Catheter ablation supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation -last resort treatment of arrhythmic storm?

Introduction

Arrhythmic storm (AS) is associated with high mortality, even with best medical care and hemodynamic support. If medical therapeutic failure, electrophysiological mapping and ablation are potential lifesaving therapies. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides temporary mechanical circulatory support and can be used as a salvage intervention in patients with cardiogenic shock. Considering the seriousness of AS and the technical complexity involved, catheter ablation supported by VA-ECMO is infrequently performed. We sought to assess the safety and effectiveness of emergent catheter ablation procedures performed in patients on VA-ECMO at our hospital.

Methods

Retrospective study of all ventricular tachycardia (VT) catheter ablation procedures performed with VA-ECMO support at a tertiary centre between 2016 and 2020. Follow-up data was obtained from review of electronical records.

Results

Five patients underwent 6 emergent VT ablation procedures due to AS. The median age was 62 years (range, 52) and 4 patients were men. Three patients had VT at admission, while 2 were admitted with an acute coronary syndrome and developed VT during the hospitalization. Four patients had ischemic heart disease, though only 1 had previous history of VT; the remaining patient presented no structural heart disease. Median left ventricle ejection fraction was 11% (range 30).

All patients had incomplete response to amiodarone, lidocaine or overdrive pacing, before being proposed to catheter ablation. Four patients were on ECMO support before ablation, while 1 was cannulated during the procedure due to hemodynamic instability. Ablation was performed using a retrograde approach in 3 patients, and combined retrograde and transeptal access in 2; one patient had epicardial ablation after unsuccessful endovascular approach. Three patients had left ventricle substrate ablation and the remaining 2 of the right ventricle. No major complications were seen directly related to the procedures.

The median length of stay in intensive care unit was 22 days (range 41 days). Weaning of VA-ECMO was accomplished in all patients. Two patient died during the same hospitalization (one due to uncontrolled arrhythmic events). At a median 23 months (range 31) of follow-up of the surviving patients, two had recurrence of VT but no one had return of AS.

Conclusion

In our sample VT ablation on VA-ECMO support was a safe procedure, with no immediate complications. However, as reported in the literature, a high mortality rate was observed both in-hospital and during follow-up, mostly related to advanced structural heart disease. Also, considerable VT recurrence rates were seen, but with no re-hospitalization. Our experience shows that catheter ablation is a life-saving procedure in otherwise uncontrollable AS and allowed absolute success in weaning VA-ECMO.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Validation of a novel framework defining the acceptable standard of care for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Background

In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), uptitration of neurohormonal antagonists to trial-proven doses shown to reduce mortality is challenging and seldomly achieved in clinical practice. A major reason for underdosing of these agents is the lack of a clear description of what constitutes an acceptable standard of care in HFrEF. To address this limitation, a novel framework for describing the physician adherence to evidence-based treatment was recently proposed. The aim of our study was to evaluate and validate the proposed framework in a real-world population of patients with HFrEF.

Methods

A cohort of patients with HFrEF, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, under treatment with neurohormonal antagonists for at least 3 months were retrospectively identified at a tertiary hospital's Heart Failure Clinic. Demographic, clinical, echocardiographic and treatment data were assessed. Patients were divided in three strata for each neurohormonal antagonist, according to the proposed framework: Status I – patients receiving target doses or the highest tolerated dose; Status II – use of subtarget doses for reasons unrelated to clinically important intolerance; and Status III – not receiving the drug at any dose. The prognostic value of each strata was assessed for all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 408 patients (mean age 68±12 years, 78% male, 63% ischemic etiology) were included. The median LVEF was 31% (IQR 25–36) and most patients were in NYHA class II or III [210 (51.5%) and 163 (40%), respectively]. Medical therapy is described in Table 1. During a median follow-up of 3.3 years (IQR 1.4–5.6), 210 patients died. On univariable analysis, achieving Status I of beta-blocker (BB) therapy (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.32–0.81; P=0.004) or ACEi/ARB (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.36–0.86; P=0.012) was associated with reduced all-cause mortality. The mortality of patients in Status II of BB or ACEi/ARB was similar to the mortality of those not receiving the drug (HR for BB: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.53–1.52; P=0.69 and HR for ACEi/ARB: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.42–1.18; P=0.182) – figure 1. Achieving Status I of BB remained independently associated with reduced mortality after adjustment for several clinical and echocardiographic confounders (n=13) (adjusted HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.35–0.98; P=0.041).

