[Radiologic response assessment in metastatic colorectal cancers]

The increasing indications of cytostatic biotherapies and the improvement in metastatic surgery have profoundly changed the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Then the development of prognostic and predictive scores would be useful to stratify the treatments. Tumor radiological measurement is crucial to estimate treatment efficacy, and to predict pathological response and survival, and this parameter is included when a prognostic score is developed. But the standard size-based radiologic criteria, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), was designed ten years ago to assess tumor volume reduction after cytotoxic chemotherapy only. Nowadays, this method may be insufficient for mCRC patients. The aim of this review is to describe the different radiological assessments evaluated in mCRC, and to underline their correlations with patient's survival and pathologic response. A better knowledge of these radiological measurements would help to better integrate them in prospective trials, and in the prognostic and predictive scores. The choice of radiological measurement could be discussed regarding patient's situation, combining different approaches, and assessing tumoral mass quantification.

Peripheral Innate Lymphoid Cells Are Increased in First Line Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Patients: A Negative Correlation With Th1 Immune Responses

Several distinct innate lymphoid cell (ILC) populations have been recently identified and shown to play a critical role in the immediate immune defense. In the context of tumors, there is evidence to support a dual role for ILCs with pro- or antitumor effects, depending on the ILC subset and the type of cancer. This ambivalent role has been particularly well-described in colorectal cancer models (CRC), but the presence and the evolution of ILCs in the peripheral blood of metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients have not yet been explored. Here, we investigated the distribution of ILC subsets in 96 mCRC patients who were prospectively included in the “Epitopes-CRC02” trial. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were analyzed by flow cytometry at metastatic diagnosis and after 3-months of treatment. The treatments consisted of Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapies for 76% of the patients or Folfiri (5FU, Irinotecan) chemotherapies for 14% of patients. Compared to healthy donors, the frequency of total ILCs was dramatically increased at metastatic diagnosis. CD56⁺ ILC1-like cells were expanded, whereas ILC2, NCR⁻ ILCP and NCR⁺ ILCP subsets were decreased. Combined analysis with the systemic anti-telomerase hTERT Th1 CD4 response revealed that patients with low anti-TERT Th1 CD4 responses had the highest frequencies of total ILCs at diagnosis. Of those, 91% had synchronous metastases, and their median progression-free survival was 7.43 months (vs. 9.17 months for the other patients). In these patients, ILC1 and ILC2 were significantly decreased, whereas CD56⁺ ILC1-like cells were significantly increased compared to patients with low frequency of total ILCs and high anti-TERT responses. After treatment, the NCR⁺ ILCP were further decreased irrespective of the chemotherapy regimen, whereas the balance between ILC1 and CD56⁺ ILC1-like cells was modulated mainly by the Folfiri regimen in favor of ILC1. Altogether our results describe the effects of different chemotherapies on ILCs in mCRC patients. We also establish for the first time a link between frequency of ILCs and anti-tumor CD4 T cell responses in cancer patients. Thus, our study supports an interest in monitoring ILCs during cancer therapy to possibly identify predictive biomarkers in mCRC.

CD4 T cells target colorectal cancer antigens upregulated by oxaliplatin

Immune checkpoint blockade has proven its efficacy in hypermutated subtypes of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC). Immunogenic potential can also be observed with conventional chemotherapies, but this property has never been explored thoroughly in CRC patients. The CRC therapeutic arsenal includes oxaliplatin, a well-characterized platinum drug already described as immunogenic. Here, we investigated the impact of the oxaliplatin-based treatment on mCRC immunopeptidome. We demonstrated that oxaliplatin-resistant CRC cell lines overexpressed telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), colorectal-associated-tumor antigen-1 (COA-1) and mesothelin tumor-associated antigens. We identified new HLA class-II-restricted and promiscuous peptides derived from COA-1 and mesothelin. The two naturally processed peptides COA-1_331-345 and Meso_366-380 appear to be the most immunogenic in mCRC patients. A prospective cohort of 162 mCRC patients enabled us to explore the impact of oxaliplatin exposure on the antitumor-specific immune response. Interestingly, chemotherapy-naive mCRC patients present high immune CD4 T-cell responses directed against TERT, COA-1 and mesothelin-derived peptides. These antitumor T-cell responses were maintained after 3 months of oxaliplatin-based treatment. Altogether, these findings highlight the interest of immunostimulatory agents to improve the management of chemoresistant mCRC patients. Finally, the high frequency of immune responses targeting the new immunogenic peptides derived from COA-1 and mesothelin support their use in immunomonitoring strategies.

Ramucirumab and paclitaxel in patients with gastric cancer and prior trastuzumab: subgroup analysis from RAINBOW study

Aim: This subgroup analysis of the RAINBOW study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in patients with gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who received prior trastuzumab therapy. Patients & methods: Of adult patients enrolled in the RAINBOW study, 39 had received prior trastuzumab therapy. Of these, 20 patients were treated with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel and 19 patients with placebo plus paclitaxel within the RAINBOW trial. Results: Overall survival was longer with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (11.4 months; 95% CI: 7.0-17.9) versus placebo plus paclitaxel (7.0 months; 95% CI: 3.4-14.6), hazard ratio: 0.68 (0.33-1.41); p = 0.30. Longer progression-free survival, higher objective response were observed in ramucirumab combination group. Conclusion: Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel demonstrated efficacy benefits with manageable safety profile in a subgroup of patients pretreated with trastuzumab. Clinical trial registration number: NCT01170663.

FOLFOX alone or combined with rilotumumab or panitumumab as first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (PRODIGE 17-ACCORD 20-MEGA): a randomised, open-label, three-arm phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) pathways, which promote tumour growth and proliferation, are often deregulated in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. We assessed whether adding panitumumab (an EGFR inhibitor) or rilotumumab (a HGF inhibitor) to first-line fluoropyrimidine-based and platinum-based chemotherapy (modified oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil [mFOLFOX6]) benefits to patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II, open-label, randomised, three-arm study enrolled patients ≥18 years, with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 and no known HER2 overexpression. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m² bolus then 2400 mg/m² over 46 h) alone or combined with panitumumab (6 mg/kg) or rilotumumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks until limiting toxicity, patient's refusal or disease progression. The primary end-point was the 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary end-points included overall survival (OS) and tolerance.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 162 patients in 29 French centres. The median follow-up was 23.6 months (interquartile range = 16.4-29.0). The 4-month PFS rate was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 57-82) with chemotherapy alone, 57% (95% CI = 42-71) combined with panitumumab and 61% (95% CI = 47-74) combined with rilotumumab. Median OS was 13.1 months (95% CI = 8.7-16.9) with chemotherapy alone, 8.3 months (95% CI = 6.2-13.2) combined with panitumumab and 11.5 months (95% CI = 7.9-17.1) combined with rilotumumab. Adverse events grade ≥III occurred less frequently with chemotherapy alone (62%) than with panitumumab (83%) and rilotumumab (89%).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no benefit in adding panitumumab or rilotumumab to mFOLFOX6 first-line chemotherapy to treat advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

