Improved outcome in penile cancer with radiologically enhanced stratification protocol for lymph node staging procedures: a study in 316 inguinal basins with a mean follow-up of 5 years

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis is the main determinant of survival in penile cancer patients. Conventionally clinical palpability is used to stratify patients to Inguinal Lymph node dissection (ILND) if clinically node positive (cN +) or Dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) if clinically node negative (cN0). Studies suggest a false negative rate (FNR) of around 10% (5-13%) for DSNB. To our knowledge there are no studies reporting harder end point of survival and outcomes of all clinically node positive (cN +) patients. We present our outcome data of all patients with penile cancer including false negative rates and survival in both DSNB and ILND groups.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients (316 inguinal basins), who had lymph node surgery for penile cancer in a tertiary referral centre from Jan 2008 to 2018, were included in the study. All patients underwent ultrasound (US) ± fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and then MRI/ CT, if needed, to stage their disease. We used combined clinical and radiological criteria (node size, architecture loss, irregular margins) to stratify patients to DSNB vs ILND as opposed to clinical palpability alone.

RESULTS

11.2% i.e., 27/241 inguinal basins had lymph node positive disease by DSNB. 54.9% i.e., 39/71 inguinal basins (IBs) had lymph node-positive disease by ILND. 4 inguinal basins with no tracer uptake in sentinel node scans are being monitored at patient's request and have not had any recurrences to date. With a mean follow-up of 65 months (range 24-150), the false-negative rate (FNR) for DSNB is 0%. Judicious uses of cross-sectional imaging necessitated ILND in 2 inguinal basins with non-palpable nodes and negative US with false positive rate of 6.3% (2/32) for ILND. The same cohort of DSNB patients might have had 11.1% (3/27) FNR if only palpability criteria was used. 43 (28%) patients who did require cross sectional imaging as per our criteria had a low node positive rate of 4.7% (p = 0.03). Mean cancer specific survival of all node-positive patients was 105 months.

CONCLUSION

The performance of DSNB improved with enhanced radiological stratification of patients to either DSNB or ILND. We for the first time report the comprehensive outcome of all lymph node staging procedures in penile cancer.

[Clinical appraisal of laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy with preservation of the great saphenous vein through subcutaneous approach via umbilical cord for the treatment of penile carcinoma: Report of 27 cases]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical efficacy and advantages of laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (IL) with preservation of the great saphenous vein through subcutaneous approach via umbilical cord for the treatment of penile carcinoma patients.

METHODS

The data of 27 patients with penile cancer underwent the laparoscopic inguinal lymph adenectomy with preservation of the great saphenous vein through subcutaneous via umbilical cord approach in the General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command from 2014 May to 2022 May were analyzed retrospectively.All patients underwent partial penile resection, with a pathological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma and 20 cases were highly differentiated, 7 cases were moderately differentiated, with the average age was 54 ± 7.5 years old. All patients were in supine position, and a subcutaneous space was established under visualization to establish a laparoscopic operation channel. The scope of cleaning included the superficial and deep inguinal lymph nodes, while the key aspects of the procedure was the preservation of the main trunk of the great saphenous vein. The external boundary of bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection was the line between the anterior superior iliac spine and 20cm lower, the inner boundary was pubic tubercle and its 15cm medical lower measurement, and the line between the inner boundary and the external lower edge was the lower boundary.

RESULT

All the 27 patients were successfully completed without transfer to open surgery. The average operation time was (115 ± 26) minutes, the average blood loss during operation was (40 ± 8) ml, postoperative hospital stays was (6.8 ± 1.5) days, and postoperative drainage tube removal time was (6.4 ± 1.2) days. The average number of lymph nodes was 12.5 (5-21) on the left side, and 11.4 (2-19) on the right side. No skin necrosis and subcutaneous hematoma was occurred in all patients. Three patients had postoperative lymphatic leakage and two patients had lymphatic cysts. All patients were cured by conservation treatment. No recurrence and metastasis were occurred during 14-28 months follow up postoperatively. Conclusion： Laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy with preservation of the great saphenous vein through subcutaneous approach via umbilical cord can achieve the expected surgical outcome. It has some advantages of shorter operation time, less blood loss，low incidence of complication ,especially avoid skin flap necrosis and subcutaneous hematoma．.

