The effect of nateglinide on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of acenocoumarol

OBJECTIVE

The potential for a drug interaction was investigated between nateglinide, an oral antidiabetic agent, and acenocoumarol, an oral anticoagulant, as these drugs are primarily metabolized via CYP2C9.

METHODS

A two-period, randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover study design was employed to evaluate the effect of nateglinide on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of acenocoumarol in 11 healthy male or female subjects. All subjects received either nateglinide 120 mg t.i.d. or placebo for 5 days in a crossover fashion and a single 10-mg dose of acenocoumarol on day 3. Plasma concentrations of R- and S-acenocoumarol and the anticoagulation parameters [prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio of PT (PTINR)] were determined for 72 h following acenocoumarol administration. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of acenocoumarol were determined by noncompartmental analysis.

RESULTS

The mean (coefficient of variation (CV%)) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t)) of R-acenocoumarol in the presence and absence of nateglinide was 4217 (23%) and 3831 (24%) ng.h/ml, respectively. The corresponding values for S-acenocoumarol were 397 (20%) and 382 (23%), respectively. The mean (CV%) C(max) of R-acenocoumarol in the presence and absence of nateglinide was 304 (16%) and 316 (16%), respectively and the corresponding values for S-acenocoumarol were 142 (36%) and 141 (34%), respectively. The 90% confidence intervals indicated that exposure parameters, AUC(0-t) and C(max), of both R- and S-acenocoumarol were within the acceptable limits of 0.8-1.25. The mean (CV%) of area under the concentration-time curve of PT (AUC(PT)) following acenocoumarol administration in the presence and absence of nateglinide was 1170 (10%) and 1136 (8%), respectively. The corresponding AUC(INR) values were 104 (13%) and 99 (10%), respectively. Nateglinide co-administration has no influence on the PT or PTINR of acenocoumarol (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Co-administration of nateglinide does not influence either the pharmacokinetics or the anticoagulant activity of R- and S-acenocoumarol in healthy subjects. This suggests that no dosage adjustments will be required when nateglinide and acenocoumarol are coadministered in clinical practice.

Capillary whole blood testing by a new portable monitor. Comparison with standard determination of the international normalized ratio

We evaluated a new portable monitor (AvoSure PT PRO, Menarini Diagnostics, Firenze, Italy) developed to test the prothrombin time in capillary blood and plasma by comparing it with the standard laboratory determination. We studied 62 patients receiving acenocoumarol therapy. The international normalized ratio (INR) in capillary blood was analyzed by 2 methods: AvoSure PT PRO and Thrombotrack Nycomed Analyzer (Axis-Shield, Dundee, Scotland). Parallel studies were performed in plasma samples by a reference method using the Behring Coagulation Timer (Behring Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany). Plasma samples also were tested with the AvoSure PT PRO. Correlation was good for INR values for capillary blood and plasma samples by AvoSure PT PRO and our reference method (R2 = 0.8596) and for capillary blood samples tested by the AvoSure PT PRO and Thrombotrack Nycomed Analyzer (R2 = 0.8875). The correlation for INR in capillary blood and plasma samples by AvoSure PT PRO was 0.6939 (P < .0004). Capillary blood determinations are rapid and effective for monitoring oral anticoagulation therapy and have a high correlation to plasma determinations. AvoSure PT PRO is accurate for controlling INR in plasma and capillary blood samples, may be used in outpatient clinics, and has advantages over previous portable monitors.

Low rate of bleeding and thrombotic complications of oral anticoagulant therapy independent of age in the real-practice of an anticoagulation clinic

Over past years, there has been a world-wide increase in oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT). This study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of OAT managing in a real-practice situation. Nine hundred and three consecutive unselected patients referred for the control of OAT to the Anticoagulation Clinic of the University of Florence were studied. The total follow-up period was 1679 patient-years. The rate of total, major and fatal bleeding events was 5.0, 1.1 and 0.06 per 100 patient-years, respectively. In patients with a target International Normalized Ratio (INR) > or = 3, a significantly higher rate of bleeding (P = 0.02) with respect to patients with a target INR < 3 was observed. The rate of all thrombotic events was 3.8 per 100 patient-years. The rate of major and fatal thrombotic events were 2.4 and 0.4 per 100 patient-years, respectively. At INR >/= 4.5 the rate of bleeding was significantly higher (P = 0.005) than at lower INR. At INR < 2 the rate of all thrombotic events was significantly higher (P = 0.00001) with respect to more elevated intensities of anticoagulation. A low incidence of complications may be obtained even in elderly outpatients on OAT followed at an anticoagulation clinic.

