarean and at LAC [aOR 95% CI 0.81 (0.70-0.93) and 0.97 (0.94-0.98), respectively], induction of labor [aOR 95% CI 0.08 (0.03-0.25)], and duration of ruptured membranes [aOR 95% CI 0.97 (0.96-0.99)].

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified that lower BMI, lower gestational age, shorter ruptured membranes duration, and spontaneous labor are associated with successful LAC among nonusers of EA with no prior vaginal delivery at one tertiary care facility in Israel.

Maternal and perinatal outcome of induction at 39 weeks versus expectant management in labor after cesarean section

OBJECTIVE

To study induction of labor (IOL) at 39 weeks compared with expectant management among women undergoing labor after cesarean section (LAC) with no prior vaginal delivery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including all women undergoing LAC with no prior vaginal delivery, between March 2011 and January 2021. We allocated the study cohort into two groups: IOL at 39^0/7 to 39^6/7 and all LACs at ≥40^0/7 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcome. The secondary outcome was a composite of adverse maternal outcome.

RESULTS

Overall, 1022 women met inclusion criteria, of whom 89 (8.7%) had IOL at 39^0/7 -39^6/7 weeks and 933 (91.3%) had LAC at ≥40^0/7 weeks. The composite neonatal outcome rate was comparable between groups (0.186). There were three uterine ruptures (3.4%) in the IOL group and 11 (1.2%) in the LAC at ≥40 weeks group (P = 0.115). The rate of the composite maternal outcomes occurrence was higher in the IOL group (18.0% vs. 10.1%, P = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

IOL at 39 weeks among women undergoing LAC with no prior vaginal delivery is not associated with improved neonatal outcomes when compared with expectant management but may be associated with a higher rate of adverse maternal outcomes.

Evaluation of the usefulness of ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment before delivery of women with a prior cesarean delivery: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The main reason to avoid trial of labor after cesarean delivery is the possibility of uterine rupture. Identifying women at risk is thus an important aim, for it would enable women at low risk to proceed with a secure planned vaginal birth.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of proposing mode of delivery based on the ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness on a composite outcome of maternal-fetal mortality and morbidity, compared with usual management, among pregnant women with a previous cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This multicenter, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, unmasked trial was conducted at 8 referral university hospitals with a neonatal intensive care unit and enrolled 2948 women at 36 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days of gestation with 1 previous low transverse cesarean delivery and no contraindication to trial of labor. Women in the study group had their lower uterine segment thickness measured by ultrasound. Those with measurements >3.5 mm, were encouraged to choose a planned vaginal delivery, and those with measurements ≤3.5 mm, were encouraged to choose a planned repeat cesarean delivery. This measurement was not taken in the control group; their mode of delivery was decided according to standard management. The primary outcome was a composite criterion comprising maternal mortality, uterine rupture, uterine dehiscence, hysterectomy, thromboembolic disease, transfusion, endometritis, perinatal death, or neonatal encephalopathy. Prespecified secondary outcomes were repeat cesarean deliveries, elective or after trial of labor.

RESULTS

The study group included 1472 women, and the control group included 1476 women. These groups were similar at baseline. The primary outcome occurred in 3.4% of the study group and 4.3% of the control group (relative risk, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.13: risk difference, -1.0%; 95% confidence interval, -2.4 to 0.5). The uterine rupture rate in the study group was 0.4% and in the control group 0.9% (relative risk, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-1.19). The planned cesarean delivery rate was 16.4% in the study group and 13.7% in the control group (relative risk, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.47), whereas the rates of cesarean delivery during labor were 25.1% and 25.0% (relative risk, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.14) in the study and control groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound measurements of lower uterine segment thickness did not result in a statistically significant lower frequency of maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes than standard management. However, because this study was underpowered, further research should be encouraged.

Spontaneous labor patterns among women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated spontaneous labor patterns among women achieving a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), without a previous vaginal delivery in relation to nulliparous women.

METHODS

This historical cohort study included 422 women attempting VBAC and 150 nulliparas. We examined time intervals for each centimeter of cervical dilation and compared labor progression in 321 women who achieved spontaneous VBAC and 147 nulliparous women achieving a spontaneous vaginal delivery. Epidural anesthesia use, delivery mode, cord arterial pH and 5-minute Apgar score were also compared.