Racial differences in survival for early stage (T1) penile cancer: Analysis from the SEER database

BACKGROUND

Penile cancer accounts for less than 1% of male cancers in the United States. Localized disease, particularly T1 tumors are potentially curable with local therapy. We present the racial differences in survival outcomes for T1, penile cancer from the SEER database.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2016 all men with T1, N0, M0 penile cancer in the SEER-18 database were included. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox-Regression analysis were conducted to investigate prognostic variables for cancer specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 4,406 men were identified with penile cancer; 1,941 men had T1 disease. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis showed those with primary site surgery had better 5-year CSS compared to those without primary site surgery (P <.0001) and a significant difference in CSS based on race (P= 0.0078). On multivariable analysis, Hispanic individuals had worse CSS (HR 1.92; P = 0.0057) compared to the White men. Black men were also found to have a poor CSS however this was not statistically significant (HR 1.53, P = 0.118). Men with penile cancer who had either penectomy (HR 0.45; P = 0.006) or penile preservation surgery (HR 0.25; P< 0.001) had improved CSS.

CONCLUSION

Racial disparities in CSS exist among men with in early-stage penile cancer. KM analysis showed significant differences in CSS by race and in those receiving primary site surgery. On multivariable analysis, the CSS is worse in Hispanic compared to White men. There is a trend towards worse CSS in Black men however this was not statistically significant.

Penile cancer in younger men-A more aggressive disease?

INTRODUCTION

Penile cancer (PC) in men under 45 is very rare with an incidence of 0.1 to 0.8/100,000. There is little published data on disease characteristics and outcomes of PC in younger men. Herein, we evaluate the disease characteristics and outcomes of penile cancer in younger men compared to an older cohort.

METHODS

This study included all men diagnosed with PC at our institution from 2016 to 2021. Primary outcomes included overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes included disease characteristics and surgical management. Men aged ≤45 years (Group A) were compared with men aged >45 years (Group B) at diagnosis.

RESULTS

There were 90 patients treated for invasive PC over the study period. The median age at diagnosis was 64 (26-88). The mean length of follow-up was 27 (±18) months. There were 12 (13%) in Group A, and 78 (87%) patients in Group B. Group A had a worse cancer-specific survival compared to Group B (39 months vs. not reached, HR 0.1 (95%CI 0.02-0.85, P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in overall or disease-free survival between both groups. More men in Group A had lymph node metastases at the time of diagnosis (58% vs. 19%, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in histopathological features including tumor subtype, grade, T stage, p53 status or presence of lymphovascular or perineural invasion.

CONCLUSION

In our study, younger men were more likely to have nodal involvement at time of diagnosis and had a worse cancer-specific survival.

Surgical and Functional Outcomes of Penile Amputation and Perineal Urethrostomy Configuration in Invasive Penile Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of invasive penile cancer is based on partial or total penectomy and perineal urethrostomy configuration.1-3 To report surgical and functional outcomes of penile amputation and perineal urethrostomy configuration in a consecutive series of patients with invasive penile cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted from January 2018 to December 2022. Data were extracted from clinical records and operative notes. As primary outcomes, surgical complications were described. Oncological outcomes through cancer-specific survival and overall survival were analyzed. Patient survival was estimated by a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Functional outcomes were assessed through the administration of the International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) questionnaire at 3 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall 10 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 16 months (Interquartile range (IQR 12-18)). The median age was 71 years (IQR 63-79). Operative time was set at 195 minutes (IQR 155-275). The median hospital stay was 8 days (IQR: 6-10). Postoperative complications occurred in 20% of patients, in 1 case surgical revision was necessary. Positive surgical margins were detected only in 1 patient. The median catheterization time was 15 days (IQR: 15-32). One patient developed local recurrence. At 1 year, the cancer-specific survival was 80% and overall survival was 60%. The median preoperative IPSS was 15 (IQR 12-19). The median postoperative IPSS was 6 (IQR 5-7).

