Effects and distribution of the enamel matrix derivative Emdogain in the periodontal tissues of rat molars transplanted to the abdominal wall

The enamel matrix derivative Emdogain (EMD) has been found to promote regeneration of lost periodontal tissues. We have studied the effects and distribution of EMD in the periodontal tissues of maxillary rat molars transplanted to a subcutaneous position in the abdominal wall. The molars were transplanted with or without EMD either immediately after extraction or after drying for 30 min. After 2 days, 1, 2 or 4 weeks the rats were killed and the teeth were examined by means of light microscopy and immunohistochemistry with anti-amelogenin antibodies. Teeth transplanted immediately after extraction showed formation of alveolar bone separated from the dental roots by a periodontal space, regardless of the use of EMD. Among the teeth that were transplanted with EMD after drying for 30 min, new alveolar bone was formed in five out of eight teeth after 2 and 4 weeks. None of the teeth that were dried for 30 min and transplanted without EMD showed alveolar bone formation. Only one tooth transplanted with EMD showed root resorption after drying, while resorption was noted in all teeth transplanted without EMD. All teeth that were transplanted with EMD and none of the teeth that were transplanted without EMD showed an immunohistochemical reaction for amelogenin. After 2 days, amelogenin was precipitated on all surfaces exposed at the transplantation procedure. Later, the immunoreactive material was redistributed to cells at the root surface, where it was still demonstrable after 4 weeks. In conclusion, EMD is accumulated in cells at the root surface and promotes regeneration of the periodontal tissues of the transplanted teeth. It also seems to promote healing of root resorption.

A comparison of enamelin and amelogenin expression in developing mouse molars

Amelogenin and enamelin are structural proteins in the enamel matrix of developing teeth. The temporal and spatial patterns of enamelin expression in developing mouse molars have not been characterized, while controversy remains with respect to amelogenin expression by odontoblasts and cementoblasts. Here we report the results of in situ hybridization analyses of amelogenin and enamelin expression in mouse molars from postnatal days 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 14, and 21. Amelogenin and enamelin mRNA in maxillary first molars was first observed in pre-ameloblasts on the cusp slopes at day 2. The onsets of amelogenin and enamelin expression were approximately synchronous with the initial accumulation of predentin matrix. Both proteins were expressed by ameloblasts throughout the secretory, transition, and early maturation stages. Enamelin expression terminated in maturation stage ameloblasts on day 9, while amelogenin expression is still detected in maturation stage ameloblasts on day 14. No amelogenin expression was observed in day 21 mouse molars. Amelogenin and enamelin RNA messages were restricted to ameloblasts. No expression was observed in pulp, bone, or along the developing root. We conclude that amelogenin and enamelin are enamel-specific and do not directly participate in the formation of dentin or cementum in developing mouse molars.

Histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of calcifying odontogenic cysts

METHOD AND RESULTS

Calcifying odontogenic cysts (COCs) were examined histopathologically and immunohistochemically to characterize the histological and cytological properties of these lesions. Histopathologically, COCs showed thin or thick lining epithelium with ghost cells. COCs were classified according to proliferative type or nonproliferative type lining epithelium, the presence or absence of ameloblastomatous appearance, and the presence or absence of odontoma in the cyst walls. Immunohistochemically, amelogenin protein was expressed chiefly in ghost cells, whereas cytokeratin 19 (CK19) and bcl-2 proteins were expressed chiefly in lining epithelial cells. The proportion of cases positive for bcl-2 protein was slightly higher in COCs with odontoma than in those without odontoma. Lining epithelial cells sporadically showed positive reactions for Ki-67 antigen. Mean Ki-67 labeling index was slightly greater in COCs with proliferative type lining epithelium, COCs with ameloblastomatous appearance of the cyst walls, and COCs with odontoma of the cyst walls than in COCs without these histological features. Our results suggest that ghost cells or lining epithelial cells show ameloblastic cytodifferentiation or odontogenic epithelial characteristics, that bcl-2 protein is associated with survival of lining epithelial cells in COCs, and that high proliferation potential is associated with ameloblastomatous proliferation or combined odontoma. COCs exhibited various histological features with several transitional forms, and immunohistochemical examinations revealed little or no difference in cytodifferentiation and cellular activity among COCs.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that COCs with various histological features have neoplastic potential and may not be separate entities within the same histological spectrum.