FINDINGS

Women in the VBAC group compared to nulliparous women had similar durations of first (4-10 cm: 4:22 (00:54-13:10) h vs. 4:47 (1:10-15:10) h, p = .61), second (1:07 (8:00-3:21), vs. 1:34 (10:00-3:40), p = .124) and third stages of labor (10:00 (2:00-22:00) vs. 08:00 (3:24-22:12), p = .788). When comparing women who had epidural analgesia to those who did not, no differences were found between the groups regarding durations of first and second stages of labor. Interestingly, among parturients without epidural anesthesia only, the VBAC group had shorter second stage compared to the nulliparous (00:19 (0:04-1:59) vs. 00:47 (0:08-2:09), p = .023).

CONCLUSION

Labor patterns among women achieving spontaneous VBAC are similar to those of nulliparous women with spontaneous vaginal deliveries.

Nationwide implementation of a decision aid on vaginal birth after cesarean: a before and after cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Woman with a history of a previous cesarean section (CS) can choose between an elective repeat CS (ERCS) and a trial of labor (TOL), which can end in a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or an unplanned CS. Guidelines describe women's rights to make an informed decision between an ERCS or a TOL. However, the rates of TOL and vaginal birth after CS varies greatly between and within countries. The objective of this study is to asses nation-wide implementation of counselling with a decision aid (DA) including a prediction model, on intended delivery compared to care as usual. We hypothesize that this may result in a reduction in practice variation without an increase in cesarean rates or complications.

METHODS

In a multicenter controlled before and after cohort study we evaluate the effect of nation-wide implementation of a DA. Practice variation was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of TOL percentages.

RESULTS

A total of 27 hospitals and 1,364 women were included. A significant decrease was found in practice variation (SD TOL rates: 0.17 control group vs. 0.10 intervention group following decision aid implementation, p=0.011). There was no significant difference in the ERCS rate or overall CS rates. A 21% reduction in the combined maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Nationwide implementation of the DA showed a significant reduction in practice variation without an increase in the rate of cesarean section or complications, suggesting an improvement in equality of care.

Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC): fear it or dare it? An evaluation of potential risk factors

OBJECTIVES

The consultation of women aspiring a vaginal birth after caesarean may be improved by integrating the individual evaluation of factors that predict their chance of success. Retrospective analysis of correlating factors for all trials of labor after caesarean that were conducted at the Department of Obstetrics of Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Clinic from 2014 to October 2017.

METHODS

Of 2,151 pregnant women with previous caesarean, 408 (19%) attempted a vaginal birth after cesarean. A total of 348 women could be included in the evaluation of factors, 60 pregnant women were excluded because they had obstetric factors (for example preterm birth, intrauterine fetal death) that required a different management.

RESULTS

Spontaneous delivery occurred in 180 (51.7%) women and 64 (18.4%) had a vacuum extraction. 104 (29.9%) of the women had a repeated caesarean delivery. The three groups showed significant differences in body mass index, the number of prior vaginal deliveries and the child's birth weight at cesarean section. The indication for the previous cesarean section also represents a significant influencing factor. Other factors such as maternal age, gestational age, sex, birth weight and the head circumference of the child at trial of labor after caesarean showed no significant influence.

CONCLUSIONS

The clear majority (70.1%) of trials of labor after caesarean resulted in vaginal delivery. High body mass index, no previous spontaneous delivery, and fetal distress as a cesarean indication correlated negatively with a successful vaginal birth after cesarean. These factors should be used for the consultation of pregnant women.

Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean for labor dystocia by sonographic estimated fetal weight

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the association of the weight difference between the index trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) sonographic estimated fetal weight (sEFW) and prior delivery birth weight with TOLAC success rate among women with previous labor dystocia and no prior vaginal delivery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including all women with prior cesarean for labor dystocia and no prior vaginal delivery undergoing TOLAC during between March 2011 and June 2020 with a sEFW within 1 week from delivery.

RESULTS

Overall, 168 women were included, of those 107 (63.7%) successfully delivered vaginally. The mean sEFW and mean birth weight were lower in the TOLAC success group (P = 0.010 and P = 0.013, respectively). The rate of higher sEFW in the current delivery compared with the previous delivery did not differ between study groups. The rate of higher TOLAC birth weight was lower in the TOLAC success group (odds ratio 0.30; 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.58). In multivariable regression analysis, maternal age older than 30 years, induction of labor, and higher birth weight were independently negatively associated with TOLAC success (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.27 [0.10-0.70], 0.27 [0.08-0.90], and 0.43 [0.19-0.94]; P = 0.008, P = 0.034, and P = 0.035, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

sEFW characteristics did not predict the success or failure of TOLAC among women with prior labor dystocia and no previous vaginal delivery.

