Cancer incidence and mortality in the Czech Republic

BACKGROUND

The Czech Republic ranks among the countries with the highest cancer burden in Europe as well as worldwide. The purpose of this study is to summarize longterm trends in the cancer burden and to provide up-to-date estimates of incidence and mortality rates after 2011.

DATA AND METHODS

The Czech National Cancer Registry (CNCR) was instituted in 1977 and contains information collected over a 34-year period of standardized registration covering 100% of cancer diagnoses within the entire Czech population. The CNCR analysis is supported by demographic data and by the Death Records Database. An overview of the epidemiology of malignant tumors in the Czech population is available online at www.svod.cz.

RESULTS

All neoplasms, including nonmelanoma skin cancer, reached a crude incidence rate of almost 802 cases per 100,000 men and 681 cases per 100,000 women in 2011. The annual mortality rate exceeded 258 deaths per 100,000 individuals; in other words, more than 27,000 individuals die of cancer each year. The overall incidence of malignancies has increased with a growth index of +27.6% during the last decade (2001- 2011), while the mortality rate has been stabilized over the time span (growth index in 2001- 2011: - 5.0%). Consequently, the prevalence has significantly increased in the observed period and exceeded 475,000 cases in 2011. In addition to demographic aging of the Czech population, the cancer burden has also increased due to the growing incidence of multiple primary tumors (recently more than 15% of the total incidence). The most frequent diagnoses include colorectal cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. Although some neoplasms are increasingly diagnosed at an early stage (e. g. the proportion of stage I or II was 75.3% for female breast cancer and 84.2% for skin melanoma), the numbers of early diagnosed cases are generally insufficient, even in the case of highly prevalent cancers such as colorectal carcinoma (only 46.1% of incident cases are diagnosed at stage I or II, according to recent data).

CONCLUSION

Population-based data on malignant tumors are available in the Czech Republic. The data survey can help us define national cancer management priorities. The current priority is to achieve a sustained reduction of cases diagnosed at an advanced stage and reduction of the significant regional differences in diagnostic efficiency.

A randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial of masitinib plus gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Masitinib is a selective oral tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. The efficacy and safety of masitinib combined with gemcitabine was compared against single-agent gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with inoperable, chemotherapy-naïve, PDAC were randomized (1 : 1) to receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) in combination with either masitinib (9 mg/kg/day) or a placebo. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the modified intent-to-treat population. Secondary OS analyses aimed to characterize subgroups with poor survival while receiving single-agent gemcitabine with subsequent evaluation of masitinib therapeutic benefit. These prospectively declared subgroups were based on pharmacogenomic data or a baseline characteristic.

RESULTS

Three hundred and fifty-three patients were randomly assigned to receive either masitinib plus gemcitabine (N = 175) or placebo plus gemcitabine (N = 178). Median OS was similar between treatment-arms for the overall population, at respectively, 7.7 and 7.1 months, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.89 (95% CI [0.70; 1.13]. Secondary analyses identified two subgroups having a significantly poor survival rate when receiving single-agent gemcitabine; one defined by an overexpression of acyl-CoA oxidase-1 (ACOX1) in blood, and another via a baseline pain intensity threshold (VAS > 20 mm). These subgroups represent a critical unmet medical need as evidenced from median OS of 5.5 months in patients receiving single-agent gemcitabine, and comprise an estimated 63% of patients. A significant treatment effect was observed in these subgroups for masitinib with median OS of 11.7 months in the 'ACOX1' subgroup [HR = 0.23 (0.10; 0.51), P = 0.001], and 8.0 months in the 'pain' subgroup [HR = 0.62 (0.43; 0.89), P = 0.012]. Despite an increased toxicity of the combination as compared with single-agent gemcitabine, side-effects remained manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data warrant initiation of a confirmatory study that may support the use of masitinib plus gemcitabine for treatment of PDAC patients with overexpression of ACOX1 or baseline pain (VAS > 20mm). Masitinib's effect in these subgroups is also supported by biological plausibility and evidence of internal clinical validation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00789633.