European Clinical Trials Database, number 2009-012797-12.

cfDNA for accurate determination of RAS and BRAF mutations using OncoBEAM liquid biopsy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: Results of the real-world multicentric ColoBEAM study

3542

Background: Determination of KRAS, NRAS ( RAS) and BRAF mutations is a standard of care for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). RAS mutations are well characterized resistance biomarkers to anti-EGFR antibodies and BRAF V600 mutations indicate poor prognosis. Tissue biopsy has traditionally been used to determine RAS and BRAF status, but liquid biopsy analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has demonstrated utility as a less invasive tool to expedite molecular testing results to the clinic. The ColoBEAM study reports the performance of plasma mutation testing in a real-life prospective series of 278 patients across 8 centers. Methods: Plasma derived ctDNA was prepared from 20mL blood samples prospectively collected from mCRC patients who had not received chemotherapy in the prior 15 days. ctDNA was centrally assessed using OncoBEAM and results compared to those obtained by routine analysis of tissue. Both tissue and blood samples with discrepant RAS results were blindly reassessed with OncoBEAM. Results: Of 278 patients enrolled, 202 blood samples were available for OncoBEAM testing. RAS and BRAF V600E mutations were detected in tissue in 132/202 (65.4%) and 4/198 (2.0%) patients, respectively. Analysis of the first ctDNA sample as compared to tissue DNA resulted in a kappa coefficient (κ) of 0.52 [0.41 – 0.63] and accuracy of 75.2% (65.1% sensitivity; 94.3% specificity). OncoBEAM testing of a second sample resulted (κ) of 0.66 [0.56 - 0.76] and accuracy of 83.2% (77.3% sensitivity; 94.3% specificity). Of the 4 samples with a BRAF V600E mutation in tumor tissue 2 were detected in blood. In the subgroup of patients with liver metastasis (n=136), accuracy was 88.2% (87.4% sensitivity; 90.2% specificity) for RAS and BRAF status with (κ) of 0.73 [0.61 – 0.86]. In a subgroup of chemotherapy naïve patients with liver metastasis (n=49), accuracy was 91.8% (93.3% sensitivity; 89.5% specificity) for RAS and BRAF status with (κ) of 0.83 [0.67 – 0.99]. Conclusions: The results of the ColoBEAM study confirm plasma ctDNA as a credible surrogate marker to tissue DNA for RAS and BRAF status assessment and may be incorporated as a first-line theragnostic assessment. New testing on a second sample for wild-type status demonstrated 91.8% concordance between blood and tissue. Clinical trial information: NCT02751177.

Accumulation of active metabolite M-2 predicts overall survival (OS) of chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib (REGO)

3121

Background: TEXCAN, a prospective phase II GERCOR study of treatment with REGO in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (NCT02699073) included a prospective pharmacokinetic (PK) ancillary study aiming to investigate correlations between OS and concentrations (C) of REGO and its active metabolites M-2 and M-5. Methods: 55 patients were included, with the same inclusion/exclusion criteria as CORRECT (NCT01103323), and treated orally with 160 mg REGO daily for 3 weeks on and 1 week off. 34 patients had PK samples at C1D15 and 26 at C2D15 for Cmin. REGO, M-2 and M-5 Cmin were measured by LC-MS/MS. PK analyses studied the link between OS and PK parameters: Cmin of REGO, M-2 and M-5 at C1 and accumulation of pharmacological active metabolites between C1 and C2, assessed by the C2/C1 ratio of M-2 or M-5 Cmin concentrations. Results: REGO, M-2 and M-5 Cmin [median (Q1-Q3)] were respectively 1.99 (1.03-2.73), 1.44 (0.89-2.49) and 1.61 (0.79-2.37) mg/L at C1D15 and 1.90 (1.10-2.76), 1.29 (0.77-2.24) and 1.17 (0.45-2.42) mg/L at C2D15. C2/C1 M-2 ratio and M-5 ratio medians were 0.82 (0.50-1.78) and 0.75 (0.41-1.93), respectively. Univariate analyses showed a major OS benefit in patients with C2/C1 M-2 ratio ≥median vs < median (12.6 vs 4.0 months respectively, hazard ratio = 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.86, p-value = 0.023) but not for C2/C1 M-5 ratio ≥median. Multivariate analyses, including the CORRECT REGOSCORE groups, showedan independent 66% reduction in death risk in the group of patients with C2/C1 M-2 ratio ≥median. The C2/C1 M-2 ratio correlated with C1 REGO+M-2+M-5 (Csum) (0.53, p-value = 0.006). Restricted Cubic spline analysis showed an increased OS benefit as the C2/C1 M-2 ratio rises and when C1 Csum ranged between 2.5 and 5.5 mg/L. PK parameters were not associated with toxicities. Conclusions: M-2 accumulation between C1 and C2 is independently associated with improved OS in mCRC patients treated by REGO. M-2 accumulates and OS is favorable when C1 REGO+M-2+M-5 sum ranged between 2.5 and 5.5 mg/L. These results may lead to develop individual REGO dosage modification strategies based on PK monitoring. Clinical trial information: NCT02699073.

Validation of the Immunoscore prognostic value in stage III colon cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin in the prospective IDEA France cohort study (PRODIGE-GERCOR)

3513

Background: The Immunoscore (IS), which has been shown to prognostically classify Stage I-III colon cancer (CC) patients, was assessed in the IDEA France cohort study evaluating 3 versus 6 months of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage III CC patients. Methods: Densities of CD3+ and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in the tumor and invasive margin of each patient were quantified by digital pathology and converted to IS using pre-defined published cut-off. The performance of IS to predict disease-free survival (DFS) was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, in each study arm, and was adjusted with relevant clinical features in multivariable Cox models. Harrell’s C-statistics was used to investigate the IS performance. Results: 1322 patients were included; 82 were excluded due to pre-analytical non-conformity. IS was successfully analyzed in 1062 (85.6%) eligible patients. In a 2-category IS analysis, Low and (Int+High) IS were observed in n=599 (43.6%) and n=463 (56.4%) patients, respectively. IS was significantly correlated with T stage, T/N stage (T1-3 and N1 versus T4 and/or N2), and microsatellite instability status. The study met its primary objective of validating that Low IS identifies patients with higher-risk of relapse or death [HR=1.54; 95%CI 1.24-1.93, p=0.0001]. The 3-year DFS rates were 66.80% [95%CI 62.23-70.95] and 77.14% [95%CI 73.50-80.35] for Low IS and (Int+High) IS, respectively. In multivariable analysis, IS remained independently associated with DFS (p<0.0012) when combined with T/N stage. The addition of IS to the T/N stage significantly improved the model discrimination capacity [bootstrap C index mean difference, 0.022; 95%CI 0.005-0.04]. In addition, IS in 3 categories (Low, Int, High) and as a continuous variable were also both significantly associated with DFS (all p<0.001). In univariable analysis, IS was also associated with DFS in 6 months arm (p<0.0001); a similar trend was observed in 3 months arm (p=0.09). Conclusions: IS was confirmed as a prognostic factor of DFS in Stage III CC patients in the prospective IDEA France cohort study. Clinical trial information: NCT03422601.