Immunohistochemical detection of amelogenin and cytokeratin 19 in epithelial odontogenic tumors

OBJECTIVE

Epithelial odontogenic tumors exhibit considerable histological variation and are classified into several benign and malignant entities. Expression of amelogenin and cytokeratin 19 (CK19), that are potentially useful polypeptides for identification of odontogenic epithelial components, was evaluated in various types of epithelial odontogenic tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimens of 33 ameloblastomas, three calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumors (CEOTs), two clear cell odontogenic tumors (CCOTs) and five malignant ameloblastomas were examined by immunohistochemistry using anti-amelogenin and anti-CK19 antibodies.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical reactivity for amelogenin was detected in many peripheral columnar or cuboidal cells and some central polyhedral cells in ameloblastomas, and histological variants showed various degrees of amelogenin expression. Expression of CK19 was diffusely present in neoplastic cells in ameloblastomas, and decreased expression was found in keratinizing cells of acanthomatous variants and some neoplastic cells of desmoplastic variants. In CEOTs, immunohistochemical reactivity for amelogenin was detected in neoplastic cells and intercellular amyloid-like materials, whereas CK19 was expressed in neoplastic cells. CCOTs showed positive reactivity for amelogenin and CK19 in neoplastic cells. Malignant ameloblastomas exhibited various degrees of amelogenin expression with constant CK19 expression in neoplastic cells.

CONCLUSION

Diverse types of epithelial odontogenic tumors express amelogenin and CK19, suggesting that these tumors have ameloblastic differentiation or odontogenic epithelial properties.

Induction of amelogenin and ameloblastin by insulin and insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) during embryonic mouse tooth development in vitro

Insulin and insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) are considered pleiotropic, acting as both mitogen and differentiation factors. Several investigators have demonstrated the expression of insulin, IGFs, their cognate receptors and IGF binding proteins during tooth morphogenesis. Previous work done in our laboratory indicated that exogenous insulin and IGFs induce the accumulation of enamel extracellular matrix on mouse mandibular molars cultured in a serumless, chemically defined medium. In order to determine the level of control of these factors in the induction of enamel biomineralization, we designed experiments to quantitate mRNAs for enamel specific-gene products. Mandibular first molars (MI) obtained from E15 Swiss Webster mice were placed in organ culture in the presence of insulin (1,000 ng/ml), IGF-I (100 ng/ml) or IGF-II (100 ng/ml) for 6, 12 and 18-days. At termination date, the RNA was extracted and the concentration of mRNAs for amelogenin, tuftelin and ameloblastin were determined using a quantitative competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique (PCR mimic). Our results showed that after 6-days in culture; treatment with insulin, IGF-I and IGF-II increased the synthesis of amelogenin and ameloblastin. In contrast, the expression of tuftelin mRNA was not affected by either factor. In conclusion, our studies showed that the increase in enamel matrix formation by overexpression of IGFs is the result of transcriptional regulation of enamel specific proteins like amelogenin and ameloblastin but not tuftelin. These studies also suggest that the regulatory mechanisms controlling tuftelin gene expression are different than the mechanisms regulating ameloblastin and amelogenin transcription.

Abortive secretion of an enamel matrix in the inner enamel epithelial cells during an enameloid formation in the gar-pike, Lepisosteus oculatus (Holostei, Actinopterygii)

The tooth in the gar-pike, Lepisosteus oculatus, an actinopterygian fish, is characterized by the occurrence of both enamel and enameloid, the former covering the tooth shaft and the latter, the tooth cap. Our previous research demonstrated that the enamel in this species was, as in the lungfish, immunoreactive for amelogenin, indicating its homologous nature with the mammalian tooth enamel, whereas the enameloid was completely immunonegative. The present study demonstrates that, during the early maturation stage of the enameloid formation, the inner enamel epithelial cells (IEECs) synthesize through a well-developed Golgi apparatus a fine-granular substance which is intensely immunoreactive for amelogenin. This substance was accumulated in a large saccule extended in a suprabasal zone of the cell; we were unable to find any morphological sign indicating a connection of the substance with the enameloid matrix. The abortive secretion of the enamel matrix-like substance in the IEEC during an enameloid formation was considered to be an instance of rudimental enamel formation. In the gar-pike, the synthesis of amelogenin in the IEEC has been demonstrated to occur independently from that of the enameloid matrix. The present findings demonstrate a prominent difference between the tooth enamel and enameloid.

