Smad4 and FAST-1 in the assembly of activin-responsive factor

Members of the TGF-beta superfamily of signalling molecules work by activating transmembrane receptors with phosphorylating activity (serine-threonine kinase receptors); these in turn phosphorylate and activate SMADs, a class of signal transducers. Activins are growth factors that act primarily through Smad2, possibly in partnership with Smad4, which forms heteromeric complexes with different ligand-specific SMADs after activation. In frog embryos, Smad2 participates in an activin-responsive factor (ARF), which then binds to a promoter element of the Mix.2 gene. The principal DNA-binding component of ARF is FAST-1, a transcription factor with a novel winged-helix structure. We now report that Smad4 is present in ARF, and that FAST-1, Smad4 and Smad2 co-immunoprecipitate in a ligand-regulated fashion. We have mapped the site of interaction between FAST-1 and Smad2/Smad4 to a novel carboxy-terminal domain of FAST-1, and find that overexpression of this domain specifically inhibits activin signalling. In a yeast two-hybrid assay, the FAST-1 carboxy terminus interacts with Smad2 but not Smad4. Deletion mutants of the FAST-1 carboxy terminus that still participate in ligand-regulated Smad2 binding no longer associated with Smad4 or ARF. These results indicate that Smad4 stabilizes a ligand-stimulated Smad2-FAST-1 complex as an active DNA-binding factor.

Smad4 (homolog of human DPC4) and Smad2 (homolog of human JV18-1): candidates for murine lung tumor resistance and suppressor genes

In this study we investigated the mouse mad-related genes, Smad4/Dpc4 and Smad2 (homolog of JV18-1), as candidates for involvement in lung tumor resistance and suppression. These genes are located in a region of mouse chromosome 18 that is syntenic with human 18q21.1, where several genes that are mutated in various cancers have been mapped. A newly identified murine lung tumor resistance locus, Par2 has also been mapped to this region of chromosome 18. We found no mutations in the coding regions of either gene in 11 lung tumors from B6CF1 (C57BL/6 x BALB/c) mice by RT-PCR and SSCP/RFLP, suggesting that these genes are not mutated in lung carcinogenesis in this strain. Moreover, loss of heterozygosity in this region of chromosome 18 was not detected in 28 lung adenocarcinomas from B6CF1 mice, 17 lung adenocarcinomas from B6C3F1 mice or 18 lung adenocarcinomas from AB6F1 mice. These data provide evidence that a 'classical' tumor suppressor gene for mouse lung carcinogenesis in these strains does not reside in this region. In order to investigate Smad4/Dpc4 and Smad2 as candidates for the Par2 resistance locus mapped to this region, we also sequenced the coding regions of both genes in cDNA from normal lungs of A/J, BALB/c and C57BL/6 inbred strains of mice. No polymorphisms were detected in the coding region of Smad4. In Smad2, two sequence polymorphisms were identified that are not in the conserved regions of the gene. Northern blot analysis revealed no differential expression in normal lung tissue among the three strains for either gene. Thus, in this study we found no evidence that either Smad4 or Smad2 represents the Par2 lung tumor resistance locus or is a lung tumor suppressor gene in the B6CF1 mice.

TGF-beta receptor-mediated signalling through Smad2, Smad3 and Smad4

Smad family members are newly identified essential intracellular signalling components of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily. Smad2 and Smad3 are structurally highly similar and mediate TGF-beta signals. Smad4 is distantly related to Smads 2 and 3, and forms a heteromeric complex with Smad2 after TGF-beta or activin stimulation. Here we show that Smad2 and Smad3 interacted with the kinase-deficient TGF-beta type I receptor (TbetaR)-I after it was phosphorylated by TbetaR-II kinase. TGF-beta1 induced phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 in Mv1Lu mink lung epithelial cells. Smad4 was found to be constitutively phosphorylated in Mv1Lu cells, the phosphorylation level remaining unchanged upon TGF-beta1 stimulation. Similar results were obtained using HSC4 cells, which are also growth-inhibited by TGF-beta. Smads 2 and 3 interacted with Smad4 after TbetaR activation in transfected COS cells. In addition, we observed TbetaR-activation-dependent interaction between Smad2 and Smad3. Smads 2, 3 and 4 accumulated in the nucleus upon TGF-beta1 treatment in Mv1Lu cells, and showed a synergistic effect in a transcriptional reporter assay using the TGF-beta-inducible plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promoter. Dominant-negative Smad3 inhibited the transcriptional synergistic response by Smad2 and Smad4. These data suggest that TGF-beta induces heteromeric complexes of Smads 2, 3 and 4, and their concomitant translocation to the nucleus, which is required for efficient TGF-beta signal transduction.