Ramucirumab (RAM) for sorafenib intolerant patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated baseline alpha fetoprotein (AFP): Outcomes from two randomized phase 3 studies (REACH, REACH2)

4073

Background: Oral multikinase inhibitors that have shown improvements in overall survival (OS) in HCC are associated with clinically important toxicities that commonly require dose adjustment or discontinuation (D/C) due to intolerance. REACH and REACH-2 studied RAM in patients (pts) with HCC who progressed on or were intolerant to sorafenib (SOR), and REACH-2 only enrolled pts with baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL. In REACH-2 RAM treatment (trt) improved OS compared to placebo (P), supporting findings in REACH pts with baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL. An exploratory analysis of outcomes by reason for D/C of SOR was performed. Methods: Pts had advanced HCC, Child-Pugh A, ECOG PS 0-1, and prior SOR. Pts were randomized to RAM 8 mg/kg or P Q2W. A pooled independent pt data analysis (stratified by study) of REACH-2 and REACH pts (AFP ≥400 mg/mL) was performed. Results are reported by reason for SOR D/C (intolerance or disease progression). OS and PFS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety are reported. Results: Baseline characteristics in the pooled population were generally balanced between trt arms in each subgroup. Median durations of prior SOR were 2.5 mo for SOR intolerant (n = 70) and 4.0 mo for SOR progressors (n = 472). Median OS (RAM v P) was 10.2 v 6.7 mo for SOR intolerant and 8.0 v 4.7 mo for SOR progressors (Table). Rates of D/C due to trt-related adverse events (AEs) (Table) (7% in each subgroup), and Grade ≥3 AEs (most frequently hypertension) were consistent with those observed in each study. Conclusions: Acknowledging limitations of sample size, the RAM trt benefit in SOR intolerant pts was consistent with that in the ITT population. RAM was well tolerated in SOR intolerant pts with low rates of D/C due to related-AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT01140347, NCT02435433. [Table: see text]

Morbidity and oncological outcomes of rectal cancer impaired by previous prostate malignancy

BACKGROUND

Specific surgical and oncological outcomes in patients with rectal cancer surgery after a previous diagnosis of prostate cancer have not been well described. The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes in patients with rectal cancer with or without a history of prostate cancer.

METHODS

Patients who had surgery for rectal cancer with (PC group) or without (no-PC group) previous curative treatment for prostate cancer were enrolled between January 2001 and December 2015. Comparisons between the two groups were performed by multivariable Cox analysis, and after propensity score matching in a 3 : 1 ratio for demographic and tumour characteristics, and surgical and oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 944 patients with rectal cancer were enrolled, of whom 10·8 per cent had a history of prostate cancer. After matching, 83 patients who had received treatment for prostate cancer were compared with 249 who had not. The PC and no-PC groups were similar regarding patient characteristics. Extended total mesorectal excision, conversion to open surgery, transfusion and tumour perforation were more frequent in the PC group than in the no-PC group. Major surgical morbidity (28 versus 17·2 per cent; P = 0·036), anastomotic leakage (25 versus 13·7 per cent; P = 0·019) and permanent stoma (41 versus 12·4 per cent; P < 0·001) occurred more frequently in the PC group. Local recurrence was increased significantly in the PC group (17 versus 8·0 per cent; P = 0·019), and resulted in a significant decrease in disease-free and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Prostate cancer treatment increases short- and long-term surgical morbidity in patients with rectal cancer, and impairs oncological outcomes.

Health-related quality of life in the early-access phase IIIb study of trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from PRECONNECT study

638

Background: Pivotal RECOURSE trial assessed efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in mCRC patients (pts) without collecting QoL data. Here we describe a preliminary analysis of QoL in mCRC pts treated with FTD/TPI in the ongoing phase 3b PRECONNECT study (NCT03306394). Methods: Eligible pts had histologically mCRC previously treated with available therapies and an ECOG-PS of 0/1. Pts received FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily) orally on days 1–5 and 8–12 of each 28-day cycle. ECOG-PS and QoL were assessed at baseline, every 4 weeks on FTD/TPI and at discontinuation. QoL was measured with EORTC QLQ-C30, EQ-5D index and VAS questionnaires. Utility score was based on EQ-5D index and values from Germany, UK and Spain. For QLQ-C30, clinical relevance was assessed using a 10 point threshold. Changes in utility score and VAS were deemed clinically relevant if ≥ 9 and ≥ 7, respectively. Only results where ≥ 10% of the initial cohort completed the questionnaires were assessed, corresponding to 7 cycles of treatment. Results: 464 pts were included at cutoff (1 November 2017). Median FTD/TPI treatment duration was 2.96 months (range 0.4–14.7). Median time to ECOG-PS ≥ 2 was 8.7 months with 74.3% of pts remaining at ECOG-PS 0/1 at discontinuation. At baseline mean QLQ-C30 global health status was 62.75 (SD = 20.50; median 66.67) with values for all scales in line with EuroQoL reference for mCRC (variation < 10 points on function and < 5 on symptom scales). Baseline EQ-5D VAS was 65.55 (SD = 20.11; median 70.00) and utility score 73.11 (SD = 20.71; median 75.27). There was no clinically relevant difference in mean change from baseline at any time point on global health status score nor any of functional or symptom scales. Similar results were obtained for utility score and VAS. QoL was maintained on FTD/TPI in all subgroups based on age and ECOG-PS for all scales except for appetite loss increase at cycle 5 in pts ≥ 65 and in ECOG-PS 0 in whom the score increased by 12.2 and 10.4, respectively. Conclusions: The first prospective data on QoL suggest that mCRC pts can maintain their QoL while on FTD/TPI treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03306394.