CONCLUSION

Penile amputation and perineal urethrostomy configuration was demonstrated to be a safe and effective procedure to address invasive penile cancer.

[Double-channel expansion of the subcutaneous lower abdominal tunnel for sequential inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer - Report of six cases]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of the two-channel dilatation procedure for subcutaneous tunneling in the lower abdomen during pelvic lymph node dissection for penile cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 6 patients treated from January 2020 to December 2022 using the dual-channel expansion technique for penile cancer lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

All 6 cases ( 12 sides) successfully underwent prophylactic inguinal lymph node dissection. The average laparoscopic dissection time was ( 82.50 ± 12.08) minutes per side, with an average blood loss of （28.33 ± 10.95） ml. The number of lymph nodes dissected was （11.16 ± 1.02） for the superficial group and ( 0.67 ± 0.74 ) for the deep group. Postoperative pathology was negative in all cases. The average postoperative hospital stay was （7.33 ± 1.60 ） days, with a catheter removal time of （12.00 ± 2.06）days. Postoperative complications included abnormal skin sensations in 5 sides, lower limb edema in 3 sides, lymphedema in 3 sides, and cellulitis in 1 side. During a follow-up period of （20.60 ± 12.51）months, there were no instances of tumor recurrence or metastasis in the inguinal region among the patients.

CONCLUSION

The dual-channel expansion technique for inguinal lymph node dissection via a subcutaneous tunnel is a safe and feasible treatment for penile cancer. It has a low complication rate, allows for thorough dissection of inguinal lymph nodes, and offers advantages in terms of surgical time.

[Keratoacanthoma of the penis: A case report and literature review]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical characteristics and treatment options of keratoacanthoma (KA) of the penis.

METHODS

We report the diagnosis and treatment of a case of penile keratoacanthoma in our hospital and review the literature.

RESULTS

The patient was admitted due to the discovery of a "new lesion on the glans for 4 months," diagnosed with a penile tumor, underwent tumor resection surgery, with histopathological examination revealing squamous epithelial hyperplasia, thickening, and excessive keratinization. The postoperative pathological diagnosis was penile keratoacanthoma. There was no recurrence or metastasis during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

KA is a relatively rare benign tumor with potential malignant transformation, and close follow-up is necessary postoperatively.

Inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer patients: a comparison between open and video endoscopic approach in a multicenter setting

OBJECTIVES

To compare differences of operative outcomes, post-operative complications and survival outcomes between open and laparoscopic cases in a multicenter study.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study performed at three European centers from September 2011 to January 2019. The surgeon decision to perform open inguinal lymphadenectomy (OIL) or video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) was done in each hospital after patient counselling. Inclusion criteria regarded a minimum follow-up of 9 months since the inguinal lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients with proven squamous cell penile cancer underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy. 26 of them underwent OIL, while 29 patients underwent VEIL. For the OIL and VEIL groups, the mean operative time was 2.5 vs. 3.4 h (p=0.129), respectively. Hospital stays were lower in the VEIL group with 4 vs. 8 days in OIL patients (p=0.053) while number of days requiring drains to remain in situ was 3 vs. 6 days (p=0.024). The VEIL group reported a lower incidence of major complications compared to the OIL group (2 vs. 17%, p=0.0067) while minor complications were comparable in both groups. In a median follow-up period of 60 months, the overall survival was 65.5 and 84.6% in OIL and VEIL groups, respectively (p=0.105).

CONCLUSIONS

VEIL is comparable to OIL regarding safety, overall survival and post-operative outcomes.

[Penile cancer with perineural invasion is more prone to postoperative recurrence]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the correlation between perineural invasion and postoperative recurrence in patients surgically treated for penile cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical data on 18 penile cancer patients surgically treated in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2021, 8 with postoperative recurrence (the recurrence group) and the other 10 without (the non-recurrence control group). We compared the two groups of patients in the age of onset, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stages, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) prognosis stages, surgical methods, perineural invasion and recurrence time. We analyzed the differences in postoperative recurrence using the Kaplan Meier plotted survival curve and in independent risk factors in predicting postoperative recurrence using the ROC curve.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-recurrence controls, the patients in the recurrence group had a significantly older age of onset (P=0.0411) and severer perineural invasion (P<0.001), and those with perineural invasion had a shorter recurrence time (P<0.001), which was an independent risk factor for postoperative recurrence. The areas under the ROC curves for perineural invasion and age were 0.885 and 0.213, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Penile cancer with perineural invasion is more prone to and perineural invasion is an independent risk factor for postoperative recurrence of the malignancy.

Bilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection vs. unilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection and dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinical N1 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the role of unilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection (ILND) plus contralateral dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) vs. bilateral ILND in clinical N1 (cN1) penile squamous cell carcinoma (peSCC) patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Within our institutional database (1980-2020, included), we identified 61 consecutive cT1-4 cN1 cM0 patients with histological confirmed peSCC who underwent either unilateral ILND plus DSNB (26) or bilateral ILND (35).

RESULTS

Median age was 54 years (Interquartile range [IQR]: 48-60 years). Median follow-up was 68 months (IQR 21-105 months). Most patients had pT1 (23 %) or pT2 (54.1%), as well as G2 (47.5%) or G3 (23%) tumors, while lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was present in 67.1% of cases. Considering a cN1 and a cN0 groin, overall 57 out of 61 patients (93.5%) had nodal disease in the cN1 groin. Conversely, only 14 out of 61 patients (22.9%) had nodal disease in the cN0 groin. 5-year IR-free survival was 91% (Confidence interval [CI] 80%-100%) for bilateral ILND group and 88% (CI 73%-100%) for the ipsilateral ILND plus DSNB group (P-value 0.8). Conversely, 5-year CSS was 76% (CI 62%-92%) for bilateral ILND group and 78% (CI 63%-97%) for the ipsilateral ILND plus contralateral DSNB group (P-value 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cN1 peSCC the risk of occult contralateral nodal disease is comparable to cN0 high risk peSCC and the gold standard, namely bilateral ILND, may be replaced by unilateral ILND and contralateral DSNB without affecting positive node detection, IRRs and CSS.

Combined Reporting of Surgical Quality and Cancer Control after Surgical Treatment for Penile Tumors with Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: The Tetrafecta Achievement

BACKGROUND

To optimize results reporting after penile cancer (PC) surgery, we proposed a Tetrafecta and assessed its ability to predict overall survival (OS) probabilities.

METHODS

A purpose-built multicenter, multi-national database was queried for stage I-IIIB PC, requiring inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND), from 2015 onwards. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method assessed differences in OS between patients achieving Tetrafecta or not. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses identified its predictors.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients were included in the analysis. The 45 patients (29%) that achieved the Tetrafecta were younger (59 vs. 62 years; p = 0.01) and presented with fewer comorbidities (ASA score ≥ 3: 0% vs. 24%; p < 0.001). Although indicated, ILND was omitted in 8 cases (5%), while in 16, a modified template was properly used. Although median LNs yield was 17 (IQR: 11-27), 35% of the patients had <7 nodes retrieved from the groin. At Kaplan-Maier analysis, the Tetrafecta cohort displayed significantly higher OS probabilities (Log Rank = 0.01). Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses identified age as the only independent predictor of Tetrafecta achievement (OR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.94-0.99; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our Tetrafecta is the first combined outcome to comprehensively report results after PC surgery. It is widely applicable, based on standardized and reproducible variables and it predicts all-cause mortality.

Challenges in Organ-sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer: What Are the Limits?

Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) is endorsed by the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines as the preferred treatment for distal primary penile cancer. The recommendation states that OSS should be used whenever possible, without exactly defining what constitutes "possible". This recommendation is based on findings showing that this approach has no detrimental impact on survival. At the same time, OSS results in preservation of quality of life (QoL) and of various functions of the penis. However, while narrow tumor-free margins (>1 mm) are deemed oncologically safe, there is a higher risk of local recurrence. Recent data have emerged that question the dogma that a local recurrence does not impact survival outcomes. In this mini review, we highlight areas of discrepancy in current guidelines and describe challenges for a surgical approach with a delicate balance between oncological safety on the one hand and maximal preservation of QoL and penile functions on the other. PATIENT SUMMARY: Organ-sparing surgery has been recommended as the preferred treatment for primary cancer of the penis, as quality of life and sexual function are maximally preserved. In this review we identify challenges and limitations in routinely adopting this approach.