Expression and mutational analysis of the DCC, DPC4, and MADR2/JV18-1 genes in neuroblastoma

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 18q21 is found frequently in various human cancers. Three candidate tumor suppressor genes, DCC (deleted in colorectal carcinomas), DPC4 (deleted in pancreatic carcinomas, locus 4), and MADR2/JV18-1 (MAD-related gene 2), have been cloned and identified from this chromosome region. We have reported recently that LOH on chromosome 18q is observed frequently in neuroblastoma. Alterations of DCC are involved in many human tumors. DPC4 and MADR2/JV18-1 are recently demonstrated to be altered in pancreatic and colorectal cancers, respectively. To confirm if inactivation of the DCC, DPC4, and MADR2/JV18-1 genes is involved in the pathogenesis of neuroblastoma and to clarify the mechanism of inactivation, we analyzed the expression of DCC, DPC4, and MADR2/JV18-1 in neuroblastoma cell lines and primary tumors by reverse transcription-PCR and investigated the mutations in the coding regions of these genes by PCR/reverse transcription-PCR single-strand conformation polymorphism. We found that 12 of 25 (48%) cell lines and 14 of 32 (44%) primary tumors, including 3 with 18q LOH, had absent or reduced expression of DCC mRNA. Expression was more likely to be reduced in advanced (67%) than in early stage neuroblastomas (24%) (P = 0.036), suggesting that inactivation of the DCC gene plays an important role in the progression of neuroblastoma. Altered expression of DPC4 was found in six (24%) cell lines and six (19%) tumors. MADR2/JV18-1 expression was reduced or absent only in four (16%) cell lines and three (9%) tumors. Mutations of the DCC genes were examined in 25 of 29 exons in neuroblastoma cell lines, and those exons in which mutations were found were further examined in primary tumors. We found missense mutations of AAC (Asn) to AGC (Ser) at DCC codon 176 in one cell line and ACC (Thr) to ATC (Ile) at codon 1105 in one cell line and tumor, respectively; polymorphisms of CGA (Arg) to GGA (Gly) at codon 201 and TTT (Phe) to TTG (Leu) at codon 951 in most of the cell lines and tumors; and a silent mutation of GAG (Glu) to GAA (Glu) at codon 118 in four cell lines and five primary tumors. We did not identify any mutations in the DPC4 and MADR2/JV18-1 genes in neuroblastoma. Our results suggested that mutations of the DCC gene may be involved in the pathogenesis of neuroblastomas but failed to account for the relatively high frequency of the altered expression, implying that other mechanisms are responsible for the inactivation of the DCC gene in neuroblastoma. Low frequency of reduced or absent mRNA expression and lack of mutations in DPC4 and MADR2/JV18-1 genes suggested a limited role for these two genes in neuroblastoma.

Comparative mutational analysis of DPC4 (Smad4) in prostatic and colorectal carcinomas

Allelic deletions of chromosome 18q are reported to be common in prostate and colorectal cancers, suggesting that one or more tumor suppressor genes on 18q are involved in the genesis of these neoplasms. The DPC4 gene, a recently identified candidate tumor suppressor in 18q21, was examined for evidence of inactivation in prostatic carcinomas, and results compared to those of a parallel analysis of colorectal carcinomas, for which DPC4 mutation has been reported in approximately 10% of cases. In this study, only three (10%) of 29 informative primary prostate cancers showed allelic loss of chromosome 18q21 markers, and no point mutations or deletions of DPC4 were detected in the complete set of 45 primary or metastatic cases. In contrast, five (56%) of nine primary colorectal tumors displayed allelic loss of 18q markers and in one of these a somatically acquired G-->T missense mutation was found in exon 1. Of twelve colorectal tumor cell lines, one showed a G-->C missense mutation in exon 8 and two had partial homozygous deletions that would likely abrogate gene function. These data suggest that DPC4 is rarely if ever mutated during prostatic oncogenesis, whereas inactivation of this gene may contribute to the genesis of a subset of colorectal carcinomas.

