Evidence-Based Practice Recommendations to Prevent/Manage Post-Lumbar Puncture Headaches in Pediatric Patients Receiving Intrathecal Chemotherapy

Post-lumbar puncture headaches (PLPHs) are a known complication of lumbar puncture procedures. Children undergoing treatment for cancer often undergo multiple lumbar punctures, placing them at increased risk for PLPHs. There are currently no guidelines for the prevention or management of PLPHs in children. A team was therefore assembled to conduct a systematic review of the evidence in relationship to PLPHs in the pediatric population. Clinical questions were developed and used to guide the literature review. Twenty-four articles were deemed appropriate for use and were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Based on the review of evidence, strong recommendations are made for the use of smaller needle sizes and for the use of pencil point needles during lumbar puncture procedures. Weak recommendations are made for needle orientation and positioning following the procedure as well as for interventions used to treat PLPHs once they occur. There is a need for additional, pediatric-specific studies to further examine the issue of PLPH prevention and treatment.

WITHDRAWN: Epidural blood patching for preventing and treating post-dural puncture headache

This review is out of date, and the original authors are no longer available to update it.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Can the incidence of accidental dural puncture in laboring women be reduced? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Accidental dural puncture (ADP) after epidural analgesia (EDA) for labor pain may cause severe postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and may prolong hospital stay. We aimed to identify techniques that reduce the incidence of ADP.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed. Data on the occurrence of ADP and PDPH were extracted and subjected to meta-analysis. The random effects model was applied. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 54 articles, 13 non-randomized controlled trials and 41 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), reporting on a total of 98,869 patients. In non-RCTs, the use of liquid for the identification of the epidural space was associated with a reduced risk of ADP compared to the use of air (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.79, P=0.001). In our analysis of RCTs this comparison did not produce a significant difference. No effect was found for combined spinal-epidural analgesia, maternal position, type of the catheter, needle size, bevel direction, operator experience, or use of ultrasound.

CONCLUSION

A reduction of the risk of ADP was found for liquid use for the loss of resistance, but only in lower quality studies. Based on current evidence, we cannot make a recommendation regarding any of the techniques under study. Therefore, clinicians should focus on measures to prevent or treat PDPH once ADP has occurred.

High quality labour analgesia using small gauge epidural needles and catheters

PURPOSE

Inadvertent epidural needle punctures represent the leading cause of severe postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients. Use of small gauge (G) epidural needles for continuous analgesia has received little attention despite possible important reductions in PDPH. We report the first study to examine the feasibility of using small G Tuohy needles and 23 G catheters for labour analgesia.

METHODS

Healthy parturients <or= 6 cm dilated were recruited. Epidural analgesia was established using a 19 G Tuohy epidural needle, a 23 G single port 40 cm catheter and bupivacaine 0.08% with fentanyl 2 microg x mL(-1) (15-20 mL). Breakthrough pain was treated by protocol. There was no formal in-training period for anesthesiologists. The primary outcome was the combined failure rate for initiation (failed needle/catheter placement or failed block <or= 30 min of drug administration). Secondary out-comes included late block failure (> 30 min), recognized dural puncture, PDPH, patient assessment of analgesia within 24 hr of delivery, complications and anesthesiologist satisfaction.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven parturients were recruited. Successful blocks were initiated and maintained in 24/27 who rated overall analgesia from good to excellent (19/24 very good to excellent). Three block failures occurred at the initiation phase only (two unilateral, one absent). There was no evidence of catheter kinking after placement. One patient developed PDPH after unrecognized dural puncture which was self-treated with acetaminophen for four days, followed by complete symptom resolution.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to provide high quality labour analgesia using small G epidural needles and catheters. The effect of small G epidural needles on PDPH warrants future study.

Injection of intrathecal normal saline in decreasing postdural puncture headache

PURPOSE

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is the most common and still unresolved postoperative complication of spinal anesthesia. Although there are several positive results of intrathecal saline injection for the treatment of PDPH and prophylaxis after accidental dural puncture, the effect of deliberate intrathecal saline injection before spinal anesthesia has not been examined. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of prophylactic administration of intrathecal normal saline in decreasing PDPH.

METHODS

One hundred healthy women (ASA physical status I) of age between 18 and 35 years scheduled for elective term cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were included. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group C received 2.5 ml (12.5 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % as a control, and group S received intrathecal normal saline 5 ml before intrathecal injection of 2.5 ml (12.5 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. The incidence and severity of PDPH were assessed after 48 h and again 3-7 days after operation.