Perinatal outcomes of planned home birth after cesarean and planned hospital vaginal birth after cesarean at term gestation in British Columbia, Canada: A retrospective population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective population-based cohort study was to determine whether the mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes differ between planned home VBAC (HBAC) and planned hospital VBAC.

METHODS

All midwifery clients with at least one prior cesarean birth delivered between April 2000 and March 2017 (N = 4741; n = 4180 planned hospital VBAC, n = 561 planned HBAC) were included. Multivariate binomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to calculate the odds ratios adjusted for the potential covariates. The primary outcome was the mode of delivery, and the secondary outcomes were uterine rupture/dehiscence, postpartum hemorrhage, nonintact perineum, episiotomy, obstetric trauma, Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, neonatal resuscitation requiring positive pressure ventilation, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and a composite outcome of severe neonatal mortality and morbidity and maternal mortality and morbidity.

RESULTS

Planned HBAC was associated with a significant 39% decrease in the odds of having a cesarean birth (aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.47-0.79) adjusting for the prepregnancy and pregnancy characteristics. Severe adverse outcomes were relatively rare in both settings; thus, our study did not have sufficient power to detect the true differences associated with the place of birth.

CONCLUSIONS

Home births for those eligible for VBACs and attended by registered midwives within an integrated health system were associated with higher vaginal birth rates compared with planned hospital VBACs. Severe adverse outcomes were relatively rare in both settings.

A Decade of Wishes-Changes in Maternal Preference of the Mode of Delivery among Polish Women over the Last Decade

Background and Objectives: The maternal preference of mode of delivery is an important problem in respect of patient's autonomy and shared decision-making. The objective of the study was to obtain information about women's preferences of the mode of delivery and knowledge about the cesarean section and its' consequences. Materials and Methods: The study was based on a survey filled in by 1175 women in 2010 and 1033 women in 2020. Respondents were asked about their preference of mode of delivery, possible factors influencing their decision and their knowledge about risks and benefits of cesarean section. Results: There was a significant increase in the rate of women who declared cesarean section as their preferred mode of delivery, from 43.97% in 2010 to 56.03% in 2020 (p < 0.05). In 2010 26.51% of women thought that choice of mode of delivery should be their autonomic decision, 46.36% preferred decision-sharing with their obstetrician, 25.64% thought that cesarean section should be performed for medical indications only (respectively 34.86%, 44.45% and 19.38% in 2020). Conclusions: There has been a significant increase in the rate of Polish women who prefer cesarean delivery over the last decade, as well as in the rate of women who consider the mode of delivery as their autonomic decision.

A survey of health care practitioners' attitudes toward shared decision-making for choice of next birth after cesarean

BACKGROUND

Patients with a history of cesarean may benefit from shared decision-making (SDM) interventions, such as patient decision aids, that provide individualized clinical information and help to clarify personal preferences. We sought to understand the factors that influence how care practitioners support choices for mode of birth and what individual and health system factors influence uptake of SDM in routine care.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of health care practitioners in British Columbia, Canada (2016-2017). Participants included family physicians, midwives, obstetricians, and registered nurses. We conducted descriptive and inferential analyses of quantitative data and subjected the open-ended survey responses to thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Analysis of survey responses (n = 307) suggested there was no significant association between the size of the participant hospital and their medico-legal concerns about mode of birth. Environmental factors that may influence the use of SDM included the length of time it takes to initiate an emergency cesarean and the timing of when the SDM intervention is introduced to the patient. No participants reported protocols prohibiting VBAC at their hospital. Participants preferred an SDM approach where the pregnant person is involved in making the final decision for mode of birth.

CONCLUSIONS

Although maternity care practitioners express attitudes and behaviors that may support SDM for mode of birth after cesarean, implementing SDM using a patient decision aid alone may be challenging because of environmental factors. Our study demonstrates how survey data can aid in identifying how, when, where, for whom, and why an SDM intervention could be implemented.