A structural basis for mutational inactivation of the tumour suppressor Smad4

The Smad4/DPC4 tumour suppressor is inactivated in nearly half of pancreatic carcinomas and to a lesser extent in a variety of other cancers. Smad4/DPC4, and the related tumour suppressor Smad2, belong to the SMAD family of proteins that mediate signalling by the TGF-beta/activin/BMP-2/4 cytokine superfamily from receptor Ser/Thr protein kinases at the cell surface to the nucleus. SMAD proteins, which are phosphorylated by the activated receptor, propagate the signal, in part, through homo- and hetero-oligomeric interactions. Smad4/DPC4 plays a central role as it is the shared hetero-oligomerization partner of the other SMADs. The conserved carboxy-terminal domains of SMADs are sufficient for inducing most of the ligand-specific effects, and are the primary targets of tumorigenic inactivation. We now describe the crystal structure of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the Smad4/DPC4 tumour suppressor, determined at 2.5 A resolution. The structure reveals that the Smad4/DPC4 CTD forms a crystallographic trimer through a conserved protein-protein interface, to which the majority of the tumour-derived missense mutations map. These mutations disrupt homo-oligomerization in vitro and in vivo, indicating that the trimeric assembly of the Smad4/DPC4 CTD is critical for signalling and is disrupted by tumorigenic mutations.

Mutations increasing autoinhibition inactivate tumour suppressors Smad2 and Smad4

Smad2 and Smad4 are related tumour-suppressor proteins, which, when stimulated by the growth factor TGF-beta, form a complex to inhibit growth. The effector function of Smad2 and Smad4 is located in the conserved carboxy-terminal domain (C domain) of these proteins and is inhibited by the presence of their amino-terminal domains (N domain). This inhibitory function of the N domain is shown here to involve an interaction with the C domain that prevents the association of Smad2 with Smad4. This inhibitory function is increased in tumour-derived forms of Smad2 and 4 that carry a missense mutation in a conserved N domain arginine residue. The mutant N domains have an increased affinity for their respective C domains, inhibit the Smad2-Smad4 interaction, and prevent TGF beta-induced Smad2-Smad4 association and signalling. Whereas mutations in the C domain disrupt the effector function of the Smad proteins, N-domain arginine mutations inhibit SMAD signalling through a gain of autoinhibitory function. Gain of autoinhibitory function is a new mechanism for inactivating tumour suppressors.

Frequency of Smad gene mutations in human cancers

Much excitement has recently been generated by the discovery of the Smad genes, encoding proteins that transduce signals from the transforming growth factor beta family of cytokines. Here, we report the completion of cloning of the six known human Smads, providing novel sequences for Smad5 and Smad6. Previously, Smad4 and Smad2 were shown to be mutated in human cancers. However, analysis of the other four Smad genes revealed no mutations in a total of 167 tumors, including those from colon, breast, lung, and pancreas. These results suggest that the various Smad genes have different functions and demonstrate that mutations in these four genes do not, in general, account for the widespread resistance to transforming growth factor beta that is found in human tumors.