[Expression of rat amelogenin gene in Escherichia coli]

OBJECTIVE

To detect the expression of amelogenin (Am) gene in Escherichia coli (E. coli).

METHODS

The cDNA fragmain of Am gene was obtained with EcoRI and Xhol I from the plasmid PUC18/Am. The fragment was inserted into prokaryotic gene fusion vector PGEX-4T-2 and an expression plasmid PGEX-4T-2/Am was constructed. PGEX-4T-2/Am was induced by IPTG for 4 h.

RESULTS

15% SDS-PAGE revealed a new forein protein band near 27,000.

CONCLUSION

The constructed plasmid expresses Am gene in E. coli.

Expression of amelin and amelogenin in epithelial root sheath remnants of fully formed rat molars

OBJECTIVE

To study the expression patterns of 2 enamel proteins, amelin and amelogenin, in the epithelial cells of the root sheath of fully formed rat molars.

STUDY DESIGN

Twelve Sprague-Dawley rats, 50, 65, and 85 days of age, were used in this study. The maxillae of the rats were dissected free, and sagittal serial sections were made through the mesial root of the first molar. In situ hybridization of amelin and amelogenin mRNAs was performed, and immunohistochemical examinations of the corresponding proteins in the epithelial cells of the root sheaths of fully formed rat molars were performed. Antibodies against epidermal keratins were used to identify epithelial root sheath remnants.

RESULTS

A group of epithelial cells, enclosed at the border between cellular cementum and dentin, expressed and synthesized amelin, but not amelogenin. Another group of epithelial cells, forming islands or strands, which were partially or totally incorporated in the matrix of the cellular cementum, expressed and synthesized both amelogenin and amelin. A third group of epithelial cells at the periphery of the cellular cementum expressed neither of the 2 proteins. Epithelial cells at the surface of acellular cementum did not express either of the 2 proteins.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the epithelial root sheath remnants in rat molars express and synthesize amelogenin, as well as amelin. However, there are marked regional differences. The roles of the enamel proteins in the formation of the radicular hard tissues of the rat molars and in the maintenance of the periodontal tissues remain to be clarified.

Type X collagen in human enamel development: a possible role in mineralization

Although type X collagen is one of the key molecules in endochondral ossification, no data are available on whether it is present in dental structures when mineralization is proceeding. We therefore monitored the appearance of type X collagen in tooth germs of human samples ranging in gestational age from 17-week-old fetuses to 9-week-old newborn. Using immunohistochemistry, ELISA techniques, and Western blotting, we show that type X collagen is present in human tooth germ during enamel maturation. Intense immunohistochemical staining for collagen type X was observed in the enamel and in the apical parts of secretory ameloblast at the bell stage when the dentine and enamel matrix were already under formation. The odontoblasts, the dentine, and the pulp were not stained. In the early (9-week) postnatal stage, the staining for collagen type X in the enamel matrix was diminished, and only a very weak signal could be detected in the secretory ameloblasts. A positive reaction for collagen type X was also observed in ELISA assay of extracts obtained from human embryonic enamel and hypertrophic cartilage samples. The Western blot analysis of the enamel demonstrated that size of the molecule detected by MoAb X53 is characteristic of the type X collagen. This correlates well with our immunohistochemical findings. Based on these data, we propose that type X collagen is one of the candidate molecules present in the enamel matrix that might be involved in mineralization of the enamel.

