Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome in two young children: the importance of an early diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a serious life-treating condition characterized by skin eruption, fever, haematologic abnormalities, and multi-organ involvement that can be fatal if unrecognized, especially in patients with liver failure. Diagnosis may be difficult because it is rarely described in children and can mimic many different conditions.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report two cases of DRESS syndrome due to prolonged antibiotic treatment in young children in whom recovery occurred following different therapeutic approaches. A previously healthy 5-year-old boy had been receiving intravenous vancomycin for right wrist and left elbow osteomyelitis and developed DRESS syndrome on day 30. The patient achieved a complete resolution of all symptoms with pulse methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone. A 4-year-old girl with cystic fibrosis, pancreatic insufficiency, chronic pulmonary colonization by Gram-positive bacteria admitted for pulmonary exacerbation was treated with intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam and tobramycin. After 14 days of treatment, she developed DRESS syndrome: antibiotic treatment was therefore stopped, and without any further therapy, a progressive resolution of the patient's clinical features was observed within 7 days, while the normalization of laboratory abnormalities was achieved at 14 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our cases highlight that paediatricians should be aware of the clinical presentations of and therapeutic approaches for DRESS syndrome, especially in children receiving long-term antibiotic treatment. The removal of the offending drug is crucial and may be the only life-saving measure. In more aggressive cases, corticosteroid or other immunosuppressive drugs should be considered to achieve the best outcome.

Generalized fixed drug eruption to piperacillin/tazobactam and review of literature

Fixed drug eruption (FDE) is an adverse drug reaction characterized by the development of well-circumscribed, round, dusky erythematous macules and plaques on cutaneous or mucosal surfaces. The reaction occurs on the same mucosal or cutaneous site with subsequent exposures to the offending drug. Although FDE usually manifests as a single lesion, in rare instances, more than one lesion may arise and this is referred to as a generalized eruption. Herein, we present a 31year-old man with history of cystic fibrosis who developed a generalized fixed drug eruption to piperacillin/tazobactam (Zosyn, Pfizer). We discuss our patient's course and review causes and outcomes of generalized fixed drug eruptions in the literature.

Effect of Meropenem-Vaborbactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam on Clinical Cure or Improvement and Microbial Eradication in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection: The TANGO I Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Meropenem-vaborbactam is a combination carbapenem/beta-lactamase inhibitor and a potential treatment for severe drug-resistant gram-negative infections.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and adverse events of meropenem-vaborbactam in complicated urinary tract infection (UTI), including acute pyelonephritis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Phase 3, multicenter, multinational, randomized clinical trial (TANGO I) conducted November 2014 to April 2016 and enrolling patients (≥18 years) with complicated UTI, stratified by infection type and geographic region.

INTERVENTIONS

Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive meropenem-vaborbactam (2g/2g over 3 hours; n = 274) or piperacillin-tazobactam (4g/0.5g over 30 minutes; n = 276) every 8 hours. After 15 or more doses, patients could be switched to oral levofloxacin if they met prespecified criteria for improvement, to complete 10 days of total treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary end point for FDA criteria was overall success (clinical cure or improvement and microbial eradication composite) at end of intravenous treatment in the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Primary end point for European Medicines Agency (EMA) criteria was microbial eradication at test-of-cure visit in the microbiologic modified ITT and microbiologic evaluable populations. Prespecified noninferiority margin was -15%. Because the protocol prespecified superiority testing in the event of noninferiority, 2-sided 95% CIs were calculated.

RESULTS

Among 550 patients randomized, 545 received study drug (mean age, 52.8 years; 361 [66.2%] women; 374 [68.6%] in the microbiologic modified ITT population; 347 [63.7%] in the microbiologic evaluable population; 508 [93.2%] completed the trial). For the FDA primary end point, overall success occurred in 189 of 192 (98.4%) with meropenem-vaborbactam vs 171 of 182 (94.0%) with piperacillin-tazobactam (difference, 4.5% [95% CI, 0.7% to 9.1%]; P < .001 for noninferiority). For the EMA primary end point, microbial eradication in the microbiologic modified ITT population occurred in 128 of 192 (66.7%) with meropenem-vaborbactam vs 105 of 182 (57.7%) with piperacillin-tazobactam (difference, 9.0% [95% CI, -0.9% to 18.7%]; P < .001 for noninferiority); microbial eradication in the microbiologic evaluable population occurred in 118 of 178 (66.3%) vs 102 of 169 (60.4%) (difference, 5.9% [95% CI, -4.2% to 16.0%]; P < .001 for noninferiority). Adverse events were reported in 106 of 272 (39.0%) with meropenem-vaborbactam vs 97 of 273 (35.5%) with piperacillin-tazobactam.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with complicated UTI, including acute pyelonephritis and growth of a baseline pathogen, meropenem-vaborbactam vs piperacillin-tazobactam resulted in a composite outcome of complete resolution or improvement of symptoms along with microbial eradication that met the noninferiority criterion. Further research is needed to understand the spectrum of patients in whom meropenem-vaborbactam offers a clinical advantage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02166476.