RESULTS

Basal characteristics were statistically similar in both groups (P > 0.05). The incidences of moderate and severe PDPH during first postoperative 48 h were not different between the groups (P = 0.24). However, the frequency of PDPH after 3-7 days was statistically higher in group C in compared with group S (16 vs. 2 %, P = 0.03). Totally the frequency of PDPH was higher in group C (24 vs. 2%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Administration of normal saline (5 ml) before intrathecal administration of hyperbaric bupivacaine as a preventive approach is an effective and simple way to minimize PDPH in patients undergoing cesarean section.

Posture and fluids for preventing post-dural puncture headache

BACKGROUND

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication of lumbar punctures. Several theories have identified the leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the hole in the dura as a cause of this side effect. Therefore, it is necessary to take preventive measures to avoid this complication. Prolonged bed rest has been used as a therapeutic measure once PDPH has started, but it is unknown if it can be also be used to prevent it. Similarly, the value of administering fluids additional to those of normal dietary intake to restore the loss of CSF produced by the puncture is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether prolonged bed rest combined with different body and head positions, as well as administration of supplementary fluids after lumbar puncture, prevent the onset of PDPH in people undergoing lumbar puncture for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS up to June 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of bed rest versus early/immediate mobilization, head-down tilt versus horizontal position, prone versus supine positions during bed rest, and administration of supplementary fluids versus no/less supplementation, as prevention measures for PDPH in people who have undergone lumbar puncture.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the studies for eligibility through the web-based software EROS (Early Review Organizing Software). Two different review authors independently assessed risk of bias using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We solved any disagreements by consensus. We extracted data on cases of PDPH, severe PDPH, and any headache after lumbar puncture and performed intention-to-treat analyses and sensitivity analyses by risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 23 trials (2477 participants) in this review. There was no beneficial effect associated with bed rest compared with immediate mobilization on the incidence of PDPH (risk for bed rest 26.4%; risk for mobilization 20.5%; risk ratio (RR) 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09 to 1.55), severe PDPH (risk for bed rest 10.6%; risk for mobilization 10.7%; RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.32), and presence of any headache after lumbar puncture (risk for bed rest 33.6%; risk for mobilization 28.6%; RR 1.18; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.32). Analyses restricted to the most methodologically rigorous trials gave similar results. Likewise, the two trials that assessed fluid supplementation did not find this preventive measure to be useful in the prevention of PDPH.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from RCTs that suggests that routine bed rest after dural puncture is beneficial for the prevention of PDPH onset. The role of fluid supplementation in the prevention of PDPH remains unclear.

Drug therapy for preventing post-dural puncture headache

BACKGROUND

Post-dural (post-lumbar or post-spinal) puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most common complications of diagnostic, therapeutic or inadvertent lumbar punctures. Many drug options have been used to prevent headache in clinical practice and have also been tested in some clinical studies, but there are still some uncertainties about their clinical effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of drugs for preventing PDPH in adults and children.

SEARCH METHODS

The search strategy included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 5), MEDLINE (from 1950 to May 2012), EMBASE (from 1980 to May 2012) and CINAHL (from 1982 to June 2012). There was no language restriction.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effectiveness of any drug used for preventing PDPH.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Review authors independently selected studies, assessed risks of bias and extracted data. We estimated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. We calculated a 95% confidence interval (CI) for each RR and MD. We did not undertake meta-analysis because participants' characteristics or assessed doses of drugs were too different in the included studies. We performed an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 RCTs (1611 participants) in this review with a majority of women (72%), mostly parturients (women in labour) (913), after a lumbar puncture for regional anaesthesia. Drugs assessed were epidural and spinal morphine, spinal fentanyl, oral caffeine, rectal indomethacin, intravenous cosyntropin, intravenous aminophylline and intravenous dexamethasone.All the included RCTs reported data on the primary outcome, i.e. the number of participants affected by PDPH of any severity after a lumbar puncture. Epidural morphine and intravenous cosyntropin reduced the number of participants affected by PDPH of any severity after a lumbar puncture when compared to placebo. Also, intravenous aminophylline reduced the number of participants affected by PDPH of any severity after a lumbar puncture when compared to no intervention, while intravenous dexamethasone increased it. Spinal morphine increased the number of participants affected by pruritus when compared to placebo, and epidural morphine increased the number of participants affected by nausea and vomiting when compared to placebo. Oral caffeine increased the number of participants affected by insomnia when compared to placebo.The remainder of the interventions analysed did not show any relevant effect for any of the outcomes.None of the included RCTs reported the number of days that patients stayed in hospital.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Morphine and cosyntropin have shown effectiveness for reducing the number of participants affected by PDPH of any severity after a lumbar puncture, when compared to placebo, especially in patients with high risk of PDPH, such as obstetric patients who have had an inadvertent dural puncture. Aminophylline also reduced the number of participants affected by PDPH of any severity after a lumbar puncture when compared to no intervention in patients undergoing elective caesarean section. Dexamethasone increased the risk of PDPH, after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section, when compared to placebo. Morphine also increased the number of participants affected by adverse events (pruritus and nausea and vomiting)There is a lack of conclusive evidence for the other drugs assessed (fentanyl, caffeine, indomethacin and dexamethasone).These conclusions should be interpreted with caution, owing to the lack of information, to allow correct appraisal of risk of bias and the small sample sizes of studies.