Autoradiographic investigation of the effect of 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-bisphosphonate on matrix protein synthesis and secretion by secretory ameloblasts in rat incisors

Seven daily subcutaneous injections of 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-bisphosphonate (HEBP) can induce enamel hypoplasia. Several enamel-free zones were observed along the crown-analogue side of rat incisors during the secretory stage of amelogenesis. Ameloblasts related to the enamel-free zones lay directly on the abnormally non-mineralized mantle dentine, whereas the adjacent ameloblasts, which were forming the enamel matrix layer, were associated with the region where mineralization of dentine was proceeding. The further purpose of this study was to investigate the synthetic and secretory activity of these two groups of ameloblasts and to trace the fate of the radioactively labelled proteins. [(3)H]-proline was administered to Wistar rats 12 h after the last injection of HEBP. Light-microscopic autoradiography was performed. Quantitative analysis indicated that the ameloblasts of the enamel-forming zones in the drug-treated group showed a distribution pattern of silver grains similar to that of the controls. The ameloblasts of the enamel-free zones also demonstrated incorporation of [(3)H]-proline at the same level. There was some labelling over the non-mineralized mantle dentine, which was supposed to indicate the penetration of ameloblast products. From these results, it is concluded that HEBP does not affect the ameloblast activity in protein synthesis. The complete failure of enamel-layer formation in some specific regions is probably due to the failure in protein secretion and protein deposition. This study provides additional evidence that the mineralization of dentine is an essential factor in successful enamel matrix secretion and deposition.

Ghost cells in calcifying odontogenic cyst express enamel-related proteins

The so-called ghost cell is a unique cell type occurring in a variety of odontogenic and non-odontogenic lesions. However, the true nature of ghost cells has not been determined. In the present study, we examined the immunoreactivity of ghost cells in calcifying odontogenic cysts and dermal calcifying epitheliomas, with antibodies against amelogenin, enamelin, sheath protein (sheathlin) and enamelysin, in an attempt to clarify the nature of this unique cell. The cytoplasm of ghost cells in calcifying odontogenic cysts demonstrated distinct immunolocalization of the enamel-related proteins, while similar in the calcifying epitheliomas of the skin showed a negative reaction. The results indicate that the ghost cells in calcifying odontogenic cysts, as opposed to ghost cells in dermal calcifying epitheliomas, contain enamel-related proteins in their cytoplasm accumulated during the process of pathological transformation.

Gene expression and immunolocalization of amelogenin in enamel hypoplasia induced by successive injections of bisphosphonate in rat incisors

Successive injections of 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-bisphosphonate (HEBP) in rats induce enamel hypoplasia. To elucidate the pathogenesis of this hypoplasia, male Wistar rats were daily injected with HEBP or physiological saline for 7 days. After the last injection, they were killed under anaesthesia and their maxillary incisors were examined using an in situ hybridization technique and immunohistochemical staining to detect the gene expression and localization of amelogenin protein, respectively. In the HEBP-injected rats, several islets of partially mineralized enamel were present along crown-analogous surface of the incisor in the secretory stage of amelogenesis and enamel-free zones existed between these islets. In situ hybridization demonstrated amelogenin gene expression over the ameloblasts facing the islets of the matrix enamel as well as over those of the enamel-free zones. Immunohistochemical studies using rabbit antiamelogenin antibody revealed positive reaction both in the enamel matrix of the control group and in the islets of enamel matrix of the HEBP-injected group. Some small granules immunoreactive to amelogenin antibody were found in the distal portions of the ameloblasts in the HEBP-injected rats. The results indicate that HEBP does not alter amelogenin gene expression over ameloblasts, or the protein's existence in enamel matrix. There appeared to be some accumulation of amelogenin in the HEBP-treated ameloblasts. It is therefore suggested that the enamel hypoplasia in this experiment may not be due to a disturbance in amelogenin synthesis but to a disturbance in a later process, presumably of protein secretion.

Expression of cytokeratins in human enamel organ

Cytokeratin (CK) is a filament which plays a central role in epithelial tissue and, like the polypeptides of intermediate filaments in general, shows a high degree of tissue specificity. The CK expression patterns of odontogenic epithelia are still poorly described. We studied the distribution of individual CK polypeptides in the human enamel organ at bell stage and in remnants of the dental lamina. Our immunohistochemical study showed that epithelial cells stained for CKs 7, 13, 14 and 19 with slight changes in their pattern during the differentiation phase of odontogenesis. There was negative staining for all other CK polypeptides tested (CKs 8, 10, 16, 17 and 18). Most of the CKs in the enamel organ epithelia did not show differences related to the stage-specific state of differentiation, except for CKs 14 and 19 at the inner enamel epithelium. A strong label for CK 14 was present at the inner dental epithelium at early bell stage, and this was substituted by CK 19 at the late bell stage when the ameloblasts were fully differentiated.