Recent developments in the diagnosis and management of N1 penile cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article presents a critical review of the current literature to provide a brief update on the contemporary advances in diagnosing and managing N1 penile cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) has evolved from being an orphan field for cancer innovation. Advances in the understanding tumour biology have enabled sophisticated diagnostics and predictive modelling to better characterize inguinal disease. Minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection is emerging as a technique that reduces morbidity while maintaining oncological safety. Furthermore, robust clinical trials are underway ,which will provide level one evidence to guide treatment decisions. Exciting advances in the field of immune-oncology offer promise as adjuvant therapies. International collaboration and centralisation of care will be essential to driving translational research and equitable evidence-based care.

SUMMARY

Improving outcomes for men with pSCC remains a global challenge. Radical inguinal lymph node dissection remains the gold standard for diagnosing and curing N1 disease. Although many promising developments are on the horizon, high-level evidence is required to guide therapy.

Wound Complication Rates after Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: Contemporary Analysis of the NSQIP Database

BACKGROUND

Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is used for diagnosis and treatment in penile cancer (PC), vulvar cancer (VC), and melanomas draining to the inguinal lymph nodes. However, ILND is often characterized by its morbidity and high wound complication rate. Consequently, we aimed to characterize wound complication rates after ILND.

STUDY DESIGN

The NSQIP database was queried for ILND performed from 2005 to 2018 for melanoma, PC, or VC. Thirty-day wound complications included wound disruption and superficial, deep, and organ-space surgical site infection. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with covariates, including cancer type, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3, BMI ≥30, smoking history, diabetes, operative time, and concomitant pelvic lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

A total of 1,099 patients had an ILND with 92, 115, and 892 ILNDs performed for PC, VC, and melanoma, respectively. Wound complications occurred in 161 (14.6%) patients, including 12 (13.0%), 17(14.8%), and 132 (14.8%) patients with PC, VC, and melanoma, respectively. Median length of stay was 1 day (interquartile range 0 to 3 days), and median operative time was 152 minutes (interquartile 83 to 192 minutes). Readmission rate was 12.7%. Wound complications were associated with longer operative time per 10 minutes (odds ratio 1.038, 95% CI 1.019 to 1.056, p < 0.001), BMI ≥30 (odds ratio 1.976, 95% CI 1.386 to 2.818, p < 0.001), and concomitant pelvic lymph node dissection (odds ratio 1.561, 95% CI 1.056 to 2.306, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Predictors of wound complications after ILND include BMI ≥30, longer operative time, and concomitant pelvic lymph node dissection. There have been efforts to decrease ILND complication rates, including minimally invasive techniques and modified templates, which are not captured by NSQIP, and such approaches may be considered especially for those with increased complication risks.

[A Case of Multiple Penile Schwannoma]

A 48-year-old man presented with a painless nodule on the right ventral aspect of the penile shaft root. The patient visited the hospital and complained that the mass was growing. On physical examinations, a 5 cm mass without tenderness was palpated. An isoechoic mass about 4 cm in size was observed on ultrasonography. Inhomogeneous high signal intensity was observed on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. A needle biopsy revealed schwannoma. During surgery for excision of the tumor, another small tumor was detected both tumors were resected. Both tumors were diagnosed as schwannoma by pathological examination. Out of 40 cases of penile schwannoma reported, eight were of multiple tumors. In our case, it was difficult to detect the other small tumor by preoperative diagnosis. Therefore, we recommend careful observation during surgery.