Exploratory analysis of the effect of FTD/TPI in patients treated in RECOURSE by prognostic factors

677

Background: The Phase III RECOURSE trial, in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies, demonstrated that trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) significantly extended overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in all subgroups, regardless of age, geographical origin, or KRAS status, with acceptable safety. Literature reports have shown optimal benefit for pts with low tumor burden (< 3 metastatic sites), indolent disease (≥ 18 mo since diagnosis of first metastasis), ECOG PS 0-1, and no liver metastasis when treated in late line mCRC. Methods: This exploratory post hoc analysis of RECOURSE (all ECOG 0-1) compared pts on FTD/TPI or placebo with good prognostic characteristics (GPC; low tumor burden and indolent disease) and poor prognostic characteristics (PPC; high tumor burden and/or aggressive disease). These subgroups were then analyzed by liver metastasis at baseline, ECOG PS, KRAS status and age. Results: Baseline characteristics were generally similar between the two groups. GPC placebo pts performed better than the PPC placebo pts, but worse than the GPC pts treated with FTD/TPI. GPC pts treated with FTD/TPI showed median OS of 9.3 mo versus 5.3 mo in PPC pts (HR 0.46; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.57; p < 0.0001); there was a similar effect for PFS. GPC pts had significantly better mOS and mPFS regardless of age (≥ 65 vs. < 65 y), ECOG PS (0–1), KRAS status (mutant vs. wildtype), and liver metastasis (y/n). No liver metastasis was the best prognostic factor: mOS in such pts treated with FTD/TPI was 16.4 mo and 7.6 mo in the GPC (n = 97) and PPC (n = 35) groups, respectively (HR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.74; p < 0.0019); there was a similar effect for PFS. Pts with ECOG PS 0 at baseline remained PS 0-1 at discontinuation in 96% of the GPC group. Conclusions: Low tumor burden and indolent disease indicate good prognosis in late line mCRC. Pts with no liver metastasis have the best prognosis and are likely to have longer OS. GPCs might explain the percentage of long-term responders on FTD/TPI in RECOURSE. Maintenance of ECOG PS 0–1 during treatment is crucial in the continuum of care, allowing pts to benefit from further treatment options. Clinical trial information: NCT01607957.

QoL from TASCO1: Health-related quality of life of trifluridine/tipiracil-bevacizumab and capecitabine-bevacizumab as first-line treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer patients not eligible for intensive chemotherapy—Results from the TASCO1 phase II study

676

Background: TASCO1 is a phase II study which evaluated the safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil + bevacizumab (TT-B) and capecitabine + bevacizumab (C-B) in first-line unresectable mCRC patients non-eligible for intensive therapy. Promising activity was shown on progression-free survival with TT-B (9.2 months) and C-B (7.8 months). Here we present the Quality of Life (QoL) analysis of the two treatment arms. Methods: In TASCO1, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive TT-B (n = 76) on a four-week cycle or C-B (n = 77) on a three-week cycle. QoL was assessed in TASCO1 at baseline and at each 12 weeks thereafter, until discontinuation of study treatment, using the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. Responses were described separately in each arm using descriptive statistics. Results: For QLQ-C30, 121 patients completed baseline questionnaire. No clinically relevant difference was observed on treatment in mean change of score from baseline for the global health status, functioning scales, and for most of the symptom scales, except for nausea/vomiting and diarrhoea (worsening in the TT-B group and stable in the C-B group for both symptoms), fatigue (stable in the TT-B group and worsening in the C-B), loss appetite (worsening in the two groups) and insomnia (improvement in the two groups). For QLQ-CR29, 117 patients completed baseline questionnaire. No clinically relevant difference on treatment was observed in mean change of score from baseline for most of items except for the following: hair loss, trouble with taste (worsening for both symptoms in the TT-B group while stable for hair loss and improvement for trouble with taste in the C-B group), sore skin, dry mouth (stable in the TT-B group and worsening in the C-B group for both symptoms), and anxiety (stable in the TT-B group and improvement in the C-B group). Conclusions: The Global Health Scale was maintained in Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab arm as well as in the capecitabine+bevacizumab arm. No clinically relevant difference from baseline was observed over time in both groups except for few sub-scales. Clinical trial information: NCT02743221.

Ramucirumab after sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increased α-fetoprotein concentrations (REACH-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increased α-fetoprotein concentrations have poor prognosis. We aimed to establish the efficacy of ramucirumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and α-fetoprotein concentrations of 400 ng/mL or higher.

METHODS

REACH-2 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 92 hospitals, clinics, and medical centres in 20 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had histologically or cytologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma, or diagnosed cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C disease, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance statuses of 0 or 1, α-fetoprotein concentrations of 400 ng/mL or greater, and had previously received first-line sorafenib. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) via an interactive web response system with a computer-generated random sequence to 8 mg/kg intravenous ramucirumab every 2 weeks or placebo. All patients received best supportive care. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, proportion of patients achieving an objective response, time to radiographic progression, safety, time to deterioration in scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Symptom Index 8 (FHSI-8), and time to deterioration in ECOG performance status. We also pooled individual patient data from REACH-2 with data from REACH (NCT01140347) for patients with α-fetoprotein concentrations of 400 ng/mL or greater. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat, whereas safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02435433.

FINDINGS

Between July 26, 2015, and Aug 30, 2017, 292 patients were randomly assigned, 197 to the ramucirumab group and 95 to the placebo group. At a median follow-up of 7·6 months (IQR 4·0-12·5), median overall survival (8·5 months [95% CI 7·0-10·6] vs 7·3 months [5·4-9·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·710 [95% CI 0·531-0·949]; p=0·0199) and progression-free survival (2·8 months [2·8-4·1] vs 1·6 months [1·5-2·7]; 0·452 [0·339-0·603]; p<0·0001) were significantly improved in the ramucirumab group compared with the placebo group. The proportion of patients with an objective response did not differ significantly between groups (nine [5%] of 197 vs one [1%] of 95; p=0·1697). Median time to deterioration in FHSI-8 total scores (3·7 months [95% CI 2·8-4·4] vs 2·8 months [1·6-2·9]; HR 0·799 [95% CI 0·545-1·171]; p=0·238) and ECOG performance statuses (HR 1·082 [95% CI 0·639-1·832]; p=0·77) did not differ between groups. Grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred in at least 5% of patients in either group were hypertension (25 [13%] in the ramucirumab group vs five [5%] in the placebo group), hyponatraemia (11 [6%] vs 0) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (six [3%] vs five [5%]). Serious adverse events of any grade and cause occurred in 68 (35%) patients in the ramucirumab group and 28 (29%) patients in the placebo group. Three patients in the ramucirumab group died from treatment-emergent adverse events that were judged to be related to study treatment (one had acute kidney injury, one had hepatorenal syndrome, and one had renal failure).

INTERPRETATION

REACH-2 met its primary endpoint, showing improved overall survival for ramucirumab compared with placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and α-fetoprotein concentrations of at least 400 ng/mL who had previously received sorafenib. Ramucirumab was well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile. To our knowledge, REACH-2 is the first positive phase 3 trial done in a biomarker-selected patient population with hepatocellular carcinoma.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly.

