Vefora, GETUG-AFU V06 study: Randomized multicenter phase II/III trial of fractionated cisplatin (CI)/gemcitabine (G) or carboplatin (CA)/g in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial cancer (UC) with impaired renal function (IRF)—Results of a planned interim analysis

461

Background: Standard treatment for advanced UC is chemotherapy (CT) combining CI and G. 70% of pts with UC are over 65 and 40% of them are unfit for CI because of IRF or comorbidities. CA replaces frequently CI, when creatinine clearance (Cr Cl) is < 60 ml/min according to Cockroft and Gault formula (CGF). However, CA tends to show a lower efficacy than CI, due to decreased dose intensity of CT. Methods: We performed a multicentre randomized phase II/III study in order to compare the activity and safety of a CT regimen with fractionated CI or CA for advanced UC in 1st line setting among pts unfit for standard CT because of IRF (40 ≤ Cr Cl ≤ 60ml/min) according to CGF. We report here the results of the interim analysis of phase II. Treatment: Arm A: CA AUC4,5 D1+ G 1000 mg/m² D1, [D1 = D21]; Arm B: fractionated CI 35 mg/m² D1D8 + G 1000 mg/m² D1D8, [D1 = D21] The co-primary objectives of the phase II were to evaluate activity (non-progression (RECIST V1.1) at (D21 C6)) and safety defined by the absence during treatment of: IRF: Cr Cl <35 mL/min or deterioration of Cr Cl >20%; delayed CT (≥ 2 weeks); decrease twice G dose on day 1 for: NCI CTC grade III or IV non-hematologic toxicity; hematologic toxicity; A two-stage Bryant and Day design was used. Results: A planned first step analysis was performed after randomization of 25 and 21 pts from April 2015 to January 2018. 23 and 19 of them were evaluable (resp. Arm A/B). 8 failures were reported for safety reason in experimental arm B, 7 for renal toxicity. Conclusions: According to our pre planned first step analysis, the trial met criteria for excessive toxicity in experimental arm (fractionated CI), predominantly renal toxicity. The study was therefore definitely stopped. Survival results will be available at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02240017 . [Table: see text]

Nivolumab in metastatic nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma: First results of the AcSe prospective study

699

Background: AcSe Nivolumab (N), is a non-randomised, open-label, multicentric study to investigate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab monotherapy in patients (pts) with specific rare cancers (NCT03012581). We report on the non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cohort. Methods: Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) at 12 weeks according to RECIST1.1. All pts receives N at 240mg IV every 2 weeks. Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), best response, and safety. Results: Between 07/2017 and 02/2019, 50 pts have been enrolled across 13 institutions. Median age was 61.4 years old, 70% were male. ECOG PS was 0, 1, 2, in 29%, 63% and 8% of pts respectively. Histological types were papillary (pRCC) type 2 (41%), chromophobe (18%), pRCC type I (10%), pRCC unclassified (8%), collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) (8%), and others (including predominant sarcomatoid, renal medullary carcinoma, MITF associated RCC, unclassified RCC). N was used in first line in 16%, second line in 54% and third line or beyond in 30%. IMDC risk group was 14%, 70% and 16% for good, intermediate and poor risk respectively. With a median follow up of 10.4 months (mo), 42 pts had discontinued N. The 12 weeks-ORR was 6% (3 PR), with stable disease in 49% and PD in 44% of pts. The best ORR was 10%. Median PFS was 3.9 mo (IC95% [2.9; 8.3]). At time of analysis, 25 pts (50%) had died and 12-months OS rate was 47.7% (IC95% [33.5; 67.8]). Overall, 31 pts (62%) have presented at least one grade ≥ 3 AE. No new safety signal with N was reported. 12 weeks-ORR and best ORR according to distinct histology are presented in table 1. Pts with PR were 1pRCC type 2, 1pRCC type 1, 1 CDC, 1 MITF RCC and 1 unclassified. Conclusions: We report the first prospective study of N single agent in non-clear cell RCC. N demonstrates limited activity in a pretreated and heterogeneous non- clear cell RCC population. Interestingly 1/4 CDC developed PR while no response was noted in chromophobe RCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03012581. [Table: see text]

Benefit of prophylactic anticoagulation before and during first-line chemotherapy on patients with metastatic germ cell tumors