A placebo-controlled pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction study between tamsulosin and acenocoumarol

AIM

To evaluate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between tamsulosin and acenocoumarol.

METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers received tamsulosin 0.4 mg or placebo once daily for 9 days in a double-blind, cross-over study. On day 5 of each study period, a single 10-mg oral dose of racemic acenocoumarol was administered.

RESULTS

The ratios (point estimates (90% confidence intervals)) of values in the presence and absence of tamsulosin were: AUCPT 1.01 (0.98, 1.03); maximum prothrombin time (Ptmax) 0.99 (0.94, 1.05); AUC (R)-acenocoumarol 1.02 (0.90, 1.16), and AUC (S)-acenocoumarol 1.03 (0.89, 1.20). Both combinations, tamsulosin and placebo with acenocoumarol, were well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple doses of tamsulosin had no effect on the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of a single high dose of acenocoumarol.

[Acenocoumarol (Sintrom) and fluinidione (Previscan) in pediatrics after cardiac surgical procedures]

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1997 and 2001, 150 children (one month to 16 years of age) were treated with oral anticoagulants after cardiac surgery (Fontan's operations and congenital heart diseases without valvulopathy: 62%, valvular prosthesis: 20%, arrhythmia: 4.6%, thrombosis: 4%, other: 9.4%). They were first treated by either unfractionated heparin (49%) or nadroparin (51%), then by acenocoumarol (n1 = 114) or fluindione (n2 = 36) until steady state.

RESULTS

The retrospective analysis of data (age, body weight, international normalized ratio, loading and maintenance doses, time to achieve the steady state) led to the building of a dosage nomogram usable in pediatrics.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that the mean maintenance dose depended on age and weight. After three years, that dose (mg/kg) was getting close to adult values; it was higher before three years of age, especially before 12 months (p < 0.01), and very variable from a child to another. The recommended loading dose should be as close as possible to the effective maintenance dose: within that cohort, about 0.14 and 0.05 (acenocoumarol) or 1.1 and 0.40 mg kg-1 day-1 (fluindione), before 12 months and after three years respectively.

No effect of acenocoumarol therapy on levels of endothelial activation markers in sickle cell disease

Sickle cell patients are characterized by a chronic inflammatory and hypercoagulable state, depicted by elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, endothelial adhesion molecules, and elevated markers of thrombin generation. We set out to determine whether anticoagulation with a coumadin derivative reduces inflammation in sickle cell disease. Therefore, serum levels of NFkappaB-regulated endothelial adhesion molecule soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and serum levels of non-NFkappaB-dependent markers of endothelial activation (soluble cellular fibronectin and von Willebrand factor antigen) were compared during treatment with acenocoumarol (INR 1.6-2.0) and placebo. No effect on circulating levels of the measured parameters was observed during treatment with acenocoumarol as compared to placebo. In the targeted INR range, anticoagulation of sickle cell patients with acenocoumarol does not seem to reduce endothelial activation.

Effect of low-dose aspirin on the international normalized ratio variability in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses

An increased risk of bleeding is associated with a more intense oral anticoagulation, a greater international normalized ratio (INR) variability and the use of aspirin. We studied the INR variability of patients (n = 121) with modern heart valves who had been prospectively randomized to receive acenocoumarol at a targeted INR of 2.4-3.6 plus aspirin 100 mg/day or acenocoumarol alone at the same dosage, to evaluate whether aspirin influences variability and thus the risk of bleeding. Variability was similar in patients with no events regardless of the use of aspirin. A statistically significantly higher variability was observed in patients with bleeding events independently of the use of aspirin. Nevertheless, the concomitant use of aspirin in patients with a high variability should be monitored closely and thoroughly.