Identification of two additional exons at the 3' end of the amelogenin gene

Alternative splicing of the amelogenin gene generates a family of proteins secreted by ameloblasts that are primarily responsible for tooth enamel formation. Here the presence of two additional exons, downstream of exon 7, which are followed by an alternate polyadenylation site, is reported. Long polymerase chain reaction was used with a rat genomic amelogenin template to amplify sequences downstream from the primary polyadenylation site. Within the amplified sequences, two exons of 45 bp (exon 8) and 110 bp (exon 9) were identified. The presence of these additional exons in the human and mouse genome was indicated by Southern blot analysis. Antibodies raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to a sequence encoded by exon 9 positively stained ameloblasts in sections of developing murine and porcine unerupted teeth. These results suggest that an amelogenin protein(s) that includes sequences derived from exons 8 and 9 is synthesized by the ameloblasts.

Expression and localization of ferritin mRNA in ameloblasts of rat incisor

At the maturation stage, the ameloblasts of the rat incisor incorporate iron, supplied through the bloodstream, and deposit it into the surface layer of the enamel. In this unique iron transport system, ferritin functions as a transient iron reservoir in the cells. Here the expression of ferritin mRNA and its localization in the rat enamel organ was examined. Among various tissues, the enamel organ showed the highest expression for both ferritin H- and L-chain mRNA, as quantified by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. In situ hybridization using digoxigenin-labelled cRNA probes for each chain demonstrated that both ferritin H- and L-chain mRNA were abundantly expressed in presecretory and secretory ameloblasts. The intensity of the positive hybridization signal gradually decreased toward the incisal direction. Differing from the mRNA localization, ferritin protein was immunologically undetectable in presecretory or secretory ameloblasts but was found in ameloblasts at the maturation stage, into which iron is known to be incorporated from the bloodstream. Thus, the expression of ferritin mRNA precedes the protein expression in the developmental stages of rat incisor ameloblasts, and the translation of ferritin and its half-life are probably controlled by the iron entry, as has been reported for other cell types.

Protein-to-protein interactions: criteria defining the assembly of the enamel organic matrix

Enamel crystallites form in a protein matrix located proximal to the ameloblast cell layer. This unique organic extracellular matrix is constructed from structural protein components biosynthesized and secreted by ameloblasts. To date, three distinct classes of enamel matrix proteins have been cloned. These are the amelogenins, tuftelin, and ameloblastin, with recent data implicating ameloblastin gene expression during cementogenesis. The organic enamel extracellular matrix undergoes assembly to provide a three-dimensional array of protein domains that carry out the physiologic function of guiding enamel hydroxyapatite crystallite formation. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we have surveyed these three known enamel gene products for their ability to direct self-assembly. We measured the capacity of the enamel gene products to direct protein-to-protein interactions, a characteristic of enamel proteins predicated to be required for self-assembly. We provide additional evidence for the self-assembly nature of amelogenin and tuftelin. Ameloblastin self-assembly could not be demonstrated, nor were protein-to-protein interactions observed between ameloblastin and either amelogenin or tuftelin. Within the limits of the yeast two-hybrid assay, these findings constrain the emerging model of enamel matrix assembly by helping to define the limits of enamel matrix protein-protein interactions that are believed to guide enamel mineral crystallite formation.

Sheath proteins: synthesis, secretion, degradation and fate in forming enamel

We investigated expression of ameloblastin and sheathlin, recently cloned enamel matrix proteins from the rat and pig, in forming enamel immunocytochemically and immunochemically, using region-specific antibodies. The results obtained from the rat and pig were essentially the same. Antibodies which recognize the N-terminal region stained the secretory machinery of the secretory ameloblast and the entire thickness of the enamel matrix, especially the peripheral region of the enamel rod. Immunostained protein bands were observed near 65 or 70 kDa and below 20 kDa. C-terminal-specific antibodies stained the secretory machinery of the ameloblast and the immature enamel adjacent to the secretion sites. Immunostained protein bands were found ranging from 25 to 70 kDa. Antibodies which recognize a region in the protein just prior to the C-terminal region stained the cis-side of the Golgi apparatus but not the enamel matrix. Immunostained protein bands were observed of about 55 kDa. These results suggest that post-translational and post-secretory modifications of ameloblastin and sheathlin are similar to each other, and further showed that their cleaved N-terminal polypeptides concentrate in the prism sheath. We propose that sheathlin and ameloblastin share the same role in amelogenesis and should be classified as sheath proteins.