402

Background: Recent trials randomising patients (pts) receiving systemic cancer therapy showed that prophylactic anticoagulation (PAK) halves the risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) and doubles the risk of bleeding (Khorana et al. & Carrier et al., both NEJM 2019). In pts with metastatic germ cell tumors (mGCT) VTE is a frequent complication but it remains unclear whether PAK should be recommended because the number of mGCT pts in those trials was small. We aimed to determine the risk of VTE before, during and after chemotherapy and in mGCT pts without and with risk factors for VTE (retroperitoneal lymph nodes, Khorana score, venous access device) and to calculate the number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) of PAK. Methods: This retrospective analysis included mGCT pts treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. We excluded patients who received PAK, with a known history of coagulopathy or VTE and extracted data about VTE and bleeding events. Cumulative VTE incidence was calculate for patients without and with increasing number of known risk factors for VTEs. NNT and NNH were calculated by assuming similar hazard ratios (HR) to reduce VTEs and increase bleeding as previously published (HR 0.66 and 1.96, Khorana et al., NEJM 2019). Results: Out of 1039 pts, 132 (13%) presented with VTE, 6 (1%) with bleeding. One patients died of VTE and 1 because of bleeding. Patients without any VTE risk factors experience VTE in 20/347 (5%) which translated into a NNT of 55 compared to the NNH of 84 respectively. Before start of chemotherapy 52 (5%) pts (NNT=60) presented with VTE of which 22 were reported symptomatic 21 asymptomatic/incidentally detected VTE on staging scans (9 unknowns). During chemotherapy 79 (8%) pts (NNT=40) were diagnosed with VTE whereas 19 (2%) pts (NNT=162) were diagnosed with VTE after chemotherapy. Conclusions: Our analysis revealed that even mGCT patients without risk factors for VTE show a relevant cumulative VTE incidence of 7%. Especially before and during but not after chemotherapy the benefits of PAK to prevent VTE outweighs the small increased risk of bleeding.

[Docetaxel for octogerian metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patient: A multicentric ten years' experience]

INTRODUCTION

There is very few data about the management of elderly patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of this study was to analyze the management of patients aged 80 and over treated with docetaxel for a mCRPC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Clinical and pathological characteristics of octogerians treated with docetaxel were collected retrospectively from 3 French centers from 2009 to 2019. Patient's outcome, treatments administered before and/or after docetaxel were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Data of 89 patients could be analyzed. A total of 20.2 % of patients received the standard regimen and 79.8 % received an adapted one. Patients in the adapted group were significantly older than in standard one. Other patient's characteristics - including the geriatric scales - were similar. Dose reductions for toxicity were more frequent in the standard group (P=0.04). The median overall survival of the total population was 13.3 months. It was longer in the standard group than in the adapted group (26.1 months vs 12.4 months=0.01). In multivariate analysis, the type of docetaxel regimen (standard versus adapted) was an independent predictor of survival.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests the benefit of the standard management even in oldest patients. A geriatric evaluation should certainly be processed in patients with poor oncogeriatric scale in order to select the sub-population able to receive the full dose standard docetaxel regimen.

Final results from the randomized CABADOC trial: Patient preference between cabazitaxel and docetaxel for first-line chemotherapy in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

5017

Background: Docetaxel and cabazitaxel represent now the standard of care in men with mCRPC with similar efficacy reported in metastatic first-line setting in the FIRSTANA phase 3 trial. We assessed patients’ preference between the two taxanes. Methods: Patients with taxane-naïve mCRPC were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either docetaxel 75mg/m2/q3w x 4 followed by cabazitaxel 25mg/m2/q3w x 4 (DO-CA), or the reverse sequence (CA-DO). Randomization was stratified based on prior next generation AR axis inhibitors use. The primary endpoint was patient preference between taxanes, as assessed by questionnaires in patients who had received at least one cycle of each taxane and who had not experienced a progression while on the first taxane. Results: From June 2014 to October 2016, 195 men were randomized in 17 centers. After adjusting for the treatment period effect, more patients preferred cabazitaxel (43%) vs docetaxel (27%) (p < 0.004); 30% had no preference between taxanes. Fatigue, patient-defined quality of life, hair loss, and pain were the most common factors influencing patient preference. Febrile neutropenia was experienced by 5 (7.1%) men treated with cabazitaxel during the first period who received G-CSF and by 2 (7.1%) of those who did not. No febrile neutropenia was reported with docetaxel in both arms and with cabazitaxel during the 2nd period, irrespectively of the use of G-CSF. The incidence of diarrhea during the first 3-month period was slightly reduced with G-CSF use in men receiving cabazitaxel (32.1% vs 24.3%) but not in those receiving docetaxel (23.8% vs 25%). The median progression-free survival was 9.81 in the DO-CA arm and 9.33 months in the CA-DO arm. The median overall survival was also similar in the two groups (22.64 in the DO-CA arm and 20.73 months in the CA-DO arm. Conclusions: Although cabazitaxel and docetaxel have similar efficacy when used as first-line in mCRPC men, more patients prefer cabazitaxel. Clinical trial information: NCT02044354.