Neonatal and maternal outcomes with trial of labor after two prior cesarean births: stratified by history of vaginal birth

INTRODUCTION

To determine the impact of prior vaginal birth on neonatal and maternal outcomes among individuals undergoing a trial of labor after two cesarean births.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study using the U.S. National Vital Statistics 2014-2018 period linked birth and infant death data. Inclusion criteria were term, cephalic, singleton pregnancies with two prior cesarean births. The primary exposure variable was a trial of labor after cesarean vs prelabor repeat cesarean birth. Cohorts were defined by the presence or absence of a prior vaginal birth. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes (Apgar score <5 at 5 min, assisted ventilation >6 h, neonatal seizures, or neonatal death within 27 days). Secondary outcomes included a maternal composite and the cesarean birth rate. Propensity score matching was used to account for baseline differences in treatment allocation within each cohort, and conditional logistic regression assessed the association between the exposure and outcomes.

RESULTS

The composite neonatal adverse outcome was significantly higher in those undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean compared to prelabor repeat cesarean birth in both individuals without a prior vaginal birth (8.2 vs 11.6 per 1000 live births, OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.12-1.70) and with a prior vaginal birth (9.6 vs 12.4 per 1000 live births, OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.08-1.57). The composite maternal adverse outcome was significantly higher among individuals without a prior vaginal birth undergoing trial of labor after cesarean (6.0 vs 9.5 per 1000 live births, OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.26-2.09), but was similar in those with a prior vaginal birth (7.9 vs 9.3 per 1000 live births, OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.97-1.46).

CONCLUSION

In individuals with two prior cesarean births, trial of labor after cesarean was associated with increased neonatal adverse outcomes when compared to prelabor repeat cesarean birth, irrespective of a history of vaginal birth. In individuals with a prior vaginal birth, the composite maternal adverse outcome was not elevated in the trial of labor cohort.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Socioeconomic Status and Medical Correlates of Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean

Objectives: Black and Latinx women have higher rates of trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) compared with White women, but lower rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). This study examined potential racial/ethnic differences in correlates of TOLAC and VBAC. Materials and Methods: The analytic sample includes term, singleton hospital births to women with one prior cesarean in birth certificate data for 2016. We estimated associations between medical factors (diabetes, hypertension, and prepregnancy obesity) and socioeconomic status (education level and insurance type) and TOLAC and VBAC using logistic regression, stratifying by race/ethnicity and testing whether coefficients differed across models. Results: Hypertension and obesity were more strongly related to reduced chances of TOLAC among White women than among women of color. For example, having a body mass index (BMI) between 30 and 39 (vs. normal BMI) was associated with a 6.3 percentage-point (pp) lower probability of TOLAC for White women, a 5.9 pp lower probability for Black women, and 2.9 pp lower probability for Latinx women. Paying out-of-pocket for birth was associated with a 5.5 pp increase in the probability of TOLAC among White women, versus a 3.2 pp decrease among Black women. Overweight and obesity were associated with lower probability of VBAC, but the magnitude of this association was smaller for Black and Latinx women than for White women. Conclusions: More research is needed to elucidate the underlying decision-making processes that lead to these associations. Future work should focus on ensuring equity in access to VBAC-supportive providers and hospitals and fostering informed decision-making after a prior cesarean.

Comparison of maternal-neonatal results of vaginal birth after cesarean and elective repeat cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate maternal-neonatal results in women who underwent vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and elec-tive repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a two-year retrospective cohort analysis, 423 patients with a history of prior cesarean section, singleton pregnancy with cephalic presentation and gestational age of 37-41 weeks were investigated. The maternal and perinatal outcomes of 195 patients desiring VBAC and undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) attempt and 228 patients undergoing an ERCD were compared.

RESULTS

While the TOLAC attempt was successful in 141 patients (72.3%), it was unsuccessful in 54 patients. No statistically significant difference was determined between VBAC and ERCD patients regarding uterine rupture, dehiscence, post-partum hemorrhage, the need for a blood transfusion and wound site infection (p > 0.05). When the post-partum neonatal outcomes were compared, there was no statistically significant difference between VBAC and ERCD groups regarding the prevalence of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), respiratory distress, sepsis and birth injury (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The maternal and perinatal outcomes of our study may be encouraging in favor of VBAC particularly in countries with higher cesarean rates. We think that the option of VBAC should be offered more frequently for selected appropriate patients in created safe environments.

Labour Management in Trial of Labour After Cesarean Delivery (TOLAC): A Gap Analysis and Quality Improvement Initiative

OBJECTIVE

This quality improvement (QI) initiative was designed to identify gaps between evidence-based or hospital recommendations for trial of labour after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) labour management and clinical practice.