Axitinib dose titration: analyses of exposure, blood pressure and clinical response from a randomized phase II study in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In a randomized, double-blind phase II trial in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), axitinib versus placebo titration yielded a significantly higher objective response rate. We evaluated pharmacokinetic and blood pressure (BP) data from this study to elucidate relationships among axitinib exposure, BP change, and efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received axitinib 5 mg twice daily during a lead-in period. Patients who met dose-titration criteria were randomized 1:1 to stepwise dose increases with axitinib or placebo. Patients ineligible for randomization continued without dose increases. Serial 6-h and sparse pharmacokinetic sampling were carried out; BP was measured at clinic visits and at home in all patients, and by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in a subset of patients.

RESULTS

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h throughout the course of treatment (AUCstudy) was higher in patients with complete or partial responses than those with stable or progressive disease in the axitinib-titration arm, but comparable between these groups in the placebo-titration and nonrandomized arms. In the overall population, AUCstudy and efficacy outcomes were not strongly correlated. Mean BP across the population was similar when measured in clinic, at home, or by 24-h ABPM. Weak correlations were observed between axitinib steady-state exposure and diastolic BP. When grouped by change in diastolic BP from baseline, patients in the ≥10 and ≥15 mmHg groups had longer progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal axitinib exposure may differ among patients with mRCC. Pharmacokinetic or BP measurements cannot be used exclusively to guide axitinib dosing. Individualization of treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including axitinib, is thus more complex than anticipated and cannot be limited to a single clinical factor.

A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ganitumab or placebo in combination with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: the GAMMA trial

BACKGROUND

This double-blind, phase 3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of ganitumab combined with gemcitabine as first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned 2 : 2 : 1 to receive intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) plus placebo, ganitumab 12 mg/kg, or ganitumab 20 mg/kg (days 1 and 15 of each cycle). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and efficacy by levels of circulating biomarkers.

RESULTS

Overall, 322 patients were randomly assigned to placebo, 318 to ganitumab 12 mg/kg, and 160 to ganitumab 20 mg/kg. The study was stopped based on results from a preplanned futility analysis; the final results are reported. Median OS was 7.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.3-8.2] in the placebo arm, 7.0 months (95% CI, 6.2-8.5) in the ganitumab 12-mg/kg arm [hazard ratio (HR), 1.00; 95% CI, 0.82-1.21; P = 0.494], and 7.1 months (95% CI, 6.4-8.5) in the ganitumab 20-mg/kg arm (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.76-1.23; P = 0.397). Median PFS was 3.7, 3.6 (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84-1.20; P = 0.520), and 3.7 months (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.77-1.22; P = 0.403), respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed with ganitumab plus gemcitabine. The circulating biomarkers assessed [insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), IGF-binding protein-2, and -3] were not associated with a treatment effect on OS or PFS by ganitumab.

CONCLUSION

Ganitumab combined with gemcitabine had manageable toxicity but did not improve OS, compared with gemcitabine alone in unselected patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01231347.

Abituzumab combined with cetuximab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomised phase I/II POSEIDON trial

BACKGROUND

Integrins are involved in tumour progression and metastasis, and differentially expressed on colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. Abituzumab (EMD 525797), a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting integrin αν heterodimers, has demonstrated preclinical activity. This trial was designed to assess the tolerability of different doses of abituzumab in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan (phase I) and explore the efficacy and tolerability of the combination versus that of cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) (phase II part).

METHODS

Eligible patients had KRAS (exon 2) wild-type mCRC and had received prior oxaliplatin-containing therapy. The trial comprised an initial safety run-in using abituzumab doses up to 1000 mg combined with a standard of care (SoC: cetuximab plus irinotecan) and a phase II part in which patients were randomised 1 : 1 : 1 to receive abituzumab 500 mg (arm A) or 1000 mg (arm B) every 2 weeks combined with SoC, or SoC alone (arm C). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and tolerability. Associations between tumour integrin expression and outcomes were also assessed.