ATG9A Is Overexpressed in Triple Negative Breast Cancer and Its In Vitro Extinction Leads to the Inhibition of Pro-Cancer Phenotypes

Early detection and targeted treatments have led to a significant decrease in mortality linked to breast cancer (BC), however, important issues need to be addressed in the future. One of them will be to find new triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) therapeutic strategies, since none are currently efficiently targeting this subtype of BC. Since numerous studies have reported the possibility of targeting the autophagy pathway to treat or limit cancer progression, we analyzed the expression of six autophagy genes (ATG9A, ATG9B, BECLIN1, LC3B, NIX and P62/SQSTM1) in breast cancer tissue, and compared their expression with healthy adjacent tissue. In our study, we observed an increase in ATG9A mRNA expression in TNBC samples from our breast cancer cohort. We also showed that this increase of the transcript was confirmed at the protein level on paraffin-embedded tissues. To corroborate these in vivo data, we designed shRNA- and CRISPR/Cas9-driven inhibition of ATG9A expression in the triple negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-436, in order to determine its role in the regulation of cancer phenotypes. We found that ATG9A inhibition led to an inhibition of in vitro cancer features, suggesting that ATG9A can be considered as a new marker of TNBC and might be considered in the future as a target to develop new specific TNBC therapies.

Personalized identification of tumor-associated immunogenic neoepitopes in hepatocellular carcinoma in complete remission after sorafenib treatment

Sorafenib, a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor, is the current standard systemic treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Sorafenib has anti-angiogenic and anti-proliferative properties and is also known to favor anti-tumor T cell responses by reducing the population of immunosuppressive cells such as Treg and MDSC. Anti-tumor immune responses, especially mediated by CD4+ T-cells, are critical for tumor cells eradication and therapies modulating those responses are appealing in a growing number of cancers. Here, we report and investigate the case of a patient diagnosed with an advanced HCC treated by sorafenib who experienced a complete histological response. We aimed to identify immunogenic peptides derived from tumor mutated proteins that stimulated CD4+ T cells responses thus favoring the exceptional recovery process of this patient. Tumor neoantigens were identified using whole exome sequencing of normal and tumor tissue and peptide MHC binding prediction algorithms. Among 442 tumor-specific somatic variants, 50 missense mutations and 20 neoepitopes predicted to bind MHC-II were identified. Candidate neoepitopes immunogenicity was assessed by IFN-γ ELISpot after culture of patient's PBMCs in presence of synthetic neopeptides. CD4+ memory T cell responses were detected against a mutated IL-1βS230F peptide and two additional neoepitopes from HELZ2V241M and MLL2A4458V suggesting that efficient anti-tumor immune response occurred in this patient. These results showed that T cells can recognize neoantigens and may lead to the cancer elimination after immunomodulation in the tumor-microenvironment induced by sorafenib. This observation indicates that other immunotherapies in combination with sorafenib could potentially increase the response rate in HCC at advanced stage.

Circulating NKp46+ Natural Killer cells have a potential regulatory property and predict distinct survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Natural killer (NK) cells are innate effector lymphocytes widely involved in cancer immunosurveillance. In this study, we described three circulating NK cell subsets in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Compared to healthy donors (HD), lower rate of the cytotoxic CD56^dim CD16⁺ NK cells was found in NSCLC patients (76.1% vs 82.4%, P = 0.0041). In contrast, the rate of CD56^bright NK cells was similar between patients and HD. We showed in NSCLC patients a higher rate of a NK cell subset with CD56^dim CD16^- phenotype (16.7% vs 9.9% P = 0.0001). The degranulation property and cytokines production were mainly drive by CD56^dim CD16^- NK cell subset in patients. Analysis of natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCRs) expression identified four distinct clusters of patients with distinct NK cell subset profiles as compared to one major cluster in HD. Notably the cluster characterized by a low circulating level of NKp46⁺ NK cell subsets was absent in HD. We showed that the rate of circulating NKp46⁺ CD56^dim CD16⁺ NK cells influenced the patients' survival. Indeed, the median overall survival in patients exhibiting high versus low level of this NK cell subset was 16 and 27 months respectively (P = 0.02). Finally, we demonstrated that blocking NKp46 receptor in vitro was able to restore spontaneous tumor specific T cell responses in NSCLC patients. In conclusion, this study showed a distinct distribution and phenotype of circulating NK cell subsets in NSCLC. It also supports the regulatory role of NKp46⁺ NK cell subset in NSCLC patients.

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Quantification Criteria for Identifying Patients not Responding to Bevacizumab-Based Therapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

PURPOSE

 To evaluate changes in tumor vascularization parameters based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantification criteria of at least one visible liver metastasis as an early predictor of non-response to chemotherapy, including bevacizumab for colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 This multicenter prospective study included patients who received first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. Tumor enhancement measured using CEUS within one liver metastasis and in relation to the surrounding healthy liver was quantified within 8 days before the first infusion of bevacizumab (E0), 24 hours after the end of the first infusion of bevacizumab (E1), in the 24 hours before the 2nd and 3 rd infusion of bevacizumab on day 15 (E2) and day 30 (E3), respectively, and after 2 months of treatment (E4). Endpoints were tumor response using RECIST criteria at 2 months, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

 Among the 137 patients included in this study, 109 were analyzed. Only CEUS parameters calculated in relation to healthy liver were significant. High wash-in and wash-out rates at baseline were significantly associated with a better tumor response. Increases over time E2-E0 and E3-E0 for peak enhancement were significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival. Increases over time E2-E0 and E3-E0 for peak enhancement and wash-in area under the curve were significantly associated with a shorter overall survival.

CONCLUSION

 This large study demonstrated that early dynamic changes in the vascularity of liver metastases evaluated by quantified CEUS are associated with outcome in patients receiving first-line bevacizumab-based treatment for metastatic CRC.

FOLFIRI3-aflibercept in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified FOLFIRI3-aflibercept as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter cohort, evaluating the efficacy and safety of the association of aflibercept with FOLFIRI3 (day 1: aflibercept 4 mg/kg, folinic acid 400 mg/m², irinotecan 90 mg/m², 5-fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m² per 46 h; day 3: irinotecan 90 mg/m²) in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Among 74 patients treated in four French centers, nine were excluded due to prior use of aflibercept (n = 3), more than one prior treatment line in irinotecan-naïve patients (n = 3), and inadequate liver function (n = 3). In the “irinotecan-naïve” patients (n = 30), ORR was 43.3% and DCR was 76.7%. Median PFS and OS were 11.3 mo (95%CI: 6.1-29.0) and 17.0 mo (95%CI: 13.0-17.3), respectively. The most common (> 5%) grade 3-4 adverse events were diarrhea (37.9%), neutropenia (14.3%), stomatitis and anemia (10.4%), and hypertension (6.7%). In the “pre-exposed irinotecan” patients (n = 35), 20 (57.1%) received ≥ 2 prior lines of treatment. ORR was 34.3% and DCR was 60.0%. Median PFS and OS were 5.7 mo (95%CI: 3.9-10.4) and 14.3 mo (95%CI: 12.8-19.5), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Minimally modified FOLFIRI has improvement dramatically the FOLFIRI3-aflibercept efficacy, whatever prior use of irinotecan. A prospective randomized trial is warranted to compare FOLFIRI-aflibercept to FOLFIRI3-aflibercept.