Conclusions

In this real-world population of patients with HFrEF, the vast majority of patients were in Status I of BB and ACEi/ARB therapy. Achieving Status I of BB therapy seems to be associated with reduced mortality, even after adjustment for several markers of disease severity, highlighting the need for uptitration of medical therapy to maximal tolerated doses according to trial-proven regimens.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery with interarterial course: red flag or innocent bystander?

Aims

Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the opposite sinus (right-ACAOS) with interarterial course (IAC) has been associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Widespread use of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has led to increasing recognition of this condition, even among healthy individuals. Our study sought to examine the prevalence, anatomical characteristics and outcomes of right-ACAOS with IAC in patients undergoing CCTA for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods and results

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred for CCTA at one tertiary hospital from January 2012 to December 2020. Right-ACAOS with IAC patients were analyzed for cardiac symptoms and long-term occurrence of first MACE (SCD, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or revascularization of the anomalous vessel). CCTAs were reviewed for anatomical high-risk features and concomitant CAD. Among 10928 patients referred for CCTA, 28 patients with right-ACAOS with IAC were identified. Mean age was 55±17 years, 64% were male and 11 (39.3%) presented with stable cardiac symptoms. Most patients had at least one high risk anatomical feature. During follow-up, there were no CV deaths or aborted SCD episodes and only 1 patient underwent surgical revascularization of the anomalous vessel.

Conclusion

Right-ACAOS with IAC is an uncommon finding (prevalence of 0.26%). In a contemporary population of predominantly asymptomatic patients who survived this condition well into adulthood, most patients were managed conservatively with a low event rate. Additional studies are needed to support medical follow-up as the preferred option in this setting.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Incorporating coronary calcification into pretest assessment of the likelihood of coronary artery disease: validation and recalibration of a new diagnostic tool

Background

A new clinical tool was recently proposed to improve the estimation of pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) by incorporating coronary artery calcium score (CACS) with clinical risk factors. This new model (Clinical+CACS) showed improved prediction when compared to the method recommended by the 2019 ESC guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes, but was never tested or adjusted for use in our population. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of this new method in a Portuguese cohort of symptomatic patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and to recalibrate it if necessary.

Methods

We conducted a two-center cross-sectional study assessing symptomatic patients who underwent CCTA for suspected CAD. Key exclusion criteria were age <30 years, known CAD, suspected acute coronary syndrome, or symptoms other than chest pain or dyspnea. Obstructive CAD was defined as any luminal stenosis ≥50% on CCTA. The Clinical+CACS prediction model was assessed for discrimination and calibration. A logistical recalibration of the model was conducted in a random sample of 50% of the patients and subsequently validated in the other half.

Results

A total of 1910 patients (mean age 60±11 years, 60% women) were included in the analysis. Symptom characteristics were: 39% non-anginal chest pain, 30% atypical angina, 19% dyspnea and 12% typical angina. The observed prevalence of obstructive CAD was 12.9% (n=247). Patients with obstructive CAD were more often male, were significantly older, had higher prevalence of typical angina and cardiovascular risk factors, and higher CACS values. The new Clinical+CACS tool showed greater discriminative power than the ESC 2019 prediction model, with a C-statistic of 0.83 (CI 95% 0.81–0.86) versus 0.67 (CI 95% 0.64–0.71), respectively (p-value for comparison <0.001). Before recalibration, the Clinical+CACS model underestimated the likelihood of CAD in our population across all quartiles of pretest probability (mean relative underestimation of 49%), which was subsequently corrected by the recalibration procedure - Figure.

Conclusions

In a Portuguese cohort of symptomatic patients undergoing CCTA for suspected CAD, the new Clinical+CACS model showed better discrimination power than the 2019 ESC method. The underestimation of the Clinical+CACS model was corrected by recalibrating it for our population. This new tool might prove useful for guiding decisions on the need for further testing.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

The gray zone of myocardial fibrosis is a better predictor of ventricular arrhythmias than total myocardial fibrosis in patients with previous myocardial infarction

Background

Current sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification relies heavily on the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but markers that could refine risk assessment are needed. Total fibrosis mass (TFM) and “gray zone” of myocardial fibrosis (GZF) on late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) have been proposed as potential arrhythmogenic substrates. The aim of our study was to determine whether TFM and GZF can predict the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with previous myocardial infarction.

