Phase II trial of a novel immunotherapy combination of pembrolizumab and HER2 bi-armed activated T cells (BATs) in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer

97

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have demonstrated only modest efficacy in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Anti-HER2 and Anti-CD3 bispecific antibody armed activated T cells (HER2 BATs) demonstrated efficacy in prostate cancer cell lines, irrespective of HER2 expression status. Safety and preliminary responses in refractory mCRPC were noted in a phase I trial with HER2 BATs. Preclinical synergy was noted in prostate cancer with ICI and BATs. We conducted a phase II study with pembrolizumab and HER2 BATs that would potentially transform immune cells to exhibit cytotoxicity against prostate cancer. Methods: mCRPC patients with 0-1 performance status (PS) and normal liver, kidney and marrow function, pre or post docetaxel chemotherapy were eligible. Primary endpoint was 6 month progression free survival. Patients underwent apheresis for mononuclear cell collection which was shipped to the University of Virginia for manufacturing of HER2 BATs, which were infused twice weekly for 4 weeks. Pembrolizumab was administered every 21 days for a maximum duration of 6 months starting 1 week prior to HER2 BATs infusion. Progression was determined by clinical evaluation, PSA, and radiologic assessment at 3 and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter. Results: Twelve patients have been enrolled on the study of which one withdrew consent. Median age was 69 years (Range 57 to 76 years). Five of 11 patients had prior docetaxel chemotherapy. Eight of 11 patients had bone and lymph node metastases, 1 had lymph node metastases only, and 2 had peritoneal metastasis. Median PSA was 111ng/ml [Range 5.2 - 378 ng/ml]. Five and 6 patients had PS of 0 and 1 respectively. The regimen was well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. To date 3 of 6 patients have completed study treatment and remain progression free at 6 months, 1 death occurred due to an unrelated cause, and 2 patients progressed at 12 weeks of therapy. Two patients demonstrated an 88% and 36% PSA decline. Immune correlates will be presented. Conclusions: The combination regimen of pembrolizumab and BATs appears to be worthy of future exploration in a larger trial in mCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT03406858.

Clinical outcomes of multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant with G-CSF or G-CSF and plerixafor mobilized grafts

Impact of Plerixafor (P) mobilized stem cells on immune reconstitution, such as absolute lymphocyte count at day 30 (ALC30), and on long-term outcomes of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has not been well established. We evaluated total of 469 patients mobilized with G-CSF (G) alone, and 141 patients mobilized with G-CSF plus plerixafor (G+ P). Patients only received plerixafor if they had peripheral blood CD34⁺   blood count <20/μL on first planned day of collection. Primary endpoint, ALC30, was 1.3 K/μL (range, 0.1-4.5) and 1.2 K/μL (range, 0.1-5.1) for G and G + P, respectively (P =. 61). The median PFS was 2.5 years (95% CI, 2.1-3.2) and 2.8 years (95% CI, 2.0-3.3) for G and G + P, respectively (HR: 1.13; 95% CI, 0.84-1.50; P = .42). The median OS was 6.1 years (95% CI, 4.6-NR) for G group compared to 3.7 years (95% CI, 3.2-NR) for the G + P group (HR: 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12-2.40; P = .01). The median follow-up time for OS was 2.53 years (95% CI, 2.13-2.99) and 1.59 years (95% CI, 1.17-2.02) for G and G+ P group, respectively. In this large retrospective analysis of MM patients mobilized with G-CSF vs G-CSF + P, there was no significant difference in lymphocyte recovery or PFS. There was an overall survival difference in patients who were poor mobilizers and could not be mobilized with G-CSF alone.

Liver Graft-Versus-Host Disease is associated with poor survival among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Liver Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is common in patients with post-transplant liver dysfunction following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Oftentimes, the diagnosis is made clinically, and liver biopsy is deferred. Our objective was to evaluate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of liver GVHD among patients who developed post-transplant liver dysfunction. Additionally, we evaluated the feasibility of liver biopsy in this population. We compared outcomes between liver GVHD and a "non-liver GVHD" group, which consisted of other etiologies of post-transplant liver dysfunction. Between January 2003 and December 2010, 249 patients developed post-transplant liver dysfunction following AHSCT: 124 patients developed liver GVHD and 125 were in the "non-liver GVHD" group. The incidence of acute and chronic liver GVHD at one year was 15.7% and 31.0%, respectively. The competing risk analysis revealed full intensity conditioning regimen (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.76; P = .008) and related donor (HR, 1.68; P = .004) as independent risk factors for liver GVHD. The time-varying covariate Cox regression analysis with competing risk event, demonstrated that liver GVHD was independently associated with higher non-relapse mortality, and adverse relapse-free and overall survival. A total of 112 liver biopsies were performed in 100 patients. No major complications were observed. Liver biopsy confirmed prebiopsy hypotheses in 49% of cases, and led to treatment modification in 49% of patients. Our study shows that liver GVHD is associated with adverse survival. Liver biopsy is safe and often helps directing care in this setting.