RESULTS

Phase I showed that abituzumab doses up to 1000 mg were well tolerated in combination with SoC. Seventy-three (arm A), 71 (arm B) and 72 (arm C) patients were randomised to the phase II part. Baseline characteristics were balanced. PFS was similar in the three arms: arm A versus SoC, hazard ratio (HR) 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.64]; arm B versus SoC, HR 1.11 (95% CI 0.77-1.61). RRs were also similar. A trend toward improved OS was observed: arm A versus SoC, HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.54-1.28); arm B versus SoC, HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.52-1.25). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 72%, 78% and 67% of patients. High tumour integrin αvβ6 expression was associated with longer OS in arms A [HR 0.55 (0.30-1.00)] and B [HR 0.41 (0.21-0.81)] than in arm C.

CONCLUSION

The primary PFS end point was not met, although predefined exploratory biomarker analyses identified subgroups of patients in whom abituzumab may have benefit. The tolerability of abituzumab combined with cetuximab and irinotecan was acceptable. Further study is warranted. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01008475.

Selecting first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for advanced breast cancer: TURANDOT risk factor analyses

BACKGROUND

The randomised phase III TURANDOT trial compared first-line bevacizumab-paclitaxel (BEV-PAC) vs bevacizumab-capecitabine (BEV-CAP) in HER2-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC). The interim analysis revealed no difference in overall survival (OS; primary end point) between treatment arms; however, progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate were significantly superior with BEV-PAC. We sought to identify patient populations that may be most appropriately treated with one or other regimen.

METHODS

Patients with HER2-negative LR/mBC who had received no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease were randomised to either BEV-PAC (bevacizumab 10 mg kg(-1) days 1 and 15 plus paclitaxel 90 mg m(-2) days 1, 8 and 15 q4w) or BEV-CAP (bevacizumab 15 mg kg(-1) day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) bid days 1-14 q3w). The study population was categorised into three cohorts: triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), high-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and low-risk HR+. High- and low-risk HR+ were defined, respectively, as having ⩾2 vs ⩽1 of the following four risk factors: disease-free interval ⩽24 months; visceral metastases; prior (neo)adjuvant anthracycline and/or taxane; and metastases in ⩾3 organs.

RESULTS

The treatment effect on OS differed between cohorts. Non-significant OS trends favoured BEV-PAC in the TNBC cohort and BEV-CAP in the low-risk HR+ cohort. In all three cohorts, there was a non-significant PFS trend favouring BEV-PAC. Grade ⩾3 adverse events were consistently less common with BEV-CAP.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple risk factor index may help in selecting bevacizumab-containing regimens, balancing outcome, safety profile and patient preference. Final OS results are expected in 2015 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00600340).

Subcutaneous versus intravenous formulation of trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer: updated results from the phase III HannaH study

BACKGROUND

HannaH (NCT00950300) was a phase III, randomized, international, open-label study that compared pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of two different trastuzumab formulations [subcutaneous (s.c.) and intravenous (i.v.)] in HER2-positive, operable, locally advanced, or inflammatory breast cancer in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting. The co-primary end points, to show noninferiority of s.c. versus i.v. trastuzumab in terms of serum concentration (Ctrough) and pathologic complete response (pCR) were met; safety profiles were comparable at 12 months' median follow-up. Secondary end points included safety and tolerability, PK profile, immunogenicity, and event-free survival (EFS). We now report updated safety and efficacy data after a median follow-up of 20 months.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (N = 596) were treated with eight cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, administered concurrently with 3-weekly s.c. trastuzumab (fixed dose of 600 mg) or the standard weight-based i.v. method. Following surgery, patients continued trastuzumab treatment to complete 1 year of therapy. Updated analyses of PK, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity data were carried out.