Methods

We performed a single centre retrospective study enrolling all consecutive patients with previous myocardial infarction undergoing LGE-CMR before implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation for primary or secondary prevention. TFM and GZF were defined as myocardial tissue with signal-intensities >6 SD and 2–6 SD above the mean of reference myocardium, respectively. The primary endpoint was a composite of sudden arrhythmic death, appropriate ICD shock, ventricular fibrillation (VF), or sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) as detected by the device.

Results

A total of 55 patients (mean age 62±12 years, 87% male, mean LVEF 30% ± 8%) were included. During a mean follow-up period of 34±15 months, 10 patients reached the primary endpoint (8 appropriate ICD shock, 2 sustained VT or VF). Patients who attained the primary endpoint had similar TFM (28.6g ± 14.5 vs. 23.1g ± 14.5; P=0.283) but larger GZF (25.3g ± 11.0 vs 15.6g ± 7.3; P=0.001). After adjustment for LVEF, GZF remained independently associated with the composite arrhythmic endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03–1.17; P=0.005), whereas TFM did not (aHR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.98–1.06; P=0.394). Decision tree analysis identified 16.4g of GZF as the best cut-off to predict life-threatening arrhythmic events. The primary endpoint occurred in 9 out of the 22 patients (41%) with GZF >16.4g, but in only 1 of the 33 patients (3%) with GZF ≤16.4g – Figure.

Conclusions

The extent of GZF seems to be a better predictor of ventricular arrhythmias than TFM. This LGE-CMR parameter may be useful to identify a subgroup of patients with previous myocardial infarction at an increased risk of life-threatening arrhythmic events.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

The odyssey to dethrone LV ejection fraction continues: the prognostic value of LV global function index in heart failure

Background

Left Ventricular (LV) Global Function index (LVGFi) is a parameter that combines data from global systolic performance and volumetric anatomical information, measurable by non-contrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR). We aimed to evaluate whether LVGFi predicts major cardiovascular outcomes and outperforms LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in Heart Failure (HF).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective single-centre study of consecutive patients with HF who were referred to and had a LVEF <50% at CMR. Other than inadequate images for endocardial or epicardial border delineation, there were no exclusion criteria. LVEF was determined by 3D measurement. LVGFi was calculated as the LV stroke volume to the LV global volume ratio (Figure 1). The primary endpoint was a composite of time to all-cause death or HF hospitalization.

Results

The cohort was comprised of 433 HF patients (mean age 64±12 years, 74.1% male, ischaemic HF 53.1%, NYHA I-II 83.9%) with a mean LVEF of 33.5±10.0% and LVGFi of 22.8±7.4%. Over a median follow-up of 27 (17–37) months, 85 (19.6%) met the primary endpoint and 42 (9.7%) died. Patients with an event of the primary endpoint had markers of more severe HF, as noted by a reduced functional capacity (NYHA I-II: 63.5 vs. 89.0%; p<0.001) and increased natriuretic peptides [NT-proBNP: 2664 (1022–27242) vs. 791 (337–7258); p<0.001). Likewise, CMR showed higher LV volumes (e.g., LV end-diastolic volume index: 137±50 vs. 120±43mL/m2; p=0.001) and reduced LV performance indices, namely LVEF (29.2±10.6 vs 34.5±9.6%; p<0.001) and LVGFi (19.8±7.4 vs 23.6±7.3%; p<0.001). Both LVEF and LVGFi independently predicted the primary endpoint in multivariate analysis (separately imputed into a model adjusted for NYHA, NT-proBNP and creatinine). The LVEF model was more powerful than that of LVGFi. Similarly, LVGFi did not provide incremental prognostic information over LVEF in c-statistics analysis (0.653 vs. 0.622; p=0.645) (Figure 2).