Phase II clinical trial using anti-CD3 x anti-HER2 bispecific antibody armed activated T cells (HER2 BATs) for HER2-negative (0-2+) metastatic breast cancer

1080

Background: This study presents a phase II cell therapy trial in 32 women with metastatic or locally advanced HER2- breast cancer (BrCa) who received infusions of anti-CD3 x anti-HER2 bispecific antibody armed activated T cells (BATs). This phase II study (NCT 01022138) was conducted to determine if BATs infusions could improve time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS), as well as to confirm the toxicity profile of BATs. Methods: The phase II included 32 patients with a median of 4 lines of therapy (7 TNBC and 25 HR/PR+ HER2- patients) with an average age of 52.5 years (range 28-75 years). Twenty-one patients had ≥3 lines of prior therapy and 11 patients had 1-2 lines. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were stimulated with anti-CD3 antibody and expanded in IL-2, armed with HER2Bi, and aliquoted for the clinical trial. Patients received oncologist’s choice of chemotherapy (4 cycles/4 months) followed by 3 infusions of BATs given once per week for 3 weeks and a boost given 12 weeks after the 3rd infusion. Results: Fifteen of 32 (ORR of 46.8%) who had received any cells had stable disease (SD) at 1 month after the last infusion, and 8 of 15 (25%) had SD > 4 months. For patients who completed 3 or 4 infusions (17-83 x 109 BATs), 8 of 31 patients had TTP > 4 months. One patient completed 2 infusions (17 x 109 BATs). There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). Tumor markers decreased in 13 of 23 (56.5%) patients with evaluable markers. The median OS was 13.8, 16.5, and 12.4 months for all, ER/PR+, and TNBC, respectively. OS for all patients with chemosensitive (chemoS) and chemoresistant (chemoR) disease was 14.6 and 8.6 months (NS), respectively. OS for chemoS and chemoR disease in HER2- ER/PR+ patients was 16.5 and 8.6 months (NS), respectively. OS for chemoS and chemoR disease in TNBC patients was 12.4 and 22.6 months, respectively (NS). The median TTP for all, HER2- ER/PR+, and TNBC patients was 2.7, 2.9, and 1.4 months, respectively. Increases in serum IL-2 and IL-12 were associated with BATs infusions. Conclusions: Targeting HER2- tumors was safe. There were trends toward improved survival in patients who were HER2-/ER/PR+ TNBC, patients who were chemoS, was associated with increased TTP and OS in all groups, and was associated with decreased tumor markers in those who received 4 infusions. Immune studies showed evidence for induction of adaptive immunity directed at breast cancer antigens. Targeting metastatic HER2- BrCa with BATs shows promise. Clinical trial information: NCT 01022138.

Outcomes in large B-cell lymphoma progressing after axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel): Results from the U.S. Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium

7517

Background: Axi-cel, an anti-CD19 CART cell therapy, achieved 83% ORR, 58% CR rate, with 39% PFS at 2 years in patients (pts) with relapsed refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) on the ZUMA-1 study (Locke, Lancet Oncology 2018). Data from a 17-center consortium showed response rates were similar in 274 pts treated with commercial axi-cel (Nastoupil, ASH 2018). Here, we performed retrospective analysis of outcomes in pts with progressive disease (PD) after axi-cel. Methods: Response status was determined by Cheson 2014 and reported as date of radiologic relapse. 274 pts were infused by December 26, 2018 with maximum follow-up of 14 months; 116 pts had PD as of Feb 1, 2019. Twelve sites provided additional data, detailing 85% of PD pts (n=99) with a median time to relapse of 54 days (IQR 16-120). Results: Pre axi-cel pt characteristics: median lines of therapy were 4 (range 2-11), 86% were Stage III/IV and 22% were ECOG >1. Following relapse, 60% (n=61) were biopsied and 70% (43/61) had CD19 expression measured. Thirty percent (13/43) were CD19 negative by: IHC (3/13), flow (2/13) or both (8/13). Seventy percent (n=71) received salvage therapy for PD. Median lines of salvage therapy was 1 (range 0-4). The most common therapies were Lenalidomide-based (30%), checkpoint inhibitors (30%), chemotherapy (20%) and radiation (10%). First salvage therapy ORR by regimen: checkpoint inhibitors = 24%, lenalidomide regimens = 20% and chemotherapy = 11%. One patient received allogeneic transplant. Twelve pts enrolled on clinical trial, with one receiving 2nd CAR-T. Median OS following relapse was 108 days (95% LCL 71). Nineteen pts relapsed <3 months after axi-cel and did not receive therapy with median OS 17 days (95% CI 7-49); 33 pts relapsed <3 months and received therapy with 114 day median OS (95% LCL 82). In contrast, 30 pts who relapsed >3 months post axi-cel and received therapy had estimated median OS >220 days (95% LCL 81). Conclusions: Patients with LBCL relapsing less than 3 months following axi-cel have extremely poor outcomes supporting the development of novel therapies. Therapy for relapse >3 months appears promising. JYS and SD contributed equally; APR, DBM and BTH contributed equally.

Clinical and immune responses using anti-CD3 x anti-EGFR bispecific antibody armed T cells (BATs) for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer

4135

Background: Conventional chemotherapy (chemo) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) has dismal responses and poor survival rates. Arming activated T cells (ATC) with anti-CD3 x anti-EGFR bispecific antibody (BATs) makes every ATC into an EGFR-specific cytotoxic T cell that secretes cytokines, proliferates, and kills tumor. Methods: We report on 5 phase I (P1) and 15 phase II (P2) patients. In our phase I study, BATs were used to treat LAPC or MPC patients at Karmanos Cancer Institute (NCT0140874) in a dose escalation involving 3 weekly infusions of 1, 2, and 4 x 1010 BATs/infusion, followed by a booster infusion at 3 months (mos) for a total of up to 8 x 1010 BATs. No dose limiting toxicities were observed in the outpatient infusions. Fifteen patients treated on a phase II (NCT02620865) at KCI and (NCT03269526) at University of Virginia received biweekly infusions of 1010 BATs/infusion over 4 weeks for a total of 8 x 1010 EGFR BATs. Results: Four patients had stable disease (SD) for 6.1, 6.5, 5.3, and 36 mos. Two patients had complete responses (CR) when chemo was restarted after BATs. The median overall survival (OS) for 17 evaluable patients (3 of 4 infusions in the P1 and all 8 infusions in the P2) was 31 mos, and the median OS for all 20 patients (3 in the P2 who did not complete 8 infusions) is 14.5 mos (95% CI, 7.5-45.2 mos). Patient IT20104 had an apparent “pseudoprogression” after 3 BATs infusions, but achieved a CR after restarting capcitabine and is alive off therapy at 54 mos (24 mos after stopping capecitabine). Immune evaluations on the P1 patients show specific cytotoxicity to MiaPaCa-2 by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) increased from 21% to 31% 2 weeks after the 3rd infusion, and IFN-γ EliSpots increased from < 20 to 1000 IFN-γ EliSpots/106 PBMC (p < 0.03). Patient IT 20121 (SD for 36 mos) increased IFN-γ EliSpots from 250 to 3200/106 PBMC after 8 infusions. Innate cytotoxicity responses in the P1 patients increased significantly after infusions (p < 0.04). Levels of IP-10 increased significantly (p < 0.04), and levels of IL-8 decreased but not significantly (p < 0.07). Conclusions: Infusions of BATs are safe and induce endogenous adaptive anti-tumor responses. Targeting PC with BATs may stabilize disease, leading to improved OS, as well as evidence that BATs infusions can induce anti-tumor activity and immunosensitize tumors to subsequent chemo. Clinical trial information: NCT014084,NCT03269526,NCT02620865.

