Hydroxyapatite fractionation procedures in the study of the mammalian genome

Three methods of fractionating DNA are described, in which DNA fragments are separated on the basis (1) of their base composition, (2) of the ability of denatured DNA to renature after incubation, and (3) of the presence of intrastrand secondary structure in denatured DNA. The ability of some of these fractions to form specific duplexes with whole denatured DNA isolated from the same and from a different mammal has been investigated. The results are presented to demonstrate how the fractionation procedures described may provide new information about the organization of the mammalian genome.

Unrelatedness of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis

Eight strains of highly amylolytic, sporeforming bacilli (hereafter referred to as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens) were compared with respect to their taxonomic relationship to B. subtilis. The physiological-biochemical properties of these two groups of organisms showed that B. amyloliquefaciens differed from B. subtilis by their ability to grow in 10% NaCl, characteristic growth on potato plugs, increased production of alpha-amylase, and their ability to ferment lactose with the production of acid. The base compositions of the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) of the B. subtilis strains consistently fell in the range of 41.5 to 43.5% guanine + cytosine (G + C), whereas that of the B. amyloliquefaciens strains was in the 43.5 to 44.9% G + C range. Hybrid formation between B. subtilis W23 and B. amyloliquefaciens F DNA revealed only a 14.7 to 15.4% DNA homology between the two species. Transducing phage, SP-10, was able to propagate on B. subtilis W23 and B. amyloliquefaciens N, and would transduce B. subtilis 168 (indole(-)) and B. amyloliquefaciens N-10 (arginine(-)) to prototrophy with a frequency of 3.9 x 10(-4) and 2.4 x 10(-5) transductants per plaque-forming unit, respectively. Attempts to transduce between the two species were unsuccessful. These data show that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens is a valid species and should not be classified as a strain or variety of B. subtilis.