Use of Population Pharmacokinetics and Electronic Health Records to Assess Piperacillin-Tazobactam Safety in Infants

BACKGROUND

Piperacillin, in combination with tazobactam, is frequently used in infants for treating nosocomial infections, although safety data in this population are limited. Electronic health record (EHR) data can be used to evaluate drug safety in infants, but measures of drug exposure are lacking.

METHODS

To relate simulated piperacillin exposure with adverse events (AEs) in infants using EHR data, we identified infants discharged from 333 neonatal intensive care units managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group between 1997 and 2012. Using a previously published population pharmacokinetic model in the target population, we simulated piperacillin steady state area under the concentration versus time curve from zero to τ (AUCss,0-τ) and steady state maximal drug concentration (Cmaxss). Next, we used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between simulated AUCss,0-τ and Cmaxss with clinical AEs (seizure and rash) and laboratory AEs controlling for gestational age. The odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) comparing the third versus the first tertiles for AUCss,0-τ and Cmaxss were reported.

RESULTS

We identified 746 infants with a median (interquartile range) gestational age of 30 weeks (26-33) and postnatal age of 11 days (6-25). The median (interquartile range) piperacillin dose was 225 mg/kg/d (176-300). No significant associations were found between simulated piperacillin exposure (AUCss,0-τ and Cmaxss) and clinical and laboratory AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no associations between predicted piperacillin exposures and the occurrence of AEs. This study confirms the feasibility of using population pharmacokinetics and EHR to relate drug exposure with safety.

Continuous versus intermittent piperacillin/tazobactam infusion in infection due to or suspected pseudomonas aeruginosa

BACKGROUND

There is lack of information on the efficacy and safety of piperacillin–tazobactam administered by continuous infusion.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether continuous infusion of piperacillin–tazobactam is superior in terms of efficacy to a 30 % higher dose administered by intermittent infusion to treat suspected or confirmed infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Setting Multicenter clinical trial with 11 third level Spanish hospitals.

METHOD

Randomized, double-blind parallel-group clinical trial, controlled by conventional administration of the drug. Patients randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive piperacillin–tazobactam as continuous infusion (CI) or intermittent (II).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Primary efficacy endpoint was percentage of patients having a satisfactory clinical response at completion of treatment, defined as clinical cure or clinical improvement. Adverse events were reported. Results 78 patients were included, 40 in the CI group and 38 in the II group. Mean (standard deviation) duration of treatment was 7 (±4.44) days. 58 patients (74.4 %) experienced cure or improvement at the end of the treatment. There were no statistical differences in cure rates between the two treatment arms and no adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Continuous infusion of piperacillin–tazobactam is an alternative administration drug method at least similar in efficacy and safety to conventional intermittent infusion. Multivariate analysis is needed to determine whether continuous administration might be more beneficial than intermittent in certain patient subgroups.

Is high-dose β-lactam therapy associated with excessive drug toxicity in critically ill patients?

BACKGROUND

β-lactam antibiotics may necessitate higher than licensed drug doses to achieve therapeutic exposures in critically ill patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring can be used to guide dosing so as to maximise therapeutic effect whilst reducing the likelihood of exposure-related toxicity.

METHODS

A retrospective review of critically ill patients identified those that received higher than licensed doses of either meropenem (3-6 g/day) or piperacillin-tazobactam (16 g-2 g/day) (i.e. high-dose group) guided by therapeutic drug monitoring. β-lactam-associated toxicities were compared with a patient group of similar age, sex, body mass index and admission diagnosis that received licensed doses of either antibiotic.