RESULTS

s.c. trastuzumab was generally well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events (AEs), including grade 3 or 4 AEs, between treatment groups was comparable. A slightly higher incidence of serious AEs (SAEs), mainly due to infections, was reported with s.c. treatment {64 [21.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 17.0%-26.7%] versus 42 (14.1%; 95% CI 10.4%-18.6%) in the i.v. group}; however, the differences were small and often based on rare events, with no observable pattern across reported events. An early analysis of EFS showed rates of 95% in both groups 1 year postrandomization. Exploratory analyses did not reveal an association between toxicity and body weight or exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the safety profile of s.c. trastuzumab was consistent with the previously published data from HannaH and the known safety profile of i.v. trastuzumab. EFS rates were comparable between the i.v. and s.c. groups.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT00950300.

[Influence of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on changes of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in patients treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy for local advanced rectal carcinoma]

AIM

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the prognostic impact of expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) changes during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred and three patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma of stage II and III were evaluated. All patients were administered the total dose of 44 --  50.4 Gy. Concomitantly, the patients received capecitabine in the dose 825 mg/ m² in two daily oral administrations or 5- fluorouracil in the dose 200 mg/ m² in continuous infusion. Surgery was indicated at intervals of 4-8 weeks from chemoradiotherapy completion. EGFR expression in the pretreatment biopsies and in resected specimens was assessed with immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

All of 103 patients received radiotherapy without interruption up to the total planned dose. Downstaging was described in 64 patients. Six patients had complete pathologic remission. Recurrence occurred in 49 patients. Local recurrence was found in 22 patients, generalization of disease was reported in 27 patients. A total of 51 patients died. Increased EGFR expression was found in 26 patients. The statistically significantly shorter overall survival (p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (p < 0.001) was found in patients with increased expression of EGFR compared with patients where no increase in the expression of EGFR was observed during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The overexpression of EGFR during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma is associated with significant shorter overall survival and disease-free survival.

Primary cilia in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

The primary cilium is a solitary, sensory, non-motile microtubule-based structure that arises from the centrosome and is projected from the surface of most human cells. The objective of the current pilot study was to conduct an investigation of presence and frequency of cilia in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).The presence of primary cilia in GIST was evaluated in 9 patients, including 8 primary tumors and 1 liver metastasis. In 2 patients the presence of primary cilia was evaluated not only in the primary tumor, but also in recurrence: in 1 patient in recurrence without previous treatment with imatinib and in 1 patient in recurrence after treatment with imatinib. The primary cilia of GIST cells were immunofluorescently stained with primary monoclonal anti-acetylated tubulin alpha antibody and cell nuclei with DAPI.We observed 9985 nuclei of cells of GISTs and 425 primary cilia in total. The median of frequency of primary cilia in cells of GISTs in all examined samples was 4.26%, in primary tumors was 4.32% and in metastases was 3.64%, respectively. This pilot study provides the evidence of the presence of primary cilia in GISTs in different organs. Primary cilia were identified in all examined cases of GIST, including primary tumors, metastases and recurrent lesions without and with previous treatment with imatinib.

Abstract PD5-5: Phase 2 study of single agent MLN8237 (alisertib), an investigational aurora A kinase (AAK) inhibitor, in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory breast cancer (BrC)

Background: AAK, a key mitotic regulator, is frequently amplified/overexpressed across a spectrum of tumors, including BrC. AAK overexpression is associated with poor prognosis. MLN8237 is an oral selective AAK inhibitor under evaluation in pts with advanced cancer as a single agent and in combination therapy. A phase 1/2 study (NCT01045421) evaluated MLN8237 in pts with different solid tumors; phase 2 data for the Brc cohort are presented.