Outcomes of patients (pts) ≥ 65 years of age in ZUMA-1, a pivotal phase 1/2 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL)

7555

Background: Axi-cel is a US FDA-approved, autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for the treatment of pts with relapsed or refractory LBCL with ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. In the 2-y follow-up of ZUMA-1, the objective response rate (ORR) was 83% with a complete response (CR) rate of 58%, and 39% of pts were in ongoing response (Locke et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). Here we report efficacy and safety outcomes by age. Methods: Eligible pts with refractory LBCL underwent leukapheresis and conditioning chemotherapy followed by a target dose of 2 × 106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg. The Phase 2 primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR. Additional key endpoints were adverse events (AEs), overall survival (OS), and levels of CAR gene-marked cells in peripheral blood. Efficacy was evaluated for Phase 2 pts; safety was evaluated for all treated pts (Phases 1 and 2). Pts were analyzed by ≥ 65 y vs < 65 y of age. Results: As of 8/11/2018, 108 pts were treated. Pts ≥ 65 y (n = 27) vs < 65 y (n = 81) had a median age of 69 y vs 55 y, respectively, were 81% vs 63% male, 70% vs 36% had an IPI score 3-4, 59% vs 57% had ECOG 1, 67% vs 72% had ≥ 3 prior therapies, and median tumor burdens were 3790 mm2 vs 3574 mm2. Median follow-up was 27.1 mo for Phase 2 pts (n = 101). The ORR for pts ≥ 65 y (n = 24) and < 65 y (n = 77) was 92% and 81% (CR rate 75% and 53%), respectively, with ongoing responses in 42% and 38% of pts (ongoing CR 42% and 35%). The 24-mo OS rate was 54% for pts ≥ 65 y and 49% for pts < 65 y. Most pts experienced Grade ≥ 3 AEs (100% of pts ≥ 65 y; 98% of pts < 65 y), and 4% of each group (1/27 pts ≥ 65 y and 3/81 pts < 65 y) died due to AEs as previously reported. Grade ≥ 3 neurologic events and cytokine release syndrome occurred in 44% vs 28% and 7% vs 12% of pts ≥ 65 y vs < 65 y, respectively. CAR T cell expansion by peak level (43 vs 35 cells/μl) or area under the curve (562 vs 448 d × cells/μl) was similar in pts ≥ 65 y vs < 65 y, respectively. Conclusions: The 2-y follow-up of ZUMA-1 demonstrates that axi-cel can induce high rates of durable responses with a manageable safety profile for pts ≥ and < 65 y. Axi-cel offers substantial clinical benefit for older pts with refractory LBCL who otherwise have limited treatment options. Clinical trial information: NCT02348216.

Pre-transplant hypomethylating agents do not influence post-transplant survival in myelodysplastic syndrome

Information on the use of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) as a pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy in MDS is limited. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of 172 adult MDS patients, who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between January 2000 and December 2016. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 - pre-transplant blasts <5% with HMA (n = 42), group 2 - pre-transplant blasts ≥5% with HMA (n = 38), group 3 - no HMA (n = 92). With a median follow up of 4.08 years, 1-year survival and relapse rates for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 75%, 40.2%, and 60.71%, respectively; and 17.6%, 26.6%, and 9.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed adverse relapse (HR 3.54; p = .03) in group 2 compared to groups 1 and 3, while no difference in overall survival was noticed. Our study shows no survival association with pre-transplant HMA; although, higher relapse rate was observed in the non-responding patients indicating possible chemotherapy resistant disease.

Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial

BACKGROUND

Axicabtagene ciloleucel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. In the previous analysis of the ZUMA-1 registrational study, with a median follow-up of 15·4 months (IQR 13·7-17·3), 89 (82%) of 108 assessable patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel achieved an objective response, and complete responses were noted in 63 (58%) patients. Here we report long-term activity and safety outcomes of the ZUMA-1 study.

METHODS

ZUMA-1 is a single-arm, multicentre, registrational trial at 22 sites in the USA and Israel. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, and had histologically confirmed large B-cell lymphoma-including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, and transformed follicular lymphoma-according to the 2008 WHO Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissue; refractory disease or relapsed after autologous stem-cell transplantation; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; and had previously received an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody containing-regimen and an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. Participants received one dose of axicabtagene ciloleucel on day 0 at a target dose of 2 × 10⁶ CAR T cells per kg of bodyweight after conditioning chemotherapy with intravenous fludarabine (30 mg/m² body-surface area) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m² body-surface area) on days -5, -4, and -3. The primary endpoints were safety for phase 1 and the proportion of patients achieving an objective response for phase 2, and key secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, and duration of response. Pre-planned activity and safety analyses were done per protocol. ZUMA-1 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02348216. Although the registrational cohorts are closed, the trial remains open, and recruitment to extension cohorts with alternative endpoints is underway.