Impact of cannabis (CA) use on chemotherapy (C) treatment and tumor characteristics of patients (pts) with testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT): Experience of the Centre Léon Bérard (CLB)

e16054

Background: TGCT are the most frequent cancers in men aged 15-45. This population is increasingly exposed to CA that is illegal in France. Its consequences on treatment and prognosis remain unknown. Methods: The use and the quantity of CA were evaluated for all pts treated by C for a TGCT in the CLB from 01/2016 to 06/2018. Tobacco (T) and alcohol (A) co-addictions were also analyzed. All pts had before starting C pulmonary test with diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxyde (DLCO) evaluation. We searched a link between the use of toxics, contraindication to Bleomycin (B) due to decreased DLCO and tumor characteristics: stage and IGCCCG prognostic groups. Results: One hundred and thirty two pts with a median age of 33.5 years (interval: 17-65) received C for TGCT mainly for NSGCT (n = 97, 73%). Nine pts (7%) were treated in the adjuvant setting (1: 6 or 2 BEP: 3). In metastatic pts, 79 (60%), 30 (23%) and 14 (10%) were considered as good, intermediate and poor prognosis (PG) according to IGCCCG respectively. BEP was given for 3 cycles to 63 pts and 4 to29 and 6 pts received a dose dense regimen according to GETUG13. Eleven pts didn’t received B (5: 4EP, 6: 4VIP) because of DLCO alteration before the beginning of C. Eleven pts treated with B switched to a regimen without B due to a decrease of the DLCO during treatment. CA use was frequent (n = 20, 15%) with 8 pts (6%) having a regular CA consumption (median 5 joints/d). Seventy eight pts (59%) were regular T smokers. Co-addictions for CA consumers were frequent (90% for T and 50% for A). T and CA smokers had more DLCO alteration leading to B contraindication (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04). A quarter (n = 5) of pts using CA didn’t received B, and only 1 pt who didn’t receive B was not a smoker (T and CA). The use of CA was associated with PG, OR 5.46 (CI 95%: 1.35-21.2; p = 008). We could not observe a relationship between relapse and the use of CA (p = 0.34) because of the small number of relapses (n = 8). Half (n = 10) of CA consumers were single men and 25% (n = 5) were unemployed. Conclusions: The use of CA is significantly associated with PG and with a reduction of B use due to adecreased DLCO. The impact of CA intoxication is negative on the quality of treatment (because of more contraindications to B). The association with PG remains unclear, but may be related to social isolation.

Initial results from a phase II study of nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC; CheckMate 650)

142

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy has shown limited clinical benefit in patients (pts) with prostate cancer, likely due to an immunologically “cold” tumor microenvironment. We report preplanned interim efficacy/safety for NIVO + IPI in pts with mCRPC from CheckMate 650. Methods: Asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic pts who progressed after 2nd-generation hormone therapy and have not received chemotherapy for mCRPC (cohort 1) and pts who progressed after taxane-based chemotherapy (cohort 2) were included. Treatment was NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses, then NIVO 480 mg every 4 weeks. Coprimary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR) and radiographic PFS per PCWG2. Safety is a secondary endpoint. Exploratory endpoints include correlation of biomarkers with efficacy. Results: 78 pts had a minimum follow-up of 6 months; among pts with baseline measurable disease, ORR was 26% and 10% in cohorts 1 and 2 (Table). In both cohorts, ORR was higher in pts with PD-L1 ≥1%, DNA damage repair (DDR), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), or above-median tumor mutational burden (TMB). Of all PSA responding pts (Table), 4 had PSA <0.2 ng/mL. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 39% and 51% of pts in cohorts 1 and 2; one grade 5 event occurred in each cohort. Conclusions: In a malignancy where immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy has previously shown limited success, NIVO + IPI demonstrated activity in pretreated pts with mCRPC, particularly in a biomarker-enriched population, with a safety profile consistent with this dosing schedule. Further study is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02985957. [Table: see text]