Conclusion

While LVGFi independently predicted major outcomes in patients with HF and LVEF <50%, it did not surpass LVEF. Our findings contrast to those demonstrating LVGFi as a powerful variable that outperforms LVEF in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, and healthy subjects at risk of developing structural heart disease. We hypothesize that LVGFi might be primarily useful in the prognostic stratification of patients with preserved LVEF.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1Figure 2

Coronary artery calcium score to predict coronary CT angiography interpretability: an old problem revisited

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Introduction

Clinical guidelines recommend against the use of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with heavy calcification due to interpretability concerns, but no specific approach or threshold is provided. Recently, alternative methods have been proposed as more reliable predictors of CCTA interpretability than the classic coronary artery calcium score (CACS).  The purpose this study was to compare the performance of different measures of coronary calcification as predictors of CCTA interpretability.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing CACS and CCTA between 2018 and 2020. The key exclusion criteria were known coronary artery disease, CACS of zero, and presence of non-assessable coronary lesions for reasons other than calcification (movement/gating artifacts or vessel diameter < 2mm). CCTA studies were considered non-interpretable if the main reader considered one or more coronary lesions non-assessable due to calcification. Three different measures of coronary calcification were compared using ROC curve analysis: 1) total CACS; 2) CACS-to-lesion ratio (total CACS divided by the number of calcified plaques); and 3) calcium score of the most calcified plaque. Decision-tree analysis was performed to identify the algorithm that best predicts CCTA interpretability.

Results

A total of 432 patients (191 women, mean age 64 ± 11 years) were included. Overall, 31 patients (7.2%) had a non-interpretable CCTA due to calcification. Patients with non-interpretable CCTA had higher CACS (median 589 vs. 50 AU, p < 0.001), higher CACS-to-lesion ratio (median 43 vs. 14 AU/lesion, p < 0.001), and higher score of the most calcified plaque (median 445 vs. 43 AU, p < 0.001). Among the 3 methods, CACS showed the highest discriminative power to predict a non-interpretable CCTA (C-statistic 0.93, 95%CI 0.89-0.95, p < 0.001) - Figure.

Decision-tree analysis identified a single-variable algorithm (CACS value ≤ 515 AU) as the best discriminator of CCTA interpretability: 396 of the 409 patients (97%) with CACS ≤ 515 AU had an interpretable CCTA, whereas only 5 of the 23 patients (22%) with CACS > 515 AU had an interpretable test, yielding a total of 96% correct predictions.

Conclusions

The recently proposed and more complex measures of coronary calcification seem unable to outperform total CACS as a predictor of CCTA interpretability. A simple CACS cutoff-value around 500 AU remains the best discriminator for this purpose.

Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery with interarterial course: red flag or innocent bystander?

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery (right ACAOS) with interarterial course (IAC) has been associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Widespread use of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has led to increasing recognition of this condition, even among healthy individuals. This study sought to examine the prevalence, anatomical characteristics and outcomes of right ACAOS with IAC in patients undergoing CCTA for all-indications.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred for CCTA at one tertiary hospital between January 2012 and December 2020. Right ACAOS patients with IAC were analyzed for cardiac symptoms (anginal chest pain, syncope, aborted SCD) and long-term outcomes were evaluated for myocardial infarction, ischemic test results, revascularization procedures and all-cause or cardiovascular (CV) mortality. CCTAs were reviewed for proposed high-risk features (ie., take-off angle, length and severity of proximal narrowing, intramural course, interarterial length) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD). Association between high-risk features was analyzed. Long-term outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Among 10,928 patients referred for CCTA during the study period, we identified 28 patients (0.3% prevalence) with right ACAOS and IAC. Mean age was 55 ± 17 years, 64% were male and 11 (39.3%) presented cardiac symptoms. During a median follow-up of 44.1 ± 31.8 months, there were no CV deaths and only 1 patient (3.65%) underwent surgical revascularization. Baseline characteristics and CCTA findings are presented in figure 1.

Conclusion

Right ACAOS and IAC is an uncommon finding, with an observed prevalence of 0.3%. CCTA provides excellent anatomical characterization of anomalous vessels, including suggested high-risk features. In a population of asymptomatic patients who survived this condition well into adulthood, the risk of events was very low and medical follow up might be a reasonable option.

Incorporating coronary calcification into pretest assessment of the likelihood of coronary artery disease: validation and recalibration of a new diagnostic tool

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

A new clinical tool was recently proposed to improve the estimation of pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) by incorporating coronary artery calcium score (CACS) with clinical risk factors. This new model (Clinical + CACS) showed improved prediction when compared to the method recommended by the 2019 ESC guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes, but was never tested or adjusted for use in our population. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of this new method in a Portuguese cohort of symptomatic patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and to recalibrate it if necessary.