FINDINGS

Between May 19, 2015, and Sept 15, 2016, 119 patients were enrolled and 108 received axicabtagene ciloleucel across phases 1 and 2. As of the cutoff date of Aug 11, 2018, 101 patients assessable for activity in phase 2 were followed up for a median of 27·1 months (IQR 25·7-28·8), 84 (83%) had an objective response, and 59 (58%) had a complete response. The median duration of response was 11·1 months (4·2-not estimable). The median overall survival was not reached (12·8-not estimable), and the median progression-free survival was 5·9 months (95% CI 3·3-15·0). 52 (48%) of 108 patients assessable for safety in phases 1 and 2 had grade 3 or worse serious adverse events. Grade 3 or worse cytokine release syndrome occurred in 12 (11%) patients, and grade 3 or worse neurological events in 35 (32%). Since the previous analysis at 1 year, additional serious adverse events were reported in four patients (grade 3 mental status changes, grade 4 myelodysplastic syndrome, grade 3 lung infection, and two episodes of grade 3 bacteraemia), none of which were judged to be treatment related. Two treatment-related deaths (due to haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and cardiac arrest) were previously reported, but no new treatment-related deaths occurred during the additional follow-up.

INTERPRETATION

These 2-year follow-up data from ZUMA-1 suggest that axicabtagene ciloleucel can induce durable responses and a median overall survival of greater than 2 years, and has a manageable long-term safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

FUNDING

Kite and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program.

Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

In a phase 1 trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, showed efficacy in patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma after the failure of conventional therapy.

METHODS

In this multicenter, phase 2 trial, we enrolled 111 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or transformed follicular lymphoma who had refractory disease despite undergoing recommended prior therapy. Patients received a target dose of 2×106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells per kilogram of body weight after receiving a conditioning regimen of low-dose cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. The primary end point was the rate of objective response (calculated as the combined rates of complete response and partial response). Secondary end points included overall survival, safety, and biomarker assessments.

RESULTS

Among the 111 patients who were enrolled, axi-cel was successfully manufactured for 110 (99%) and administered to 101 (91%). The objective response rate was 82%, and the complete response rate was 54%.With a median follow-up of 15.4 months, 42% of the patients continued to have a response, with 40% continuing to have a complete response. The overall rate of survival at 18 months was 52%. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher during treatment were neutropenia (in 78% of the patients), anemia (in 43%), and thrombocytopenia (in 38%). Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome and neurologic events occurred in 13% and 28% of the patients, respectively. Three of the patients died during treatment. Higher CAR T-cell levels in blood were associated with response.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter study, patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received CAR T-cell therapy with axi-cel had high levels of durable response, with a safety profile that included myelosuppression, the cytokine release syndrome, and neurologic events. (Funded by Kite Pharma and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program; ZUMA-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02348216 .).

Cost effectiveness of G-CSF after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplant

e18540

Background: In spite of the fact G-CSF has been used post stem cell transplant (SCT) to accelerate neutrophil engraftment its use post allogeneic SCT remains controversial. ASCO does not recommend its use after allogeneic SCT. To further evaluate the effectiveness of its use, we compared outcomes in pts who underwent related and unrelated peripheral blood SCT(PBSCT) either with or without the use of G-CSF post SCT. Methods: This is a retrospective study comparing early outcomes in pts who received G-CSF starting on day + 6 post SCT until engraftment with pts who did not receive a planned course of G-CSF. Pts who underwent Allogeneic PBSCT between 2012-2014 at our institution were included. Pts who received marrow, haploidentical or cord blood transplants were excluded. Associations with survival outcomes were assessed by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional regression models. Results: A total of 162 patients were evaluated. Sixty-five pts received G-CSF post SCT and 97 did not. The only difference between the two groups was that more pts in the G-CSF group received myeloablative-conditioning (MAC) regimen (78% vs. 55%, p = 0.008). Other pt characteristics were not significantly different. Length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the G-CSF group (24 vs. 27 days P = 0.002). Pts who received G-CSF had earlier neutrophil engraftment (median, days 11 vs. 14 p = < 0.001). The median day of platelet engraftment was 15 days in both groups. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in re-admissions in the first 100 days, and the incidence of acute or chronic GVHD. In multivariate analysis use of G-CSF did not significantly impact non- relapse mortality, relapse free survival and overall survival. However, relapse rate was significantly lower in G-CSF group in multivariable analysis (hazards ratio = 0.44, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Use of G-CSF post allogeneic PBSCT is associated with earlier neutrophil engraftment, shorter hospital stay and a suggestion of a reduced relapse rate after PBSCT. Our experience suggests that use of G-CSF (on average for approximately 5 days) in this setting is cost effective as it reduces hospitalization duration without adversely impacting post-transplant outcomes.