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with olaparib in combination with abiraterone

234

Background: A Phase II trial showed that addition of olaparib (O) to abiraterone (A) led to significant radiographic progression-free survival benefit for patients (pts) with mCRPC vs placebo (P) + A (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44–0.97). We report predefined exploratory HRQoL analyses. Methods: This randomized, double-blind trial enrolled pts with mCRPC, post-docetaxel. Pts were randomized (71 per arm) to receive either O (300 mg bd, tablets) + A (1000 mg od) or P + A; all received prednisone (5 mg bd). Pts completed Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P total score [TS]; range 0–156, higher score = better HRQoL), Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form (BPI-SF) and worst bone pain (wbp) questionnaires (both range 0–10, higher score = more severe pain). Adjusted mean change from baseline was analysed using a mixed model for repeated measures, improvement by logistic regression and deterioration by log-rank test. Results: Overall compliance rates (O + A vs P + A) were 97% vs 96%, 92% vs 85%, and 96% vs 92% for FACT-P, BPI-SF and wbp, respectively. Best FACT-P TS response of ‘improved’ (increase ≥6 points from baseline at two consecutive visits) was reported by 22/67 (33%) evaluable pts in the O + A vs 18/64 (28%) pts in the P + A arm; the odds ratio (1.32; 95% CI 0.64–2.78) favored the O + A arm. Best FACT-P TS response of ‘worsened’ (decrease ≥6 points from baseline) was reported by 15 (22%) vs 22 (34%) pts. Adjusted mean change from baseline in FACT-P TS across all visits was -0.60 vs -2.09 in the O + A and P + A arms, respectively (difference 1.48; 95% CI -3.96–6.92). Time to deterioration (TTD) results are shown in the table. Clinical trial information: NCT01972217. Conclusions: Whilst not statistically significant, in this study a higher percentage of pts treated with O + A vs P + A had improved HRQoL, with fewer pts negatively affected. Ongoing phase III studies will help elucidate the impact of O on HRQoL in pts with mCRPC. (NCT01972217)[Table: see text]

Ramucirumab (RAM) exposure-response (ER) relationship in RANGE: A randomized phase III trial of RAM plus docetaxel (DOC) versus placebo (P) plus DOC in advanced platinum-refractory urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients (pts)

353

Background: Recent RANGE results showed significant improvement in PFS, a non-significant positive trend in OS, increased ORR and acceptable safety with RAM+DOC vs P+DOC in UC pts (Petrylak et al. Lancet 2017; Petrylak et al. ESMO 2018, abstr 865PD). RAM ER-OS relationships in RANGE are reported here. Methods: Pts received RAM (10 mg/kg) + DOC or P + DOC (Day 1 of a 21 day cycle) until discontinuation criteria were met. Population pharmacokinetic analysis predicted RAM minimum concentrations after first dose (RAM Cmin, 1). Multivariate Cox regression & matched case control (MCC) analyses using exposure treated as a continuous covariate, or grouped as quartiles, evaluated the ER-OS relationship. Results: Several poor prognostic factors, including Bellmunt risk factors, appeared to be more frequent in the lower exposure quartiles, suggesting a possible disease-PK interaction. Increasing RAM exposure as a continuous covariate in an ER population of n=246 pts significantly ( p=0.01) associated with improvements in OS. Higher exposure quartiles trended toward longer survival & smaller HRs compared to P (Table, Q1=lowest). Conclusions: OS and ORR benefits favored Q4, a group which was associated with more favorable prognostic features and higher exposure. The observed disease-PK interaction may confound the interpretation of the ER results and warrants further exploration. Clinical trial information: NCT02426125. [Table: see text]

Clinical progression at initiation of a life-extending therapy (LET) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is associated with a poor prognosis, whatever the treatment-line: Results of the CATS retrospective registry