Characterization of functional domains within Smad4/DPC4

Smad proteins are a family of highly conserved, intracellular proteins that signal cellular responses downstream of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) family serine/threonine kinase receptors. One of these molecules, Smad4, originally identified as the candidate tumor suppressor gene dpc-4, reconstitutes TGF-beta- and activin-dependent transcriptional responses in Smad4 null cell lines and interacts in a ligand-dependent manner with other Smad family members in both TGF-beta, activin, and bone morphogenetic protein-2/-4 pathways. Here, we used an assay based on the restoration of ligand-dependent transcriptional responses in a Smad4 null cell line to characterize functional domain structures within Smad4. We showed that restoration of TGF-beta-induced transcriptional responses by Smad4 was inhibited by co-transfection with a kinase dead TGF-beta type II receptor and that constitutive activation was blocked with TGF-beta neutralizing antibodies, confirming the essential role of Smad4 in TGF-beta signaling. Using a series of Smad4 mutation, deletion, and Smad1/Smad4 chimera constructs we identified a 47-amino acid deletion within the middle-linker region of Smad4 that is essential for the mediation of signaling responses. In addition, we showed that the NH2-terminal domain of Smad4 augments ligand-dependent activation associated with the middle-linker region, indicating that there is a distinct ligand-response domain within the N terminus of this molecule.

Tumor-suppressive pathways in pancreatic carcinoma

During tumorigenesis, positive selection is exerted upon those tumor cells that alter rate-limiting regulatory pathways. A corollary of this principle is that mutation of one gene abrogates the need for alteration of another gene in the same pathway and also that the coexistence in a single tumor of mutations in different genes implies their involvement in distinct tumor-suppressive pathways. We studied 42 pancreatic adenocarcinomas for genetic alterations in the K-ras oncogene and the p16, p53, and DPC4 tumor suppressor genes. All of them had the K-ras gene mutated. Thirty-eight % of the tumors had four altered genes, another 38% had three altered genes, 15% had two altered genes, and 8% of the tumors had one altered gene. Interestingly, we noted a high concordance of DPC4 and p16 inactivations (P = 0.007), suggesting that the genetic inactivation of p16 increases the selective advantage of subsequent mutation in DPC4. No statistically significant association was identified between the alteration of these cancer genes and pathological or clinical parameters. This type of multigenic analysis in human tumors may serve to substantiate experimental tumor models and thus increase our understanding of the truly physiologically relevant tumor-suppressive pathways that are abrogated during human tumorigenesis.

DPC4 (SMAD4) mediates transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) induced growth inhibition and transcriptional response in breast tumour cells

A family of structurally related proteins homologous to the Drosophila mothers against dpp (MAD) gene product have been implicated in signal transduction by members of the TGF-beta superfamily. One of these MAD related proteins (DPC4) has been cloned as a candidate tumour suppressor in pancreas carcinomas, suggesting a role for DPC4 in growth regulation by TGF-beta related proteins. The involvement of DPC4 in TGF-beta1 induced growth inhibition and transcriptional response is demonstrated here, by the introduction of DPC4 in the TGF-beta and activin insensitive breast tumour cell line MDA-MB-468, from which the DPC4 gene is deleted. Transfection of DPC4 in this cell line restores both growth inhibition and the induction of a TGF-beta sensitive reporter construct (3TPlux) by TGF-beta1. In contrast, a DPC4 splice variant lacking amino acid residues 223-301 and cloned from another TGF-beta and activin resistant breast tumour cell line (MDA-MB-231), does not restore the induction of the 3TPlux reporter by TGF-beta1. We also show that in this latter cell line activin resistance is partly due to the absence of a functional activin type IB receptor. These results indicate that DPC4 is part of the TGF-beta signalling cascade and mediates TGF-beta induced growth inhibition. Together with the deletion of DPC4 from pancreas carcinomas these results suggest a role for DPC4 as a tumour suppressor.

MAD-related genes on 18q21.1, Smad2 and Smad4, are altered infrequently in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The MAD (mothers against decapentaplegic)-related genes, Smad2 (former name MADR2 or JV18-1) and Smad4 (former name DPC4), have been identified on chromosome 18q21.1. We analyzed 30 primary esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC) and 7 cell lines derived from ESCC for intragenic mutations and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the Smad2 and Smad4 genes. LOH was detected in 5 of 14 (35%) informative cases. However, no mutations in either gene were detected in either the primary carcinomas or the cell lines, and only a G-to-A base transition within the 3'-untranslated region of the Smad4 gene was observed in a carcinoma. There were no homozygous deletions in either of the genes in the cell lines. MAD-related genes on chromosome 18q21.1 are altered infrequently in ESCC.