Effect of dexamethasone on the frequency of postdural puncture headache after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

In this study, we evaluated the effect of dexamethasone used as a prophylaxis for nausea and vomiting on the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in pregnant women receiving spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 372 women under spinal anesthesia received 8 mg of dexamethasone or placebo intravenously just after the umbilical cord was clamped. The rate of PDPH and correlated risk factors were evaluated. The prevalence of nausea and vomiting in the dexamethasone and placebo groups was 54.4 and 51.7%, respectively. There was no statistically meaningful difference between the results (P value = 0.673). The overall incidence rate of PDPH was 10.8%, with 28 cases from the dexamethasone group compared with 11 subjects from the placebo group (P value = 0.006). This effect was most prominent on the first day (P value = 0.046) and disappeared on the second day after spinal anesthesia (P value = 0.678). Prophylactic treatment with 8 mg of dexamethasone not only increases the severity and incidence of PDPH, but is also ineffective in decreasing the prevalence of intra-operative nausea and vomiting during cesarean section. The treatment is a significant risk factor for the development of PDPH.

[Is there any point in pharmacological prophylaxis of PDPH (post-dural puncture headache) after spinal anaesthesia for Caesaren section?]

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To assess the effectiveness of postoperatively applied pharmacological prophylaxis and the impact of demographic parameters (age, height, weight), gestational age, parturients' morbidity (hypertension, motion sickness), postoperative fluid resuscitation, applied anaesthetic technique (spinal needle type and diameter, patient's positioning, choice of intervertebral space for puncturing dura, a dose of local anaesthetic) on the incidence of PDPH after spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were analyzed 182 mothers who delivered by Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Postoperative management included fluid administration 2500 ml daily and i.v. antibiotic prophylaxis (control group, n = 560). The consecutive groups of patients were administered antibiotic and fluids in dose as mentioned above, and additionally oral caffeine 3 x 200 mg (n = 40); caffeine plus magnesium 2 x 1 g daily i.v. (n = 42) or caffeine plus magnesium plus aminophylline 250 mg i.v. once daily (n = 40). Incidence of PDPH was analyzed in all the groups of patients.

RESULTS

The incidence of PDPH was lower after usage of thin spinal needles (Spinokan 27G), but statistical significance was p = 0.07. The other analyzed factors did not affect the incidence of PDPH. None of the applied pharmacoprophylactic methods appeared to be efficacious. The volume of administered within 18 hours postoperatively crystalloids was larger in the group of patients with multifactorial pharmacoprophylaxis (p = 0.04), probably due vasodilatation caused by synergistic effect of magnesium and aminophylline; explanation of this phenomenon is arguable, however.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither prophylactic administration of caffeine, magnesium or aminophylline, nor postoperative fluid administration, did not influence the incidence of PDPH.

[Post-dural puncture headache: treatment and prevention]

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common iatrogenic and incapacitating complication. Dural puncture can be intentional (spinal block, myelography,...) or accidental (epidural block). Risk factors are well described and the obstetric patient is at high risk for PDPH. The treatment of PDPH is not standardised. Many options have been proposed, but only the epidural blood patch has apparent benefits. A few measures have been suggested to prevent PDPH after unintentional dural puncture, but none has been shown to work with certainty.