Differential effects of 2C9*3 and 2C9*2 variants of cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9 on sensitivity to acenocoumarol

The 2C9*3 and 2C9*2 polymorphisms of cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9 are associated with hypersensitivity to warfarin and bleeding. The effect of these polymorphisms on sensitivity to acenocoumarol is unknown. Three groups of patients, with low, medium, or high acenocoumarol-dose requirements, were studied. Age influenced the acenocoumarol sensitivity. Bearing the 2C9*3 allele was associated with the need for a lower acenocoumarol dose (odds ratio [OR], 6.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-24.18); 80% of carriers of the 2C9*3 allele required a low dose. The 2C9*2 allele was associated with a lower acenocoumarol-dose requirement (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.11-6.58) because of a reduced risk of the need for a high acenocoumarol dose (4.8% of the patients in the high-dose group carried the 2C9*2 allele versus 34.1% and 30.2%, respectively, in the medium-dose and low-dose groups). Therefore, carriers of 2C9*3 may need a low initial loading dose of acenocoumarol. Because acenocoumarol sensitivity with the 2C9*2 variant does not seem to be clinically relevant, the drug could be an alternative to warfarin in 2C9*2 carriers.

Overanticoagulation associated with combined use of antifungal agents and coumarin anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

Several case reports have associated combined use of coumarins and antifungal agents with overanticoagulation. However, we are not aware of epidemiologic studies that quantify the risk of overanticoagulation caused by antifungal agents. We conducted a follow-up study in a large population-based cohort to investigate the antifungal agents that are associated with overanticoagulation during therapy with coumarins.

METHODS

All patients in the Rotterdam Study who were treated with acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon in the study period from April 1, 1991, through Dec 31, 1998, and for whom international normalized ratio data were available were followed up until an INR > or =6.0, the end of their treatment, death, or the end of the study period. Proportional hazards regression analysis was used to estimate the risk of an INR > or =6.0 in relation to concomitant use of an oral anticoagulant and antifungal agents, after adjustment for several potentially confounding factors such as age, gender, hepatic dysfunction, malignancies, and heart failure.

RESULTS

Of the 1124 patients in the cohort, 351 had an INR > or =6.0. The incidence rate was 6.9 per 10,000 treatment days. Oral miconazole most strongly increased the risk of overanticoagulation with an adjusted relative risk of 36.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.4-108.0).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study among outpatients of an anticoagulant clinic who were on a regimen of coumarins, oral miconazole was especially strongly associated with overanticoagulation. Awareness of these drug interactions and more frequent monitoring of INR values during the initial stages of treatment with some antifungal drugs in patients taking coumarins may minimize the risk of bleeding complications. The concurrent use of miconazole and coumarins should be discouraged.

The effect of acenocoumarol on hemorheological parameters

The effect of acenocoumarol on hemorheological variables was measured in 35 non-valvular chronic atrial fibrillation patients before starting oral anticoagulant therapy (basal) and one and two months after beginning treatment (INR-2,3). Fibrinogen increased significantly from the basal situation: 332+/-99 mg/dl to 386+/-96 mg/dl in the second month (p<0.05). However, this small increase in fibrinogen is not large enough to mediate other rheological changes, and whole blood filterability, blood viscosity, plasma viscosity and erythrocyte deformability and aggregability remained unchanged after treatment. These results suggest that acenocoumarol does not affect rheological parameters and can therefore be used as a "neutral drug" for rheological studies in cardiovascular patients under oral anticoagulant therapy.