METHODS

Viable, singleton pregnancies from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018, undergoing TOLAC were extracted from the electronic medical record. Sixty randomly selected charts were reviewed for (1) consent, (2) induction methods, (3) oxytocin use, (4) continuous fetal monitoring, (5) admission indication, (6) examination regularity, (7) duration of dystocia before decision to perform cesarean delivery (CD), and (8) maternal complications.

RESULTS

The institutional vaginal birth after cesarean rate was 71%. Documented consent to TOLAC on admission was present in 50% of cases. Oxytocin augmentation was used in 38% of cases, and the median maximum dose was 4 mU/min (interquartile range [IQR] 3-7.5 mU/min). Delays in initiating oxytocin were identified in 47% of those patients. Decisions to deliver by cesarean were made after a median time of 5 hours and 40 minutes (IQR 3 hours and 30 minutes to 6 hours and 35 minutes) of failure to progress despite adequate contractions. After this decision, median time to delivery was 1 hour and 11 minutes (IQR 57 minutes to 2 hours and 16 minutes). Complications included postpartum hemorrhage (5%) and chorioamnionitis (6.7%). Surgical injury occurred in 10% of intrapartum CD. Peripartum complications were associated with delay in oxytocin implementation (χ² (1) = 9.80; P < 0.001) in secondary analysis.

CONCLUSION

Areas for QI were identified in (1) consent, (2) duration of dystocia before decision to proceed with CD and delay to CD, and (3) peripartum complications. We recognize the potential use of this as a tool to identify areas for QI and prospective study.

Morbidity associated with the use of Foley balloon for cervical ripening in women with prior cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the morbidity of Foley balloon for cervical ripening in comparison to oxytocin alone in women with a prior cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

A four-hospital retrospective review of all women with viable singleton pregnancies and history of a single prior cesarean delivery presenting for cervical ripening between 1994 and 2015. Exposure groups were either Foley balloon or oxytocin, at the treating physician's discretion. The primary outcome was defined as maternal morbidity, evaluated by a composite that included hemorrhage, and/or uterine infection, and/or uterine rupture. We defined two secondary outcomes: neonatal morbidity, and vaginal delivery rate. Neonatal morbidity was evaluated by a composite that included five-minute APGAR score <7 and/or NICU admission. We adjusted results for potential confounding variables, including hospital site, maternal age and race, initial cervical dilation, and gestational age at delivery.

RESULTS

We identified 688 patients who received ripening, 276 by Foley balloon and 412 by oxytocin. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of maternal morbidity between groups: 38 (13.8%) in the Foley balloon group and 79 (19.2%) in the oxytocin group (aOR 1.43; 95% CI, 0.90-2.27). There was no significant difference in the secondary outcome of neonatal morbidity: 31 (11.3%) in the Foley balloon group and 51 (12.4%) in the oxytocin group (aOR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.57-1.80). The rate of vaginal delivery was significantly less in the Foley balloon group compared to the oxytocin group: 56.2% vs 64.1%, p = .037.

CONCLUSION

When cervical ripening with either Foley balloon or oxytocin was utilized at the physician's discretion in women with prior cesarean, there was no identified difference in maternal and neonatal morbidity, but the rate of successful vaginal delivery was lower.

Predicting vaginal birth after previous cesarean: Using machine-learning models and a population-based cohort in Sweden

Introduction

Predicting a woman’s probability of vaginal birth after cesarean could facilitate the antenatal decision‐making process. Having a previous vaginal birth strongly predicts vaginal birth after cesarean. Delivery outcome in women with only a cesarean delivery is more unpredictable. Therefore, to better predict vaginal birth in women with only one prior cesarean delivery and no vaginal deliveries would greatly benefit clinical practice and fill a key evidence gap in research. Our aim was to predict vaginal birth in women with one prior cesarean and no vaginal deliveries using machine‐learning methods, and compare with a US prediction model and its further developed model for a Swedish setting.

Material and methods

A population‐based cohort study with a cohort of 3116 women with only one prior birth, a cesarean, and a subsequent trial of labor during 2008‐2014 in the Stockholm‐Gotland region, Sweden. Three machine‐learning methods (conditional inference tree, conditional random forest and lasso binary regression) were used to predict vaginal birth after cesarean among women with one previous birth. Performance of the new models was compared with two existing models developed by Grobman et al (USA) and Fagerberg et al (Sweden). Our main outcome measures were area under the receiver‐operating curve (AUROC), overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of prediction of vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery.