RESULTS

Mean daily doses were more than 40% higher in the high-dose groups for each antibiotic. There were no significant differences between the high-dose and licensed-dose groups in terms of hepatocellular derangement (17.9% vs. 31.8%, P=0.25 for meropenem and 17.4% vs. 16.0%, P=0.90 for piperacillin-tazobactam), cholestasis (28.0% vs. 13.6%, P=0.32 for meropenem and 13.0% vs. 4.0%, P=0.26 for piperacillin-tazobactam), need for continuous renal replacement therapy (0% vs. 9.1%, P=0.10 for meropenem and 0% vs. 8.0%, P=0.16 for piperacillin-tazobactam), seizure incidence (7.1% vs. 4.5%, P=0.70 for meropenem and nil for either piperacillin-tazobactam group), thrombocytopenia (9.1% vs. 10.7%, P=0.85 for meropenem and 4.0% vs. 4.3% for piperacillin-tazobactam), or neutropenia (4.5% vs. 3.6%, P=0.95 for meropenem and 0.0% vs. 4.3% for piperacillin-tazobactam).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher than licensed doses of meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam guided by therapeutic drug monitoring were not associated with additional toxicities. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm the clinical utility of higher than licensed dosing.

Bile cast nephropathy: A case report and review of the literature

Bile cast nephropathy is a condition of renal dysfunction in the setting of hyperbilirubinemia. There are very few cases of this condition reported in the last decade and a lack of established treatment guidelines. While the exact etiology remains unknown, bile cast nephropathy is presumed to be secondary to multiple concurrent insults to the kidney including direct toxicity from bile acids, obstructive physiology from bile casts, and systemic hypoperfusion from vasodilation. Therapy directed at bilirubin reduction may improve renal function, but will likely need dialysis or plasmapheresis as well. We report our case of bile cast nephropathy and the therapeutic measures undertaken in a middle-aged male with chronic renal insufficiency that developed hyperbilirubinemia and drug-induced liver injury secondary to antibiotic use. He developed acute renal injury in the setting of rising bilirubin. He subsequently had a progressive decline in renal and hepatic function, requiring dialysis and plasmapheresis with some improvement, ultimately requiring transplantation.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam Induced Interstitial Nephritis, Hepatitis and Serum Sckness-Like Illness

OBJECTIVE

To describe a patient who developed acute interstitial nephritis, hepatitis and serum sickness-like syndrome after receiving piperacillin-tazobactam (zosyn) therapy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 30-year-old woman received a 7-day course of piperacillin-tazobactam as empiric treatment for pneumonia. The patient's kidney function worsened and she turned anuric needing dialysis. She also developed fever and a rash. Laboratory analysis showed elevated liver function and leukocytosis. Kidney biopsy showed acute interstitial nephritis. The patient responded well to steroids; white blood cell count normalized and her liver and kidney function improved over a period of one month.

DISCUSSION

Piperacillin-tazobactam is one of the most commonly used antibiotics in the hospital setting. It has rarely been associated with acute interstitial nephritis, hepatic injury, or serum sickness-like reactions. Steroids have improved the outcome in most of the cases of interstitial nephritis.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be aware of piperacillin-tazobactam as a drug capable of causing interstitial nephritis, hepatitis and serum sickness-like syndrome. It is essential that we monitor for these rare but severe complications.

Bloodstream infections in neutropenic cancer patients: A practical update

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are among the most frequent complications in neutropenic cancer patients and, if caused by Gram-negative rods, are associated with high mortality. Thus, fever during neutropenia warrants prompt empirical antibiotic therapy which should be active against the most frequent Gram-negatives. In the last decade, there has been a worldwide increase in multidrug resistant (MDR) strains. In these cases, the traditional choices such as oral therapy, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, or even carbapenems, might be ineffective. Therefore novel de-escalation approach has been proposed for patients who are at high risk for infections due to MDR bacteria. It consists of starting antibiotics which cover the most probable resistant strain but it is narrowed down after 72 hours if no MDR pathogen is isolated. With increasing bacterial resistance, the benefit of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis during prolonged neutropenia remains to be confirmed. Antibiotic stewardship and infection control programs are mandatory in every cancer center.

A comparison of the efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam therapies in the empirical treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia

OBJECTIVE

Empirical antibiotic therapy in neutropenic patients presenting with fever plays a significant role in reducing mortality related to infection. Empirical therapies with broad-spectrum intravenous bactericidal, anti-pseudomonal antibiotics are accepted treatments for febrile neutropenic patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZO) and cefoperozone-sulbactam (CS) therapies in adult patients with haematological malignancies presenting with neutropenic fever in a prospective study design.