Assessment of patient capability to self-adjust oral anticoagulant dose: a multicenter study on home use of portable prothrombin time monitor (COAGUCHECK)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Self-testing and self-monitoring with portable prothrombin time (PT) monitors has been shown to be feasible and safe. However the ability of patients on chronic oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) to self-adjust their dose without specific training has never been properly evaluated. The aims of this study were to evaluate: 1) the ability of patients on chronic OAT to self-adjust their dose without specific training; 2) the integration of a portable PT monitor (Coagucheck, Roche Diagnostics, Germany) for home use into routine patient care in anticoagulation clinics.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A nested case-control study was conducted in four centers of the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics (FCSA). Patients (n=78) on stable OAT for at least 6 months (cases: 47 men, 31 women, age range: 18-75 years) were enrolled on a volunteer basis after passing an Abbreviated Mental Test and providing informed consent. After three instruction sessions on the use of Coaguchek, subjects performed the PT test at home, communicated the INR results to the Center and suggested the dose adjustment and date for next control as they thought appropriate. However, they were requested to follow the prescription made by the Center. Controls (78 subjects) matched by age (+/- 5 years), sex and therapeutic range with the cases, were selected from among those who attended the anticoagulation clinics and managed by usual care.

RESULTS

When compared with the dose prescribed by the Clinic, the dose suggested by warfarin and acenocoumarol users was equal to or within +/- 6% of the mean weekly dose in 80% and 82% of suggestions, respectively. Time spent in the therapeutic range during the study was the same (80%) for cases and controls.

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS

Selected patients on chronic anticoagulant therapy can acquire a satisfactory ability for self-adjustment of OAT dose without specific training.

Prediction of pharmacokinetic drug/drug interactions from In vitro data: interactions of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug lornoxicam with oral anticoagulants

CYP2C9 is involved in the metabolism of the oral anticoagulants warfarin, phenprocoumon, and acenocoumarol. It is also responsible for the 5'-hydroxylation of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug lornoxicam. Therefore, lornoxicam and the oral anticoagulants are potential inhibitors of their metabolism. Their inhibitory potency was investigated in microsomes from six human livers. An approach to predict pharmacokinetic interactions of lornoxicam from in vitro inhibition data was developed. Where possible, the forecasts were verified by comparison with data from clinical interaction studies. The following increases in steady-state plasma concentrations or areas under the plasma concentration-time curve of the oral anticoagulants by concomitant lornoxicam medication were predicted (values in parentheses are for healthy volunteers): (S)-warfarin, 1. 58-fold (1.32-fold for racemate); racemic-acenocoumarol, 1.28-fold (1.09-fold); (R)-acenocoumarol, 1.10-fold (1.0-fold); racemic-phenprocoumon, 1.11-fold (1.18-fold); and (S)-phenprocoumon, 1.13-fold (1.24-fold). Lornoxicam 5'-hydroxylation was competitively inhibited in vitro by both phenprocoumon (K(i) = 1.2 +/- 0.4 microM) and acenocoumarol (K(i) = 5.5 +/- 3.5 microM). The present results indicate that relatively close predictions of the interactions of lornoxicam with oral anticoagulants from in vitro data are possible under the assumption that hepatic lornoxicam concentrations are similar to its total plasma concentrations. The degree of pharmacokinetic interactions exhibited by oral anticoagulants and lornoxicam is dependent on the respective contribution of CYP2C9 to their total clearance.

Patients with acenocoumarol treatment and migraine

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to investigate the possible effect of acenocoumarol, which is indicated for nonneurological disease, on headache.

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that anticoagulation can have beneficial effects in the control of migraine attacks.

METHODS

Four hundred randomized patients on oral anticoagulant therapy were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their headaches.

RESULTS

Headache was present before or during oral anticoagulation in 166 (66 migraineurs and 100 nonmigraineurs) of 326 respondents. The major finding was that oral anticoagulation produced improvement in 63% of patients with migraine versus 38% of patients with nonmigranous headache. Improvement was related to the severity of migraine but not to age.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral anticoagulant therapy can improve migraine. The way in which anticoagulant therapy acts on migraine is unknown, but potential mechanisms include its effect on platelet aggregability and pharmacological effects such as suppression of enhanced nitric oxide.

A placebo-controlled study of interaction between nabumetone and acenocoumarol

AIMS

The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients treated with oral anticoagulants is generally discouraged due to the risk of interactions that could increase the risk of bleeding complications. Available data suggest the NSAID, nabumetone, does not produce such an interaction. We investigated whether nabumetone would interact with acenocoumarol, an oral anticoagulant widely used in some European countries.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted evaluating nabumetone (1-2 g daily for up to 4 weeks) in osteoarthritis patients with thromboembolic risk previously stabilized on acenocoumarol. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients whose International Normalized Ratio (INR) remained within established margins and whose acenocoumarol dose was not changed. Fifty-six patients were randomized to receive nabumetone (n=27) or placebo (n=29).