The tumor suppressor Smad4/DPC 4 as a central mediator of Smad function

BACKGROUND

The invertebrate and vertebrate Smad proteins have recently been identified as important mediators of the responses to transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) and related factors. We have previously shown that Smad3 and Smad4 (the product of the tumor suppressor gene DPC 4) strongly synergize as mediators of TGF-beta signaling, and that inactive carboxy-terminally truncated mutants of either Smad act as dominant-negative inhibitors of the natural TGF-beta response. The finding that Smad4, unlike Smad3, does not interact with the TGF-beta receptor, coupled with the distinct structural features of Smad4, raises the possibility that Smad4 cooperates not only with Smad3, but also with Smad1 and Smad2 to mediate signaling by TGF-beta family members.

RESULTS

Overexpression of Smad4 in 'animal caps' taken from Xenopus embryos induced both ventral and dorsal mesoderm, thereby mimicking the effects of TGF-beta family members - bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) or BMP-4 and activin, respectively. Low levels of Smad4 mRNA coinjected with Smad1 or Smad2 mRNA also synergized to induce ventral or dorsal mesoderm, respectively. In addition, Smad4 synergized Smad2, as it does with Smad3, to induce gene expression from the promoter for plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. The carboxy-terminal domains of both Smad3 and Smad4 were required for this synergy. Finally, a short carboxy-terminal truncation of Smad4, previously identified as a mutation of DPC 4 in tumors, blocked nuclear translocation of wild-type Smads 1, 2, 3 and 4, consistent with our observation of a physical interaction between truncated Smad4 and the other Smads.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations indicate that Smad4 cooperates with Smad1, Smad2 and Smad3 to act as a common mediator of signaling by TGF-beta-related factors, and provide a mechanism that explains the dominant-negative interference with receptor signaling that results from expression of the naturally occurring Smad4/DPC 4 truncation mutant.

Analysis of the DPC4 gene in gastric carcinoma

Allelic loss on chromosome 18q is involved in the progression of gastric carcinoma. Recently, DPC4 (deleted in pancreatic carcinoma, locus 4), a candidate tumor suppressor gene, has been localized at 18q21.1. This gene is inactivated in nearly one half of pancreatic carcinomas. We tested for DPC4 gene mutations and allelic status at 18q21 in 30 primary gastric carcinomas and 5 gastric carcinoma cell lines. Polymerase chain reaction single-strand conformation polymorphism and sequencing analyses revealed no DPC4 mutations in any of the primary tumors or cell lines. Homozygous deletion of DPC4 was observed in only 1 (MKN-45) of the 5 (20%) cell lines. This suggests that the target gene for loss on 18q is not DPC4. The true tumor suppressor gene, encoded near DPC4, has yet to be identified.

Genomic sequencing of DPC4 in the analysis of familial pancreatic carcinoma

A first-degree relative with pancreatic cancer is found in 5% to 10% of patients with pancreatic carcinomas, suggesting an inherited predisposition for this neoplasm. The recently identified DPC4 tumor suppressor gene is a strong candidate for the gene responsible for the familial form of pancreatic carcinoma. DPC4 was identified in a consensus area of homozygous deletion in pancreatic carcinomas, and it is biallelically inactivated in approximately 50% of sporadic pancreatic carcinomas. The coding sequence of this gene is 1660 nucleotides in length, covering 11 exons. We describe optimized primers and conditions used in polymerase chain reaction and cycle sequencing of the entire DPC4 coding sequence of 25 individuals (eight with pancreatic carcinoma) from 11 kindreds with a familial aggregation of pancreatic carcinoma. No mutations in the coding sequences of the DPC4 gene were found; hence, it appears that germline mutations in DPC4 cannot account for many of the familial aggregations of pancreatic carcinoma.