Results

The AUROC ranged from 0.61 to 0.69 for all models, sensitivity was above 91% and specificity below 22%. The majority of women with an unplanned repeat cesarean had a predicted probability of vaginal birth after cesarean >60%.

Conclusions

Both classical regression models and machine‐learning models had a high sensitivity in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean in women without a previous vaginal delivery. The majority of women with an unplanned repeat cesarean delivery were predicted to succeed with a vaginal birth (ie specificity was low). Additional covariates combined with machine‐learning techniques did not outperform classical regression models in this study.

Temporal trends in the incidence of and associations between the risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries

BACKGROUND

Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries are an important complication of vaginal deliveries that may result in short- and long-term pelvic floor morbidity and a diminished quality of life in young, healthy women. The prevalence of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries ranges from 0.1% to 8.7%. Over recent years, there seems to be a trend of increasing occurrence of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries worldwide. It is unclear why the rates are rising. Previous studies have examined the effect of different risk factors on the prevalence of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. The change in the incidence of some risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries can partially explain the overall increase in obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. There is no previous study that explored the impact of the changes of individual risk factors over time on the risk for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of this study was to examine the temporal trends in the prevalence and odds ratio of the major risk factors known to be associated with obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in the period from 1988 to 2016.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study that included all women who underwent vaginal deliveries between 1988 and 2016 at a tertiary university medical center. The time intervals were divided into 4 periods (1988-1997, 1998-2007, 2008-2016, and the total time from 1988 to 2016) and the incidence of each risk factor was calculated for each time period. Correlation models and regression analysis were performed to examine the association between obstetrical anal sphincter injuries and the different risk factors over time. Furthermore, the trends in the odds ratios of the important risk factors over the time periods were evaluated using a multivariate regression analysis in which the primiparous women were separated from the multiparous women.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 295,668 vaginal deliveries. Of these, 591 women were diagnosed with obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (0.2%). The significant risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (P<.05) in the multivariable analysis were the following: primiparity, vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, vacuum extraction, and a birthweight of >4 kg. There was a significant (P<.05) increase in the incidence over the study period for the following risk factors: primiparity, vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, and vacuum extraction. No change was found in the incidence of the risk factor of a birthweight of >4 kg. In addition, we found a strengthening of the association between vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and macrosomia with obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, as opposed to a decline in the relative contribution of vacuum extraction to the overall risk for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Moreover, we found that obstetrical anal sphincter injuries among primiparous women increased 7-fold over the study period but was unchanged among multiparous women.

CONCLUSION

We have shown significant (P<.05) temporal trends in the incidence and odds ratio of some of the known risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. A better understanding of the changes in the incidence and specific contribution of important risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries may explain, in part, the worldwide increase in the prevalence of this important and detrimental complication of vaginal birth.

Revisiting the Care Pathway for Trial of Labour After Cesarean: The Decision-to-Delivery Interval Is Key

Centres providing maternity care and offering a trial of labour after cesarean must develop and use maternal educational and consent processes that emphasize choice and autonomy related to options for and decisions surrounding vaginal birth after cesarean and elective repeat cesarean delivery. These centres should have administrative systems and processes that take into account local resources for cesarean delivery services, including team-based complex maternity risk support and an urgency consensus on the fetal, maternal, and maternal-fetal indications for a surgical delivery to ensure an appropriate decision-to-delivery interval.

Risk of anal sphincter injury in trial of labor post cesarean section

INTRODUCTION

We wanted to evaluate whether secundiparas who achieved vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) were at an increased risk for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) compared to primiparas who delivered vaginally, with a stratification by the mode of delivery-spontaneous or operative vaginal delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women who delivered by vacuum-assisted delivery between March 2011 and June 2019. Primiparas delivering vaginally and secundiparas undergoing VBAC were compared. The cohort was further stratified into two categories: spontaneous vaginal delivery and operative vaginal delivery.

