Early and sustained survival benefit associated with statin therapy at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Long-term administration of statin therapy has been shown to reduce major coronary events and cardiac mortality within randomized clinical trials. In addition to lowering lipids, statins favorably affect platelet adhesion, thrombosis, endothelial function, inflammation, and plaque stability, which may potentially improve outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, we hypothesized that statin therapy has an early beneficial effect among patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Each year from 1993 to 1999, we prospectively collected data among the first 1000 patients undergoing PCI. Patients who presented with acute or recent myocardial infarction or cardiogenic shock were excluded from the analysis. Baseline, procedural, and 6-month data of statin-treated and non-statin-treated patients were compared. Propensity score and multivariate survival analysis were used to adjust for heterogeneity between the two groups. Of 5052 patients who completed follow-up, 26.5% were treated with statin at the time of the procedure. Statin therapy was associated with a mortality reduction at 30 days (0.8% versus 1.5%; hazard ratio, 0.53; P=0.048) and at 6 months (2.4% versus 3.6%; hazard ratio, 0.67; P=0.046). After adjusting for the propensity to receive statin therapy before the procedure and other confounders, statin therapy remained an independent predictor for survival at 6 months after coronary intervention (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.99; P=0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large study cohort, statin therapy among PCI patients seems to be associated with a significant mortality advantage at early and intermediate-term follow-up.

Eptifibatide and low-dose tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: the integrilin and low-dose thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (INTRO AMI) trial

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that eptifibatide and reduced-dose tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) will enhance infarct artery patency at 60 min in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Combination fibrin and platelet lysis improves epicardial and myocardial reperfusion in AMI.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled in a dose finding (Phase A, n = 344) followed by a dose confirmation (Phase B, n = 305) protocol. All patients received aspirin and weight-adjusted heparin and underwent angiography at 60 and 90 min. In Phase A, eptifibatide in a single or double bolus (30 min apart) of 180, 180/90 or 180/180 microg/kg followed by an infusion of 1.33 or 2.0 microg/kg per min was sequentially added to 25 or 50 mg of t-PA. In Phase B, patients were randomized to: 1) double-bolus eptifibatide 180/90 (30 min apart) and 1.33 microg/kg per min infusion with 50 mg t-PA (Group I); 2) 180/90 (10 min apart) and 2.0 g/kg per min with 50 mg t-PA (Group II); or 3) full-dose, weight-adjusted t-PA (Group III).

RESULTS

In Phase A, the best rate of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 was achieved using 180/90/1.33 microg/kg per min eptifibatide with 50 mg t-PA: 65% and 78% at 60 and 90 min, respectively. In Phase B, the incidence of TIMI flow grade 3 at 60 min was 42%, 56% and 40%, for Groups I through III, respectively (p = 0.04, Group II vs. Group III). The median corrected TIMI frame count was 38, 33 and 50, respectively (p = 0.02). TIMI major bleeding was reported in 8%, 11% and 6%, respectively; intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 1%, 3% and 2% of patients (p > 0.5 for both). The incidences of death (4%, 5% and 7%), reinfarction or revascularization at 30 days were similar among the three treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with standard t-PA regimen, double-bolus eptifibatide (10 min apart) with a 48-h infusion and half-dose t-PA (Group II) is associated with improved quality and speed of reperfusion. The safety profile of this therapy is similar to that of other combination regimens.

Patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST elevation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention benefit most from early intervention with protection by a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker

BACKGROUND

Many patients with acute coronary syndromes are offered percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the appropriate indications for, and optimal timing of, such procedures are uncertain. We analysed timing of intervention and associated events (death and myocardial infarction) in the PURSUIT trial in which 9461 patients received a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, eptifibatide, or placebo for 72 h. Other treatment was left to the investigators. 2430 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention within 30 days. Four groups were distinguished, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention on day 1; on days 2 or 3; at 4 to 7 days; or between 8 until 30 days, for eptifibatide- and placebo-treated patients.