Transfer of chromosome 18 into human head and neck squamous carcinoma cells: evidence for tumor suppression by Smad4/DPC4

Cytogenetic, allelotype, and somatic cell hybrid studies of human head and neck cancers had suggested that the long arm of chromosome 18 might carry a tumor suppressor gene locus. To directly test this hypothesis, we introduced a wild-type copy of chromosome 18 into FaDu-Hyg-R head and neck squamous carcinoma cells. Five of 10 chromosome 18 hybrid clones formed invasive carcinomas in nude mice at a significantly lower rate and after a longer latency than the parental tumor cells, whereas the five remaining clones were tumorigenic. These results indicate that tumor formation was suppressed by chromosome 18. A homozygously deleted region of 18q in FaDu-Hyg-R cells included the candidate tumor suppressor gene, Smad4/DPC4, and extended into the DCC tumor suppressor gene locus, but not Smad2/MADR2. Each of the hybrid cell lines carried a full-length donor copy of the DCC gene, independently of their capability to form tumors in vivo. In contrast, each of the hybrid clones that were either completely or partly suppressed carried an intact copy of Smad4/DPC4, whereas this gene was deleted in the two most highly tumorigenic clones. Furthermore, the presence of Smad4/DPC4 correlated with partial restoration of cellular responsiveness to transforming growth factor beta. These results provide strong evidence for tumor suppression by Smad4/DPC4.

Infrequent DPC4 gene mutation in esophageal cancer, gastric cancer and ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasms

Homozygously Deleted in Pancreatic Cancer 4 (DPC4), a recently identified candidate tumor suppressor gene, was previously shown to be altered in human pancreatic cancers. We examined DPC4 mutation in 30 examples of three other types of gastrointestinal malignancy: 10 esophageal cancers, 10 gastric cancers and 10 colorectal cancers occurring in the preneoplastic condition, ulcerative colitis. The entire coding region of DPC4 (including all 11 exons) was analysed by either direct sequencing of PCR product or the in vitro synthesized protein assay. No coding region mutations of DPC4 were found in any of the samples examined. Our results suggest that inactivation of DPC4 may not be important in the majority of these types of gastrointestinal cancer.

Somatic alterations of the DPC4 gene in human colorectal cancers in vivo

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The chromosome region 18q21 has been shown to be frequently deleted in colorectal cancers, and such frequent allelic loss is a hallmark of the presence of a tumor-suppressor gene. The DPC4 gene, which is located at 18q21, has been identified as a tumor-suppressor gene from examination of pancreatic cancers. The aim of the present study was to determine if it might also be altered in colorectal cancers.

METHODS

Mutation analyses of the DPC4 gene were performed on complementary DNA samples from 31 primary colorectal cancer specimens using a combination of polymerase chain reaction, single-strand conformation polymorphism, and DNA sequencing.

RESULTS

Four missense mutations producing amino acid substitutions and a somatic 12-base pair deletion in the coding region of the DPC4 gene were detected in the 31 cancers (16%; 5 of 31).

CONCLUSIONS

The DPC4 gene may play a role as a tumor-suppressor gene in a fraction of colorectal cancers; however, while allelic loss at 18q21 is very often seen in colorectal cancers, only a minority show DPC4 mutations, suggesting that there might be another tumor-suppressor gene in this chromosome region.

Partnership between DPC4 and SMAD proteins in TGF-beta signalling pathways

The TGF-beta/activin/BMP superfamily of growth factors signals through heteromeric receptor complexes of type I and type II serine/threonine kinase receptors. The signal originated by TGF-beta-like molecules appears to be transduced by a set of evolutionarily conserved proteins known as SMADs, which upon activation directly translocate to the nucleus where they may activate transcription. Five SMAD proteins have so far been characterized in vertebrates. These factors are related to the mediator of decapentaplegic (dpp) signalling, mothers against dpp (Mad), in Drosophila and to the Sma genes from Caenorhabditis elegans. Smad1 and Smad2 have been shown to mimic the effects of BMP and activin, respectively, both in Xenopus and in mammalian cells, whereas Smad3 (a close homologue of Smad2) and the related protein DPC4, a tumour-suppressor gene product, mediate TGF-beta actions. We report here that DPC4 is essential for the function of Smad1 and Smad2 in pathways that signal mesoderm induction and patterning in Xenopus embryos, as well as antimitogenic and transcriptional responses in breast epithelial cells. DPC4 associates with Smad1 in response to BMP and with Smad2 in response to activin or TGF-beta. DPC4 is therefore a regulated partner of SMADs that function in different signalling pathways of the TGF-beta family.