Long-term adverse event: inflammatory orbitopathy induced by pembrolizumab in a patient with metastatic melanoma

The recent advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), including anti-programmed cell death 1 protein (anti-PD-1) agents has revolutionized the therapeutic approach of metastatic malignancies. Yet, ICI can disrupt immune tolerance resulting in enhanced immune activation in normal tissues with significant toxicity. A dysregulated activation of T-cells directed to normal tissues stands as the main mechanism of immune-related adverse events (irAE). To date, only two cases of immune-related inflammatory orbitopathy related to anti-PD-1 agents have been reported. This rare immune adverse event usually occurred early after ICI initiation. Here, we report the first case of late inflammatory orbitopathy occurring in a melanoma patient treated with pembrolizumab. Consequently, the occurrence of irAE under ICI should be monitored, even late after treatment instauration.

Isolation and Characterization of an HLA-DRB1*04-Restricted HPV16-E7 T Cell Receptor for Cancer Immunotherapy

High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a causal factor in oropharyngeal and gynecological malignancies, and development of HPV-targeted immunotherapy could be used to treat patients with these cancers. T cell-mediated adoptive immunotherapy targeting E6 and E7, two HPV16 proteins consistently expressed in tumor cells, appears to be both attractive and safe. However, isolation of HPV-specific T cells is difficult owing to the low frequency of these cell precursors in the peripheral blood. In addition, HPV-positive cancer cells often down-regulate major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I expression ex vivo, limiting the efficacy of MHC class I-restricted approaches. Of particular interest is that both CD4 and CD8 T cells can mediate the responses. Given that CD4 T cells play a critical role in coordinating effective antitumor responses, the generation of a T helper response in patients with HPV16-associated malignancies would unleash the ultimate potential of immunotherapy. In this view, T-cell receptor (TCR) gene transfer could be a relevant strategy to generate HPV16-E7-specific and MHC class II-restricted T cells in sufficient numbers. An HPV16-E7/HLA-DRB1*04 TCR has been isolated from a cancer patient with complete response, and retroviral particles encoding this TCR have been produced. The transgenic TCR is highly expressed in transduced T cells, with a functional inducible caspase-9 suicide gene safety cassette. TCR transgenic T cells are HPV16-E7_70-89 specific and HLA-DRB1*04 restricted, as determined by interferon (IFN)-γ secretion. CD8 and CD4 T cells are equivalently transduced and secrete interleukin-2 and IFN-γ when cultured with appropriate targets. We also demonstrate that TCR transgenic T cells recognize the endogenously processed and presented HPV16-E7_70-89 peptide. In conclusion, our data indicate that the production of MHC class II-restricted HPV16-E7-specific T cells is feasible through TCR gene transfer and could be used for immunotherapy.

Randomized, double-blind, phase two study of ruxolitinib plus regorafenib in patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling pathway plays a key role in the systemic inflammatory response in many cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). This study evaluated the addition of ruxolitinib, a potent JAK1/2 inhibitor, to regorafenib in patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic CRC.

METHODS

In this two-part, multicenter, phase 2 study, eligible adult patients had metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2; received fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy (if no contraindication); and if KRAS wild-type (and no contraindication), an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy; and progressed following the last administration of approved therapy. Patients who received previous treatment with regorafenib, had an established cardiac or gastrointestinal disease, or had an active infection requiring treatment were excluded. The study was conducted in 95 sites in North America, European Union, Asia Pacific, and Israel. After an open-label, safety run-in phase (part 1; ruxolitinib 20 mg twice daily [BID] plus regorafenib 160 mg once daily [QD]), the double-blind, randomized phase (part 2) was conducted wherein patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ruxolitinib 15 mg BID plus regorafenib 160 mg QD [ruxolitinib group] or placebo plus regorafenib 160 mg QD [placebo group]. Part 2 included substudy 1 (patients with high systemic inflammation, ie, C-reactive protein [CRP] >10 mg/L) and substudy 2 (patients with low systemic inflammation, ie, CRP ≤10 mg/L); the primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The study was terminated early; substudy 1 was terminated for futility at interim analysis and substudy 2 was terminated per sponsor decision. Ruxolitinib 20 mg BID was well tolerated in the safety run-in (n = 11). Overall, 396 patients were randomized (substudy 1: n = 175 [ruxolitinib group, n = 87; placebo group, n = 88]; substudy 2: n = 221 [ruxolitinib group, n = 110; placebo group, n = 111]). There was no significant difference in OS or progression-free survival (PFS) between treatments in substudy 1 (OS: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.040 [95% confidence interval: 0.725-1.492]; PFS: HR = 1.004 [0.724-1.391]) and substudy 2 (OS: HR = 0.767 [0.478-1.231]; PFS: HR = 0.787 [0.576-1.074]). The most common hematologic adverse event was anemia. No new safety signals with ruxolitinib were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Although addition of ruxolitinib to regorafenib did not show increased safety concerns in patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic CRC, this combination did not improve OS/PFS vs. regorafenib plus placebo.

Fluorouracil and bevacizumab plus anakinra for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies (IRAFU): a single-arm phase 2 study

In preclinical models, IL-1β inhibition could enhance the efficacy of fluorouracil (5-FU). In this phase 2 study, we assessed the activity and safety of 5-FU plus bevacizumab and anakinra (an IL-1β and α inhibitor) in patients with metastatic colorectal (mCRC) refractory to chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy. Eligible patients had unresectable mCRC; were refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, anti-VEGF therapy, and anti-EGFR therapy (for tumors with wild-type KRAS). Patients were treated with a simplified acid folinic plus 5-FU regimen and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) both administered by intravenous infusion for 30 min every 2 weeks. Anakinra (100 mg) was injected subcutaneously once daily. The primary endpoint was the 2-month response rate determined upon CHOI criteria. Thirty two patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled. Five patients demonstrated response (Choi criteria) and 22 patients had stable disease as the best 2-month overall response. Median progression-free and overall survival were 5.4 (95% CI, 3.6-6.6) and 14.5 months (95% CI, 9-20.6) respectively. Twenty patients experienced grade 3 toxicity. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity related to therapy occurred. The most common grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia in 8 (25%) patients, digestive side effects in 7 (21.9%) patients and hypertension in 6 (18.75%) patients. No treatment-related deaths or serious adverse events were reported.5-FU plus bevacizumab and anakinra has promising activity and a manageable safety profile, suggesting that this combination might become a potential treatment option for patients with refractory mCRC.

Docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy for metastatic or unresectable locally recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma (Epitopes-HPV02): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma has been increasing markedly in the past few decades. Currently, there is no validated treatment for advanced-stage anal squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, we aimed to validate the clinical activity and safety of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. We recruited patients from 25 academic hospitals, cancer research centres, and community hospitals in France who were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed anal squamous cell carcinoma, with metastatic disease or with unresectable local recurrence; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1; and with at least one evaluable lesion according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Chemotherapy-naive patients received either six cycles of standard DCF (75 mg/m² docetaxel and 75 mg/m² cisplatin on day 1 and 750 mg/m² per day of fluorouracil for 5 days, every 3 weeks) or eight cycles of modified DCF (40 mg/m² docetaxel and 40 mg/m² cisplatin on day 1 and 1200 mg/m² per day of fluorouracil for 2 days, every 2 weeks), which were administered intravenously. The choice between the standard versus modified regimens was recommended based on, but not limited to, age (≤75 years vs >75 years) and ECOG performance status (0 vs 1). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival at 12 months from the first DCF cycle; for the primary endpoint to be met, at least 11 (17%) of 66 enrolled patients had to be alive without disease progression at 12 months. Efficacy and safety analyses were done in a modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all patients who were evaluable for progression at 12 months who received at least one cycle of DCF. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02402842, and the final results are presented here.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 17, 2014, and Dec 7, 2016, we enrolled 69 patients. Of these patients, three did not receive DCF. Of the 66 patients who received treatment, 36 received the standard DCF regimen and 30 received modified DCF. The primary endpoint was met: 31 (47%) of 66 patients were alive and progression free at 12 months. 22 (61%) of 36 patients who received the standard DCF regimen and 18 (60%) of 30 patients who received the modified DCF regimen had disease progression at data cutoff. 46 (70%) of 66 patients had at least one grade 3-4 adverse event (30 [83%] of 36 in the standard DCF regimen and 16 [53%] of 30 in the modified DCF regimen). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (15 [23%]; eight [22%] for standard DCF vs seven [23%] for modified DCF), diarrhoea (12 [18%]; nine [25%] vs three [10%]), asthenia (ten [15%]; eight [22%] vs two [7%]), anaemia (ten [15%]; six [17%] vs four [13%]), lymphopenia (eight [12%]; three [8%] vs five [17%]), mucositis (seven [11%]; seven [19%] vs none), and vomiting (seven [11%]; five [14%] vs two [7%]). No grade 4 non-haematological adverse events and febrile neutropenia were observed with modified DCF, whereas three (8%) grade 4 non-haematological adverse events and five (14%) cases of febrile neutropenia were reported with standard DCF. 97 serious adverse events were reported (69 in patients who received the standard DCF regimen [61 drug-related] and 28 in those given the modified DCF regimen [14 drug-related]). No treatment-related deaths were recorded.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with standard DCF, modified DCF provided long-lasting response with good tolerability in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma with ECOG performance status of 0-1 in the first-line setting, and therefore could be considered as a new standard of care for these patients. Regarding the elevated risk of high-grade and serious adverse events and febrile neutropenia, standard DCF cannot be recommended in this situation.

FUNDING

Besançon University Hospital and Ligue contre le cancer Grand-Est.

Clinical utility of circulating DNA analysis for rapid detection of actionable mutations to select metastatic colorectal patients for anti-EGFR treatment

Background

While tumor-tissue remains the 'gold standard' for genetic analysis in cancer patients, it is challenged with the advent of circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis from blood samples. Here, we broaden our previous study on the clinical validation of plasma DNA in metastatic colorectal cancer patients, by evaluating its clinical utility under standard management care.

Patients and methods

Concordance and data turnaround-time of ctDNA when compared with tumor-tissue analysis were studied in a real-time blinded prospective multicenter clinical study (n = 140 metastatic colorectal patients). Results are presented according to STARD criteria and were discussed in regard with clinical outcomes of patients.

Results

Much more mutations were found by ctDNA analysis: 59%, 11.8% and 14.4% of the patients were found KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutant by ctDNA analysis instead of 44%, 8.8% and 7.2% by tumor-tissue analysis. Median tumor-tissue data turnaround-time was 16 days while 2 days for ctDNA analysis. Discordant samples analysis revealed that use of biopsy, long delay between tumor-tissue and blood collection and resection of the tumor at time of blood draw, tumor site, or type of tissue analyzed seem to affect concordance. Altogether, the clinical data with respect to the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor response (RAS status) and the prognosis (BRAF status) of those discordant patients do not appear contradictory to the mutational status as determined by plasma analysis. Lastly, we present the first distribution profile of the RAS and BRAF hotspot mutations as determined by ctDNA analysis (n = 119), revealing a high proportion of patients with multiple mutations (45% of the population and up to 5 mutations) and only 24% of WT scored patients for both genes. Mutation profile as determined from ctDNA analysis with using various detection thresholds highlights the importance of the test sensitivity.

Conclusion

Our study showed that ctDNA could replace tumor-tissue analysis, and also clinical utility of ctDNA analysis by considerably reducing data turnaround time.

Baseline splenic volume as a surrogate marker of FOLFIRINOX efficacy in advanced pancreatic carcinoma

Background

The FOLFIRINOX regimen is the standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (aPDAC). However, because of its potential toxicity, predictive biomarkers could help clinical decision-making.

Methods

A cohort of 97 aPDAC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRINOX were studied. The association between splenic volume and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using univariate and multivariable Cox analyses. The external validation cohort was composed of 117 patients treated with Gemcitabine and 52 patients treated with FOLFIRINOX.

Results

In the training cohort, the splenic volume of 97 patients was measured at baseline and at the end of therapy. The spleen size increased in 81% of patients, with at least a 50% increase in 27% of patients. Baseline splenomegaly predicted PFS (HR 1.812, 95% CI = [1.036–3.169]; p = 0.03) and OS (HR 1.983, 95% CI = [1.085–3.624]; p = 0.02) in the training cohort. These results were then validated in an external cohort of patients who were treated with FOLFIRINOX excluding those in the control cohort who were treated with gemcitabine. In a multivariate model based on the CoxBoost method, the following were selected as predictive markers of FOLFIRINOX efficacy (AUC = 0.81): performance status, liver metastasis, baseline Ca199 and CEA levels and baseline splenomegaly. The predictive ability of the model was validated in the external cohort that was also treated with FOLFIRINOX.

Conclusions

Baseline splenomegaly is a predictive marker of a poor response to FOLFIRINOX in aPDAC and remained predictive when associated with other clinical variables.