RESULTS

The four groups treated with placebo demonstrated total 30-day events of 15.9% for day 1 percutaneous coronary intervention, 17.7%, 15.0% and 18.2%, respectively, for successive intervals of later intervention. Later intervention was associated with more pre-procedural events (2.2% to 13.7%, P=0.001) which was balanced by a decrease in procedure-related events (12.1 to 3.1%, P=0.001), while the overall 30-day event rates were similar. Eptifibatide-treated patients with percutaneous coronary intervention on day 1 had the lowest rate of 30-day events (9.2%, P<0.05 vs other groups). In this group, pre-procedural risk was only 0.3%, while percutaneous coronary intervention on eptifibatide treatment was associated with low procedural risk (7.2%). The total 30-day event rate for later percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving eptifibatide was 14.0 on days 2 and 3, 15.0% for days 4 to 7 and 17.4% for days 7 to 30, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker, and early percutaneous coronary intervention (within 24 h) had the lowest event rate in this post hoc analysis. Thus 'watchful waiting' may not be the optimal strategy. Rather an early invasive strategy with percutaneous coronary intervention under protection of a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker should be considered in selected patients. Randomized trials are warranted to verify this issue.

Persistence of delays in presentation and treatment for patients with acute myocardial infarction: The GUSTO-I and GUSTO-III experience

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Early treatment with fibrinolytic therapy substantially decreases mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We examined delays to hospital arrival and treatment in 2 large, multinational, randomized trials of fibrinolytic therapy: Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) and Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-III).

METHODS

We evaluated delays to hospital arrival, time from arrival to treatment, and total time to treatment in the 27,849 US patients with AMI enrolled in GUSTO-I or GUSTO-III. Time intervals were defined prospectively for total time to treatment and symptom onset to hospital arrival as 0 to 2 hours (early), 2 to 4 hours, or more than 4 hours (late). Time to fibrinolytic therapy once in hospital was prospectively defined as 0 to 1 hour (early) or more than 1 hour (late). Socioeconomic data were also obtained from patients enrolled in the GUSTO-III trial.

RESULTS

In GUSTO-III, as in GUSTO-I, patients who arrived at the hospital later were older (64 years versus 60 years; P =.001) and more often female (35% versus 27%; P =.001), black (6% versus 4%; P =.02), and diabetic (25% versus 16%; P =.001). These groups also received treatment later once in hospital, as did patients with hypertension (48% versus 42%; P =.001), previous angina (46% versus 36%; P =.001), and previous infarction (21% versus 16%; P =.001). Higher levels of education, professional occupations, and private health insurance were associated with significantly earlier arrival and treatment. Although in hospital time to treatment has decreased (66 minutes to 48 minutes; P <.0001), time to arrival has not changed over the past 7 years, averaging 84 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Certain groups of patients with AMI, including the elderly, women, diabetic patients, and minorities, exhibit delays to hospital arrival and treatment in the emergency setting. Patients with higher educational levels, professional occupations, and private health insurance arrive at the hospital sooner and receive treatment more quickly. Patients and health care providers must be educated regarding high-risk populations for delay to maximize benefit from fibrinolytic therapy.

Misreporting of myocardial infarction end points: results of adjudication by a central clinical events committee in the PARAGON-B trial. Second Platelet IIb/IIIa Antagonist for the Reduction of Acute Coronary Syndrome Events in a Global Organization Network Trial

BACKGROUND

Myocardial (re)infarction (MI), a common trial end point, can be difficult to identify because of inconclusive signs and symptoms. We examined disagreement between investigator and clinical events committee (CEC) reporting of MIs in an international, randomized trial.

METHODS

The primary end point of the PARAGON-B trial was a 30-day composite of death, MI (CEC adjudicated), or ischemia-driven intervention. If CEC and investigator determinations of MI differed, we sent investigators event summaries and rationales for CEC decisions and asked whether they now agreed with the CEC assessment. If they still disagreed, they were to provide a rationale and supporting data. Such cases were reviewed, and a final decision was made.