METHODS

Patients with haematological malignancies (leukaemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and myelodysplastic syndrome) were recruited from June 2010-May 2013. Participants were over 18 years old, with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of less than 500/mm³ following chemotherapy or expected to have an ANC less than 500/mm³ in the first 48 h post-chemotherapy, and with an oral body temperature ≥ 38.3°C at a single measurement or 38.0°C after 1-h monitoring. Patients were randomised to the two treatment groups. The initial empirical therapy comprised PIP-TAZO (4.5 g/6 h/day, IV) and CS (2 g/8 h/day, IV).

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 61% with CS and 49% with PIP-TAZO (p =0.247). Factors affecting the treatment success included a neutrophil count <100/mm3, being in the relapse/refractory stage of malignancy, and the presence of a microbiologically documented infection (p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PIP-TAZO and CS monotherapies are equally effective and safe for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.

Drug Fever Induced by Piperacillin/Tazobactam in a Scoliosis Patient: A Case Report

Drug fever is frequently underrecognized by clinicians despite its common occurrence. Fever induced by piperacillin/tazobactam has not been reported in scoliosis correction surgery.Drug fever caused by piperacillin/tazobactam in a scoliosis patient was described.A 36-year-old woman with adult scoliosis undergoing correction surgery was reported. She developed a fever after an intake of piperacillin/tazobactam for 3 days. Eosinophil count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive proteins were increased in her blood examination. Thorough history, chest radiography, blood cultures, physical examination, and urinalysis revealed no evidences of fever. A drug fever is therefore considered. The fever lasted for 2 weeks and her body temperature come back to normal 4 days after piperacillin/tazobactam cessation.Fever could be caused by piperacillin/tazobactam. The drug fever's diagnosis is easily confounded by a co-occurring infection. Therefore, it is crucial for clinicians to doubt drugs as a reason when no other origin of fever could be identified in a patient.

Clinical outcomes with alternative dosing strategies for piperacillin/tazobactam: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

A better dosing strategy can improve clinical outcomes for patients. We sought to compare the extended or continuous infusion with conventional intermittent infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam, investigating which approach is better and worthy of recommendation for clinical use.

Methods

Articles were gathered from PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, Science Direct, Cochrane, two Chinese literature databases (CNKI, Wan Fang Data) and related ICAAC and ACCP conferences. Randomized controlled and observational studies that compared extended or continuous infusion with conventional intermittent infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam were identified from the databases above and analyzed. Two reviewers independently extracted and investigated the data. A meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.2 software. The quality of each study was assessed. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were evaluated.

Results

Five randomized controlled trials and nine observational studies were included in this study. All included studies had high quality and no publication bias was found. Compared to the conventional intermittent infusion approach, the extended or continuous infusion group had a significantly higher clinical cure rate (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.29-2.73, P = 0.0009) and a lower mortality rate (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.89, P = 0.005). No statistical difference was observed for bacteriologic cure (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.82-2.37, P = 0.22) between the two dosing regimens. The sensitivity analysis showed the results were stable.

Conclusions

Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that the extended or continuous infusion strategy of piperacillin/tazobactam should be recommended for clinical use considering its higher clinical cure rate and lower mortality rate in comparison with conventional intermittent strategy. Data from this study could be extrapolated for other β-lactam antimicrobials. Therefore, this dosing strategy could be considered in clinical practice.

Drugs that have been shown to cause drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia or positive direct antiglobulin tests: some interesting findings since 2007

This review updates new findings in drug-induced immune- hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) since the 2007 review in Immunohematology by these authors. Twelve additional drugs have been added to the three tables listing drugs associated with drug-dependent antibodies, drugs associated with drug-independent antibodies, and drugs associated with nonimmunologic protein adsorption. Other updated findings include (1) piperacillin is currently the most commonly encountered cause of DIIHA, (2) new data on blood group specificity of drug-dependent antibodies, (3) drug-dependent antibodies detected in healthy donors, (4) DIIHA associated with transplantation, and(5) DIIHA associated with chemotherapeutic drugs.

Piperacillin-induced DRESS: distinguishing features observed in a clinical and allergy study of 8 patients

BACKGROUND

DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome is characterized by fever, rash, eosinophilia, and multiorgan failure. Previous reports have described differences in clinical and laboratory findings of DRESS syndrome depending on the inducing drug. Piperacillin has been reported as the drug responsible for this syndrome in 3 patients.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze and describe the clinical, laboratory, and allergy study findings of piperacillin-induced DRESS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with DRESS associated with piperacillin-tazobactam (Pip/Taz) according to the Kardaun diagnostic score criteria. Assessment of causality was established using the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System and the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT). The allergy study included skin and epicutaneous tests.