Methods: Females aged ≥18 y with relapsed/refractory BrC including HR+, HER2+ and triple-negative histological subtype, ECOG PS 0–1, measurable disease by RECIST v1.1 and ≤4 prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens (not including adjuvant, neo-adjuvant; no limitation on prior hormonal or HER2 targeted, immunological or biological agents) were enrolled. Symptomatic brain metastases were excluded (treated stable metastasis allowed). A Simon's optimal 2-stage design was used; 20 pts were initially enrolled, expansion proceeded if ≥2 objective responses were observed in these response-evaluable pts. Pts received MLN8237 50 mg BID for 7 days in 21-day cycles. Primary objective: overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives: safety, duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS). An exploratory study was performed to assess clinical responses in relation to candidate biomarker dysregulation (mutation, amplification, and deletion) in banked tumor specimens.

Results: As of April, 2013, 53 pts were enrolled: median age was 60 y (range 33–81), median of 4 cycles (range 1–21). 49 pts (92%) were response-evaluable (HR+, n = 26; HER2+, n = 9; triple negative, n = 14). 33% of pts received treatment for ≥6 months (HR+, n = 11 [69%]; HER2+, n = 3 [19%]; triple negative, n = 2 [12%]). ORR (all pts) was 18% and median PFS was 5.42 months. Efficacy data per subgroup are shown in the table. All 53 pts were included in the safety population; drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 51 pts (96%), most frequent were neutropenia (55%), alopecia (49%) and diarrhea (45%). 38 pts (72%) had grade ≥3 drug-related AEs, including neutropenia (49%), leukopenia (21%) and febrile neutropenia (4%). G-CSF use was 32%. 2 pts (4%) discontinued due to AEs (sepsis [grade 4], n = 1; neutropenia [grade 3], n = 1); no on-study deaths were reported. Treatment is ongoing in 3 HR+ pts. Whole-exome sequencing of selected tumor samples was completed. Correlative analysis is ongoing to identify potential genetic markers/mutated pathways associated with clinical response. Preliminary results will be presented.

Conclusions: MLN8237 appears to have a generally manageable toxicity profile and shows signs of single agent antitumor activity in pts with heavily pretreated (different molecular subgroups) of relapsed/refractory BrC supporting further evaluation of MLN8237 in this tumor type in different combination strategies.

Efficacy HR+ (n = 26)HER2+ (n = 9)Triple-negative (n = 14)Best response,%ORR (PR)23227Stable disease653336Progressive disease124457Median DOR, months4.2-*-**Median PFS, months7.94.11.5*2 events, **1 event

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr PD5-5.

Abstract P6-06-40: Analysis of outcome according to risk factors in the randomized phase III TURANDOT trial evaluating first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for HER2-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC)

Background: The randomized phase III TURANDOT trial compared first-line bevacizumab (BEV) + paclitaxel (PAC) vs BEV + capecitabine (CAP) in HER2-negative LR/mBC [Lang, Lancet Oncol 2013]. At the prespecified interim analysis there was no detectable difference in overall survival (OS; primary endpoint) between treatment groups, but the secondary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) favored BEV-PAC. We sought to identify patient populations defined by risk factors that may be most appropriately treated with one or other of the regimens.

Methods: Patients with HER2-negative LR/mBC who had received no prior chemotherapy for LR/mBC were randomized to either BEV-PAC (BEV 10 mg/kg d1 & 15 + PAC 90 mg/m2 d1, 8, & 15 q4w) or BEV-CAP (BEV 15 mg/kg d1 + CAP 1000 mg/m2 bid d1-14 q3w). The study population was categorized into three cohorts: triple-negative (TNBC), high-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and low-risk HR+. High-risk and low-risk HR+ were defined, respectively, as having ≥2 vs ≤1 of the following four risk factors: disease-free interval ≤24 months; visceral metastases; prior (neo)adjuvant anthracycline and/or taxane; ≥3 metastatic sites.

Results: Baseline characteristics, efficacy, and safety by treatment arm are summarized below for the three cohorts. Although PFS results in all cohorts favored BEV-PAC, interim OS results showed a trend in favor of BEV-PAC in TNBC patients and in favor of BEV-CAP in low-risk HR+ patients. Grade ≥3 adverse events were less common with BEV-CAP than BEV-PAC in all three cohorts.