Long term follow up of patients with locally advanced triple negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation: A single center experience

e12590

Background: Adjuvant high dose chemotherapy (HDC) with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (AuSCT) as part treatment of high risk locally advanced breast cancer has remained controversial. Multiple trials reported disease free survival (DFS) without Overall survival (OS) resulting in its abandonment in early 2000s. However, post hoc analysis of these trials consistently reported DFS and OS benefit in young and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subgroups. This has not been re-evaluated till date. Recent European registry reports coupled with improved transplant related mortality (TRM) and still poor out-come of standard of care in TNBC subgroup has generated renewed interest. We report long term out-come of locally advanced high risk TNBC treated with HDC and AuSCT treated in Karmanos Cancer Institute from 1995 to 2001 Methods: Majority of the patients were treated with Adriamycin and Taxane based induction chemotherapy. Patients without evidence of metastatic disease proceeded to HDC and AuSCT using Carmustine 600mg/sqm Cyclophosphamide 5.6gm/sqm and Cisplatin 165mg/sqm (STAMP 1 regimen). This is followed with loco- regional radiation per protocol. Results: 72 hormone negative patients with Lymph Node(LN) > 4 or inflammatory breast cancers were selected from 576 treated for advanced or metastatic breast cancer. 33 patients were TNB with HER2 status of 39 patients unknown. Median time from diagnosis to stem cell transplantation was 6 months. Median age at diagnosis was 47yrs. Mean LN involvement was 9 with 90% having (4-20) LN positivity. With median follow up of 16 years,10yrs DFS and OS were both 62.5%. Median follow up for DFS and OS was not reached.TRM was 9% mostly from pulmonary toxicity. Conclusions: This study of locally advanced high risk TNBC treated with adjuvant HDC and AuSCT have high 10yr OS of 62.5% compared to current standard of care. With the current improvement in TRM, reevaluation of this strategy through clinical trials in this subgroup whose outcome remain poor is reasonable.

Effect of lenalidomide use as part of induction chemotherapy on the risk of peri-transplant venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma

e19524

Background: Lenalidomide (len) is approved for treatment in Multiple Myeloma (MM) Use of len has been associated with an increase in venous thrombotic events (VTE) and aspirin prophylaxis is recommended for pts who are on active treatment with len. Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is used during the treatmentof MM after initial induction therapy. The use of intravenous catheters and hospitalization increase the risk of VTE in peri-transplant period. We evaluated the incidence of VTE in peri-transplant period to determine if len use increased the risk of VTE. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of pts with MM who underwent first ASCT at our institution between 1/2011-1/2015.Data was collected on pt. demographics, len use, VTE prophylaxis, VTE incidence and VTE treatment. Chemical anticoagulation during the peri-transplant period was based on physician preference and chemical anticoagulation was stopped once platelet counts dropped below 50,000/ uL. All pts were encouraged to ambulate daily for mechanical prophylaxis. Associations with incidence of VTE were conducted by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 303 pts met the study criteria. 204 pts received Len as part of induction treatment while 99 did not. There was no significant difference in demographics of the 2 groups. 87% pts in the Len group and 81% in the non-Len group did not receive any chemical prophylaxis, respectively during hospitalization. 15 pts developed DVT within 100 days of transplant: 10 in len group and 5 in non-len group (p > 0.99). 14 of the 15 were catheter associated. Median time to DVT was 10.5 days post-transplant. Caucasians had a higher risk of DVT; adjusted OR 0.315 (95%CI 0.03-0.99; p = 0.046). Incidence of VTE was not affected by prophylaxis, or response to induction. Conclusions: Despite the fact that during the peri-transplant period most of the patients were not on prophylactic chemical anticoagulation due to chemotherapy associated thrombocytopenia len use during the induction treatment did not increase the risk of peri-transplant VTE.