Pain, postdural puncture headache, nausea, and pruritus after cesarean delivery: a survey of prophylaxis and treatment

BACKGROUND

The need for a cesarean delivery may interfere negatively with the overall experience of childbirth. Several factors related to anesthesiological management such as postoperative pain and discomfort, nausea and pruritus, and postdural puncture headache (PDPH), may lead to dissatisfaction and have a negative impact on early mobilization and a new mother's ability to care for her newborn baby. Optimal prophylaxis and treatment decrease these complications, increase satisfaction, and prevent chronic pain. This survey determined how prophylaxis and treatment of pain, PDPH, nausea, and pruritus after cesarean section (CS) is managed.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to 709 departments of anesthesiology serving an obstetric unit in Germany. The questionnaire asked about different aspects of pain management, the management of accidental dural puncture (ADP), and treatment of PDPH. Further we asked about therapy and prophylaxis of nausea and pruritus in the peripartal setting.

RESULTS

In all, 360 questionnaires (50.8%) were returned; 346 were complete and analyzed (accounting for 330000 births per year). Paracetamol (77.5%) and piritramide (85.6%) are the most common analgesics used. If epidural catheters were used for anesthesia for CS, 47.7% were used for postoperative pain therapy. However, 92.7% of the departments removed catheters in less than 24 hours after delivery. In case of an ADP most departments (69.9%) repeated puncture, 2.6% placed catheters intrathecally. Median blood volume for an epidural blood patch was 10ml.

CONCLUSION

Apart from conservative treatment of PDPH, prophylaxis and treatment of pain after cesarean delivery, PDPH, nausea, and pruritus varied widely, indicating the need for the qualitative evaluation of overall management.

Dexamethasone in preventing post-dural puncture headache: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Spinal anesthesia is major complication is Post-Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) which is an intense and debilitating event. We decided to assess if intravenous administration of dexamethasone can decrease the incidence and/or intensity of this kind of headache. For this purpose 178 patients, who were supposed to undergo lower extremity orthopedic surgery, were enrolled in the study . Before spinal anesthesia was initiated, the first group (DXM-group) received 2 mL intravenous (i.v) dexamethasone whereas the second group (PCB-group) received 2 mL i.v. normal saline. After termination of surgery, a 7 days follow-up started to observe the possible occurrence and intensity of PDPH. There was no statistically significant difference between DMX and PCB groups regarding the incidence of PDPH. However, the intensity of headache differed between the two groups being less severe if IV dexamethasone had been given prophylactically. Dexamethasone can be used to decrease the severity of PDPH in patients who receive spinal anesthesia.

Epidural blood patching for preventing and treating post-dural puncture headache

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in Issue 2, 2002. Dural puncture is a common procedure, but leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the resulting dural defect may cause post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) after the procedure, and this can be disabling. Injecting an epidural blood patch around the site of the defect may stop this leakage.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the possible benefits and harms of epidural blood patching in both prevention and treatment of PDPH.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane PaPaS Group Trials Register; CENTRAL; MEDLINE and EMBASE in April 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We sought all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared epidural blood patch versus no epidural blood patch in the prevention or treatment of PDPH among all types of participants undergoing dural puncture for any reason. The primary outcome of effectiveness was postural headache.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author extracted details of trial methodology and outcome data from studies considered eligible for inclusion. We invited authors of all such studies to provide any details that were unavailable in the published reports. We performed intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses using the Peto O-E method. We also extracted information about adverse effects (post-dural puncture backache and epidural infection).

MAIN RESULTS

Nine studies (379 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Prophylactic epidural blood patch improved PDPH compared to no treatment (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.64, one study), conservative treatment (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.14, two studies) and epidural saline patch (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.55, one study). However, prophylactic epidural blood patch did not result in less PDPH than a sham procedure (one study). Therapeutic epidural blood patch resulted in less PDPH than conservative treatment (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.76, one study) and a sham procedure (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.39, one study). Backache was more common with epidural blood patch. However, these studies had very small numbers of participants and outcome events, as well as uncertainties about trial methodology, which preclude reliable assessments of the potential benefits and harms of the intervention.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The review authors do not recommend prophylactic epidural blood patch over other treatments because there are too few trial participants to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn. However, therapeutic epidural blood patch showed a benefit over conservative treatment, based on the limited available evidence.

Lumbar puncture

This article discusses the need for lumbar puncture, preparation of the patient and equipment necessary for this procedure. The rationale for the intervention is described with a focus on the nursing management before, during and after the procedure.

Caffeine for the prevention and treatment of postdural puncture headache: debunking the myth

OBJECTIVE

Is caffeine effective in preventing and treating postdural puncture headache (PDPH)?