 TNBCHigh-risk HR+Low-risk HR+ BEV-PAC (n = 63)BEV-CAP (n = 67)BEV-PAC (n = 146)BEV-CAP (n = 162)BEV-PAC (n = 75)BEV-CAP (n = 50)Median age, years545658576161ECOG PS 0,%756068666366PFS      Events, n (%)50 (79)54 (81)93 (64)125 (77)33 (44)35 (70)Median, months (95% CI)9.0 (7.8-10.7)5.6 (4.9-8.0)11.1 (10.4-13.4)8.3 (7.1-10.7)14.4 (10.4-20.5)11.5 (8.1-16.3)HR (95% CI)a1.37 (0.93-2.02)1.29 (0.98-1.69)1.39 (0.86-2.25)OS      Events, n (%)28 (44)34 (51)50 (34)52 (32)18 (24)11 (22)1-year OS rate,%786380828590HR (95% CI)a1.33 (0.80-2.19)0.97 (0.66-1.43)0.80 (0.38-1.69)Grade ≥3 AEs,%634261516148aBEV-CAP vs BEV-PAC

Conclusion: The simple risk factor index is prognostic for both PFS and OS and may be used to guide treatment choice when selecting BEV-containing therapy, balancing outcome with safety profile and patient preference. Final analysis of OS is expected in 2014.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-06-40.

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in prostate cancer - impact of PSA level before radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To retrospectively investigate the impact of prostate specific antigen (PSA) level after neoadjuvant androgen- deprivation therapy (ADT) on biochemical relapse-free survival in patients with prostate cancer who received radical radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

Between March 2003 and March 2008, 128 men with localized prostate cancer underwent neoadjuvant ADT for 4-6 months followed by radical RT. Biochemical relapse-free survival was compared between patients with pre-RT PSA ≤ 0.1 vs > 0.1 ng/mL.

RESULTS

At a median follow up of 47.3 months, biochemical relapse-free survival was significantly higher in patients with a pre-RT PSA ≤ 0.1 ng/mL compared with pre-RT PSA > 0.1 ng/mL (85.6 vs 63.2%, p = 0.0025).

CONCLUSION

The current analysis demonstrating better treatment outcome in patients with excellent biochemical response to neoadjuvant ADT, supports an individualized treatment strategy.

A multinational phase II trial of bevacizumab with low-dose interferon-α2a as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: BEVLiN

BACKGROUND

Avastin and Roferon in Renal Cell Carcinoma (AVOREN) demonstrated efficacy for bevacizumab plus interferon-α2a (IFN; 9 MIU tiw) in first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We evaluated bevacizumab with low-dose IFN in mRCC to determine whether clinical benefit could be maintained with reduced toxicity.

METHODS

BEVLiN was an open-label, single-arm, multinational, phase II trial. Nephrectomized patients with treatment-naive, clear cell mRCC and favourable/intermediate Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center scores received bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and IFN (3 MIU thrice weekly) until disease progression. Descriptive comparisons with AVOREN patients having favourable/intermediate MSKCC scores treated with bevacizumab plus IFN (9 MIU) were made. Primary end points were grade ≥3 IFN-associated adverse events (AEs) and progression-free survival (PFS). All grade ≥3 AEs and bevacizumab/IFN-related grade 1-2 AEs occurring from first administration until 28 days after last treatment were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients were treated; the median follow-up was 29.4 months. Any-grade and grade ≥3 IFN-associated AEs occurred in 53.4% and 10.3% of patients, respectively. The median PFS and overall survival were 15.3 [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.7-18.0] and 30.7 months (95% CI: 25.7-not reached), respectively. The ORR was 28.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with a historical control AVOREN subgroup, low-dose IFN with bevacizumab resulted in a reduction in incidence rates of IFN-related AEs, without compromising efficacy [NCT00796757].