RESULTS

Overall, 1736 of 5225 (33%) patients had suspected MIs; the CEC adjudicated 483 of 1736 (28%) as MIs. In 404 patients (23%), investigator and CEC assessments of MI differed; 270 MIs were identified by the CEC but not investigators, and 134 were identified by investigators but not the CEC. Most disagreements concerned periprocedural MIs, but some reflected clinical ischemia and enzyme elevations. Letters for 382 disagreements were sent and returned by investigators, and investigators came to agree with CEC assessments in 307 cases (80%). For the other 75 cases (20%), after review the investigators' assessments were confirmed in 10 cases, and the original CEC decisions were supported in the other 65 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Investigators misreport MI end points, but most later agree with CEC assessments. These data support standard, independent adjudication of suspected MIs for accurate reporting, which may affect evaluations of therapies, sample-size calculations, and event-rate comparisons across trials.

Outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes and prior coronary artery bypass grafting: results from the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in unstable angina: receptor suppression using integrilin therapy (PURSUIT) trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with prior CABG with a subsequent non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) pose an increasingly important clinical problem. Although GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have improved the outcome of patients with ACS, their efficacy in patients with prior CABG has not been previously evaluated. Methods and Results- We analyzed the 30- and 180-day outcomes of patients with prior CABG enrolled in the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial. In this trial, which evaluated the efficacy of eptifibatide in patients with ACS, 1134 patients (12%) with prior CABG and 8321 without prior CABG were enrolled. After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics and treatment, patients with prior CABG had a significantly higher mortality rates at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.45 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.98]; P=0.019) and at 180 days (HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.67]; P=0.021). At 30 days, there was a similar effect on the primary end point of death or myocardial infarction in the eptifibatide group versus the placebo group in prior CABG patients (unadjusted HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.67 to 1.20]) and in patients without a history of CABG (unadjusted HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80 to 0.99]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with prior CABG with non-ST-segment elevation ACS have a significantly worse prognosis than do patients without a history of CABG. The treatment effect of eptifibatide in the prior CABG group was similar to the effect seen in patients without prior CABG.

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been shown to reduce cardiac complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The clinical efficacy of these drugs in acute coronary syndromes, however, is still unclear. We did a meta-analysis of all large randomised trials designed to study the clinical efficacy and safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndromes who were not routinely scheduled to undergo early coronary revascularisation.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were: randomisation of patients with acute coronary syndromes but without persistent ST elevation; comparison of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor with placebo or control therapy; non-recommendation of early coronary revascularisation during study-drug infusion; and enrollment of at least 1000 patients. Data on individual patients were obtained from all participants in these trials.

FINDINGS

Six trials, enrolling 31402 patients, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 30 days after randomisation, 3530 (11.2%) patients died or developed a myocardial infarction. At 30 days, a 9% reduction in the odds of death or myocardial infarction was seen with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors compared with placebo or control (10.8% [1980/18297] vs 11.8% [1550/13105] events; odds ratio 0.91 [95% CI 0.84-0.98]; p=0.015). The relative treatment benefit was similar in subgroups of patients according to important clinical baseline characteristics; hence, the absolute treatment benefit was largest in high-risk patients. An unexpected and significant interaction was seen between sex and allocated treatment, with a treatment benefit in men (0.81 [0.75-0.89] but not in women (1.15 [1.01-1.30]). However, once patients were stratified according to troponin concentration, there was no evidence of a sex difference in treatment response, and a risk reduction was seen in men and women with raised troponin concentrations. Major bleeding complications were increased by glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (2.4% [445/18297] vs 1.4% [180/13105]; p<0.0001), but intracranial bleeding was not (16 [0.09%] vs 8 [0.06%]; p=0.40).

INTERPRETATION

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce the occurrence of death or myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes not routinely scheduled for early revascularisation. The event reduction is greatest in patients at high risk of thrombotic complications. Treatment with a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor might therefore be considered especially in such patients early after admission, and continued until a decision about early coronary revascularisation has been made.