Gene expression and immunolocalisation of amelogenins in developing embryonic and neonatal hamster teeth

Amelogenins are a group of related matrix proteins, synthesised and secreted by ameloblasts during the formation of dental enamel. We have examined expression patterns and the tissue distribution of amelogenins by in situ hybridisation and by immunohistochemistry of developing teeth of embryonic (E12-E15) and neonatal (1- to 4-day-old) golden hamsters. Amelogenin expression and (intracellular) immunostaining for amelogenins were first observed in late embryonic stages in E14 incisors and E15 first molars in partially polarised pre-ameloblasts located along a thin layer of predentine before any overt deposition of enamel. Expression of mRNA and protein staining for amelogenins increased with age and early pre-dentine became immunopositive. The highest mRNA levels and substantial immunostaining for amelogenins were noted in neonatal-stage secretory ameloblasts fully engaged in enamel matrix deposition. After completion of the secretory phase, amelogenin gene expression continued at a lower level in post-secretory stages and was seen in transition-phase and maturation-phase ameloblasts. No amelogenin transcripts were observed in odontoblasts at any stage of their development. However, young odontoblasts stained weakly with anti-amelogenin antibodies before they formed the first layer of dentine, although this staining disappeared in odontoblasts at later stages of development. We conclude that amelogenin gene transcription occurs as early as the polarisation stage of pre-ameloblasts and is closely followed by translation of mRNA into amelogenin proteins. Odontoblasts do not transcribe the amelogenin gene and probably endocytose and digest amelogenins from the pre-dentine. Amelogenins are also transcribed but at a low level in post-secretory stages of amelogenesis.

Protein interactions during assembly of the enamel organic extracellular matrix

Enamel is the outermost covering of teeth and contains the largest hydroxyapatite crystallites formed in the vertebrate body. Enamel forms extracellularly through the ordered assembly of a protein scaffolding that regulates crystallite dimensions. The two most studied proteins of the enamel extracellular matrix (ECM) are amelogenin and tuftelin. The underlying mechanism for assembly of the proteins within the enamel extracellular matrix and the regulatory role of crystallite-protein interactions have proven elusive. We used the two-hybrid system to identify and define minimal protein domains responsible for supra molecular assembly of the enamel ECM. We show that amelogenin proteins self-assemble, and this self-assembly depends on the amino-terminal 42 residues interacting either directly or indirectly with a 17-residue domain in the carboxyl region. Amelogenin and tuftelin fail to interact with each other. Based upon this data, and advances in the field, a model for amelogenin assemblies that direct enamel biomineralization is presented.

Regulation of amelogenin gene expression

The amelogenins are found uniquely in enamel, where they constitute the predominant class of secreted matrix proteins and where they play a fundamental role in normal enamel formation. To better understand the high level of tissue-specific expression, we cloned the bovine X and Y chromosomal amelogenin genes and the murine amelogenin gene and determined the DNA sequences for the regions upstream of the transcription start sites. We observed segments of strong homology among species, and identified consensus sequences for the binding of various transcription factors, including the glucocorticoid receptor, AP1, RXR and p53. Although specific sis-elements conferring enhanced transcription have not yet been identified, elements have been localized that have silencing effect in non-ameloblast cells. Conserved sequences are likely to be involved in tissue-specific expression. Transgenic mouse studies have shown that 3.5 kb of upstream region is sufficient but 900 bp is insufficient for specific expression in vivo. Alternative splicing of the primary transcript is an effective mechanism for generating molecular heterogeneity. Amelogenin genes contain seven exons, and exons 3, 4, 5 and most of 6 can be deleted by alternative splicing. However, the pattern of exon splicing varies according to the species, and skipping of bovine exon 3 appears to be developmentally regulated. It will be important to determine whether the relative amounts of translation products differ among species as do the mRNAs, and to correlate the various protein structures with function. These findings also suggest that the regulation of amelogenin gene expression is complex and takes place at several levels.