Effects of partial penectomy for penile cancer on sexual function: A systematic review

Penile cancer is a rare but debilitating condition, which often requires aggressive treatment. Partial penectomy is considered as a treatment option when a sufficient portion of the penile shaft can be maintained to preserve functionality. This systematic review, which followed the PRIMSA guidelines, aimed to evaluate the effects of partial penectomy for penile cancer on sexual function—the maintenance of which is often a priority in patient groups—and to identify potential factors which may moderate these effects. A systematic search of PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Open Grey as well as MEDLINE, CINAHL and Open Dissertations via EBSCOhost was conducted from inception through to 24^th March, 2022. Studies were required to include adults aged ≥18 years who had undergone partial penectomy for the treatment of penile cancer, with a quantitative measure of sexual function available pre- and post-surgery. Four eligible articles were identified for inclusion in this review, three of which reported a decrease in sexual function pre- to post-surgery across all domains of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire (erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction). Conversely, one study reported an increase in sexual function across IIEF domains, except for orgasmic function, which decreased, pre- to post-surgery. Greater penile length was associated with higher post-operative sexual function, whilst increasing age and higher anxiety levels were associated with lower post-operative sexual function levels in one study. Despite the overall drop in sexual function, many patients were still able to maintain satisfactory sex lives following partial penectomy. Given the limited research in this area and small sample sizes across studies, additional well-controlled investigations are warranted to provide further evidence on the effects of partial penectomy for penile cancer on sexual function.

Glansectomy and Reconstruction for Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review

Penile cancer (PeCa) is a rare disease, with a global incidence of 36068 new cases reported in the 2020 GLOBOCAN database. Narrower excision margins are now acceptable without compromising survival. Glansectomy is commonly performed for invasive PeCa confined to the glans penis. The majority of data on glansectomy are from small single-centre series. We provide a contemporary update on the outcomes of glansectomy via a systematic review of glansectomy for PeCa. Overall, 20 studies were included in the analysis. The local recurrence rate was 2.6-16.7%. The incidence of salvage penectomy for positive margins and/or recurrence was 1.2-8.3%. The disease-specific survival rate was 89-96.6%. A split-thickness skin graft was commonly used to reconstruct a neoglans and the graft loss rate was 1.5-23.5%. The incidence of meatal stenosis was 2.8-14.3%. Good cosmetic outcomes and normal erections were reported in 95-100% and 50-100% of cases, respectively. Glansectomy provides acceptable oncological control without significantly compromising functional outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: Penile cancer invading into the head of the penis can be surgically treated with a procedure called glansectomy that has good cancer control and cosmetic outcomes. In addition, penile length can be preserved, which allows men to urinate standing up and to achieve penetrative sexual intercourse.

Pelvic and inguinal single-site approach: PISA technique. New minimally invasive technique for lymph node dissection in penile cancer

OBJECTIVES

To describe our initial experience with a new minimally invasive inguinal and pelvic single-access laparoscopic approach, for performing lymph node dissection (LND) in penile cancer: the Pelvic and Inguinal Single Access (PISA) technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

10 patients with different penile squamous cell carcinoma stages (cN0 and ≥pT1G3 or cN1/cN2) were operated by means of the PISA technique, between 2015-2018. Intraoperative frozen section analysis was carried out routinely and if ≥2 inguinal nodes (pN2) or extracapsular nodal extension (pN3) are detected, ipsilateral pelvic LND was performed sequentially as a single-stage procedure and using the same surgical incisions.

VARIABLES

30-day PCs, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion rate, operative time, time to drainage removal, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Medians and ranges of values for selected variables were reported as descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Inguinal LND was bilateral in all cases, and pelvic LND was required in 40%. Total operative time was 120-170 min and median EBL was 66 (30-100) cc. No blood transfusion was required. No intraoperative complications were noted, and postoperative complications rate was 40% (10% major complications-symptomatic inguinal lymphocele). Median LOS was 5.8 (3-10) days. Median time to inguinal drain removal was 4.7 days. Mean number of lymph nodes removed by inguinal LND: 10.25 (8-14). Limited volume retrospective experience from a referral center with short follow-up. Outcomes reported may not be reproducible by surgeons with less experience and skills.

CONCLUSIONS

PISA is a novel, minimally invasive single-site surgical approach to one stage bilateral inguinal/pelvic LNDs for penile cancer showing a low rate of major complications.