189

Background: We previously reported that cancer pain was associated with a poor prognosis in mCRPC patients (pts) treated with docetaxel (D) ( Oudard, BJU Int 2009). Asymptomatic chemo-naive pts treated with novel androgen receptor targeted agent (H) have a greater overall survival (OS) than those with mild symptoms ( Miller, Eur Urol 2018). We thus investigated the impact on OS of progression type at initiation of first-, second- and third-line of LET in a large cohort of mCRPC pts (CATS registry) treated with D, cabazitaxel (C) and H. Methods: 669 consecutive mCRPC pts treated with 3 LETs (DCH, n= 158; DHC, n=456; HDC, n=55) were retrospectively reviewed. Type of progression: PSA alone, radiographic ± PSA, clinical ± PSA ± radiographic at initiation of each LET was evaluable in 661 pts. Clinical progression was defined by worsening of cancer-related pain or symptoms as per physician judgment. Results: Clinical progression at initiation of LET increased with the number of treatment lines and was consistently associated with a worse outcome. Clinical progression was associated with a significantly shorter duration of treatment with H but had no influence on duration of taxanes. Conclusions: In pts treated with 3 LTEs (D, C and H) clinical progression at sequence initiation is associated with a poor OS and a shorter duration of hormonal treatment. These data may help guide treatment decisions.[Table: see text]

[Non-palpable testicular tumors in adults: A management based on imaging? Issue from the French Urologic Association Genital Cancer committee's edit]

BACKGROUND

Help in management of non-palpable testicular tumors. French Urologic Association Genital cancer committee's Edit.

OBJECTIVES

To review their characterization at imaging findings of non-palpable testicular tumors.

DOCUMENTARY SOURCES

Literature review (PubMed, Medline) of urological and radiological studies dealing with testicular tumors using keywords: non-palpable/incidental testicular tumors; color Doppler ultrasound; US elastography; magnetic resonance imaging; contrast enhanced sonography; partial surgery.

RESULTS

Color Doppler is the basic exam. The size, the presence of microlithts/microlithiasis/macrocalcifications, the vascular architecture are major semiological findings to suggest the benign or the malignant nature of the lesion. Other techniques like multiparametric MRI, contrast-enhanced sonography, sonographic elastography are still in evaluation. The frequency of benign tumors such as Leydig cell tumors lead to preservation management, through improved characterization, monitoring or tumorectomy.

LIMITS

Non-randomized study - a very few prospective studies.

CONCLUSION

The era of total orchiectomy for any uncertain testicular lesion is over. We try the challenge of characterization, and define management's algorithms based on the suspected nature of the tumors.

Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) versus dose dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (DD-MVAC) in the perioperative setting for patients with locally advanced transitional cell cancer of the bladder: The French GETUG/AFU V05 VESPER trial

TPS530

Background: Radical cystectomy remains the gold standard treatment for invasive non metastatic transitional cell cancer of the bladder. Perioperative chemotherapy (adjuvant ou neoadjuvant) has been developed to increase overall survival. However, the chemotherapy administration time and optimal chemotherapy regimen are not yet determined. As DD-MVAC has been shown to be associated with higher response rates in bladder metastatic disease, also a better efficacy can be suspected in the perioperative setting. Methods: We designed a randomized phase III study to compare the efficacy of GC and DD-MVAC in term of progression-free survival in patients for whom chemotherapy has been decided, before or after radical cystectomy (disease defined by a T2, T3 or T4a N0 M0 stadification for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or pT3 or pT4 or pN+ and M0 for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy). Secondary endpoints include overall survival, side effects, response rate in the neoadjuvant setting. Main exclusion criteria were histological variants (pure adenocarcinoma or pure epidermoid carcinoma or pure or mixed small-cell neuro-endocrine carcinoma) and ventricular ejection fraction under 50%. The total number of patients projected was 500 based on the median progression-free survival rate of 50% at 3 years observed in patients treated with GC (standard arm A) in the perioperative setting. An absolute improvement of 10% (HR = 0.74) was expected with DD-MVAC (experimental arm B) with a = 0.05 and b = 0.20. In October 2017, 460 patients have been included. An interim analysis is planned after the occurrence of 174 events. With an estimated uniform accrual rate of 140 patients per year for 3.5 years and exponential survival, the final analysis is expected to occur 8 years after the start of the trial. Concomitant ancillary study has also started, focusing on the identification of subgroups for muscle invasive bladder tumors sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as suggested by the recent MDA classification. Clinical trial information: NCT 018 12369.