METHODS

The question was addressed with a structured evidence-based clinical neurologic practice review via videoconferencing between 3 academic institutions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, clinical epidemiologists, medical librarians, and clinical content experts. A critically appraised topic format was employed, starting with a clinical scenario and structured question. Participant groups at each of the 3 institutions independently devised search strategies, located and compiled the best evidence, performed critical appraisals, synthesized the results, summarized the evidence, provided commentary, and declared bottom-line conclusions.

RESULTS

Three directly relevant randomized controlled trial articles were selected as the best available evidence for the clinical questions. Two investigated caffeine [oral and intravenous (IV)] as PDPH prophylaxis and 1 (oral) as PDPH treatment. One additional quasirandomized trial (IV) and 1 open-label trial (IV) of caffeine for PDPH treatment were located by reviewing bibliographies. Articles describing the pharmacological basis for caffeine therapy were also identified. No valid pharmacological rationale for caffeine as an antinociceptive agent for PDPH exists. The clinical trials are few in number, small in sample size, methodologically weak or flawed, and either demonstrate no effectiveness, contradictory and conflicting results, or invalid answers.

CONCLUSIONS

The wide endorsement for caffeine to prevent and treat PDPH found in textbooks and review articles appears to be unwarranted and insufficiently supported by the available pharmacological and clinical evidence.

[Post-lumbar puncture headache]

The postdural puncture headache is a frequent iatrogenic complication due to an excessive leakage of cerebrospinal fluid. The leak through the dural perforation mainly depends on the size and design of the needle. The diagnostic is based on the notion of dural puncture, headache worsening in upright posture and other symptoms as neck stiffness, tinnitus, hypacusia, photophobia or nausea. Symptoms resolve spontaneously within 1 week or within 48 hours after autologous epidural blood patch. Prevention is based on using small-gauge pencil-point needles whereas the duration of bed rest has no effect on the incidence of postlumbar puncture headache.

Effective Epidural Blood Patch Volumes for Postdural Puncture Headache in Taiwanese Women

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Epidural blood patch (EDBP) is the most commonly used method to treat postdural puncture headache (PDPH). The optimal or effective blood volume for epidural injection is still controversial and under debated. This study compared the therapeutic efficacy of 7.5 mL blood vs. 15 mL blood for EDBP via epidural catheter injection.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients who suffered from severe PDPH due to accidental dural puncture during epidural anesthesia for cesarean section or epidural analgesia for labor pain control were randomly allocated into two groups. EDBP was conducted and autologous blood 7.5 mL or 15 mL was injected via an epidural catheter in the semi-sitting position in Group I (n = 17) and II (n = 16), respectively. For all patients in both groups, the severity of PDPH was registered on a 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate, severe) and assessed 1 hour, 24 hours and 3 days after EDBP.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups of patients at all time points with respect to the severity of PDPH. Two patients in Group I and nine in Group II developed nerve root irritating pain during blood injection (p < 0.05). No systemic complications were noted in both groups of patients throughout EDBP injection.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that injection of 7.5 mL autologous blood into the epidural space is comparable to 15 mL blood in its analgesic effect on PDPH, but with less nerve root irritating pain during injection.

Standard vs atraumatic Whitacre needle for diagnostic lumbar puncture: a randomized trial

In order to define the impact of needle type on post-lumbar puncture headache (PLPH), we performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing the incidence of PLPH in patients undergoing lumbar punctures (LPs) with traumatic vs atraumatic 22-gauge needles. Fifty-eight patients underwent 85 LPs. The incidence of PLPH was 36% in the traumatic vs 3% in the atraumatic group (p = 0.002).

Postdural puncture headache

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Postdural puncture headache remains the most frequent complication of neuraxial anesthesia. It can occur following uncomplicated spinal anesthesia as well as unintended dural puncture during epidural anesthesia.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence following accidental dural puncture is not as high as previously thought--approximately 50%. There are not many maneuvers that prevent postdural puncture headache. The most promising is an intrathecal catheter as it avoids further dural puncture and seals the hole during the time it is in place, decreasing cerebrospinal fluid loss. Several means to treat a postdural puncture headache exist. Medications that increase cerebral vascular resistance are the ones advocated. Methergine (methylergonovine maleate) has been advocated for postdural puncture headache following spinal anesthesia; it has not been studied for accidental dural puncture with a large bore needle. Epidural blood patch remains the treatment of choice.

SUMMARY

An epidural blood patch should not be performed until 24 h after dural puncture to increase its success; however, it should not be delayed beyond that period in the symptomatic patient, as this delay increases the amount of time the patient suffers.