RESULTS

Overall, 23 822 primiparas who delivered vaginally and 1596 secundiparas who underwent VBAC were analyzed. Operative vaginal delivery was performed in 4561 deliveries. OASI rate did not differ between the VBAC and primipara groups (1.3% vs 1.8%, P = .142). A total of 20 857 women delivered by spontaneous vaginal delivery, among them 1180 (5.7%) women were secundiparas and 19 677 (94.3%) were primiparas. OASI rate was comparable between the secundiparas undergoing VBAC and primiparas delivering vaginally (17 [1.4%] vs 338 [1.7%], P = .436). A total of 4561 women delivered by operative vaginal delivery, among them 416 (9.1%) were secundiparas and 4145 (90.9%) were primiparas. The rate of operative vaginal deliveries was higher among the VBAC group compared with the primipara group (6.1% vs 17.4%, P < .001). However, women undergoing successful VBAC had lower rates of OASI compared with primiparas (3 [0.7%] vs 96 [2.3%]; odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.97, P = .032). After multivariate logistic regression including all statistically significant factors, OASI was not associated with VBAC in spontaneous or operative vaginal deliveries (adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.51-1.40 and 0.39, 95% CI 0.12-1.28, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Secundiparas undergoing VBAC were not at a higher risk of OASI when compared with primiparas delivering vaginally, either in spontaneous or operative vaginal deliveries. This information might aid when counseling women contemplating a trial of labor after cesarean--to address their concerns regarding the risks and benefits of VBAC.

Cesarean section one hundred years 1920-2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

In present-day obstetrics, cesarean delivery occurs in one in three women in the United States, and in up to four of five women in some regions of the world. The history of cesarean section extends well over four centuries. Up until the end of the nineteenth century, the operation was avoided because of its high mortality rate. In 1926, the Munro Kerr low transverse uterine incision was introduced and became the standard method for the next 50 years. Since the 1970's, newer surgical techniques gradually became the most commonly used method today because of intraoperative and postpartum benefits. Concurrently, despite attempts to encourage vaginal birth after previous cesareans, the cesarean delivery rate increased steadily from 5 to 30-32% over the last 10 years, with a parallel increase in costs as well as short- and long-term maternal, neonatal and childhood complications. Attempts to reduce the rate of cesarean deliveries have been largely unsuccessful because of the perceived safety of the operation, short-term postpartum benefits, the legal climate and maternal request in the absence of indications. In the United States, as the cesarean delivery rate has increased, maternal mortality and morbidity have also risen steadily over the last three decades, disproportionately impacting black women as compared to other races. Extensive data on the prenatal diagnosis and management of cesarean-related abnormal placentation have improved outcomes of affected women. Fewer data are available however for the improvement of outcomes of cesarean-related gynecological conditions. In this review, the authors address the challenges and opportunities to research, educate and change health effects associated with cesarean delivery for all women.

Outcomes of labor induction at 39 weeks in pregnancies with a prior cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of induction for those undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean section has not been established. The little data which supports the consideration of induction at 39 weeks gestation excludes those with a history of prior cesarean section.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risks and benefits of elective induction of labor (IOL) at 39 weeks compared with expectant management (EM) until 42 weeks in pregnancies complicated by one previous cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of singleton non-anomalous pregnancies in the United States between January 2015 and December 2017. Data was provided by the CDC National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Vital Statistics. Analyses included only pregnancies with a history of one previous cesarean delivery (CD). Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies electively induced at 39 weeks (IOL) were compared to pregnancies that were induced, augmented or underwent spontaneous labor between 40 and 42 weeks (EM). Unlabored cesarean deliveries were excluded. Outcomes of interest included: cesarean delivery, intra-amniotic infection, blood transfusion, adult intensive care unit (ICU) admission, uterine rupture, hysterectomy, 5-minute Apgar score ≤3, prolonged neonatal ventilation, neonatal ICU (NICU) admission, neonatal seizure, perinatal/neonatal death. Log-binomial regression analysis was performed to calculate the relative risk (RR) for each outcome of interest, adjusting for confounding variables.

RESULTS

There were 50,136 pregnancies included for analysis with 9,381 women in the IOL group. Compared with EM, IOL at 39 weeks decreased the risk of intra-amniotic infection (1.7% vs 3.0%, p < .001; aRR: 0.58, 95% CI: [0.49-0.68]), blood transfusion (0.3% vs. 0.5%, p = .03; aRR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.45-0.98]), and low 5-minute Apgar score (0.31% vs 0.47%, p = .031; aRR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.44-0.97]). Conversely, IOL increased the risk of cesarean delivery (49.0% vs 27.6%, p < .001; aRR: 1.72, 95% CI: [1.68-1.77]). Furthermore, in the EM group, 919 pregnancies developed preeclampsia and 42 progressed to eclampsia. There were no differences in other perinatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In pregnancies complicated by one previous cesarean delivery, elective induction of labor at 39 weeks reduced the risk of intra-amniotic infection, blood transfusion, and low 5-minute Apgar score while increased the risk of repeat cesarean delivery.