Outcomes of male patients with germ cell tumors and bone metastases: A mono-institutional retrospective study

570

Background: Bone metastases (BM) are considered as intermediate or poor prognosis according to the international classification of Germ Cell Tumors (GCT). The present study compares the outcomes between patients with bone disease at initial diagnosis and bone disease at relapse and between seminoma and non-seminoma GCT. Methods: We investigated retrospectively all male-patients presenting GCT with BM at initial diagnosis or at relapse, between 2005 and 2015, in a single institution. Results: Thirty-nine patients were included. Median age was 36 (from 20 to 67). Nineteen patients presented with BM at initial diagnosis (49%) and 20 patients presented BM at relapse (51%). Histologically, 13 patients (33%) presented a seminoma and 26 patients (67%) a non-seminoma GCT. Twenty-four patients (62%) had multiples bone metastatic sites. Vertebra was the most frequent location (70%). Bone surgery was performed for five patients with seminoma (38%) and four patients with non-seminoma GCT (15%). Median overall survival (OS) was 130.9 months for the 19 patients with BM at initial diagnosis and 15.2 months for the 20 patient with BM at relapse HR 5.3 95%CI[1.75;16.06], p < 0.001. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 120.10 months for patients with BM at initial diagnosis and 9.21 months for patients with BM at relapse, HR 3.02 95%CI[1.16;7.83], p < 0.0016. Survivals are longer for patients with seminoma than patients with non-seminoma GCT. Median PFS was 9.41 months for the 13 patient with non-seminoma GCT and not achieved for the 26 patients with seminoma, HR 0.15, 95%CI [0.003;0.65], p 0.001 . Median OS was 18.7 months for the 13 patient with non-seminoma GCT and not achieved for the 26 patients with seminoma, HR 0.16 95% CI [0.004;0.7], p 0.002. Conclusions: BM of GCT are associated with a worse prognosis especially for non-seminoma subtype and/or when BM arise at relapse. This data highlights the importance of the first line therapeutic strategy as the corner stone of treatment for patients with GCT.

Docetaxel with or without ramucirumab after immune checkpoint inhibition in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Prespecified subgroup analysis from the phase 3 RANGE trial

434

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have shown objective response rates (ORR) of 15-21% in PD-L1 unselected patients (pts) with platinum-refractory mUC. Overall results of RANGE, a randomized, double-blinded phase 3 trial comparing ramucirumab and docetaxel (R+D) to placebo and docetaxel (P+D) in pts with platinum-refractory mUC demonstrated an ORR of 24.5% to R+D and a statistically significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS; median 4.07 vs 2.76 mo; HR 0.757). Here we present a pre-specified subgroup analysis of pts who received a prior ICI. Methods: RANGE enrolled pts with progressive mUC during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Additional prior treatment with one ICI was permitted. Pts were randomized (1:1) to receive D 75 mg/m2 up to 10 cycles with R 10 mg/kg or P on day 1 of a 21-day cycle until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria. Primary endpoint, investigator-assessed PFS, was analyzed in the first 437 randomized pts. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response, and safety. Radiographic assessment occurred every 6 weeks. Results: Thirty three of the 437 pts (8%) in the PFS population received a prior ICI. The majority (91%) received the ICI immediately following platinum and immediately prior to RANGE. Most pts received atezolizumab (55%) or pembrolizumab (36%); ORR to prior ICI was 6% and the majority (67%) had progressive disease as best response. Median duration of the ICI was 3.5 mo (IQR 1.6-5.2). Disease sites at entry onto RANGE included lymph node (79%), lung (48%), liver (39%) and bone (18%). At data cutoff, responses were achieved by 5/14 (35.7%) on R+D, compared to 2/19 (10.5%) on P+D. Responses to R+D were independent of disease site. Of pts with liver metastases, 3/8 responded to R+D compared to 0/5 on P+D. Overall, median PFS was 5.29 mo on R+D and 2.76 mo on P+D (HR 0.920). The frequency of grade ≥3 adverse events was similar between arms. Conclusions: Acknowledging limitations of sample size, R+D showed higher ORR than P+D in pts who had progressed on platinum and ICI therapy, including those with liver metastases. Clinical trial information: NCT02426125.