Methods

We conducted a two-center cross-sectional study assessing symptomatic patients who underwent CCTA for suspected CAD. Key exclusion criteria were age < 30 years, known CAD, suspected acute coronary syndrome, or symptoms other than chest pain or dyspnea. Obstructive CAD was defined as any luminal stenosis ≥50% on CCTA. The Clinical + CACS prediction model was assessed for discrimination and calibration. A logistical recalibration of the model was conducted in a random sample of 50% of the patients and subsequently validated in the other half.

Results

A total of 1910 patients (mean age 60 ± 11 years, 60% women) were included in the analysis. Symptom characteristics were: 39% non-anginal chest pain, 30% atypical angina, 19% dyspnea and 12% typical angina. The observed prevalence of obstructive CAD was 12.9% (n = 247). Patients with obstructive CAD were more often male, were significantly older, had higher prevalence of typical angina and cardiovascular risk factors, and higher CACS values. The new Clinical + CACS tool showed greater discriminative power than the ESC 2019 prediction model, with a C-statistic of 0.83 (CI 95% 0.81-0.86) versus 0.67 (CI 95% 0.64-0.71), respectively (p-value for comparison < 0.001). Before recalibration, the Clinical + CACS model underestimated the likelihood of CAD in our population across all quartiles of pretest probability (mean relative underestimation of 49%), which was subsequently corrected by the recalibration procedure - Figure.

Conclusions

In a Portuguese cohort of symptomatic patients undergoing CCTA for suspected CAD, the new Clinical + CACS model showed better discrimination power than the 2019 ESC method. The underestimation of the Clinical + CACS model was corrected by recalibrating it for our population. This new tool might prove useful for guiding decisions on the need for further testing.

Three-dimensional late gadolinium enhancement increases the diagnostic yield of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to detect low voltage in the right ventricular outflow tract

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) fails to detect scar tissue in patients with electroanatomical abnormalities and biopsy-proven structural heart disease. It has shown conflicting data regarding existence of structural abnormalities in patients with idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). Three- dimensional (3D) LGE enables high-spatial resolution more appropriate to the thin-walled right ventricle than two-dimensional (2D) LGE.

Objective

Our aim was to evaluate if the use of 3D-LGE would improve the performance of CMR to detect low voltage areas in the RVOT of patients with PVCs.

Methods

Since May 2020 we performed 3D-LGE CMR in 11 consecutive patients that underwent ablation of frequent PVCs. A control group of 11 consecutive patients that underwent catheter ablation by the same operator and had a 2D-LGE CMR performed before ablation was also studied. All patients had normal 2D-LGE CMR. A 3D electroanatomical bipolar voltage map of the RVOT was performed in sinus rhythm (0.5 mV-1.5 mV colour display). Areas with electrograms <1.5 mV represented the LVA. The area adjacent to the pulmonary valve usually displays voltage between 0.5 and 1.5 mV and is classified as transitional-voltage zone. Presence of LVAs outside this transitional-voltage zone were estimated.  We compared the accuracy of CMR for detecting LVA in the two groups: 3D LGE and 2D LGE.

Results

The median number of points used for the voltage map was 344 (242-450). 18 patients (82%) displayed LVAs. The site of origin of the PVCs was the RVOT in 17 patients and the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) in 5. Comparison between groups is displayed in the table.  2D LGE CMR failed to demonstrate abnormalities of the RVOT in any of the patients that presented with LVAs. 3D CMR showed presence of fibrosis (Figure) in 3 out of 9 patients with LVAs (33%).

Conclusion

CMR using 3-D LGE techniques showed an increased power to diagnose structural abnormalities. This technique may be a better choice in initial stages of RVOT disease. All sampleN = 223D-LGE CMRN = 112D-LGE CMRN = 11p-valueAge in years, median (Q1-Q3)47 (35-68)62 (34-55)42 (34-55)0.243Male gender, n (%)8 (36)3 (27)5 (46)0.330PVCs RVOT/LVOT17/59/28/30.500Nº points in the map, median (Q1-Q3)344 (242-450)350 (259-450)300 (158-345)0.076Low voltage areas, n (%)18 (82)9 (82)9 (82)0.707Abstract Figure.

Comparing single approaches success in index atrial fibrillation ablation

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Introduction

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablation can be performed by inducing pulmonary vein electrical isolation. There are two widely used approaches: point-by-point and single-shot.  Catheter AF ablation is effective in restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm. However, efficacy is limited by high rate of AF recurrence, after an initially successful procedure.