RESULTS

Eight patients were diagnosed with DRESS due to Pip/Taz (3 probable and 5 definite cases). Skin rash was observed in all cases and facial edema in 50%; the mean latency period was 18 days. Fever was present in 7 patients. Liver and kidney injuries were detected in 6 and 3 patients, respectively. All patients had eosinophilia and a full recovery. The LTT to Pip/Taz was strongly positive in all patients, with a stimulation index of over 6. Three of 3 patients had a positive intradermal test to Pip/Taz, and 1 of 4 had a positive patch test. All patients had a negative LTT to carbapenems.

CONCLUSIONS

We have reported on the first case series of piperacillin-induced DRESS. A latency period of 18 days, skin rash, eosinophilia, fever, liver injury, and good prognosis were the most common features. The allergy study, and the LTT in particular, was highly useful for identifying Pip/Taz as the culprit drug and piperacillin as the responsible active ingredient.

[A clinical case of occupational allergy to piperacilline. A novel diagnostic method: basophil activation test (BAT)]

BACKGROUND

Piperacillin, unlike other antibiotics, rarely causes immediate allergic reactions. Only two cases related to occupational exposure are reported in the literature.

OBJECTIVES

Adoption of new methods for diagnosis of occupational allergy to drugs.

METHODS

An atopic nurse, aged 30 years, was referred to our hospital for an allergic work-related reaction to piperacillin. The patient had suffered two successive episodes with immediate cutaneous reaction, angioedema and dyspnoea after preparing piperacillin. Almost four years previously she had suffered from similar symptoms after taking amoxicillin. She was submitted to a clinical examination and a routine allergic test, performing also specific IgE (Phadia Pharmacia ImmunoCap) and BAT (Basophil Activation Test) for Beta-lactam antibiotics.

RESULTS

A positive response to piperacillin was observed in our case using BAT a new non-invasive and safe method, that proved useful for diagnosis of allergy. Moreover, we observed a change from an allergic reaction for therapeutic use of amoxicillin to a work-related adverse reaction to another beta-lactam, piperacillin.

CONCLUSIONS

In previous clinical cases cutaneous and specific challenge tests were performed for diagnosis. At present, availability of an in vitro test, such as BAT may provide new diagnostic opportunities, and a useful tool for studying clinical cases other than, in perspective, monitoring exposed workers. Preventive measures were taken in the workplace to lower the risk of sensitization and allergic response. The nurse was transferred to a well controlled job.

Alternative diagnosis to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in two critically ill patients despite a positive PF4/heparin-antibody test

Thrombocytopenia can cause diagnostic challenges in patients who have received heparin. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is often considered in the differential diagnosis, and a positive screening can be mistaken as confirmation of the disorder. We present two patients who both received low-molecular-weight heparin for several days. In the first patient, clinical judgment rejected the suspicion of HIT despite a positive screening assay, and treatment for the alternative diagnosis of post-transfusion purpura was correctly initiated. In the second patient, the inaccurate diagnosis HIT was pursued due to a positive screening assay, while the alternative diagnosis of drug-dependent thrombocytopenia caused by piperacillin/tazobactam was rejected. This resulted in re-exposure to piperacillin/tazobactam which caused a second episode of severe thrombocytopenia. A positive screening assay for platelet factor 4/heparin-antibody should be verified by a functional assay, especially in patients with low pretest probability for HIT.

Safety Evaluation of Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Very Low Birth Weight Infants

An open, non-comparative study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerance of parenteral piperacillin/tazobactam in very low birth weight infants. Twenty-seven patients were included for nosocomial sepsis with gram-negative bacteria (n = 4), nosocomial sepsis not responding to the empirical antibiotic regimen (n = 3), suspected necrotizing enterocolitis (n = 17), and infection after abdominal surgery for reasons other than necrotizing enterocolitis (n = 3). No clinical adverse events considered related to the study drug were noted, in particular, no cases of phlebitis, rash or stool changes. Several possibly related, mild and transitory abnormalities of laboratory parameters were observed. No long-lasting effect on the intestinal flora was detected. Seventeen patients (63%) were considered to have a favorable clinical response. This study demonstrates that piperacillin/tazobactam is a safe and well tolerated drug for preterm infants with bacterial infections, particularly those involving the gastrointestinal tract. Comparative clinical trials are warranted to further clarify the microbiological efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam in this particular patient population.