Identification of a novel PD-L1 positive solid tumor transplantable in HLA-A*0201/DRB1*0101 transgenic mice

HLA-A*0201/DRB1*0101 transgenic mice (A2/DR1 mice) have been developed to study the immunogenicity of tumor antigen-derived T cell epitopes. To extend the use and application of this mouse model in the field of antitumor immunotherapy, we described a tumor cell line generated from a naturally occurring tumor in A2/DR1 mouse named SARC-L1. Histological and genes signature analysis supported the sarcoma origin of this cell line. While SARC-L1 tumor cells lack HLA-DRB1*0101 expression, a very low expression of HLA-A*0201 molecules was found on these cells. Furthermore they also weakly but constitutively expressed the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Interestingly both HLA-A*0201 and PD-L1 expressions can be increased on SARC-L1 after IFN-γ exposure in vitro. We also obtained two genetically modified cell lines highly expressing either HLA-A*0201 or both HLA-A*0201/ HLA-DRB1*0101 molecules referred as SARC-A2 and SARC-A2DR1 respectively. All the SARC-L1-derived cell lines induced aggressive subcutaneous tumors in A2DR1 mice in vivo. The analysis of SARC-L1 tumor microenvironment revealed a strong infiltration by T cells expressing inhibitory receptors such as PD-1 and TIM-3. Finally, we found that SARC-L1 is sensitive to several drugs commonly used to treat sarcoma and also susceptible to anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody therapy in vivo. Collectively, we described a novel syngeneic tumor model A2/DR1 mice that could be used as preclinical tool for the evaluation of antitumor immunotherapies.

In situ delivery of allogeneic natural killer cell (NK) combined with Cetuximab in liver metastases of gastrointestinal carcinoma: A phase I clinical trial

Despite successful introduction of NK-based cellular therapy in the treatment of myeloid leukemia, the potential use of NK alloreactivity in solid malignancies is still elusive. We performed a phase I clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of in situ delivery of allogeneic NK cells combined with cetuximab in liver metastasis of gastrointestinal origin. The conditioning chemotherapy was administrated before the allogeneic NK cells injection via hepatic artery. Three escalating doses were tested (3.10⁶, 8.10⁶ and 12.10⁶ NK cells/kg) following by a high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2). Cetuximab was administered intravenously every week for 7 weeks. Nine patients with liver metastases of colorectal or pancreatic cancers were included, three per dose level. Hepatic artery injection was successfully performed in all patients with no report of dose-limiting toxicity. Two patients had febrile aplasia requiring a short-term antibiotherapy. Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombopenia were also observed related to the chemotherapy. Objective clinical responses were documented in 3 patients and among them 2 occurred in patients injected with cell products harboring two KIR ligand mismatches and one in a patient with one KIR ligand mismatch. Immune monitoring revealed that most patients presented an increase but transient of IL-15 and IL-7 cytokines levels one week after chemotherapy. Furthermore, a high expansion of FoxP3⁺regulatory T cells and PD-1⁺ T cells was observed in all patients, related to IL-2 administration. Our results demonstrated that combining allogeneic NK cells transfer via intra-hepatic artery, cetuximab and a high-dose IL-2 is feasible, well tolerated and may result in clinical responses.

PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: an adaptive immune resistance mechanism to immunogenic chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

Background: Chemotherapy is currently evaluated in order to enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy in colorectal cancer. However, the mechanisms by which these drugs could synergize with ICB remains unclear. The impact of chemotherapy on the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and the resulting anticancer immune responses was assessed in two mouse models of colorectal cancer and validated in tumor samples from metastatic colorectal cancer patients that received neoadjuvant treatment. We demonstrated that 5-Fluorouracil plus Oxaliplatin (Folfox) drove complete tumor cure in mice when combined to anti-PD-1 treatment, while each monotherapy failed. This synergistic effect relies on the ability of Folfox to induce tumor infiltration by activated PD-1⁺ CD8 T cells in a T-bet dependent manner. This effect was concomitantly associated to the expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells driven by IFN-γ secreted by PD-1+ CD8 T cells, indicating that Folfox triggers tumor adaptive immune resistance. Finally, we observed an induction of PD-L1 expression and high CD8 T cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer patients treated by Folfox regimen. Our study delineates a molecular pathway involved in Folfox-induced adaptive immune resistance in colorectal cancer. The results strongly support the use of immune checkpoint blockade therapy in combination with chemotherapies like Folfox.

PD-L1 expression is regulated by both DNA methylation and NF-kB during EMT signaling in non-small cell lung carcinoma

Tumor cells, which undergo Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) acquire increased capacities of proliferation, invasion and have the ability to generate metastases by escaping the immune system during their systemic migration. To escape the immune system, cancer cells may induce tolerance or resist elimination by immune effectors via multiple mechanisms and we hypothesized that EMT may control the expression of immune checkpoint inhibitors, then promoting immune evasion. PD-L1 (programmed cell death ligand 1) but not PD-L2 nor Galectin 9 or Death receptor (DR4, DR5 and Fas) and ligands (FasL and TRAIL) expression was up-regulated during cytokine-driven EMT in a reversible manner. Moreover PD-L1 is overexpressed in VIMENTIN positive NSCLC tissues. We also demonstrated that the expression of PD-L1 required both TNFα and TGFβ1. Indeed, TGFβ1 decreased DNMT1 content and that resulted in PD-L1 promoter demethylation whereas TNFα induced the NF-κB pathway that promoted expression of demethylated PD-L1 promoter.

FOLFIRI3-aflibercept as second- or later-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

817

Background: The efficacy of the standard FOLFIRI-aflibercept second-line therapy may be improved by the chemotherapy regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). FOLFIRI was optimized by splitting the dose of irinotecan on day 1 and day 3 and by removing the bolus of 5-FU in the FOLFIRI3 regimen. Methods: This is a retrospective multicentric cohort, evaluating efficacy and safety of the association of aflibercept with FOLFIRI3, in patients (pts) with previously treated MCRC. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: From September 2014 to December 2016, 74 pts were treated in four French centers. Nine pts were excluded due to prior use of aflibercept (n = 3), more than one prior line of treatment in irinotecan-naïve pts (n = 3) and inadequate liver function (n = 3). In the cohort of irinotecan-naïve pts (n = 30), ORR and DCR were 43.3% and 76.7%. Median PFS and OS were 11.3 months (95% CI 6.1-29.0) and 17.0 months (95% CI 13.0-17.3). The most common ( > 5%) grade 3-4 adverse events were diarrhea (37.9%), neutropenia (14.3%), stomatitis and anemia (10.4%), hypertension (6.7%). In the cohort of pts previously treated with irinotecan (n = 35), 20 (57.1%) pts received ≥2 prior lines of treatment with various prior irinotecan regimen (FOLFIRINOX, n = 21; FOLFIRI, n = 10; FOLFIRI3, n = 4). ORR and DCR were 34.3% and 60.0%. Median PFS and OS were 5.7 months (95% CI 3.9-10.4) and 14.3 months (95% CI 12.8-19.5). In 4 patients refractory to irinotecan, FOLFIRI3-aflibercept led to one partial response, 2 stabilizations, and one patient not evaluable. Conclusions: A minimal modification of the FOLFIRI regimen led to a dramatically improvement of efficacy with FOLFIRI3-aflibercept, whatever prior use of irinotecan. Further randomized trial is planned.