RESULTS

Eighteen patients in each group (67% for nabumetone and 62% for placebo) completed the study without showing INR or acenocoumarol dose changes, and were considered as study successes. Nine patients (33%) with nabumetone and 11 (38%) with placebo were considered study failures in the intention-to-treat analysis (one patient on nabumetone and four on placebo did not complete the study due to reasons not related to INR and acenocoumarol dose changes). No significant differences were found between groups with regard to study successes. There were two minor bleeding complications, one in each group. Six patients per group presented with eight adverse experiences in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with nabumetone did not alter INR levels compared with placebo in patients stabilized on oral acenocoumarol who require NSAID therapy. These results suggest that nabumetone does not produce a clinically relevant interaction with acenocoumarol. In orally anticoagulated patients without other associated risk factors, treatment with nabumetone for up to 4 weeks does not require increased monitoring of INR levels.

Miconazole oral gel enhances acenocoumarol anticoagulant activity: a report of three cases

OBJECTIVE

To describe three cases of interaction between miconazole oral gel and acenocoumarol, manifested as an increase in the international normalized ratio (INR).

CASE SUMMARIES

Three patients (62-year-old woman, 89-year-old woman, 43-year-old man) following oral antithrombotic treatment with acenocoumarol for different pathologies were diagnosed with oral candidiasis and started miconazole oral gel. In all cases, the previous INR values were repeatedly within the therapeutic range. The following routine monitoring of the antithrombotic therapy showed a marked increase in anticoagulant activity in all cases, which returned to the therapeutic range after miconazole was withdrawn. None of the patients needed substantial changes in their habitual dosages of acenocoumarol in subsequent measurements of the INR to stay within the therapeutic range.

DISCUSSION

We report three cases in which a possible interaction between miconazole oral gel and acenocoumarol is suggested by the chronological relationship between the introduction of miconazole and an increase in the INR. Miconazole exerts its fungistatic action by inhibiting some isoenzymes of the fungal cytochrome P450 system. Oral mucosa inflammation (as in oral candidiasis) may enhance its transmucosal absorption. In this setting, cytochrome P450 isoenzymes belonging to the host may be inhibited too. This mechanism provides an explanation for different interactions observed with miconazole oral gel.

CONCLUSIONS

Miconazole oral gel enhances acenocoumarol anticoagulant activity. Although we did not observe major bleeding complications, we suggest the use of other families of antifungal drugs, such as nystatin, to treat oral candidiasis in patients taking acenocoumarol.

No clinically relevant effect of lornoxicam intake on acenocoumarol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of lornoxicam co-administration on acenocoumarol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

METHODS

In an open crossover study, six healthy male volunteers received racemic acenocoumarol (10 mg) orally without/with lornoxicam co-administration (8 mg twice daily).

RESULTS

The median (range) areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for (R)-acenocoumarol were 3458 (3035-7312) microg x h 1(-1) in the absence of and 3667 (2907-7741) microg x h 1(-1) in the presence of lornoxicam. The corresponding values for (S)-acenocoumarol were 479 (381-853) microg x h 1(-1) and 612 (425-1241) microg x h 1(-1). The differences were not statistically significant. Lornoxicam co-administration did not influence the free fractions or acenocoumarol's effect on factor II and VII activities. Simulations based on the results of a model-based analysis predicted that in the case of lornoxicam co-administration, the factor VII activity of a person in steady-state at 26% will remain between 14% and 32%.

CONCLUSION

Co-administration of lornoxicam at the upper limit of recommended doses does not alter the pharmocokinetics of the clinically relevant (R)-acenocoumarol or the anticoagulant activity of acenocoumarol. These data clearly differ from the results of previous studies, which showed clinically relevant influences of lornoxicam on warfarin kinetics and of piroxicam on acenocoumarol kinetics.