Purpose

To evaluate AF index ablation successfulness using single-shot techniques and compare them to conventional one (point-by-point using irrigated- tip ablation catheter).

Methods

We analyzed, from a single center, all patients submitted to an index AF ablation procedure and its successfulness. The last was defined as AF, atrial tachycardia or flutter recurrence (with a duration superior to 30seconds) event- free survival, determined by holter and/or event recorder. These exams were performed after 6 and 12months and then annually, until 5years post procedure were accomplished.

Results

From November 2004 to November 2020, 821patients were submitted to first AF ablation (male patients 67,2%(N = 552), mean age of 59 ± 12years old). Paroxysmal AF(PAF) was present in 62,9%(N = 516), with short-duration persistent AF in 21,8%(N = 179) and long-standing persistent in 15,3%(N = 126). Ablation techniques were irrigated tip catheter point-by-point (PbP)ablation in 266 patients (32,4%) and single-shot (SS)techniques on the remaining 555(67,6%), including PVAC in 294(35,8%),225(27,4%) submitted to cryoablation and 36(4,4%) to nMARQ.

Globally, AF ablation had one-year success rate of 72,5%, and 56,2% at 3 years. A significant difference between AF duration type was found: Arrhythmic recurrence risk was 58% higher in persistent AF(PeAF) (HR 1.58;95%IC 1,22-2,04; p < 0.001). In patients presenting with PAF prior to the procedure, success was significantly higher in those submitted to SS technique(HR:0.69;95%CI 0,47-0,90;p = 0.046), while those with PeAF had similar results.

Conclusion

In this single center analysis almost three-quarters had achieved one-year event-free survival, and more than a half reached long-term freedom from atrial arrhythmia. Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation submitted to single-shot procedure presented with a higher success-rate. Moreover, our study confirmed previous data on the importance of atrial fibrillation classification to postprocedural outcomes. Abstract Figure. Survival Curves

Anxiety and need for support of college students during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: An exploratory study

Introduction

During the pandemic state, college students are exposed to additional stressful factors, including but not limited to: fear of being infected; fear of infecting a significant person; deal with a new reality of economic uncertainty; challenges of distance education; new rules in face-to-face classes; restrictions on access to internships and higher demanding in internships.

Objectives

This exploratory study aims to assess levels of anxiety and the perception of the need for support of students of a Portuguese Higher Education Institution (HEI).

Methods

An exploratory study was developed, on the return of students to the presential classes after the academic lockdown. It was spread out an email for all students with a link for an online form, which includes sociodemographic questions, a screening question of the anxiety level, and the need for support level (rating scales 0-10).

Results

It was obtained 36 answers from mostly female students (92%) with 17 to 21 years old (67%). Answers present an average anxiety level of 5.4 (Min=1; Max=9; SD=2.23), with 58% of answers with a score of anxiety level of 5 or higher. The need for support average was 3.7 (Min=1; Max=9; SD=2.23), with 33% of answers with a score of 5 or higher.

Conclusions

It is necessary to continuously monitor the anxiety level and the need for support of college students during the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic. It is similarly relevant to have responses of HEI to promote mental health and to answer to the high levels of students’ anxiety and needs for support during the pandemic.

Stress, health and lifestyle behaviours during COVID-19 home confinement in portuguese adults

Introduction

The confinement associated with COVID-19 pandemic was an experience with significant physical and mental health implications, including higher stress levels, decreased sleep quality, pain symptoms and changes in lifestyle behaviours.

Objectives

The main goal of this study was to analyze the relationship between stress and health variables (sleep, health symptoms, health perception, and lifestyle behaviours) in a Portuguese university during COVID-19 home confinement.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey design was conducted. A sample of 263 Portuguese workers (64.3% females), with mean age of 48.3 years (sd=8.9), filled in the PSS10, answering questions concerning health symptoms (perceived health, pain symptoms and fatigue), lifestyle behaviours (sleep and eating habits, use of alcohol and tobacco) during COVID-19 home confinement. A descriptive statistical analysis, a Pearson correlation analyses and the t Student test, for independent samples, were performed.

Results

The results showed significant correlations between stress and perceived health (r=-.404; p<.0001), arms pain (r=.212; p=.002), legs pain (r=.201; p=.003), back pain (r=.219; p=.001), headache (r=.289; p<.0001) and fatigue (r=.295; p<.0001). Concerning lifestyle behaviours, the results showed significant correlations between stress and sleep (r=-.552; p<.0001) and stress is significantly higher (p<.0001) in individuals who have changed their eating habits.