[A Case of Laparoscopic Ileus Release for Intestinal Obstruction Due to Small Intestinal Metastasis Four Years after Penile Cancer Surgery]

We report a rare case of metastatic small intestine cancer originating from penile cancer triggered by intestinal obstruction, with some review of the literature. The case was a 78-year-old man at the first visit. Partial penile resection was performed for penile cancer. Histopathological findings were squamous cell carcinoma, and the surgical margin was negative. The stage at the time of the first surgery was T2N0M0, Stage Ⅱ. He came to the hospital with a complaint of abdominal pain 4 years after the operation. He was diagnosed with intestinal obstruction and was treated medically. He underwent medical treatment for 12 days, but did not improve, so he underwent laparoscopic ileus release. Surgical findings showed a neoplastic lesion in the abdominal cavity, and the site was obstructed, and partial resection of the small intestine including the neoplastic lesion was performed. Pathological examination revealed small intestinal metastasis of penile cancer. Postoperative intestinal obstruction improved and he was discharged without complications. After discharge, he underwent systemic chemotherapy at an outpatient clinic, but died of the primary disease 181 days after intestinal obstruction.

Penile amputation for sarcoma

Penile cancer is uncommon among other urological malignancies, squamous cell carcinoma being the most common type of penile cancer. This case report presents a patient with rapidly progressive angiosarcoma who underwent penile amputation.

Development of Incidence and Surgical Treatment of Penile Cancer in Germany from 2006 to 2016: Potential Implications for Future Management

BACKGROUND

Penile cancer is a rare disease and surgical treatment often entails a significant impact on quality of life. The aim of this study was to analyze trends in surgical treatment patterns in Germany.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the nationwide German hospital billing database and the German cancer registry from 2006 to 2016. All penile cancer cases with penile surgery or lymph node dissection (LND) were included. We also analyzed the distribution of cases, extent of surgery, and length of hospital stay, stratified for annual caseload. The geographical distribution of centers for 2016 was presented.

RESULTS

During the investigated timespan, tumor incidences increased from 748 to 971 (p = 0.001). We identified 11,353 penile surgery cases, increasing from 886 to 1196 (p < 0.001), and 5173 cases of LND, increasing from 332 to 590 (p < 0.001). Cases of partial amputation increased from 45.8 to 53.8% (p < 0.001), while total amputation remained stable at 11.2%. Caseload in high-volume hospitals increased from 9.0 to 18.8% for penile surgery (p < 0.001) and from 0 to 13.1% for LND (p < 0.001). The increase in LND caseload was caused by an increase in inguinal LND, from 297 to 505 (p < 0.001), with increasing sentinel LND, from 14.2 to 21.9% (p = 0.098). The assessment of geographical distribution of cases in Germany revealed extensive areas without sufficient coverage by experienced centers.

CONCLUSIONS

We saw consistent increases in penile surgery and LND, with a growing number of cases in high-volume hospitals, and, accordingly, an increase in tumor incidence. The increasing use of inguinal LND and organ-preserving surgery reflect the adaptation of current guidelines; however, geographical distribution of experienced centers could be improved.

Use of flaps in inguinal lymphadenectomy in metastatic penile cancer

PURPOSE

Reviewing surgical procedures using fasciocutaneous and myocutaneous flaps for inguinal reconstruction after lymphadenectomy in metastatic penile cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed the current literature of the Pubmed database according to PRISMA guidelines. The search terms used were "advanced penile cancer", "groin reconstruction", and "inguinal reconstruction", both alone and in combination. The bibliographic references used in the selected articles were also analyzed to include recent articles into our research.

RESULTS

A total of 54 studies were included in this review. About one third of penile cancers are diagnosed with locally advanced disease, often presenting with large lymph node involvement. Defects in the inguinal region resulting from the treatment of metastatic penile cancer are challenging for the surgeon and cause high patient morbidity, rendering primary closure unfeasible. Several fasciocutaneous and myocutaneous flaps of the abdomen and thigh can be used for the reconstruction of the inguinal region, transferring tissue to the affected area, and enabling tensionless closure.

CONCLUSIONS

The reconstruction of defects in the inguinal region with the aid of flaps allows for faster postoperative recovery and reduces the risk of complications. Thus, the patient will be able to undergo potential necessary adjuvant treatments sooner.