Piperacillin-tazobactam as a cost effective monotherapy in febrile neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Fever in neutropenic patient is a medical emergency. Timely intervention with antibiotics has been demonstrated to be effective. We assessed Piperacillin-Tazobactem as a cost effective mono-therapy in solid malignancy patients in our institution in relation to dual antibiotic therapy and other monotherapies.

METHODS

This study was conducted to determine the efficacy, and cost effectiveness of Piperacillin-Tazobactem as monotherapy in febrile neutropenia. Total 150 patients with chemotherapy induced febrile neutropenia were selected. Piperacillin-Tazobactem was given intravenously 4500 mg every 6 hour. Outcome was assessed as success and failure. Success was defined as afebrile for four consecutive days, clearance of signs of infection, no new cultures, and no recurrence of primary infection after completion of therapy. Failure was defined as modification or addition of antibiotic due to clinical deterioration, cultured organism resistant to Piperacillin-Tazobactem and Death.

RESULTS

The mean age was 43 years, 31% males and 69% were females. Out of total 150 patients, 73 patients were of breast carcinoma. There were 143 patients with negative blood cultures, and 7 patients with positive blood cultures, out of which 3 patients were resistant to Piperacillin-Tazobactem. Success was achieved in 83.3% of total patients. Daily cost of Piperacillin-Tazobactem was much less in relation to other monotherapies and dual antibiotic therapy including Gentamicin. None of the patient had adverse effects of Piperacillin-Tazobactem.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that Piperacillin-Tazobactem is a safe, well tolerated as well as cost effective monotherapy in patient with febrile neutropenia with solid cancers. Only two percent organisms were resistant to Pipercillin-Tazobactam.

Effectiveness and safety of generic formulation of piperacillin/tazobactam (Astaz-P) for treatment of infected patients at Siriraj Hospital

OBJECTIVE

To determine effectiveness and safety of generic piperacillin/tazobactam (Astaz-P) that has been available as a substitute for original piperacillin/tazobactam (Tazocin) in Siriraj Hospital since October 2011.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Medical records of hospitalized adult patients who received piperacillin/tazobactam for at least 48 hours from January 2011 to June 2012 were reviewed. The data on demographics, clinical features of infections, antibiotic treatments, clinical courses and outcomes of the patients who received original piperacillin/tazobactam and generic piperacillin/ tazobactam were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The medical records of 300 patients who received original piperacillin/tazobactam and 300 patients who received generic piperacillin/tazobactam were included. The characteristics of the patients and clinical and microbiological features of infections of the patients in both groups were not significantly different. Overall favorable clinical outcome and overall mortality were comparable between generic and original groups (74.0% vs. 74.7%, p = 0.93; 18.3% vs. 18.0%, p = 1.00, respectively). No significant difference of adverse effect was found between two groups. The non-inferiority test indicated that the clinical outcome and overall mortality of the patients who received generic piperacillin/tazobactam were not inferior to those who received original piperacillin/tazobactam (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Generic piperacillin/tazobactam (Astaz-P) was not inferior to original piperacillin/tazobactam (Tazocin) for therapy of infections in the hospitalized patients at Siriraj Hospital.

[Efficacy and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam for febrile neutropenic patients in Japan]

The IDSA guideline for management of febrile neutropenic patients updated in 2010 recommends monotherapy with anti-pseudomonal-lactam agents, including piperacillin-tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) for high-risk patients. However, clinical studies of PIPC/TAZ are limited in Japanese patients. In this study, we conducted an open-labeled non-randomized prospective trial to examine the efficacy and safety of PIPC/TAZ as an empirical treatment for Japanese patients with febrile neutropenia. Forty-nine febrile episodes in neutropenic patients excluding those undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (high risk 36, low risk 13) were analyzed. The overall response rate was 71%, and no significant differences between the high-risk and the low-risk group were observed (high risk 72%, low risk 69%). Neither PS nor usage of G-CSF affected the response rate. No major side effects were observed in the study. The efficacy and the safety profile of PIPC/TAZ treatment were comparable to those in other previous Western studies. In conclusion, this study suggests PIPC/TAZ is effective and well tolerated as an initial empirical treatment for febrile neutropenic Japanese patients.