Conclusions

During the COVID-19 home confinement, higher stress levels are associated with a worse perception of health, more pain symptoms (legs, arms, back, headache), worse sleep quality and more fatigue. Moreover, the individuals with higher levels of stress have changed their eating habits. Lastly, health promotion interventions are needed in order to minimize the impact of home confinement in health.

Adapting the concepts of proportionate and disproportionate functional mitral regurgitation to clinical practice

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

  Despite its theoretical appeal, the concept of Proportionate and Disproportionate FMR has been limited by the lack of a simple way to assess it and by the paucity of data showing its prognostic superiority over currently established ways of grading FMR.

Objectives

This study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of a new and individualized method of assessing Functional Mitral Regurgitation (FMR) Proportionality.

Methods

Patients with at least mild FMR and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (&lt; 50%) under optimal guideline-directed medical therapy were retrospectively identified at a single-center. To determine FMR proportionality status, we used a novel approach where two simple equations establish an individual cut-off of regurgitant volume/effective regurgitant orifice area, categorizing the study population into non-severe, proportionate and disproportionate FMR (Figure 1). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 572 patients (median age 70 years; 76% male) were included. Median LVEF was 35% (IQR 28-40) and LVEDV was 169 ml (IQR 132-215). Disproportionate FMR was present in 109 patients (19%) with a median EROA of 26 mm2 (IQR 22-31) and a median RegVol of 40 ml (IQR 34-48), proportionate FMR in 148 patients (26%) with a median EROA of 16mm2 (IQR 12-21) and a median RegVol of 26 ml (IQR 19-32). During a median follow-up of 3.8 years (interquartile range: 1.8 to 6.2 years) there were 254 deaths (44%). The unadjusted mortality incidence per 100 persons-year rose as the degree of FMR disproportionality worsened. On multivariable analysis, disproportionate FMR remained independently associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.785; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.249 to 2.550; P = 0.001). The FMR proportionality concept showed greater discriminative power (C-statistic 0.639; 95% CI: 0.597 to 0.680) than the American (C-statistic 0.588; 95% CI: 0.550 to 0.626; P for comparison = .001) and European guidelines (C-statistic 0.563; 95% CI: 0.534 to 0.591; P for comparison &lt; .001). It was also able to increase the net reclassification index (0.167 [P &lt; 0.001] and 0.084 [P = 0.001], respectively).

Conclusions

A new, simplified and individualized method of assessing FMR Proportionality showed that disproportionate FMR is independently associated with all-cause mortality. This approach seems to outperform the risk stratification of current guidelines.

Abstract Figure 1

Regurgitant volume to left ventricular end-diastolic volume ratio: another step to risk stratification in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation?

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

 Quantitative evaluation of secondary mitral valve regurgitation (MR) remains an important yet challenging step in the evaluation of this entity. Its severity can be underestimated when using the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method, which does not take left ventricular (LV) volume into account. Normalizing mitral regurgitant volume (Rvol) for the LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) might overcome this key limitation. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic implication of Rvol/EDV ratio in patients with secondary MR.

Methods

 Patients with at least mild secondary MR and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (&lt;50%) under optimal guidelines-directed medical therapy were retrospectively identified at a single-center. The cohort was divided into terciles according to the RVol/EDV ratio. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

Results

 A total of 572 patients (median age 70 years; 76% male) were included. Median LVEF was 35% (IQR 28-40) and LVEDV was 169 ml (IQR 132-215). Median measures of secondary MR were EROA 14 mm2 (IQR 8-22) and RegVol 23 ml (12-34). During a median follow-up of 3.8 years (interquartile range 1.8 to 6.2 years) there were 254 deaths (44%). The unadjusted mortality incidence increases across terciles distribution. Patients at the 2nd and 3rd terciles of the RVol/EDV ratio showed significantly higher mortality when compared to those at the 1st one (baseline reference) (figure 1). After multivariable analysis, terciles of the Rvol/EDV ratio remained independently associated with increased all-cause mortality (considering the 1st tercile as the reference; adjusted HR for the 2nd tercile 1.46 [95% CI 1.05- 2.02]  p = 0.023; adjusted HR for 3rd tercile 1.56 [95% CI 1.09 – 2.22], p = 0.015).

