Uncovering a novel pathway for p16 silencing: Therapeutic implications for lung cancer

A key step during onset of most cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the loss of the tumor suppressor p16^INK4a (best known as p16), commonly due to promoter hypermethylation. We recently reported a novel regulatory pathway involving E6-associated protein and cell division control protein 6, which provides a methylation-independent mechanism for p16 silencing in patients with a particularly aggressive form of NSCLC.

Abstract P5-16-01: Implementation of routine genomic and proteomic profiling of metastatic breast cancer patients in a community cancer center

Background: The optimal treatment strategy for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is currently unknown. Resistance to standard therapies, including anthracyclines and taxanes, limit the number of treatment options in many patients to a small number of non-cross resistant regimens. Rational combination approaches that are selected based upon genomic and proteomic analysis represents a possible advance that warrants extensive exploration.

Methods: Single center analysis of 77 consecutive metastatic breast cancer patients seen over a 12 month period (June 2014 through May 2015). All patients were referred for sequencing and the metastatic disease was rebiopsied. All samples were sent for standard pathologic, genomic (FoundationOne), and proteomic (TheraLink) analysis.

Results: Genomic and proteomic analysis yielded actionable targets in a majority of cases (89%). The most common pathways involved were the following: PI3K/Akt/mTOR (73%), MAPK (46%), ErbB (36%), FGFR (25%), and Jak/STAT (11%). Over 100 unique molecular aberrations were identified in 40 evaluable patients. Current outcomes are summarized in Table 1. The overall response rate was 45%, with another 43% of patients with stable disease. Average number of prior therapies was over 4, with a range of 1-11.

Table 1ER+/HER2-CR = 3PR = 8SD = 15PD = 2NE = 20ER+/HER2+CR = 2PR = 2SD = 1PD = 0NE = 9ER-/HER2+CR = 0PR = 1SD = 1PD = 1NE = 2Triple NegativeCR = 0PR = 2SD = 0PD = 2NE = 6Total evaluable patients = 40Overall CR = 13%Overall PR = 33%Overall SD = 43%Overall PD = 13%Total Not Evaluable = 37 pts (48%)Overall Response Rate (ORR) = 45%     CR = complete response PR = partial response SD = stable disease PD = progressive disease NE = not evaluable

Conclusion: Since current literature suggests that an overall response rate of approximately 10% or less is expected for patients that have received greater than 4 previous lines of therapy, the ORR seen in this analysis is quite remarkable. Most patients in this analysis were treated with FDA approved drugs off label, which provided additional challenges and was the primary reason that many patients were not evaluable. Patients were only evaluable if they received the recommended therapy and were measured for outcome. Our initial data provides growing evidence that it is critical to incorporate genomic and proteomic analysis (preferably as early as possible in the disease course) to allow for the best chance of disease response.

Citation Format: Williams CB, Krie A, De P, Dey N, Klein J, Williams KA, Hoogeveen M, Solomon B, Leyland-Jones B. Implementation of routine genomic and proteomic profiling of metastatic breast cancer patients in a community cancer center. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-01.

FGFR1 inhibition in lung squamous cell carcinoma: questions and controversies

Although the incidence of lung cancer has decreased due to the reduction of tobacco use, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death. Lung squamous cell carcinoma represents 30% of lung cancers and only recently have possible drug-targetable mutations been identified in this disease, including fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) gene amplification and genetic alterations in the phosphoinositide-3 kinase pathway. These discoveries have generated a great interest in the clinic and the initiation of clinical trials using FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors to treat FGFR-altered lung cancers. However, preliminary results from these studies have shown that not all patients respond to therapy. Here we review current unresolved questions on the selection of patients for their recruitment in FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor trials, how FGFR inhibitors could be combined with other targeted therapies or immunotherapies to improve patient outcome, and how the current preclinical models can help address these questions.

Frequency and prognostic significance of p16(INK4A) protein overexpression and transcriptionally active human papillomavirus infection in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Background:

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a powerful prognostic biomarker in a subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, specifically oropharyngeal cancers. However, the role of HPV in non-oropharyngeal sites, such as the larynx, remains unconfirmed.

Methods:

We evaluated a cohort of 324 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) patients for the expression of p16^INK4A (p16) protein by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and for high-risk HPV E6 and E7 mRNA transcripts by RNA in situ hybridisation (ISH). p16 expression and HPV status were correlated with clinicopathological features and outcomes.

Results:

Of 307 patients assessable for p16 IHC, 20 (6.5%) were p16 positive. Females and node-positive patients were more likely to be p16 positive (P<0.05). There were no other significant clinical or demographic differences between p16-positive and -negative cases. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between p16-positive and -negative patients with 2-year survival of 79% in each group (HR=0.83, 95% CI 0.36–1.89, P=0.65). There was no statistically significant difference in failure-free survival (FFS) with 2-year FFS of 79% and 66% for p16-positive and -negative patients, respectively (HR=0.60, 95% CI 0.26–1.36, P=0.22). Only seven cases were found to be HPV RNA ISH positive, all of which were p16 IHC positive. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between patients with HPV RNA ISH-positive tumours compared with -negative tumours with 2-year survival of 86% and 71%, respectively (HR=0.76, 95% CI 0.23–2.5, P=0.65). The 2-year FFS was 86% and 59%, respectively (HR=0.62, 95% CI 0.19–2.03, P=0.43).

Conclusions:

p16 overexpression is infrequent in LSCC and the proportion of cases with high-risk HPV transcripts is even lower. There are no statistically significant correlations between p16 IHC or HPV RNA ISH status and OS or disease outcomes.