Counselling Patients for Trial of Labour after Cesarean (TOLAC) and Invasive Placentation: Are We Missing the Mark? The Importance of Local Data and Informed Choice

OBJECTIVE

Rates of cesarean delivery are increasing, and these procedures carry potential complications, like the risk of invasive placentation, which increases with each cesarean. A trial of labour after cesarean (TOLAC) is a viable option for patients; however, it has been associated with uterine rupture, a complication with maternal and fetal risks. To better counsel patients considering TOLAC, we aimed to determine local uterine rupture rates and maternal and neonatal outcomes with TOLAC and compare these with outcomes related to invasive placentation.

METHODS

A 4-year retrospective chart review was conducted at our tertiary centre of all patients with a history of a previous cesarean delivery. We assessed rates of TOLAC, vaginal delivery after cesarean (VBAC), and uterine rupture, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with invasive placentation. Cases of uterine rupture from 1988 to the present were also reviewed, and their outcomes were compared with those of invasive placentation.

RESULTS

Our uterine rupture rate was 0.44% and VBAC rate was 73.8%. We identified 8 cases of uterine rupture since 1988 and 67 invasive placentas during the 4-year chart review. Invasive placentation was associated with a significantly increased risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity, hysterectomy, maternal complications, and longer length of maternal hospital stay when compared with uterine rupture.

CONCLUSION

While uterine rupture remains a potential complication of TOLAC, it is rare with overall excellent maternal and neonatal outcomes. Invasive placentation, the risk of which increases with cesarean delivery, carries potentially higher complication rates than uterine rupture. Local complication data is important for individual sites offering TOLAC. The implications of invasive placentation cannot be overlooked when counselling patients considering TOLAC.

Late Presentation of Uterine Rupture Following Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery: A Case Report

Background  A trial of labor after cesarean delivery is associated with uterine rupture rates of 0.5 to 0.9%, which can have devastating neonatal and maternal consequences. While uterine rupture typically occurs during labor, it can clinically manifest after delivery. Case  A 23-year-old multiparous female presented in labor at term. Her obstetrical history was significant for a prior low transverse cesarean delivery. She had an uncomplicated labor course and spontaneous vaginal delivery. Immediately after delivery, she complained of severe right shoulder and left lower quadrant pain. Bedside ultrasound revealed a 10-cm, complex, adnexal mass adjacent to the uterus without free fluid. She was hemodynamically stable and appeared clinically well. On repeat ultrasound, the mass was unchanged; however, the patient now had free intraperitoneal fluid along the liver edge. Emergent laparotomy revealed a uterine rupture along her prior hysterotomy with extension into the right uterine artery. A 10-cm broad ligament hematoma ruptured posteriorly resulting in a 1-L hemoperitoneum. She received multiple blood products intraoperatively and recovered well postpartum. Conclusion  Delivery after trial of labor after cesarean delivery usually decreases acuity; however, these patients remain at risk for significant complications. Clinicians should continue to assess patients in the immediate postpartum period and proceed with surgical intervention if necessary.

Correlation of Obesity with External Cephalic Version Success among Women with One Previous Cesarean Delivery

Objective  Our aim was to assess the correlation of body mass index (BMI) with the success rate of external cephalic version (ECV) among women with one prior cesarean delivery. Study Design  A cross-sectional study of pregnant women with one previous cesarean delivery who underwent ECV. The relationship between BMI and success rate of ECV was assessed. Adverse outcomes were also compared between women with an ECV attempt, and women who had a repeat cesarean delivery. Data were extracted from the U.S. Natality Database from 2014 to 2017. Pearson's correlation coefficient was performed to assess the relationship between BMI and success rate of ECV. Results  There were 2,329 women with prior cesarean delivery underwent an ECV attempt. The success rate of ECV among the entire cohort was 68.3%. There was no correlation between BMI and success rate of ECV ( r  = 0.024, p  = 0.239). Risks of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar between the ECV attempt group and the repeat cesarean delivery group. Conclusion  There was no correlation of BMI with the rate of successful ECV among women with one prior cesarean delivery. Given the similar success rates of ECV and adverse outcomes, obese women with one prior cesarean delivery should be offered ECV.