Conclusion

 In patients with secondary MR, Rvol/EDV ratio is independently associated with all-cause mortality. However, the appropriate cut-off to determine any kind of clinical decision remains to be determined.

Abstract Figure.

External validation of the unifying concept for the quantitative assessment of secondary mitral regurgitation

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

  A Unifying Concept for the Quantitative Assessment of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation (SMR) was recently proposed in order to provide a solution for the ongoing guideline controversy. However, these data were derived from a single center cohort and lacks external validation. We aimed to validate the proposed algorithm in a different patient population.

Methods

Patients with at least mild SMR and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (&lt; 50%) under optimal guideline-directed medical therapy were retrospectively identified at a single-center. The cohort was stratified in low-risk (effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA] &lt; 20 mm2 and regurgitant volume [RegVol] &lt; 30 ml), intermediate-risk (EROA 20 to 29 mm2 and RegVol 30 to 44 ml) and high-risk (EROA ≥ 30 mm2 and RegVol ≥ 45ml) according to the defined risk-based thresholds tailored to the pathophysiological concept of SMR. In the intermediate-risk group, patients were further stratified on the basis of the hemodynamic severity of SMR, into intermediate low-risk and intermediate high-risk (regurgitant fraction &lt; 50% or ≥ 50%, respectively). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 572 patients (median age 70 years; 76% male) were included. Median LVEF was 35% (IQR 28-40) and LVEDV was 169 ml (IQR 132-215). Median measures of SMR severity were EROA of 14 mm2 (IQR 8-22) and RegVol of 23 ml (12-34). During a median follow-up of 3.8 years (interquartile range: 1.8 to 6.2 years) there were 254 deaths (44%). The mortality at 6-years was 38.9% for the low-risk group, 30.7% for the intermediate low-risk, 64.9% in the intermediate high-risk and 63.2% in the high-risk group. On multivariable analysis, the defined thresholds of risk for SMR severity remained independently associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.164; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.020 to 1.327; P = 0.024). The unifying concept showed similar discriminative power (C-statistic 0.588; 95% CI: 0.540 to 0.635) to the American (C-statistic 0.588; 95% CI: 0.541 to 0.635; P for comparison = 1) and European guidelines (C-statistic 0.563; 95% CI: 0.515 to 0.610; P for comparison = 0.458), but it was able to increase the net reclassification index (0.143 [P &lt; .001] and 0.026 [P = .025], respectively).

Conclusions

In this cohort of patients with SMR and LVEF &lt;50%, the proposed unifying concept based on combined assessment of the EROA, the RegVol, and the RegFrac proved to be associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and could improve risk prediction of current guidelines.

Abstract Figure.

TROPHY registry - status report

INTRODUCTION

The TROPHY registry has been established to conduct an international multicenter prospective data collection on the surgical management of neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH)-related hydrocephalus to possibly contribute to future guidelines. The registry allows comparing the techniques established to treat hydrocephalus, such as external ventricular drainage (EVD), ventricular access device (VAD), ventricular subgaleal shunt (VSGS), and neuroendoscopic lavage (NEL). This first status report of the registry presents the results of the standard of care survey of participating centers assessed upon online registration.

METHODS

On the standard of treatment forms, each center indicated the institutional protocol of interventions performed for neonatal post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus (nPHH) for a time period of 2 years (Y1 and Y2) before starting the active participation in the registry. In addition, the amount of patients enrolled so far and allocated to a treatment approach are reported.

RESULTS

According to the standard of treatment forms completed by 56 registered centers, fewer EVDs (Y1 55% Y2 46%) were used while more centers have implemented NEL (Y1 39%; Y2 52%) to treat nPHH. VAD (Y1 66%; Y2 66%) and VSGS (Y1 42%; Y2 41%) were used at a consistent rate during the 2 years. The majority of the centers used at least two different techniques to treat nPHH (43%), while 27% used only one technique, 21% used three, and 7% used even four different techniques. Patient data of 110 infants treated surgically between 9/2018 and 2/2021 (13% EVD, 15% VAD, 30% VSGS, and 43% NEL) were contributed by 29 centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results emphasize the varying strategies used for the treatment of nPHH. The international TROPHY registry has entered into a phase of growing patient recruitment. Further evaluation will be performed and published according to the registry protocol.