Long-term mortality benefit with the combination of stents and abciximab for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction

Cardiogenic shock secondary to ischemic heart disease is associated with a high mortality rate, and recent trials have established the benefit of an early invasive approach. However, the role of adjunctive abciximab and stenting for cardiogenic shock has not been established. We prospectively examined collected data from 96 consecutive patients who underwent emergent percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock over the past 7 years. Patients were classified as receiving stent plus abciximab, stent alone, percutaneous transluminal coronary angiopplasty (PTCA) plus abciximab, or PTCA alone. Baseline characteristics of the 4 groups were similar. During 2.5 years of follow-up, the mortality rates for stent plus abciximab, stent only, PTCA plus abciximab, and PTCA alone were 33%, 43%, 61%, and 68%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.028). Achievement of postprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow was higher with stent plus abciximab than with the other interventions (85% vs 65%, p = 0.048). By multivariate analysis, absence of stent use (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 1.36 to 4.90, p = 0.004) and left ventricular ejection function </=30% (hazard ratio 3.89, 95% confidence interval 1.53 to 9.87, p = 0.004) were independent predictors for mortality during 2.5 years of follow-up. In conclusion, treatment with the combination of stent and abciximab resulted in higher procedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow rates and a long-term mortality benefit in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Meta-analysis of randomized and registry comparisons of ticlopidine with clopidogrel after stenting

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether clopidogrel is at least as efficacious as ticlopidine.

BACKGROUND

Several trials have supported the enhanced safety and tolerability of clopidogrel compared with ticlopidine after coronary stent deployment. However, none of these individual trials were powered to detect possible differences in the efficacy for reducing ischemic end points.

METHODS

Published data from trials and registries that compared clopidogrel with ticlopidine in patients receiving coronary stents were pooled, and a formal meta-analysis was performed. The rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), as defined in each trial, was used as the primary end point.

RESULTS

There were a total of 13,955 patients. The pooled rate of major adverse cardiac events was 2.10% in the clopidogrel group and 4.04% in the ticlopidine group. After adjustment for heterogeneity in the trials, the odds ratio (OR) of having an ischemic event with clopidogrel, as compared with ticlopidine, was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59 to 0.89, p = 0.002). Mortality was also lower in the clopidogrel group compared with the ticlopidine group-0.48% versus 1.09% (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.82; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on all available evidence from randomized clinical trials or registries, clopidogrel, in addition to better tolerability and fewer side effects, is at least as efficacious as ticlopidine in reducing MACE. This finding may be due to the more rapid onset of an antiplatelet effect seen with the loading dose of clopidogrel, which was used in most of these studies, or to better patient compliance with clopidogrel therapy. Therefore, clopidogrel plus aspirin should replace ticlopidine plus aspirin as the standard antiplatelet regimen after stent deployment.

The prognostic value of creatine kinase elevations extends across the whole spectrum of acute coronary syndromes

OBJECTIVES

The study investigated the relationship among creatine kinase (CK) elevations, clinical characteristics and cardiac events across the whole spectrum of acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

BACKGROUND

Elevated serum levels of cardiac enzymes have been shown to be a major prognostic determinant in acute myocardial ischemia. Yet prior to this report, the relation between cardiac enzyme levels and other prognostic determinants across the entire spectrum of ACS has not been explored by a large clinical study.

METHODS

We evaluated the relation between the maximum CK ratio (CK level/upper limit of normal) in the early hours following admission and cardiac events at six months in 11,725 patients enrolled in a large trial of ACS.

RESULTS

Patients with higher risk characteristics, such as older age, female gender, hypertension, diabetes, prior coronary events or heart failure, more frequently presented without ST-segment elevation on the electrocardiogram and tended to develop lesser enzyme elevations. After adjusting for significant baseline predictors of cardiac events, a continuous correlation was observed between the CK ratio and death (chi-square 63.04, p < 0.0001) and (re)infarction or death (chi-square 55.48, p < 0.0001). This correlation was similar for patients with and without ST-segment elevation. The adjusted incidence of cardiac events at follow-up began to rise even for CK levels within the normal range, the steepest part of the curve residing between one and three times the upper limit of normal. In patients with a CK ratio of >1 to 2 compared with those within the normal range, the adjusted odds ratio for death was 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98 to 1.63), and 1.59 (95% CI 1.38 to 1.90) for (re)infarction and death. For all CK levels, the event rate was higher among patients without ST-segment elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although high-risk patients with ACS often develop lesser CK elevations, this study demonstrated that even minor enzyme elevations appear to have important and independent prognostic implications.