The biomimetics of enamel: a paradigm for organized biomaterials synthesis

The formation of enamel takes place through a sequence of processes that can be mimicked in inorganic materials chemistry. This chapter describes the generic features of enamel biomineralization in terms of a house-building analogy. Four stages are identified: supramolecular preorganization and spatial patterning; interfacial molecular recognition in inorganic nucleation; vectorial crystallization; and pattern evolution and hierarchy. Each of these concepts can be translated into synthetic approaches to the formation of inorganic materials with organized architectures. An example of applying this biomimetic paradigm is described. Supersaturated water-in-oil microemulsions have been used to synthesize microskeletal calcium phosphates by controlled nucleation and vectorial growth in constrained reaction environments. The results of these preliminary studies suggest that biomimetic concepts could be useful in the fabrication of biomaterial implants with controlled porosity and microstructure.

Molecular strategies of tooth enamel formation are highly conserved during vertebrate evolution

The vertebrate body plan is determined by a variety of morphoregulatory genes that are highly conserved throughout evolution. This review presents a phylogenetic analysis of selected molecular and morphological features in vertebrates with particular emphasis upon the phylogeny of tooth morphogenesis and enamel formation. Three lines of evidence support our hypothesis that the agnathans (e.g. hagfishes) are the most primitive extant vertebrates and that enamel gene products are highly conserved during vertebrate evolution. First, an antibody raised against the polypeptide produced by exon 4 of the mouse amelogenin gene recognizes proteins in hagfish, sharks, reptiles and mammals. Second, electron photomicrographic evidence suggests heterochronic shifts in the relative time and rate of enamel formation during vertebrate tooth evolution. Third, mRNA phenotyping suggests significant homology between amelogenin transcripts expressed in species of various vertebrate phyla including agnathans and mammals. These three lines of evidence indicate that amelogenin gene products are expressed in agnathan, reptilian and mammalian teeth.

Amelogenin proteins of developing dental enamel

The amelogenins of developing dental enamel are tissue-specific proteins, rich in proline, leucine, histidine and glutamyl residues, and synthesized by the ameloblast cells of the inner enamel epithelium. These proteins comprise the bulk of the extracellular matrix that becomes mineralized with a hydroxyapatite phase to become the mature enamel. Examination of the amino acid sequences of amelogenins from a range of mammals shows a high degree of evolutionary sequence conservation, suggestive of specialized function. Recently it has been shown that multiple amelogenin components, observed in the matrix, arise both by a sequence of post-secretory proteolytic processing and by the expression of alternatively spliced mRNAs generated from the amelogenin gene(s) that are located on the sex chromosomes. Although the function of these amelogenins in enamel biomineralization is unknown, physico-chemical studies of recombinant amelogenins have shown that they undergo a self-assembly process in vitro generating supra-molecular 'nanosphere' structures, and recent observations in vivo point to a functional role for the nanospheres in the ultrastructural organization of the secretory enamel matrix, conducive to the organized development of the earliest mineral crystallites.

Expression patterns of RNAs for amelin and amelogenin in developing rat molars and incisors

We have recently identified a novel RNA sequence in ameloblasts, coding for amelin (Cerny et al., 1996). In the present paper, its expression has been compared with that of amelogenin in developing incisors and molars of rats, by means of in situ hybridization of paraffin sections. The RNAs for both amelin and amelogenin were highly expressed in secretory ameloblasts. The expression of RNA for amelogenin gradually decreased in the post-secretory ameloblasts. In contrast, the RNA expression for amelin remained high in post-secretory ameloblasts up to the stage of fusion between dental and oral epithelia at the time of tooth eruption. We suggest that amelin might be involved in the mineralization of enamel or in the attachment of ameloblasts to the enamel surface. The whole-mount in situ hybridization procedure is described for the first time in dental research. It proved to be a useful method and confirmed the results of the conventional in situ hybridization.

High expression of human amelogenin in E. coli

A human cDNA, encoding for the 175-amino-acid human amelogenin, was prepared by RT PCR from tooth bud mRNA and sub-cloned into pGEX-KG expression plasmid for over-expression in E. coli. The expressed protein was characterized by SDS-PAGE Western blotting, and N-terminal amino acid sequencing.