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce mortality in diabetic patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for adverse outcomes after acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Because this disease may be associated with increased platelet aggregation, we investigated whether diabetic patients with ACS derive particular benefit from platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a meta-analysis of the diabetic populations enrolled in the 6 large-scale platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor ACS trials: PRISM, PRISM-PLUS, PARAGON A, PARAGON B, PURSUIT, and GUSTO IV. Among 6458 diabetic patients, platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibition was associated with a significant mortality reduction at 30 days, from 6.2% to 4.6% (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.92; P=0.007). Conversely, 23 072 nondiabetic patients had no survival benefit (3.0% versus 3.0%). The interaction between platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibition and diabetic status was statistically significant (P=0.036). Among 1279 diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during index hospitalization, the use of these agents was associated with a mortality reduction at 30 days from 4.0% to 1.2% (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.69; P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis, including the entire large-scale trial experience of intravenous platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors for the medical management of non-ST-segment-elevation ACS, shows that these agents may significantly reduce mortality at 30 days in diabetic patients. Although not based on a randomized assessment, the survival benefit appears to be of greater magnitude in patients undergoing PCI. Therefore, the use of platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors should be strongly considered in diabetic patients with ACS.

Attenuation of rebound ischemia after discontinuation of heparin therapy by glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with eptifibatide in patients with acute coronary syndromes: observations from the platelet IIb/IIIa in unstable angina: receptor suppression using integrilin therapy (PURSUIT) trial

Background- A reactivation of ischemia after the discontinuation of intravenous heparin in acute coronary syndromes has been described. The effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade on heparin rebound is unknown. Methods and Results- Patients with acute coronary syndromes who received heparin therapy but not initial revascularization in the Platelet IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial were analyzed. Rates of death or myocardial (re)infarction while on heparin therapy and in 12-hour periods in the 2 days after heparin discontinuation were compared between eptifibatide and placebo. There was no difference between study groups in event rates during heparin infusion. In the 12 hours after heparin discontinuation, there was a 2.5-fold increase in all events, an 8-fold increase in death, and a 2-fold increase in myocardial infarction. However, in the 12 hours after heparin discontinuation, there was a significantly lower rate of events (1.68% versus 2.53%, P=0.03) and death (0.77% versus 0.21%, P=0.002) in the eptifibatide group compared with the placebo group. When only considering patients who were on study drug at the time of heparin discontinuation, the reduction in the combined end point was marginally significant, but the difference in the rate of death remained significant (0.68% versus 0.06%, P=0.004). In logistic regression analyses, the multivariate predictors of rebound events were the duration of heparin therapy, age, North American site, and lack of eptifibatide treatment. Conclusions- An increase in death or myocardial infarction occurs in the 12 hours after heparin discontinuation in patients with acute coronary syndromes. This rebound is attenuated by glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with eptifibatide.

Bivalirudin versus heparin during coronary angioplasty for unstable or postinfarction angina: Final report reanalysis of the Bivalirudin Angioplasty Study

BACKGROUND

This study was a reanalysis of the Bivalirudin Angioplasty Study, which compared bivalirudin with high-dose heparin during coronary angioplasty for unstable angina.

METHODS

Differences in rates of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization were compared at 7, 90, and 180 days after angioplasty with intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

The combined end point occurred in 135 of 2161 patients (6.2%) in the bivalirudin group and in 169 of 2151 patients (7.9%) in the heparin group at 7 days (P =.039). Differences persisted between the groups at 90 days (P =.012) and 180 days (P =.153). Bleeding occurred in 76 patients (3.5%) in the bivalirudin group versus 199 (9.3%) in the heparin group (P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis supports the hypothesis that bivalirudin reduces ischemic complications and bleeding after angioplasty. Further trials are needed to evaluate bivalirudin versus heparin in conjunction with platelet-glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and for coronary stenting.

Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin after carotid artery stenting

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery stenting is being used as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy, both within the context of clinical trials and in non-surgical candidates. Though stenting is known to activate platelets, the role of antithrombotic therapy in carotid stenting has not been fully characterized.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients (n = 162) were followed in a single-center carotid stent registry. The cumulative rate of 30-day death, stroke, transient ischemic attack and myocardial infarction in those patients receiving a thienopyridine was determined, as were rates of stent thrombosis and intracranial hemorrhage. The mean age of the patients was 70.3 years and there was an extremely high prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities, including 40% with unstable angina. The carotid lesion was symptomatic in 59% of patients. The average pre-treatment stenosis was 83%. The cumulative 30-day rate of death, stroke, transient ischemic attack and myocardial infarction was 5.6%. Specifically, in the patients who received ticlopidine (n = 23), the rate was 13%, versus 4.3% in the patients who received clopidogrel (n = 139) (p = 0.01). In this series, there were no cases of stent thrombosis and 1 intracranial hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients receiving carotid artery stents is associated with a low rate of ischemic events. Furthermore, clopidogrel appears superior to ticlopidine. Thus, our findings lend support to the dual antiplatelet strategy of clopidogrel plus aspirin for patients undergoing carotid artery stenting.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in multiple novel thrombospondin genes may be associated with familial premature myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in high-throughput genomics technology have expanded our ability to catalogue allelic variants in large sets of candidate genes related to premature coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 398 families were identified in 15 participating medical centers; they fulfilled the criteria of myocardial infarction, revascularization, or a significant coronary artery lesion diagnosed before 45 years in men or 50 years in women. A total of 62 vascular biology genes and 72 single-nucleotide polymorphisms were assessed. Previously undescribed variants in 3 related members of the thrombospondin protein family were prominent among a small set of single-nucleotide polymorphisms that showed a statistical association with premature coronary artery disease. A missense variant of thrombospondin 4 (A387P) showed the strongest association, with an adjusted odds ratio for myocardial infarction of 1.89 (P=0.002 adjusted for covariates) for individuals carrying the P allele. A variant in the 3' untranslated region of thrombospondin-2 (change of thymidine to guanine) seemed to have a protective effect against myocardial in individuals homozygous for the variant (adjusted odds ratio of 0.31; P=0.0018). A missense variant in thrombospondin-1 (N700S) was associated with an adjusted odds ratio for coronary artery disease of 11.90 (P=0.041) in homozygous individuals, who also had the lowest level of thrombospondin-1 by plasma assay (P=0.0019).

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale genetic study has identified the potential of multiple novel variants in the thrombospondin gene family to be associated with familial premature myocardial infarction. Notwithstanding multiple caveats, thrombospondins specifically and high-throughput genomic technology in general deserve further study in familial ischemic heart disease.

beta-blockers before percutaneous coronary intervention do not attenuate postprocedural creatine kinase isoenzyme rise

BACKGROUND

beta-blocker (BB) use reduces infarct size in spontaneously occurring nonreperfused infarcts but probably does not change infarct size in patients treated with reperfusion therapy. A recent observational study suggested that BB use concurrent with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decreased the risk of creatine kinase (CK)-MB elevation. The cogency of such a conclusion is dependent on the ability to risk-adjust for the multiple differences in patients treated with and without BBs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using propensity score and multivariate regression analyses, 6200 consecutive patients were analyzed to assess the relationship between BB use before PCI and per protocol-measured CK and CK-MB rise. There were several highly significant (P<0.001) differences between patients with and without BB treatment (eg, age, prior infarction, unstable angina). Maximum CK and CK-MB levels were higher in patients taking BBs (CK median, 95 U [interquartile range: 61, 175]; CK-MB, 3 U [2, 5]) than in patients not taking BBs (CK, 91 U [60, 157]; CK-MB, 3 U [2, 4]) (P=0.011 and P=0.021 for CK and CK-MB, respectively). After adjustment for significant differences in baseline characteristics there was no difference in either maximum CK rise (P=0.21) or maximum CK-MB rise (P=0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this large observation study do not support the contention that BB use before PCI decreases myocardial injury.